1 Toxic Stress and the Science of Child Development: Implications for Early Childhood Professionals The 2013 Annual Early Childhood Conference of the Bennington County Child Care Association & Partners November 2 nd , 2013 Todd Grindal, Abt Associates Julius B. Richmond Dissertation Fellow Harvard Center on the Developing Child
50
Embed
1 Toxic Stress and the Science of Child Development: Implications for Early Childhood Professionals The 2013 Annual Early Childhood Conference of the Bennington.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Toxic Stress and the Science of Child Development: Implications for Early Childhood Professionals
The 2013 Annual Early Childhood Conference of the Bennington County Child Care Association & Partners
November 2nd , 2013
Todd Grindal, Abt Associates
Julius B. Richmond Dissertation Fellow
Harvard Center on the Developing Child
2
Preschool Teacher (2002-2005, 2007)
Elementary School Teacher (2001-2002)
3
Outline of Today’s Activities
• Core concepts of early development
• Research on the impact of early childhood programs
• Discuss how this material is relevant to your work
4
My objectives for this workshop
1. Help each of you develop a deeper understanding of the science of child development its implications for you work with children & families.
2. Lean about issues related to early childhood policy and practice in Vermont
5
What are your objectives for today?
(please share with the person sitting next to you)
Why might it be useful for early childhood professionals to
understand the underlying science of child development?
Positive early experiences yield positive long-term
outcomes
33
Children randomly assigned to leave the institution and be placed and high quality foster care environment Children placed in foster care before age 2 appear to catch up with typical children on measures of cognitive development These children had lower rates of ADHD, disruptive behaviors, and depression when compared to children who stayed in the institution
As a result of this study,•The Romanian government passed a law forbidding the institutionalization of non-handicapped children under age 2.•Over 27,000 foster homes have been created.
Bucharest Early Intervention Project
34
Head Start closes one-third of the gap between median and low income family income on a summary of young adult outcomes:
High school graduation College attendance Idleness (not in high school, no wages) Crime Teen parenthood Health status
Long-term effects of Head Start
Source: Deming, 2009
35
Chicago Child-Parent Center (2004)•Children who did not receive a strong education from PK through 3rd grade were three times more likely to be held back and more likely to be placed in special education than those who had a strong PK-3 foundation.
Preparing to Succeed-Boston (2011)• Attending preschool erased the Latino/white test score gap and significant reduced the African American/White test score gap
Preschools in the Public Schools
Source: Reynolds, et al., 2004
36
The impact of attending high quality early childhood education can be observed nearly four
decades later
37
Source: Heckman, 2006 p.1902
Rates of return to human capital investment
38
Cost/Benefit Analyses Show Positive Returns
Early Childhood Programs Demonstrate Range of Benefits to Society
$2
$6
$8
$4
$10
$3.23
Abecedarian Project
(through age 21)
$5.70
Nurse Family Partnership
(High Risk Group)
Perry Preschool(through age 40)
Total Return per $1 Invested
Sources: Heckman et al. (2009)Karoly et al. (2005)
Break-Even Point
0
$9.20
39
36 months: Adjusted means for child outcome by quality
Source: NICHD ECCRN, 2000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Reynell Verbal Comprehension
Bracken School Readiness
Low Quality
Low/Average Quality
High/Average Quality
High Quality
Exclusive Maternal Care
40
The best of what we do is still not good enough
41
Program Evaluation Research Helps Identify Effectiveness Factors
Not all programs are effective.
Effectiveness factors are key to distinguishing those programs that work from those that do not.
Our goal: to provide clearer guidance than the usual calls for “quality.”
Source: Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University (2007)
42
Effectiveness Factors for Early Care and Education Programs