1997-2007 Frames, success and missed opportunities
Dec 31, 2015
1997 The impact of typhoon Linda resulted in 4,502 people dead or missing. This was the highest number of losses caused by a
typhoon in decades. 133,000 houses were seriously damagedThe Red Cross distributed building material to address the needs
Lesson learned
The distribution of building materials alone does not contribute to sustainable recovery.
Obvious but what alternatives do you have.
1998 : 11 provinces affected, 11.000 houses destroyed1999 : 7 provinces affected, 42.000 houses destroyed
Central Vietnam
The ObjectiveDevelop and supply houses that can resist the climate conditions of Central Vietnam
Over the past decade, Vietnam has emerged from years of poverty. Among the many changes, a tangible change has been the increase in private expenditure in housing and small-scale rural infrastructure. Families have rebuilt a vast percentage of rural housing in recent years to replace previous thatch and bamboo houses. Regrettably, this investment in new homes has not been matched by a parallel increase in their resistance to the effects of floods and storms. This weakness is largely because storm-resistant building details have been neglected.
Quote from Asian Disaster Preparedness Centre
A structure on poles
Solution : A flood resistant structure on poles and a typhoon resistant roof
• The frame kit is made of galvanised steel, a material that has a strong resistance against corrosion.
•The parts of the platform, house structure and roofing are assembled with bolds and nuts to facilitate quick and easy building.
• The roofing sheets are fixed to the structure with a special attachement technic The roof can resist wind presure up to 125kg/m2.
• For an optimal stability of the structure: The house frame and roof are braced, the platform is reenforced.
2006 Banda Aceh, Tsunami Program
- Erected the 6 November - Presented the 14 November- 20 000 units order- 5 000 units in delivery process- 15 implementing partners
First prototype
What can we Learn
• Emergency Transitional Permanent ???
• Can we adapt to the way people build and maintain standards at the same time ???
• Could this approach provide people collateral for loans/Insurances ???
• (And could it be part of an overall mitigation strategy)