1 Transition Workshop Initiative Jess Stewart
Dec 25, 2015
2
Transition Workshop Initiative
• Objective: – Improve program execution at key program
points through a transition workshop process
• Proposed outcome today: – Agreement in principle on an OSD/ Service/
Industry partnership to incorporate transition workshops for ACAT I programs in FY 2011
3
Workshop Benefits• Program “jumpstart” on common processes
–Risk, IMP/IMS,EVM planning and metrics
• Increased transparency of activities–Requirements flowdown, supplier setup, & data exchange
• Shared govt./contractor perspectives on program goals, business processes and intended outcomes before the real work begins
• Positive environment of trust, collaboration, teamwork and openness
–Clear communications and common contract goals
• Consistency of program execution
4
Notional Planning Timeline/Events
Vision &Processes
RFP
Conduct Workshop
Set PM Agenda
DAB
Team Tasking
Gov. Workshop Pre-brief
Executive Teams
Workshop Top Level Planning
Team Aligned Workshop Events
Govt. only Govt./Contractor
SS CA
5
Schedule slideEvent Briefer Event Briefer Event Briefer
(Draft)(Draft)
0730-0745Recap
PMs/DAU 0730-0745Recap
PMs/DAU
0745-0830User Viewpoint/Reporting Reqts
Users 0745-1130IPT Working Sessions
IPT Leads
0830-0915IBR Preparation
DAU
Cont./Gov.1130-1200
Working Lunch
0915-0930 Break 1200-1500IPT Status
– Charter Update– Responsibility– Accountability– Problem
Resolution– Risk Register– IBR Planning– IMP/IMS Issues– Comms Plan– Near Term
Deliveries– GFE Review
IPT Leads(Co-Brief)
Facilitator(Moderator)
0930-1130Contract Baseline, Incentives, & Change Mgmt
DAU
Cont./Gov.
1130-1200Working Lunch
1200-1245CDR Preparation
DAU
Contractor
Government
1245-1345Risk & Opportunity Mgmt / IMP/IMS
DAU
Cont./Gov.
1400-1415 Workshop Overview
DAU 1345-1415Comm/Metrics/Reviews
DAU
Cont./Gov.
1415-1430 Introductions
Govt./Cont.Executives
1415-1430 Break1430-1730IPT Working Sessions
(Team Alignment)
IPT Leads 1500-1630PM Review
– Path to IBR/CDR– Action Items– Team Challenges
PMs
Facilitator(Moderator)
1430-1515Program Strengths/ Barriers to Success
DAU
1515-1630PM Values & Vision
PMs 1730-2030Dinner & Social
Typical 2.5 day workshopTypical 2.5 day workshop
5
6
Way Forward• Objective: Incorporate transition workshops for all
ACAT I programs in FY 11
• Sponsor: A&T Director, PSA:– Directive type memo for ACAT I programs
• Establish Roles and Responsibilities– Common processes & templates– Determine best way to facilitate workshops with DAU
and Components
• Determine Resource Requirements
Detailed plan to be presented to AMFG
8
Background
• Pilot Programs for ICPM in 2008/2009– JTRS AMF/C-5/GSE/JLTV/JCREW– Upcoming: SDB II & VIPS(BTA) (Virtual
Interacting Processing System)
• Workshop Objectives– Align Contract Execution Processes– Align Government and Contractor Teams– Tailored for task; e.g., contract award/Nunn
McCurdy breach
• Builds on Industry startup processes
9
Existing ProgramsExisting ProgramsExisting ProgramsExisting Programs
ProgramExecutionProblems
ProgramExecutionProblems
ProgramExecutionProblems
ProgramExecutionProblems
ProgramExecutionProblems
ProgramExecutionProblems
Program Execution/Tracking
Program Execution/Tracking
ProgramExecutionProblems
ProgramExecutionProblems
Program Start-up Assist Formation
ProgramExecutionProblems
ProgramExecutionProblems
Goal: Establish Process and Provide Hands-On Support Goal: Establish Process and Provide Hands-On Support for New Programsfor New Programs
Goal: Establish Process and Provide Hands-On Support Goal: Establish Process and Provide Hands-On Support for New Programsfor New Programs
Program Initiation Process
Program Initiation Process
AssistTeam
AssistTeam
New-StartNew-StartProgramsPrograms
“Elements of Success”
“Elements of Success”
Program Reviews
Root-Cause Identification
Program Reviews
Root-Cause Identification
Program Restructuring
&Re-Baselining
Program Restructuring
&Re-Baselining
Lockheed Template
10
Workshop Feedback“Our evolved agenda, which allowed the User and Resource Sponsor to express their viewpoints, was CRITICAL for contractor awareness and understanding of the warfighter “big picture.”
“We did deliver products: face-to-face meetings to establish “running rules”, the way ahead, program issues, and formulation of joint team charters.”
“The key accomplishment was to have Government and Contractor team lead counterparts sit down with one another in a relaxed forum to discuss broad-based and team-focused challenges.”
“Some people questioned why DAU was involved, thought Contractor/Government could have done it on their own. I disagree, DAU was the forcing function, we would not have done this on our own.”
“Contractors told me that their startup had contributed to their CDR successes” --PEO Soldier
“Every program office should have one” --PM, BAMS
12
12
Bottom-Line Up Front
• PSW was worth the work—forum for joint discussion of relevant and time-sensitive issues– Lessons learned applied: conducted extensive pre-work– Aggressive agenda, but all topics addressed– Key focus on LRIP IBR planning and tracking to plan– DAU and LM Corporate facilitation team kept the team on
track
• 54 Action Items assigned– No show-stoppers, but some substantial topics – Part of normal business flow
• Will be worked by IPTs • Will be statused in RERP team meetings
13
13
Purpose of C 5 RERP PSW
• Lay groundwork for successful LRIP IBR
• Focus on LRIP/Production and associated cultural changes with a fixed price environment
• Engage all stakeholders to:– Reinforce effective communications – Ensure clarity of expectations
– Identify specific actions for a clear way ahead
14
Joint Tactical Radio Airborne, Maritime, Fixed (JTRS AMF) Key Benefits
1. Unlike Contract “Kick-Off” Meeting, Teams had Objective Tasks Assigned Prior that Focused on IBR and Beyond Success– Lesson Learned from Program’s with Successful IBR, but Subsequent Struggles
2. Getting the Team Together Early with Focused Tasks Resulted in – Opening / Re-Opening Lines of Communications– Exposing Blind-Spots Early– Closure Oriented Actions
3. Realigned the Government and LM Team from a Restrictive Pre-Milestone B Dual Competition Environment to a Collaborative IPT Operating Model – Joint Development of IPT Charter to be Applied to all IPTs
4. Established the Need for Future Meetings to Continue Success to CDR and Beyond– Partnership and Collaboration is not a One-Time Event
15
Additional JTRS (AMF) Observations
• Perfect Timing– Strong Team Building and Perspective Exchange– Both Sides Noted Excellent Setting of Tone– No Negative Energy
• Successful Blending of DAU and LM Corporate Wisdom – Leveraged Lessons from Past/Present Programs – Positioned for Continuity for Follow-Up Engagement(s)
• Excellent Information Sharing on New/Updated Customer Organization – Lexicon & Roles/Responsibility Exchange Supports Integration
• Bottom Line - Successful– Lowered Risk to IBR– Key Sync Points Made (e.g. LM PM added to Government CCB)– No Major Issues Identified
• Confidence Builder through Sharing of Existing Processes/Procedures and Plans• Adjustments and Forward Actions will make us Stronger
– Joint Program Processes – Requirements (DOORS), Risk/Opportunity, Metrics
“ “ One Program Team” Better Enabled to Execute IBR & Beyond One Program Team” Better Enabled to Execute IBR & Beyond “ “ One Program Team” Better Enabled to Execute IBR & Beyond One Program Team” Better Enabled to Execute IBR & Beyond
16
Typical Workshop Resources• Team
– Lead/Lead assistant/2-3 Subject Matter Experts (may vary)/Report Writer and Corporate participation
– Expect between 250-300 man hours per workshop (including preparation activities) plus travel for facilitator team
• Typical activities– Pre RFP inbrief– Post RFP management agenda determined– Government Team workshop for process definition– Prebrief workshop– Conduct Transition workshop