12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory 1 A low-power delta-sigma modulator A low-power delta-sigma modulator using dynamic-source-follower integrators using dynamic-source-follower integrators Ryoto Yaguchi, Fumiyuki Adachi, Waho Ryoto Yaguchi, Fumiyuki Adachi, Waho Takao Takao Department of Information and Communication Department of Information and Communication Sciences Sciences Sophia University Sophia University
26
Embed
12/14/2010Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory 1 A low-power delta-sigma modulator using dynamic-source-follower integrators Ryoto.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory 1
2nd-order noise shaping characteristics are obtained!!
40dB
/dec
Input Frequency [kHz] 20Sampling rate [MS/ s] 5.285
Point 8192
FFT Condition
1k 10k 100k 1M 10M-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
SNR [dB] 73.75ENOB [bit] 11.96Power [μW] 27.38
FOM [pJ / conv] 0.172
FFT Result
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory18
Performance ComparisonPerformance Comparison
Proposed 0.18-m, 2nd-order modulator has a good power efficiency comparable with those obtained by using 0.13-m
technologies.
2009 2009 2009 2009 2008
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory19
ConclusionConclusion
We proposed a dynamic source-follower integrator (DSFI), and applied it to opamp-less modulators.
Operation of proposed 1st and 2nd order modulators designed by using a 0.18-m CMOS technology successfully was confirmed by transistor-level circuit simulation.
The designed 20-kHz BW, 73.8dB SNR, 2nd-order modulator has a good power efficiency comparable with those obtained by using 0.13-m technologies.
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory20
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory21
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory22
Output Common-mode Voltage
Output Common-mode Voltage VCM[V] ENOB [bit]
Calculating / Matlab 0.9 14.36
Pass Transistor 0.826 11.96
Ideal Switch 0.881 12.37
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory23
CMRR at DSFI
)(2
1)( VVAVVAV CMdout
)/log(20 CMd AACMRR
・Output equation of typical differential amplifier :
・ CMRR:
Inp
ut
p [
V]
Inp
ut
p [
V]
Ou
tpu
t [V
]O
utp
ut
[V]
Inp
ut
n [
V]
Inp
ut
n [
V]
Inp
ut
p [
V]
Inp
ut
p [
V]
Ou
tpu
t [V
]O
utp
ut
[V]
Inp
ut
n [
V]
Inp
ut
n [
V]
Time [s]Time [s]Time [s]Time [s]
VV+++V+V--=0=0 VV++-V-V--=0=0
CMRR is very good!!
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory
Clock Generators
Non-overlap clock generator TFF-clock generator
Ou
tpu
tO
utp
ut
TimeTime TimeTime
Ou
tpu
tO
utp
ut
Inp
ut
Inp
ut
Inp
ut
Inp
ut
Generate φ1,φ2 Generate φ2a,φ2b
Q:Q: For example, what about any digital circuits you needed to control switches?
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory
modulator power consumptionmodulator power consumption
22ndnd DSFI DSFI47.1%47.1%11stst DSFI DSFI
41.6%41.6%
Comparator 3.7%Comparator 3.7%
Clock Generators 7.1%Clock Generators 7.1%
Others 0.5%Others 0.5%Q:Q: In your power consumption estimation, what kinds of circuits are included?
*)Without the referential voltage generators
12/14/2010 Sophia University Solid –State Circuits & Devices Laboratory
Comparison FairnessComparison Fairness
We have to examine the comparison on experimental measurement, hereafter!!
Q: Q: You compared your simulation results with the experimental results. Is this a fair comparison?