US 20090327024A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0327024 A1 (19) United States Nielsen et al. (43) Pub. Date: Dec. 31, 2009 (54) METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF A FIELD SERVICE OPERATION (75) Inventors: Steven E. Nielsen, North Palm Beach, FL (US); Curtis Chambers, Palm Beach Gardens, FL (US); David Pennington, Juno Beach, FL (US); Jeffrey Farr, Jupiter, FL (Us) Correspondence Address: WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, RC. 600 ATLANTIC AVENUE BOSTON, MA 02210-2206 (US) (73) Assignee: CertusVieW Technologies, LLC, Palm Beach Gardens, FL (US) (21) App1.No.: 12/493,109 (22) Filed: Jun. 26, 2009 Related US. Application Data (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 12/204,454, ?led on Sep. 4, 2008. (60) Provisional application No. 61/076,253, ?led on Jun. 27, 2008, provisional application No. 61/102,151, ?led on Oct. 2, 2008, provisional application No. Method 200 61/102,169, ?led on Oct. 2, 2008, provisional applica tion No. 61/102,186, ?led on Oct. 2, 2008, provisional application No. 61/102,205, ?led on Oct. 2, 2008, pro visional application No. 61/151,574, ?led on Feb. 11, 2009, provisional application No. 61/151,578, ?led on Feb. 11, 2009, provisional application No. 61/1 84,092, ?led on Jun. 4, 2009, provisional application No. 61/220,491, ?led on Jun. 25, 2009. Publication Classi?cation (51) Int. Cl. G06Q 10/00 (2006.01) (52) us. c1. .......................................................... .. 705/9 (57) ABSTRACT Methods, apparatus and systems for computer-aided determi nation of quality assessment for locate and marking opera tions. In one example, a quality assessment decision is solely under the discretion of a human revieWer, albeit facilitated in some respects by computer-aided display of information, and electronic record keeping and communication functions asso ciated With the quality assessment result(s). In another example, information related to a locate and marking opera tion is electronically analyzed such that a quality assessment is not based solely on human discretion, but rather based at least in part on some predetermined criteria and/ or metrics that facilitate an automated determination of quality assess ment. Locate technician 21 O completes ticket and _/ provides dig area/“image Approver views inbox and selects certain —‘ locate technician and 1 ticket for quality control review 212 Apprcver reviews dig area/image data of selected ticket r218 Coaching referral routed to approveriribox - i Ticket approval process / l is completed Q9 REFERRA‘: 224 i 220 ‘f i A if . 1 . pprover pe owns Cit-D rgkegotjer?éffe?eic { coaching activity with 234 pp 1 locator l f 226 ‘I T r222 QC approver routes N01 L ticket back to originating Ac‘fpt (If: ---' Um?“ and appfm’ai rover re one sign off_ coaching app Y activities es QC approver routes 228 @D ticket to QC technician for execution 230 232 C10 technician completes / 0 . . ticket and provides . ngina mg apprmfer u dated locatenma e ——> views inbox and reviews i t p 9 updated ticket
59
Embed
(19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. … · 2014-03-25 · Patent Application Publication Method 1300 Dec. 31, 2009 Sheet 14 0f 19 @ US 2009/0327024 A1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
US 20090327024A1
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0327024 A1 (19) United States
Nielsen et al. (43) Pub. Date: Dec. 31, 2009
(54) METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF A FIELD SERVICE OPERATION
(75) Inventors: Steven E. Nielsen, North Palm Beach, FL (US); Curtis Chambers, Palm Beach Gardens, FL (US); David Pennington, Juno Beach, FL (US); Jeffrey Farr, Jupiter, FL (Us)
Correspondence Address: WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, RC. 600 ATLANTIC AVENUE BOSTON, MA 02210-2206 (US)
Methods, apparatus and systems for computer-aided determi nation of quality assessment for locate and marking opera tions. In one example, a quality assessment decision is solely under the discretion of a human revieWer, albeit facilitated in some respects by computer-aided display of information, and electronic record keeping and communication functions asso ciated With the quality assessment result(s). In another example, information related to a locate and marking opera tion is electronically analyzed such that a quality assessment is not based solely on human discretion, but rather based at least in part on some predetermined criteria and/ or metrics that facilitate an automated determination of quality assess ment.
Locate technician 21 O completes ticket and _/
provides dig area/“image
Approver views inbox and selects certain
—‘ locate technician and 1
ticket for quality control review
212
Apprcver reviews dig
area/image data of selected
ticket r218
Coaching referral routed to approveriribox - i
Ticket approval process / l is completed Q9 REFERRA‘: 224 i 220
‘f i A if . 1 . pprover pe owns
Cit-D rgkegotjer?éffe?eic { coaching activity with 234 pp 1 locator
l
f 226 ‘I T r222 QC approver routes N01
L ticket back to originating Ac‘fpt (If: ---' Um?“ and appfm’ai rover re one sign off_ coaching
app Y activities es
QC approver routes 228 @D ticket to QC technician
for execution 230 232
C10 technician completes / 0 . . ticket and provides . ngina mg apprmfer u dated locatenma e ——> views inbox and reviews i