1 Small-Scale Suction Gold Dredging Small-Scale Suction Gold Dredging Presented by: Presented by: Joseph C. Greene, Research Biologist Joseph C. Greene, Research Biologist Prepared for a Meeting with Prepared for a Meeting with Oregon State Legislators, Oregon Small-scale Oregon State Legislators, Oregon Small-scale Miners, Miners, and US EPA Region 10 Representatives and US EPA Region 10 Representatives March 9, 2006 March 9, 2006 Oregon House Of Representatives Office Oregon House Of Representatives Office Building, Salem, Oregon Building, Salem, Oregon
46
Embed
1 Small-Scale Suction Gold Dredging Presented by: Joseph C. Greene, Research Biologist Prepared for a Meeting with Oregon State Legislators, Oregon Small-scale.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Joseph C. Greene, Research BiologistJoseph C. Greene, Research Biologist
Prepared for a Meeting withPrepared for a Meeting with
Oregon State Legislators, Oregon Small-scale Miners, Oregon State Legislators, Oregon Small-scale Miners, and US EPA Region 10 Representativesand US EPA Region 10 Representatives
March 9, 2006March 9, 2006
Oregon House Of Representatives Office Building, Oregon House Of Representatives Office Building, Salem, OregonSalem, Oregon
22
Small-Scale Suction Dredging Small-Scale Suction Dredging and the Environmentand the Environment
It is my opinion that the results from scientific It is my opinion that the results from scientific investigations, presented in the Environmental investigations, presented in the Environmental
Impact Reports, prepared by the State of Impact Reports, prepared by the State of California, Clearwater National Forest and California, Clearwater National Forest and Siskiyou National Forest, provide all the Siskiyou National Forest, provide all the
evidence required to support the determination evidence required to support the determination that small-scale suction dredging is that small-scale suction dredging is
de minimisde minimis and impacts from these dredges areand impacts from these dredges are
less than significantless than significant..
33
Many people want outdoor settings to be left in Many people want outdoor settings to be left in a natural condition for quiet enjoymenta natural condition for quiet enjoyment. Thus . Thus
suction dredging is perceived as a conflict with these suction dredging is perceived as a conflict with these activities. The noise of the suction dredge engines and activities. The noise of the suction dredge engines and exhaust fumes and the presence of the suction dredge exhaust fumes and the presence of the suction dredge
activities may be the very things many people go activities may be the very things many people go outdoors to escape. outdoors to escape. However, suction dredgers However, suction dredgers
also enjoy the outdoors.also enjoy the outdoors. (CDFG, page V25) (CDFG, page V25)
The “Real” ProblemThe “Real” Problem
44
The “Real” ProblemThe “Real” ProblemIt should be noted that suction dredging is
considered a legitimate activity on rivers and streams and suction dredge operators have a
Federally mandated right to operate. Dredgers also have the basic right, of all
citizens, to enjoy and utilize streams as long as their activities are in compliance with the
laws and regulations of the State.
ORS 541.110 provides, “the use of water of lakes and running streams of Oregon for the purpose of developing the mineral resources is declared to be a public and beneficial use and a public necessity.”
55
For discussion the following excerpts were taken For discussion the following excerpts were taken from thefrom the
Draft Environmental Impact Report, Adoption of Draft Environmental Impact Report, Adoption of Amended Regulations for Suction Dredge MiningAmended Regulations for Suction Dredge Mining. . 1997. State of California, Dept. of Fish and Game.1997. State of California, Dept. of Fish and Game.
The Conclusions in this report concur with those The Conclusions in this report concur with those found in the Clearwater and Siskiyou National found in the Clearwater and Siskiyou National
Forest Environmental Impact Reports.Forest Environmental Impact Reports.These documents are the culmination of These documents are the culmination of
literature searches for scientific evidence literature searches for scientific evidence regarding the impacts of small-scale suction regarding the impacts of small-scale suction
dredging on the environment and consultations dredging on the environment and consultations with stakeholders and concerned citizens.with stakeholders and concerned citizens.
66
Research to Support the Research to Support the Siskiyou National Forest DEIRSiskiyou National Forest DEIRThe SNF engaged Dr. Peter B. Bayley, Dept. Fisheries
& Wildlife, Oregon State University, to conduct a “Cumulative Effects Analysis” on the effects of
suction dredging forest-wideDr. Bayley concluded:
"The statistical analyses did not indicate that suction dredge mining has no effect on the three responses measured, but rather any effect that
may exist could not be detected at the commonly used Type I error rate of 0.05."
(In other words, if there is an effect, it's so small they can't measure it.)
77
Dr. Bayley continued…Dr. Bayley continued…
"The reader is reminded of the effect of scale. Localized, short-term effects of suction dredge mining have been documented in a qualitative
sense. However, on the scales occupied by fish populations such local disturbances would need
a strong cumulative intensity of many operations to have a measurable effect."
88
Dr. Bayley concluded…Dr. Bayley concluded…
"Given that this analysis could not detect an effect averaged over good and bad miners and that a more powerful study would be very expensive, it would seem that public
money would be better spent on encouraging compliance with current
guidelines than on further study."
Now, back to the comments published in the Now, back to the comments published in the
California Department of Fish and Game “Draft Environmental Impact Report”.California Department of Fish and Game “Draft Environmental Impact Report”.
99
The area or length of river or streambed worked The area or length of river or streambed worked by a single suction dredger as compared to total by a single suction dredger as compared to total river lengthriver length is relatively small compared to the is relatively small compared to the
total available area.total available area.
TheThe average number of hours spent is 5.6 hours average number of hours spent is 5.6 hours per dayper day. . The remaining time is spent working on The remaining time is spent working on equipment and processing dredged materials. equipment and processing dredged materials.
An individual suction dredge operationAn individual suction dredge operation affects a affects a relatively small portion of a stream or riverrelatively small portion of a stream or river. . A A small-scale suction dredge (representing 90-small-scale suction dredge (representing 90-
percent of all suction dredges) may spend a total percent of all suction dredges) may spend a total of 4 to 8 hours per day in the water dredging an of 4 to 8 hours per day in the water dredging an
area from 1 to 10 marea from 1 to 10 m22 (3-33 ft (3-33 ft22).).
1010
Current regulations on most rivers and streams, Current regulations on most rivers and streams, in conjunction with riparian protective measures,in conjunction with riparian protective measures,
results in a less than significant impact to results in a less than significant impact to channel morphologychannel morphology..
In many of the studies performed on suction In many of the studies performed on suction dredging, potentially adverse impacts to river dredging, potentially adverse impacts to river resources were reported.resources were reported. Effects of increased Effects of increased
turbidity levels and sedimentation, decreases in turbidity levels and sedimentation, decreases in invertebrate populations and re-configuration of invertebrate populations and re-configuration of the streambed were temporary and localizedthe streambed were temporary and localized..
Turbidity and sedimentation levelsTurbidity and sedimentation levels generally generally return to background levels within 20 to 80 m return to background levels within 20 to 80 m
(66-263 ft) below the dredging activities(66-263 ft) below the dredging activities. .
1111
Suction dredging can have significant short-term and localized adverse impacts on local benthic
invertebrate abundance and community composition. However, over the long-term, the
impacts appear to be less than significant.
Colonies of invertebrates generally re-colonize areas disturbed by suction dredges within a
relatively short period of time ranging from one to two months. Impacts to benthic invertebrate communities, from suction dredging, appear to
be less than significant.
1212
Effects to benthic and/or invertebrate communities, turbidity and water
quality appear to be less than significant.
They are usually localized and temporary in
duration!
1313
Effects from elevated levels of turbidity and suspended sediment normally associated with suction dredging as
regulated in the past in California appear to be less than significant with regard to impacts to fish and other river
resources because of the level of turbidity created and the short distance downstream of a suction dredge where
turbidity levels return to normal.
Suction dredging appears to have little direct immediate Suction dredging appears to have little direct immediate physical effect on adult fishes in terms of harm from physical effect on adult fishes in terms of harm from actual entrainment by dredges.actual entrainment by dredges.
ADULTS:
Impacts on Fish
1414
Yolk Sac Fry:
Entrainment Entrainment can have a significant adverse effectcan have a significant adverse effect on the on the more delicate stages of fish such as the yolk sac fry. more delicate stages of fish such as the yolk sac fry. During this stage the yolk sac can be easily ruptured or During this stage the yolk sac can be easily ruptured or torn from the fish.torn from the fish.
Juveniles:
Impacts on Fish
Entrained through a suction dredge does not appear to have a significant adverse effect on juvenile fish either.
Eggs:
Developing eggs of salmonids are significantly adversely affected by entrainment through suction dredges. The degree of harm may vary depending on species.
1515
Impacts on Fish
Current law requires that dredging operations must stop or move if redds are present during
a permitted “In Water Work Period”.
Fish eggs and yolk sac fry are protected by seasonal regulations that keep small-scale
suction dredgers out of the rivers and streams during this season.
1616
Dredge piles do not appear to occupy a significant Dredge piles do not appear to occupy a significant portion of the available spawning habitat so that portion of the available spawning habitat so that
dredge pile impacts are expected to be dredge pile impacts are expected to be
less than significantless than significant
Impacts on Spawning Gravel
Most of the effects related to turbidity and sedimentation, and the disturbance of spawning gravels reported were temporary and localized,
and therefore, represented impacts considered less than significant.
1717
Impacts on Spawning Gravel
Once tailing piles are dispersed by high stream flows they do make up a component
of the suitable spawning substrate.
Approximately 60 salmonid redds were observed in a study on Canyon Creek, CA.
None of the redds were found within dredge tailing piles.
1818
Salmonids do not spawn in this type of coarse overburden
1919
TurbidityTurbidity
It has been asserted that salmon were not affected by elevated turbidity but studies have stated that salmonid growth was reduced at 25
NTU but not below.
Turbidity caused by suction dredging is highly variable. Suction dredging bedrock pockets
containing only sand and gravel causes virtually no change in turbidity whereas suction dredging clay deposits causes very noticeable turbidity.
2020
Flood Stage, Klamath River above Portuguese Creek, 2006Flood Stage, Klamath River above Portuguese Creek, 2006
2121
Klamath River water: The left vial was allowed to settled for 24-hours, the right vial was Klamath River water: The left vial was allowed to settled for 24-hours, the right vial was shaken to re-suspend the particulates. The sample was measured at 656 NTU.shaken to re-suspend the particulates. The sample was measured at 656 NTU.
2222
People with agendas
often don’t put facts in perspective
and blur the difference
between facts and speculation
2323
Turbidity plumes, usually, do not cover wide areas of the stream and they are not continuous or consistent in sediment content
2424
TurbidityTurbidityEffects of the levels of turbidity and
suspended sediment normally associated with suction dredging appear
less than significant
with regard to the health or physiology of adult and juvenile salmonids, particularly when one considers that turbidity levels
return to normal levels on an average of 20-80 m (66-263 ft.) below the suction dredge.
Also, natural levels of turbidity may be higher than levels of turbidity caused by suction dredging during certain times of the year.
2525
Notice the switch in plume turbidity density. Now the distant Notice the switch in plume turbidity density. Now the distant dredge plume is lower in suspend material concentrationdredge plume is lower in suspend material concentration
2626
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Siskiyou National Forest, 200 NE Greenfield Road, Grants Pass, OR 97526-0242
Reply to: 2800 Date: October 16, 1995
Subject: A comparison of stream materials moved by mining suction dredge operations to the natural sediment yield rates
To: The Record
…”There are 1,092,302 acres on the Siskiyou National Forest. Using a factor of 0.33 cubic yards per acre per year times 1,092,302 acres will produce a very conservative estimate that 331,000 cubic yards of material move each year from natural causes compared to the 2413 cubic yards that was moved by suction dredge mining operations in 1995 on the Siskiyou. This would be a movement rate by suction dredge mining that equals about 0.7% of natural rates.”
MICHAEL F. COOLEY, Recreation, Lands and Minerals Staff Officer, Siskiyou National Forest
2727
Constructing a nice deep hole for fish habitat while producing an almost imperceptible turbidity plume
2828
Fish FeedingFish FeedingFish have been observed feeding in turbid plumes
created by suction dredging. Stern (1988) observed young steelhead feeding on dislodged
invertebrates in turbid dredge plumes, even though clear water was available nearby.
Cutthroat and rainbow trout have also been observed feeding.
The effects of suction dredging on the feeding of fish appears to be less than significant.
Although invertebrate populations are negatively affected by suction dredging, the impacts are
localized and short-term.
2929
Fish feeding below outfall from a small-scale suction gold dredge Fish feeding below outfall from a small-scale suction gold dredge sluice boxsluice box
3030
Behavior and DistributionBehavior and Distribution
Studies in Canyon Creek, Butte Creek, and the North Fork American River, CA did not indicate
a difference in fish distribution or density below or above suction dredging sites.
Stern (1988) reported that suction dredging did not appear to influence the behavior of adult spring-run salmonids in their summer holding
areas.
3131
Behavior and DistributionBehavior and Distribution
Abandoned dredge holes can provide holding and resting areas for fish. Stern (1988) observed
young steelhead in active and abandoned dredge holes in Canyon Creek.
Suction dredge operators report adult salmon and steelhead moving into dredge holes
overnight. Dredge holes often provide thermal and deeper water habitat for fish and some
dredge holes in the Scott River, CA have held more juvenile salmonids than adjacent habitats.
3232
Benefits to the Benefits to the EnvironmentEnvironment
Small-scale suction dredge miners remove lead shot, fishing sinkers, bullets and other metals
and fragments from streams and rivers.
Removal of these materials by suction dredgers is considered a benefit to the environment.
3333
Intention of CongressIntention of Congress"The development of information which describes "The development of information which describes the relationship of pollutants to water quality is the relationship of pollutants to water quality is essential for carrying out the objective of the essential for carrying out the objective of the Clean Water Act. This information, known as Clean Water Act. This information, known as criteria, is required under Section 304(a) to be criteria, is required under Section 304(a) to be developed and published by the Administrator developed and published by the Administrator and issued to the states and public.and issued to the states and public. Criteria to Criteria to be developed in this section should draw upon be developed in this section should draw upon the bestthe best scientific knowledgescientific knowledge on the subject, on the subject, including information, if any, from the National including information, if any, from the National Academy of Sciences, the U.S Geological Survey Academy of Sciences, the U.S Geological Survey in the Department of Interior, scholarly literature, in the Department of Interior, scholarly literature, academic experts, and other sources.”academic experts, and other sources.”
3434
Establishing Effects of Establishing Effects of PollutantsPollutants
““Criteria establish the effects of pollutants on Criteria establish the effects of pollutants on health or welfare, receiving water ecosystems and health or welfare, receiving water ecosystems and man, man, and identify the natural chemical, physical and identify the natural chemical, physical and biological integrityand biological integrity of the Nation's waters.” of the Nation's waters.”
““The concentration and dispersal of pollutants and The concentration and dispersal of pollutants and their by products through biological, physical and their by products through biological, physical and chemical processes and any related changes in the chemical processes and any related changes in the
diversity, productivity, or stability of receiving diversity, productivity, or stability of receiving water ecosystems water ecosystems would be part of the information would be part of the information
providedprovided”.”.
3535
Natural Integrity of WatersNatural Integrity of Waters
……may be determined:may be determined:
Partially by consultation of Partially by consultation of historical recordshistorical records on species composition;on species composition;
Partially from Partially from ecological studiesecological studies of the area of the area or comparable habitats; and,or comparable habitats; and,
Partially from Partially from modeling studiesmodeling studies which make which make estimations of the balanced natural ecosystem estimations of the balanced natural ecosystem based on available information.based on available information.
3636
USEPA Fact SheetUSEPA Fact SheetJanuary 14, 2000
On Nov. 18, 1996, EPA and the two environmental groups entered into a settlement agreement to
resolve the challenge to the general permit. The proposed permit sets conditions on the discharge
- or release – of pollutants from the operation into waters of the United States.
The settlement agreement required EPA to complete two studies related to the impact of placer mining on the natural environment in Alaska. One was to address the discharge of
metals by placer mining operations and the other was to address the impact of suction dredge
mining.
3737
FINAL REPORT Submitted June 1999FINAL REPORT Submitted June 1999
Prepared For:Prepared For: US Environmental Protection AgencyUS Environmental Protection Agency
Region 10Region 10Seattle, WashingtonSeattle, Washington
Prepared By:Prepared By:
Aaron M. Prussian, Todd V. Royer, and G. Wayne Minshall Aaron M. Prussian, Todd V. Royer, and G. Wayne Minshall Department of Biological SciencesDepartment of Biological Sciences
Idaho State UniversityIdaho State UniversityPocatello, Idaho Pocatello, Idaho
Impact of Suction Dredging on Water Quality, Impact of Suction Dredging on Water Quality, Benthic Habitat, and Biota in the Fortymile River, Benthic Habitat, and Biota in the Fortymile River, Resurrection Creek, and Chatanika River, AlaskaResurrection Creek, and Chatanika River, Alaska
3838
Alaska Study SummaryAlaska Study Summary
The report described the results of research into The report described the results of research into the effects of commercial and small-scale suction the effects of commercial and small-scale suction dredging on the water quality, habitat, and biota dredging on the water quality, habitat, and biota
of Fortymile River, Resurrection Creek and the of Fortymile River, Resurrection Creek and the Chatanika River, Alaska. Chatanika River, Alaska.
Focus of the work on Fortymile River was on an 8-inch suction dredge located on the main
stem and a 10-inch suction dredge located on the South Fork.
3939
Alaska Study SummaryAlaska Study Summary
Water chemistry measured on Fortymile River showed the primary effects of suction dredging were increased turbidity, total filterable solids, and Cu and Zn concentrations downstream of
the dredge.
The results from this sampling revealed a relatively intense, but localized, decline in
water clarity during the time the dredge was operating. These variables returned to
upstream levels within 80-160 m (263-524 ft.) downstream of the dredge.
4040
Alaska Study SummaryAlaska Study SummaryCross-sectional profiles indicate that theCross-sectional profiles indicate that the impact impact of the dredge piles relative to the width of theof the dredge piles relative to the width of the
FortymileFortymile River was small.River was small.
Macroinvertebrate abundance and diversity were greatly reduced in the first 10 m (33 ft.) below the dredge but returned to values seen at the
reference site by 80 to 160 m (263-524 ft.) downstream of the dredge.
One year after dredging on the main stem and South Fork of Fortymile River, recovery of macro-invertebrate diversity appeared to be substantial.
4141
Alaska Study SummaryAlaska Study SummaryThe second component of this project is to The second component of this project is to examine the effects of small-scale suction examine the effects of small-scale suction dredging on smaller streams in Alaska. dredging on smaller streams in Alaska.
Sampling was conducted on Resurrection Creek and on the Chatanika River, Alaska.
The results from Resurrection Creek showed that there was no difference in the macro-
invertebrate communities between the mining area and the locations downstream of the
mining area, in terms of macroinvertebrate density, taxa richness, EPT richness, or food
resources.
4242
Alaska Study SummaryAlaska Study Summary
Results from the Chatanika River showed slight downstream decreases in macroinvertebrate
density, but all other measures remained similar to those of the reference area.
In general, the results are in agreement with other studies that have found only localized
reductions in macroinvertebrate abundance in relation to small-scale suction dredging.
4343
USEPA Fact SheetUSEPA Fact SheetJanuary 14, 2000
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Plans To Issue A Wastewater Discharge Permit To:
Alaska Mechanical Placer Miners
This will also serve as a notice of a
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
4444
USEPA Fact SheetUSEPA Fact SheetJanuary 14, 2000
The environmental groups believed that the suction dredge report (40-mile River, Resurrection
Creek, and Chatanika River) did not address all of the required elements as set out in the 1996
settlement agreement.
To avoid further litigation over the general permits, EPA and the environmental groups entered into another settlement agreement.
4545
The EPA had chosen to flex its legal muscle where The EPA had chosen to flex its legal muscle where scientific data does not justify their actions. Other scientific data does not justify their actions. Other
Federal Agencies have stated the following:Federal Agencies have stated the following:
“. . . For decades, suction dredging has been essentially unmanaged. Its effects were considered insignificant and its consequences immeasurable.” (Siskiyou National Forest Draft Environmental Impact Statement).
And, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers stated, “To regulate against a potential for harm, where none has been shown to exist, is unjustifiable and must be challenged."
4646Presented by Joseph C. Greene, Research Biologist (March 9, 2006 in Salem, Oregon)Presented by Joseph C. Greene, Research Biologist (March 9, 2006 in Salem, Oregon)