Top Banner
1 May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone-depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM )
15

1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

Dec 13, 2015

Download

Documents

Rodney Chase
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

1 May 14, 2014

Uncertainties in projections of ozone-depleting substances and alternatives

Guus Velders

The Netherlands

(RIVM)

Page 2: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

2 Guus Velders

Focus on Ozone-Depleting Substances

● Projections of gases controlled by the Montreal Protocol– CFCs, halons, HCFCs, carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, CH3Br

● Projections for WMO assessments: – Made by 2D and 3D models– Policy options/scenarios often with box model

● Equivalent Effective Stratospheric Chlorine (EESC)

– Index for stratospheric chlorine and bromine and their ability to destroy ozone

– Uncertainties mostly not taken into account

● Uncertainties are important for these projections

Page 3: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

3 Guus Velders

Comprehensive uncertainty analyses

● EESC calculation using baseline production of ODSs from WMO(2011)● Same box model as in WMO(2011) used

● Uncertainties applied to 1σ . – Lifetimes of all ODSs from SPARC (2013): 12-33%– Production (past from UNEP) and future: 5%– Banks from TEAP: 10%, 20%– Emission factors: 10%, 20%– Fractional release values: 10%, 20%– Alpha (efficiency of Br compared to Cl): 25%– Age-of-air (vertical transport): 0.3 yr– Observed mixing ratios (as constraint): 0.1 ppt– Surface factor: 3%

Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis

Page 4: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

4 Guus Velders

Range in future mixing ratios

● Lifetimes and uncertainties from SPARC (2013)– Most likely and possible uncertainty ranges (1σ)– CFC-11: 52 yr 11% or 22%– CFC-12: 102 yr 8% or 15%– HCFC-22: 12 yr 16%– Halon-1211: 16 yr 33%– Halon-1301: 72 yr 9% or 13%

● Data before 2010 constrained by observations

● Mixing ratio range (95% conf.) 2050– ±35 ppt for CFC-11– ±48 ppt for CFC-12

Page 5: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

5 Guus Velders

Range in future EESC levels

● Uncertainties applied to lifetimes (of all ODSs) only

● EESC (mixing ratios) before 2010 constraint by observations

● Range in EESC levels– Mean: 1200 ppt in 2050– Range 1050-1350 ppt

● EESC return to 1980 levels– Mid-latitudes: 2048

● Range 2040 to 2061

– Antarctic: 2075● Range 2062 to 2101

Page 6: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

6 Guus Velders

ODSs contributing most to EESC uncertainty

● EESC return to pre-1980 levels● Largest contributions from CFC-11

and Halon-1211

● Correlations between uncertainties taken into account:

CFCs, CCl4, Halon-1301:

– Species mainly removed by photolysis in stratosphere

HCFCs, methyl chloroform, Halon-1211, CH3Cl, CH3Br:

– Species mainly removed by OH in troposphere

● Correlations increase total uncertainty

Page 7: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

7 Guus Velders

Range in future EESC levels: all uncertainties

● Uncertainties applied to all parameters and all ODSs

● EESC return to 1980 levels– Mid-latitudes: 2048

● Range 2039 to 2064

– Antarctic: 2075● Range 2061 to 2105

● Ranges only slightly larger than with uncertainties in lifetimes only

● Lower range: equal to zero emissions scenario

● Upper range: 12 times total projected HCFC emissions (2014-2050)

Page 8: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

8 Guus Velders

Parameters contributing most to EESC uncertainty

● Uncertainties applied to all parameters● Ranges in year of return to pre-1980

levels

● Largest contributions– Uncertainties in lifetimes

● Other contributions from– Age-of-air– Fractional release values– Bromine efficiency (alpha)

● Atmospheric burden much larger than current banks

– Factor of 4 for CFC-11– Factor of 30 for CFC-12

Page 9: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

9 Guus Velders

Uncertainties in ODP-weighted emissions

● ODPs also have uncertainties– CFCs: 30-35%– HCFCs: 55-70%– Halons: 60-90%

● Large contributions again from uncertainties in lifetimes

● Peak emission– Mean: 1.3 MtCFC-11-eq/yr– Range 0.9 to 1.8 MtCFC-11-eq/yr

● Total uncertainties (95% conf.) of 20% to more than 40%

Page 10: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

10 Guus Velders

Other factors also affect future ozone layer

● Non-Montreal Protocol related changes also important

● Increases in other gases: CO2, CH4, N2O:– Changes through chemical reactions: HOx, HCl, NOx, ClONO2

– Changes through temperature and dynamics of the atmosphere● Changes in emissions of very short lives species (VSLS)● Also potential effects from:

– Rockets– Aircraft– Volcanoes– Geoengineering– Biofuels– etc.

Picture NOAA/ESRL

Mt Pinatubo

Page 11: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

11 Guus Velders

Uncertainties in GWP-weighted emissions and RF

● Uncertainties can also be translated to climate metrics: GWP and RF

● Additional uncertainties from radiative efficiency and CO2 forcing

● Uncertainties: 20-40% 10-30%

Page 12: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

12 Guus Velders

Uncertainties in scenarios of ODS alternatives

● Alternatives used for ozone-depleting substances

– Hydrocarbons, CO2, NH3

– Alternative technologies: Mineral wool, etc.– HFCs with long lifetimes:

HFC-134a, HFC-125, HFC-143a, etc.

– HFCs with short lifetimes: HFC-1234yf, HFC-1234ze, etc.

● Uncertainties in HFCs lifetimes ~20%● Scenario uncertainty more important

● If current HFC mix (lifetime 15 yr) were replaced by HFCs with lifetimes less 1 month forcing in 2050 less than current HFC forcing

Velders et al. Science (2012)

Page 13: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

13 Guus Velders

Changes in types of applications: CFCs vs HFCs

● CFCs (1980s) used in very emissive applications– Spray cans, chemical cleaning– Release within a year

● HFCs used mostly in slow release applications– Refrigeration, AC: release from 1 – 10 yr– Foams: release > 10 yr

Velders et al. (20124)

Page 14: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

14 Guus Velders

Role of the banks increases for HFCs

● Banks: HFCs present in equipment: refrigerators, AC, foams, etc.

● Bank about 7 times annual emission

● Phaseout in 2020 instead of 2050– Avoided emission: 91-146 GtCO2-eq

– Avoided bank: 39- 64 GtCO2-eq

Banks: climate change commitment

● Choices:– Bank collection, destruction: difficult/costly– Avoid the buildup of the bank: early

phaseout

Page 15: 1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)

15 Guus Velders

● Uncertainties in lifetimes most important for EESC projections– Scenario uncertainty more important for ODS alternatives

● Growing importance of HFC banks for climate change

Work performed in close collaboration withJohn Daniel (NOAA, USA)

Thank you for your attention

References: - Velders and Daniel, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2014- Velders, Solomon and Danel, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2014

Conclusions