1 THE COHESION FUND Objectives, Mechanisms, Procedures, Future DG REGIO – Unit B.1 - Coordination
1
THE COHESION FUNDObjectives, Mechanisms,
Procedures, Future
DG REGIO – Unit B.1 - Coordination
2
Objectives
• Motives for the Cohesion FundA dilemma …
– Member States with lagging development must invest to increase capacity for growth -> modern infrastructure is prerequisite.
– However, to join the euro zone public deficit must be kept under control.
solution proposed …– Maastricht Treaty - created a new fund to
channel financial assistance to the least prosperous Member States.
3
Objectives• Beneficiary states– GNI < 90% EU average– 1993-99: €16,750 million (nominal)
– Greece, Spain, Ireland, Portugal– 2000-06: €18,000 million (1999 prices)
– Greece, Spain, Portugal (+ Ireland -> 2003)– and from 1/5/2004: €7,590 million (1999 prices)– Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary,
Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia.
– 2007-13: €63,000 million foreseen– 13 beneficiaries (as above plus Bulgaria and
Romania)
4
Main Features
• Features of the Cohesion Fund - I– MS are beneficiaries not regions => not
strictly speaking a regional policy – "Additionality" test of the SFs not
applied but "conditionality" test => macro-economic objective to keep public deficit into limits (3% of GDP for euro area MS, a specific % for other MS)
5
Main Features
• Features of the Cohesion Fund - 2– Coordination with SF programmes– MS chooses projects to propose in line
with strategic plans– Sectoral targeting (ratio of 50:50)
– Objectives of the environmental acquis – contributing to the TEN-Transport projects
– Project based - with specific Commission appraisal and approval
6
Mechanisms
• Delivery Structures:
Commission (Appraisal, Adoption, Monitoring)
Managing authority (application pre-selection, Monitoring)
Intermediate Body Intermediate Body
Implementing Body
Implementing Body
Implementing Bodies
Paying authority
EIB / Evaluators
7
Mechanisms
• Project selection:– National Plan– CF Reference Framework (EU, National,
regional priorities) – Identification, pre-selection, preparation– Applications– Commission appraisal, decisions.
8
MechanismsProject Lifecycle – Different roles
Objectives/ Strategy
Programming
Identification
Appraisal
Financing
Implementation
Evaluation
Regulation, Commission Guidelines
Member State
MS
MS / EC [+EIB]
EC / MS
MS
MS / EC Monitors
9
Procedures• Application / Appraisal (1)– Application form
– Description (implementing body, project, location)– Feasibility studies– Financing aspects (co-financing, financial table)– Financial analysis (presence of revenue)– Cost-benefit analysis - CBA (value for money)– Indicators (physical, socio-economic)– Compliance: EIA / Natura 2000 / Procurement / State
aids
– Quality Appraisal– Value for money– Contribution to policies in environment and transport– Compatibility and consistency with EU policy and other
funding instruments– respect of sectoral targeting 50:50
10
Procedures
• Application / Appraisal (2)– Grant rate calculation
– respect of “polluter pays” principle– revenue generation – Public Private Partnership
– Internal consultations – DG TREN, ENV, COMP, etc.
– Complex appraisals – EC may involve EIB, or own consultants
11
Procedures• Decision procedure– Reception to adoption – 3 months (Reg. 1164/94)– Internal Commission consultations – Legal verification / adoption / commitment
procedures– Decisions signed on behalf of the Commission
and notified to MS – Decision content:
– description (eligible elements)– start and end date of eligible period– grant, grant rate, financing plan – compliance conditions (publicity, financial control,
procurement, eligibility rules)
12
Procedures
• Monitoring– National responsibility – Monitoring committee – bi-annual– DG REGIO on-site visits– Special evaluations – problem projects– Coherence with payments– Proactive management to avoid delays /
overruns / multiple modifications
13
Procedures
• Payment procedure– National system of financial management notified to
Commission– Advance payment of 20% when procurement contract
signed– Standard payment declaration (Reg. 1386/02)– Reimbursement of expenditure incurred normally within
60 days of receipt – Financial rules: M+12 , M+24 – Balance of 20% normally retained until completion. – Closure requirements (confirm compliance, expected
benefits, revenues)
14
Procedures
• Financial Control (Reg. 1386/2002)– National responsibility in first place– System of financial management
notified to Commission – If national detection of irregularities –
grant can be retained– If detection by EU controllers – net
corrections, i.e. loss of grant.
15
Future 2007-13
• Future of the Cohesion Fund – 1Reg. (EC) 1084/2006 of 11 July 2006
– Major increase in CF resources as proportion of total -> €63,000 million
– Retaining special features of the CF …– the macro-economic conditionality;– the 90% GNI eligibility threshold;– broader sectoral targeting of the assistance;
– … but with a major reform in implementation …
16
Future 2007-13
• Future of the Cohesion Fund - 2– Future CF implementation
– a switch from EU-level project-based support to programme-based support;
– Greater role for national authorities in project approval (major projects to be treated as currently under SF rules);
– ERDF and CF eligibility rules will be set nationally with limited restrictions in the EU Regulation on each Fund;
– Uniform financial management and control systems.
17
References• References– CF 2007-13:
http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/funds/cf/index_en.htm
– CF 2000-06: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/funds/procf/cf_en.htm
– PPP guidelines: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/pppguide.htm
– CBA Guide: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/cost/guide02_en.pdf
– CF Annual reports: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/repor_en.htm