-
1 SAMUEL 4 COMMENTARYEDITED BY GLENN PEASE
1And Samuels word came to all Israel.The Philistines Capture the
ArkNow the Israelites went out to fight against the Philistines.
The Israelites camped at Ebenezer, and the Philistines at
Aphek.
BARNES, "Some attach the opening words to the close of 1 Sam. 3,
as the complement of what is there said, The Lord revealed himself
to Samuel ... in Shiloh, and the word of Samuel went forth to all
Israel. If placed at the commencement of 1 Sam. 4, and in
connection with what follows, they are to be understood in the
sense that Samuel called all Israel to battle against the
Philistines. (Compare 1Sa_7:5.) But this is not the natural
interpretation of the words, which seem clearly to belong to what
went before.
The mention of the Philistines connects the narrative with Judg.
1316. Since the Philistine servitude lasted forty years Jdg_13:1,
and seems to have terminated in the days of Samuel 1Sa_7:13-14 in
about the 20th year of his judgeship 1Sa_7:2; and since it had
already begun before the birth of Samson Jdg_13:5, and Samson
judged Israel for 20 years in the days of the Philistines
Jdg_15:20, it seems to follow that the latter part of the judgeship
of Eli and the early part of that of Samuel must have been
coincident with the lifetime of Samson.Eben-ezer - (or, the stone
of help) The place was afterward so named by Samuel. See the
marginal references. Aphek, or the fortress, was probably the same
as the Aphek of Jos_12:18. It would be toward the western frontier
of Judah, not very far from Mizpeh of Benjamin, and near Shiloh
1Sa_4:4.
CLARKE, "The word of Samuel came to all Israel - This clause
certainly belongs to the preceding chapter, and is so placed by the
Vulgate, Septuagint, Syriac, and Arabic.
Pitched beside Eben-ezer - This name was not given to this place
till more than 1
-
twenty years after this battle, see 1Sa_7:12; for the monument
called haeben haezer, the Stone of Help, was erected by Samuel in
the place which was afterwards from this circumstance, called
Eben-ezer, when the Lord had given the Israelites a signal victory
over the Philistines. It was situated in the tribe of Judah,
between Mizpeh and Shen, and not far from the Aphek here mentioned.
This is another proof that this book was compiled after the times
and transactions which it records, and probably from memoranda
which had been made by a contemporary writer.
GILL, "And the word of Samuel came to all Israel,.... Or was
"known", as the Targum, the word of prophecy by him, which related
to what befell Eli and his family; this was spread throughout the
land, and everyone almost had knowledge of it, and which began to
be fulfilled in the war between Israel and the Philistines, later
related; or the doctrine, instructions, and exhortations of Samuel
to the people of Israel, were by the means of others conveyed
throughout the land; and yet they went into measures which proved
fatal and ruinous to them; or the word of Samuel, which was from
the Lord, came to Israel, to stir them up to go to war with the
Philistines, whereby the punishment threatened to Eli's family
would begin to have its accomplishment: now Israel went out against
the Philistines to battle; according to the word of Samuel, or of
the Lord by him; though Ben Gersom thinks they did this of
themselves, which was their sin, and did not ask counsel of the
Lord, nor of Samuel his prophet; but it seems as if the Philistines
were the aggressors, and first came forth to war against them, and
they went out to meet them (a), as the word is, and defend
themselves as it became them: this was forty years after the death
of Samson, and at the end of Eli's government, who judged Israel so
many years, when they had recruited themselves, and recovered their
losses they sustained by Samson; and when they perceived a new
judge was raised up among the Israelites, who was likely to be of
great service to them, and to prevent their authority over them,
and therefore thought to begin with them as soon as possible: and
pitched beside Ebenezer; a place so called by anticipation, and had
its name from an later victory obtained, when Samuel set up a stone
between Mizpeh and Shen, and called it by this name, 1Sa_7:12, it
signifies a stone of help: and the Philistines pitched in Aphek; a
city in the tribe of Judah, bordering on the Philistines; see Gill
on Jos_12:18.
HENRY, "The first words of this paragraph, which relate to
Samuel, that his word came to all Israel, seem not to have any
reference to the following story, as if it was by any direction of
his that the Israelites went out against the Philistines. Had they
consulted him, though but newly initiated as a prophet, his counsel
might have stood them in more stead than the presence of the ark
did; but perhaps the princes of Israel despised his youth, and
would not have recourse to him as an oracle, and he did not as yet
interpose in public affairs; nor do we find any mention of his name
henceforward till
2
-
some years after (1Sa_7:3), only his word came to all Israel,
that is, people from all parts that were piously disposed had
recourse to him as a prophet and consulted him. Perhaps it is meant
of his prophecy against the house of Eli. This was generally known
and talked of, and all that were serious and observing compared the
events here related, when they came to pass, with the prophecy, and
saw it accomplished in them. Here is,I. A war entered into with the
Philistines, 1Sa_4:1. It was an attempt to throw off the yoke of
their oppression, and would have succeeded better if they had first
repented and reformed, and so begun their work at the right end. It
is computed that this was about the middle of the forty years'
dominion that the Philistines had over Israel (Jdg_13:1) and soon
after the death of Samson; so bishop Patrick, who thinks the
slaughter he made at his death might encourage this attempt; but
Dr. Lightfoot reckons it forty years after Samson's death, for so
long Eli judged, 1Sa_4:18.
JAMISON, "1Sa_4:1-11. Israel overcome by the Philistines.the
word of Samuel came to all Israel The character of Samuel as a
prophet was now fully established. The want of an open vision was
supplied by him, for none of his words were let fall to the ground
(1Sa_3:19); and to his residence in Shiloh all the people of Israel
repaired to consult him as an oracle, who, as the medium of
receiving the divine command, or by his gift of a prophet, could
inform them what was the mind of God. It is not improbable that the
rising influence of the young prophet had alarmed the jealous fears
of the Philistines. They had kept the Israelites in some degree of
subjection ever since the death of Samson and were determined, by
further crushing, to prevent the possibility of their being trained
by the counsels, and under the leadership, of Samuel, to reassert
their national independence. At all events, the Philistines were
the aggressors (1Sa_4:2). But, on the other hand, the Israelites
were rash and inconsiderate in rushing to the field without
obtaining the sanction of Samuel as to the war, or having consulted
him as to the subsequent measures they took.Israel went out against
the Philistines to battle that is, to resist this new
incursion.Eben-ezer ... Aphek Aphek, which means strength, is a
name applied to any fort or fastness. There were several Apheks in
Palestine; but the mention of Eben-ezer determines this Aphek to be
in the south, among the mountains of Judah, near the western
entrance of the pass of Beth-horon, and consequently on the borders
of the Philistine territory. The first encounter at Aphek being
unsuccessful, the Israelites determined to renew the engagement in
better circumstances.
K&D, The two clauses, The word of Samuel came to all Israel,
and Israel went out, etc., are to be logically connected together
in the following sense: At the word or instigation of Samuel,
Israel went out against the Philistines to battle. The Philistines
were ruling over Israel at that time. This is evident, apart from
our previous remarks concerning the connection between the
commencement of this book and the close of the book of Judges, from
the simple fact that the land of Israel was the scene of the war,
and that nothing is said about an invasion on the part of the
Philistines. The Israelites encamped at Ebenezer, and the
Philistines were encamped at Aphek. The name Ebenezer (the stone of
help) was not given to the place so designated till a later period,
when Samuel set up a memorial stone there to commemorate a victory
that was gained 3
-
over the Philistines upon the same chosen battle-field after the
lapse of twenty years (1Sa_7:12). According to this passage, the
stone was set up between Mizpeh and Shen. The former was not the
Mizpeh in the lowlands of Judah (Jos_15:38), but the Mizpeh of
Benjamin (Jos_18:26), i.e., according to Robinson, the present Neby
Samwil, two hours to the north-west of Jerusalem, and half an hour
to the south of Gibeon (see at Jos_18:26). The situation of Aphek
has not been discovered. It cannot have been far from Mizpeh and
Ebenezer, however, and was probably the same place as the
Canaanitish capital mentioned in Jos_12:18, and is certainly
different from the Aphekah upon the mountains of Judah (Jos_15:53);
for this was on the south or south-west of Jerusalem, since,
according to the book of Joshua, it belonged to the towns that were
situated in the district of Gibeon.
BENSON, "1 Samuel 4:1. The word of Samuel came to all Israel The
revelation of Gods mind and will, which had been very rare among
them in former days, (1 Samuel 3:1,) now became frequent and
plentiful. For as Samuel himself was ready to instruct every one
that came to him, so he instituted schools or colleges of prophets,
(as we read in the following parts of this book,) which, in time,
were settled in divers parts of the country, for the better
preserving and spreading the knowledge of God among the people, 1
Samuel 10:5; 1 Samuel 19:18-20. Israel went out against the
Philistines Some have thought they did this at the word of Samuel,
and that he was commanded by God to direct them to go, in order
that they might be humbled and punished for their sins, and so be
prepared for deliverance. But we are not told that they went by
Samuels direction, and it is more likely that they were induced to
take this step by the death of the lords of the Philistines, and
the great slaughter which Samson had made of them at his death,
16:27; 16:30. Or, perhaps the Philistines, having recruited
themselves from that loss, and wishing to be revenged of the
Israelites, had made an inroad into their country, which they might
the rather be induced to do at this time, in consequence of
receiving intelligence that an eminent prophet had arisen in
Israel, by whom they were likely to be united and assisted, and so
to be rendered more formidable, unless they were crushed in the
very beginning of their hopes and efforts.COFFMAN, "THE ARK OF THE
COVENANT WAS CAPTURED BY THE PHILISTINES"And the word of Samuel
came to all Israel" (1 Samuel 4:1a). This statement actually
belongs to the preceding chapter where it appears in a number of
ancient versions.[1] We believe that C. F. Keil was mistaken in his
interpretation that these words were a summons by Samuel for all
Israel to go to war against the Philistines. God's true prophet
would not have led Israel into such a disastrous defeat.
4
-
THE PRELIMINARY BATTLE AT APHEK AND EBENEZER"Now Israel went out
to battle against the Philistines; they encamped at Ebenezer, and
the Philistines encamped at Aphek. The Philistines drew up in line
against Israel, and when the battle spread, Israel was defeated by
the Philistines, who slew about four thousand men on the field of
battle. And when the troops came to the camp, the elders of Israel
said, "Why has the Lord put us to rout today before the
Philistines? Let us bring the ark of the covenant of the Lord here
from Shiloh, that he may come among us and save us from the power
of our enemies." So the people sent to Shiloh, and brought from
there the ark of the covenant of the Lord of hosts, who is
enthroned on the cherubim; and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and
Phinehas, were there with the ark of the covenant of God."
"Ebenezer ... Aphek" (1 Samuel 4:1). There were a number of
Apheks in Palestine, but the mention of nearby Ebenezer indicates
that this one was in the south near the entrance of Beth-horon near
the Philistine border.[2] The mention of "field of battle" (1
Samuel 4:2) appears to indicate that the skirmish was on relatively
level ground, thus enabling the Philistines to use their chariots
of iron to their great advantage.
This conflict with the Philistines was no new thing at all; it
had been going on for centuries. For a brief history of the
Philistines, we refer to my dissertation on this subject in the
Book of Judges.
"The Philistines slew about four thousand men" (1 Samuel 4:2).
We reject the fulminations of critics charging that the figures
concerning casualties in Samuel are "grossly exaggerated." If the
critics know what the casualties actually were, why do they never
tell us what they were?
"The ark of the covenant of the Lord" (1 Samuel 4:3). This, like
countless other instances of the same phenomenon, indicates a
complete familiarity on the part of the elders of Israel with the
appearance and utility of the ark of the covenant as revealed in
the Pentateuch. The cherubim were symbolical representations of
5
-
supernatural creatures adorning the top of the mercy seat
located as a covering for the ark of the covenant; and the
conception that God was "enthroned above the cherubim" was derived
from the Mosaic revelation that the Presence of God Himself was
associated with the ark of the covenant. The ark of the covenant
here is exactly the same as "the ark of God "mentioned in 1 Samuel
3:3.
The notion advanced by the elders of Israel that the presence of
the ark of the covenant in their midst would assure them of victory
could not possibly have been derived from any other source than the
earlier Book of Moses (the Pentateuch) and that of Joshua. Their
fatal mistake in this was that God was leading Israel in those
earlier victories, but, in this case, they were not following any
divine commandment. They had consulted no prophet. They merely
decided to utilize the ark of the covenant as a talisman or fetish
in exactly the same superstitious manner that the pagans used
similar devices supposed to represent their pagan deities. It is no
wonder that it proved to be a futile maneuver.
"So the people brought ... the ark of the covenant; and the two
sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were there with the ark of the
covenant of God" (1 Samuel 4:4)! The exclamation point here is our
own. The passage certainly deserves it. There could not possibly
have been any more incongruous and contradictory elements than: (1)
the sacred ark of the covenant and (2) the scandalous reprobate
sons of Eli serving there as its custodians. There could not have
been anything accidental about the manner in which the inspired
author placed these two OPPOSITE elements in such an eloquent
juxtaposition.COKE, "1 Samuel 4:1. Now Israel went out, &c.
Probably the Israelites were encouraged to this undertaking, by the
confusion into which the Philistines must have been thrown by the
slaughter of their great men which Samson made at his death. The
name Ebenezer was not given to this place till some time after; ch.
1 Samuel 7:12 but it was so called at the time that the historian
wrote this book. ELLICOTT, " (1) And the word of Samuel.To which
portion of the narrative does this statement belong? Is it part of
that account of the Lords dealings with Samuel which closed the
preceding chapter? Does it close that brief narrative which tells
of the Divine voice which called to, and the vision seen by, the
young chosen servant of the Highest, with a note simply relating
how the word of the boy-prophet was received through the varied
tribes of the people? Or does it tell us that at Samuels wordthat
is, acting under his adviceIsrael commenced this new
6
-
disastrous war with the Philistines? By adopting the first
supposition, which understands the words as a general statement
respecting Samuels influence in Israel, the grave difficulty of
supposing that Samuel was mistaken in his first advice to the
people is, of course, removed; but then we have to explain the
separation of this clause from the preceding section in chapter 3,
to which it would appear so naturally to belong; we have also to
account for the exceeding abruptness with which the announcement of
the war with the Philistines follows the clause respecting the word
of Samuel. The Speakers Commentary attempts to solve the problem by
suggesting as the cause of the abruptness that the account of the
battle probably is extracted from some other book in which it came
in naturally and consecutively, and that it was here introduced for
the sake of exhibiting the fulfilment of Samuels prophecy
concerning Elis family. Evidently, however, the Hebrew revisers of
Samuel did not so understand the clause. They have placed the
notice of Samuels words coming to all Israel as introducing the
narrative of the battle.
The compiler of the book, in his relation of the young prophets
error, touches upon an important feature of his great life. Anarchy
and confusion had long prevailed throughout the tribes, and none of
the hero Judges who had as yet been raised to power had succeeded
in restoring the stern, rigid form of theocracy which had made the
Israel of Moses and Joshua so great and powerful. The high
qualities which in his prime had, no doubt, raised Eli to the first
place in the nation, in his old age were almost totally obscured by
a weak affection for his unworthy sons. A terrible picture of the
corruption of the priesthood is presented to us during the last
period of Elis reign. We can well imagine what the ordinary life of
many among the people, with such an example from their religious
guides and temporal governors, must have been. Individual instances
of piety and loyalty to the God of their fathers, such as we see-in
the house of Elkanah, even though such instances were not
unfrequent of themselves, would have been totally insufficient to
preserve the nation from the decay which always follows impiety and
corruption. In this period of moral degradation the Philistines,
part of the original inhabitants of the land, a warlike and
enterprising race, taking advantage of the internal jealousies and
the weaknesses of Israel, made themselves supreme in many portions
of the land, treating the former conquerors often with harshness,
and even with contempt.
Samuel grew up to manhood in the midst of this state of things.
He was conscious that the invisible King, forgotten by so many of
the nation, had chosen him to be the restorer of the chosen people.
The boy-prophet, as he passed out of childhood into
7
-
manhood, does not appear at first to have recognised the depth
of moral degradation into which Israel had sunk, or to have seen
that it was utterly hopeless to attempt to free the people from the
yoke of their Philistine foes until something like a pure national
religion was restored. Samuel and the nobler spirits in Israel, who
thirsted to restore their nation to freedom and to purity, needed a
sharp and bitter experience before they could successfully attempt
the deliverance of the people; so the first call to arms resulted
in utter disaster, and the defeat at Aphekthe result, we believe,
of the summons of Samuelwas the prelude to the crushing blow to the
pride of Israel which soon after deprived them of their leaders,
their choicest warriors, and, above all, of their loved and
cherished Ark of the Covenant, the earthly throne of their unseen
King, the symbol of His ever-presence in their midst.And pitched
beside Eben-ezer.The stones of help. The name was not given to the
place until later, when Samuel set up a stone to commemorate a
victory he gained, some twenty years after, over the Philistines.In
Aphek.With the article, the fortress. Perhaps the same place as the
old Canaauitish royal city Aphek.HAWKER, "This Chapter folds within
its bosom heavy tidings for Israel in general, and Eli's house in
particular. In a battle between the Philistines and Israel, the
Israelites presumptuously, and without taking counsel of the Lord,
bring the ark of God into the camp. The Philistines are again
conquerors; they take the ark of God: the two sons of Eli,
according to the Lord's declaration, are both slain. Tidings coming
to Eli of those events, the old man falls from his seat, and dies;
and his daughter-in-law, Phinehas's wife, in the premature labor of
child-bed, dies also. Such are the woeful contents of this
chapter.
1 Samuel 4:1
(1) And the word of Samuel came to all Israel. Now Israel went
out against the Philistines to battle, and pitched beside Ebenezer:
and the Philistines pitched in Aphek.
By the word of Samuel coming to all Israel, is meant, no doubt,
to show that the Lord had commissioned him, as his servant, that
whether the people would hear, or
8
-
whether they would forbear, they should know that there was a
prophet of the Lord among them. Ezekiel 2:5.
CONSTABLE, "Verse 1
II. THE HISTORY OF THE ARK OF THE COVENANT 4:1-7:1
Many serious students of 1 Samuel have noted the writer's
emphasis on the ark of the covenant that begins here in the text.
Critical scholars have long argued that 1 Samuel 4:1 b to 1 Samuel
7:1 and 2 Samuel 6 are the only remaining fragments of an older and
longer ark narrative, which was a source document for the writer
here. Of the 61 references to the ark in 1 and 2 Samuel, 36 appear
in 1 Samuel 4:1 b to 1 Samuel 7:2. More recently some scholars have
come to believe that the old ark narratives were somewhat shorter.
Conservative scholars generally believe that the ark narratives
were not necessarily independent documents but may simply reflect
the writer's particular emphasis on the ark here. [Note: For a
discussion of this subject, including a bibliography of books and
articles dealing with it, see Youngblood, pp. 593-94.] One writer
believed that their purpose was to explain Israel's demand for a
king, as well as the reasons for the end of Eli's branch of the
Aaronic family. [Note: Merrill, "1 Samuel," p. 208.]
Verses 1-11
1. The battle of Aphek 4:1-11
The Philistines, as we have already seen in Judges, were
Israel's primary enemy to the west at this time. Samson, too,
fought the Philistines (Judges 13-16). [Note: For a good, brief
history of the Philistines, see Edward Hindson, The Philistines and
the Old Testament.] There are about 150 references to the
Philistines in 1 and 2 Samuel. They originally migrated from Greece
primarily by way of Crete (Caphtor, cf. Genesis 10:14; Jeremiah
47:4; Amos 9:7). Their major influx into Canaan occurred about 1200
B.C., about 100 years before the events recorded in this
chapter.
9
-
However there were some Philistines in Canaan as early as
Abraham's day (Genesis 21:32; et al.). [Note: For further study,
see Trude Dothan, The Philistines and Their Material Culture,
especially pp. 13-16, 21-24, and 289-96.]
The town of Aphek (cf. 1 Samuel 29:1; New Testament Antipatris,
Acts 23:31) stood on the border between Philistine and Israelite
territory. It was about 11 miles east and a little north of Joppa
(and modern Tel Aviv). Archaeologists have not yet located
Ebenezer, but it was obviously close to Aphek and on Israel's side
of the border. It may have been the modern Izbet Sarteh about two
miles east of Aphek on the road to Shiloh. [Note: Moshe Kochavi and
Aaron Demsky, "An Israelite Village from the Days of the Judges,"
Biblical Archaeology Review 4:3 (1978):19-21.]
In Israel's first encounter with the Philistines in 1 Samuel,
the enemy slew 4,000 Israelite soldiers (1 Samuel 4:2), and in the
second, 30,000 Israelites fell (1 Samuel 4:10). Between these two
encounters the Israelites sent to Shiloh for the ark. The ark had
always been the place where God dwelt in a special way among the
Israelites. It contained the tablets of the Decalogue and the mercy
seat where the high priest atoned for the sins of the nation. It
was for these reasons a symbol of God and His presence. During the
long period of the judges the Israelites as a whole had adopted an
increasingly pagan attitude toward Yahweh. They felt that they
could satisfy Him with simply formal worship and that they could
secure His help with offerings rather than humility. They were
treating the ark the same way they treated God; they believed the
ark's presence among them in battle would ensure victory.
"We eventually all learn what Israel discovered in battle
against the Philistines. Having the paraphernalia of God and having
God are not the same." [Note: Kenneth L. Chafin, 1, 2 Samuel, p.
54.]
The paraphernalia that modern believers sometimes rely on in
place of God include a crucifix, a picture of Jesus, or a family
Bible positioned conspicuously in the home but seldom read. Others
base their hope of spiritual success on a spiritually strong
spouse, regular church attendance, or even the daily reading of the
Bible. These things, as good as they may be, are no substitute for
a vital personal relationship with God.
10
-
Perhaps the elders of Israel remembered that in Joshua's
conquest of Jericho, the ark played a very important and visible
part in the victory (Joshua 6:2-20). Nevertheless, back then the
people trusted in Yahweh, not in the ark as a talisman (good luck
charm). The custom of taking idols into battle so their gods would
deliver them was common among ancient warriors (cf. 2 Samuel 5:21;
1 Chronicles 14:12). Obviously the Israelites were wrong in
thinking that the presence of the ark would guarantee success.
"The offenses against the ark as pledge of Yahweh's presence
appear to be mainly of two kinds: (1) a misplaced reliance on the
ark, and (2) an irreverent disregard for the ark." [Note: Marten H.
Woudstra, The Ark of the Covenant from the Conquest to Kingship, p.
55.]
The Hebrew word eleph, translated thousand (1 Samuel 4:2), can
also mean military unit. Military units were of varying sizes but
considerably smaller than 1,000 soldiers. [Note: For more
information concerning the problem of large numbers in the Old
Testament, see R. E. D. Clark, "The Large Numbers of the Old
Testament," Journal of Transactions of the Victoria Institute 87
(1955):82-92; and J. W. Wenham, "Large Numbers in the Old
Testament," Tyndale Bulletin 18 (1967):19-53.]
Ancient Near Eastern artists sometimes pictured a king sitting
on a throne supported on either side by a cherub, which the artist
represented as a winged lion (sphinx) with a human head. [Note: W.
F. Albright, "What Were the Cherubim?" Biblical Archaeologist 1:1
(1938):1-3.] This may have been the image of the Lord of hosts
(armies) "who sits above the cherubim" that the writer had in mind
here (1 Samuel 4:4).
The fact that the people shouted loudly when the ark arrived at
Ebenezer from Shiloh (1 Samuel 4:5) may be another indication that
they were hoping to duplicate the victory at Jericho (cf. Joshua
6:20). Likewise the response of the Philistines when they heard the
cry recalls Rahab's revelation of how the Canaanites feared Yahweh
(Joshua 2:9-11). These allusions to the victory at Jericho contrast
the
11
-
Israelites' present attitude toward God with what it had been at
that earlier battle.
The fact that the Israelites suffered a devastating slaughter
(Heb. makkah, 1 Samuel 4:10), many times worse than their earlier
recent defeat (1 Samuel 4:2), proved that victory did not come from
the ark but from the Lord. Defeat was due to sin in the camp,
including Hophni and Phinehas' sin (cf. 1 Samuel 2:25). Israel had
suffered defeat at Ai about 300 years earlier for the same reason:
sin among the people (Joshua 7:11). Trying to duplicate previous
spiritual victories by going through the same procedures is no
substitute for getting right with God (cf. Judges 16:20; Matthew
23:25).
God did not record the destruction of the tabernacle at Shiloh,
but some writers assume the Philistines razed it after they
captured the ark. [Note: E.g., Joyce Baldwin, 1 & 2 Samuel, p.
71; and Charles Pfeiffer and Howard Vos, The Wycliffe Historical
Geography of Bible Lands, p. 143.] The town probably did suffer
destruction then (cf. Jeremiah 7:12; Jeremiah 7:14; Jeremiah 26:6).
[Note: See John Bright, A History of Israel, p. 165.] However, the
writer of Chronicles mentioned that the tabernacle still stood in
David's day (1 Chronicles 21:29) and when Solomon began to reign (2
Chronicles 1:3). The writer of Samuel showed less interest in the
sanctuary structure than in the ark. The Philistines may have
destroyed the town of Shiloh, but it "revived sufficiently to
produce a few worthy citizens in later generations (cf. 1 Kings
11:29; Jeremiah 41:5)." [Note: Gordon, p. 96.]A. The Capture of the
Ark 4:1-22
A new subject comes to the forefront in this section and
continues to be a significant motif throughout the rest of Samuel.
It is the ark of the covenant. The writer drew attention to the ark
in this chapter by mentioning it seven times, including a notation
at the end of each text section (1 Samuel 4:4; 1 Samuel 4:11; 1
Samuel 4:17-19; 1 Samuel 4:21-22). Following the reference to
Samuel the prophet in 1 Samuel 4:1, the writer did not mention him
again until 1 Samuel 7:3.
"The purpose of the story in 1 Samuel 4-6 of the ark's
imprisonment in Philistia and its travels to different Philistine
cities, as well as to Beth-Shemesh, is to give an historical
background for the Philistines' rule over the whole country prior
to the
12
-
emergence of the Israelite state which could still accentuate
Yahweh's supremacy as an unconquerable deity. The story explains
how Yahweh finally became superior to his captors." [Note: G. W.
Ahlstrom, "The Travels of the Ark: A Religio-Political
Composition," Journal of Near Eastern Studies 43 (1984):143. See
also Antony F. Campbell, "Yahweh and the Ark: A Case Study in
Narrative," Journal of Biblical Literature 98:1 (1979):31-43.]The
major historical element of continuity in this section is the fate
of Eli's sons (1 Samuel 4:9-11). The theological theme of fertility
continues to be the primary unifying factor in the narrative.LANGE,
"SAMUELS WORK AS PROPHET, PRIEST AND JUDGE
1Sam. 4:1b 7
FIRST SECTION
Infliction of the Punishment prophesied by Samuel on the House
of Eli and on all Israel in the unfortunate Battle with the
Philistines
1 Samuel 4:1 to 1 Samuel 7:1
I. Israels double defeat and loss of the Ark. 1 Samuel
4:1-11
1Now[FN1] [And] Israel went out against the Philistines to
battle, and pitched beside 2 Ebenezer[FN2]; and the Philistines
pitched in Aphek. And the Philistines put themselves in array
against Israel, and when [om. when] they joined battle[FN3], [ins.
and] Israel was smitten before the Philistines, and they slew of
the army in the field 3 about four thousand men. And when the
people were come [And the people came] into the camp, [ins. and]
the elders of Israel said, Wherefore hath the Lord [Jehovah]
smitten us to-day before the Philistines? Let us [We will] fetch
the ark of the covenant[FN4]of the Lord [Jehovah] [ins. to us] out
of [from] Shiloh unto us [om. unto us], that, when it cometh [and
it shall come] among us [into our
13
-
midst] 4it may [om. it may, ins. and] save us out of the hand of
our enemies. So [And] the people sent to Shiloh that they might
bring [and brought] from [om. from] thence the ark of the covenant
of the Lord [Jehovah] of hosts, which dwelleth between the
cherubims [who sitteth upon the cherubim[FN5]]; and the two sons of
Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were there[FN6] with the ark of the
covenant of God.
5And [ins. it came to pass], when the ark of the covenant of the
Lord [Jehovah] came into the camp, all Israel shouted with a great
shout, so that the earth rang 6 again[FN7]. And when [om. when] the
Philistines heard the noise of the shout [ins. and] they said, What
meaneth the noise of this great shout in the camp of the Hebrews?
And they understood that the ark of the Lord [Jehovah] was come
into 7 the camp. And the Philistines were afraid, for they said,
God[FN8] is come into the camp. And they said, Woe unto us ! for
there hath not been such a thing heretofore 8 Woe unto us! who
shall deliver us out of the hand of these mighty gods? these are
the gods that smote the Egyptians with all the plagues [every sort
of 9 plague] in the wilderness[FN9]? Be strong, and quit yourselves
like men, O ye Philistines, that ye be not servants unto the
Hebrews, as they have been to you; quit 10 yourselves like men and
fight. And the Philistines fought, and Israel was smitten, and they
fled every man to his tent [tents[FN10]]; and there was a very
great slaughter [the slaughter was very great], for [and] there
fell of Israel thirty thousand footmen 11 And the ark of God was
taken, and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were slain
[the two sons of Eli perished, Hophni and Phinehas.]
EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL
1 Samuel 4:1. Israels march to battle against the Philistines
does not stand in pragmatical connection with the preceding words
and the word of Samuel came to all Israel, as if this latter meant
a summons to war with the Philistines (as is held by most of the
older expositors, and, among the later, by Keil and O. v. Gerlach.)
Rather these words conclude and sum up the description of the
origin and commencement of the prophets work and of his
announcement of the word of the Lord. We are now introduced
immediately to the scene of the history, on which Samuel will
henceforth appear as the Lords instrument, a position he has
reached by the call in 1 Samuel 3:1 to 1 Samuel 4:1 a. The
narrative sets us straightway into the midst of Israels conflict
with the Philistines. That the latter were now already in the land
is assumed in the narrative, since not only is nothing said of an
incursion by
14
-
them, but the expression the Israelites went out against the
Philistines in connection with the succeeding statement of the
place of encampment points to the fact that the Philistines had
already possessed themselves of the land.[FN11] In support of the
view that Samuel summoned the Israelites to war Clericus remarks
that he did it in Gods name, that they might be punished by a
defeat; but this is inconsistent with the divine justice. The
pressure of the Philistine yoke, under which Israel groaned, was
already a punishment from God. If this defeat also is so regarded,
it can be only on the supposition that the Israelites hazarded this
battle not by Gods will, and therefore without a summons by Samuel.
The name of the Israelitish camp, Ebenezer, is here given by
anticipation, its origin being related in 1 Samuel 7:12, on the
occasion of the victory of the Israelites over the Philistines,
twenty years after this defeat. According to 1 Samuel 7:12 it was
near Mizpeh in Benjamin, Joshua 18:26; from which we must
distinguish the Mizpeh in the lowland of Judah, Joshua 15:38. Aphek
cannot have been far from this, and is therefore perhaps the same
place with the Canaanitish royal city Aphek ( Joshua 12:18), and
decidedly a different place from the Aphekah in the hill-country of
Judah ( Joshua 15:53); for the latter lay south or southeast of
Jerusalem, since, according to Josh. loc. cit, it was one of the
cities which lay in the neighborhood of Gibeon.[FN12] (Keil)In 1
Samuel 4:2 an orderly battle-array on both sides is described. The
does not describe the spreading of the tumult of battle (as is
clear from the following statement that the Israelites were beaten
in the line of battle, and thence made an orderly retreat to their
camp), but the sudden mutual assault of the opposing lines (Vulg.:
inito proelio). It is said: Israel was smitten before the
Philistines, with reference to the local relation and the
victorious superiority of the Philistines, but at the same time in
respect of God s punishing hand which therein showed itself, as is
expressly declared in In 1 Samuel 4:3.[FN13] The Israelites lost in
the battlein the field, that Isaiah, in the plain, about4000
men.PETT, " The Ark As The Focal Point Of The Kingship Of YHWH
(4:1b-7:14).
The emphasis in this subsection is on the Kingship of YHWH as
revealed by the Ark which is the symbol of His Kingship. Because of
His people s disobedience and sinfulness as revealed through their
priesthood YHWH refuses to act to deliver Israel, and allows the
Ark to be taken. But when the Ark is brought to Ashdod the idol
Dagon falls before YHWH and is smashed
15
-
to pieces. Thus even in Ashdod YHWH is revealed as King. Then
through plague, and a multiplying of vermin, YHWH brings His
judgment on them because of the disrespect that they have shown to
the Ark, so that in the end the Philistines recognise that they
must return it to Israel along with suitable homage in the form of
Gifts.
But those who receive it in Israel also treat it with
disrespect, even though they are priests, demonstrating that their
hearts are not right towards YHWH, and they too are therefore
smitten and punished, and the Ark is then placed in a household
where it is respected and honoured, and where it will remain for
many years.
The King being therefore once again among His people they learn,
after a twenty-year period of mourning during which He is silent,
that if they will turn from their idols and seek Him, He will
deliver them from the Philistines. And, as a result of the prayers
of His prophet Samuel, the Philistines are then driven from the
land.
We are not to see the Ark as forgotten. It is its very presence
in Israel that evidences the fact that YHWH has not finally
deserted His people, and the writer intends us to see its presence
as indicating that YHWH is still there as Israels King, overseeing
their future both for good and bad.
Analysis.
16
-
a The Philistines defeat Israel and capture the Ark of God (1
Samuel 4:1-22).
b The Ark of God is taken to Ashdod and the idol Dagon falls
before YHWH and is smashed in pieces (1 Samuel 5:1-5).
c The Ark of God brings misery and plague on the Philistines who
disrespect it (1 Samuel 5:6-12).
d The Ark of God is returned to Israel with reparations (1
Samuel 6:1-16).
c The Ark of God brings misery on the Israelites who disrespect
it (1 Samuel 6:17 to 1 Samuel 7:2).
b The Ark of God is suitably re-established in Israel and they
are promised that if they return to YHWH and put away their
idolatry they will be delivered from the Philistines (1 Samuel
7:3-4).
a The Ark having been restored, Israel defeat the Philistines
through the prayers of Samuel (1 Samuel 7:5-14).
Note that in a the Philistines defeat Israel and the Ark of God
is defiled, while in the parallel the Ark of God is re-established
and Israel defeat the Philistines. In b the Ark is taken to Ashdod
and the idol Dagon falls before
17
-
it and is smashed in pieces, and in the parallel, on the
restoration of the Ark Israel are called on to denounce their
idols. In c the Ark bring misery on the Philistines who disrespect
it and in the parallel it brings misery on the people of Israel who
disrespect it. In d the Ark of God returns in triumph to Israel,
being duly honoured by the Philistines.
Chapter 4.
There can be little doubt that in this chapter we are being
brought back to a period before Samuels full influence began to be
felt. Eli was now even more infirm, and his sons were no doubt in
full command. Samuel as a youth was still serving faithfully in the
Tabernacle. Israel was now once again experiencing powerful
pressure from the Philistine overlords who were wanting to carve
out an empire for themselves. The Philistines had seemingly got
over their losses brought about by Samson s martyrdom. And Israel
had no one to look to but two decadent priests.
The Battle of Aphek: The Philistines Defeat Israel And Capture
the Ark of God (1 Samuel 4:1-22).
Not long after God had spoken to the young Samuel the Israelites
rose against the dominance of their Philistine masters in order to
cast off their yoke. This may have occurred around the time of the
death of Samson, when the Philistines would be in some disarray at
the loss of many of their leaders, an event which may well have
stirred Israel to think that it could free itself. It is noteworthy
that they did not consult the young Samuel. His reputation
18
-
was not yet established. Nor did they seek to YHWH. They were
acting on their own initiative. Whatever their outward profession
they were not in submission to the Kingship of YHWH.
The call to the tribes would go out from the central sanctuary
at Shiloh, and the consequence was that Israel gathered an army in
order to gain their freedom from having to submit to the
Philistines and pay tribute. But Israel had no experienced military
leader and were mainly farmers gathered together to defend their
lands, and worst of all at this stage, they had no one to guide
them in their decisions, for the young Samuel was still developing,
and Elis sons ruled in the Tabernacle. The Philistines on the other
hand were an experienced military aristocracy who had arrived from
Crete and from the Aegean a hundred or so years before and had
settled in the Coastal Plain and they were accompanied by Canaanite
farmers over whom they ruled and whom they had conscripted to
service, the Canaanites probably hoping for a share in great
booty.
It will be noted that there was no preparation of heart on the
part of Israel, no seeking to YHWH. Their priests were not the kind
who genuinely sought YHWHs guidance about anything. They simply had
a vague hope that YHWH would help them, and a superstitious trust
in the Ark.
The chapter divides into two parts, the first part describes the
actual battle itself and the bringing into service of the Ark,
followed by its capture, the second part describes the after
effects on Israel.PULPIT, "1 Samuel 4:1
19
-
And the word of Samuel... all Israel. This clause is rightly
connected with the foregoing verse of the previous chapter in the
Syriac and Vulgate. Attached to the fourth chapter, it gives a
wrong sense, namely, that Samuel gave the command for the
assembling of all Israel for battle with the Philistines. This is
so plainly erroneous that the A.V. dissents from it by translating
the and in the next clause by now. Joined to the previous chapter,
it gives the true meaning. Because Samuel spake by the word of
Jehovah, therefore his word came to all Israel, that is, it was a
binding and authoritative command throughout the whole land; or, in
other words, when Samuel was acknowledged to be Jehovah's prophet
he also became the virtual judge of Israel, though probably he did
not act with full authority until after Eli's death.
DEFEAT OF ISRAEL AND CAPTURE OF THE ARK (1 Samuel 4:1-11).
Now Israelrather. And Israelwent out against the Philistines.
During the declining years of Eli, the yoke of the Philistines,
which apparently had been shaken off in his manhood, began once
again to press heavily upon the neck of Israel. But Israel was
still strong enough to make valiant resistance, provoked apparently
by the Philistines invading the land, as we find that they had
pitched, i.e. encamped, in Aphok. As Aphek means a fortress, many
places bear the name; but the position of the Philistine camp is
fixed by its being near both to Eben-ezer and to Mizpah, and
probably, therefore, it was the Aphek in Judah (Joshua 12:18).
Eben-ezer, the stone of help, had not as yet received this name
(see 1 Samuel 7:12); and apparently it was not a town, but a
monument set up m an open plain fit for the purposes of war, and
which up to this time had. no specific appellation.
20
-
2 The Philistines deployed their forces to meet Israel, and as
the battle spread, Israel was defeated by the Philistines, who
killed about four thousand of them on the battlefield.
CLARKE, "Put themselves in array - There is no doubt that both
the Philistines and Israelites had what might be called the art of
war, according to which they marshalled their troops in the field,
constructed their camps, and conducted their retreats, sieges,
etc.; but we know not the principles on which they acted.
They slew of the army in the field about four thousand men -
This must have been a severe conflict, as four thousand were left
dead on the field of battle. The contest also must have lasted some
considerable time, as these were all slain hand to hand; swords and
spears being in all probability the only weapons then used.
GILL, "And the Philistines put themselves in array against
Israel ,.... Prepared for battle, and put themselves in a posture
for it; formed themselves in a line of battle, and so invited and
challenged the Israelites to fight them:and when they joined battle
; engaged with each other, the Israelites doing the same, putting
themselves in a proper form and posture for fighting; or "the
battle was spread", or "spread itself" (b); that is, as the Targum,
they that made war were spread; the soldiers were placed in order
for battle, to the right and left, which took up on both sides a
large space; though Abarbinel understands this in a very different
sense, and takes the word to have the same signification as in
Psa_78:60, where it has the sense of forsaking; and so here the
Israelites forsook the battle, and fled, which brought on their
destruction, flight being, as the Jews say (c), the beginning of
fall or
21
-
ruin, as it follows:Israel was smitten before the Philistines ;
they had the worst of it and were beaten:and they slew of the army
in the field about four thousand men ; so many fell upon the spot,
in the field.
HENRY, "And the Philistines put themselves in array against
Israel ,.... Prepared for battle, and put themselves in a posture
for it; formed themselves in a line of battle, and so invited and
challenged the Israelites to fight them:and when they joined battle
; engaged with each other, the Israelites doing the same, putting
themselves in a proper form and posture for fighting; or "the
battle was spread", or "spread itself" (b); that is, as the Targum,
they that made war were spread; the soldiers were placed in order
for battle, to the right and left, which took up on both sides a
large space; though Abarbinel understands this in a very different
sense, and takes the word to have the same signification as in
Psa_78:60, where it has the sense of forsaking; and so here the
Israelites forsook the battle, and fled, which brought on their
destruction, flight being, as the Jews say (c), the beginning of
fall or ruin, as it follows:Israel was smitten before the
Philistines ; they had the worst of it and were beaten:and they
slew of the army in the field about four thousand men ; so many
fell upon the spot, in the field.
HAWKER, "(2) And the Philistines put themselves in array against
Israel: and when they joined battle, Israel was smitten before the
Philistines: and they slew of the army in the field about four
thousand men.This spot of Ebenezer, where the Philistines pitched
their army, was made memorable in the after battles of Israel.
About twenty years after, here it was that Samuel set up the stone
of help, and called it Ebenezer. And doth not our God now
sometimes, and not unfrequently, make that very spot memorable
where afflictions and soul-searching situations first begin?
The
22
-
heavy slaughter in this battle of the army of Israel, by the
uncircumcised Philistines, loudly testified the Lord's displeasure
at the sin of his people. The Lord had said, that if they despised
his statutes, and abhorred his judgments, he would set his face
against them, and they should he slain of their enemies; and here
we see it; Leviticus 26:15; Lev_26:17.K&D, 1Sa_4:2
When the battle was fought, the Israelites were defeated by the
Philistines, and in battle-array four thousand men were smitten
upon the field. , sc., , as in Jdg_20:20, Jdg_20:22, etc. , in
battle-array, i.e., upon the field of battle, not in flight. In the
field, i.e., the open field where the battle was fought.
3 When the soldiers returned to camp, the elders of Israel
asked, Why did the Lord bring defeat on us today before the
Philistines? Let us bring the ark of the Lords covenant from
Shiloh, so that he may go with us and save us from the hand of our
enemies.
BARNES, "In the evening of the defeat of the Israelites the
elders held a council, and resolved to send for the ark, which is
described in full, as implying that in virtue of the covenant God
could not but give them the victory (compare Num_10:35;
Jos_3:10).
CLARKE, "Let us fetch the ark - They vainly supposed that the
ark could save them, when the God of it had departed from them
because of their wickedness. They knew that in former times their
fathers had been beaten by their enemies, when they took not the
ark with them to battle; as in the case of their wars with the
Canaanites, Num_14:44, Num_14:45; and that they had conquered when
they took this with them, as in the case of the destruction of
Jericho, Jos_6:4. From the latter clause they took
23
-
confidence; but the cause of their miscarriage in the former
they laid not to heart. It was customary with all the nations of
the earth to take their gods and sacred ensigns with them to war.
The Persians, Indians, Greeks, Romans, Germans, Philistines, etc.,
did so. Consecrated crosses, blessing and hallowing of colors and
standards, are the modern remains of those ancient
superstitions.
GILL, "And when the people came into the camp,.... At Ebenezer,
where they pitched their tents, and from whence they went out to
battle, and whither they returned after their defeat: the elders of
Israel said, wherefore hath the Lord smitten us today before the
Philistines? they were right in ascribing it to the Lord, who had
suffered them to be defeated by their enemies, but it is strange
they should be so insensible of the cause of it; there was a reason
ready at hand, their sins and iniquities were the cause of it, the
corruption of manners among them, their neglect of bringing their
offerings to the Lord, and the idolatry that many of them were
guilty of, at least secretly, 1Sa_2:24 to punish them for which,
they were brought into this war, and smitten in it; and yet they
wonder at it, that so it should be, that they the people of God
should be smitten before Heathens and uncircumcised Philistines;
and the rather, since they went to battle with them according to
the word of the Lord by Samuel; not considering that they went into
this war without humiliation for their sins, and without praying to
God for success, and that it was intended as a correction of them
for their offences against God: let us fetch the ark of the
covenant of the Lord out of Shiloh unto us; in which the law was,
sometimes called the covenant between God and them; and which was a
symbol of the divine Presence, for want of which they supposed they
had not the presence of God with them, and so had not success; and
the rather they were encouraged to take this step and method,
because that formerly Israel had success against their enemies when
the ark was with them, Num_31:6 though no doubt in this there was
an overruling providence of God, by which they were led to take
such a step as this, in order to bring the two sons of Eli into the
camp, that they might be slain in one day, according to the divine
prediction: that when it cometh among us, it may save us out of the
hand of our enemies; foolishly placing their confidence in an
external symbol, and not in the Lord himself; ascribing salvation
to that, which only belongs to him, whether of a temporal or
spiritual kind: and such folly and vanity are men guilty of when
they seek to, make use of, and trust in anything short of Christ
for salvation; as in carnal descent; in the rituals of the law; in
the ordinances of the Gospel; in any religious exercises, private
or public; or in any works of righteousness done by them: in Christ
alone is salvation from spiritual enemies; and indeed from the Lord
only is salvation and deliverance from temporal enemies.
HENRY 3-4, "III. The measures they concerted for another
engagement. A council of war was called, and, instead of resolving
to fast and pray and amend their lives, so ill taught were they
(and no wonder when they had such teachers) that, 1. They
quarrelled with God for appearing against them (1Sa_4:3): Wherefore
has the Lord smitten us? If
24
-
they meant this as an enquiry into the cause of God's
displeasure, they needed not go far to find that out. It was plain
enough; Israel had sinned, though they were not willing to see it
and own it. But it rather seems that they expostulate boldly with
God about it, are displeased at what God has done, and dispute the
matter with him. They own the hand of God in their trouble (so far
was right): It is the Lord that has smitten us; but, instead of
submitting to it, they quarrel with it, and speak as those that are
angry at him and his providence, and not aware of any just
provocation they have given him: Wherefore shall we, that are
Israelites, be smitten before the Philistines? How absurd and
unjust is it! Note, The foolishness of man perverts his way, and
then his heart frets against the Lord (Pro_19:3) and finds fault
with him. 2. They imagined that they could oblige him to appear for
them the next time by bringing the ark into their camp. The elders
of Israel were so ignorant and foolish as to make the proposal
(1Sa_4:3), and the people soon put it in execution, 1Sa_4:4. They
sent to Shiloh for the ark, and Eli had not courage enough to
detain it, but sent his ungodly sons, Hophni and Phinehas, along
with it, at least permitted them to go, though he knew that
wherever they went the curse of God went along with them. Now see
here, (1.) The profound veneration the people had for the ark. O
send for that, and it will do wonders for us. The ark was, by
institution, a visible token of God's presence. God had said that
he would dwell between the cherubim,which were over the ark and
were carried along with it; now they thought that, by paying a
great respect to this sacred chest, they should prove themselves to
be Israelites indeed, and effectually engage God Almighty to appear
in their favour. Note, It is common for those that have estranged
themselves from the vitals of religion to discover a great fondness
for the rituals and external observances of it, for those that even
deny the power of godliness not only to have, but to have in
admiration, the form of it. The temple of the Lord is cried up, and
the ark of the Lord stickled for with a great deal of seeming zeal
by multitudes that have no regard at all for the Lord of the temple
and the God of the ark, as if a fiery concern for the name of
Christianity would atone for a profane contempt of the thing. And
yet indeed they did but make an idol of the ark, and looked upon it
to be as much an image of the God of Israel as those idols which
the heathen worshipped were of their gods. To worship the true God,
and not to worship him as God, is in effect not to worship him at
all. (2.) Their egregious folly in thinking that the ark, if they
had it in their camp, would certainly save them out of the hand of
their enemies,and bring victory back to their side. For, [1.] When
the ark set forward Moses prayed, Rise up, Lord, and let thy
enemies be scattered, well knowing that it was not the ark moving
with them, but God appearing for them, that must give them success;
and here were no proper means used to engage God to favour them
with his presence; what good then would the ark do them, the shell
without the kernel? [2.] They were so far from having God's leave
to remove his ark that he had plainly enough intimated to them in
his law that when they were settled in Canaan his ark should be
settled in the place that he should choose (Deu_12:5, Deu_12:11),
and that they must come to it, not it to them. How then could they
expect any advantage by it when they had not a just and legal
possession of it, nor any warrant to remove it from its place?
Instead of honouring God by what they did, they really affronted
him. Nay, [3.] If there had been nothing else to invalidate their
expectations from the ark, how could they expect it should bring a
blessing when Hophni and Phinehas were the men that carried it? It
would have given too much countenance to their villany if the ark
had done any kindness to Israel while it was in the hands of those
graceless priests.
25
-
JAMISON, "Let us fetch the ark of the covenant of the Lord out
of Shiloh unto us Strange that they were so blind to the real cause
of the disaster and that they did not discern, in the great and
general corruption of religion and morals (1Sa_2:22-25; 1Sa_7:3;
Psa_78:58), the reason why the presence and aid of God were not
extended to them. Their first measure for restoring the national
spirit and energy ought to have been a complete reformation - a
universal return to purity of worship and morals. But, instead of
cherishing a spirit of deep humiliation and sincere repentance,
instead of resolving on the abolition of existing abuses, and the
re-establishing of the pure faith, they adopted what appeared an
easier and speedier course - they put their trust in ceremonial
observances, and doubted not but that the introduction of the ark
into the battlefield would ensure their victory. In recommending
this extraordinary step, the elders might recollect the confidence
it imparted to their ancestors (Num_10:35; Num_14:44), as well as
what had been done at Jericho. But it is more probable that they
were influenced by the heathenish ideas of their idolatrous
neighbors, who carried their idol Dagon, or his sacred symbols, to
their wars, believing that the power of their divinities was
inseparably associated with, or residing in, their images. In
short, the shout raised in the Hebrew camp, on the arrival of the
ark, indicated very plainly the prevalence among the Israelites at
this time of a belief in national deities - whose influence was
local, and whose interest was especially exerted in behalf of the
people who adored them. The joy of the Israelites was an emotion
springing out of the same superstitious sentiments as the
corresponding dismay of their enemies; and to afford them a
convincing, though painful proof of their error, was the ulterior
object of the discipline to which they were now subjected - a
discipline by which God, while punishing them for their apostasy by
allowing the capture of the ark, had another end in view - that of
signally vindicating His supremacy over all the gods of the
nations.
BENSON, "1 Samuel 4:3-4. Wherefore hath the Lord smitten us?
This was strange blindness, that when there was so great a
corruption in their worship and manners, they could not see
sufficient reason why God should suffer them to fall by their
enemies. Let us fetch the ark That great pledge of Gods presence
and help, by whose conduct our ancestors obtained success. Instead
of humbling themselves for, and purging themselves from their sins,
for which God was displeased with them, they take an easier and
cheaper course, and put their trust in their ceremonial
observances, not doubting but the very presence of the ark would
give them the victory. That they might bring the ark This they
should not have done without asking counsel of God.COKE, "1 Samuel
4:3. Wherefore hath the Lord smitten us to-day The Israelites seem
not only to have undertaken this war without consulting God, but to
have vainly thought that, as being His people, they must
necessarily be crowned with success; and in this vain confidence,
they send for the ark of the covenant; not considering, that there
could be little hope of God's assistance while they lived in
notorious disobedience to his laws.
26
-
ELLICOTT, " (3) Wherefore hath the Lord smitten us?The people
and the elders who, as we have seen above, had undertaken the war
of liberty at the instigation or the young man of God, amazed at
their defeat, were puzzled to understand why God was evidently not
in their midst; they showed by their next procedure how thoroughly
they had gone astray from the old pure religion.
Let us fetch the ark of the covenant.Whether or not Samuel
acquiesced in this fatal proposition we have no information. It
evidently did not emanate from him. but, as we are expressly told,
from the elders of the people. Probably the lesson of the first
defeat had deeply impressed him, and he saw that a thorough
reformation throughout the land was needed before the invisible
King would again be present among the people.
It may save us.It was a curious delusion, this baseless hope of
the elders, that the unseen God was inseparably connected with that
strange and beautiful symbol of His presence, with that coffer of
perishable wood and metal overshadowed by the lifeless golden
angels carved on the shining seat which closed this sacred Arkthat
glittering mercy seat, as it was called, round which so many
hallowed memories of the glory vision had gathered. Far on in the
peoples story, one of the greatest of Samuels successors, Jeremiah,
presses home the same truth the people were so slow in learning,
when he passionately urges his Israel, Trust ye not in lying words,
saying The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord, the temple
of the Lord are these. For if ye thoroughly amend your ways and
your doings, then will I cause you to dwell in this place, in the
land that 1 gave to your fathers, for ever and ever (Jeremiah
7:4-5; Jeremiah 7:7).
Wordsworth here, with great force, thus writes:Probably David
remembered this history when, with a clearer faith, he refused to
allow the Ark to be carried with him in his retreat before Absalom
out of Jerusalem; and even when the priests had brought it forth,
he commanded them to carry it back to its place, saying, If I shall
find favour in the eyes of the Lord, He will bring me again, and
show me both it and His habitation. (2 Samuel 15:25.)
David, without the Ark visibly present, but with the unseen help
of Him who was
27
-
enthroned on the mercy-seat, triumphed, and was restored to
Jerusalem; but Israel, with the Ark visibly present, but without
the blessing of Him whose throne the Ark was, fell before their
enemies, and were deprived of the sacred symbol, which was taken by
the Philistines.HAWKER, "(3) And when the people were come into the
camp, the elders of Israel said, Wherefore hath the LORD smitten us
today before the Philistines? Let us fetch the ark of the covenant
of the LORD out of Shiloh unto us, that, when it cometh among us,
it may save us out of the hand of our enemies.
What an awful character is man, void of the teachings of divine
grace! Had Israel been humbled under the mighty hand of God, and
had the elders of Israel, with prayer and supplication, consulted
the ark of God, instead of presumptuously bringing the ark out of
the sacred spot where God had appointed it to be placed, all might
have been well. But by this daring act, unauthorized of God, and as
it should almost seem, in defiance, (from the expression, wherefore
hath the Lord smitten us?) they evidently manifested that
punishment, instead of humbling, had hardened their minds. Reader!
if under divine visitations, instead of flying to Jesus, we take up
with the mere profession of the religion of Jesus, and trust in the
form of Godliness, void of the power of it; wherein do we differ
from them?LANGE, " 1 Samuel 4:3. After the return to the camp, it
is assumed as a fact in the ensuing deliberation of the elders,
that God had smitten them before the Philistines, and the cause is
discussed. The whole people here appears as a unit, which is
represented by the elders.The ark here spoken of is no other than
the Mosaic, the symbol of Gods presence with His people, the place
of His revelation to them. Cf. Exodus 25:16-22. When the Israelites
say: We will fetch the ark of the Lord out of Shiloh unto us, and
it shall come into our midst and save us from our enemies, they
assume that the Lord and the ark are inseparably connected, and
that they can obtain His help against the foe, (of which they
recognize their need), only by taking the ark along with them into
battle. They connected the expected help essentially with the
material vessel, instead of bowing in living, pure faith before the
Lord, of whose revealing presence it was only a symbol, and crying
to Him for His help. This is a heathenish feature in the religious
life of the Israelites, and shows that their faith was obscured by
superstition, there being no trace here of earnest self-examination
with the question whether the cause of the defeat might not lie in
Gods holiness and justice thus revealing itself against their sins.
Grotius therefore well remarks: It is in vain that they trust in
God, when they are not purged from their
28
-
sins.PULPIT, "1 Samuel 4:3When the people were come into the
camp. Before the battle Israel had entrenched itself, so that upon
its defeat it had a place capable of defence into which to retire.
We find also that their communications were open, so that they
could send to Shiloh. The army is called the people because battles
were not fought in those days by men specially trained, but by all
the inhabitants of the country of the proper age. The question,
Wherefore hath Jehovah smitten us? expresses surprise. The elders
had evidently expected victory, and therefore the domination of the
Philistines could not have been so complete as it certainly was in
the days of Samson. There must have been an intermediate period of
successful warfare during which Eli had been their leader. Let us
fetch the ark of the covenant of Jehovah. This, the remedy
suggested by the elders, was to employ their God as a talisman or
charm. The ark was the symbol of Jehovah's presence among them, and
of their being his especial people, and by exposing it to danger
they supposed that they would compel their God to interfere in
their behalf. They would have done right in appealing to their
covenant relation to Jehovah; and had they repented of the sins
which had grown up among them, fostered by the evil example of
Eli's sons, he would have shown them mercy. But for God to have
given Israel the victory because of the presence of his ark in
their camp would have been to overthrow all moral government, and
would have insured their spiritual ruin as inevitably as would the
granting to any order of men now the power of working miracles or
of infallibly declaring the truth.
K&D, On the return of the people to the camp, the elders
held a council of war as to the cause of the defeat they had
suffered. Why hath Jehovah smitten us to-day before the
Philistines? As they had entered upon the war by the word and
advice of Samuel, they were convinced that Jehovah had smitten
them. The question presupposes at the same time that the Israelites
felt strong enough to enter upon the war with their enemies, and
that the reason for their defeat could only be that the Lord, their
covenant God, had withdrawn His help. This was no doubt a correct
conclusion; but the means which they adopted to secure the help of
their God in continuing the war were altogether wrong. Instead of
feeling remorse and seeking the help of the Lord their God by a
sincere repentance and confession of their apostasy from Him, they
resolved to fetch the ark of the covenant out of the tabernacle at
Shiloh into the camp, with the delusive idea that God had so
inseparably bound up His gracious presence in the midst of His
people with this holy ark, which He had selected as the throne of
His gracious appearance, that He would of necessity come with it
into the camp and smite the foe. In 1Sa_4:4, the ark is called the
ark of the covenant of Jehovah of hosts, who is enthroned above the
cherubim, partly to show the reason why the people had the ark
fetched, and partly to indicate the hope which they founded upon
the presence of this sacred object. (See the commentary on
Exo_25:20-22). The remark introduced here, and the two sons of Eli
were there with the ark of the covenant of God, is not merely
intended to show who the guardians of the ark were, viz., priests
who had hitherto disgraced the sanctuary, but
29
-
also to point forward at the very outset to the result of the
measures adopted.BI, Wherefore hath the Lord smitten us today
before the Philistines?The advantages of defeatThis cry of
amazement stands between two defeats. Defeat astounded Israel: it
fell in despite of priests and religious parade. We should study
defeats. Personal and corporate both. Army cadets at Sandhurst and
Woolwich prepare to achieve victory by the study of military
failures. Good will come of such study in spite of its sadness.I.
Defeat that compels enquiry into our moral discipline is good.
1. Defeat comes as a surprise. We are in the hosts of the Great
King. We have been educated to expect victory. Our base, our
supplies, our alliances, our history, have led to this.2. We should
be grateful to the first questioner in the Church, who demands
research into the Churchs character. Wherefore? is the prelude of
Hallelujah. So, too, in the life of the soul.3. Enquiry will
demonstrate the omission of some condition essential to success. A
little later (1Sa_7:8) Samuel explains the double disaster. Our
Leader and Commander has not promised unconditional triumph. The
promises are made to character. If ye do return unto the Lord . . .
He will deliver you.4. Each day may be with us a day of battle.
II. It is no small gain when we see defeat to be the fruit of
past neglect.1. Had Israel been true long before, there would have
been no Philistines now to vex and humiliate them. At the conquest
of Canaan they had their chance. But fatigue set in, and enthusiasm
faded away before the conquest could be completed. Awed and
crippled remnants of heathen nations were left. Jebusites in Mount
Zion, Philistines on the southwest border. They were the seed of
future miseries and shames to Israel.2. To every Christian there
comes a time of special power and possibility. By laying hold on
Gods strength it would be easy then to slay our native foes, our
inbred sins. Conversion should bring us more than pardon. It should
bring the mastery of sin. Too often, the forgiven soul carries into
the Christian life sins which, though crippled, are by no means
dead. Rightly taught, we should seek their extermination.
III. It is an advantage when defeat proves the worthlessness of
superstition.1. Some sacral warrior, looking on the field with its
4,000 slain, cried, Let us fetch the Ark . . . that it may save us.
Superstition added to sin does not improve the position. Israel
called for the Ark, instead of for the God of the Ark and of the
nation.2. High regard for the Ark was natural. Read its history. It
was made on a Divine plan; and housed in the Holy of holies; it was
the resting place of the Shekinah. By grand histories it had taken
a deep place in their reverence and love. Here lay the danger. It
is easy to cling to the visible loved symbol, whilst the invisible
world of truth for which it stands is let slip. We may carry to
lifes battlefields all our religious methods, and fail in the
fight. Faith in God would have purified their hearts (Act_15:9) and
made them heroes in the fight. The historian Napier, speaking of
our army in Spain, said, Incalculable is the preponderance of moral
power in war.
30
-
Superstition may be described as moral faith lowered from the
living God to things. It is incapable of faiths valiant movements.
It has no grip of God.3. Superstition shows itself in the Christian
congregation. A modern form of it is Ecclesiolatry. The Church is
unspeakably great, sacred, and dear. And it is not difficult to set
it in the souls faith and love as a rival to God.
IV. It is a gain when defeat removes unworthy leaders. The peril
of Israel lay as much in their leaders unworthiness as in their own
vices. The nation was like a drifting ship. With men of high
character at the helm she might have recovered leeway. But of her
steersmen two were drunk with iniquity, and one lacked energy to
the point of criminality. It was necessary to get rid of these
helmsmen if the ships company was to be saved. First, Hophni and
Phinehas were slain (1Sa_4:11). Next, Eli fell. With the death of
these men a new era opensthe epoch of Samuel. Storms shake rotten
wood from living trees to make way for fresh and healthy
development.V. Though defeated, we may win on the same site ere
long. The battles were fought at Ebenezer (1Sa_4:1). Here the
armies met again soon (1Sa_7:12). Then victory sat on the banners
of Israel. It was a day of praise and monument raising. We improve
our record of deeds done when we improve our character. (1Sa_7:2;
1Sa_7:4.) Let no man lose heart. Rather let him seek victory
through repentance and faith in God alone. Defeat is not Gods
design for us. Thanks be to God which always causeth us to triumph
in Christ. (James Dunk.)
Let us fetch the ark . . . that when it cometh among us it may
save us. (Compare with 1Sa_4:10, and 1Sa_7:3.)Superstition and
religionLet us fetch the ark. What was the ark? It was a chest made
of wood. It was overlaid with pure gold, within and without, and
crowned with a mercy seat of pure gold. What was its purpose? It
was a material thing representing a spiritual idea. It was a thing
made with hands to symbolise things not made with hands, eternal in
the heavens. It was a temporality pointing to a spirituality. That
is how humanity deals with unseen presences; it makes visible
vestures for them, garments that can be touched. Here are ten
thousand men, a nations army, moving with one step, to one music,
on one mission. They are possessed by one sentiment, that of
patriotism; they are swayed by one idea, that of freedom. But these
sentiments and ideas are intangible, spiritual, unseen. The nation
must give them visibility; they must become enshrined in vestures
that can be handled and seen. So we give our army a flag, and a
flag which cam be touched represents the unseen which cannot be
couched; it represents patriotic sentiment, national enthusiasm,
the common hope. Through that flag there gleams the idea of duty
and of right. To abuse the flag is to insult the nation. The ermine
which our judges wear is the symbol of an idea. That visible robe
represents the unseen vesture of authority with which their fellow
men have clothed them. All these are visible representatives of
unseen forces and powers. Our very instinct leads us to give these
unseen presences a local and visible habitation and name. And here
was God, an unseen Power, and men hungered for some material symbol
to represent the unseen and eternal. And God said: Make an ark of
wood and gold, and it shall stand as the symbol of the meeting of
God and man, the confluence of time and eternity, the blending of
the unseen influences of heaven with the unseen aspirations of
earth. Now the character of symbols depends
31
-
upon the character of man as men become better, symbols become
enriched. As men deteriorate symbols become degraded. Is that not
so with the commonest of all symbolism which we call language?
These words which I am now addressing to you are all symbols which
I am using to represent my unseen thought. The corruption of
language follows the degradation of man. Language loses
significance; it becomes debased, and its deterioration must be
traced to its essential cause in the deterioration of man. It is
the same with other symbols besides language. They become emptied
of their royal significance when men lose their royalty. The more
high-minded is the soldier, the more illustrious is his flag; the
more debased is the soldier, the more vulgar is the flag. And so
symbols wait upon character, they can become gradually impoverished
in their meaning, until at length they become as empty as those
shells which are strewn in myriads along our shores, empty houses
which have lost their tenants, forsaken and lifeless forms. But
now, mark you, a strange foible and trick of human nature. When our
feelings and enthusiasms have deteriorated, and the symbols have
lost their life, we are prone to hug the empty shell, and we delude
ourselves into the belief that the empty symbol can do what only
could be done by its living guest. Thoroughly bad men wear a
crucifix, an empty shell, a cross without a Saviour. One of the
most notorious criminals of our time was found with a crucifix next
to his skin. Now let us realise their position. They had lost the
purity of their character, and they tried to pervert a religious
symbolism into unreligious magic. They thought that a dead symbol
would do the work of a living devotion, and that is superstition.
It would be just as reasonable for a man who was being drawn
headlong to ruin by drink to seek end save himself by putting on a
blue ribbon, a symbol of sobriety, and yet to continue to grovel in
the waste and slough of passion and lust. For bad men to send for
the ark to protect them is evidence that their religion has
degraded them into the grossest superstition. There are homes in
which Bibles are kept, not to be read, but because their presence
is supposed to surround the home with a certain sanctity and
protection. But are we not prone to use these symbols and means as
the Israelites used their ark, to obtain a sort of magical
protection from physical peril, and not deliverance from the
captivity of sin? And is not the divine purpose of prayer sometimes
forgotten, and is it not often employed as a spell to save us from
poverty and loss of danger, but not from sin? There is a short
paragraph in the life of one of the saintliest men of our time
which I will read to you, as it specially illustrates my argument.
In one of his letters, written in manhood, he writes: Once I
recollect I was taken up with nine other boys at school to be
punished, and I prayed to escape the shame. The master, previous to
flogging all the others, said to me, to the great bewilderment of
the whole school: Little boy, I excuse you, I have particular
reasons for it. That incident settled my mind for a long time; only
I doubt whether it did me any good, for prayer became a charm. I
knew I carried about a talismanwhich would save me from all harm.
It did not make me better, it simply gave me security. Will you
mark that last phrase? It did not make me better; it simply gave me
security. That was what the ark did for the Philistines; is that
all that prayer does for uscomposing our fears but not affecting
our morals, giving us a sense of security, but not delivering us
from our sin? If the exercise has been thus debased, it will betray
us when we need it most; refuge will fail us when we stand at last
in the presence of the pure and holy God. (J. H. Jowett.)
A superstitious and religious use of sacred things
(1Ch_13:14):In the first text the children of Israel say, Let us
fetch the ark of the
32
-
covenant out of Shiloh unto us. The bringing of the ark then
from Shiloh was a free and spontaneous act on their part. They had
a purpose in sending for itto save them out of the hand of their
enemies. Remembering what had been done at Jordan and at Jericho
through the instrumentality of the ark, they were satisfied that by
having it with them they would be able to triumph over their foes.
Consequently, on its being brought into the camp there was great
joy on the part of the Israelites (1Sa_4:5) and great consternation
among the Philistines (1Sa_4:6-7). The Israelites were disappointed
in their expectations, for they, instead of being victorious, were
defeated with great slaughter (1Sa_4:10-11). From the second text
we learn that the ark came into the house of Obed-edom more by
accident than anything else. He did not send for it; he did not
express a wish to have it; and he had not even the expectation of
its ever being brought into his house. These incidents, when placed
side by side, are very instructive. The Israelites sent for the
ark, and took it with them to battle, but for all that they lost
the day. Obed-edom did not send for the ark, but only received it
into his house, and the Lord blessed his family and all that he
had. To the Israelites, who sent for it, the ark became a savour of
death unto death; but to Obed-edom, who received it into his house,
the same ark became a savour of life unto life. In the one case the
ark was a snare, and in the other a blessing.I. The superstitious
use of sacred things. On the part of an irreligious man there is a
tendency, when in sore straits, to betake himself, not to God, but
to reading the Bible, or to what he calls prayer, in the hope that
by sending for the ark his difficulties will be removed. And on the
part of all there is a danger of our looking upon things sacred as
charms, and therefore of contenting ourselves with keeping the
Sabbath, reading the Bible, going to church, partaking of the
sacrament, as if some special virtue was of necessity connected
with the simple discharge of these duties. They are useful and
profitable as means, but it is only in that light that they can
profit anyone.II. The religious use of sacred things. Respecting
Obed-edom very little is known, but we are warranted in believing
that he was a good man. He reverenced the ark not for its own sake,
but as the token of Gods presence, and he was therefore blessed in
his house and all that he had. His conduct suggests the
profitableness of religion at home,
1. It is necessary to observe the word that is employed. It is
not said that he was enriched, that he was made a prosperous man,
or that he was raised above difficulties or trials. He was
blessed.2. He was blessed in his house, in his own person, in his
family, in his dependents.3. He was blessed in all that he had. He
may have had burdens, he may have had trials, but he was blessed in
his business, in his joy, in his sorrows. (P. Robertson, A. M.)
The form and spirit of religionAs is man, such must his religion
be. Now, man is a compound being. To speak correctly, man is a
spiritual being: he hath within him a soul, a substance far beyond
the bounds of matter. But man is also made up of a body as well as
a soul. He is not pure spirit, his spirit is incarnate in flesh and
blood. Now, such is our religion. The religion of God is, as to its
vitality, purely spiritualalways so; but since man is made of flesh
as well as of spirit, it seemed necessary that his religion should
have something of the outward,
33
-
external, and material, in which to embody the spiritual, or
else man would not have been able to lay hold upon it. Our
religion, then, has an outward form even to this day; for the
apostle Paul, when he spoke of professing Christians, spoke of some
who had a form of godliness, but denied the power thereof. So that
it is still true, though I confess not to the same extent as it was
in the days of Moses, that religion must have a body, that the
spiritual thing may come out palpably before our vision, and that
we may see it.I. In the first place then, the form of religion is
to be reverently observed. This ark of the covenant was with the
Jews the most sacred instrument of their religion. And, indeed,
they had great reason in the days of Samuel to reverence this ark,
for you will recollect that when Moses went to war with the
Midianites, a great slaughter of that people was occasioned by the
fact that Eleazar, the high priest, with a silver trumpet, stood in
the forefront of the battle, bearing in his hands the holy
instrument of the lawthat is, the ark; and it was by the presence
of this ark that the victory was achieved. It was by this ark, too,
that the river Jordan was dried up. And when they had landed in the
promised country, you remember it was by this ark that the walls of
Jericho fell flat to the ground. These people, therefore, thought
if they could once get the ark, it would be all right, and they
would be sure to triumph; and, while I shall have in the second
head, to insist upon it that they were wrong in superstitiously
imputing strength to the poor chest, yet the ark was to be
reverently observed, for it was the outward symbol of a high
spiritual truth, and it was never to be treated with any
indignity.
1. It is quite certain, in the first place, that the form of
religion must never be altered. You remember that this ark was made
by Moses, according to the pattern that God had given him in the
mount. Now, the outward forms of our religion, if they be correct,
are made by God. His two great ordinances of Baptism and the Lords
Supper are sent for us from on high. I dare not alter either of
them.2. And as the form must not be altered, so it must not be
despised. These Philistines despised the ark. To laugh at the
Sabbath, to despise the ordinances of Gods House, to neglect the
means of grace, to call the outward form of religion a vain
thingall this is highly offensive in the sight of God He will have
us remember that while the form is not the life, yet the form is to
be respected for the sake of the life which it contains; the body
is to be venerated for the sake of the inward soul; and, as I would
have no man maim my body, even though in maiming it he might not be
able to wound my soul, so God would have no man maim the outward
parts of religion, although it is true no man can touch the real
vitality of it.3. As the outward form is neither to be altered nor
despised, so neither is to be intruded upon by unworthy persons.
The Bethshemites had no intention whatever of dishonouring the ark
They had a vain curiosity to look within, and the sight of these
marvellous tables of stone struck them with death; for the law,
when it is not covered by the mercy seat, is death to any man, and
it was death to them. Now, you will easily remember how very solemn
a penalty is attached to any mans intruding into the outward form
of religion when he is not called to do so. Let me quote this awful
passage: He (speaking of the Lords Supper) that eateth and drinketh
unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning
the Lords body.4. And now, let me remark, that the outward things
of God are to be diligently cared for and loved.
II. Now, it is a notorious fact, that the very men who have the
least idea of what spiritual religion is are the men who pay the
most superstitious attention to outward forms. We 34
-
refer you again to this instance. These people would neither
repent, nor pray, nor seek God and his prophets; yet they sought
out this ark and trusted in it with superstitious veneration. Now,
in every country where there has been any religion at all that is
true, the great fact has come out very plainly, that the people who
dont know anything about true religion, have always been the most
careful about the forms.III. And now, in the last place, it is mine
to warn you that to trust in ceremonies is a most deceitful thing
and will end in the most terrific consequences. When these people
had got the ark into the camp, they shouted for joy, because they
thought themselves quite safe; but, alas, they met with a greater
defeat than before. Only four thousand men had been killed in the
first battle, but in the second, thirty thousand footmen of Israel
fell down dead. How vain are the hopes that men build upon their
good works, and ceremonial observances! But there is one thing I
want you to notice, and that is, that this ark not only could not
give victory to Israel, but it could not preserve the lives of the
priests themselves who carried it. This is a fetal blow to all who
trust in the forms of religion. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Regard for the Ark of GodI. Tis so natural for men to claim the
divine favour, in spite of their impieties; and when they disgrace
the sanctuary, to rely upon the outward advantages and immunities
of it. And tis to be feared the case is too much our own, to be
confident of Gods defence when we renounce Him in our lives, and to
boast of the purity of our religion when we shelter our vices under
it. Upon this calamity what counsel do the Israelites agree upon?
Is there a solemn day of humiliation appointed by them? Do they
resort to the Tabernacle of the Lord with tears and supplications?
Do they bewail their own iniquities, and those of their
forefathers? It was madness in them to presume that God would be
their champion, as long as they retained their vices.II. We know
what mighty veneration was paid to the ark by Gods express
institution; and that He gave it to His people to disting