1 The Technical Decision for Transportation Management System The Technical Decision for Transportation Management System by KUANG YANG KOU ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR.

11

The Technical Decision for The Technical Decision for Transportation Management Transportation Management

SystemSystem

by

KUANG YANG KOUASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

DEPARTMENT OF TRAFFIC SCIENCE IN CENTRAL POLICE UNIVERSITY

22

BackgroundBackground ：：1.Impact ： economy, air quality, energy use, land

use, and quality of life.

2.Resource ： finance ; fund.

3.Management ： effective way balanced transportation systems that serve the diverse population equally.

33

ObjectivesObjectives ：：1. Develop monitoring systems that provides data on w

hich subsequent analyses, evaluations, and objective decision-making is based.

2. Create performance evaluations that assemble all the benefits, costs, and impacts of alternatives, so that informed judgments can be made concerning the merits of alternative actions.

3. Identify improvement strategies comprising of broad transportation choices available for evaluation.

4. Create a state-of-the-art decision support tools for prioritizing, programming, and implementing projects.

44

FIGURE 1FIGURE 1Institutional StructureInstitutional Structure

Surface Transportation System

55

FIGURE 2FIGURE 2Interagency CoordinationInteragency Coordination

Freeway

Principal

UrbanLocal

66

FIGURE 3FIGURE 3Transportation Transportation

Management ProcessManagement Process

77

FIGURE 4aFIGURE 4aComponents of Monitoring Components of Monitoring

SystemsSystems

Step1 Step2 Step3 Step4

88

FIGURE 4bFIGURE 4bData Collected for Highway Data Collected for Highway

and Transitand TransitType Data Purpose Method

Highway

Volume Widen Lane Project Sensor (in)

Speed Geography Curve Design Sensor (in)

Weight Safety Pavement Design Sensor (in)

Crash Safety Manual

Resource Maintenance （ Labor , Equipment ） Manual

Transit（ Bus, MRT, Commut

er Rail ）

Passenger Mobility ＊ Peak and Off Peak Sensor (non)

Load Quality Service Sensor (non)

Crash Safety Manual

Resource Maintenance （ Labor , Equipment ） Manual

Sensor(non)

Camera, Video

Sensor(in)

Automated Vehicle Identification SysGeographic Position Sys

Manual Human Being

Step3 Step4

99

FIGURE 4aFIGURE 4aComponents of Monitoring Components of Monitoring

SystemsSystems

Step1 Step2 Step3 Step4

1010

FIGURE 5FIGURE 5Performance MeasuresPerformance Measures

1111

FIGURE 6aFIGURE 6aIdentification of StrategiesIdentification of Strategies

Identification of Strategies

Supply Strategies

Operational Improvements

Intelligent Transportation Systems

（ Table1）

Added Capacity

Access Management

Information Systems（ Traffic Condition）

Parking Management（ Policy）

Travel Demand Management

Incident Management

Demand Strategies

1212

FIGURE 6bFIGURE 6bExample of StrategiesExample of Strategies

Operational Improvements

Added Capacity

Widen Road

Build MRT Line

Build More Train

Travel Demand Management

Incentives

Subsidies

Policy

Incident Management

Detection

Response

Removal

Arterial Traffic Management

Freeway Traffic Management

Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements

Freight/Goods Movement Improvement Programs

Transit Improvements.

Supply Type Demand Type

1313

FIGURE 7FIGURE 7Evaluation of StrategiesEvaluation of Strategies

1414

Project

Goal and Performance Measure Scores

Sum of scores

Rank

Mobility Safety and Security Economic Dev. Environmental

No. of Persons

Person-miles traveled

（ Reduced）No. of Crashes

（ Reduced）

No. of Exposures

No. of Jobs

created

Increase in Tax

Revenue

Impacts on lands

Air Pollution(CO, NO)

High-Occupant-Vehicle Lane on Highway 1

8 5 7 8 3 6 7 2 46 3

Widening of Highway 15 North

5 7 6 9 5 5 4 4 45 4

North-South Freight Rail Line

5 6 4 3 4 5 5 3 35 7

Realignment of Route 44 and Safety Improvements

6 5 8 8 3 2 6 5 43 6

Install Advance Traffic Management Systems

4 7 4 6 2 8 7 6 44 5

Purchase 200 CNG Buses for MTA

7 8 6 9 7 4 4 3 48 2

Purchase 100 Rapid Transit Cars for MTA

9 6 5 4 7 7 6 6 50 1

Table 2Table 2An Example of Project An Example of Project

PrioritizationPrioritization

Scoring is based on a scale of 1 through 10; 1 = lowest score and 10 = highest score.

1515

FIGURE 8FIGURE 8Prioritization of ProjectsPrioritization of Projects

1616

FIGURE 9FIGURE 9Programming of ProjectsProgramming of Projects

1717

FIGURE 10FIGURE 10ImplementationImplementation