12 . Dark matter halo * Spherical Collapse model of halo formation Assuming Einstein de - Seer Universe ( Rail ) ( result holds for general case as well ) o An isolated spherical over dense region of she R ; & density contrast Oi Outside → spherically symmetric distribution of matter ⇒ Birkhoff thm : dynamics of the region determined only by inside material ma ' GR Version of Newton 's spherical shell theorem Total mass M = 45¥ echo , ) A = cosmic mean density @ ti , = 6¥42 H ; = ¥ equation of motion : ITT = - GYES ( RH : site of the region at time t ) = - 45¥ RIICHODIE = Hi¥ 7 ( Ita ) 3 energy equation : IR - of = Ile - the top =E if Kzttirifo ⇒ expanding forever C no collapse THY ? ) Ri < Hike ⇒ reallapse a ten HIRICHQ ) = - 1¥43 C Hoi ) ⇒ Rma = t the .DK ' Set Ri=HiR ; C following the Hubble How ) → [ = - HMI o ; ; Rmax = ( t¥)R , ± Rta Cta . turnaround ) - Solution of Eom → Cycloid ! ! R - Rt÷ ( l - Gso ) i t : TTE ( O smo )
13
Embed
12 Dark Spherical Collapse model of Seer Rail well 45¥ · PDF file* Spherical Collapse model of halo formation ... -equation of motion: ITT =-GYES ( RH: site of the region ... But
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
12.
Dark matter halo
* Spherical Collapse model of halo formation
Assuming Einstein de - Seer Universe ( Rail ) ( result holds for general case as well.
)
o An isolated spherical over denseregion of she R; & density contrast Oi
Outside → spherically symmetric distribution of matter .
⇒ Birkhoff thm .
: dynamics of the regiondetermined only by inside material
.
ma' GR Version of Newton 's spherical shell theorem
.
Total mass M =45¥echo , )
A = cosmic mean density @ ti ,= 6¥42 H ;
= ¥- equation of motion : ITT = - GYES ( RH : site of the region at time t )
= - 45¥
RIICHODIE
= . Hi¥7 ( Ita )3
energy equation : IR - of = Ile - the top =E
if Kzttirifo⇒ expanding forever Cno collapseTHY? )
It OH =FCHod÷t.at#sEXf=u+o..sftEMtt3..a+oil:I*oMETosI3teioEIi+ooi
,
T
0¥Z T Font Rea = HE Ct coso , )
⇒ coso,
= II ,smo ; - T÷
to ;
i) at early times Ct=tD
to ±Itf +9T ) ~ 1+302
¥,
= effort :p )shoo '
. ¥[at⇒By= seat:*linear solution ! )
ii ) at turn around
Hota ± I . ¥ ± bets → already non -linear ! !
iii)
0=2'T → collapse to f= o ( 12=0 ) !
But in reality .the
region will be unatzed C via violent relaxation )mm
2Ekt - Ep
E
= Ep + Et = - Ek = Es ⇐ Ep ( at turn around ) = EE ( at viridization )
Epa YR ⇒ Rta '
' 2 Rvirid
Assuming vindication happens at 0=27 ( tuir = Hea )
Hair = u+o⇒fI÷Mr÷f=C#dftt÷HF÷f
= FIX 4×8 = 178 ( vkkl over density ! !)
~-2°o_! !
Corresponding" linear density contrast
' '
= Ea(#%=EoiYdIk0Pfns±EoiHoiP 's
cosmos"
a }o , HOFF Co - and"
= }(}d% ( 0*0513
at vlvklitatim ,&
A = Este) "
ftp.T (3125's
=t6864
±-
- Collapsing threshold ( critical density ) in other world models
i ) open CDM Universe ( data - - GMT : but Hubble rate different )
A = 1.686 KmC tur ) ]00185
it flat . BCDM Universe ( ¥T .
- . Gfft÷r )
fc = 1.686 [ Rnctur ) ]000$
: fat 1.686 for all realistic world models !
- Implication :
If dark matter halos form through spherical collapse , instea¥
following Its nonlinear collapse usingN -
body simulations,
we can
approximately find the collapsed spherical halos from the linear density held .
That is, if few , -4 = fc ( ~ 1.686) a spherical
regionforms a halo
.
�1�
00 At early times,
( fi > = Rs (xD% ))the amplitude of fluctuation is small
,VWHNNHMM& chance of forming halos of given mass
is tower.
0000 At later times,
R 'is larger ,MMNNNM
→ chance of forming halo is higher .
�2� At a given time, density fluctuation of spherical region
MR )
is smaller for large R ( high mass halos) .
⇒ high mass halos are ra±mm
* Recipe of findinghalos from
given linear density held.
Six ) face
5.1.2. Press-Schechter formalismLet us start the discussion from recapping the original derivation of Press-Schechter mass function (Press
& Schechter, 1974).Here, the key assumptions are A) the initial matter density �(x) contrast follows Gaussianstatistics and B) a Lagrangian (initial) region (volume V ) with linear density contrast (extrapolated to theepoch of interest) exceeding the threshold value �c are self-bounded to form a galaxy. Then, the fraction ofLagrangian volume belongs to the galaxies of mass greater than M = ⇢̄MV is given by
PG(� > �G) =1
p
2⇡�(R)2
Z 1
�c
d� exp
�1
2
�2
�(R)2
�
=1
2erfc
�cp2�(R)
�
. (5.11)
Here, the complementary error function is defined as
erfc = 1 � erf(x) =2p⇡
Z 1
xe�u2
du, (5.12)
R is the Lagrangian radius corresponding to the halo mass M
M = 3.1389 ⇥ 1011✓
⌦m
0.27
◆ ✓
R
[Mpc/h]
◆3
M�/h, (5.13)
and �(R) is a root-mean-squared value of the linear density fluctuation smoothed over radius R:
�2(R) =1
2⇡2
Z 1
0
dk k2P (k)W2R(k) . (5.14)
As the Lagrangian volume fraction is equivalent to the fraction of total mass enclosed in the halos of massgreater than M , with the mass function n(M) we write
PG(> M) = PG(� > �c) =1
⇢̄M
Z 1
MdM 0M 0n(M 0) =
1
2erfc
�cp2�(R)
�
, (5.15)
from which we find an expression for the mass function:
n(M) = � ⇢̄MM
dPG(> M)
dM. (5.16)
One problem here is, however, that integrating over masses inside all halos recovers only half of the totalmass:
Z 1
0
dMMn(M) = �⇢̄M
Z 1
0
dMdPG
dM= �⇢̄M [PG(R = 1) � PG(R = 0)] =
1
2⇢̄M . (5.17)
Here, we use the hierarchical density field without any cuto↵: �(R ! 0) ! 1, and �(R ! 1) ! 0. Thatis, the mass function we calculated above is not properly normalized. Press and Schechter [40], therefore,had to introduce an ad hoc, ‘fudge’ factor of two which reads the Press-Schechter mass function:
nPS(M) = �2⇢̄MM
dPG
dM=
⇢̄MM2
r
2
⇡⌫e�⌫2/2
�
�
�
�
dln�(R)
dlnM
�
�
�
�
, (5.18)
where ⌫ = �c/�(R) is the significance of the critical density relative to the r.m.s. variance of matterfluctuations In the literature one often finds the halo mass function in the form of
n(M) =⇢̄MM2
⌫f(⌫)
�
�
�
�
dln�(R)
dlnM
�
�
�
�
, (5.19)
Here, ⌫f(⌫) is the multiplicity function. In Press-Schechter theory, this is
⌫fPS(⌫) =
r
2
⇡⌫e�⌫2/2 . (5.20)
In principle, ⌫f(⌫) could depends on variables other than the peak significance. This is the case of densitypeaks for instance (see §6). However, when the multiplicity function depends solely on ⌫, the halo massfunction can be scaled to a universal (self-similar) form which is independent of cosmology, redshift andpower spectrum (Sheth & Tormen, 1999; Jenkins et al., 2001)
52
mm . " ;:÷ItiE.tw?uEnYEe*#Q⇒ number density of smoothedregions
= Yv=£:- 4¥ Rim
ja , ,slutty
( Wrck )=3PtgkRX ) as
- Press - Schechter mass function & Simulated mass function
⇒ Sheth - Tomen mass function C Sheth & Tomen 1999)
ofin =AF¥[ iff ] EH ( d= 0.707, Pio . } )
from f mean )dm = F → At 0.3222 ( PS ⇒ di 1
, p - o,A=k )
Note :
5TH defines
w= ( %)'
!
E) Jenkins et .
al. God )
ST
:
:
miFOF ' friends . of - friends )
solid line : mm ) = ¥slddhudm/ far )
& FCM ) = 0.301 exp [ . llnot +0.641388 ]
( -0.96 E but ' E 1.0)
* Universality of mass fn.
non ) = ni rfu ) I ghfmI|
with his GIdepending on D= £4, regardless of cosmology
,red shift
,. . .
.
( Jenkins +2
:fu) = 0.315 ( - 1 but '+0.61138 )
( -1.2 Elmo '
'
E 1.05 )
*
"
The"
factor of two.
psmoothed
dens'tfield
bn PS theory , we identify PCS >fc ) as the fraction of initial
Lagrangianvolume which belongs
¥halos of mass M > 455123.
→ result = normalization off by afactor of 2
.
fodmmf Edelmann ) = ts ! !
.
summingover all mass in halo
=
( why? )
%÷%'%OCR , ) 71.68
{o ( k ) < 1.68
⇒ excursion set theory ( Bond et al . 2001 )
halo of mass m forms at z if" the trajectoriesthat are above the threshold Scots at some mass scale
mnmtdm but are below ACA at ALL LARGER VALUES of m ?
Trajectories:p
CH) = fd3y fcg , Way ,⇒ Sick) - SCKTW
,#
you To ktsmoothingkernel
smoothed original
density fielddensity held
smoothing kernels :
:) sharp - k filter WRCA '
- Iha (3519%0) : Wrdg = 04 - KR)
ii ) spherical toftttwpcx , =*÷* of . Ie) ; WRCH =3%t"¥