Top Banner

of 17

11e-Ch15s

Apr 02, 2018

Download

Documents

Yen Yen Nicolas
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    1/17

    THE REGULATORY PROCESS

    Chapter 15

    The rise of the administration bodies

    probably has been the most significantlegal trend of the last century and

    perhaps more values today are affected

    by their decisions than by those of all

    the courts . . . .They have become a

    veritable fourth branch of the

    government. . . . Supreme Court in F.T.C.

    v. Ruberoid Company(1952)

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    2/17

    The Rise of

    Administrative Agencies

    The first federal agency: The Interstate Commerce

    Commission (ICC,1887)

    Early 1900s: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the

    Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

    1930s: Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) and Federal

    Communications Commission (FCC)

    1960s & 1970s: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Equal

    Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and

    Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA)

    Agencies: Tools for local, state & federal regulatory functions

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    3/17

    Creating An Administrative Agency

    Congress gives an agency power &

    authority through legislative

    delegation

    Congress delegates powerto the

    agency to perform the regulatory

    purpose

    Congressional statute delegates

    powers anenabling statute

    Agencies are created to have

    expertise and supervision over

    special problems about which

    Congress is concerned

    If voters unhappy with regulations,

    the can pressure representatives in

    Congress to make changes

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    4/17

    Administrative Law

    Administrative law consists of legal rules that define

    authority & structure of an agency

    Sources include

    Enabling statutes of administrative agencies

    Administrative Procedures Act (APA, 1946)

    Rules issued by administrative agencies

    Court decisions Review validity of agency actions The structure of administrative law created by the APA

    An agency must abide by APA requirements

    Congress may impose different requirements than APA

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    5/17

    ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATORY

    POWERS

    Legislative (or Rulemaking)

    Investigative

    Adjudicatory

    Enforcement Part of the powers of all

    three branches of

    government are

    incorporated into anagency

    See Exhibit 15.2

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    6/17

    Rule Making Formal rulesand regulat ions

    Informal pol icy guidance documents

    Substantive or Legislative

    Same force as statutes of Congress

    Agency usually must give public notice of these rules so parties

    have opportunity for written comment

    Interpretative

    Issued by an agency to give guidance regarding interpretation of

    a substantive rule or statute

    May be created without public notice

    Procedural

    Rules outline the method of agency operation

    Procedures for enforcement, investigation & adjudicatory review

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    7/17

    Rulemaking Procedure

    Proposed rule drafted by the agency staff

    Internal review of proposed rule

    Rules approved by the head of the agency for public consideration

    Publishing of the proposed rules in the Federal Register

    Interested parties may submit written comments to agency After public comment period (60-90 days), agency reviews comments

    and finalizes the rule

    Some statutes require rulemaking must be on the record. Agency

    must hold hearings for witnesses to testify about proposed rule.

    Once agency issues final rule, it may be appealed through agency, thento the U.S. Court of Appeals

    Courts uphold rules if reasonable given language of authorizing statute

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    8/17

    Chevron , USA v. Natu ral

    Resources Defense Counc i l

    The Clean Air Act requires states with nonattainment (dirty air)

    areas to create permit program

    Program regulates new or modified major stationary sources of

    air pollution

    EPA regs. state a plant with multiple sources of pollution aretreated as one source of pollution

    The Bubble Concept as if multiple sources are under bubble

    The whole bubble is measured (rather than each source)

    National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) challenged EPAs

    Bubble Rule

    Said rule was inconsistent with Clean Air Act

    Court of Appeals overturned the EPA regulation

    Decision was appealed

    Continued

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    9/17

    Chevron , USA v. Natural Resources

    Defense Counci l , cont.

    HELD: Reversed. Regulation is appropriate. Two questions asked:

    1. Has Congress directly spoken to the precise question at issue?

    2. If statute is silent or ambiguous re: an issue, was the agencys

    answer based on permissible construction of the statute?

    Agencies allowed to fill gaps left by Congress Unless agency decisions are arbitrary, capricious or manifestly

    contrary to statute, regulations given controlling weight

    Legislative delegation may be implicit or explicit often implicit

    Court usually defers to administrative interpretations

    Question is not whether the bubble concept is inappropriate

    Question is if Administrators view is appropriate and reasonable

    regarding the Bubble Program

    EPAs use of the concept is reasonable policy for it to make.

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    10/17

    Enforcing Rules

    Gathering information and investigating violations

    Broad investigative powers of agencies by:

    Monitoring and self reporting by business

    Business is concerned with 5th Amendmentviolations re: self incrimination

    Direct observation by agency

    See Dow Chem ical v. U.S. (within text)

    Agency obtains information through subpoena power Directs person receiving subpoena to appear and

    testify or to produce documents

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    11/17

    General Principles of 4th Amendment Search &

    Seizure Guidelines of Administrative Agencies

    Need WarrantRoutineinspections

    No WarrantOpen fieldobservation

    No Warrant Consent bymanagement for agency tolook over or search thepremises

    No Warrant Closelyregulated industries, i.e.

    Pharmaceuticals industry

    Nuclear facility

    Even junk yards (ifprotection of evidence

    needed)

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    12/17

    Enforcement Power

    Agencies have array of enforcement tools in civil and criminalpenalties, plus the use of injunctions

    Possible sanctions:

    Prohibitions, requirements, limitations

    Withholding of relief; penalties & fines

    Destruction, taking, seizing, withholding of property

    Assessment of damages, reimbursements, restitution,

    compensation, costs, charges or fees

    Requirement, revocation, suspension of license

    Informal procedures (i.e. tests, inspections, permits,negotiations, advice, settlements)

    Formal procedures (i.e. adjudicatory hearings that may lead

    to litigation)

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    13/17

    Adjudicatory Hearing

    Formal agency process under APA rules Similar to those followed in a trial

    Business must respond to complaint that alleges

    violation of agency regulation

    Adm inistrat ive Law Judge (ALJ)presides ALJ is a civil service employee who is usually an

    attorney

    Witnesses may be cross examined

    Less formal than a court trial

    Hearing must meet due process guarantees of the

    Constitution

    There is no right to trial by jury

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    14/17

    Judicial Review

    APA sets out procedural requirements for court review Jurisdiction is needed by the court to hear the case

    Action must be reviewable by the courts (review may be

    prohibited by statute, i.e. VA actions regarding benefits for

    veterans, dependents or survivors) Party must have standing to seek court review of an

    agency action

    See Lu jan v. Defenders o f Wildl i fe(within text)

    The agency action must be final to warrant judicial reviewunder the ripeness doctrine

    Parties must complete all agency appeals before turning

    to the courts under the exhaustion doctrine

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    15/17

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    16/17

    Reviewability

    Review of substantive determination

    Courts usually yield to agencys

    judgment unless decisions are

    arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse

    of discretion or rulemaking is

    vague or unduly burdensome on

    business

    Review prohibited by Statute

    Congress may specify in the

    statute which court has

    jurisdiction for review

    Can prohibit certain judicial

    review

    Review of statutory

    interpretation

    Courts determine if the

    agency has gone beyond

    Congressional authority

    Review of procedural

    requirements

    Courts ensure an agency

    has not acted unfairly or

    disregarded procedures(has not violated

    procedural fair play)

  • 7/27/2019 11e-Ch15s

    17/17

    CONTROLS ON AGENCY POWERS

    Direct Controls

    Congressional budget process

    Agency Appropriations & Reporting Requirements

    Cost-Benefit and Risk Analysis

    Example: Office of Management and Budget may sendproposed regulation back to agency if scientific, technicaland economic information standards are not met

    Presidential Executive Orders instructing tasks tobe undertaken by agencies

    Example: Pres. Johnsons order to agencies re: affirmativeaction programs

    Indirect Controls

    Freedom of Information Act

    Privacy Act

    Government in the Sunshine Act