1 UNCLASSIFIED Joint Capability Areas 24 August 2005.

1

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Capability Areas

24 August 2005

2

6

I

Aldridge Study Capabilities-Based Planning Concept from OSD(P)

Strategic Planning Guidance

OA-05 StudyJoint Force

Capabilities Assessment (JFCA) Study

21 Joint Capability Areas

Informed

Informed

Directed

Developed

SupportSPG Guidance: “Identify, organize, and prioritize the capabilities required for the Defense Strategy”

Sub-Study

•Aldridge Study recommended them...

•OSD(Policy) asked for them…

•OA-05 / JFCA Study delivered them...

•SecDef signed them... NOW WHAT?

How we got here

QDR 2001

CPB Idea

SECDEF Memo

• Aldridge Study recommended them...

• OSD(Policy) asked for them…

• OA-05 / JFCA Study delivered them...

• SecDef signed them... NOW WHAT?

•Planner CRC 26-28 Apr 05•GO/FO Staffing 13 May 05•GO/FO CRC 24-25 Aug

3

Joint Capability Areas Tier 1 / 2

• Joint Force Generation – Man, Equip, Organize,

Develop Skills

• Joint Force Management – Global Posture,

Global Force Management, Planning, Future Capability Identification

• Joint Battlespace Awareness – Planning and

Direction, Observation and Collection, Processing

and Exploitation, Analysis and Production, Dissemination and Integration, Evaluation and Feedback

• Joint C2 – Exercise Command Leadership, Develop Shared Situational Awareness and Understanding, Communicate Commander’s Intent and Guidance, Plan Collaboratively, Synchronize Execution Across all Domains, Monitor Execution, Assess Effects and Adapt Ops, Leverage Mission Partners

• Joint Net-Centric Operations – Information

Transport, Enterprise Services, Info Assurance,

Knowledge Sharing, Applications

•Joint Public Affairs Operations – Public Affairs

Op Planning, Public Info, Command / Internal Information, Community Relations

•Joint Interagency / IGO/ NGO/ Coordination – US Gov’t Interagency Integration, Intergovernmental Organization Coordination, Nongovernmental Organization Coordination

•Joint Protection – Conventional Weapons Threat,

Terrorist Threat, WMD Threat, Protection from Exploitation, Personnel Recovery

•Joint Logistics – Joint Deployment/Rapid

Distribution, Agile Sustainment, Op Engineering, Force Health Protection, Joint Theater Logistics, Logistics Information Fusion, Multinational Logistics

•Defense Support of Civil Authorities – Mil

Assist of Civil Disturbance, Mil Assist to Civil Authorities, Mil Support to Civilian Law Enforcement, Emergency Preparedness

4

Joint Capability Areas Tier 1 / 2

• Joint Homeland Defense- Air and Space Defense,

Land Defense, Maritime Defense, Critical Infrastructure Protection

• Joint Global Deterrence – Global Strike, Global

Defense, Force Projection, Responsive Infrastructure, Inducements

• Joint Shaping – Military Diplomacy, Presence,

Security Cooperation, Defense Support to Public Diplomacy, Strategic Information and Engagement Coordination

• Joint Stability Operations – Humanitarian

Assistance, Reconstruction, Security

• Joint Information Operations – Electronic

Warfare, Computer Network Operations, Operations Security, Military Deception

• Joint Access & Access Denial – Forcible Entry,

LOC Protection, Contingency Basing, Seabasing, Freedom of Navigation, Blockade

• Joint Special Operations & Irregular

Operations – Special Recon, Direct Action,

Counter-Terrorism, Unconventional Warfare, Foreign Internal Defense, Civil-Military Ops, PSYOP, Joint Irreg Warfare

• Joint Land Operations – Conduct Op

Movement and Maneuver, Provide and Employ Joint Fires, Conduct Decisive Maneuver

• Joint Maritime /Littoral Operations – Surface

Warfare, Undersea Warfare, Maritime Interdiction, Maritime/Littoral Expeditionary ops, Maritime/Littoral Fires

• Joint Air Operations – Offensive Counterair

Ops, Strategic Attack, Air Interdiction, Tactical Air Support, Theater Air and Missile Defense

• Joint Space Operations – Space Control,

Space Force Application

5

A collection of similar capabilities grouped at a high level in order to support decision-making, capability delegation, and analysis. Tier 1 JCAs can be generated through any one of the following four sources:

• Provided to a regional COCOM by a supporting COCOM, Agency, or Service

• Delegated by a CJTF to one of his component commanders for execution as the ‘supported commander’

• Provided through a Regional COCOM to a CJTF for execution by one of the JTF staff principals in order to deliver specific functional capability across all the components of the JTF

• Identified by senior leaders for Tier 1 visibility

Tier 1 JCA Definition

A Construct for Joint Capability Areas – Level 1

1. Capability Areas generated and provided to a regional COCOM by a supporting COCOM, Agency, or Service

2. Capability Areas delegated by a CJTF to one of his component commanders for execution as the ‘supported commander’

3. Capability Areas provided through a Regional COCOM to a CJTF for execution by one of the JTF staff principals in order to deliver specific functional capability across all the components of the JTF

4. Capability Areas identified by senior leaders for Level 1 visibility

Level 1 Joint Capability Areas are collections of similar capabilities grouped at a high level in order to support decision making, capability delegation, and analysis.

Joint Capability Areas can be generated through any one of the following four sources:

15

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

8

Joint Capabilities

SupportedCOCOM

SupportingCOCOMs

JFCOMSTRATCOMTRANSCOMNORTHCOM

SupportingAgencies

CJTF

ACC MCC SOCCLCC

DIACIANSANGANRO

USAF USA/USMC SOCOMUSN/USMC

STATEFBICustomsJusticeEtc.

Legend:

“Supported” Contribution

“Supporting” Contributions

15

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

8

Joint Capabilities

SupportedCOCOM

SupportingCOCOMs


SupportingAgencies

CJTF

ACC MCC SOCCLCC

DIACIANSANGANRO



Legend:



5

I

StrategicGuidance

StrategicGuidance

Planning

$PPBE

Planning

$

CBP

JCAsJCAs

Capabilities for theJoint Warfighter

More Time Stove Piped Methodology 5 Different Languages Capabilities that require

Joint Integration

Less Time CBP Methodology One Common Language “Born Joint” Capabilities


“AS IS” “TO BE”Effective andLess Efficient

Effective andMore Efficient

6

A functional or operational capability with sufficient detail to support CJTF-level operations/missions, or joint force generation/management activities. Tier 2 JCAs scope, bound, clarify, and better define the intended mission set of their Tier 1 JCAs. They prevent duplication between Tier 1 JCAs, and are not Service or platform specific.

Tier 2 JCA Definition

15

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

8

Joint Capabilities

SupportedCOCOM

SupportingCOCOMs


SupportingAgencies

CJTF

ACC MCC SOCCLCC

DIACIANSANGANRO



Legend:



15

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

8

Joint Capabilities

SupportedCOCOM

SupportingCOCOMs


SupportingAgencies

CJTF

ACC MCC SOCCLCC

DIACIANSANGANRO



Legend:



A Construct for Joint Capability Areas - Level 2

• Scope, bound, clarify and better define the intended mission set of the Level 1 capability category

• Prevent duplication between high-level categories

• Are not Service or platform specific

• Strive to link to existing Service capability frameworks

• Are subject to periodic review/refinement

Level 2 Joint Capability Areas capture functional and operational detail that translate to CJTF-level operations/ missions.

LEVEL 2

Level 2 Joint Capability Areas:

5

I

StrategicGuidance

StrategicGuidance

Planning

$PPBE

Planning

$

CBP

JCAsJCAs



Joint Integration





7

“I need to do

this…..”

21 JCAs21 JCAs FCBsFCBs

Capabilities (JCDs)Capabilities (JCDs)

Push

PullCapabilitiesCapabilities CapabilitiesCapabilities

Like oil that lubricates machinery,JCAs provide a common language that ties together fundamental business processes

Capabilities Based Planning

8

StrategicGuidance

StrategicGuidance

Planning

Requirements Acquisition

PPBE

$Acquisition

Requirements

PPBE

Planning

Policy

$

Po

li

cy

CBP

JCAsJCAs

JCA

sJC

AsJC

As

JCA

s

JCAsJCAs JCAs

JCAs



Joint Integration



“AS IS”

“TO BE”Effective and

Less EfficientMore Effective and Efficient

9

JFG/JFM/JCA Relationship

BUILD THE FORCE

JOINT FORCE GENERATION

MANAGE THE FORCE

JOINT FORCE MANAGEMENT

EMPLOY THE FORCE

Other 19 JCAs

Specific Requirements

Needed Capabilities

Trained Forces and Equipment

Tailored Forcesand Equipment

10

The Focus of Effort – Near Term Way Ahead

JCA

“Today”

“Tomorrow”“Oct”

Feedback

Feedback

J-7

“Nov”IPR

11

JCA Vision

Today

•Socialize taxonomy across IPTs and incorporate JCAs into QDR as necessary

•Taxonomy and Lexicon SPIWG

•POM 08-13-AT&L RDMPs, DABs & SPG

•Comment Resolution OPR•Basic Rules•Lexicon•Taxonomy

•GO/FO CRC 24-25 Aug 05 Tank

•Refined Tier 1•Working Tier 2•Start point for OPR Business Rules

•AT&L Finalizing JCA integration across Acquisition activities (31 Aug 05)

Nov 05 May 06 Beyond

Ongoing collaboration and participation by Joint Staff, OSD, Services, COCOMsand FCBs

SECDEF Directed

•Tier 1 JCAs validated

•Tier 2 JCAs refined

•JCA Lexicon approved

•JCA Lexicon Incorporated Into:

•CCJO•JOCs•JFCs•JICs

•JCA Lexicon transitionedto joint doctrine

3

I

StrategicGuidance

StrategicGuidance

Planning

$ Requirements

PPBE

Planning

$

CBP

JCAsJCAs



Joint Integration





5

I

F

“I need to do this…..”

21 21 JCAsJCAs FCBsFCBs

Capabilities (Capabilities (JCDsJCDs))

Push

PullNew CapabilityNew Capability New CapabilityNew Capability

Like oil that lubricates machinery,JCAsprovide a common language that ties together fundamental business processes

Capabilities Based Planning

•Tier 1 JCAs reviewed

•Tier 2 JCAs released

•JCA Lexicon submitted

•JCA Lexicon Incorporated Into:

•CBAs•UJTL•GFM & JFP•Revised SPG•Revised TPG

•JCA Lexicon used forIPL assessments

•JCA Lexicon integratedInto PPBE Databases

•Common Theater Strategic /OPN’LEffects List developed•Incorporated into Adaptive Planning

Ass

um

pti

on

s D

epar

tmen

tal “

pro

cess

ow

ner

s” a

re c

om

mit

ted

to

CB

P -

A c

om

mo

n la

ng

uag

e is

nec

essa

ry t

o in

stit

ute

en

terp

rise

-wid

e C

BP

- S

oo

ner

is b

ette

r th

an la

ter

QD

R L

an

gu

ag

e

Transform the way decisions are approachedand made, thereby transforming howstrategic investment is done enterprise-wide.

12

Capabilities Based Process Linkages

GFM

AP

CBPCBP

What’s Required: Now to 5 years

Defense Readiness &

Reporting

What’s Going: Now & Near

Future

Execution & Force

Projection

JCDE

What’s Required: 5 – 20 years

Execution & Force Projection

CoCom Requirements

Policy StrategyJSPS

PPBES

/CONOPSCoCom

Requirements

(Planning Pillar)

JCIDS

JCAs

DoD Acquisition

Analytic Agenda

Analy

tic

Agenda A

nalytic A

genda

An

aly

tic A

gen

da

Ana

lytic

Agen

da

Analytic Agenda

13

6

• Stage I [March – June]Generate a comprehensive, prioritized list of Critical Effects

for OPLAN / CONPLAN List critical effects by plan phase or lines of operation

Generate a comprehensive, prioritized list of Capabilities to achieve those Critical Effects

List capabilities by plan phase or lines of operation

Identify Programs of Record that are able to resource each capability area

Examples follow …

Stage I of IIIStage I of III

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

PACOM’s “LPTR”

12

• Stage IIReview comprehensive list of Capabilities from Stage I and

identify those capability areas in which resources are: Short

Sufficient

In excess / redundant

All of the above should be listed by plan phase or lines of operation

Identify areas in which you are willing to accept risk

Prioritize all of the above

Where resources are short, identify why that is the case

• Examples follow …

Stage II of IIIStage II of III


15

• Stage IIIFor each capability shortfall, identify and prioritize

Programs

Systems

Concepts

Political permissions, and

Allied Investments

… that are able to mitigate the shortfall

Stage III of IIIStage III of III


18

Apportion ing R esources &Apportion ing R esources &R isk Across the AO R (Illustrative) R isk Across the AO R (Illustrative)

R educe risk here,Acce s s Fr ie nd ly Bas e s

De te rm ine e ne m y in te n tion s

Co llate and Dis s e m inate in te l Data an d Pr oducts

Ide n tify, tr ack , and tar ge t air cr aft , s h ips , and g r ound tar ge ts

Ide n tify, tr ack an d tar ge t s ubm ar ine s

Conduct Str ate g ic and In tr a-the ate r M ob ility

Sus tain ope r ations

De fe nd Agains t M is s ile A ttack

De te ct, de fe nd ag ains t, co n tain , cle an -up CBRNE

De s tro y / ne u traliz e m ob ile m ar itim e s ur face tar ge ts

De s tro y / ne u traliz e air cr aft

De s tro y / ne u traliz e g r ound tar ge ts

De s tro y / ne u traliz e s ubm ar ine s

De te ct and de s tro y / ne u traliz e m ine s

Battlespac e Aw a re ness

Com m and and Control

Focused Logis tics

Forc e Applica tion

Forc e M anagem ent

Forc e Protec tion

Joint Tra ining

Net Ce ntr ic

W O T

A c c e s s Fr ie n d ly Ba s e s

De te r m in e e n e m y in te n t io n s

C o lla t e a n d Dis s e m in a te in te l Da ta a n d P r o d u c ts

Id e n t ify , t r a c k , a n d ta r g e t a ir c r a f t , s h ip s , a n d g r o u n d ta r g e ts

Id e n t ify , t r a c k a n d ta r g e t s u b m a r in e s

C o n d u c t S t r a te g ic a n d In t r a - th e a te r M o b ility

S u s ta in o p e r a t io n s

De fe n d A g a in s t M is s ile A t ta c k

De te c t , d e fe n d a g a in s t , c o n ta in , c le a n -u p C BRNE

De s t r o y / n e u t r a liz e m o b ile m a r it im e s u r fa c e ta r g e ts

De s t r o y / n e u t r a liz e a ir c r a f t

De s t r o y / n e u t r a liz e g r o u n d ta r g e ts

De s t r o y / n e u t r a liz e s u b m a r in e s

De te c t a n d d e s t r o y / n e u t r a liz e m in e s

Ba ttle s pa c e Aw a re ne s s

Com m a nd a nd ControlFoc us e d Logis tic s

Forc e Applic a tionForc e M a na ge m e nt

Forc e P rote c tion

J oint Tra ining

Ne t Ce ntr ic

H L D

U N C LASSIFIEDU N C LASSIFIED

C apability S hortfall

C apability E xcess / R e d unda ncy

C apability S uffic ie ncy

or in th is “sufficient”capability area

by accepting risk in this “excess”capability area

…

A cce s s Fr ie n d ly Bas e s

De te r m in e e n e m y in te n tio n s

C o llate an d Dis s e m in ate in te l Data an d Pr o d u cts

Id e n t ify, t r ack , an d tar g e t air cr aft , s h ip s , an d g r o u n d tar g e ts

De fe n d A g ain s t M is s ile A ttack

Ca n't a chie ve surprise

Artille ry ne utra lized

Le adership dis rupted

W M D threa t m inim ize d

Isola te d from int'l support

XX una ble to ex eute pla ns

Conflic t de te rred

E ffectsId e n t ify , t r ack an d tar g e t s u b m ar in e s

C o n d u ct Str ate g ic an d In tr a-th e ate r M o b ility

Su s tain o p e r at io n s

De fe n d A g ain s t M is s ile A t tack

De te ct , d e fe n d ag ain s t , co n ta in , c le an -u p C BRNE

De s tr o y / n e u tr a liz e m o b ile m ar it im e s u r face tar g e ts

De s tr o y / n e u tr a liz e a ir cr aft

Le a de rs hip is ola te dM obile Re s e rve s de fe a te dDe c is ive ground ops

S LO Cs prote c te d XX X forc e s is ola te d

W M D unde r a llie d c ontro l

T ier 2 C apab.

X

14

Available Capability





“As Is” Supplier Driven

Moving to a Capability Based Framework

Does our current Governance Model allow this Paradigm shift?

Supply imposes itself on Demand

NAVYNAVY

MARINES MARINES

Defense AgenciesDefense Agencies

SOCOMSOCOM

AIR FORCE AIR FORCE

ARMYARMY

Performance Management (linking strategy to outcomes)

Ris

k M

an

ag

em

en

t (e

na

bli

ng

ou

tco

me

s)

Demand tailors Supply

“To Be” Market Driven

Capability Portfolio

Acquisition

Requirements

Planning

Resource Allocation

Performance Management

Integration


ARMYARMY

NAVYNAVY

AIR FORCEAIR FORCE

MARINESMARINES

SOCOMSOCOM

Defense AgenciesDefense Agencies

15 Performance Management (linking strategy to outcomes)

Ris

k M

an

ag

em

en

t (e

na

bli

ng

ou

tco

me

s)

PREDECISIONAL DRAFT

CJCS

President

SECDEF

Congress

Strategic PlanningProcess

Strategic PlanningProcess

Joint Governance

Capability Providers (Execute $)

Joint Battlespace Awareness

Joint Command and Control

Joint Net-Centric Operations

Joint Interagency Coordination Joint Public Affairs Operations

Joint Information Operations

Joint Logistics

(Illustrative Example Using Current JCAs)

Capability Providers & Other MembersFunctional Leadership

Capability Providers (Execute $)

Operations♦ Support♦Force Mgmt♦ Future Challenges

Institutional Investments

Corporate Support

Joint Force Management Joint Force Generation

Enabling Capabilities

USA USN USAF USMC DADW COCOM

Joint ShapingJoint Homeland Defense

Joint Global Deterrence

Joint Stability Operations Defense Support to Civil Authorities Joint Special & Irregular Operations

Joint Access & Access Denial Operations

Joint Maritime/Littoral Operations

Joint Air OperationsJoint Space Operations

Joint Land Operations

Joint ProtectionC

ap

ab

ilit

y P

ort

foli

os

= l

ink

ing

th

e p

lan

to

re

so

urc

es

Ca

pa

bil

ity

Re

qu

ire

me

nts

De

ve

lop

me

nt

Jo

int

Go

ve

rna

nc

e P

roc

es

s

CENTCOMCENTCOM

EUCOMEUCOM

JFCOMJFCOM

NORTHCOMNORTHCOM

PACOMPACOM

SOCOMSOCOM

SOUTHCOMSOUTHCOM

STRATCOMSTRATCOM

TRANSCOMTRANSCOM

OtherOther

Effects Capabilities

Capability Managers (Program $)

Institutional Capabilities

PREDECISIONAL DRAFT

16

May06

May 05

SECDEF Memo

Aug05

Nov05

Jul05

QDRSIPT

Formal Updates

Formal Updates

Foster Departmental Implementation &

Integration

Provide refined taxonomy (with lexicon) for Draft QDR Report Identify ways stakeholders could implement JCAs Foster coordinated implementation of JCAs

JCAs Near-Term Way Ahead

SECDEF Memo Tasking • Incorporate JCAs across acquisition activities including DAB process NLT 31 July ‘05

• Incorporate JCAs into future Defense Planning Scenarios and Strategic Planning guidance -- formal update NLT 30 Sept ‘05

• Refine Tier II layer of capabilities lexicon as required to provide sufficient detail to enhance usefulness -- Formal update on progress (Oct ’05)

• In coordination with USJFCOM, integrate capabilities lexicon into Universal Joint Task List --Formal update on progress (Oct ‘05)

• Use capabilities lexicon in continued evolution of Joint Capability Integration and Development System where appropriate -- Formal update on progress (Oct ’05)

• CDR, USJFCOM in coordination w/CJCS incorporate into GFM and Joint Force Provider initiatives – Formal update on progress (Oct ’05)

• Implement Joint Capability areas into current process to receive and assess Integrated Priority List (IPL) submissions from COCOMs

• OSD (PA&E) shall apply JCAS to the program and budget databases prior to the FY08-18 POM cycle

17

Discussion Issues

• OPR assignments

• Necessary detail for JCA “Business Rules”

• Uneven Tier 2 development

• Reflection of JCA Tier 2 dependencies (white vs blue boxes)

• Joint Special Operations & Joint Irregular Operations (lexicon and tier structure)

• Joint Public Affairs (PSYOP in the tier 2 structure)

• Joint Space Operations

1 UNCLASSIFIED Joint Capability Areas 24 August 2005.

Documents

joint fires

joint theater logistics

joint homeland defense

joint capability areas

joint force generation

operations security

global defense

maritime defense