(16 JUNE 2015) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II (2013- 2016) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations
Dec 22, 2015
(16 JUNE 2015)
WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES
EMODnet Chemistry II (2013-2016)WP5 Analysis and Recommendations
BACKGROUND: and the tools they have...
DG-MARE (Maritime Affairs)
Data Collection Framework (DCF) and DC-MAPMarine Knowledge 2020EMODNET
DG-ENV (Environment) & EEA
Water and Marine Framework Directive (WFD/MSFD) Habitats, Bathing water etc. DirectivesINSPIRE (Public body spatial data)WISE and WISE-Marine
EMODnet Chemistry II (2013-2016)WP5 Analysis and Recommendations
WP description: inputs• Specific MSFD feedback through WG-DIKE and TG
DATA • Additional workshops i.e. EMD-MSFD interaction• Feedback from Chemistry project partners including
data providers (see next presentation by Matteo)• Overall EMODNet strategy developments at EU and
Member States levels
EMODnet Chemistry II (2013-2016)WP5 Analysis and Recommendations
WP description: objectives• Engage with MSFD stakeholders and align/revise
chemical portal and products through dialogue• identify key users and report on the effectiveness of the
system in meeting the needs of end-users• provide a summary feedback to the products work
package (WP3) • To establish efficient tools to obtain users feedback
Data –> Information flow for MSFD(coordinated)
Monitoring
Data provision
Ingestion
Data assembly (products)
Indicator provision
Assessment product(s)
data information knowledge
[National] and [Regional
bodies]
Regional Conventions
and EEA[EM
ODnet] a
nd
[Reg
ional Sy
stems]
INSPIRE: Marine Pilot WS (8-9 June), Copenhagen
Lead: JRCParticipants: DGENV, EEA, national experts (NL, DE, DK) and RSC’s- Capacity building; Training on transformation
of data for INSPIRE compliance- Reporting for MSFD using INSPIRE
compliant/based services
INSPIRE: Marine Pilot WS (8-9 June), Copenhagen
- Would services harvested by EEA with a timestamp, be a legal reporting for MSFD?
- Report to be drafted for DIKE meeting in October by EEA/DG ENV and some MS
- Next meeting 5 September in the Netherlands
- EMODnet Steering will meet with JRC/INSPIRE in late June
- WISE-Marine ‘knowledge’ mapping
Assessment
Data Collection (sources of observations)
Data assembly
IndicatorsWG-DIKE
WG-GES
WISE Marine – slowly taking shape
a web-based portal for sharing information to the marine community on the marine environment
WISE-Mhttp://marine.europa.eu
WISE Marine
WISE-Marine landing page (ENV) http://marine.europa.eu/
State of the marine
environment (EEA)
Policy (ENV) Data (EEA) JRC competence
center (JRC)
State of the marine environment (EEA)
Drivers PressuresState of marine
ecosystem
Impacts on ecosystem
services and
natural capital
Response
Data (EEA)
Data products (information shown)
Indicators Assessment tools
Data services
(e.g. EMODNET)
Reference layers and
MSFD maps
MS reported data (inputs to WISE-M)
MSFD Art 8, 9 and 10
MSFD Art 13
MSFD Art 11
MSFD Art 19.3
(RSC data?)
WISE SOE (TCM)
WISE-Marine landing page (ENV) http://marine.europa.eu/
State of the marine
environment (EEA)
Policy (ENV) Data (EEA)JRC
competence center (JRC)
The MIS structure (still being revisited under level2 and 3)
Marine Information Schema (RSC support contract)
MIS 1: DPSIR
RESP
ON
SES
Ecosystem Services
State
Pressures
Human Activities
Drivers
Based on, but not identical to, the Marine Information Schema (RSC support project, 2015 – in development)
MIS 2: Integrated Ecosystem Assessment
Programme of measuresEvaluation of measures
Reporting
Art 13: Management
GES ObjectivesTemporal and Spatial Scope
Targets
Arts 9 & 10: Scoping and Targets
Art 7: Competent Authorities
Art 8 Initial Assessment
IndicatorsMethodology etc
Monitoring networkMonitoring methods/guidelines
Art 11: Monitoring Programme
MIS 3: Evidence base
Art 19.3 Data underpinning Art. 8 and 11
DatasetsStationAreaTimeseriesSample methodQC information
VocabsStationSpecies/HabitatsParametersUnits etc.QC flags
Data assemblyMethodologySpatial units
MIS 1: DPSIR
RESP
ON
SES
Ecosystem Services
State
Pressures
Human Activities
Drivers
Indicators are the connector between evidence and status
MIS 2: Integrated Ecosystem Assessment
Programme of measuresEvaluation of measures
Reporting
Art 13: Management
GES ObjectivesTemporal and Spatial Scope
Targets
Arts 9 & 10: Scoping and Targets
Art 7: Competent Authorities
Art 8 Initial Assessment
IndicatorsMethodology etc
Monitoring networkMonitoring methods/guidelines
Art 11: Monitoring Programme
MIS 3: Evidence base
Art 19.3 Data underpinning Art. 8 and 11
DatasetsStationAreaTimeseriesSample methodQC information
VocabsStationSpecies/HabitatsParametersUnits etc.QC flags
Data assemblyMethodologySpatial units
MSFD key interactions (2014/2015)
Sept ’14 EMODnet – MSFD interaction meetingDGMARE, DGENV, EEA, 2 member states, OSPAR and HELCOM, EMODnet Bio, Chem and Sec- Focus was more on biological than chemical- Chemistry presented by Alessandra and ‘data
product preparation’ exercise for EEA presented by Neil
MSFD key interactions (2014/2015)
Sept ’14 EMODnet – MSFD interaction meetingDISCUSSIONS- Chemical buffer- Regional focus: Mediterranean - Northern RSC’s heavily invested in current
systems/process. Little incentive to change in short term
MSFD key interactions (2014/2015)
Feb ’15 EMODnet – MSFD interaction meetingThe usual suspects- relevance of EMODnet chemistry (data) to
OSPAR/HELCOM? - Concentrating on the Mediterranean and Black Sea- Appropriate information in the metadata to identify
chemistry data suitable for inclusion in MSFD reporting based on QA and QC procedures
MSFD key interactions (2014/2015)
Feb ’15 EMODnet – MSFD interaction meetingThe usual suspects- HELCOM and OSPAR indicator specifications should
identify the appropriate metadata needed- EMODnet Chemistry to report back on progress to
next meeting, including possibilities to filter data on these metadata fields
- Progress in developing mechanisms for accessing data from non-EMODnet partner sources.
RSC Indicators as of June 2015
- 200 regional indicators- 28 equate to D5 Eutrophication- 47 equate to D8ish Contaminants- Operational status unknown for most- Most are under development, developed but
not adopted or no information
Indicators elementsHELCOM and OSPAR indicator specifications should identify the appropriate metadata needed
Indicators elements analysis
Categories EEA fields HELCOM fields OSPAR fieldsAccess and Use 1Assessment Findings 4 3 8Assessment methods 5 7 1Assessment Purpose 6 7 4Contact and Ownership 2 2 2Data inputs and outputs 8 3 2Geographical scope 1 1 8Labelling and Classification 7 1 10Quality Aspects 3 6 1Temporal scope 2 2Version control 6 1 3Grand Total 44 31 42
WGDIKE paper DIKE_11-2015-05