1.OSU LIBRARIES 2.OSU COLLEGE OF EARTH, OCEANIC, AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Andrea A. Wirth 1 Bonnie Avery 1 Kuuipo Walsh 2 Marc Rempel 1 Oregon State University.

1. OSU LIBRARIES2. OSU COLLEGE OF EARTH, OCEANIC,

AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES

Andrea A. Wirth1

Bonnie Avery1

Kuuipo Walsh2

Marc Rempel1

Oregon State University

Geoscience Information Society November 6 th, 2012

THE OREGON SPATIAL DATA LIBRARYIN CONTEXT

SCOPE OF STUDY

• State spatial data clearinghouses

• Use by non-experts

• History of NSDI and clearinghouses

• Other assessments of clearinghouses?

• Reviewed 50 state clearinghouses for features appropriate to new/novice users

CLEARINGHOUSES

“A spatial data clearinghouse can be defined as an electronic facility for searching, viewing, transferring, ordering, advertising and/or disseminating spatial data from numerous sources via the Internet and, as appropriate, providing complementary services.”

Crompvoets, J., Bregt, A., Rajabifard, A., and I. Williamson. 2004. Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses. International Journal of Geographical Information 18(7): 665-689.

OREGON SPATIAL DATA LIBRARY (OSDL)

6

• Provides access to spatial data created by State of Oregon agencies• Launched November 2009• For: State of Oregon agency staff; general public,

consultants, educators, and students.• Framework data focus• Multi-phase project, grant funding• http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info

7

Oregon State UniversityUniversity Libraries

http://osulibrary.oregonstate.edu/

Oregon University SystemInstitute for

Natural Resources (INR)http://oregonstate.edu/inr/

OSDL PARTNERS

State of Oregon Geospatial

Enterprise Office (GEO)http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/CIO/GEO/

LIBRARIES + CLEARINGHOUSES

• Long history of working with state “data”

• New roles in data management

• Helping users find and evaluate information sources

• Pointing users to authoritative sources

Example subject guides: University of Maryland http://lib.guides.umd.edu/ & Syracuse University Library http://researchguides.library.syr.edu/

METHODS

• 50 states’ clearinghouses

• Selected characteristics• Literature review

• Basis in information literacy concepts

• Not a technical review

Information Literacy

1. keyword search

2. training or help documents specific to the site

3. ease of access to metadata

4. presence of locally unique data

5. Encourages data (or metadata) contributions

Literature Review

5 C

HAR

ACTE

RIS

TIC

S

KEYWORD SEARCHhttp://www.insideidaho.org

HELP DOCUMENTS/TRAININGhttp://wygl.wygisc.org/wygeolib/

METADATAhttp://lagic.lsu.edu/

LOCAL DATA http://www.kansasgis.org

CONTRIBUTIONS http://metadata.gis.washington.edu/

PRESENCE OF CHARACTERISTICS

Characteristic # clearinghouses (OSDL?)

Keyword search 23 (Y)

Customized help 17 (N)

Viewable metadata 38 (Y)

Local data focus 13 (Y)

Contributions solicited 14 (N)

For all clearinghouses

• Remember secondary audience for data

• Referrals from other sites

• Keep look and content “fresh”

• Encourage contributions whenever possible

OSDL

• Promote contributions to increase data

• More dynamic interface/Less “out of the box” look

• Customize help document

LOOKING FORWARD

[email protected]

THANK YOU&

QUESTIONS?

For more information: Wirth, A.A., Avery , B., Walsh, K., & Rempel, M. (2012). Statewide spatial data clearinghouses: an Oregon

Case Study. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 70. http://www.istl.org/12-summer/refereed4.html