Top Banner
1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review of syllabus Semester wise /year wise INDEX Sr. No. Particular Page No. 1 Blank feedback forms of stakeholders 2-5 2 Sample Filled feedback forms of parents 6-10 3 Sample Filled feedback forms of Alumni 11-15 4 Sample Filled feedback forms of Teachers 16-20 5 Sample Filled feedback forms of Students 21-25
26

1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

Feb 05, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review of syllabus Semester

wise /year wise

INDEX

Sr. No. Particular Page No.

1 Blank feedback forms of stakeholders 2-5

2 Sample Filled feedback forms of parents 6-10

3 Sample Filled feedback forms of Alumni 11-15

4 Sample Filled feedback forms of Teachers 16-20

5 Sample Filled feedback forms of Students 21-25

Page 2: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

1

Priyadarshini College of Engineering

Session 2017-18

Parents Feedback on Curriculum

Rate the Particulars by putting tick mark in appropriate cell.

Sr.No. Particulars High Moderate Poor

1 Rate the learning experience gained by the ward

through curriculum of the course

2 Rate the competency of the curriculum with respect to

other Universities

3 Rate the relevance of curriculum to the program

4 Rate the incorporation of recent changes of technology

in the curriculum

5 Satisfaction level of curriculum design as per the

requirement of employability / Higher Learning.

Suggestions for further Improvement

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Name & Signature

Page 3: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

2

Priyadarshini College of Engineering

Session 2017-18

Alumni Feedback on Curriculum.

Rate the Particulars by putting tick mark in appropriate cell.

Sr.No. Particulars High Moderate Poor

1 Curriculum meets prerequisite and basic

knowledge required for the career.

2 Usefulness of learning experience in career.

3 Electives offered in relation to the

technological advancements.

4 The new courses (subjects) Introduced meet

contemporary (existing) requirements.

5 Design of the courses (subjects) encourages /

motivates extra learning or self learning.

Suggestions for further Improvement.

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Name and Address of Alumni:

Page 4: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

3

Priyadarshini College of Engineering

Session 2017-18

Teachers Feedback on Curriculum

Rate the Particulars by putting tick mark in appropriate cell.

Sr.No. Particulars High Moderate Poor

1 The learning objectives are clear and appropriate

to the program.

2 The curriculum and syllabus are well organized

and suitable to the program.

3 The text Books/Reference Books are well suited

to the course.

4 The system followed by the university for the

design and development of curriculum is

effective.

5 Provision to update curriculum time to time.

6 How do you rate the distribution of contact hours

among the course components?

7 The curriculum has a good balance between theory

and practical.

8 How do you rate the electives offered in relation

to the technological advancements.

Suggestions for further Improvement.

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Name and signature of teacher:

Page 5: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

4

Priyadarshini College of Engineering

Session 2017-18

Students Feedback on Curriculum

Rate the Particulars by putting tick mark in appropriate cell.

Sr.No. Particulars High Moderate Poor

1 The sequence of the courses (subjects) in the

curriculum

2 Size of syllabus in terms of the load on the

student.

3 The objectives stated for each of the course.

4 The offering of the electives in terms of their

relevance to the specialized streams.

5 How do you rate the electives offered in relation

to the technological advancements.

6 Content of the courses encourages extra learning

/ self learning.

7 How do you rate the percentage (Number) of

courses having practical components?

8 How do you rate the domain used for

Designing/performing the experiments in the

laboratory.

Suggestions for further Improvement

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

Name of Student (Optional):

Semester:

Page 6: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

5

Page 7: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

6

Page 8: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

7

Page 9: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

8

Page 10: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

9

Page 11: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

10

Page 12: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

11

Page 13: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

12

Page 14: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

13

Page 15: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

14

Page 16: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

15

Page 17: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

16

Page 18: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

17

Page 19: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

18

Page 20: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

19

Page 21: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

20

Page 22: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

21

Page 23: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

22

Page 24: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

23

Page 25: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

24

Page 26: 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...

25