Top Banner

of 22

13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

Aug 08, 2018

Download

Documents

Florian Mueller
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    1/22

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

    APPEAL NO.- -SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD and SAMSUNGTELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC,

    Appellant,v.

    INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,Appellee.

    On Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission,Invest igation No. 337-TA-794

    SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNGTELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC'S PETITION FOR REVIEW

    Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1295(a)(6), 19 U.S.C. 1337, Fed. R. App. P. 15(a)and Fed. Cir. R. 15(a)(2), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SamsungTelecommunications America, LLC ("Appellant") hereby petitions the Court forreview of and appeal from International Trade Commission's "Notice of theCommission's Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance ofa Limited Exclusion Order and a Cease and Desist Order; Termination of the

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 1 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    2/22

    Investigation" entered on June 4, 2013 (attached as Exhibit 1) and its underlyingdeterminations, including, but not limited to, the Commission Opinion issued onJune 4, 2013 (attached as Exhibit 2) and the Initial Determination issued onSeptember 14, 2012 (attached as Exhibit 3). This case was styled before theUnited States International Trade Commission as In the Matter of CertainElectronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Musicand Data Processing Devices, and Tablet Computers, Inv. No. 337-TA-794.

    A check for the docketing fee of $450.00 payable to "Clerk of Court, UnitedStates Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit" as required by Fed. Cir. R. 52 isalso enclosed.Dated: July 18, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

    _J 'ffJvl. - \4 ? ) , / . / ~ ' - - . " - . ~ ~ / . _ . - / ' . - ' - JCharles K. VerhoevenQUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP50 California Street, 22nd FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111Telephone: (415) 875-6600Facsimile: (415) 875-6700Kathleen M. Sullivan51 Madison Ave., 22nd FloorNew York, New York 10010Telephone: (212) 849-7 000Facsimile: (212) 849-7100

    2

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 2 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    3/22

    Paul F. BrinkmanAlan L. WhitehurstS. Alex LasherDerek ShafferMarissa R. DuccaQUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP1299 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Ste. 825Washington D.C. 20004Telephone: (202) 538-8000Facsimile: (202) 538-8100Kevin P .B. JohnsonVictoria F. MaroulisQUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th FloorRedwood Shores, CA 94065Telephone: (650) 801-5000Facsimile: (650) 801-5100John B. QuinnWilliam PriceRobert J. BecherQUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP865 S. Figueroa St., 1oth FloorLos Angeles, CA 90017Telephone: (213) 443-3000Facsimile: (213) 443-3100Counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.and Samsung Telecommunications America,LLC

    3

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 3 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    4/22

    QUinn emanuel trlallawvers Iwashlngtan. deIZ99 Pennsylvania Avenue NW , Suite 8z5, Washington, District of Columbia zooo4-Z400 J TE L (zoz) 538-8ooo FAX (zoz) 538-8wo

    July 18, 2013

    VIA VIA HAND DELIVERYDaniel E. O'TooleCircuit Executive & Clerk of CourtUnited States Court of Appealsfor the Federal Circuit717 Madison Place, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20439

    Re: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC v. ITC,No. 13-

    Dear Mr. O'Toole:Enclosed for filing are the original and three copies of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. andSamsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Petition for Review of the United StatesInternational Trade Commission's Final Determination in Investigation No. 337-TA-794 findingno violation of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,771,980; 7,450,114; and 7,486,644. The exhibits have beenprovided on CD due to their size, and both confidential and non-confidential versions of theexhibits have been provided. Also enclosed is a check for $450 made out to "Clerk, U.S. Courtof Appeals, Federal Circuit" for the filing fee associate with Samsung's Petition for Review.Finally, also enclosed for filing are Entries of Appearance for Kathleen M. Sullivan, Paul F.Brinkman, Alan L. Whitehurst, Derek L. Shaffer, and Marissa R. Ducca. Please feel free tocontact me if you have any questions.Very truly yours,t ! V ~ / 0 ) ~Marissa R. DuccaMRD

    quinn emanuel uruuhan& sulllnn, liPLOS ANGELES INE W YORK I SAN FRANCISCO I SILICON VALLEY ICHICAGO I LONDON ITOKYO IMANNHEIM IMOSCOW I HAMBURG] PARIS

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 4 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    5/22

    RECEIPT FOR PAYMENTUnited States Court ofAppealsReceivedFrom

    For The Federal CircuitOFFICE OF THE CLERKQ LL( r-n , f:..h-cJ. (/\ ue I

    i (NAME)

    (CASE NO.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ = ( A D = D R ~ E ~ S S _ ) ___________ l (, 9 }, 3(SHORT TITLE) (D,j:E)ACCOUNT

    Clerk's Fee for docketing case C:LTCertificate of membershipCertified copy of

    Copy of opinionCopy of documentsReimbursement fees

    Deputy C l e r ~ ~ { TOTALCredit Card 0 Cash 0

    n r : : o s f ) ~'"',.. ' :.,... :.,.. ;'. ,.

    AMOUNTILfc:o oo

    4s--o ooMONEYoORDER

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 5 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    6/22

    EXHIBIT 1

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 6 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    7/22

    UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSIONWashington; D.C.

    In the Matter ofCERTAIN ELECTRONIC DEVICES,INCLUDING WIRELESSCOMMUNICATION DEVICES,PORTABLE MUSIC AND DATAPROCESSING DEVICES, AND TABLETCOMPUTERS

    Inv. No. 337-TA-794

    NOTICE OF THE COMMISSION'S FINAL DETERMINATION FINDING AVIOLATION OF SECTION 337; ISSUANCE OF A LIMITED EXCLUSION ORDERAND A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER; TERMINATION OF THE INVESTIGATION

    AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.ACTION: Notice.SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found aviolation of section 337 in this investigation and has issued a limited exclusion order prohibitingrespondent Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California ("Apple"), from importing wirelesscommunication devices, portable music and data processing devices, and tablet computers thatinfringe claims 75-76 and 82-84 ofU.S. Patent No. 7,706,348 ("the '348 patent"). TheCommission has also issued a cease and desist order against Apple prohibiting the sale anddistribution within the United States of articles that infringe claims 75-76 and 82-84 of the '348patent. The Commission has found no violation based on U.S. Patent Nos. 7,486,644 ("the '644patent"), 7,450,114 ("the ' 114 patent"), and 6,771 ,980 ("the '980 patent"). The Commission' sdetermination is fmal, and the investigation is terminated.FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: ClarkS. Cheney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S.International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone(202) 205-2661. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with thisinvestigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45a.m. to5:15p.m.) in the Office ofthe Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning theCommission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). Thepublic record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket(EDIS) at http:/ /edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on thismatter can be obtained by contacting the Commission' s TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation onAugust 1, 2011 , based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea andSamsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively, "Samsung").

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 7 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    8/22

    76 Fed Reg. 45860 (Aug. 1, 2011). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the TariffAct of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the United States, the salefor importation, and the sale within the United States after importation ofcertain electronicdevices, including wireless communication devices, portable music and data processing devices,and tablet computers, by reason of infringement of various U.S. patents. The notice ofinvestigation names Apple as the only respondent. The patents remaining in the investigation arethe '348, '644, '114, and ' 980 patents. The complaint also alleged infringement ofU.S. PatentNo. 6,879,843, but the investigation with respect to that patent was previously terminated basedon withdrawn allegations.On September 14, 2012, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued his finalinitial determination ("ID") finding no violation of section 337 based on the four patentsremaining at issue. The ALJ determined that the '348, ' 644, and ' 980 patents are valid but notinfringed and that the ' 114 patent is both invalid and not infringed. The ALJ further determinedthat the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement was satisfied with respect to theremaining asserted patents, but that the technical prong was not satisfied for any of those patents.On October 1, 2012, complainant Samsung and the Commission investigative attorney("lA") filed petitions for review of the ID, while Apple filed a contingent petition for review.On November 19, 2012, the Commission determined to review the ID in its entirety.77 Fed. Reg. 70464 (Nov. 26, 2012). The Commission issued a public notice requesting writtensubmissions from the parties and the public on various topics, many ofwhich concerned theCommission's authority to issue a remedy for the importation of articles that infringe patents thatthe patent owner has stated it will license on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory("FRAND") terms. Other topics concerned patent issues specific to this investigation. TheCommission received written submissions from Samsung, Apple, and the IA addressing all ofthe Commission's questions. In response to the FRAND-related topics posed to the public, the

    Commission received responses from the following: Association for Competitive Technology;Business Software Alliance; Ericsson Inc.; GTW Associates; Hewlett Packard Company;Innovation Alliance; Intel Corporation; Motorola Mobility LLC; Qualcomm Incorporated;Research In Motion Corporation; and Sprint Spectrum, L.P.On March 13 , 2013, the Commission issued another public notice requesting writtensubmissions from the parties and the public on various additional topics, including someFRAND-related topics. 78 Fed. Reg. 16865 (March 19, 2013). The Commission receivedwritten submissions from Samsung, Apple, and the lA addressing all of the Commission'squestions. In response to the FRAND-related topics posed to the public, the Commissionreceived responses from the following: Association for Competitive Technology; BusinessSoftware Alliance; Cisco Systems, Inc.; Hewlett Packard Company; Innovation Alliance; Micron

    Technology, Inc.; and Retail Industry Leaders Association.Having examined the record of this investigation, including the ALJ's final ID andsubmissions from the parties and from the public, the Commission has determined that Samsunghas proven a violation of section 337 based on atiicles that infringe claims 75-76 and 82-84 ofthe ' 348 patent. The Commission has determined to modify the ALJ's construction ofcertainterms in the asserted claims of the ' 348 patent, including "controller," " 10 bit TFCI

    2

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 8 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    9/22

    information," and "puncturing." Under the modified constructions, the Commission hasdetermined that Samsung has proven that the accused iPhone 4 (AT&T models); iPhone 3GS(AT&T models); iPhone 3 (AT&T models); iPad 3G (AT&T models); and iPad 2 3G (AT&Tmodels) infringe the asserted claims of the '348 patent. The Commission has further determinedthat the properly construed claims have not been proven by Apple to be invalid and that Samsunghas proven that a domestic industry exists in the United States with respect to the '348 patent.The Commission has determined that Apple failed to prove an affumative defense based onSamsung's FRAND declarations.

    The Commission has determined that Samsung has not proven a violation based onalleged infringement of the '644, '980, and '114 patents. With some modifications to the ALJ'sanalysis, the Commission has determined that the asserted claims of he '644 and '980 patentsare valid but not infringed and that the asserted claims of the '114 patent are not infringed andare invalid. The Commission bas fmther determined that Samsung did not prove a domesticindustry exists in the United States relating to articles protected by the '644, '980, and ' 114patents.

    The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is a limited exclusion orderand a cease and desist order prohibiting Apple from importing into the United States or selling ordistributing within the United States wireless communication devices, portable music and dataprocessing devices, and tablet computers that infringe claims 75-76 and 82-84 of the ' 348 patent.The Commission has determined that the public interest factors enumerated in section 337(d)(1)and (t)(l) do not preclude issuance of the limited exclusion order and cease and desist order.The Commission has determined that Samsung's FRAND declarations do not preclude thatremedy.

    Finally, the Commission has determined that a bond in the amount of zero percent of heentered value is required to permit temporary importation during the period ofPresidentialreview (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) ofwireless communication devices, portable music and dataprocessing devices, and tablet computers that are subject to the order. The Commission' s orderand opinion were delivered to the President and to the United States Trade Representative on theday of their issuance.

    Commissioner Pinkert dissents on public interest grounds from the determination to issuean exclusion order and cease and desist order.

    3

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 9 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    10/22

    The authority for the Commission's detetmination is contained in section 337 of heTariffAct of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 ofthe Commission's RulesofPractice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. Part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Lisa R. BartonActing Secretary to the Commission

    Issued: June 4, 2013

    4

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 10 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    11/22

    UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C.

    In the Matter ofCERTAIN ELECTRONIC DEVICES,INCLUDING WIRELESSCOMMUNICATION DEVICES,PORTABLE MUSIC AND DATAPROCESSING DEVICES, AND TABLETCOMPUTERS

    lnv. No. 337-TA-794

    LIMITED EXCLUSION ORDERThe Commission has determined that there is a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act

    of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the unlawful importation, sale for importation, andsale after importation by Respondent Apple, Inc. of certain electronic devices, including wirelesscommunication devices, portable music and data processing devices, and tablet computerscovered by one or more ofclaims 75-76 and 82-84 ofUnited States Patent No. 7,706,348 ("the'348 patent").

    Having reviewed the record of this investigation, including the written submissions of heparties and the public, the Commission has made its determination on the issues of remedy, thepublic interest, and bonding. The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of reliefis a limited exclusion order prohibiting the unlicensed entry of infringing electronic devices,including wireless communication devices, portable music and data processing devices, andtablet computers, manufactured for or on behalfofRespondent or any of its affiliated companies,parents, subsidiaries, licensees, or other related business entities, or their successors or assigns.

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 11 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    12/22

    The Commission has also determined that the public interest factors enumerated in19 U.S.C. 1337(d) do not preclude the issuance of he limited exclusion order, and that theRespondent may impmt without posting bond during the Presidential review period.

    Accordingly, the Commission hereby ORDERS that:1. Electronic devices, including wireless communication devices, portable music and

    data processing devices, and tablet computers, covered by one or more of claims75-76 and 82-84 of the ' 348 patent and that are manufactured abroad by or on behalfof, or imported by or on behalfof, Respondent or any of its affiliated companies,parents, subsidiaries, or other related business entities, or their successors or assigns,are excluded from entry for consumption into the United States, entry forconsumption from a foreign trade zone, or withdrawal from a warehouse forconsumption, for the remaining term of the patent, except under license of the patentowner or as provided by law, and except for refurbished articles imported on orbefore June 3, 2015, for use as a replacement for an identical article that wasimported prior to the date of his order.

    2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1 of this Order, the aforesaid electronic devices, includingwireless communication devices, portable music and data processing devices, andtablet computers are entitled to entry into the United States for consumption, entry forconsumption from a foreign-trade zone, or withdrawal from a warehouse forconsumption without posting bond, pursuant to subsection (j) of Section 337 (19U.S.C. 1337(j)) and the Presidential Memorandum for the United States TradeRepresentative ofJuly 21 , 2005 (70 Fed. Reg. 43,251), from the day after this Orderis received by the United States Trade Representative until such time as the United

    2

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 12 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    13/22

    States Trade Representative notifies the Commission that this Order is approved ordisapproved but, in any event, not later than sixty days after the date of receipt of thisOrder.

    3. At the discretion ofU.S. Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") and pursuant toprocedures that it establishes, persons seeking to import electronic devices, includingwireless communication devices, portable music and data processing devices, andtablet computers, that are potentially subject to this Order may be required to certifythat they are familiar with the terms of this Order, that they have made appropriateinquiry, and thereupon state that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, theproducts being imported are not excluded from entry under paragraph 1 of this Order.At its discretion, CBP may require persons who have provided the certificationdescribed in this paragraph to furnish such records or analyses as are necessary tosubstantiate the certification.

    4. In accordance with 19 U.S.C. 1337(1), the provisions of this Order shall not apply toelectronic devices, including wireless communication devices, portable music anddata processing devices, and tablet computers, imported by and for the use of theUnited States, or imported for, and to be used for, the United States with theauthorization or consent of he Government.

    5. The Commission may modify this Order in accordance with the procedures describedin section 210.76 ofthe Commission's Rules ofPractice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. 210.76).

    3

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 13 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    14/22

    6. The Secretary shall serve copies ofthis Order upon each party of record in thisinvestigation and upon the Department ofHealth and Human Services, theDepartment of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and CBP.

    7. Notice of this Order shall be published in the Federal Register.By order of the Commission.

    Lisa R. BartonActing Secretary to the Commission

    Issued: June 4, 2013

    4

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 14 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    15/22

    UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C.

    In the Matter ofCERTAIN ELECTRONIC DEVICES,INCLUDING WIRELESSCOMMUNICATION DEVICES,PORT ABLE MUSIC AND DATAPROCESSING DEVICES, AND TABLETCOMPUTERS

    Inv. No. 337-TA-794

    CEASE AND DESIST ORDERIT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014,

    cease and desist from conducting any of the following activities in the United States: impmiing,selling, marketing, advertising, distributing, transferring (except for exportation), and solicitingU.S. agents or distributors for, electronic devices, including wireless communication devices,portable music and data processing devices, and tablet computers, covered by one or more ofclaims 75-76 and 83-84 ofUnited States Patent No. 7,706,348 ("the '348 patent") in violation ofSection 337 of he TariffAct of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337).

    I.DefinitionsAs used in this order:(A) "Commission" shall mean the United States International Trade Commission.(B) "Complainants" shall mean San1sung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("SEC"), of Seoul,

    South Korea; and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC ("STA"), ofRichardson, Texas.

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 15 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    16/22

    (C) "Respondent" shall mean Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 950 14.(D) "Person" shall mean an individual, or any non-governmental partnership, firm,

    association, corporation, or other legal or business entity other than Respondent orits majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries, successors, or assigns.

    (E) "United States" shall mean the fifty States, the District ofColumbia, and PuertoRico.

    (F) The terms "imp01t" and "importation" refer to importation for entry forconsumption under the Customs laws of the United States.

    (G) The term "covered products" shall mean electronic devices, including wirelesscommunication devices, portable music and data processing devices, and tabletcomputers, covered by one or more of claims 75-76 and 82-84 of he ' 348 patent.Covered products shall not include articles for which a provision of law or licenseavoids liability for infringement ofclaims 75-76 and 82-84 of the ' 348 patent.

    II.ApplicabilityThe provisions of this Cease and Desist Order shall apply to Respondent and to any of its

    principals, stockholders, officers, directors, employees, agents, licensees, distributors, controlled(whether by stock ownership or otherwise) and majority-owned business entities, successors, andassigns, and to each of them, insofar as they are engaging in conduct prohibited by section III,infra, for, with, or otherwise on behalfof, Respondent.

    III.Conduct ProhibitedThe following conduct ofRespondent in the United States is prohibited by this Order.

    For the remaining term of the ' 348 patent, Respondent shall not:2

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 16 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    17/22

    (A) import or sell for importation into the United States covered products;(B) market, distribute, sell, or otherwise transfer (except for exportation), in the

    United States imported covered products;(C) advertise imported covered products;(D) solicit U.S. agents or distributors for imported covered products; or(E) aid or abet other entities in the importation, sale for importation, sale after

    importation, transfer, or distribution of covered products.IV.Conduct Permitted

    Notwithstanding any other provision of this Order, Respondent shall be permitted:(A) on or before June 3, 2015, to distribute refurbished covered articles for use as a

    replacement for an identical covered article that was imported prior to the date ofthis order;

    (B) to engage in specific conduct otherwise prohibited by the terms of this Order if, ina written instrument, the owner of the '348 patent licenses or authorizes suchspecific conduct; or

    (C) to engage in specific conduct otherwise prohibited by the terms of this Order ifsuch specific conduct is related to the importation or sale of covered products byor for the United States.

    v.ReportingFor purposes of this requirement, the reporting periods shall commence on February 1 of

    each year and shall end on the subsequent January 31. The first report required under thissection shall cover the period from the date of issuance ofthis order through January 31,2014.

    3

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 17 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    18/22

    This reporting requirement shall continue in force until such time as Respondent hastruthfully reported, in two consecutive timely filed reports, that it has no inventory of coveredproducts in the United States.

    Within thirty (30) days of the last day of the reporting period, Respondent shall report tothe Commission: (a) the quantity in units and the value in dollars ofcovered products that it has(i) imported and/or (ii) sold in the United States after importation during the reporting period,and (b) the quantity in units and value in dollars of reported covered products that remain ininventory in the United States at the end of the reporting period. When fi ling writtensubmissions, Respondent must file the original document electronically on or before thedeadlines stated above and submit eight (8) true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary bynoon the next day pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules ofPractice andProcedure (19 C.P.R. 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the investigation number("lnv. No. 337-TA-794") in a prominent place on the cover pages and/or the first page. (SeeHandbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/ruleslhandbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing shouldcontact the Secretary (202-205-2000). IfRespondent desires to submit a document to theCommission in confidence, it must file the original and a public version of the original with theOffice of the Secretary and must serve a copy of the confidential version on Complainants'counsel.1

    1 Complainants must fi le a letter with the Secretary identifying the attorney to receive reports and bondinformation associated with this order. The designated attorney must be on the protective order entered in theinvestigation.

    4

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 18 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    19/22

    Any failure to make the required report or the filing of any false or inaccurate report shallconstitute a violation of this Order, and the submission of a false or inaccurate report may berefened to the U.S. Department of Justice as a possible criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001.

    VI.Record-Keeping and Inspection(A) For the purpose of securing compliance with this Order, Respondent shall retain

    any and all records relating to the sale, offer for sale, marketing, or distribution inthe United States ofcovered products, made and received in the usual andordinary course of business, whether in detail or in summary form, for a period ofthree (3) years from the close of the fiscal year to which they pertain.

    (B) For the purposes ofdetermining or securing compliance with this Order and forno other purpose, subject to any privilege recognized by the federal courts of theUnited States, and upon reasonable written notice by the Commission or its staff,duly authorized representatives of the Commission shall be permitted access andthe right to inspect and copy, in Respondent's principal offices during officehours, and in the presence of counsel or other representatives ifRespondent sochooses, all books, ledgers, accounts, correspondence, memoranda, and otherrecords and documents, in detail and in summary form, that must be retainedunder subparagraph VI(A) of this Order.

    vn.Service of Cease and Desist OrderRespondent is ordered and directed to:(A) Serve, within fifteen days after the effective date of this order, a copy of this

    Order upon each of its respective officers, directors, managing agents, agents, and5

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 19 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    20/22

    employees who have any responsibility for the importation, marketing,distribution, or sale of imported covered products in the United States;

    (B) Serve, within fifteen days after the succession of any persons referred to insubparagraph VII(A) of this order, a copy of the order upon each successor; and

    (C) Maintain such records as will show the name, title, and address of each personupon whom the order has been served, as described in subparagraphs VII( A) andVII(B) of this order, together with the date on which service was made.

    The obligations set forth in subparagraphs VII(B) and VII(C) shall remain in effect untilthe' 348 patent expires.

    VIII.ConfidentialityAny request for confidential treatment of information obtained by the Commission

    pursuant to section VI of this order should be made in accordance with section 201.6 of theCommission's Rules ofPractice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. 201.6). For all reports for whichconfidential treatment is sought, Respondent must provide a public version of such report withconfidential information redacted.

    IX.Enforcement

    Violation of this order may result in any ofthe actions specified in section 210.75 of theCommission' s Rules ofPractice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. 210.75), including an action forcivil penalties under section 337(t) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337(t)), as well asany other action that the Commission deems appropriate. In determining whether Respondent isin violation of this order, the Commission may infer facts adverse to Respondent if it fails toprovide adequate or timely information.

    6

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 20 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    21/22

    X.ModificationThe Commission may amend this order on its own motion or in accordance with the

    procedure described in section 210.76 of the Commission's Rules ofPractice and Procedure(19 C.F.R. 210.76).

    XI.BondingThe conduct prohibited by section III of this order may be continued during the sixty-day

    period in which this order is under review by the United States Trade Representative, asdelegated by the President (70 Fed. Reg. 43,251 (Jul. 21 , 2005)), without Respondent posting abond.

    By order of the Commission.

    Lisa R. BartonActing Secretary to the Commission

    Issued: June 4, 2013

    7

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 21 Filed: 07/19/2013

  • 8/22/2019 13-07-19 Samsung Notice of Appeal of Unfavorable Parts of ITC Ruling

    22/22

    CERTAIN ELECTRONIC DEVICES, INCLUDING WIRELESS lnv. No. 337-TA-794COMMUNICATION DEVICES, PORTABLE MUSIC AND DATAPROCESSING DEVICES, AND TABLET COMPUTERSPUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached NOTICE has been served by handupon, the Commission Investigative Attorney, Lisa Murray, Esq., and the following parties asindicated on June 4, 2013. ~ : : >iSaR:Baf.to; , xc i l l iSecretaryU.S. International Trade Commission500 E Street, SW, Room 112Washington, DC 20436

    On Behalf of Complainants Samsung Electronics., Ltd.and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC:S. Alex Lasher, Esq.QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NWWashington, DC 20004On Behalfof Respondent Apple Inc.:Nina S. Tallon, Esq.WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORRLLP1875 Pennsylvania A venue, NWWashington, DC 20006

    ( ) Via Hand Delivery( 'J Via Overnight Delivery( ) Via First Class Mail( ) Other:_____( ) Via Hand Delivery("'-,) Via Overnight Delivery( ) Via First Class Mail( ) Other:____

    Case: 13-1519 Document: 1-3 Page: 22 Filed: 07/19/2013