Top Banner
1 Self Similar Traffic
15

1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

Jan 04, 2016

Download

Documents

Cody Hicks
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

1

Self Similar Traffic

Page 2: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

2

Self Similarity

• The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different scales on a dimension, such as the time dimension.

• It’s a unifying concept underlying fractals, chaos, power laws, and a common attribute in many laws of nature and in phenomena in the world around us.

Page 3: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

3

Cantor

Each left portion in a step is a full replica of the preceding step

Page 4: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

4

Fractals

Page 5: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

5

What is a Fractal?

• Exhibits self-similarity

• Based on recursive algorithms

• Unique dimensionality

• Scale independent

Page 6: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

6

Network Traffic in the Real World• For years,

traffic was assumed tobe based on Poisson.

• It is now known that this traffic has a self similar pattern.

• Characterized by burstiness.

Page 7: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

7

Self Similarity of Ethernet Traffic

• Seminal paper by W. Leland et al published in 1993, examined Ethernet traffic between 1989 and 1992, gathering 4 sets of data, each lasting 20 to 40 hours, with a resolution of 20 microseconds.

• Paper shattered the illusion of Poison distribution being adequate for traffic analysis.

• Proved Ethernet traffic is self similar with a Hurst factor of H = 0.9

• 0 < H <1 ; the higher H, the more self similar the pattern

Page 8: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

8

Page 9: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

9

• Self-similarity manifests itself in several equivalent fashions:– Slowly decaying variance– Long range dependence– Non-degenerate autocorrelations– Hurst effect

Self-similarity: manifestations

Page 10: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

10

Definition of Self-Similarity

• Self-similar processes are the simplest way to model processes with long-range dependence – correlations that persist (do not degenerate) across large time scales

• The autocorrelation function r(k) of a process (statistical measure of the relationship, if any, between a random variable and itself, at different time lags)with long-range dependence is not summable: – r(k) = inf.– r(k) k- as k inf. for 0 < < 1

• Autocorrelation function follows a power law• Slower decay than exponential process

– Power spectrum is hyperbolic rising to inf. at freq. 0– If r(k) < inf. then you have short-range dependence

Page 11: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

11

Self-Similarity contd.

• Consider a zero-mean stationary time series X = (Xt;t = 1,2,3,…), we define the m-aggregated series X(m) = (Xk

(m);k = 1,2,3,…) by summing X over blocks of size m. We say X is H-self-similar if for all positive m, X(m)

has the same distribution as X rescaled by mH.

• If X is H-self-similar, it has the same autocorrelation function r(k) as the series X(m) for all m. This is actually distributional self-similarity.

• Degree of self-similarity is expressed as the speed of decay of series autocorrelation function using the Hurst parameter

– H = 1 - /2

– For SS series with LRD, ½ < H < 1

– Degree of SS and LRD increases as H 1

Page 12: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

12

Graphical Tests for Self-Similarity

• Variance-time plots

– Relies on slowly decaying variance of self-similar series– The variance of X(m) is plotted versus m on log-log plot

– Slope (- greater than –1 is indicative of SS

• R/S plots

– Relies on rescaled range (R/S)statistic growing like a power law with H as a function of number of points n plotted.

– The plot of R/S versus n on log-log has slope which estimates H

• Periodogram plot

– Relies on the slope of the power spectrum of the series as frequency approaches zero

– The periodogram slope is a straight line with slope – 1 close to the origin

Page 13: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

13

Graphical test examples – VT plot

Page 14: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

14

Graphical test example – R/S plot

Page 15: 1 Self Similar Traffic. 2 Self Similarity The idea is that something looks the same when viewed from different degrees of “magnification” or different.

15

How Inaccurate Are Older Models?