Radical Honoursty P O Box 5042 George East, 6539 Tel: (071) 170 1954 MAIL & GUARDIAN Editor: Mr. Nick Dawes Dear Mail & Guardian / Mr. Nick Dawes, Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership. ‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
20
Embed
12-02-28: Media (21-30): Problem Solving vs. Parasite Leeching Survey
12-02-28: Media (21-30): Problem Solving vs. Parasite Leeching Survey: Mail & Guardian | Politics Web | Pretoria News | Rapport | Radio Sonder Grense | Saturday Star | Sowetan | Sunday Independent | Sunday Times | Volksblad
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Radical Honoursty
P O Box 5042 George East, 6539
Tel: (071) 170 1954
MAIL & GUARDIAN Editor: Mr. Nick Dawes Dear Mail & Guardian / Mr. Nick Dawes,
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.
POLITICSWEB Editor: Mr. James Myburgh Dear Politicsweb Ed. / Mr. Myburgh,
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.
RAPPORT Editor: Ms. Lisa Albrecht Dear Rapport Ed. / Ms. Albrecht,
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.
SATURDAY STAR Editor: Mr. Brendan Seery Dear Saturday Star Ed. / Mr. Brendan Seery,
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.
SUNDAY INDEPENDENT Editor: Mr. Makhudu Sefara Dear Sunday Independent / Mr. Sefara,
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.
SUNDAY TIMES Editor: Mr. Ray Hartley Dear Sunday Times / Mr.Hartley,
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.
VOLKSBLAD Editor: Mr. Ainsley Moos Dear Volksblad Ed. / Mr. Moos
Problem Solving Leadership Survey: Request for Information: Articles focussed on Problem Solving Leadership Individuals or Organisations I am in the process of researching Problem Solving Leadership, what it is, and is not; and how it is different from Parasite Leeching (Fake Problem Solving) Leadership. I am attempting to determine South African Media (Editors and Journalists) level of commitment, understanding, interest and reportage specifically focussed on Problem Solving leadership.
‘If I had one hour to save the world I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem and only five minutes finding the solution.’ – Albert Einstein
Definition / Put Simply: Problem solving leadership only acts towards solving any problem to enable the problem to be clearly and succinctly defined. Fanclubs and followers are eschewed, advice and suggestions towards clearly defining the problem are accepted based purely on merit of the suggestions, irrespective of individuals social-standing.
Parasitical Leeching Leadership generally choose some kind of ideology whereby they vaguely and ambiguously pretend to solve vague and abstract problems; while the predominant motive is to grow themselves a fan club/following, for their own socio-political or economic benefit. Their Parasite Leadership ‘problem solving’ deliberately avoids any focus on clearly defining any problem, or any investigation of the root cause of the problem. Their primary focus is to divert their fan clubs attention towards the symptoms of the problem, using emotional blame game language focussed on another Parasitical Leeching Leaders fan club. Such Parasitical Leeching leaders – like WWF Wrestlers – thereby entrench the Parasitical Leeching Leadership paradigm (Fake Left Wing v Right Wing Political Paradigm Explained1). Put differently: The bath is overflowing, Parasitical Leeching Leaders focus their fan club on endlessly mopping up the floor; who is mopping, who isn’t, etc. All attention towards defining the problem as the running tap is strictly avoided, including vilifying anyone who even mentions the possibility of a tap leaking being the source of the problem. The focus is to perpetuate the problem indefinitely while socio-politically exploiting the problem for personal gain, by means of manipulating the emotions of ‘followers’, related to the symptoms of the problem. Ninety-Nine percent of the worlds so-called ‘leadership’ is PARASITE LEECHING LEADERSHIP.
Survey Questions:
1. What is your Publication / Editorial definition of leadership?
2. Do you recognize the difference between Problem Solving Leadership and Parasitical Leeching Leadership?
3. Has your publication covered any individuals or organisations focussed on Problem Solving Leadership, and if so, a list of the articles that did so.