1 “…to raise new ideas and improve policy debates through quality information and analysis on issues shaping New Hampshire’s future.” New Hampshire Economic Forecast January 7, 2013 Dennis Delay [email protected]Board of Directors Sheila T. Francoeur, Chair David Alukonis Michael Buckley William H. Dunlap Eric Herr Richard Ober James Putnam Stephen J. Reno Stuart V. Smith, Jr. Donna Sytek Brian F. Walsh Martin L. Gross, Chair Emeritus John D. Crosier, Sr., Todd I. Selig Kimon S. Zachos Directors Emeritus
27
Embed
1 “…to raise new ideas and improve policy debates through quality information and analysis on issues shaping New Hampshire’s future.” New Hampshire Economic.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
“…to raise new ideas and improve policy debates through quality information and analysis on issues shaping New Hampshire’s future.”
• Most states saw growth in state tax revenue during 2Q 2012.– US Personal Income taxes up 5%– US Sales taxes up 0.7% (Slowest in 2 Years)– US Total state taxes up 3.2%
• New Hampshire state tax revenue declined by 2% in 2Q 2012.
Source: Rockefeller Institute (www.rockinst.org)
19
3 Themes
• NH Recovery is in Danger of Stalling• State revenues and the downside risk.
• State Expenditures
20
State Revenues, Expenditures, and Gross State ProductGrowth from 1988 Levels
General Fund Revenues(without Medicaid Enhancement)
21
Annualized Growth in Selected Factors Driving State Expenditures
1982 - 2012
State Spending Drivers
1.2%
5.8%
2.9%
6.5%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
Population Title XIX MedicaidCaseloads
Inflation Total Fund Spending
Annu
aliz
ed In
crea
se 1
982
to 2
012
22
Spending Options Grow Narrower
• “Natural” increases complicate efforts to restore cuts to state programs from the last round of budget-writing.
• Requests for new spending are significant (UNH, DHHS).
• A sluggish economy dictates the terms of policy debates.
232323
“…to raise new ideas and improve policy debates through quality information and analysis on issues shaping New Hampshire’s future.”
New Hampshire Center for Public Policy Studies
Want to learn more?
• Online: nhpolicy.org
• Facebook: facebook.com/nhpolicy
• Twitter: @nhpublicpolicy
• Our blog: policyblognh.org
• (603) 226-2500
Board of DirectorsSheila T. Francoeur, Chair
David Alukonis
Michael Buckley
William H. Dunlap
Eric Herr
Richard Ober
James Putnam
Stephen J. Reno
Stuart V. Smith, Jr.
Donna Sytek
Brian F. Walsh
Martin L. Gross, Chair Emeritus
John D. Crosier, Sr.,
Todd I. Selig
Kimon S. Zachos
Directors Emeritus
24
State Revenues Grew Because of New Taxes and Non-Tax Sources
NH General Fund Revenues 1988 to 2011 (Current $)
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
State Fiscal Year
Mil
lio
ns
of
Do
llar
s
Taxes and rates in place in 1988
Medicaid Enhancement New taxes Increased rates
$543
$936m
$1,369m$1,353
25
Two Thirds of NH Revenue Does Not Grow with Economy,
or Is Volatile2010 New Hampshire State Tax Revenue by Type
$765.3
$243.5
$444.7
$679.8
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
Per UnitUnchanged
Per Unit Changed Ad Valorem Stable Ad Valorem Unstable
Mill
ion
s o
f D
olla
rs
26
Does New Hampshire Have a Structural Deficit?
“New Hampshire can be characterized as having a long-term structural deficit in the sense that for a given scope of programs and revenue system, expenditures grow automatically faster than revenues.”
KPMG Peat Marwick
February 13, 1992
27
Structural Deficit: So What?
• Recognize to scale back on state activities OR recognize the necessity to raise tax rates or add new taxes to maintain a constant level of services.
• Results in more detailed review of all state programs every biennium because there is always a looming shortfall.
• Creates regular atmosphere of crisis and stress.• Reduces possibility of surpluses for investment in
desirable one-time projects.• Makes long-term strategic planning more difficult. • Should not be used as a political weapon to bludgeon