Top Banner
1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 [email protected] www.kathyschwalbe.com
40

1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 [email protected].

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

1

The Value of Project Management: From Building

Bridges to Winning Elections

Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMPMay 14, 2009

[email protected] www.kathyschwalbe.com

Page 2: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

2

Presentation Background

• Most of the information in this presentation is based on reviewing the literature for examples for my latest books– IT Project

Management, Sixth Edition (came out in Apr 2009)

– Introduction to Project Management, Second Edition (came out in Jan 2008)

Page 4: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Outline

• What is project management?• What’s so hard about PM?• Measuring the value of PM• Best practices for industries,

organizations, and individuals• Questions/Comments

4

Page 5: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

What Is Project Management?

• Project management is “the application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to project activities to meet the project requirements” (PMI, PMBOK® Guide, 2008, p. 6)

• In addition to meeting project requirements, it’s also important to satisfy key stakeholders and make sure the results of the project benefit the organization

5

Page 6: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Project Management Framework*

6*From Schwalbe’s texts

Page 7: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

• Project management tools and techniques assist project managers and their teams in various aspects of project management

• Some specific ones include– Project charter, scope statement, and WBS

(scope)– Gantt charts, network diagrams, critical path

analysis, critical chain scheduling (time)– Cost estimates and earned value management

(cost)– See next two slides for more

Project Management Tools and Techniques

7

Page 8: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Common PM Tools and Techniques by Knowledge Area*

8*Schwalbe texts

Page 9: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Common PM Tools and Techniques by Knowledge Area

(Cont’d)*

9*Schwalbe texts

*

*

Page 10: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

• Tools already extensively used that have been found to improve project performance include:– Progress reports– Kick-off meetings– Gantt charts– Change requests

• “Super tools” are those tools that have high use and high potential for improving project success, such as:– Software for task scheduling (such as project management

software)– Scope statements– Requirements analyses– Lessons-learned reports

Super Tools*

10*Claude Besner and Brian Hobbs, “The Perceived Value and Potential Contribution of ProjectManagement Practices to Project Success,” PMI Research Conference Proceedings (July 2006).

Page 11: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

What’s So Hard About PM?• Because every project is unique,

project managers and their teams must have a good understanding of what tools and techniques are available before they can make the more difficult decisions of which ones to use on their projects and how to implement them

• Next, a couple of great examples of the value of PM and creative use of PM tools, from building bridges to winning elections!

Page 12: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Building Bridges

• On August 1, 2007, tragedy struck Minneapolis, Minnesota, when a bridge on I-35W collapsed, killing 13 motorists, injuring 150 people, and leaving a mass of concrete and steel in the river and on its banks*

12

Dick Rohland, “I-35W Bridge Completion Brings Closure to Minneapolis,” ConstructionEquipmentGuide.com (October 4, 2008).

Page 13: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Continued• Peter Sanderson, PM for the joint

venture of Flatiron-Manson, led his team in completing the project

• The contractors earned $25 million in incentive fees on top of their $234 million contract for completing the bridge three months ahead of schedule

• MnDOT justified the incentive payment by saying that each day the bridge was closed it cost road users more than $400,000

13

Page 14: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Winning Elections*

• The Obama campaign used 16 different social platforms, including Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace , YouTube, Fickr, Digg, Twitter, etc. to interact with people from various backgrounds

• Sources say 80 percent of all contributions originated from these social networks, and some say 90 percent of all contributions (which totaled over $600 million) were less than $100

14*David Krejci, “Message received,” StarTribune, Minneapolis, MN (November 5, 2008).

Page 15: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Measuring the Value of Project Management

• Several studies have been done on this topic (some results follow)

• Bottom line: Most people agree PM has value, but it is difficult to measure quantitatively, and what works in one organizations may not work in another!

• It does help to review best practices and get ideas from others 15

Page 16: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Recent PMI Research Publications

16

Page 17: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Ways to Measure the Value of PM

• Agreement on general benefits• Improved project

performance/results• ROI of project management• PM maturity levels

“Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.”Warren Buffet

Page 18: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

General Benefits of Project Management• Better control of financial, physical,

and human resources• Improved customer relations• Shorter development times• Lower costs• Higher quality and increased

reliability• Improved productivity• Better internal coordination• Higher worker morale (less

stress)

Page 19: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

2008 Research Study on the Value of PM*• Over 400-page document, free to PMI

members• Most organizations (65 total in study) did

see value in PM, but did not quantify it: measuring ROI “proved extremely elusive” (p. 246)

• Value focused on measuring PM and– satisfaction– alignment– process outcomes– business outcomes

19*Janice Thomas and Mark Mullaly, “Researching the Value of Project Management,” PMI, (2008).

Page 20: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Conclusions of Study

• “We are extremely comfortable stating unequivocally that project management delivers value to organizations” (p. 349)

• PM value “appears to increase in proportion to the maturity of the PM implementation that is encountered... greater levels of intangible value were reported in organizations that have a higher level of maturity” (p. 352)

20

Page 21: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Improved Project Performance• Project success is often based on meeting

project scope, time, and cost goals• The Standish Group’s CHAOS studies are well

known for documenting IT project success rates and cost of failures*

• Note: 2009 study says 32% successful and 24% failed

Measure 1994 Data 2002 Data 2006 Data Successful projects 16% 34% 35% Failed projects 31% 15% 19% Money wasted on failed and challenged projects

$140 billion $55 billion $53 billion

*The Standish Group International, “CHAOS Activity News,” 2(1), (2007).

Page 22: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Why the Improvements?

"The reasons for the increase in successful projects vary. First, the average cost of a project has been more than cut in half. Better tools have been created to monitor and control progress and better skilled project managers with better management processes are being used. The fact that there are processes is significant in itself.”*

*The Standish Group, "CHAOS 2001: A Recipe for Success" (2001)

Page 23: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

“What the Winners Do”*• Recent research findings show that

companies that excel in project delivery capability:– Build an integrated project management

toolbox (use standard/advanced PM tools, lots of templates)

– Grow competent project leaders, emphasizing business and soft skills

– Develop streamlined, consistent project delivery processes

– Install a sound but comprehensive set of project performance metrics

*Dragan Milosevic, Portland State University, “Delivering Projects:What the Winners Do,” PMI Conference Proceedings ( November 2001).

Page 24: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Findings From 5-Year Study on Quantifying the Value of PM*

• Companies with more mature project management practices have better project performance (on time and budget vs. 40% over time and 20% over cost targets)

• Project management maturity is strongly correlated with more predictable project schedule and cost performance (i.e. .08 schedule performance index variation vs. .16)

• Good project management companies have lower direct costs than poor project management companies (6-7% vs. 11-20%)

*William Ibbs and Justin Reginato, Quantifying the Value of Project Management (2002)

Page 25: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Project Management ROI*

• Over 94% of senior project management professionals say that implementing PM added value to their organizations

• Formula to predict increased company ROI based on increased PMM level– Determine cost to improve PMM level,

improvement in cost performance index (CPI), then calculate PM ROI using profit margins and projected annual revenues*William Ibbs, “The $$$ Value of Project Management: Continuing the Search

for PM’s ROI,” PDS ’02 Conference Proceedings, PMI-ISSIG (2002).

Page 26: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

PM ROI Example*

• Company initially has PMM of 2.3, CPI of .71, profit margin of 5% , $10 M projected annual revenues

• Company improves PMM to 3.1, CPI to .94, profit margin to 6.6% at a cost of $400,000

• PM ROI = (6.6%-5.0%)X$10,000,000 = 40%

$400,000

*William Ibbs, “Managing Chaotic Projects: Improving your PM/ROI,” (Feb. 2001).

Page 27: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Project Management Maturity Models• Similar to maturity models for improving

software like the Capability Maturity Model (CMM)

• Several PM firms have their own maturity models, most using levels 1-5– The International Institute for Learning, Inc.

calls the five levels common language, common processes, singular methodology, benchmarking, and continuous improvement

– ESI’s five levels are called ad hoc, consistent, integrated, comprehensive, and optimizing

– PMI’s Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) released their model in 2004

Page 28: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers Study• Surveyed 200 companies from 30

different countries about their project management maturity and found that– Over half of all projects fail– Only 2.5% of corporations consistently meet

their targets for scope, time, and cost goals  for all types of projects

• The survey’s main objective, however, was to investigate whether a higher maturity level would provide higher project performance

PriceWaterhouseCoopers, “Boosting Business Performance through Programme and Project Management,” (June 2004).

28

Page 29: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

More PWC Study Results• A higher maturity level for an organization

enhances overall project performance, not in just one project, but in the overall portfolio of projects

• Most organizations are not satisfied with their current maturity level. The total average for survey participants was 2.5 on a 5.0 scale

• Project failures are often a consequence of organizational aspects over which project managers have little influence

• Organizational structure has a big impact on overall project performance. The higher the alignment between structure and business requirements, the higher the overall project performance

29

Page 30: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

More PWC Study Results - Best Practices• Staff development and professional certification

enhance overall project performance. However, more than 60% of the companies surveyed do not regularly offer a development program to their project managers

• A systematic approach to change management is fundamental for superior project performance

• Staffing projects with a majority of internal resources as opposed to external resources is a better guarantee of success. The highest performance was achieved by using 25% external resources and 75% internal

• The extent to which project management software is used is correlated to maturity levels. The lower the maturity level, the more difficulties the organization will have in implementing software

30

Page 31: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Another Best Practice Example

Comparison of companies that performed best and worst in new product development*

*Robert G. Cooper, “Winning at New Products: Pathways to Profitable Intervention,” PMI Research Conference Proceedings (July 2006).

31

Best Practice Best WorstAlign projects with business strategy 65.5% 46%Align resource breakdown with strategy 65.5% 8%Get customer input in defining new products 69% 15%Have an identifiable project manager 80% 50%

Page 32: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Best Practices of Individual Project Managers

• Andy Crowe, founder and CEO of Velociteach, wrote a book in 2006 called “Alpha Project Managers: What the Top 2% Know That Everyone Else Does Not”

• As the title suggests, an alpha project manager is defined as one who falls in the top two percent of project managers in terms of performance, as rated by their customers, senior managers, and team members

32

Page 33: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Alpha Project Managers Study Background• Crowe surveyed 860 project managers

who had all been clients/students at Velociteach.

• Although this was not a scientific study, the aggregate results provide interesting information that can help define best practices for project managers

• The general format of the survey questions was as follows: – Mark the degree with which you agree with

the following statement: Strongly disagree (0%), Somewhat disagree (20%), Neutral (50%), Somewhat agree (75%), Strongly agree (100%)

33

Page 34: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

How the 18 Alpha PMs Differed Most• They enjoy their work more

• They believe they have more authority

• They believe they can have a personal impact on project success

• They think it is important for the project manager to be a hands-on manager and a domain expert

34

Page 35: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Alpha PMs Spend Almost Twice as Much Time Planning

• In fact, they spend more time in every process group than their counterparts except for execution, as follows:– Initiating: 2% vs. 1%– Planning: 21% vs. 11%– Executing: 69% vs. 82%– Controlling: 5% vs. 4%– Closing: 3% vs. 2%

35

Page 36: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Alpha PMs are More Efficient and Effective Communicators

• When asked to rank responsiveness, the alphas’ stakeholders’ average response was 88% while the non-alpha average was only 49%

• Alpha project managers send fewer e-mails per day and spend less time in meetings than the non-alphas

• They know how to prioritize work and focus on what is most important

36

Page 37: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

37

Don’t Forget This Best Practice: Take Time to Enjoy Life!

Page 38: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Questions/Comments?

[email protected] www.kathyschwalbe.com

Page 39: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Funny Video

• Why ice fishing sucks

39

Page 40: 1 The Value of Project Management: From Building Bridges to Winning Elections Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP May 14, 2009 schwalbe@augsburg.edu.

Pictures

40