https://doi.org/10.29154/ILBI.2019.21.042 박양신(朴羊信) 연세대학교 사학과를 졸업하고 일본 홋카이도대학에서 박사학위를 취득했다. 현 재 가천대학교 아시아문화연구소 책임연구원으로 재직 중이다. 일본근대사 전공으로, 사상사, 대 외 인식 등을 주된 연구영역으로 하고 있으며, 최근에는 식민정책학 관련 연구를 하고 있다. 저서 로 『 陸羯南: 政治認識と対外論』, 공저로 『제국일본의 문화권력』 2, 3이 있고, 논문으로 「식민정책 학의 신지평과 만주문제 인식」, 「‘대동아공영권’의 건설과 식민정책학」 등이 있다. ✽ 이 논문은 2019년 서울대학교 일본연구소 일본학연구지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행되었음. 1920년대 식민정책학의 대표적 텍스트 박양신 1920년대 일본 식민정책학의 식민정책론 식민지 본위주의와 자치주의 ✽ 2/
36
Embed
2 1920년대 일본 식민정책학의 식민정책론s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/160738/1/2. 박양신.pdf · 2019-08-28 · 43 1920년대 일본 식민정책학의 식민정책론
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Japan, Japanese, and the March First MoveMent the debate on
Military Use of colonial Koreans in the Japanese army Before and
after the March First Movement | PARK Wan The First World War
(1914~18) and the March First Movement (1919) shook the ruling
order of Japanese imperialism. With these events as the momentum,
Imperial Japan, as well as Japanese Army, sought the reorganization
of imperial ruling order.
The Japanese Korean Army (Chosen-gun) was optimistic about the
possibility of assimilating colonial Koreans and using them in the
military. Therefore, to promote the assimilation of Koreans, the
Army insisted that Military Academy should be open to Koreans and
Korean volunteer units should be organized. Also, the reinforcement
of deployed forces in Korea was requested, partly to accept Koreans
into the Army. These stances remained firm in spite of the shock
from the March First Movement.
On the other hand, the Ministry of War (Rikugunsho) focused on
political, economic, and military legitimacy. For them, the
military use of colonial Koreans was the final goal to be realized
after assimilating Koreans enough for the conscription law to be
enforced in Korea. Also, the March First Movement weakened their
optimism about the possibility of such assimilation. As a result,
the Ministry of War remained negative to the military use of
Koreans until the mid-1930s. • Keywords: the First World War, the
March First Movement, the Japanese Army, the Japanese
Korean Army (Chosen-gun), Utsunomiya Taro, Tanaka Giichi
colonial policy theories in colonial policy studies of Japan in the
1920s: colony-oriented policy and autonomy | PARK Yangshin In the
wake of the changes in world trends after World War I and the March
First Movement in colonial Korea, which was inspired by
nationalism, Japan’s colonial policy studies showed a different
change from the past. First, with regard to the purpose of colonial
occupation, the emphasis on the political and economic interests of
the colonial state was changed to stress the importance of the rule
considering the interests of the colony. Second, the discussion
over the colonial rule, which was not consistent before, came to a
consensus in criticizing assimilationism and advocating autonomy of
the colony in the 1920s.
This fundamental position of colonial policy theory is reflected in
the discussion on Japan’s
Abstract
316 21
colonialism of Chosun and Taiwan. They emphasized the need of
policies in consideration of the interests of Chosun and Taiwan,
while insisting on stopping assimilationism and employing autonomy
as a governance policy. Their interest was naturally directed
toward the expansion of the two colonies’ self-governance, but they
showed deviations in the extent of self-governance that should be
allowed in its implementation. Also with regard to representative
institutions, they all acknowledged that the establishment of
colonial parliament is more valid than having colonial
representatives participate in the Imperial Diet, but they differed
in the timing and regional feasibility of the establishment of the
Chosun Parliament and the Taiwan Parliament. • Keywords: colonial
policy studies, assimilationism, autonomy, Yamamoto Miono, Izumi
Akira,
Yanaihara Tadao
the March First Movement and Japanese settlers in colonial
Korea
| YEE Donghoon This article examines how Japanese settlers reacted
to and perceived the March First Movement. To consider Japanese
settlers’ perception towards the March First Movement, the paper
analyzes the initial reaction and the fixed perception after time
lapse. This study also focuses on Japanese settlers’ consciousness
which had been cultivated and shared in the Japanese
community.
Just after the March First Movement, most Japanese settlers looked
down on and ridiculed the independence movement. They believed that
Korean rioters misunderstood the national self-determination
principle due to their ignorance about international affairs.
Regarding the causes of the incident, they did not consider the
cruel military government rule in the 1910s and Japanese settlers’
discriminatory behavior.
For the perception towards the March First Movement, a difference
between Japanese in homeland and settlers in colonial Korea is
recognized. Contrary to Japanese in homeland, Japanese settlers’
consciousness had been formed by encountering and contacting with
the colonized. Therefore, Japanese settlers’ perception on Koreans
was exclusive and closed towards Korean society. On the basis of
this chauvinism, Japanese settlers insisted on imposing strong
measures against Koreans after the March First Movement. •
Keywords: the March First Movement, Japanese settler, colonizer,
settler colonialism
the March First Movement in the Kokumin shinbun | PARK Eun-Young
The March First Movement was an event that aroused the attention of
the Japanese media community, which had been indifferent to Chosun
for a long time. Most of the newspapers at that time were dragged
into the situation by reporting the announcements of the government
and the military, or posting editorials of the same purpose.
Instead of conveying the reality of Chosun enough, the articles of
exciting titles decorated the pages. This article focuses on the
media characteristics that were not of interest in previous studies
and examines
2. 1
2. 2
2. 3
2. 4