Top Banner
Philippine storm surges reported by PAGASA
16
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Philippine storm surges reported by PAGASA

Page 2: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Reclamation area

Ocean front of this reclamation would experience storm surges as high as 4 meters (13+ feet) – increasing as climate change increases the strength of typhoons.

Large storm waves would ride on top of these surges.

Page 3: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/surge/

Storm surges are worse if they happen at high tide.

This increases the difficulty of predicting storm surge size, requiring weather forecasts accurate to within a few hours.

Page 4: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Storm surge

Pinakamapanganib ang storm surge kung mababa ang dahilig ng lupa sa ilalim ng dagat, kagaya sa Manila Bay.

Steep seafloor

Gently sloping seafloor

Page 5: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Typhoon Patsy 14-22 Nov ‘70

Typhoon Ora 22-30 Jun ‘72

Ocean-going freighters parked on Roxas

Boulevard by Patsy and Ora

Page 6: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

3. Liquefaction during earthquakes

In water-saturated material such as natural bay fill or

reclamation, the solid grains normally are

touching. The lower grains bear the weight of grains and buildings on top of

them.

But during the minute that an earthquake lasts, the

shaking breaks the contact between grains. Together,

the solids and water behave as a “slurry”, or liquid

without strength. Buildings sink or topple into it.

Page 7: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

“Sand boils”Liquified sand comes up to the surface during the

earthquake

Page 8: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Mexico City, 1985

Page 9: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Coastal areas underlain by natural sediment and artificial reclamation fill are particularly susceptible to liquefaction during earthquakes.

This is true for California’s Bay area as well as Manila Bay.

Page 10: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Earthquake hazard map, Bay Area, California

Page 11: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Northeastern San Francisco California

Most vulnerable areas are natural bay fill and reclaimed areas

Page 12: 13 0809 reclamation part ii
Page 13: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Liquefaction in the Marine District in San Francisco, Calif., caused damage during the October 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.

Page 14: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Reclamation areas in Manila Bay would not require an earthquake to occur nearby to suffer serious damage. Manila was the city hardest hit by the magnitude 7.3 earthquake in 1968. Its epicenter was in Casiguran, Quezon, 225 kilometers away. Many structures that were built on river deposits near the mouth of the Pasig River suffered severe damage from liquefaction. The six-story Ruby Tower in Binondo collapsed, killing 260 people.

Page 15: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Lessons from the 1990 earthquake Epicenter: Near Rizal,

northeast of Cabanatuan, Nueva Ecija

Major damage: Baguio City 100 kilometers away

Dagupan, Pangasinan, 100 kilometers away

Page 16: 13 0809 reclamation part ii

Dagupan, Pangasinan 1990