19.0 Conclusion
Dec 17, 2015
19.0 Conclusion
19.1.1
Debate over intervention vs. non-intervention goes back two hundred years
Jean-Baptiste Say (1803) – market system can and does coordinate effectively (Say’s law)
Market economy will produce outcomes that are analogous to a simple Robinson Crusoe Society
David Ricardo vs. Robert Malthus
Argue over non-intervention
Ricardo believes in it
Malthus says Ricardo is wrong because he believes in Say’s Law – and the nice assumptions are not realistic
Ricardo influences many others for over a century
There is a focus in the 1800’s on micro issues
John Maynard Keynes (1936)
General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
“Error not with the superstructure, but with
a lack of clearness and a generality in the premises”
Keynes was questioning the nice assumptions
Why?
1930’s Great Depression
More Keynes
Analogy is false when moving from Crusoe to the real world
Markets are subject to distortion and failure,
as opposed to the perfect coordination in R.C.’s head
Gist - intervention may be necessary to correct breakdowns in the system
19.2.1
Why can’t economists resolve this debate?
Problem lies in the testing of data
Testing methods are imperfect, so error may escaped an unbiased observer
Often, there are no unbiased observers
Competing viewpoints, each with strong “evidence”, coexist
19.2.2 Operationalizing a model
Theoretical definition – concept that is used in the model
Technical definition – criteria we can use to measure the concept
Transforming theoretical definitions into technical definitions can be imperfect
This must be done in order for the model to be tested
19.2.3
Those working with technical definitions face problems of data collection
Ex. Expenses, availability, accessibility of data
Macro variables are so large, technical definitions are proxies (substitutes) for theoretical definitions they represent
Unemployment rate
Equals
(Number unemployed / Labor Force) X 100%
Labor force technical definition –
age 16 to 65
Not in an institution (jail)
Working, Laid off,
Or actively looking for work
If not looking – voluntarily unemployed – not in labor force
Problems with this technical definition
Ignores volunteers, housework
Those discouraged workers who stop looking are not counted in the unemployment rate
Plus, those working 1 hour a week for pay are considered employed
Ignores problem of underemployment
In a macro sense,
The question of whether or not the economy will reach full employment
Depends on what the natural rate is
Tough to measure
There are also problems with measuring GDP
4 criterion
1)Must be exchanged for money-
Ignores volunteer work, barter to avoid IRS
2)Must be legal-
Ignores large parts of the underground economy
3)Must be current production-
Used cars don’t count
4)Must be final goods-
Avoids problem of double counting
This way of measuring GDP
Ignores things not sold in the marketplace
Schools, national defense-
Not counted
Technical measure of GDP is only a proxy for the real GDP we talk about in theory
At least macro variables are measured
In micro, there are often no measures of the values of the variables in the models
Example
In trying to figure out what determines the number of hours per week a person will work,
experience might be a variable
With thousands of individuals involved
researchers might use
Age – Education – 6
as a proxy
This proxy
doesn’t account for the fact that not all years are equal
Goofing off, quality of schools, years outside the labor force all not factored in
There are all kinds of problems with
both macro and micro data
This contributes to coexistence of competing theories
Further, there are testing flaws that arise
19.2.4
Multiple variable regression analysis – Powerful statistical tool Used to show effects of many variablesScientists can easily manipulate variables to fit the
predictionsSocial sciences are not exactThese problems in testing lead to the continuing
debate in economics
19.3 Conclusion
Under the ideal conditions –
Nice assumptions and just distribution of initial endowments-
a market system can realize an efficient and just society
Smith realized that is difficult to achieve, because
vice exists
Rationality of individuals is the cause of
both virtue and vice in competition
Specialization and gains from trade can lead to self-benefit
Self-interest can also lead to rent-seeking, which distorts the distribution
This story does not provide answers
It provides tools for thinking critically about the world
It is not just about what to buy and where to work
What values to adopt, and for whom to vote will be equally important
In the U.S., you have a government that lets you choose the leaders and their policies
Challenge of a free society
that is made of lesser beings than angels
Individuals must balance between self-interest and a commitment to civic values
Society must determine the balance between individual freedom and society’s right to impose rules
What kind of society will we have?