Top Banner
04/07/22 Tools for Continuous Improvement and LEAN Manufacturing An Introduction to the Principles of Lean Manufacturing
48

10/08/2014

Feb 09, 2016

Download

Documents

Rafi

Tools for Continuous Improvement and LEAN Manufacturing. An Introduction to the Principles of Lean Manufacturing. 10/08/2014. Agenda. Review brief history of manufacturing systems Distinguish between mass, craft and lean manufacturing Introduce key Concepts of Lean Manufacturing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 10/08/2014

22/04/23

Tools for Continuous Improvement and LEAN Manufacturing

An Introduction to the Principles of Lean Manufacturing

Page 2: 10/08/2014

Agenda

• Review brief history of manufacturing systems• Distinguish between mass, craft and lean

manufacturing• Introduce key Concepts of

Lean Manufacturing • Review the kinds of changes needed to be

considered a lean manufacturer.

Page 3: 10/08/2014

Readings

• Chapter 18 of Computer Aided Manufacturing II, Wang, H.P., Chang, T.C. and Wysk, R. A., Edition (2007 expected) http://www.engr.psu.edu/cim/ie450/ie450ho1.pdf

• “Building the Lean Machine,” Advanced Manufacturing, January 2000.http://www.engr.psu.edu/cim/ie450/buildingthelean.pdf

Page 4: 10/08/2014

Objectives

• To identify waste elements in a system• To apply value stream analysis to a complex

engineering/manufacturing system• To implement 3 M’s in a complex engineering

environment• To be able to identify and implement the 5Ss of

lean

Page 5: 10/08/2014

Craft Manufacturing • Late 1800’s• Car built on blocks in the barn as workers walked

around the car.• Built by craftsmen with pride• Components hand-crafted, hand-fitted• Excellent quality• Very expensive• Few produced

Page 6: 10/08/2014

Mass Manufacturing

• Assembly line - Henry Ford 1920s• Low skilled labor, simplistic jobs,

no pride in work• Interchangeable parts• Lower quality• Affordably priced for the average family• Billions produced - identical

Page 7: 10/08/2014

Lean Manufacturing • Cells or flexible assembly lines• Broader jobs, highly skilled

workers, proud of product• Interchangeable parts,

even more variety• Excellent quality mandatory• Costs being decreased through process improvements.• Global markets and competition.

Page 8: 10/08/2014

Exercise

Individually, respond to the following question (3-5 minutes)

What are the most prevalent forms of waste in a job that you’ve had or in a process (or activity) that you are very familiar with?

For the assignment that you are doing, would you expect all process plans to be the same? How different?

Page 9: 10/08/2014

Definition of “Lean”

• Half the hours of human effort in the factory• Half the defects in the finished product• One-third the hours of engineering effort• Half the factory space for the same output• A tenth or less of in-process inventories

Source: The Machine that Changed the World Womack, Jones, Roos 1990

Page 10: 10/08/2014

Presentation

• Asian culture has had a significant impact on the rest of the world.– Many words used in our daily languages.

• Martial arts, religion or food.

• Within the business environment.– Improvement tools (kaizen tools)– Production philosophies such as Just-in-time.

• Just-in-time philosophy is also known as Lean Manufacturing.

Page 11: 10/08/2014

Presentation

• Another important philosophy is the concept developed by a Japanese consultant named Kobayashi.– Based on a methodology of 20 keys leading business

on a course of continuous improvement (kaizen).

• Finally, the production core elements will be presented in order to focus on improvement actions.– In addition, a resource rate to measure improvement

results is also explained.

Page 12: 10/08/2014

Introduction

• Continuous improvement is a management philosophy based on employees’ suggestions.– It was developed in the United States at the end of

the 19th century.

• Nevertheless, the most important improvements took place when this idea or philosophy arrived in Japan. – Japan was already utilizing tools such as quality

circles.• When they combined these two ideas, kaizen was

born.

Page 13: 10/08/2014

Introduction

• In 1926 Henry Ford wrote

– “To standardize a method is to choose out of the many methods the best one, and use it. Standardization means nothing unless it means standardizing upward.

Today’s standardization, instead of being a barricade against improvement, is the necessary foundation on which tomorrow’s improvement will be based.

If you think of “standardization” as the best that you know today, but which is to be improved tomorrow - you get somewhere. But if you think of standards as confining, then progress stops.”

Page 14: 10/08/2014

Kaizen vs Reengineering

• Creating an useable and meaningful standard is key to the success of any enterprise.

• Businesses usually utilize two different kinds of improvements.– Those that suppose a revolution in the way of working.– Those that suppose smaller benefits with less

investment.

Kaizen

Final situation

Initial situationtime

Reengineering

productivity

Page 15: 10/08/2014

Kaizen vs Reengineering

• The evolution consists of continuous improvements being made in both the product and process.

• A rapid and radical change (kaikaku) process is sometimes used as a precursor to kaizen activities.– Carried out by the utilization of process

reengineering or a major product redesign.– Require large investments and are based on process

automation.• In the U.S., these radical activities are frequently

called “kaizen blitzes”.

Page 16: 10/08/2014

Kaizen vs Reengineering

• If the process is constantly being improved (continuous line), the innovation effort required to make a major change can be reduced (discontinuous line in the left).– Otherwise, the process of reengineering can become

very expensive (discontinuous line in the right).

Kaizen

Final situation

Initial situationtime

Reengineering

productivity

Page 17: 10/08/2014

Improvement philosophies and methodologies

• In order to find the source of a problem, it is important to define and understand the source and core of the problem.

• Problem -> Any deviation with respect to the standard value of a variable (quality and production rate).– It is necessary to know what the variable objective is

(desired standard) and what is the starting situation in order to propose a realistic objective.

Page 18: 10/08/2014

Improvement philosophies and methodologies • Three main factors that production managers fear.

– Poor quality.– Increase of production cost.– Increase in the lead time.

• Production improvements should be based on the improvements of processes as well as operations.– Problems can appear in any of the basic elements

that constitute the production area.

Page 19: 10/08/2014

Improvement philosophies and methodologies

• Some example of problems. – Defects, obsolete work methods, energy waste,

poorly coached workers, low rates of performance in machines and materials.

• By analyzing the production management history, several improvement approaches can be identified.– Just-in-time Methodologies (Lean Manufacturing).– 20 Keys to Workplace Improvement (Kobayashi).

• The keys to the Japanese success are.– Simple improvement methodologies.– Workers respect.– Teamwork.

Page 20: 10/08/2014

Just-in-Time. Introduction

• In accordance with this philosophy principle, nothing is manufactured until it is demanded, fulfilling the customer requirements– “I need it today, not yesterday, not tomorrow.”

• The plant flexibility required to respond to this kind of demand is total, and is never fully obtained.– It is critical that inventory is minimized.

• Product obsolescence can make in-process and finished goods inventory worthless.

Page 21: 10/08/2014

Just-in-Time. Introduction

• In 1949 Toyota was on the brink of bankruptcy.– While in the United States Ford’s car production was

at least 8 times more efficient than Toyota’s.• The president of Toyota, Kiichiro Toyoda, presented

a challenge to the members of his executive team.– “To achieve the same rate of production as the

United States in three years.”• Taiichi Ohno, vice president of Toyota, accepted his

challenge.– Inspired by the way that an American supermarket

works, “invented” the Just-in-time method.• With the aid of Shigeo Shingo and Hiroyuki Hirano.

Page 22: 10/08/2014

Just-in-Time. Introduction

• Ohno and Shingo wrote their goal.

Deliver the right material, in the exact quantity, with perfect quality, in the right place just before it is needed”.

• They developed different methodologies.

Thinkingrevolution

The 5S

Standardoperations

One-Pieceflow

Poka-Yoke Jidoka

TPM

JUST IN TIME

Workforce optim

ization

Visual Control

LevelingProductionKanban

Multi-functionalworkers

SMED

Page 23: 10/08/2014

Just-in-Time. Introduction

• The systematic application of all the methodologies create a new management philosophy.– The real value is the knowledge acquired

during its implementation.

• The philosophy developed in Toyota was not accepted until the end of the sixties.– Japan in 1973 benefited from the

petroleum crisis and started to export fuel efficient cars to the United States.

– Since the 1970s, Japan has been the pioneer of work improvement methodologies.

Thinkingrevolution

The 5S

Standardoperations

One-Pieceflow

Poka-Yoke Jidoka

TPM

JUST IN TIME

Workforce optim

ization

Visual Control

LevelingProductionKanban

Multi-functionalworkers

SMED

Page 24: 10/08/2014

JIT. Thinking Revolution

• The Western world employed the following formula to obtain the price of a product.– Price = Cost + Profit.– In Japan, mainly Toyota, employed the

following expression.• Profit = Price – Cost.

– Today, this formula is used worldwide.

• In order to make sure that Toyota would work like the supermarket it was necessary to identify and eliminate all business and production wastes.

Thinkingrevolution

The 5S

Standardoperations

One-Pieceflow

Poka-Yoke Jidoka

TPM

JUST IN TIME

Workforce optim

ization

Visual Control

LevelingProductionKanban

Multi-functionalworkers

SMED

Page 25: 10/08/2014

JIT. Thinking Revolution

• The real cost is “as big as a seed of a plum tree.”– In some cases, manufacturers, let the

seed (cost) grow as big as a tree.• Managers try to decrease the cost by

cutting some leaves out.– In reality, it is more efficient to eliminate

tasks that do not add value to the product.

• Reducing the tree to a smaller size is equivalent to planting a smaller seed.

• The goal of Toyota’s executives was to find this plum tree seed and work hard to reduce the cost.

Thinkingrevolution

The 5S

Standardoperations

One-Pieceflow

Poka-Yoke Jidoka

TPM

JUST IN TIME

Workforce optim

ization

Visual Control

LevelingProductionKanban

Multi-functionalworkers

SMED

Page 26: 10/08/2014

JIT. Seven types of Waste

• Hiroyuki Hirano defined waste as “everything that is not absolutely essential.”– Few operations are safe from

elimination.• He also defined work as “any task that

adds value to the product”.– In Toyota’s factories outside of Japan,

they required between 5 to 10 times more operations to produce the same car.

• Shigeo Shingo identified 7 main wastes common to factories.

Thinkingrevolution

The 5S

Standardoperations

One-Pieceflow

Poka-Yoke Jidoka

TPM

JUST IN TIME

Workforce optim

ization

Visual Control

LevelingProductionKanban

Multi-functionalworkers

SMED

Page 27: 10/08/2014

JIT. Seven types of Waste

• Overproduction– Producing unnecessary products, when

they are not needed and in a greater quantities than required.

• Inventory.– Material stored as raw material, work-in-

process and final products.• Transportation.

– Material handling between internal sections.

• Defects.– Irregular products that interfere with

productivity stopping the flow of high quality products.

Thinkingrevolution

The 5S

Standardoperations

One-Pieceflow

Poka-Yoke Jidoka

TPM

JUST IN TIME

Workforce optim

ization

Visual Control

LevelingProductionKanban

Multi-functionalworkers

SMED

Page 28: 10/08/2014

JIT. Seven types of Waste

• Processes.– Tasks accepted as necessary.

• Operations.– Not all operations add value to the

product.• Inactivities.

– Correspond to machines idle time or operator’s idle time.

Inventory is considered the type of waste with greater impact

Thinkingrevolution

The 5S

Standardoperations

One-Pieceflow

Poka-Yoke Jidoka

TPM

JUST IN TIME

Workforce optim

ization

Visual Control

LevelingProductionKanban

Multi-functionalworkers

SMED

Page 29: 10/08/2014

JIT. Inventory

• Inventory is a sign of an ill factory because it hides the problems instead of resolving them.– For example, in order to

cope with the problem of poor process quality, the size of production lots is typically increased.

• Products that will probably never be used, get stored.

Page 30: 10/08/2014

JIT. Inventory

• If the problem that produces the low quality is solved inventory could be reduced without affecting service.

• Sometimes it is necessary to force a decrease in inventory in order to identify the production variability that necessitated it. – Then, the work method can

be changed.

Page 31: 10/08/2014

Lean Manufacturing

• Lean Manufacturing is the systematic elimination of waste.– Lean is focused at cutting “fat” from production activities.

• Lean has also been successfully applied to administrative and engineering activities as well.

• Many of the tools used in lean can be traced back to Taylor, Ford and the Gilbreths.– The Japanesse systematized the development and

evolution of improvement tools.• Lean Manufacturing is one way to define Toyota’s

production system.– MUDA is the term chosen when referring to lean. In

Japanese, MUDA means waste.

Page 32: 10/08/2014

Lean Manufacturing

• Lean Manufacturing is supported by three philosophies.– Just-in-time– Kaizen (continuous improvements)– Jidoka.

• Translates as autonomation.• Machinery automatically inspects each item after

producing it, ceasing production and notifying humans if a defect is detected.

• Toyota expands the meaning of Jidoka to include the responsibility of all workers to function similarly.

Page 33: 10/08/2014

Lean Manufacturing

• Traditional approximations improves the lead time by reducing waste in the activities that add value (AV).

• Lean Manufacturing reduces the lead time by eliminating operations that do not add value to the product (MUDA).

95% MUDA 5% VA

Lead Time

98% MUDA 2% VA

Lead Time

95% MUDA

Lead Time

90% MUDA

Lead Time

5% VA

10% VA

Page 34: 10/08/2014

20 Keys to workplace improvement

• Iwao Kobayashi, in 1988, published a book explaining 20 keys to Workplace improvement.– They all must be considered in

order to achieve continuous improvement.

• These 20 keys are arranged in a circle.– Shows the relations between the

keys and their influence on the three main factors.

• Quality, cost and lead time.

2016

121197

14 548

15131019

18176

1

2 3

Page 35: 10/08/2014

20 Keys to workplace improvement

• There are four keys outside the circle. – Keys 1, 2 and 3

must be implemented before the rest.

– Key number 20 is the result of implementing the other 19 keys.

20Leading

Technology

16ProductionScheduling

12Developing

yourSuppliers

11Quaility

AssuranceSystem

9MaintainingEquipment

7Zero Monitor

Manufacturing

14EmpoweringWorkers to

Make improve-ments

5Quick

ChangeoverTechnology

4ReducingInventory

8Coupled

Manufacturing

15Cross

Training

13Eliminating

Waste10

Time ControlAnd

Commitment

19ConservingEnergy andMaterials

18Using

Informationsystems

17EfficiencyControl

6Method

Improvement

1Cleaning andOrganizing

2Rationalizingthe system

3Improvement

TeamActivities

Quality

Cost Lead time

Page 36: 10/08/2014

20 Keys to workplace improvement

• Kobayashi divided each key into five levels and set some criteria to rise from one level to the next.– Kobayashi offers the steps to reach the final level

gradually rather than attempting to directly reach the top.

Page 37: 10/08/2014

20 Keys to workplace improvement

• Kobayashi presents a radar graphic to show the evolution of the factory– The scoring of each key is

represented.

• Kobayashi recommends to improve all the keys equally.– In the radar graphic, the

factory’s scoring will grow concentrically.

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

910

1112

13

14

15

16

17

18

1920

Page 38: 10/08/2014

Overall Equipment Efficiency

• To improve the productivity of production equipment Nakajima summarized the main time losses for equipment based on the value of three activities.

• Available work time -> Calendar time.– Fixed time for planned stops -> Preventive

maintenance, operators break.• The rest of the time is considered load time.

Load time

Calendar time

Planned stops

Page 39: 10/08/2014

Overall Equipment Efficiency

• Six main causes that reduce valid operation time.– Breakdowns.

• The time that the machine is stopped by repairs.– Setup and changeovers.

• Corresponds to the change time between models, or between products of the same model.

– Idling and minor stoppage.• Loss time caused by the processes´ randomness or by the

worker-machine cycle complexity.– Reduced speed.

• Caused by the wear of components.– Defects and reworks.

• Low quality products.– Starting losses.

• Machine produces defects until it reaches the operation steady state.

Page 40: 10/08/2014

Load time

Overall Equipment Efficiency

• These six main losses are grouped.

Useful time

Operating time

BreakdownsSetup and changeover

Idling and minor stoppagesReduced speed

Defects and reworkStarting losses

Page 41: 10/08/2014

Overall Equipment Efficiency

Load time

Useful time

Operating time

100time loadtime setup and breakdowntime loadty AvailabiliA

100time operatingunits processedtime cycle stardardePerformancP

100units processedunits defective units processedualityQQ

QPA(OEE) EffeciencyEquipment Overall

• The previous grouped losses define three basic indicator.– Availability, performance and quality.– Overall Equipment Efficiency (OEE) = A · P · Q

Page 42: 10/08/2014

Overall Equipment Efficiency

• Objectives predicted for each indicator by Nakajima.– More than 90% in the availability.– More than 95% in the rate of

performance.– More than 99% in the rate of quality.

• The main advantage of the implementation of these rates is that they can show how the improvements carried out affect directly the equipment efficiency.

Page 43: 10/08/2014

Overall Equipment Efficiency

Startitg situation0,000

0,200

0,400

0,600

0,800

1,000

1,200

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 2 25 2 31 3 37 4 4 4 4 52

APQOEE

Transitory improvement0,000

0,200

0,400

0,600

0,800

1,000

1,200

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 2 25 2 31 3 37 4 4 4 4 52

APQOEE

Permanent improvement0,000

0,200

0,400

0,600

0,800

1,000

1,200

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 2 25 2 31 3 37 4 4 4 4 52

APQOEE

Permanent improvement butworsening in the OEE rate

0,000

0,200

0,400

0,600

0,800

1,000

1,200

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 2 25 2 31 3 37 4 4 4 4 52

APQOEE

Page 44: 10/08/2014

• Visual Factory• Error Proofing• Quick Change-over• Total Productive Maintenance

Other Tools

Page 45: 10/08/2014

5S Programs

• Seiri (sort, necessary items)• Seiton (set-in-order, efficient placement)• Seison (sweep, cleanliness)• Seiketsu (standardize, cont. improvement)• Shitsuke (sustain, discipline)

Page 46: 10/08/2014

• “Ability to understand the status of a production area in 5 minutes or less by simple observation without use of computers or speaking to anyone.”

• 5-S– 1S Sift and Sort (Organize)– 2S Stabilize (Orderliness)– 3S Shine (Cleanliness)– 4S Standardize (Adherence)– 5S Sustain (Self-discipline)

Visual Factory

Page 47: 10/08/2014
Page 48: 10/08/2014

Questions?