Plate kinematics, origin and tectonic emplacement of supra-subduction ophiolites in SE Asia Manuel Pubellier a, * , Christophe Monnier b , Rene ´ Maury c , R. Tamayo d a CNRS UMR 8538, Laboratoire de Ge ´ologie, Ecole Normale Supe ´rieure, 24 rue Lhomond, F-75231 Paris, France b Laboratoire de Plane ´tologie et Ge ´odynamique, UMR-CNRS 6112, Universite ´ de Nantes, 2 rue de la Houssiniere BP 92208,44322 Nantes Cedex, France c Laboratoire de Pe ´trologie-Ge ´ochimie, Universite ´ de Bretagne Occidentale, 9, avenue Le Gorgeu, 29285, Brest, France d National Institute of Geological Sciences, College of Science, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, 1101, Philippines Available online 18 September 2004 Abstract A unique feature of the Circum Pacific orogenic belts is the occurrence of ophiolitic bodies of various sizes, most of which display petrological and geochemical characteristics typical of supra-subduction zone oceanic crust. In SE Asia, a majority of the ophiolites appear to have originated at convergent margins, and specifically in backarc or island arc settings, which evolved either along the edge of the Sunda (Eurasia) and Australian cratons, or within the Philippine Sea Plate. These ophiolites were later accreted to continental margins during the Tertiary. Because of fast relative plate velocities, tectonic regimes at the active margins of these three plates also changed rapidly. Strain partitioning associated with oblique convergence caused arc-trench systems to move further away from the locus of their accretion. We distinguish brelatively autochthonous ophiolitesQ resulting from the shortening of marginal basins such as the present-day South China Sea or the Coral Sea, and bhighly displaced ophiolitesQ developed in oblique convergent margins, where they were dismantled, transported and locally severely sheared during final docking. In peri-cratonic mobile belts (i.e. the Philippine Mobile Belt) we find a series of oceanic basins which have been slightly deformed and uplifted. Varying lithologies and geochemical compositions of tectonic units in these basins, as well as their age discrepancies, suggest important displacements along major wrench faults. We have used plate tectonic reconstructions to restore the former backarc basins and island arcs characterized by known petro- geochemical data to their original location and their former tectonic settings. Some of the ophiolites occurring in front of the Sunda plate represent supra-subduction zone basins formed along the Australian Craton margin during the Mesozoic. The Philippine Sea Basin, the Huatung basin south of Taiwan, and composite ophiolitic basements of the Philippines and Halmahera may represent remnants of such marginal basins. The portion of the Philippine Sea Plate carrying the Taiwan–Philippine arc and its composite ophiolitic/continental crustal basement might have actually originated in a different setting, closer to that of the Papua New Guinea Ophiolite, and then have been displaced rapidly as a result of shearing associated with fast oblique convergence. D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Supra-subduction ophiolite; Marginal basins; Kinematics; Oblique convergence; Sunda plate; Australia; Philippines; Cainozoic tectonics; Strain partitioning 0040-1951/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2004.04.028 * Corresponding author. Fax: +33 144322000. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Pubellier). Tectonophysics 392 (2004) 9 –36 www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto
Tectonophysics 392
Plate kinematics, origin and tectonic emplacement
of supra-subduction ophiolites in SE Asia
Manuel Pubelliera,*, Christophe Monnierb, Rene Mauryc, R. Tamayod
aCNRS UMR 8538, Laboratoire de Geologie, Ecole Normale Superieure, 24 rue Lhomond, F-75231 Paris, FrancebLaboratoire de Planetologie et Geodynamique, UMR-CNRS 6112, Universite de Nantes,
2 rue de la Houssiniere BP 92208,44322 Nantes Cedex, FrancecLaboratoire de Petrologie-Geochimie, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, 9, avenue Le Gorgeu, 29285, Brest, France
dNational Institute of Geological Sciences, College of Science, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, 1101, Philippines
Available online 18 September 2004
Abstract
A unique feature of the Circum Pacific orogenic belts is the occurrence of ophiolitic bodies of various sizes, most of which
display petrological and geochemical characteristics typical of supra-subduction zone oceanic crust. In SE Asia, a majority of
the ophiolites appear to have originated at convergent margins, and specifically in backarc or island arc settings, which evolved
either along the edge of the Sunda (Eurasia) and Australian cratons, or within the Philippine Sea Plate. These ophiolites were
later accreted to continental margins during the Tertiary. Because of fast relative plate velocities, tectonic regimes at the active
margins of these three plates also changed rapidly. Strain partitioning associated with oblique convergence caused arc-trench
systems to move further away from the locus of their accretion. We distinguish brelatively autochthonous ophiolitesQ resultingfrom the shortening of marginal basins such as the present-day South China Sea or the Coral Sea, and bhighly displaced
ophiolitesQ developed in oblique convergent margins, where they were dismantled, transported and locally severely sheared
during final docking. In peri-cratonic mobile belts (i.e. the Philippine Mobile Belt) we find a series of oceanic basins which
have been slightly deformed and uplifted. Varying lithologies and geochemical compositions of tectonic units in these basins, as
well as their age discrepancies, suggest important displacements along major wrench faults.
We have used plate tectonic reconstructions to restore the former backarc basins and island arcs characterized by known petro-
geochemical data to their original location and their former tectonic settings. Some of the ophiolites occurring in front of the Sunda
plate represent supra-subduction zone basins formed along the Australian Craton margin during theMesozoic. The Philippine Sea
Basin, the Huatung basin south of Taiwan, and composite ophiolitic basements of the Philippines and Halmahera may represent
remnants of such marginal basins. The portion of the Philippine Sea Plate carrying the Taiwan–Philippine arc and its composite
ophiolitic/continental crustal basement might have actually originated in a different setting, closer to that of the Papua NewGuinea
Ophiolite, and then have been displaced rapidly as a result of shearing associated with fast oblique convergence.
M. Pubellier et al. / Tectonophysics 392 (2004) 9–36 13
Palawan Block (P.B), (2) extended continental crust of
the NW Sulu Sea, (3) Cagayan volcanic arc, (4) Sulu
Sea backarc basin, (5) western edge of Mindanao and
the Sulu arc, characterized by continental basement,
(6) Celebes basin floored with oceanic crust and (7)
northern arm of Sulawesi, partly underlain by
continental basement (Taylor and Hayes, 1980;
Rangin et al., 1989a,b, 1990a,b; Pubellier et al.,
1992). The effect of the oblique collision on this
system has been the development of a mosaic of
crustal blocks, which may in fact have been derived
(Faure et al., 1989; Rangin et al., 1990a,b) from two
major plates: the Eurasian and the Philippine Sea
Plates. The fault-bounded blocks correspond to some
of the exotic terranes recognized by Karig (1983) and
McCabe and Almasco (1985).
Marginal basins have opened along the Eurasian
margin since the Early Tertiary, most of them trending
NS or NNW/SSE. The mechanics of basin opening
has always been a matter of discussion. It has been
proposed, for example, that the South China Sea
(SCS) opened in response to the extrusion of Indo-
china (Tapponnier et al., 1986). This interpretation is
difficult to reconcile, however, with a N–S spreading
of the South China Sea and with the timing of rifting
that started in the Late Cretaceous (Pigott and Ru,
1994). More likely, gravity controlled trench-pull may
be invoked to explain the rifting and spreading of the
South China Sea basin. The subduction along the
Sunda Trench (Fig. 3) may be responsible for the
opening of the Proto South China and the Celebes
Seas, and the subduction of the Proto South China Sea
south of Palawan may in turn explain the South China
Sea opening (Rangin, 1989; Rangin et al., 1990a,b).
Nearly all the marginal basins have opened
diachronously in the eastern half of the Sunda/
southern China blocks. The first one was the Proto
South China Sea, the rifting of which started at the
edge of the Yienshanian orogen in the Late Creta-
ceous with limited sea floor spreading (if any) during
the Early Eocene. Other smaller basins such as the
Beibu basin and the Palawan Trough which opened on
either side of the South China Sea during the
Paleogene did not reach the oceanic stage (Rangin
et al., 1990b; Fig. 3). The Celebes Sea opened during
the Middle Eocene (47 Ma, Weissel, 1980; Silver et
al., 1989), followed by the opening of the South China
Sea during the Oligocene (33–15 Ma, Taylor and
Hayes, 1980; Briais et al., 1988) and of the Sulu Sea
during late Early Miocene (18 Ma, Rangin, 1989).
The opening of these basins is interpreted to have
occurred analogous to that of the western South China
Sea, where a propagator has been identified, mapped
and modelled (Huchon et al., 2000). We assume a
similar evolution for the Makassar Basin as a
propagator of the Celebes Sea (Rangin et al.,
1990a,b). We also infer an identical process for the
Proto South China Sea narrow section of the Sulu Sea,
now shortened in Sabah.
The process of opening of the Sunda basins was
not terminated completely with the collision of the
Australian continental fragments in the Miocene.
After the jump of the Sunda subduction zone to its
present position (Fig. 3), the extension of the upper
plate further in the south produced two basins: the
North Banda basin during the Late Miocene and the
south Banda basin during the Pliocene (Honthaas et
al., 1998; Hinshberger et al., 2001).
Fig. 2. Theoretical section of a supra-subduction environment with typical multi-element plots of chondrite-normalized rare-earth elements and extended element patterns of selected
COB backarc basin basalts and peridotites. Examples are extracted from Eastern Indonesia (Monnier et al., 1995, 1999, 2000, 2003).
M.Pubellier
etal./Tecto
nophysics
392(2004)9–36
14
Fig. 3. Simplified map showing various continental blocks (thin crosshatched pattern) and basins of the Sunda, Australia and Philippine Sea
(PSP) plates. Thick lines characterize selected and simplified segments of major faults. Thicker dashed lines with saw teeth marks indicate the
former locations of major trenches Sunda Trench south of Sunda, and Melanesian Trench north of Australia are assumed hereafter to be
responsible for the stretching of the upper plates and subsequent opening of marginal basins floored with oceanic crust. Arrows represent an
approximate direction of opening. Same legend as Fig. 1 for the geographic names; additional basins on this figure are: BB: Beibu basin, Cel:
Celebes Basin, Mam: Mamberramo Basin, Mk: Makassar Basin, NBb: North Banda Basin, NGB: New Guinea Basins (disappeared), PSCS:
Proto South China Sea (disappeared), PT: Palawan Trough, TaiM: Thailand/Malay basins, SBb: South Banda Basin, Tet: Tethysian-affinity
rocks could have originated in the Banda Sea because
of abundant peridotite outcrops on Ambon island,
located southward. Based on a P–T path model inferred
from the study of plagioclase-bearing peridotites,
Linthout and Helmers (1994) concluded that this
Fig. 8. Paleogeographic reconstruction of the basins north of Australia: (A) the Mesozoic basin during the Eocene, prior to the obduction of its floor on the Australian shelf (CRO,
Central Range Ophiolite; modified from Pubellier et al., 2003a). (B) The Late Eocene–Oligocene basins Mamberramo/Solomon before the Mid Miocene.
M.Pubellier
etal./Tecto
nophysics
392(2004)9–36
25
M. Pubellier et al. / Tectonophysics 392 (2004) 9–3626
ophiolite formed by rifting of the Ber-Seram micro-
continent from Australian during Early to Middle
Miocene (40K/40Ar on high-Mg tholeiites: 20–9 Ma
and BABB: 19–15 Ma; Monnier et al., 2003), Its
emplacement onto Seram would have occurred
between 9.5 and 7 Ma (Linthout and Helmers, 1994;
Linthout et al., 1997).
Ultramafic rocks from Seram island (central
Indonesia) include weakly depleted peridotites (pla-
gioclase-bearing lherzolites) that represent a piece of
subcontinental mantle, which was partly melted and
metasomatised prior to its re-equilibration in the
plagioclase field and during its ascent associated
with a continental rifting episode (Monnier et al.,
2003). The associated high-Mg calc-alkaline tholei-
ites were likely generated within a mantle wedge
with a high geothermal gradient during early stages
of subduction. These high-Mg tholeiites have strong
backarc basin basalt (BABB) chemical affinities
(regarding the high rare-earth ratios (e.g. La/Nb
and Th/Nb).
Ophiolite formation had probably initiated along a
transform margin. Subsequent oblique convergence
along this transform fault zone resulted in the
subduction of some oceanic lithosphere under Seram
during the Early Miocene and in the formation of a
volcanic arc. The injection of the gabbros and
websterites into the peridotites and their uplift and
exhumation may be related to the splitting of this arc
ca. 13 Ma. We therefore consider that the ophiolites of
the Seram region actually represent the northern
margin of Australia. They may have been connected
with the Oligocene–Early Miocene Mamberramo
Basin of Irian Jaya (Monnier et al., 2003; Fig. 8B)
and the Oligocene–Early Miocene Sepik basin (Davies
and Jacques, 1984).
5. Highly displaced ophiolites
Ophiolites are ubiquitous in the Mobile Belt of the
Philippines. They are generally exposed in complex
tectonic settings involving large Neogene or Recent
faults. Almost all the ophiolites of the Philippine Arc
have supra-subduction affinities (Hawkins and Evans,
1983; Yumul et al., 1997; Tamayo, 2001). Similarly, at
the opposite end of the Mobile Belt, in New Guinea,
ophiolite bodies display petrological and geochemical
characteristics of arc, forearc and backarc settings
(Monnier et al., 1999, 2000).
Since the Early Neogene, convergence among
the Philippine Sea, Indo–Australia and Eurasia
Plates has led to arc collision and the subsequent
incorporation of buoyant arc fragments onto Papua
New Guinea (starting possibly in the Early Mio-
cene) and the northern Philippines (Late Miocene).
Arc transfer is taking place today in the southern
Philippines, east of Mindanao, where the Philippine
trench is propagating southwards, decoupling the
arc from the Philippine Sea Plate (Pubellier et al.,
1999a,b). This process may occur in Taiwan within
the next 5–10 million years, when convergence
between the overthrusting western tip of the
Philippine Sea Plate and southeast China switches
to a subduction zone, linking the Philippine and
Ryukyu Trenches. However, prior to its amalgama-
tion with Sundaland, the Philippine Arc ended its
activity before Middle Oligocene and underwent
severe deformation (Rangin et al., 1990a,b; Billedo,
1994).
5.1. The Tertiary Cyclops Ophiolite of New Guinea
The Cyclops Ophiolite occurs along the northern
coast of Papua New Guinea in Irian Jaya (Monnier et
al., 2000) where it is thrust over high pressure–high
temperature mafic rocks.
It contains all of the components of a typical
ophiolitic sequence: residual mantle peridotites
(harzburgites and dunites), cumulate gabbros, doler-
ites, basalts with N-MORB composition and minor
amounts of boninitic lavas. The geochemical signa-
tures (Figs. 2 and 8) of the basalt samples (arc,
backarc) suggest that the Cyclops ophiolite in Irian
Jaya formed in a supra-subduction environment.
Some of the samples (ultramafic rocks and boninites)
likely formed in a fore-arc environment during the
Middle Eocene (Monnier et al., 1999). All these
series were overthrust during the Early Oligocene by
a backarc basin crust representing the main ophiolitic
series including gabbros, dolerites and lavas. The
geochemical data show that gabbros and basalts are
co-genetic. These associated basalts and related
cumulate rocks display major- and trace-element
contents with flat patterns and Nb-negative anoma-
lies together with moderate enrichment in LILE (Ba,
Fig. 9. Possible extension of the Huatung Basin on Luzon Island
(hatched pattern). Faults on Luzon Island are from Loevenbruck e
al. (2002). Ophiolitic bodies are as follows: Zamb: Zambales, Ang
Angat, Isa: Isabella, Chico: Chico River, Pal: Palaui Island, Laoag
Laoag ophiolite, CC: Central Cordillera.
M. Pubellier et al. / Tectonophysics 392 (2004) 9–36 27
Rb, Th) indicative of convergent margin settings
(Fig. 2). Mineral chemistry and the bulk rock REE
abundances of the peridotites are characteristic of
highly residual mantle rocks. The high Cr number of
spinel and very low HREE concentrations of
peridotites are in agreement with residues of 20–
35% melting as expected of peridotites from supra-
subduction zone environments (Monnier et al.,
1999).
5.2. Northern Philippines and the Huatung Basin:
pieces of relatively undeformed backarc basin crust
The Philippine region has a complex and
composite basement that contains numerous ophio-
lite complexes, most of which have a supra
subduction origin (Mitchell et al., 1986; Geary et
al., 1988; Yumul et al., 1997; Tamayo, 2001;
Tamayo et al., in press). The ophiolitic gabbros
likely crystallized from basaltic liquids originated
from mantle sources that underwent high degrees of
partial melting and/or several episodes of melting.
Low to high degrees of partial melting are also
deduced from the mantle peridotites (Tamayo et al.,
in press).
There are discrepancies in age and nature of the
ophiolite present in the northern Philippines. The
Eocene Zambales ophiolite (Fig. 1, insert 1) has
been probably carried over a large distance because
it cannot be correlated with any of the neighbouring
basins, and it has been thrust over relicts of
continental basement present along the coast. The
ophiolite occurrences in NE Luzon, although not all
dated, are assumed to be slightly older (Cretaceous,
Billedo, 1994). From the eastern coast of Luzon, the
peridotites and metamorphics of the Sierra Madre
dip gently toward the west beneath the sediments of
the Cagayan Basin. Subsurface data show that there
is little deformation in the basin except one reverse
fault, which corresponds to a transverse ridge. The
Central Cordillera is separated from the Cagayan
basin by a series of enechelon reverse and strike-slip
faults, and it only shows basement at the bottom of
deeply incised valleys. When basement can be
reached, it is composed of well-preserved and
weakly deformed dykes, pillows and cherts. The
best exposures of such rock types are in Chico
River in the Central cordillera (Figs. 1 and 9).
Similar observations can be made in the ophiolites
of the Angat Massif (Tamayo, 2001). The geo-
chemical signature of the ophiolites of the Sierra
Madre, at least in its southern part (Isabella Massif),
indicates a MORB affinity (Tamayo, 2001). These
ophiolites differ from those of the Zambales Massif,
which is typical of an arc and backarc basin
basement (Hawkins and Evans, 1983).
North of Luzon, the basement of the Philippine
arc, is probably simpler (Fig. 9). Bathymetry and
free air gravity suggest that the Miocene volcanic
arc lies directly on a relatively homogenous base-
ment. It is possible that the missing basement of the
arc is actually the southern part of the Middle
Cretaceous Huatung Basin, whose northern part is
known from magnetic anomalies (though poorly
identified), and from dredging west of the Gagua
ridge (Deschamps et al., 2000). There is no
t
:
:
M. Pubellier et al. / Tectonophysics 392 (2004) 9–3628
complete ophiolite reported in Taiwan, other than
large ophiolitic blocks engulfed in the Lichi
Melange (Liou and Ernst, 1979).
As a preliminary conclusion, we propose that the
northern part of the Philippine Mobile belt is
composed of a series of basin floors, which have
been slightly deformed and uplifted. Mass wasting
from this mobile belt filled the intra arc basins such
as the Central Valley of Luzon (Late Oligocene to
Early Miocene Klondyke Formation). Their varying
lithologies, geochemical compositions and age
discrepancies suggest large-scale displacements
along major wrench faults, which have been
reactivated as reverse or thrust faults during
subsequent shortening.
5.3. The Halmahera-Molucca Region ophiolites
Halmahera, together with Waigeo and Obi, as well
as other smaller islands are composed of ophiolitic
complexes covered by Upper Cretaceous and Eocene
forearc sediments (Ballantyne and Hall, 1990; Bal-
lantyne, 1991, 1992; Hall et al., 1991; Baker and
Malaihollo, 1996). Ophiolitic rocks are intruded by
94–72 Ma (40Ar/39Ar) diorites. These units, which are
now part of the Philippine Sea Plate, have supra-
subduction zone chemical signatures (with domi-
nantly arc, boninitic and rare seamount origin), and
their generation requires a high degree of partial
mantle melting (Ballantyne, 1991). In Waigeo, an
ultramafic basement exists (Charlton et al., 1991), but
it is not dated nor analysed. These ultramafic rocks,
assumed firstly to be Late Mesozoic in age, are
covered by Paleogene forearc sediments, and chert
floats bear Early Eocene radiolarian assemblages
(Ling et al., 1991). We cannot rule out the possibility
that this ophiolitic basement is similar to that of
Morotai island (Hall et al., 1991), and probably to the
submerged Snellius Plateau (Pubellier et al., 2000).
The polygenic characteristics of the basement on these
islands resemble that of the present-day Mariana
forearc.
Ophiolitic rocks are also exposed as small bodies,
as well as blocks in melanges, in Talaud islands
(Moore et al., 1981) They constitute the present
forearc basement of the Sangihe arc that was
obducted by the Early or Middle Miocene prior to
the deposition of the overlying forearc sediments
(Bader and Pubellier, 2000), probably as a fragment
of the former Molucca/Celebes crust. The ophiolitic
chain continues in Central Mindanao as disrupted
alignment of small massifs and melanges (Pubellier
et al., 1996a,b, 1999a; Tamayo, 2001) and may
connect with the ophiolites present in western Panay
island (Fig. 1, insert 2).
6. Conclusions
It can be inferred from observations of active
processes that rapid plate convergence is the most
efficient way of generating basins floored with
oceanic crust. The major cause for the dismantlement
of ophiolitic bodies is the oblique convergence, which
causes decoupling of the convergence vector above a
subduction zone (Fich, 1972; Jarrard, 1986; McCaf-
frey, 1992). Three basic ideas account for the
distribution of the Mesozoic and Cainozoic ophiolites
in SE Asia.
1. The closure of Tethyan-derived basins trapped
during the India–Australia convergence (Fig. 1).
Related ophiolites are represented by the Indus-
Tsang Po Suture zone ophiolites in the Hima-
layas, the Naga ophiolite in northern Myanmar,
ophiolites of the Andaman islands, ophiolites
associated with the Woyla Group in Sumatra and
the Meratus and the Central/SE Sulawesi ophio-
lites jammed between Borneo and the Gondwa-
nian blocks in the Southern Sunda region (e.g.
Sumba Block; Rangin et al., 1990a,b). Traces of
suture zone ophiolites associated with the end of
the subduction beneath the Yenshanian Arc are
also scattered along the stretched margin of the
Sunda Block in NW and NE Borneo, Palawan
and part of southeastern China.
2. Basins developed at the edges of continental
plates (marginal basins sensu stricto) were
opened to the south of the Eurasian plate (Fig.
10). They are namely the Proto-South China
Sea (Paleocene), the Celebes-Makassar and
possibly the Molucca Sea basins (Eocene), the
South China Sea (Mid-Oligocene to Mid-Mio-
cene), and the Sulu Sea (Mid-Miocene). In
addition to the opening of these basins, a
variety of aborted basins opened, such as the
Fig. 10. Schematic figure illustrating how the Sunda and Australian continental margins are stretched by the convergence, creating the
brelatively autochthonous basins and ophiolitesQ. The Philippine Sea Plate is not depicted.
M. Pubellier et al. / Tectonophysics 392 (2004) 9–36 29