1 1 st M&E Network Forum Crowne Plaza Galleria Manila, Quezon City 07-08 November 2011 M&E in the Philippines: Challenges and Prospects DDG Rolando G. Tungpalan National Economic and Development Authority
Jan 14, 2016
1
1st M&E Network ForumCrowne Plaza Galleria Manila, Quezon City
07-08 November 2011
M&E in the Philippines:Challenges and Prospects
DDG Rolando G. TungpalanNational Economic and Development Authority
2
1. To discuss in-country context of M&E
2. To trace the progress of M&E in the Philippines through major timelines
3. To highlight existing challenges and identify possible future directions
Presentation Outline/Objectives
3
Preliminaries
4
1. The imperative for results- achievement of development objectives- Managing for Development Results (MfDR)
2. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)- Monitoring, Evaluation, M&E- Public Sector Management (PSM)
3. Country-led M&E- Ownership principle- Alignment to country systems
Preliminaries
5
In-country M&E
6
M&E- at the National Level: NEDA, DBM- at the Sector Level: NEDA, DBM, IAs- at the Program/Project Level: NEDA, DBM, IAs
Other Institutions- inter-agency bodies: ICC, NPMC, PIOs, DBCC- Departments: OP-PMS, DILG, DOF- Oversight: COA, Congress
Institutions and Mandates
7
M&E through Major Timelines
8
Pre 1996
1996 - 1999
2000 - 2004
2005 - 2008
2009 onwards
Environment:• Focus on selected major infrastructure projects and ODA-assisted projects• Efficiency orientation
Policies and initiatives:• Public offices created to monitor major infrastructure projects funded by ODA (1960s-70s)• Annual ODA Portfolio Review started in 1992
9
Pre 1996
1996 - 1999
2000 - 2004
2005 - 2008
2009 onwards
Environment:• Results orientation at project level
Policies and initiatives:• Legislative and Cabinet-level issuances requiring report on project results and outcomes• Several TA grants to build project results orientation and capacity
10
Pre 1996
1996 - 1999
2000 - 2004
2005 - 2008
2009 onwards
Environment:• Sectoral orientation (ODA + local funds)
Policies and initiatives:• Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF)• Organizational Performance Indicator Framework (OPIF)• Major Final Outputs (MFOs)• Sector Efficiency and Effectiveness Review (SEER)• Strategic Planning Matrices (SPM)
11
Pre 1996
1996 - 1999
2000 - 2004
2005 - 2008
2009 onwards
Environment:• International agreements on aid and development effectiveness
Policies and initiatives:• Philippine Harmonization Committee and its Action Plan• Joint analytic works and review activities• Use of strengthened country systems
12
Pre 1996
1996 - 1999
2000 - 2004
2005 - 2008
2009 onwards
Environment:• Focus on integrating various results- based management tools and systems• Good governance, transparency, internal controls, accountability
Policies and initiatives:• Integrated results framework: MfDR in the RD Sector•Linking PDP-RM-OPIF
13
Project Level/ Focus on ODA
Sectoral/Total Investment
Input-Output
M&E
ResultsM&E
Project Level Input-Output
M&E
Sectoral Input-Output
M&E
Project Level Results M&E
Integrated Sectoral RME Framework
14
Integrated Results Framework
Narrative OVI MOV
Goal
Purpose
Output
Input
PDP
RM
Statistical/Evaluation reports ,
SER
Sector Outcomes
Agency MFOs
OPIF
SER, BPAR, ODA
Review, SEER
PIP, GAA, CAS 14
15
Challenges and Future Directions
16
1. Institutional coordination- horizontal and vertical integration
2. Use of performance information for decision-making- quality and timing of information- management information systems inter-linkages- feedback to planning, budgeting, implementation
Challenges
17
3. Capacity Development- varying capacities at various levels
4. Conduct of Evaluations- depth (cluster, thematic, impact, etc.)- frequency and coverage- independence
5. Resource Constraints
Challenges
18
1. Continuing work on PDP-RM-OPIF linkage- Sectoral RMs, Cascaded RMs- refinement of indicators
2. Enhanced M&E Frameworks/Plans- institutions, resources, reporting mechanisms
3. Engagement with various stakeholders- CSOs, Congress and Academe- Evaluation Networks, COPs
Moving Forward
19
4. National Evaluation Framework- standards, operating procedures- development of evaluation capacities
5. Involvement in the conduct of evaluation- opportunities for joint evaluation
6. Using knowledge generated through evaluation- for accountability and for learning
Moving Forward
20
1st M&E Network ForumCrowne Plaza Galleria Manila, Quezon City
07-08 November 2011
M&E in the Philippines:Challenges and Prospects
DDG Rolando G. TungpalanNational Economic and Development Authority
Managing for Development Results (MfDR)MfDR is a management strategy focused on development performance and on sustainableImprovements in country outcomes. It provides a coherent framework for developmenteffectiveness in which performance information is used for improved decision making,and it includes practical tools for strategic planning, risk management, progress monitoring,and outcome evaluation.1
MfDR
Focus the dialogue on results
Use resultsinformationfor learning
and decision-making
Align programming,
monitoring andevaluation
with results
Manage for, not by, results
Keep measurementand reporting simple
back
Public Sector ManagementPLAN FOR RESULTS
• President’s Guidepost (16 areas for transformative leadership)
• PDP• RM• PIP BUDGET FOR RESULTS
• MTEF• OPIF
• GAA-NEP• ABM
• ICC Programming- only FAPs consistent with plan are
approved
IMPLEMENT FOR RESULTS
• Agency PAPs• ICC Reevaluation
MONITOR RESULTS• ODA Review• BPAR
• RM/ OPIF Monitoring• OPES
• COA Audit Reports
EVALUATE RESULTS
• SER• MDG Reports ResultsResults
back