Top Banner
Search for the 0 "" Glueball in Υ(1S, 2S) decays Sen Jia Beihang University & KEK (on behalf of the Belle&BelleII Collaboration) INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SUBNUCLEAR PHYSICS 56th Course:From gravitational waves to QED, QFD and QCD
17

Υ(1S,2S) decays

Jan 09, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Υ(1S,2S) decays

Search for the 0"" Glueball in Υ(1S, 2S) decays

Sen JiaBeihang University & KEK

(on behalf of the Belle&BelleII Collaboration)

INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SUBNUCLEAR PHYSICS56th Course: From gravitational waves to QED, QFD and QCD

Page 2: Υ(1S,2S) decays

OutlinelKEKB and Belle Detector

lBelle2 experiment

lMotivation

lCommon selection criteria

lThe measurements of bottomonium inclusive

decays

lSearch for G0−−

lConslusion

S. Jia, EMFCSC 2018 -2-

Page 3: Υ(1S,2S) decays

KEKB and Belle Detector

KEK, Tsukuba, Japan

8 × 3.5 GeV22 mrad crossing

1999-20101014/fb

The KEKB Collider

World record:

L=2.1×1034/cm2/sec

S. Jia, EMFCSC 2018 -3-

Page 4: Υ(1S,2S) decays

Belle II Experiment

l Nano-beam design (by P. Raimondi for SuperB)

l Double beam currentsl Squeezes beam @IP by 1/20l Target luminosity is 𝓛 =𝟖×𝟏𝟎𝟑𝟓 cm-2s-1 (×40 w.r.t. BELLE)

A hadronic event recorded at 00:38, 26.04.2018the first collision comfirmation

Expected Dataset at Belle2

S. Jia, EMFCSC 2018 -4-

7.0 𝒆" × 4.0 𝒆3 GeV

Page 5: Υ(1S,2S) decays

Motivation

lQCD allows the existences of glueballs.

l There are no definite conclusions from experimental results. One of the reasons is its mixing with quarkonium states.

l The 0-- glueballs are inaccessible by the quarkonium states and their quantum numbers enable their productions in the decays of vector quarkonium easier.

l Search for 0-- glueballs in proposed production channel:Υ(1S,2S) →χ78+ G0

--, Υ(1S,2S) → f1(1285)+ G0--,χ98 → J/ψ+ G0

--,and χ98 →ω+ G0

--. The predicted glueballs masses are 2.80, 3.81 and 4.33GeV/c2.[PRL113, 221601 (2014)]、[JHEP 1510 (2015) 137]

-5-S. Jia, EMFCSC 2018

Page 6: Υ(1S,2S) decays

Data Sample

-6-

2.12E+07 0

1.02E+08

9.32E+06

9.86E+07

1.58E+08

0.00E+00

5.00E+07

1.00E+08

1.50E+08

2.00E+08

1 2 3

Data sample events of Y(1S) and Y(2S) Y(1S) Y(2S)

BABARCLEO BELLE

Belle experiment has collected the largest data samples of Υ(1S,2S) in the world !Analysis Strategy:

In the channels mentioned above, we search for the G0-- signals in the recoil

mass spectra of the χ78, f1(1285), J/ψ, and ω with G0-- widths varying from 0.0

to 0.5 GeV in steps of 0.05 GeV.

S. Jia, EMFCSC 2018

Page 7: Υ(1S,2S) decays

Common selections

S. Jia, EMFCSC 2018 -7-

l |dr| < 0.5cm, |dz| < 4cm and PT<0.1lGood photon candidates, Eγ>50MeV and not match the

extrapolation of any charged tracklNtrack > 4lReconstruct J/ψ, both Re >0.95; one Rµ>0.95 and the other

Rµ>0.05 l For pions, RK<0.4l For J/ψ, η and πA candidates, a mass constraint fit is used.

𝑅C =DE

DE3DFGFHE𝑅I =

DJDJ3DK3DL

𝑅M =DK

DK3DL

Window cuts:J/ψ: |𝑀OPOH-𝑚J/R|<0.03GeV/c2

χ78: 0.36 < 𝐸T∗ < 0.41f1(1285): 1.23<𝑀(𝜂𝜋3𝜋")<1.33GeV/c2

𝜔: 0.755<M(𝜋3𝜋"𝜋A)<0.805GeV/c2

Page 8: Υ(1S,2S) decays

χ78(1P) in Υ(1S, 2S) inclusive decays

l Partition the data samples according to the scaled momentum to correct the efficiency

𝑥 =𝑝[\]∗

12 𝑠� ×(𝑠 − 𝑚[\]

a )

Mode 𝑩𝑹(×10"d) Comments

Υ(1S) ⟶𝜒𝑐1 + 𝑎𝑛𝑦𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 1.90± 0.43± 0.14 with an improved precision

Υ(2S) ⟶𝜒𝑐1 + 𝑎𝑛𝑦𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 2.24± 0.44± 0.20 for the first time

The differential BR

S. Jia, EMFCSC 2018 -8-

Page 9: Υ(1S,2S) decays

lClear f1(1285) signal in ϒ(1S,2S) inclusive decays

l J/ψ production in χ9q (J = 0, 1, 2) decays

Υ 1S, 2S →f1(1285)+X and χ9q → J/ψ+X

Mode 𝑩𝑹(×10"d)

Υ(1S) ⟶ f1(1285)+ anything 46± 28± 13

Υ(2S) ⟶ f1(1285)+ anything 22± 15± 6.3

Mode 𝑩𝑹(×10"y)

𝜒za ⟶ J/ψ + anything 1.5± 0.34± 0.22

𝜒z8 ⟶ J/ψ + anything 1.1 at 90% C.L.

𝜒zA ⟶ J/ψ + anything 2.3 at 90% C.L.

3.5σ

S. Jia, EMFCSC 2018 -9-

Page 10: Υ(1S,2S) decays

The χ78 recoil mass spectra in the (a) Υ(1S) and (b) Υ(2S) data samples.

Measurements of Υ(1S,2S) →χ78/f1(1285) + G0--

The f1(1285) recoil mass spectra in the (a) Υ(1S) and (b) Υ(2S) data samples.

Mode Upper Limits at 90% C.L. Mode Upper Limits at 90% C.L.

Υ(1S,2S) ⟶ χ78 + G 10−5 Υ(1S,2S) ⟶ f1(1285) +G 10-4 -10-

Page 11: Υ(1S,2S) decays

-11-

Measurements of χ98 → J/ψ(ω) + G0−−

Mode Upper Limits at 90% C.L. Mode Upper Limits at 90% C.L.

χ98→J/ψ+G 10−4 χ98→ω+G 10-3

The χ98 is identified through the decay Υ(2S) → γ𝜒z8 .

The γJ/ψ recoil mass spectra in the Υ(2S) data samples.

The γω recoil mass spectra in the Υ(2S) data samples.

S. Jia, EMFCSC 2018

Page 12: Υ(1S,2S) decays

Ø We have searched for the 0−− glueball in ϒ(1S), ϒ(2S), and χ78decays for the first time.

Ø No evident signal is found at three theoretically predicted masses in the processes and 90% C.L. upper limits are set on the branching fractions.

Ø Distinct χ78 and f1(1285) signals are observed in the ϒ(1S) and ϒ(2S) inclusive decays.

Ø The evidence of χ9a → J/ψ+anything

Ø More opportunity in Belle II Experiment.

-12-

Conclusion

More opportunities

PRD 95, 012001 (2017)PRD 96, 112002 (2017)

Page 13: Υ(1S,2S) decays

Backup

Page 14: Υ(1S,2S) decays
Page 15: Υ(1S,2S) decays
Page 16: Υ(1S,2S) decays
Page 17: Υ(1S,2S) decays