1 Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading & Writing-Grade 7 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status District Reading.

1

Student Achievement Data DisplaysStudent Achievement Data DisplaysMathematics, Reading & Writing-Grade 7 Mathematics, Reading & Writing-Grade 7

Revised: October 30, 2009

Official WASL Results

AYP Status

District Reading & Writing Baseline Results

2

WASL WASL MathematicsMathematics: 2005-2009: 2005-2009

Grade 7Grade 7

G atew ay M id d le

3

Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance

P e rc e n t M e e t in g M a th S ta n d a rd

0

20

40

60

80

100

% M

eeti

ng

Sta

nd

ard

G a tew ay M id d le 59 54 70 61 66

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

4

Grade 7 WASL: Grade 7 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance

P e rc e n t M e e t in g M a th S ta n d a rd S c h o o l, D is tr ic t , & S ta te

0

20

40

60

80

100

% M

eeti

ng

Sta

nd

ard

2004-05 59 54 46

2005-06 54 49 51

2006-07 70 58 55

2007-08 61 53 50

2008-09 66 56 52

G ate w ay M id d le D is tr ic t S ta te

5

Adequate Yearly Progress: Adequate Yearly Progress: Annual Targets for Grade 7 MathAnnual Targets for Grade 7 Math

MATHAdequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Targets

17.3

38.0

58.7

79.3

100.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

Per

cen

t M

eeti

ng

Sta

nd

ard

6

Grade 7 WASL-Mathematics: Grade 7 WASL-Mathematics: Adequate Yearly Progress GoalsAdequate Yearly Progress Goals

7 th G r a d e M a th A Y P

67.2

0 0

64.3

67.3

0

71.7

25

47.6

0

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

1 0 0

All

Am

eric

anIn

dian

Bla

ck

His

pani

c

Whi

te

Lim

ited

Eng

lish

Asi

an

Spe

cial

Edu

catio

n

Low

Inc

ome

Marg in o f E rro r

P erc en t m ee ting s tanda rd (07 -08 th ru 09 -10 G oa l= 58 .7 )

G oa l

7

Grade 7 WASL Mathematics: Grade 7 WASL Mathematics: Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends

P e rc e n t o f S tu d e n ts S c o rin g in E a c h P e rfo rm a n c e L e v e l M a th G ra d e 7

2 2 1 9

3 4

2 42 2

2 5

3 2

2 2

1 21 7

3 73 3

1 72 1

2 83 3

1 51 9

2 4

4 3

0

20

40

60

80

100

L e ve l 1 L e ve l 2 L e ve l 3 L e ve l 4

P e rfo rm a n ce L e ve l

Per

cen

t in

Lev

el

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

M e e ts S ta n d a rdD o e s N o t M e e t S ta n d a rd

8

Grade 7 Content:Grade 7 Content:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

C o n te n t

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 60 .7 53 .2 51

G ate w ay M id d le D is tr ic t S ta te

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P er cen ts

9 .7

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2008 -09Pe

rcen

t Poi

nt D

iffer

ence

Spring 2009

9

Grade 7 Processes:Grade 7 Processes:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

P ro c e s s e s

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 7 1 .3 6 0 .5 5 4 .5

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

D iffe re n c e B e tw e e n S ch o o l a n d S ta te P e rce n ts

16 .8

-5 0 .0

-2 5 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

20 08 -09Pe

rcen

t Poi

nt D

iffer

ence

Spring 2009

10

Grade 7 Number Sense:Grade 7 Number Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

N u m b e r S e n s e

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith

sim

ilar

per

form

ance

S e r ie s1 46 .1 43 .5 50 .9

G ate w ay M id d le D is tr ic t S ta te

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P ercen ts

7 .5

-8 .8

17 .5

-4 .8

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004 -05 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce

2005-2008

11

Grade 7 Measurement:Grade 7 Measurement:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

M e a s u re m e n t

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith

sim

ila

r p

erf

orm

an

ce

S e r ie s 1 6 4 .7 5 8 .4 5 3 .2

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001D iffe re n c e B e tw e e n S ch o o l a n d S ta te P e rce n ts

3 .57 .1

16 .911 .5

-5 0 .0

-2 5 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

20 04 -05 20 05 -06 20 06 -07 20 07 -08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce

2005-2008

12

Grade 7 Geometric Sense:Grade 7 Geometric Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffe re n c e B e tw e e n S c h o o l a n d S ta te P e rc e n ts

3 .5 7 .1 9 .1 1 1 .5

-5 0 .0

-2 5 .0

0 .0

2 5 .0

5 0 .0

2 0 0 4 -0 5 2 0 0 5 -0 6 2 0 0 6 -0 7 2 0 0 7 -0 8

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001G e o m e tr ic S e n se

0

20

40

60

80

10 0

% w

ith

sim

ilar

per

form

ance

S e r ie s1 76 .6 72 .1 65 .1

G a te w a y M id d le D istr ic t S ta te

2005-2008

13

Grade 7 Probability & Statistics:Grade 7 Probability & Statistics:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffe re n ce B e tw e e n S ch o o l a n d S ta te P e rce n ts

-1 .1

3 .87 .6

14 .8

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004 -05 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001P ro b ab ility & S ta tis tics

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith

sim

ilar

per

form

ance

S e r ie s1 7 1 .6 6 1 .9 5 6 .8

G a te w a y M id d le D istr ic t S ta te

2005-2008

14

Grade 7 Algebraic Sense:Grade 7 Algebraic Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffe re n ce B e tw e e n S ch o o l a n d S ta te P e rce n ts

-3 .3

4 .8 4 .9 2 .7

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004 -05 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Alg eb ra ic S en se

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith

sim

ila

r p

erf

orm

an

ce

S e r ie s 1 5 4 .5 4 8 .6 5 1 .8

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

2005-2008

15

Grade 7 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:Grade 7 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffe re n c e B e tw e e n S c h o o l a n d S ta te P e rc e n ts

4 .9 7 .9 1 0 .2 1 3 .0

-5 0 .0

-2 5 .0

0 .0

2 5 .0

5 0 .0

2 0 0 4 -0 5 2 0 0 5 -0 6 2 0 0 6 -0 7 2 0 0 7 -0 8

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001S o lves P r o b lem s & R easo n s L o g ica lly

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith

sim

ila

r p

erf

orm

an

ce

% 6 5 .0 5 5 .5 5 2

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

2005-2008

16

Grade 7 Communicates Understanding:Grade 7 Communicates Understanding:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffe re n ce B e tw e e n S ch o o l a n d S ta te P e rce n ts

5 .4 5 .4

16 .2 14 .3

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004 -05 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001C o m m u n ic a te s U n d e rs ta n d in g

0

20

40

60

80

10 0

% w

ith

sim

ilar

per

form

ance

S e r ie s1 62 .6 54 .5 48 .3

G a te w a y M id d le D istr ic t S ta te

2005-2008

17

Grade 7 Makes Connections:Grade 7 Makes Connections:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffe re n c e B e tw e e n S c h o o l a n d S ta te P e rc e n ts

5 .4 4 .01 1 .1 1 1 .9

-5 0 .0

-2 5 .0

0 .0

2 5 .0

5 0 .0

2 0 0 4 -0 5 2 0 0 5 -0 6 2 0 0 6 -0 7 2 0 0 7 -0 8

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001M ake C o n n ect io n s

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith

sim

ila

r p

erf

orm

an

ce

S e r ie s 1 6 5 .3 5 8 .0 5 3 .4

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

2005-2008

18

WASL WASL ReadingReading: 2005-2009: 2005-2009

Grade 7Grade 7

G atew ay M id d le

19

Grade 7 WASL Grade 7 WASL Reading PerformanceReading Performance

P e rc e n t M e e t in g R e a d in g S ta n d a rd

0

20

40

60

80

100

% M

eeti

ng

Sta

nd

ard

G a tew ay M id d le 81 78 84 80 84

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

20

Grade 7 WASL Grade 7 WASL Reading PerformanceReading Performance

P e rc e n t M e e t in g R e a d in g S ta n d a rd S c h o o l, D is tr ic t , & S ta te

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% M

eeti

ng

Sta

nd

ard

2 0 0 4 -0 5 8 1 7 6 6 0

2 0 0 5 -0 6 7 8 6 9 6 9

2 0 0 6 -0 7 8 4 7 6 6 9

2 0 0 7 -0 8 8 0 7 3 6 3

2 0 0 8 -0 9 8 4 6 9 5 9

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

21

Adequate Yearly Progress: Adequate Yearly Progress: Annual Targets for Grade 7 ReadingAnnual Targets for Grade 7 Reading

READINGAdequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Targets

30.1

47.6

65.1

82.5

100.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

Per

cen

t M

eeti

ng

Sta

nd

ard

22

Grade 7 WASL-Reading: Grade 7 WASL-Reading: Adequate Yearly Progress GoalsAdequate Yearly Progress Goals

7 th G r a d e R e a d in g A Y P

84.5

0 0

92.9

82.7

0

91.3

12.5

61.9

0

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

1 0 0

All

Am

eric

anIn

dian

Bla

ck

His

pani

c

Whi

te

Lim

ited

Eng

lish

Asi

an

Spe

cial

Edu

catio

n

Low

Inc

ome

Marg in o f E rro r

P erc en t m ee ting s tanda rd (07 -08 th ru 09 -10 G oa l= 65 .1 )

G oa l

23

Grade 7 WASL Reading Grade 7 WASL Reading Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends

P e rc e n t o f S tu d e n ts S c o rin g in E a c h P e rfo rm a n c e L e v e l R e a d in g G ra d e 7

5

14

29

51

5

17

30

48

2

14

26

57

4

16

25

55

2

14

27

58

0

20

40

60

80

10 0

L e ve l 1 L e ve l 2 L e ve l 3 L e ve l 4

P e rfo rm a n c e L e v e l

Per

cen

t in

Lev

el

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

M e e ts S ta n d a rdD o e s N o t M e e t S ta n d a rd

24

Grade 7 Comprehension:Grade 7 Comprehension:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

C o m p re h e n s io n

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 82 .0 68 .4 63 .8

G ate w ay M id d le D is tr ic t S ta te

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P ercen ts

18 .2

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2008-09Pe

rcen

t Poi

nt D

iffer

ence

Spring 2009

25

Grade 7 Analysis:Grade 7 Analysis:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

A n a ly s is

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 81 .4 68 .2 55 .5

G ate w ay M id d le D is tr ic t S ta te

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P er cen ts

25 .9

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2008-09

Perc

ent P

oint

Diff

eren

ce

Spring 2009

26

Grade 7 Critical Thinking:Grade 7 Critical Thinking:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

C r it ica l T h in k in g

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith s

imila

r per

form

ance

% 8 2 .6 6 9 .7 6 1 .6

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P er cen ts

21 .0

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2008-09Pe

rcen

t Poi

nt D

iffer

ence

Spring 2009

27

Grade 7 Literary Comprehension:Grade 7 Literary Comprehension:Comparison of School and StateComparison of School and State

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P ercen ts

5 .5 7 .715 .4 13 .3

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001C o m p re h e n s io n o f L ite ra ry T e x t

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith

sim

ilar

per

form

ance

S e r ie s1 73 .7 67 .6 60 .4

G ate w ay M id d le D is tr ic t S ta te

2005-2008

28

Grade 7 Literary Analysis :Grade 7 Literary Analysis :Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P ercen ts

7 .8

16 .2 15 .218 .8

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001A n a ly z e a n d In te rp re t - L ite ra ry T e x t

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith

sim

ilar

per

form

ance

S e r ie s1 72 .8 67 .9 54

G ate w ay M id d le D is tr ic t S ta te

2005-2008

29

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001

Grade 7 Literary Thinking Critically: Grade 7 Literary Thinking Critically: Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P er cen ts

6 .29 .7

17 .3 14 .9

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce

C r it ica l T h in k in g L iter ar y T ext

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith

sim

ila

r p

erf

orm

an

ce

S e r ie s 1 6 3 .8 5 9 .4 4 8 .9

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

2005-2008

30

Grade 7 Informational Comprehension:Grade 7 Informational Comprehension:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P er cen ts

15 .4 13 .9 14 .710 .7

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001C o m p r eh en sio n o f In fo r m at io n al T ext

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith

sim

ila

r p

erf

orm

an

ce

S e r ie s 1 7 7 .2 7 2 .8 6 6 .5

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

2005-2008

31

Grade 7 Informational Analysis:Grade 7 Informational Analysis:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P ercen ts

4 .9 7 .4

20 .8 21 .0

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004 -05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001An alyz e an d In ter p r e t - In fo r m at io n a l T ext

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith

sim

ila

r p

erf

orm

an

ce

S e r ie s 1 6 7 .1 5 7 .9 4 6 .1

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

2005-2008

32

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001

Grade 7 Informational Thinking Critically: Grade 7 Informational Thinking Critically: Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S ta te P er cen ts

5 .611 .6 9 .6

15 .3

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004 -05 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce

C r it ica l T h in kin g In fo r m at io n al T ext

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% w

ith

sim

ila

r p

erf

orm

an

ce

S e r ie s 1 6 8 .9 6 5 .6 5 3 .6

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

2005-2008

33

SRA Reading Baseline – Grade 7SRA Reading Baseline – Grade 7Reading StrandsReading Strands

G a te w a y M id d le S c h o o l - G ra d e 7S e c o n d a ry R e a d in g A s s e s s m e n ts 2 0 0 9 -1 0

B a s e l in e

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

R e a d in g S tra n d s

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Leve l 1

Leve l 2

Leve l 3

Leve l 4

Leve l 1 9 .5% 6.9% 3.2%

Leve l 2 43 .9% 34.9% 21.2%

Leve l 3 23 .8% 22.2% 20.1%

Leve l 4 22 .8% 36.0% 55.6%

B ase lineC om prehension

B ase line A na ly sis

B ase lineC r itic a l Th inking

C O M P R E H E N S IO N A N A LY S IS C R ITIC A L TH IN K IN G

34

SRA Reading Baseline – Grade 7SRA Reading Baseline – Grade 7Informational and Literary Sub-StrandsInformational and Literary Sub-Strands

G a te w a y M id d le S c h o o l - G ra d e 7S e c o n d a ry R e a d in g A s s e s s m e n ts 2 0 0 9 -1 0

B a s e l in e b y In fo rm a tio n a l & L ite ra ry S u b -S tra n d s

0 .0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

In fo rm a t io n a l & L ite ra ry R e a d in g S tra n d s

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

L e ve l 1

L e ve l 2

L e ve l 3

L e ve l 4

Leve l 1 7 .4% 21.2% 10.6% 10.1% 18.0% 13.2%

Leve l 2 0 .0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.4% 20.6% 16.4%

Leve l 3 27 .0% 42.3% 31.2% 25.9% 40.2% 31.7%

Leve l 4 65 .6% 36.5% 58.2% 28.6% 21.2% 38.6%

B ase lineIn fo rm a tiona l

C om prehension

B ase lineIn fo rm a tiona l

A na ly s is

B ase lineIn fo rm a tiona l

C r itic a l Th ink ing

B ase lineL ite ra ry

C om prehension

B ase lineL ite ra ry A na ly s is

B ase lineL ite ra ry C r itic a l

Th ink ing

IN F O R M A TIO N A LC O M P R E H E N S IO N

IN F O R M A TIO N A LA N A LY S IS

IN F O R M A TIO N A LC R ITIC A L TH IN K IN G

LITE R A R YC O M P R E H E N S IO N

L ITE R A R YA N A LY S IS

L ITE R A R YC R ITIC A L TH IN K IN G

35

WASL WASL WritingWriting: 2005-2009: 2005-2009

Grade 7Grade 7

G atew ay M id d le

36

Grade 7 WASL Grade 7 WASL Writing PerformanceWriting Performance

P e rc e n t M e e t in g W ri t in g S ta n d a rd

0

20

40

60

80

100

% M

eeti

ng

Sta

nd

ard

G a tew ay M id d le 79 82 90 85 89

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

37

Grade 7 WASL Grade 7 WASL Writing PerformanceWriting Performance

P e r c e n t M e e tin g W r itin g S ta n d a r d S c h o o l, D is tr ic t, & S ta te

0

2 0

4 0

6 0

8 0

1 0 0

% M

eeti

ng

Sta

nd

ard

2 0 0 4 -0 5 7 9 7 1 5 8

2 0 0 5 -0 6 8 2 6 8 6 1

2 0 0 6 -0 7 9 0 7 6 6 8

2 0 0 7 -0 8 8 5 8 0 7 0

2 0 0 8 -0 9 8 9 7 7 7 0

G a te w a y M id d le D is t r ic t S ta te

38

WASL Writing:WASL Writing:Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends

P er cen t o f S tu d en ts S co r in g in E ach P er fo r m an ce L evelW r it in g G r ad e 7

5

15

46

33

612

4240

1

9

39

51

3

11

30

56

2

9

34

55

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

L evel 1 L evel 2 L evel 3 L evel 4

P er fo r m an ce L eve l

% i

n L

evel

2 0 0 4 -0 5

2 0 0 5 -0 6

2 0 0 6 -0 7

2 0 0 7 -0 8

2 0 0 8 -0 9

M e e ts S ta n d a rdD o e s N o t M e e t S ta n d a rd

39

Grade 7 Content, Organization, and Style:Grade 7 Content, Organization, and Style:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P ercen ts

21 .0 20 .9 23 .8 24 .020 .4

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001C o n te n t/O rg a n iz a tio n /S ty le

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith

sim

ilar

per

form

ance

% 87 .9 80 .0 67 .5

G ate w ay M id d le D is tr ic t S ta te

2005-2009

40

Grade 7 Conventions (CON): Grade 7 Conventions (CON): Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State

D iffer en ce B etw een S ch o o l an d S tate P er cen ts

6 .8 6 .411 .7

7 .212 .0

-50 .0

-25 .0

0 .0

25 .0

50 .0

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

Per

cen

t P

oin

t D

iffe

ren

ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc

en

tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001C o n v e n tio n s

0

20

40

60

80

100

% w

ith

sim

ilar

per

form

ance

% 96 .0 87 .1 84

G ate w ay M id d le D is tr ic t S ta te

2005-2009

41

SWA Writing Baseline – Grade 7SWA Writing Baseline – Grade 7Writing StrandsWriting Strands

G a te w a y M id d le S c h o o l - G ra d e 7S e c o n d a ry W r it in g As s e s s m e n t 2 0 0 9 -1 0

B a s e lin e

0 .0%

10 .0 %

20 .0 %

30 .0 %

40 .0 %

50 .0 %

60 .0 %

70 .0 %

80 .0 %

W ritin g S tran d s

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

L e ve l 1

L e ve l 2

L e ve l 3

L e ve l 4

Le ve l 1 1 .6% 3 .2% 0 .0% 0 .5%

Le ve l 2 40 .7 % 47 .1 % 25 .9 % 37 .0 %

Le ve l 3 54 .5 % 49 .7 % 68 .3 % 62 .4 %

Le ve l 4 3 .2% 0 .0% 5 .8% 0 .0%

B as e lin eC on ten t

B as e lin eO rga n iz a t ion

B as e lin eS ty le

B as e lin eC onven t io ns

C O NT EN T C O NV EN T IO NSS T Y L EO R G A N IZA T IO N