Top Banner
" Two studies " An observational study ! Why do female caribou have antlers? " A field experiment ! What are the effects of hydroelectric development on migratory caribou? Ecologist at Work
28
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

" Two studies

" An observational study

! Why do female caribou have antlers?

" A field experiment

! What are the effects of hydroelectricdevelopment on migratory caribou?

Ecologist at Work

Page 2: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Caribou and reindeer

One species, Rangifer tarandus

W.R. Darby

Page 3: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Caribou and reindeer

A species in decline

Vors & Boyce (2009) Global Change Biology 15: 2626-2633

Page 4: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

" A feature of the family Cervidae

" Deciduous, branched, entirely ofbone when fully developed! Originate from pedicel of frontal

bone! When growing, covered in

velvet.

What are antlers?

Page 5: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

“The heavy energetic costs of annualantler renewal ... indicate that if antlersdid not afford their possessors someimportant advantage, selection wouldquickly suppress them.”

Functions of antlers?

A fascinating evolutionary problem

Clutton-Brock (1982) Behaviour 79:108

Page 6: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Functions of antlers?

! Males – used in intraspecific combat

" Monopolize matings with females

Page 7: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

" Caribou females possess antlers! Unique among deer species

" Propensity of females to carry antlersvaries among caribou populations ! A polymorphic trait

Functions of antlers on females?

Caribou are a useful test case

Page 8: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

" Female defense hypothesis! Defend against predators

" Andromimicry hypothesis! Mimic their young male offspring –

less likely to be ejected from groupby dominant males

" Resource defense hypothesis! Defend food from conspecifics.

Function of horn-like organs on female ungulates

Tentative explanations

Page 9: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

" Aggressive displacements at feeding sites by caribou

! Snow-free: 0.3/animal/h

! Snowcover: 2.2/animal/h

Interference competition

Barrette & Vandal (1986) Behaviour 97:118-146

Page 10: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

A prediction

" Resource defense hypothesis

! Proportion of female caribou with antlers will be positivelycorrelated to snow depth and duration.

Page 11: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

An observational study

15 caribou herds in Newfoundland & Labrador

Page 12: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

" Population density and sex structure, 1957-1996

! Percentage of females with antlers, October to April

" Climatic normals, 1960-1990

! Total annual snow fall

! Months with >25 cm snowcover

! Snow depth at the end of March.

The data

From field observations and climate records

Page 13: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Schaefer & Mahoney (2001) Ecology 12:3556

Page 14: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Dealing with potentially confounding variables

Variable A Variable Bis correlated with

Variable C

An issue in observational studies

Page 15: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Dealing with potentially confounding variables

Antlers Snowis correlated with

Populationdensity

An issue in observational studies

Page 16: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Dealing with potentially confounding variables

Control for them statistically

Schaefer & Mahoney (2001) Ecology 12:3556

Page 17: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

" Female defense hypothesis

! Calf hiding behaviour is notuncommon

" Andromimicry hypothesis

! Females retain their antlers longerthan young males.

Rival hypotheses

Page 18: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Antlers on female caribou

“The most convincing evidence offemale weaponry being used incontest for limited feeding sites”

Roberts (1996) Behaviour 133:399

Page 19: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Caribou and reindeer

A species in decline

Vors & Boyce (2009) Global Change Biology 15: 2626-2633

Page 20: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Effects of hydroelectric development?

Page 21: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Effects of hydroelectric development?

Extent of avoidance of human-caused disturbances

Page 22: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

A field experiment

Buchans caribou herd and the Star Lake development

Newfoundland

0 25 km

Buchans caribouBU 1043

Star Lake

" 15 mW powerhouse! 18 m high dam! 45 km transmission

line! 9.3 km2 flooding

" Construction! May 1997 to

September 1998

" The project = anexperiment

Page 23: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

" Hypothesis

! Such industrial projects cause functional lossof habitat, well beyond its strict bounds

" Prediction

! During construction, migration will bedisrupted

! During and after construction, caribou willexhibit reduced use of the project vicinity.

Hypothesis and predictions

Page 24: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Rank order of migration

Consistent year-to-year

Mahoney & Schaefer (2002) Biological Conservation 107:147

Page 25: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Rank order of migration

Temporarily disrupted during construction

Duringconstruction

Mahoney & Schaefer (2002) Biological Conservation 107:147

Page 26: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Avoidance of the development

" 50% habitat loss atleast 3 km fromproject

Mahoney & Schaefer (2002) Biological Conservation 107:147

Page 27: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Effects of hydroelectric development?

Extent of avoidance of human-caused disturbances

Page 28: 1020 Ecologist at Work BB

Adaptive management

Treat each industrial development as an experiment

Plan & do

Evaluate & adjust