1 Welcome 1 st Jericho Forum Annual Conference 26 th April 2005 Riverbank Hotel, London Hosted by SC Magazine.

1

Welcome

1st Jericho Forum Annual Conference

26th April 2005

Riverbank Hotel, London

Hosted by SC Magazine

2

Welcome

Richard Watts Publishing Director,SC Magazine

3

Agenda

11:35: Welcome 11.45: The Challenge YOU are facing 12.05: What is Jericho? 12.25: What has it achieved in the past year? 12.45: What are we doing going forwards 13.00: Lunch 14.30: Mutually beneficial vendor involvement 14.50: Where could Jericho take us? 15.15: Break (Coffee & Teas) 15.45: Panel Debate & Audience Questions

moderated by Ron Condon 16:45 Summing up the day 17:00 Close

4

Welcome

Ron Condon Editor in Chief,SC Magazine

5

The Challenge YOU are facing

John MeakinStandard Charter Bank

& Jericho Forum Board

6

Tearing Down the Walls:The Business Case for Jericho

Agenda The Business Problem The Death of the Perimeter The Security Problem The Potential Solution Scenarios The Future

7

The Business Problem

Business trends & needs breaking traditional network perimeter

– Cost effective networking– Collaborative business– Outsourcing– Joint venturing

For Standard Charter Bank:– Challenge of doing business in Africa

• Network bandwidth availability

– Challenge of grasping market opportunity• Eg Afghanistan, Iraq

8

Current Network Security Strategy

“It’s all about the firewalls….” Premise:

– SCB internal network is “open” at network layer– All restriction of access and protection of data occurs at higher

layers (host, application, etc) Control remote connectivity for:

– off-network hosts/people via “trusted”/“untrusted” networks– “trusted” third-parties via “trusted” third-party networks– “trusted” third-parties via “untrusted” networks, ie Internet– “untrusted” third-parties via Internet

Maintain same level of trust at each layer in multi-layer boundary model

Ensure that SCB network protected by “defence in depth” Provide range of cost-effective solutions for above scenarios Provide resilient connectivity as option where

business transaction requirements specify

9

PSDC Channel - Tier 1 Boundary

PSDC Channel - Tier 2 Boundary

PSDC Channel - Tier 3 (GWAN) Boundary

WWW Server

Back OfficeSystem

RequesterInternet

ApplicationServer

HTTPS

SOAP/HTTP

InternalApplication

Server

SOAP/HTTP

SQL*net

ISIS

PSDC/PSAC

ApplicationDBMS

Auth DBMS

SQL*net

BPEC - Tier 1 Boundary

Tier 2 (GWAN) Boundary

Back OfficeSystem

Requester

Third PartyNetwork

ApplicationServer

SOAP/HTTP

InternalApplication

Server

SOAP/HTTP

SQL*net

ISIS

BPEC

ApplicationDBMS

Auth DBMS

SQL*net

Authentication

Identification

Auditing

Counter-party Authentication

Identification

Auditing

Interface mediation

EDI

Application Logic

User ID + Auth

Auditing

EDI

Application Logic

Internal Appl'n Brokerage

Tier 2’s Data Storage

Internal Appl'n Brokerage

Tier 1’s Data Storage

1BPN Illustrated

10

Connectivity Scenarios

Cost for HA-BPECIs 22% more

Cost for split-site HA-PSDC

Is 35% more

Costs dependenton Application

design

NOTE: This analysis ignores the combination of multiple solutions into a single firewall complex (typical for PSAC installations with Remote SCB Users/Internet Surfing/Email, etc).

NOTE: Total cost for 1000 Remote

Users

Components

Remote SCB Users (x1000)

Small Remote Office

Exchange Data Feed, ie BPEC

Staff Internet Surfing, ie PSAC

Electronic Bank ing System, ie HA-PSDC

Customer Information Transfer, ie PSAC or SS-PSDC

Network Switches - Tier 1&2 14 15 25 14 25 14Network Switches - Tier 3 2Load Balancing 28 28Traffic Shaping 11 11 11Firewalls - Tier 1&2 - Central 12 12 21 12 21 12Firewalls - Tier 1&2 - Remote 2Firewalls - Tier 3 7 4DNS Servers 5 5Proxy Servers 5 5Intrusion Detection Systems 32 32 32 43 40VPN Head-End 11 11VPN Client + Authenticator 50 0Authentication Servers (RADIUS & Ace) 10 10Remote Client Firewall 10Security S/w (eg URL blocking, Malw are Filtering) 10 10Application Web Servers ? ?Application Data Servers ? ? ?Application-Specific Proxy Servers ? ? ?

Component-only Cost Total 160 92 74 89 126 79Implementation Manpower (inc build, OAT, SAT, etc) 6 3 5 4 8 5

Build Cost Total 165 96 79 93 134 84Hardware Maintenance/yr 19 18 15 16 25 16Software Maintenance/yr 67 17 6 16 10 7Operating Manpower (1 yr) 1 1 0 1 1 0Penetration Testing Manpower (1 yr) 3 16 13 20 18

Operating Cost Total 88 39 37 45 55 40Total Costs ($k) 252.59 134.56 115.69 138.17 189.52 124.43

Firewalls - Tier 3 cost as % Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.6% 2.8%Firewalls cost as % Total 10.3% 21.2% 39.4% 18.9% 28.7% 23.6%

Unit Costs ($k)

11

The Death of the Perimeter

(Banking) Business is conducted over networks– Multitude of connection points– Multitude of traffic types (protocols, content)– Complication!

Traditional perimeter security doesn’t scale:– For filtering of addresses or protocols– For management of multiple gateways

Mobile & wireless technology (largely) ignores the perimeter control

Most large corporates have leaky perimeters Perimeter security does nothing about data flow

and residence

12

Fortress Firewall - Old Technology?

13

Terminology

“De-perimeterisation”vs

“Radical Externalisation”vs

Shrinking Perimeters

14

The Challenge

Business transactions– from any PC– on any network– anywhere– by anyone of a wide range of different personnel

Direct to one/more small corporate “island” core(s)

With fully “externalised” network

15

Scenarios

“Traditional” Internet B2B“Traditional” Trusted Third-PartyCore to Core over InternetBranch Office to Core over InternetRep Office to Core over InternetThird-Party Managed Office to CoreServer to Server over InternetHome PC to Core over InternetMobile Device to Core over InternetKiosk PC to Core over Internet

Sh

rin

kin

g P

erim

eter

Sh

rin

kin

g P

erim

eter

Incr

easi

ng

Man

agem

ent

& I

nte

gra

tio

n R

equ

ired

Incr

easi

ng

Man

agem

ent

& I

nte

gra

tio

n R

equ

ired

16

Branch Office to Core: Site-Site VPN

SCB GWAN

Ethernet Internet

FirewallFirewall

VPN box

VPN box

Printer

OuterFirewall

InnerFirewall

Server Log Server

Computer

17

Managed Office

SCB GWAN

Ethernet Internet

FirewallFirewallSSL VPN

with a“Sygate Security Portal” like

product

Laptop

Laptop

Secure ID

Secure ID

18

Cybercafe/Kiosk/Airport Lounge

SCB GWAN

Ethernet Internet

FirewallFirewallSSL VPN

with a “SygateSecurity Portal”

Like product

Secure ID

Secure ID

Computer

Computer

19

The Security Problem

The remote PC– Is it securely configured?– Is it infected with malware?– What about data stored locally?

The network– What happens to my data passing over it?

The island host– Who do I let in?– How to I exclude others?

The management– How to manage ‘000s of points of control to the same

standard with robustness

20

So What Do We Need to Do?

Vendors claim they have the answer BUT!

– Partial delivery– Proprietary solutions– No integration cross-vendors

We need:– Definition of business scenarios– Standard Technology Requirements Definitions

“Sell side” needs to listen– And integrate– Preferably cross their traditional boundaries!

So what is Jericho?– Over to Paul…..!

21

What is Jericho?

Paul Simmonds ICI Plc.

& Jericho Forum Board

22

Agenda

First, what actually is de-perimeterisation Then, the Jericho Forum

– How the two are related– It’s composition– It’s relationship with the Open Group– It’s charter– It’s remit

23

So what is de-perimeterisation?

It’s fundamentally an acceptance that; Most exploits will easily transit perimeter security

– We let through e-mail– We let through web– We will need to let through VoIP– We let through encrypted traffic (SSL, SMTP-TLS, VPN),

Your border has effectively become a QoS Boundary Protection has little/no benefit at the perimeter, That it’s easier to protect data the closer we get to it, That a hardened perimeter strategy is at odds with current

and/or future business needs, That a hardened perimeter strategy is un-sustainable.

24

So what is it actually?

It’s a concept; It’s how we solve the business needs for our businesses without

a hardened perimeter, Its how businesses leverage new opportunities when there is no

hardened perimeter, It’s a set of solutions within a framework that we can pick and

mix from, It’s defence in depth, It’s business-driven security solutions

It is not a single solution – it’s a way of thinking . . .Thus; There’s a need to challenge conventional thinking There’s the need to change existing mindsets

25

Why the Jericho Forum?

Why now? No one else was discussing the problem Everyone was fixated on perimeter based designs Somebody needed to point out the “Kings new clothes” to the

world Someone needed to start the discussion

What’s in it for us? Ultimately, we need products to implement We need to stimulate a market for solutions to

de-perimeterised problems

26

The Jericho Forum Composition

Initial Composition Initially only consumer (user) organisations

– To define the problem space– To create the vision– Free from perception of taint from vendors– With the promise of vendor involvement once the vision defined

That point is here now, and we have our first vendor members But with safeguards to ensure independence; User members own the Forum, vote on the deliverables and run

the Board of Managers Vendors have no voting rights on deliverables or the direction

and management of the Forum.

27

The Open Group relationship

Why the Open Group?– Experience with loose “groups” of companies

and individuals– Track record of delivery– Regarded as open and impartial– All output is free and Open Source– Existing framework with a good fit– Existing legal framework– Global organisation

28

The Jericho Forum Charter & Remit

What Jericho Is . . . There to start the discussion / change the mindset The arbiters of making de-perimeterised solutions work in the

corporate space There to refine what are Jericho Architectural principals vs. Good

Secure Design Building on the work in the visioning document To define key items aligned with the message that make this

specifically Jericho There to clarify that there is not just one “Jericho solution”What Jericho is not . . . Another standards body A cartel – this is not about buying a single solution There to compete with “good security”.

29

Dating & Secure System Design

When it comes to dating, at best you get to pick two out of the following three;– Clever– Beautiful / Handsome– Great Personality / Character Traits

So, given budget & development timelines, at best you have to pick two out of the following three;– Fast (Speed to market)– Feature Rich– Secure

With acknowledgement to Arian J Evans

30

Jericho Principals vs. Good Secure Design

Fast DeliveryCOTS

Secure Design

Feature Rich Business Driven

Inherently SecureSystems, Protocols

& Data

De-PerimeterisedArchitecture

31

The Jericho Forum Challenge

We believe, that in tomorrow’s worldthe only successful e-transactions &

e-businesses will utilise ade-perimeterised architecture

Thus you only have two choices; Do you sit back and let it happen to you?Or Do you help design the future to ensure it fits

YOUR business needs?

32

What has it achieved in the past year?

Andrew YeomansDresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein

& Chairman of the Jericho Technology & Standards Working Group

33

A year or so ago, a few good men….

Met over a few drinks, and the odd meal,and pondered the meaning of life,

but also why this security stuff they were buying wasn’t solving the problems they were encountering . . .

BP

Royal MailStandard Chartered Bank

ICI

34

ABN AMRO Bank Airbus Barclays Bank BAE SYSTEMS Boeing BBC BP Cabinet Office Cable & Wireless Credit Agricole Credit Suisse First Boston Deloitte Deutsche Bank Dresdner Kleinwort WassersteinEli Lilly Ernst & Young LLPGlaxoSmithKline

HSBC ICIING JPMorgan Chase KPMG LLP (UK) Lockheed MartinLloyds TSB National Australia Bank Group (Europe)PfizerProcter & Gamble QantasReuters Rolls-Royce Royal MailRBS

Royal Dutch/ShellStandard Chartered BankThe Open Group UBS Investment Bank UKCeB (Council for e-Business) Task Force Unilever University of Kent Computing LaboratoryYELL

= Founders

Got rather more (men and women) . . .

35

..with various roles…

Chief Information Security Officers IT Security Directors/Managers Director’s of Global Risk Management Senior Information Security Engineers Enterprise Risk Services Managers Directors of Architecture Global Security Services Managers Forward thinking, highly respected security

strategists

36

Everything runs on:• Same physical wires• Same logical network

General Users

Application

Systems

Admin

Customers Partners Suppliers

• Joint ventures• Outsourcers• Offshore

providers

…worked up about this…

37

CISO / Security

Team

Owners/ InvestorsBoard of

Directors

Executive Management

IT function

External Auditors

Internal Auditors

Customers Community

Governance

Avoid/Contain Enterprise Risks

Avoid/Contain Local/Personal Risks

Ach

ieve C

ontr

ol

and A

uth

ori

tyD

emonstrate A

ccount-ability and C

ompliance

Regulators

Other functions

Lines of Business

…and wider stakeholders and their goals…

38

…or in words…

The traditional model of a hard perimeter and soft centre is changing as :– Your people move outside the perimeter– They are not just ‘your’ people any more– Business partners move inside the perimeter

The policy is out of sync…– too restrictive at the perimeter (default deny)– lacking in the core (default allow)

39

40

Question What does a ‘corporate’ policy

look like for a virtual organization?

AnswerThe assumption of

‘organization’ breaks down: need granularity

…with wider general consequences, e.g.

Trust models – conventional thinking– Architecture-centric governance models lead us to

federated identity management and trusted second/third parties

– Stakeholder-centric governance models lead us to regulatory solutions and ‘industry’ initiatives,e.g. e-marketplaces

– Both approaches may be constrained, if not doomed!

41

1980s

Managed NetworksDirectoriesSingle sign-onPerimeter Security

1990sNetwork firewalls

Streetwise usersVirtual EnterprisesVirtual Security…?

?? 21st Century

Cyberspace road warriors

Secure buildingsPersonnel contractsPermissions/ VettingGuards and gates

…and we also agreed where we’re headed

42

…but – how soon will this hit us?

“People often overestimate what will happen in the next two years and underestimate what will happen in ten.I’m guilty of this myself.”

Attributed to Bill Gates

43

…the answer to which splits into these:

What’s changing Static, long term business

relationships Assumption that threats are

external – perimeters responsible for protecting all assets from all external attacks

Traditional client server environment used by an office based workforce

Operating System and Network based security controls

How soon…? Dynamic, global business

partnerships Threats are everywhere –

perimeters defend a network, but highly mobile devices must defend themselves: defence in depth needed

Growing use of multi-tier applications / services by an increasingly virtual user-base

Protection extended to applications and end user devices

44

…and led us to some initial conclusions…

Impacts of the information age are now well known: Network externalities, disintermediation Power of globalisation Information Risks and their impacts We have lessons from other infrastructure changes

(electricity, railways, etc) Tools such as Technology Road Mapping and Scenario

Planning can be used to explore the impact of key drivers, trends and events

IT products emerging in the next 3 -10 years are likely to be in today’s research labs…so this is about getting the rightproducts in place

45

…plus some observations on root causes…

Many IT ‘standards’ are broken in practice, e.g.: Certificate/CRL (non) processing in SSL Bug-compatible implementations of X.509 certificate

extensions processing in crypto software Representing collaborating/cooperating organisations in

X.500/LDAP; directory interoperability Re-inventing the wheel for security services for XML

(Signatures, Encryption, Key Management…) Repeated technical standards initiatives with little or no

‘user’ / vendor dialogue: Vendors supposedly understand ‘user’ requirements ‘Users’ can’t and/or don’t articulate what they want…

46

…as well as lively debate on what to call it…

De-Perimeterisation Re-Perimeterisation Radical Externalisation Security Without Frontiers Boundary-Less Information FlowTM

47

…with a key qualification on the “de-”

Why would you still have a perimeter?– Block external attacks in network infrastructure– IP spoofing– Block noise and control intranet– Denial of service attacks– Protection from random traffic– Routing and network address management– Legal barrier– Evidence of corporate boundary

Depending on business mission, criticality etc.

48

So, the Vision we agreed was:

Vision To enable business confidence for collaboration

and commerce beyond the constraint of the corporate, government, academic & home office perimeter, through; – Cross-organisational security processes and services– Products that conform to Open security standards– Assurance processes that when used in one organisation

can be trusted by others

Initial visioning whitepaper at:http://www.jerichoforum.org

49

…and the Mission and Milestones:

Mission Act as a catalyst to accelerate the achievement of the Vision,

by;– Defining the problem space– Communicating the collective Vision– Challenging constraints and creating an environment for

innovation– Demonstrating the market– Influencing future products and standards

Timetable A period of 3-5 years for the achievement of its Vision, whilst

accepting that its Mission will be ongoing beyond that.

50

We established Working Groups . . .

MetaArchitecture

TrustModels

Technology& Standards

Requirements& Ontology

Management& Monitoring

PR, Media& Lobbying

Conceptual scope, structure, dependencies and objectives for de-perimeterisation

Future business requirements for identity management and assurance

Intercepts with current/future vendor R&D and product roadmaps

Future business requirements for information management and security requirements management

Future business requirements for operational security management in de-perimeterised environments

Promotion of our programme in public affairs, relevant interest groups and regulatory/ legislative agendas; collaboration with these groups

51

. . . and defined an initial set of scenarios

Providelow-cost connectivity

Access over wireless/public networks Identity theft, phishing etc.

Domain inter-working via open networks Standards complexity and lack of interoperability; IPv6

Supportroaming personnel

Phoning home from a hostile environment On-demand trust validation; environment isolation/security

Enable portability of identities and data Credentials, attribute/ policy based access security

Allowexternalaccess

Application access by suppliers, distribution agents or business partners

Poor integration of strategic applications (ERP/CRM etc) with security standards

Outsourced help desk access to internal systems

Least privilege remote access

Improve flexibility

Connect organisations using secure XML Standards complexity / inadequate trust models

Consolidate/ interconnect identity and access management

Incomplete interoperability standards

Automate policy for controlled info sharing Securing the semantic web

Harmonize identities and trust relationships with individuals

‘Individual-centric’ security

52

…with ever-greater priorities

Provide low-cost connectivity

Access over wireless/public networks 1.9 1.3

Domain inter-working via open networks 3.1 2.0

Support roaming personnel

Phoning home from a hostile environment 2.1 1.6

Enable portability of identities and data 2.8 1.8

Allow external access

Application access by suppliers, distribution agents or business partners

2.0 1.8

Outsourced help desk access to int. systems

2.8 2.5

Improve flexibility Connect organisations using secure XML 2.6 1.9

Consolidate/ interconnect identity & access management

2.9 1.6

Automate policy for controlled info sharing 3.3 2.3

Harmonize identities and trust relationships with individuals

2.6 1.8

Score: 1 = high priority, 3 = medium, 5 = low priority

53

What are we doing going forwards

Adrian SeccombeEli Lilly

& Chairman, Trust Model Working Group

54

Jericho Forum Way Forward

Jericho will provide thought leadership on all aspects of de-perimeterisation

Strategies being deployed;– Formal working groups within Jericho– Foster academic links and research– Continue evangelisation– Promote independent discussion and research– Competitions– Conferences– Expand Membership

55

Jericho Forum Working Groups

Jericho Forum working groups will only exist for the necessary period of time

To date two have been convened and disbanded as their work is complete;– Jericho Forum Management & Transition to Open

Group– Visioning Working Group

Six currently exist

56

Jericho Forum Working Groups . . .

MetaArchitecture

TrustModels

Technology& Standards

Requirements& Ontology

Management& Monitoring

PR, Media& Lobbying

Conceptual scope, structure, dependencies and objectives for de-perimeterisation

Future business requirements for identity management and assurance

Intercepts with current/future vendor R&D and product roadmaps

Future business requirements for information management and security requirements management

Future business requirements for operational security management in de-perimeterised environments

Promotion of our programme in public affairs, relevant interest groups and regulatory/ legislative agendas; collaboration with these groups

57

What are Working Groups?

Tried and tested model for cooperative working– Used by Open Group

Products of working groups submitted for voting by Forum members

Method of working:– Few meetings – workshops– Telephone conferences– Email

Two current active working groups:– Trust Models– Technology & Standards

58

Work Group Participation

Membership of Jericho Forum required Four Levels of participation identified:

– Type 1• Physically Engaged << Commitment to attend occasional

TMWG meetings as well phone calls & email and being a Mentally Engaged Contributor

– Type 2• Mentally Engaged << Willingness to remotely engage in TMWG

meetings as well as contributing outside the meetings

– Type 3• Contributor << Willingness to occasionally contribute

– Type 4• Observer

59

Trust Models Working Group

Vision of Jericho Forum dependant on degree to which information requires to be trusted and protected

Model will identify various entities or assets involved in flow of protected, trusted information

Model will NOT attempt to define standards, or design solutions for these requirements

60

Why Model Trust?

In the past Trust based on Human Interaction and Written Legal Contract

Today information flows electronically at speeds that transcend these mechanisms

New model for electronic trust required– accelerate development and ensure

maintenance of trust in new electronic domain

61

Example Trust Model

62

Technology & Standards Work Group

Working out the “nuts & bolts” for Jericho… Requirements Roadmap

– Requirements based on Visioning White Paper– More explicit Business angle (What’s In It For Me)– More specific Threat landscape

Technology Roadmap Short-term, 6-month & Long-term deliverables 2-way communication with other Jericho WGs – particularly

Architecture, Trust Models, Requirements/Ontology Using outcomes from The Jericho Challenge

– representative from TSWG involved to validate definition & evaluate criteria for assessing submissions

63

Foster academic links and research

Jericho is providing assisted membership for suitable academic researchers

To date three links have been approved by the Jericho Forum Management Board– University of Kent Computing Laboratory– Royal Holloway College (in progress)– University of Auckland (in progress)

64

Promote independent discussion & research

Research into de-perimeterisation is not Jericho Forum exclusive territory;

Other publications;– PITAC– Butler Group

65

Cyber Security: A Crisis of Prioritization

Cyber Security: A Crisis of Prioritization(February 2005) http://www.itrd.gov/pitac/reports/20050301_cybersecurity/cybersecurity.pdf

A broad consensus among computer scientists is emerging that the approach of patching and retrofitting networks, computing systems, and software to “add” security and reliability may be necessary in the short run but is inadequate for addressing the Nation’s cyber security needs.

66

Fundamentally New Security Models, Methods Needed– The vast majority of cyber security research conducted to date

has been based on the concept of perimeter defence. – This weakness of the perimeter defence strategy has

become painfully clear. But it is not the only problem with the model. The distinction between “outside” and “inside” breaks down amid the proliferation of wireless and embedded technologies connected to networks and the increasing complexity of networked “systems of systems.”

– Security add-ons will always be necessary to fix some security problems, but ultimately there is no substitute for system-wide end-to-end security that is minimally intrusive.

Cyber Security: A Crisis of Prioritization

67

April 2005 Butler Group Review

“Deperimeterisation has become more than an interesting idea it is now a requirement for many organisations”

“Vendors have shown an increasing willingness to listen to the user community, but in the absence of a coherent voice from the end-users themselves, may have been uncertain about to whom they should be listening.”

“As long as Jericho can continue to build upon its foundations and successfully integrate vendor input into its ongoing strategies, then we see no reason why this community should not become a strong and valuable voice in the years ahead.”

www.butlergroup.com/research

68

The Jericho Challenge

In collaboration with Black Hat, this global competition challenges any team of technology experts to design a secure architectural solution that is open, interoperable, viable, and operates in a de-perimeterised environment - alike to a top global corporation's existence on the Internet.

Deadline for notifying intent to submit entries is May 1st, with full submissions by May30th by arrangement. Selected papers may be presented in July 2005.

More information on the 'challenge', how to enter, prizes, etc. is available in the Jericho Forum website (www.jerichoforum.org).

69

The Jericho Forum USA conference

Thurs May 5th: 10.30 Welcome 10.45 The challenge YOU are

facing - the problem inbusiness terms

11.15 What is Jericho? 11.30 What has Jericho achieved 12.00 Going forwards – roadmap

& deliverables 12.25 How to join 14.00 Mutually beneficial vendor

involvement 14.30 Jericho future 15.30 Panel discussion

Fri May 6th: 09.00 Review of Jericho Forum

working groups – charters, activities

10.00 Breakout groups – parallel workshops

12.00 Plenary review – workshop feedback

12.30 Lunch 14.00 New breakout groups –

parallel workshops 15.30 Summary – feedback &

conclusions; next steps 16.00 Close

Thurs-Fri, May 5-6, 2005 Hosted by Procter & GambleExecutive Conference Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

70

Challenges Ahead

How to keep up momentum?– Market wants to see tangible, usable

deliverables Detailed work rooted in real-world

experience– Balancing active participation with “the day job”

Global working– Making effective use of phone & email

But when it’s all done…..

71

Lunch

Lunch

72

Mutually beneficial vendor involvement

Paul Simmonds ICI Plc.

& Jericho Forum Board

73

Agenda

Why has the Jericho Forum opened up to vendors?

Why become a vendor member? Rights of vendor members vs. user members How to engage

– What Forum membership is not– How to get best value from membership

74

Vendor membership of a user forum?– What’s that about?

Jericho Forum fundamental principle is to be user driven to get break-thorough in:– Solving problems that existing perimeter-based

solutions were not addressing– Interoperability and integration of security

across vendors– Giving vendors a user-community driven

business case

That principle has not changed and the Forum remains user owned and driven

75

Vendor membership of a user forum?– What’s that about?

Users don’t build solutions– Engage with vendors to solve the problems we

are defining We invite vendors to join with us;

– Get to grips with the difficult problems– Propose open standards to base products on– Propose new solutions– Change existing thinking & join the debate

Users will approve the standards.

76

Why become a vendor member?1. Making customers successful

A CISO gets a daily flood of solutions and most are rejected out of hand – why?– Too many solutions use ‘FUD’ – Claim to be the latest miracle cure– They may be bought in ignorance rather

than reasoned analysis– Disappointment is likely - not exactly a

repeatable business model!

– HIPPA! SOX! Phishing! Falling Sky! Of those that solve real problems;

– Too many are not integrated– Too proprietary, with limited architecture– At some point they will be thrown away– Perhaps along with the CISO buying them?

77

Why become a vendor member?2. Position in the Marketplace

There is uncertainty in the market - CNet, March 05: "Security, ultimately, will not be a standalone market," said one

investment banker ….. "It will just be just another layer of the infrastructure stack. It's no longer about just making the security products work together."

Software, services and hardware companies in the security sector will pull in $52.2 billion in sales in 2008, compared with $22.8 billion in 2003, predicts market research firm IDC. That makes those businesses attractive targets for acquirers in the networking, communications and systems management industries, among others.

Major CISO:“There are a few very successful security vendors, the remainder find a small niche and/or sell a few small pilots where expectations are far in excess of reality.”

78

What’s in it for me

Access to the thinking of leading security users in one place

No need to organise numerous strategy workshops with users

Access to Jericho thinking, ahead of it being published

Opportunities to grasp new markets ahead of the competition

Meet and understand where integration with other Jericho vendor members will enhance both offerings

79

What’s in it for me

Better opportunity for a larger take-up of customers at faster rate:– ‘viral’ effects of interoperability, users require it of

one another– faster sales-cycle as customers will already

understand the concepts & benefits of a particular security capability.

Do open standards give-away competitive advantage? – No– Jericho Forum requires open standards in

interoperability. ‘Inside the box’ capability and specific functionality can still be competitive issues.

80

Rights of vendor members vs. user members

User members own the Forum, work in the working groups, vote on the deliverables and run the Board of Managers

Vendors may;– Join in the work groups and contribute to design items

and open standards– Have full access to Jericho materials– Elect their own representative onto the vendor council

that represents vendor interests to the Board of Managers

Vendors have no voting rights on deliverables or the direction and management of the Forum.

81

How to engage

What Forum membership is not– A direct sales opportunity– Access to a mailing list– A chance to brand all products

‘Jericho approved’ Best value from membership

– Get involved in the working groups– Have technical contributors like

your CTO be the one who joins– Support open interoperability– Spread the word

82

Where could Jericho take us?

David LaceyRoyal Mail Plc.

& Jericho Forum Board

83

Thinking beyond Einstein …

“I never think about the future. It comes soon enough””

Einstein

84

Preparing for a different future …

We know only one thing about the future or, rather, the futures:“It will not look like the present”

Jorge Luis Borges

Author

85

The importance of Security increases …

Increasing Threats

from viruses, hackers, fraud,

espionage

Increasing Exposure

greater dependence on IT, increasing

connectivity

Increasing Expectations

from customers, partners, auditors,

regulators

86

As organisations continue to change …

Weak Internalrelationships

Strong

External relationships

‘Soft’ ‘Hard’

“Machine”

“Organism”

Trend

87

And existing solutions break down …

Intranet

ASP

JV

Service provider

ExtranetPartner

JV

Outsource

Intranet

ASP

JV

Service provider

ExtranetPartner

JV

OutsourceOutsource

Intranet

ASP

JV

Serviceprovider

ExtranetPartner

JV

OutsourceOutsource

88

As we experience the first security paradigm shift of the 21st Century …

89

Technology will transform our world …

Exploding connectivity and complexity (embedded Internet, IP convergence)

Machine-understandable information(Semantic Web)

De-fragmentation of computers intonetworks of smaller devices

Wireless, wearable computing Ubiquitous digital rights management Biometrics and novel user interfaces From deterministic to probabilistic systems

90

There are consequences for security …

Slow death of network perimeters Continuing blurring of business and personal

lifestyles Security migrates to the data level New languages and tools needed to express,

translate and negotiate security policies Intelligent monitoring systems

needed to maintain control ofcomplex, networked systems

Uncertain security - no guarantees Manage incidents as opportunities

91

How will we respond?

The loss of perimeter security will force us to shrink perimeters to clients, applications and ultimately data

IP Convergence will accelerate this process by challenging existing network security architectures

We will realise that securing our own backyard is no longer sufficient, and work together to develop federated solutions to secure data across boundaries

The Jericho Trust models willunderpin this migration

92

Further developments …

We will agree common policy languages to support cross-organisational processes, including federated identity and access management

This work will underpin the automation of security countermeasures and enable the exploitation of the Semantic Web

We will use the Semantic Web to interpret and secure data in context across organisations

Jericho Technology and Standards willdeliver the underpinning architecture

Jericho Requirements and Ontologymodels will enable its exploitation

93

We will increasingly design our own future …

“The best way to predict the future is to invent it”

Alan Kay

94

Using the power of our imagination …

“Imagination is more important than knowledge.”

Einstein

95

As we look ahead to the second paradigm shift of the 21st Century …

96

A world of increasing openness and complexity …

Exploding surveillance opportunities Limited opportunities for privacy-enhancing

technologies Proliferating data wakes and pervasive

circumstantial data about personal behaviour Intelligent monitoring software can highlight

unusual behaviour Data fusion, mining and visualisation software

can extract intelligence out of noise Exploitable for business, security,

fraud or espionage

97

Visibility & understanding will be key

Understanding and interpreting data in context

Exploit data mining, fusing and neural networks to crunch through complexity

Employ computational immunology to differentiate good transactions from bad

Data visualisation technology to enhance human understanding

98

Break

Coffee &Tea Served

99

Panel Debate & Audience Questions

Panel David Lacey John Meakin Paul Simmonds Shane Tully Andrew Yeomans

Moderator: Ron Condon

100

Wrap-up

Ron Condon Editor in Chief,SC Magazine

101

The Jericho Forum USA conference

Thurs May 5th: 10.30 Welcome 10.45 The challenge YOU are

facing - the problem inbusiness terms

11.15 What is Jericho? 11.30 What has Jericho achieved 12.00 Going forwards – roadmap

& deliverables 12.25 How to join 14.00 Mutually beneficial vendor

involvement 14.30 Jericho future 15.30 Panel discussion

Fri May 6th: 09.00 Review of Jericho Forum

working groups – charters, activities

10.00 Breakout groups – parallel workshops

12.00 Plenary review – workshop feedback

12.30 Lunch 14.00 New breakout groups –

parallel workshops 15.30 Summary – feedback &

conclusions; next steps 16.00 Close

Thurs-Fri, May 5-6, 2005 Hosted by Procter & GambleExecutive Conference Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

102

Jericho Forum Shaping security for tomorrow’s world

www.jerichoforum.org