-
f 4o
sthaankf
XenotimeUPb dating
in tepollema
inerals
trate U, but exclude Pb on crystallising, making them amenable
to precise altered, or even completely dissolved, during subsequent
uidrock in-
whole grains in a wideGerdes and Zeh, 2009;, 1975; Mezger andZeh
et al., 2010). Con-of zircon andxenotime
Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Lith
.e l1992; Spear and Pyle, 2002). Zircon grains, for example, can
grow inmelts during high-grade metamorphic and magmatic events
(Blacket al., 1986; Vavra et al., 1999), in aqueous uids during
amphibolite-
ages requires detailed information about the relative and
absolutetiming of zircon and xenotime formation, in a textural
context.
In arenaceous rocks, detrital zircon grains commonly form a
minorHowever, interpretation of age data may be complicated because
zirconand xenotime in single rocks can form in more than one
geologicalevent (Black et al., 1986; Gerdes and Zeh, 2009), and can
be affected bydifferent styles of alteration after their formation
(Geisler et al., 2001,2003a, 2003b, 2007; Gerdes and Zeh, 2009;
Hoskin, 2005; Pidgeon,
loss of radiogenic Pb from local domains or fromrange of
geological settings (Geisler et al., 2001;Hay and Dempster, 2009;
Krogh and DavisKrogstad, 1997; Pidgeon, 1992; Vavra et al.,
1999;sidering such complexities, proper interpretationdating. Both
minerals have high-closure temperatures for the UThPbsystem, N900 C
for zircon (Cherniak and Watson, 2001; Lee et al.,1997), and
similar (N900 C) for xenotime (Cherniak, 2006; Liu et al.,2011);
hence, their ages are likely to record the time zircon and
xenotimecrystallised during magmatic, metamorphic and hydrothermal
events.
teraction, and newly re-precipitated undermetamorphic conditions
be-tween 250 and 650 C (Dempster et al., 2004;Hay andDempster,
2009;Rasmussen, 2005; Wilke et al., 2012; Zeh et al., 2010).
Alteration, eitherrelated to leaching ofmetamict zircon domains,
local recrystallisation, orcoupled dissolutionreprecipitation
processes, can lead to partial or totalfacies metamorphism (Zeh et
al., 2010; Zeh anding low-grade metamorphic hydrothermal e
Corresponding author.E-mail address:
[email protected] (A.R
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2014.10.0110024-4937/ 2014
Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.processes, as well as fore. Both
minerals concen-
in sedimentary rocks (Cabella et al., 2001; Cabral et al.,
2012a; Suzukiand Adachi, 1991). Furthermore, zircon and xenotime
can be partiallymatic, metamorphic and even hydrothermalthe
characterisation of sedimentary provenancGold-lode depositPassagem
de MarianaMinas Gerais
1. Introduction
Zircon and xenotime are valuable mzircon-age resetting during
the Brasiliano orogeny at ca. 500Ma. This interpretation is
supported by UPb datingof euhedral xenotime immediately adjacent to
altered zircon within the same tourmaline pocket. The
xenotimegrains give a Concordia age of 496.3 2.0 Ma, which is
identical to that determined for monazite of a quartzhematite
vein-type deposit (i.e., jacutinga lode) in the region (Itabira),
another important mineralisation styleof gold. The occurrence of
relatively abundant inherited detrital zircon, but absence of rock
fragments in the tour-maline pocket investigated here, implies that
detrital material was completely replaced by tourmaline.
Thegraphite overprint on the altered detrital zircon attests to a
reducing uid, which was likely formed by uidrock interaction with
carbonaceous phyllite of the Batatal Formation, the host rock of
the Passagem lode.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
for UPb dating of mag-
2004; Hoskin and Schaltegger, 2003; Yeats et al., 1996).
Xenotimeforms across a range of metamorphic conditions (Heinrich et
al., 1997;Pyle et al., 2001), and also occurs as an authigenic and
detrital mineralKeywords:Zircon
detrital zircon of the footwall quartzite of the N2.65-Ga-old
Moeda Formation. Discordant analyses point toAvailable online 29
October 2014 inductively coupled plasmaDetrital zircon without
detritus: a result ointeraction during the gold-lode
formationGerais, Brazil
Alexandre Raphael Cabral a,, Armin Zeh b
a Mineral Deposits, Technische Universitt Clausthal,
Adolph-Roemer-Strasse 2A, D-38678 Claub Institute of Geosciences,
Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe Universitt, Altenhferallee 1, D-60438 Fr
a b s t r a c ta r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:Received 31 July 2014Accepted 20 October
2014
Zircon and xenotime occurMariana, a world-class gold dexhibiting
porous domains
j ourna l homepage: wwwGerdes, 2014), and dur-vents (Dempster et
al.,
. Cabral).96-Ma-old uidrockf Passagem, Minas
l-Zellerfeld, Germanyurt am Main, Germany
ourmaline-rich hydrothermal pockets in the auriferous lode of
Passagem desit. Zircon grains show pristine oscillatory zoning, but
many of them are altered,d with graphite. UraniumPb dating of
zircon, using in-situ laser ablationss spectrometry, yields ages
between 3.2 and 2.65 Ga, which match those for
os
sev ie r .com/ locate / l i thoscomponent (mostly b1 vol.%)
compared to the abundance of detritalquartz (N95 vol.%). These
relationships, however, can be obscured byinteraction of such rocks
with hydrothermal uids, as demonstratedin this study. In this
context, the following questions arise: can detritalzircon survive
where detrital quartz and other clastic material are
-
quantitatively dissolved and/or replaced during pervasive
uidrockinteraction in a hydrothermal quartz lode? Can zircon and
xenotime ina such setting still provide information about their
provenance, or dothey reect the timing of hydrothermal lode
formation only? Can zirconand xenotime grains provide information
that is useful to understand
416 A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015)
415427physico-chemical processes during the formation of
hydrothermalgold-lode deposits?
The present study addresses such questions by considering
thegold-lode deposit of Passagem de Mariana, Quadriltero Ferrfero
(QF)of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Passagem represents a historically
importantworld-class gold-lode deposit with a long-lasting, but
still unresolved,debate on its genesis. Ladeira (1988)
categorically dened Passagemas an enigmatic deposit. Genetic
classications for Passagem vary froman originally intrusion-related
deposit (Hussak, 1898; cf. Derby, 1911),through a syngenetic model
(Cavalcanti and Xavier, 2006; Fleischerand Routhier, 1973), to a
number of epigenetic models (Cabral andKoglin, 2012; Chauvet et
al., 2001; Garda et al., 2010; Guimares,1970; Vial et al., 2007). A
peculiarity of the Passagem lode is the abun-dance of tourmaline, a
feature that has traditionally been referred toas carvoeira (von
Eschwege, 1832). Passagem can be regarded as thetype locality of
carvoeira-style mineralisation in Minas Gerais. Twodifferent
timings for the carvoeira-style mineralisation of Passagemhave been
proposed: one Minas, also referred to as Transamazonian(2.12.0 Ga,
Schrank and Machado, 1996; Vial et al., 2007), the otherBrasiliano
(~0.6 Ga, Chauvet et al., 1994, 2001).
Uncertainty about the genesis of the Passagem lode and its gold
(atleast 60 metric tonnes produced from the end of the 17th century
until1954 [Vial et al., 2007]) stems in part from the lack of a
robust age forthe Passagem quartztourmaline vein deposit. In order
to close thisknowledge gap, we present new results of in-situ UPb
dating carriedout on well characterised zircon and xenotime grains
found in atourmaline-rich pocket of the Passagem lode. Our combined
petrographi-cal and geochronological data sets not only shed new
light on the timingof formation of the Passagem lode, but also
provide detailed informationabout the behaviour of zircon and
xenotime during hydrothermalprocesses that led to the formation of
carvoeira-style mineralisation.
2. Geological setting and Passagem de Mariana
The gold-lode deposit of Passagem de Mariana is located inthe
Mariana anticline, at the southernmost end of the platiniferousAuPd
belt of Minas Gerais, which is delineated by thrust faults(Fig. 1).
The limbs of the Mariana anticline are thrust faults that de-formed
metasedimentary rocks during the ~0.6-Ga Brasiliano
orogeny,resulting in a prominent tectonic foliation (Chauvet et
al., 1994). Alongthe anticline limbs ore deposits are zonally
distributed following aredox gradient along the ground, from
sulphate- and hematite-bearingzones to a sulphide-rich zone (Cabral
et al., 2013b). Passagem is withinthe sulphide zone, immediately
below an itabirite unit (Vial et al., 2007).
Itabirite is the characteristic rock of the Cau Itabirite of the
ItabiraGroup,Minas Supergroup (Dorr, 1969). The term itabirite,
originally de-scribed by von Eschwege (1822) and widely used in
Brazil, denesmetamorphosed banded iron formation containing
hematite and/ormagnetite. The itabirite unit, referred to as the
Itabira iron formation(Harder and Chamberlin, 1915), was deposited
at 2.65 Ga (Fig. 2;Cabral et al., 2012b). The itabiritic rocks
grade upwards to dolomiticrocks of the Gandarela Formation, the
upper unit of the Itabira Group(Dorr, 1969). The auriferous
sulphidetourmalinecarbonatequartzlodes of Passagem are located
beneath the Itabira Group, in a thrustzone encompassing rocks of
the Caraa Group, mostly of quartzite
Fig. 1. Location of the Passagem gold-lode deposit in the
southern part of the platiniferousAuPd belt of Minas Gerais (Cabral
et al., 2009, and references therein). The belt followsthe roughly
NS-trending trace of the ~0.6-Ga Brasiliano thrust faults, along
whichlode deposits and platiniferous alluvia occur. Abbreviations:
C. = Crrego (stream);
Faz. = Fazenda (farm); Fm. = Formation; Gr. = Group; Sg. =
Supergroup.
-
(i.e., the Moeda Formation at the base), followed by pelitic
rocks(i.e., the Batatal Formation), locally carbonaceous, that are
transitionalto the Cau Itabirite. Detrital zircon ages for the
Moeda Formation atPassagem are between 3097 44 and 2606 47 Ma
(Machado et al.,1996). Quartzitic rocks of the Moeda Formation and
pelitic rocks ofthe Batatal Formation are locally interngered
(where not obliteratedby tectonic overprint). The Caraa
Groupunconformably overlies green-stone rocks of the Archaean Rio
das Velhas Supergroup (Dorr, 1969).The supracrustal sequences of
the Rio das Velhas Supergroup and theMinas Supergroup represent
structural keels that are delimited bygneissic domes (Marshak et
al., 1992).
Regional metamorphism in the Mariana anticline is within
thetremoliteanthophyllite zone of Pires (1995), corresponding to
upper-greenschist- and lower-amphibolite-facies conditions for the
countryrocks of the Passagem deposit (Vial et al., 2007). At
Passagem, Chauvetet al. (2001) estimated pressures between ~7 and
10 kbar, andtemperatures around 500 C. We note that Hussak (1898)
foundandalusite totally replaced by muscovite. The nding of
earlierandalusite at Passagem is at odds with the aforementioned
pressureestimates, attesting to the superposition of two
metamorphic events:one is the Minas orogeny, which produced
andalusite elsewhere in theQuadriltero Ferrfero in response to the
ascent of gneissic domes(Marshak et al., 1992); the other is the
Brasiliano orogeny, to whichthe metamorphic conditions estimated
for Passagem are attributed(Chauvet et al., 2001).
The Passagem gold-lode deposit occurs within a tabular
thrust-faultzone involving rocks of the Caraa Group underneath the
CauItabirite (Chauvet et al., 2001; Vial et al., 2007), in
agreement with theitabirite hanging wall and quartzite footwall
depicted in earlier works(Ferrand, 1894; Hussak, 1898). The country
rocks exhibit prominenttectonic foliation of ductile character.
Graphitic phyllite (Fleischer andRouthier, 1973), also known as
graphitesericite phyllite (Vial et al.,
thrust-fault zone. Within this zone, the lode deposit consists
ofvoluminous quartz, carbonate and tourmaline-rich pockets.
Tourmalineconcentrations that are parallel to the foliation are
termed tourmalinite;it occurs along the contact between
quartzcarbonate lodes and thewallrock, dening a salband or
selvedge, or as boudins in banded dolo-mite (Fig. 3A). Tourmaline
pockets refer to tourmaline concentrationswithin the
quartzcarbonate lodes (Fig. 3A). The lodes truncate the tec-tonic
foliation of the country rocks, which is ascribed to the
Brasilianoorogeny (Chauvet et al., 1994).
Themost abundant oremineral is arsenopyrite; some pyrrhotite
andpyrite are present. Gold and a AuBiSbTe mineral assemblage
arecommonly observed within microfractures cross-cutting the
sulphideminerals (Chauvet et al., 2001; Hussak, 1898; Oberthr and
Weiser,2008; Vial et al., 2007). It is important to point out that
the richestgold contents were found along the contact with
hematite-bearingitabirite and within graphitesericite phyllite
(Vial et al., 2007).
3. Samples and methods
3.1. Samples
Three samples rich in tourmaline were collected in the
Fundoorebody at level 120 (see Fig. 6 of Vial et al., 2007, for
geological crosssections of the Fundo orebody). The footwall of the
Fundo orebodyat level 120 is quartzite of the Moeda Formation. The
quartzcarbonatelode at level 120 encloses tourmaline pockets, some
0.3 m in thickness.The hangingwall is banded dolomite of the
Batatal Formation (Fig. 3A).Imbrications of sericite phyllite occur
along the thrust-fault zone inwhich the lodes are located (Fig.
3B).
Sample L120a is a tourmaline pocket with interstitial
calcite(Fig. 3C). Sample L120b comprises vein quartz and
tourmaline-bearingsericite phyllite, a fragment of the wallrock.
The contact between the
of thski e
417A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 4154272007),
typies the Batatal Formation of the Caraa Group in the tabular
Fig. 2. Schematic lithostratigraphic column inwhich the
CaraaGroup and the ItabiraGroupet al. (2012b) on the Cau Itabirite
(UPb zircon age from a metavolcanic layer) and Babinlikely reects
changes in the Pb abundance during diagenesis.vein quartz and the
phyllite is marked by a 12-mm-thick selvedge
eMinas Supergroup are emphasised (Cabral et al., 2013b). Age
constraints are fromCabralt al. (1995) on the Gandarela Formation.
The 2.42-Ga age is a whole-rock PbPb age that
-
418 A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427of
coarse-grained tourmaline, along which arsenopyrite and pyriteoccur
in the phyllite. Sample L120c is a tourmalinequartz
pocket.UraniumThPb-isotope analyses were carried out on a thin
section ofsample L120a. This hand-specimen sample is representative
of thetourmaline-rich pockets that are commonly found in the
quartzcarbonate lodes of Passagem (Chauvet et al., 2001; Fleischer
andRouthier, 1973; Hussak, 1898; Vial et al., 2007).
Fig. 3. A. Schematic representation of main features of
auriferous tourmalinecarbonatequartz lode at level 120, Passagem
deMarianamine. The lode is located between quartziteof the Moeda
Formation and banded dolomite of the Batatal Formation. B.
Photograph,looking300, of a quartz lode rich in tourmaline (Tur)
pockets at level 120. Sericite phylliteof the Batatal Formation
occurs here as wallrock. C. Reected-light photomicrograph of
atourmaline pocket from level 120 (sample L120a). Tourmaline (Tur)
crystals, withoutany preferential orientation, have their
interstices lled with calcite (Cal). Arrow pointsto a zircon grain
(Zrn; see Fig. 4A for a BSE image).3.2. Methods
3.2.1. Petrography and geochemistryPolished thin sectionswere
instrumental for recognising zircon- and
phosphate-likeminerals under both transmitted and reected light.
Theminerals were conrmed as zircon and xenotime by means of
energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) using a Cameca SX100 electron
micro-probe at the Technische Universitt Clausthal.
Backscattered-electron(BSE) images of zircon and xenotime were
obtained in high-gainmode in order to identify growth zoning.
Part of the slab remaining aftermaking the thin
sectionwasmanual-ly ground in an agatemortar. The rock powderwas
submitted for chem-ical analysis to Acme Analytical Laboratories
(Vancouver) Ltd., Canada.Trace elements were determined by
inductively coupled plasmamassspectrometry (ICPMS), following
Li-metaborate/tetraborate fusionand nitric-acid digestion. The same
fusiondigestion procedure wasintegrated with ICPoptical emission
spectrometry (ICPOES) formajor oxides and Sc. Total C and S were
obtained by Leco. Loss onignition (LOI)was quantied bymass
difference after ignition at 1000 C.
3.2.2. In-situ analyses for UThPb isotopesAnalyses for U, Th and
Pb isotopes in zircon and xenotime were per-
formed with a ThermoScientic Element 2, sector eld
(SF)ICPMS,coupled to a Resolution M-50 (Resonetics) 193-nm ArF
Excimer lasersystem (ComPexPro 102F, Coherent) at the
Goethe-Universitt Frank-furt. Measurements were resolved over time,
in peak-jumping, pulse-counting analogue mode over 465 mass scans,
with 19-s sampleablation preceded by 21-s background measurement.
Laser-spot sizewas 15 m for xenotime, 15 to 23 m for zircon, 33 m
for the zircon ref-erence materials: GJ1 zircon (primary
reference), Pleovice zircon andOG1 zircon; and 15 m for the
referencemonazite Moacir. No xenotimereference material was
available. The sample surface, a polished thinsection, was cleaned
before each analysis by three pre-ablation pulses.Ablation was
carried out in a He stream of 0.63 l min1, which wasmixed
immediately after the ablation cell with 0.012 l min1 N2 and0.85 l
min1 Ar prior to introduction into the Ar plasma of the SFICPMS.
All gaseswere virtually atN99.999%purity andnohomogeniserwas used
during gas mixing to prevent signal smoothing. Signals weretuned
for maximum sensitivity for Pb and U whilst keeping oxide
pro-duction, monitored as 254UO/238U, below 0.6%. The sensitivity
achievedwas about 9300 cps/g g1 for 238U with 33-m spot size, at
5.5 Hz andlaser energy of approximately 3 Jcm2. The two-volume
ablation cell(Laurin Technic, Australia) of theM-50 enables
detection and sequentialsampling of heterogeneous grains (e.g.,
growth zones) during time-resolved data acquisition, due to its
quick response time of b1 s (timeuntil maximum signal strength was
achieved) and wash-out (b99.9%of previous signal) time of about 2
s. With a depth penetration of~0.7 m s1 and integration time of
0.46 s (4 mass scans = 0.46 s=1integration), any signicant
variation of 207Pb/206Pb and 238U/206Pb inthe m scale is
detectable. Raw data were corrected ofine for back-ground signal,
common Pb, laser-induced elemental fractionation,instrumental mass
discrimination and time-dependent elemental frac-tionation of Pb/U,
using an in-houseMS Excel spreadsheet programme(Gerdes and Zeh,
2006, 2009). The common-Pb correction used theinterference- and
background-corrected 204Pb signal and a model Pbcomposition (Stacey
and Kramers, 1975). The 204Pb content for eachratio was estimated
by subtracting the averagemass-204 signal, obtain-ed during the
21-s baseline acquisition,whichmostly results from 204Hgin the
carrier gas (about 220 cps), from the mass-204 signal of the
re-spective ratio. For the sample material, the calculated contents
of com-mon 206Pbwere generally b0.3% of the total 206Pb, but in
very rare casesup to 3.8%. Laser-induced elemental fractionation
and instrumentalmass discrimination were corrected by normalisation
to the referencezircon GJ-1 (Jackson et al., 2004). Prior to this
normalisation, the inter-elemental fractionation (206Pb*/238U)
during the 19-s ablation of
the sample material was corrected for each individual analysis.
The
-
correction was done by applying a linear regression through
allmeasured, common-Pb-corrected ratios, excluding the outliers
(2standard deviation; 2), and using the intercept with the y-axis
asthe initial ratio. The total offset of the measured
drift-corrected206Pb*/238U ratio from the true IDTIMS value (0.0983
0.0004; iso-tope dilutionthermal ionisationmass spectrometry,
IDTIMS, obtainedat the Goethe-Universitt Frankfurt) of the
reference GJ-1 grain wasabout 15% (during the analytical session),
with approximately 3% driftover the day.
Reported uncertainties (2) of the 206Pb/238U ratiowere
propagatedby quadratic addition of the external reproducibility (2)
that wasobtained from the reference zircon GJ-1 (see Appendix 1)
and thewithin-run precision of each analysis (2 SE; standard
error). In thecase of 207Pb/206Pb, we used a 207Pb-signal-dependent
uncertaintypropagation (see Gerdes and Zeh, 2009). The 207Pb/235U
ratio is derivedfrom thenormalised and error-propagated
207Pb/206Pb* and 206Pb*/238Uratios, assuming a natural abundance
ratio 238U/235U of 137.88, and
the uncertainty derived by quadratic addition of the
propagateduncertainties of both ratios. The accuracy of the method
was veriedby analyses of reference zircon Pleovice (338.2 1.7 Ma)
and OG1(3469.8 8.9 Ma), and the reference monazite Moacir (506.3
2.5 Ma) see Appendix 1. These ages are, within error, identical
tothe quoted TIMS values of 337.13 0.37 Ma (Slma et al.,
2008),3465.4 0.6 Ma (Stern et al., 2009), and 504.3 0.2 Ma
(Gasquetet al., 2010), respectively. The data were plotted using
the softwareISOPLOT (Ludwig, 2001).
4. Results
4.1. Petrography
Zircon and xenotime, illustrated in Figs. 4 and 5, are
frequentlyobserved in the tourmaline-rich pocket sampled from a
sulphidetourmalinequartz vein at Passagem. Indeed, both minerals,
which
normB. Zocallmin
419A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427Fig. 4. BSE
images of tourmaline pocket of the Passagem lode. The imageswere
taken underin zircon (Zrn) and xenotime (Xtm). A. Zircon between
tourmaline (Tur) and calcite (Cal).Altered, sponge-like zircon
grain with pores lled with graphite (Gr). Note that graphite
lmatrix. F. Euhedral xenotime grains with growth zoning contain
inclusions of a Th-silicateal (left column) and high-gain
conditions (right column); the latter shows growth zoningircon
grain (indicated in A) with an inherited core and an irregular new
overgrowth. CD.y replaces tourmaline. E. Grains of zircon and
xenotime (rectangle) in tourmalinecalciteeral (bright spots).
-
420 A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427occur well
distributed within the rock, had already been identied byHussak
(1898). The tourmaline-rich pocket is made up essentially
oftourmaline and interstitial calcite. The calcite also occurs as
veinletscross-cutting coarse-grained tourmaline (sample L120a).
Zircon grains are mostly found in the interstices of
coarse-grainedtourmaline (Fig. 4A). They have elongations between
10 and 110 m.Many zircon grains are rounded and contain primary
domains withrelic oscillatory zoning in BSE images (Figs. 4B, 5A).
A few primary grainsshow irregular overgrowths (Fig. 4B). Other
grains are surrounded and/ortransected by porous domains, resulting
in sponge-like aggregates(Fig. 4D). Some of the porous domains seem
to have coalesced to formfractures that truncate the oscillatory
zoning of the host zircon (Fig. 5A).The pores are commonly lled
with graphite (Fig. 4C), which makessome grains appear black under
the transmitted-light microscope. Somesulphide (pyrite) is locally
intergrown with graphite (Fig. 5F).
Xenotime is generally euhedral and most grains occur in
intersticeslled with calcite (Fig. 4E). Rarely, xenotime is in
direct contact with
Fig. 5.A. High-gain BSE image of zircon in tourmaline-rich
pocket of the Passagem lode. The gromode) of euhedral xenotime with
UTh-silicate inclusion (arrowed), in contact with altered zigrains
of tourmaline. CF. X-raymappingof B for ZrL (C), YL (D), CK (E)
andSK (F). Note this spatially associated.graphite-bearing zircon
(Fig. 5B). In contrast to zircon, xenotime re-mains impervious to
graphite (neither inclusions in, nor encrustationson, xenotime)
(Fig. 5B). Some xenotime grains show angular growthzoning and tiny
inclusions (b3 m across) of a Th-silicate mineral(either thorite or
cofnite) (Fig. 4F). A few larger crystals of xenotimeenclose
tourmaline grains (Fig. 5B).
No grains of detrital quartz were found in sample L120a despite
thepresence of quartzite of theMoeda Formation as the immediate
footwallof the lode at level 120 (Fundo orebody). Some relics of
detritalmaterial might be rounded quartz and K-aluminosilicate
inclusions intourmaline from sample L120b (Fig. 6A, B), also
containing zirconwith relic oscillatory zoning (Fig. 6C).
4.2. Whole-rock chemical analyses
The contents of Al2O3 and Na2O are between 19.7 and 26.8 wt.%,
and~1.0 wt.%, respectively, reecting the large amounts of
tourmaline, the
wth zoning of zircon is truncated by graphite-lled pores and
cracks. B. BSE image (normalrcon and graphite (black) in
tourmalinecalcite matrix. The xenotime crystal encloses twoat
graphite is concentrated only in the vicinity of the altered
zircon, some sulphide (pyrite)
-
main aluminosilicate of the lode samples (samples 120a, 120b
and120c,Table 1). The SiO2 contents (34.864.1 wt.%) inversely vary
with Al2O3;the highest SiO2 value being the sample with quartz as
the preponder-ant mineral. The carbonate component is expressed in
the contents ofCaO (1.69.3 wt.%), loss on ignition (LOI, 3.59.4
wt.%) and total C(0.42.0 wt.%). The K2O amounts are small (0.020.08
wt.%), withNa2O/K2O ratios between 13 and 68.
The relative abundance of zircon over xenotime is in good
agree-ment with the high Zr content of 296 ppm, compared to 20 ppm
Y, ob-tained from the whole rock of sample L120a (Table 1). The
tourmalinepockets have ratios of Zr/Hf = 3641 and Y/Ho = 2535,
which arewithin the charge-and-radius-controlled (CHARAC) eld of
Bau
reference shale PAASthat is, Post-Archaean Australian Shale
(Fig. 7):a light-REE pattern sharply falling from La to Sm, and a
relatively atpattern from Eu to Lu. Sample L120c shows an abrupt
rising from Tm
tourmaline pockets that occur within the Passagem lode. The
zircongrains have Th/U ratios between 0.39 and 3.0, which are
typical of mag-
Fig. 6. BSE images of sample L120b, illustrating inclusions of
rounded quartz (Qz) in tourmaline (A), and
K-aluminosilicatematerial (K-Al.Si) within tourmaline (B) in the
vicinity of zirconwith relic oscillatory zoning (C, high-gain
image).
421A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427(1996). The
CHARAC eld indicates that the ZrHf and YHo pairs didnot
fractionate, having retained their chondritic ratios.
Chondrite-normalised rare-earth-element (REE) patterns are similar
to the
Table 1Whole-rock chemical analyses of tourmaline pockets from
the Passagem lode.
L120a L120b L120c L120a L120b L120c
SiO2 (wt.%) 34.84 48.36 64.10 Pb 0.5 1.1 0.7Al2O3 26.82 24.08
19.69 Rb 0.9 b0.1 2.1Fe2O3 5.40 10.60 3.95 Sb 0.9 16 1.1MgO 6.23
5.68 4.29 Se b0.5 0.8 b0.5CaO 9.30 1.55 2.76 Sc 16 15 12Na2O 1.34
1.35 1.00 Sn 15 11 12K2O 0.03 0.02 0.08 Sr 193 192 117TiO2 0.52
0.59 0.37 Ta b0.1 0.4 b0.1
P2O5 b0.01 0.11 0.09 Th 9.4 10 1.1MnO 0.11 0.02 0.04 Tl b0.1
b0.1 b0.1Cr2O3 0.044 0.025 0.048 U 2.2 2.1 1.1LOI 9.4 7.5 3.5 V 155
153 114Sum 94.03 99.89 99.92 W 0.7 4.8 1.5Total C 1.97 0.43 0.51 Zn
b1 2 b1Total S 0.13 1.53 0.06 Zr 296 98 157Ag (ppm) b0.1 0.1 0.1 Y
20.3 14.1 4.6As 1523 N10,000 1144Au (ppb) 24 1917 3 La 16.3 20.9
2.8Ba (ppm) 3 2 9 Ce 27.8 38.3 4.2Bi b0.1 1.5 b0.1 Pr 3.17 4.09
0.48Be b1 1 b1 Nd 11.6 15.0 2.0Cd b0.1 b0.1 b0.1 Sm 2.02 2.55
0.38Co 1.7 46 1.5 Eu 0.68 0.76 0.20Cs b0.1 b0.1 b0.1 Gd 2.27 2.78
0.63Cu 5.5 16 114 Tb 0.40 0.43 0.11Ga 32 26 21 Dy 2.73 2.60 0.72Hf
8.1 2.4 4.2 Ho 0.69 0.56 0.13Hg 0.04 0.03 b0.01 Er 2.22 1.33 0.45Mo
1.6 1.0 2.7 Tm 0.31 0.21 0.06Nb b0.1 2.1 0.3 Yb 2.08 1.34 0.62Ni
8.0 114 6.1 Lu 0.32 0.20 0.11matic zircon (Hoskin and Schaltegger,
2003). Xenotimehas similar Th/Uratios (between 0.11 and 1.55), but
its U contents are higher(434013026 ppm) than those of zircon
(1602944 ppm). Seven spotanalyses on zircon yielded concordant UPb
ages of 3.18, 2.86, 2.80and 2.67 Ga (level of concordance between
98102%), whereas allother analyses are discordant (Fig. 8A, B).
Most of the discordantto Lu. No obvious Eu anomaly is observed.
Fig. 7 also shows the Batatalphyllite from guas Claras, an iron-ore
deposit near Belo Horizonte,about 70 km NW of Passagem (Spier et
al., 2007). The overall patternof the reference Batatal phyllite
resembles those of the tourmalinepockets. It is worth mentioning
that one sample (L120b), which is richin arsenopyrite, has 1.9 ppm
Au and 1.5 ppm Bi.
4.3. UraniumPb ages
During this study 52 UPb spot analyses were carried out on 39
zir-con grains, and 14 spot analyses on 8 xenotime grains (Table
2), all donein situ on a thin section of sample L120a, which is
representative of theFig. 7. Chondrite-normalised REEY patterns for
tourmaline pockets from the Passagemlode. Reference shale, PAAS
(Post-Archaean Australian Shale), is shown for comparison.Sample
L120b (grey) is rich in arsenopyrite and has 2 ppm Au. Samples
L120a andL120c are barren and poor in arsenopyrite. Values for C1
and PAAS are respectively fromMcDonough and Sun (1995), and
McLennan (1989); those for the Batatal phyllite arefrom Spier et
al. (2007).
-
Table 2Results of in-situ analyses for UThPb by LASFICPMS of
zircon and xenotime from a tourmaline pocket of the Passagem lode
(sample L120a).
Grainnumber
Analysisnumber
207Pba
(cps)Ub
(ppm)Pbb
(ppm)Thb
U
206Pbcc
(%)
206Pbd238U
2(%)
207Pbd235U
2(%)
207Pbd206Pb
2(%)
rhoe 206Pb238U
2(Ma)
207Pb235U
2(Ma)
207Pb206Pb
2(Ma)
Concf
(%)
Zirconzr1 a08 31,627 1624 300 0.90 0.26 0.1647 2.1 3.409 2.6
0.1501 1.6 0.80 983 19 1506 21 2347 27 42zr2 a09 4800 1125 120 1.55
b.d. 0.1008 2.5 1.311 3.5 0.0943 2.5 0.70 619 15 850 21 1515 48
41zr3 a10 35,024 894 230 0.69 0.01 0.2136 2.3 4.783 2.7 0.1624 1.5
0.84 1248 26 1782 23 2481 25 50zr4 a12 22,991 384 200 0.76 0.61
0.4634 2.0 11.35 2.6 0.1777 1.6 0.80 2455 42 2553 24 2631 26 93zr5
a14 20,107 1104 350 1.15 0.42 0.2938 2.2 6.630 2.8 0.1637 1.7 0.79
1660 33 2063 25 2494 29 67zr6c a15 54,673 1013 400 0.88 0.01 0.3464
1.6 8.216 1.8 0.1720 0.8 0.88 1917 26 2255 16 2578 14 74zr7 a16
35,986 555 290 0.82 0.16 0.4346 1.5 10.45 1.8 0.1744 1.0 0.83 2326
30 2476 17 2600 17 89zr8 a17 37,811 809 220 1.00 0.20 0.2191 1.8
5.240 2.2 0.1734 1.3 0.81 1277 20 1859 19 2591 21 49zr9 a18 77,717
2850 760 0.88 1.90 0.2290 2.1 4.652 2.7 0.1474 1.7 0.77 1329 25
1759 23 2316 29 57zr10near xno101 a19 66,082 2104 620 1.11 1.29
0.2348 3.7 4.697 3.9 0.1451 1.1 0.96 1359 46 1767 33 2289 18 59zr11
a20 9878 926 85 1.06 1.16 0.0829 2.9 1.421 12.3 0.1244 11.9 0.23
513 14 898 76 2020 211 25zr12 a23 20,638 214 140 0.72 b.d. 0.5319
1.8 15.33 2.5 0.2090 1.8 0.72 2749 41 2836 24 2898 28 95zr12 a24
35,911 160 100 0.54 0.16 0.5529 1.8 15.53 2.1 0.2038 1.1 0.87 2837
42 2849 20 2857 17 99zr12 a25 60,575 515 200 0.50 0.15 0.3281 1.4
8.578 1.6 0.1896 0.8 0.88 1829 23 2294 15 2739 13 67zr13 a26 39,935
541 280 0.60 0.09 0.4406 1.6 10.92 1.8 0.1797 1.0 0.85 2353 31 2516
17 2650 16 89zr14 a41 47,878 2051 480 1.50 0.82 0.1824 1.8 4.126
2.2 0.1640 1.3 0.81 1080 18 1659 19 2498 22 43zr14 a42 42,173 1394
340 1.26 1.11 0.1784 1.9 3.766 2.2 0.1531 1.2 0.84 1058 18 1585 18
2381 21 44zr15 a43 55,378 725 310 0.39 0.07 0.3780 1.8 10.26 2.2
0.1969 1.2 0.83 2067 32 2459 20 2801 20 74zr16 a47 66,779 958 250
1.11 0.26 0.2244 1.9 5.559 2.1 0.1797 0.9 0.91 1305 23 1910 18 2650
15 49zr17 a48 45,095 1885 330 1.38 0.29 0.1500 1.9 3.338 2.1 0.1614
1.0 0.89 901 16 1490 17 2471 17 36zr17 a49 36,370 1579 270 1.18
2.70 0.1451 2.4 3.053 3.6 0.1527 2.7 0.65 873 19 1421 28 2376 47
37zr18 (graphite rim) a50 18,593 2944 190 0.70 3.82 0.0584 2.4
0.5919 6.8 0.0735 6.3 0.35 366 8 472 26 1028 128 36zr19 a51 45,376
1323 390 1.35 0.24 0.2716 3.0 6.676 3.3 0.1783 1.4 0.91 1549 42
2069 30 2637 23 59zr20 a52 30,013 393 230 1.07 0.28 0.4633 1.9
11.27 2.3 0.1764 1.3 0.82 2454 38 2545 21 2619 22 94zr20 a53 21,533
283 150 0.87 0.34 0.4330 3.2 10.46 3.7 0.1752 1.9 0.86 2319 62 2476
35 2608 31 89zr21 a54 34,634 2614 600 1.83 1.03 0.1962 1.7 3.999
3.0 0.1478 2.5 0.56 1155 18 1634 25 2321 43 50zr22 a55 23,975 260
170 1.95 0.15 0.4226 2.3 12.04 2.7 0.2066 1.3 0.87 2272 44 2607 25
2879 21 79zr23 a56 57,971 1106 440 0.53 0.70 0.3529 1.7 7.531 1.9
0.1548 0.9 0.88 1948 29 2177 17 2399 15 81zr24core a57 82,460 622
470 0.56 0.05 0.6366 1.4 21.88 1.5 0.2492 0.7 0.90 3176 35 3178 15
3180 11 100zr24core a58 77,340 812 340 0.48 0.27 0.3371 2.2 11.07
2.3 0.2383 0.8 0.94 1873 35 2529 22 3108 13 60zr24rim a59 22,461
1800 370 1.30 0.25 0.1992 3.1 4.005 4.4 0.1458 3.1 0.71 1171 33
1635 36 2297 53 51zr25 a61 30,192 746 250 1.12 0.04 0.2752 5.6
6.553 5.9 0.1727 1.6 0.96 1567 79 2053 53 2584 26 61zr25 a62 22,631
245 170 1.32 0.21 0.5143 1.8 13.04 2.5 0.1840 1.8 0.71 2675 40 2683
24 2689 29 99zr26 a63 30,888 1928 290 0.82 0.51 0.1392 2.3 2.763
2.7 0.1439 1.5 0.85 840 18 1346 20 2275 25 37zr27 a64 26,227 341
210 1.36 0.09 0.4947 1.6 12.43 2.1 0.1822 1.3 0.79 2591 35 2637 20
2673 21 97zr27 a65 30,593 350 230 1.14 0.58 0.5164 2.0 13.13 2.2
0.1844 1.0 0.89 2684 44 2689 21 2693 17 100zr27 a66 23,410 262 180
1.22 0.36 0.5138 1.9 12.89 2.3 0.1819 1.2 0.84 2673 42 2671 22 2670
20 100zr28 a68 57,581 858 590 1.47 0.13 0.5366 3.3 14.56 4.0 0.1968
2.2 0.83 2769 76 2787 39 2800 36 99zr29 a81 38,395 2883 290 1.07
1.22 0.0857 1.9 1.660 2.7 0.1406 1.8 0.73 530 10 994 17 2234 31
24zr30 a82 39,480 2045 180 0.53 0.26 0.0759 5.0 1.676 5.2 0.1601
1.4 0.96 472 23 999 34 2457 24 19zr31 a84 53,443 1131 440 0.66 0.34
0.3292 1.9 7.133 2.2 0.1571 1.1 0.87 1835 30 2128 20 2425 19 76zr32
a85 34,596 413 240 0.59 b.d. 0.5129 1.8 12.81 2.0 0.1812 0.9 0.89
2669 38 2666 19 2664 15 100zr33core a86 26,594 481 260 2.31 b.d.
0.3481 1.8 8.179 2.2 0.1704 1.3 0.82 1925 30 2251 20 2562 22
75zr33rim a87 31,968 740 400 3.03 0.23 0.3479 2.0 7.834 2.4 0.1633
1.4 0.81 1924 33 2212 22 2491 24 77zr34 a88 8464 635 93 0.86 b.d.
0.1356 2.7 2.528 3.2 0.1352 1.6 0.86 820 21 1280 23 2167 28
38zr35core a89 56,442 816 450 0.72 b.d. 0.4628 2.1 10.64 2.2 0.1668
0.7 0.95 2452 43 2493 21 2526 12 97zr35rim a90 42,950 850 440 1.07
b.d. 0.4654 3.0 10.73 3.3 0.1672 1.3 0.91 2463 62 2500 31 2529 23
97zr36 a91 33,860 1238 570 1.50 2.14 0.4087 3.0 14.39 4.0 0.2554
2.7 0.75 2209 57 2776 39 3218 42 69zr37 a92 42,451 2477 670 0.93
b.d. 0.2556 3.5 5.272 4.6 0.1496 3.1 0.75 1467 46 1864 40 2341 53
63zr38 a93 37,950 881 290 1.29 0.24 0.2690 3.3 5.911 3.4 0.1593 1.0
0.95 1536 45 1963 30 2449 17 63zr38 a94 37,956 2287 260 0.87 b.d.
0.0939 6.1 2.152 6.1 0.1662 0.8 0.99 579 34 1166 43 2520 14 23zr39
a95 21,500 180 120 1.13 0.31 0.5310 1.7 17.20 2.2 0.2350 1.4 0.76
2746 37 2946 21 3086 23 89
Xenotimexno1 a96 28,339 7510 580 0.33 0.12 0.0784 1.3 0.6188 1.5
0.0573 0.7 0.88 486 6 489 6 502 16 97xno2 a97 19,585 5045 450 1.05
0.41 0.0766 1.4 0.6050 1.7 0.0573 1.0 0.81 476 6 480 7 503 22
94xno3 a98 19,994 4450 440 1.55 0.41 0.0811 1.5 0.6402 2.5 0.0573
2.0 0.60 503 7 502 10 502 44 100xno4 a99 39,581 13,026 1000 0.28
0.11 0.0791 1.5 0.6232 1.9 0.0572 1.2 0.77 491 7 492 7 498 27
99xno4 a100 21,196 5749 440 0.28 0.03 0.0793 1.4 0.6281 1.8 0.0575
1.2 0.77 492 7 495 7 510 26 96xno5 a101 14,661 4341 330 0.28 0.11
0.0797 1.9 0.6244 3.4 0.0569 2.9 0.55 494 9 493 14 486 64 102xno6
a102 23,355 5688 430 0.17 0.12 0.0796 1.5 0.6271 2.0 0.0571 1.4
0.73 494 7 494 8 497 30 99xno6 a103 14,849 3713 300 0.45 0.60
0.0797 1.5 0.6277 4.1 0.0571 3.9 0.36 495 7 495 16 495 85 100xno6
a104 38,310 7165 570 0.27 0.03 0.0809 1.8 0.6392 2.0 0.0573 0.9
0.89 501 9 502 8 504 20 100xno6 a105 25,954 6978 540 0.22 0.06
0.0806 1.5 0.6345 1.8 0.0571 1.1 0.80 500 7 499 7 495 24 101xno7
a106 23,225 6073 460 0.11 b.d. 0.0807 1.3 0.6365 1.9 0.0572 1.4
0.68 500 6 500 8 501 31 100xno7 a107 25,519 6730 540 0.34 0.29
0.0807 1.4 0.6363 1.9 0.0572 1.2 0.77 500 7 500 7 500 26 100xno8
a111 15,461 4560 400 0.96 0.27 0.0782 1.5 0.6181 2.1 0.0573 1.5
0.70 486 7 489 8 503 33 97xno8 a112 34,607 8651 770 0.73 1.58
0.0807 1.5 0.6419 3.1 0.0577 2.7 0.48 500 7 503 12 518 59 97
422 A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427
-
analyses plot along and below a reference line, having an
upper-inter-cept age of 2670 Ma, and a lower-intercept age of 500
Ma (Fig. 8B, lineIVB). This line respectively joins the volcanism
during the depositionof the Itabira iron formation and the
Brasiliano orogeny. Only a fewanal-yses plot above this line. Two
of them (grain zrc35), at 97%-concordancelevel, gave 207Pb/206Pb
ages of about 2530 Ma (Fig. 8B, Table 2), whichrepresent some
resetting, possibly during the Minas orogeny. Twelveout of the 14
analyses of xenotime resulted in a Concordia age of496.3 2.0 Ma,
which is identical (within analytical uncertainties)to an
upper-intercept-207Pb/206Pb age of 500.7 9.3 Ma including
zircon-age resetting at ~500Ma is very likely, but Pb loss from
zircon
Notes to Table 2:a Within-run background-corrected mean 207Pb
signal in cps (counts per second).b Uranium and Pb content and Th/U
ratio were calculated relative to GJ-1 reference zircon.c
Percentage of common Pb on 206Pb. b.d. = below detection limitd
Corrected for background,within-run Pb/U fractionation (in case of
206Pb/238U) and commonP
GJ-1 (IDTIMS value/measured value); 207Pb/235U calculated using
207Pb/206Pb/(238U/206Pb*1/137e Rho is the
206Pb/238U/207Pb/235U-error-correlation coefcient.f Degree of
concordance = 206Pb/238U age/207Pb/206Pb age 100
Fig. 8. A. Probabilitydensity diagram showing concordant ages
for zircon from a tourma-line pocket of the Passagem lode (sample
L120a). BC. Concordia diagramswith results ofUPb dating for zircon
(B) and xenotime (C) from sample L120a. In B, Discordia-likelines
are reference lines for zircon grains that formed during volcanism
coevalwith the de-position of the Itabira iron formation, but
affected by Pb loss during the Minas andBrasiliano events.
423A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427could also
have happened prior to the xenotime formation. A Minas
busing themodel Pb composition of Stacey andKramers (1975),
subsequently normalised to.88)all analyses (Fig. 8C).
5. Discussion
5.1. Timing of zircon and xenotime formation
Results of UPb-age dating indicate that all zircon grains inthe
investigated tourmaline-rich pocket are inherited from
ametasedimentary precursor rock, most likely quartzite of the
MoedaFormation and/or phyllite of the Batatal Formation (see
below).This conclusion is supported by the fact: (1) that theMoeda
quartziteat the footwall of the sampling site of this study (Fundo
orebody,level 120) contains abundant detrital zircon grains, the
ages ofwhich are between 3097 44 and 2606 47 Ma (Machado et
al.,1996); (2) that detrital grains of zircon with ages of 3.2,
2.85, and2.67 Ga, as found in our sample, have been reported from
Moedametasediments elsewhere in the Quadriltero Ferrfero
(Hartmannet al., 2006; Koglin et al., 2014).
The zircon grains show evidence of dissolution. The zircon
dissolu-tion is recorded by sponge-like zircon crystals, having
pores lled withgraphite (Figs. 4C, 5BF), as well as by uid-widened
fracturestransecting zircon crystals that partly preserve
oscillatory zoning(Fig. 5A). Limited new zircon re-precipitation is
revealed by a few irreg-ular zircon overgrowths (Fig. 4B), but they
were too thin to be dated bythe LAICPMS technique. The observed
overgrowth microstructuresare similar to those described for zircon
in greenschist-facies Scottishslate (Hay and Dempster, 2009), for
zircon in staurolite schist fromthe Shackleton Range, Antarctica
(Zeh et al., 2010), and for zirconfrom tourmaline-bearing
metavolcanic rock within itabirite of theItabira iron formation
(Cabral et al., 2012b).
In order to evaluate the absolute timing of detrital zircon
leachingand xenotime formation, one should consider that xenotime
in sampleL120a is generally euhedral, and that some grains occur in
direct contactwith sponge-like zircon (Fig. 5B). This could
indicate that xenotimewasstable and formed during zircon
alteration, perhaps by taking up the Yreleased from zircon, in a
way similar to that suggested by Hay andDempster (2009) for the
formation of epitaxial xenotime overgrowthsaround porous zircon in
Scottish slate rocks. However, no zirconwith a xenotime overgrowth
has been observed in the presentstudy. The UPb results reveal that
all xenotime grains formed at496.3 2.0 Ma, whereas many zircon
grains underwent signicantPb loss at ~500 Ma (Fig. 8B, C). This
link between xenotime age and
-
424 A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015)
415427(Transamazonian) overprint (Pb loss) might indeed have
affectedsome detrital grains of zircon in sample L120a (i.e., all
grains thatplot above the reference line IVB in Fig. 8B, explaining
the 2530-Ma age). The more signicant Pb-loss event, however, took
place at~500 Ma.
The Concordia age obtained for the xenotime grains is slightly
olderthan the ArAr age of 485 4 Ma for vein muscovite at
Passagem(Chauvet et al., 2001), which is hitherto the only well
documentedage for Passagem. The 485-Ma age should represent
cooling, followingthe formation of the xenotime at 496 Ma. Schrank
and Machado(1996) reported upper-intercept ages between 1.8 and 2.1
Ga for mon-azite concentrates from Passagem, ages that are broadly
compatiblewith the Minas orogeny. Because it is not possible to
retrieve the dataobtained by Schrank and Machado (not given in
their extendedabstract), their monazite ages are not further
considered here. In sum-mary, thin-section observations and
geochronological data indicatethat the auriferous lode of Passagem
formed during a late stage of theBrasiliano event at 496.3 2.0 Ma.
This interpretation is in agreementwith the cross-cutting
relationships in which the veins truncate theprominent tectonic
foliation generated during the Brasiliano orogeny(Chauvet et al.,
1994).
5.2. Protolith nature and uidrock interaction
If the zircon grains were inherited from the Moeda quartzitic
rocks(see above), where is the quartz detritus?
Two explanations to account for the lack of detrital quartz
canbe proposed or, possibly, a combination of both. One explanation
isthat detrital quartz from quartzitic rocks of the Moeda
Formationwas completely dissolved and/or replaced in the
hydrothermal vein,leaving zircon as residual grains. The other
explanation is that theprotolithwas a quartz-poor pelitic rock such
as phyllite from the BatatalFormation.
Some rounded quartz and K-aluminosilicate occur as inclusionsin
tourmaline of sample L120b (Fig. 6A, B). The rounded quartzgrains
could represent relics that survived the coupled
(quartzite)dissolution(tourmaline) precipitation process. On the
other hand, therelic K-aluminosilicate could indicate that the
precursor rockwas a peliticrock. Therefore, these pieces of
evidence cannot distinguish between aquartzite protolith and a
shale-like protolith.
The graphite in the pores of leached sponge-like grains of
zircon(Figs. 4C, 5BF) gives support for uid interactionwith
carbonaceousphyllite of the Batatal Formation, or even for uid
sourced directlyfrom the Batatal Formation (cf. Fleischer and
Routhier, 1973). In ad-dition, the similarity between the
C1-normalised REE patterns forthe tourmaline pockets and those of
the reference shale PAAS, andthe Batatal phyllite (Fig. 7),
suggests that uids interacted withshale-like rocks of the Batatal
Formation. The crustal signature ofthe shale is also reected in the
Co/Ni ratios of tourmaline andcoexisting arsenopyrite (Cabral and
Koglin, 2012), as well as in theratios Zr/Hf (3641) and Y/Ho (2535)
for the tourmaline pockets(this study, samples L120a, b and c),
which fall in the CHARAC eldof Bau (1996). This eld indicates that
the ZrHf and YHo pairsretained their chondritic ratios, that is,
they were not decoupledduring the hydrothermal processes that led
to the formation of thePassagem lode.
It is pertinent to point out that a pelitic protolith for
thetourmaline-rich pockets in the Passagem lode does not
excludequartz replacement from a quartzite protolith. In fact,
replacementof quartz by tourmaline to form tourmalinite layers in
host quartzitein Minas Gerais has been recorded at Crrego Bom
Sucesso, about200 km north of Passagem (Fig. 1; see Cabral et al.,
2011). Althoughthe protolith nature of the tourmaline-rich pockets
of the sampleset cannot precisely be determined, intense
tourmalinisation led topartial dissolution of detrital zircon. In
this regard, the recognition
of abundant detrital zircon in hydrothermal quartz veins
elsewherecan reveal a new facet of uidrock interaction (i.e., uid
capableof obliterating otherwise unrecognised detrital material).
In thiscontext, it is important to note that detrital zircon can
effectively bedissolved and transported in ZrNaSiH2O-bearing
hydrothermal so-lutions, where Zr forms NaZr-silicate-hydroxide
complexes (Wilkeet al., 2012). That this can happen is well
documented in Zeh et al.(2010). However, Zr solubility and,
therefore, zircon dissolution areconsiderably suppressed if Al is
added to the system ZrNaSiH2O, asshown by the experiments of Wilke
et al. (2012). By taking this into ac-count, the preservation of
abundant detrital zircon in sample L120a isperhaps directly related
to the tourmalinisation process, which requiresuids containing
relatively high concentrations of soluble Al, in additionto Na, Si
and H2O.
5.3. Gold rush to Minas Gerais
The importance of the gold rush to the highlands of the region
thatbecame known as Minas Gerais is symbolised by Ouro Preto,
aUNESCO world-heritage site. Two major components of the
alluvialgold that triggered the gold rush were derived from the
carvoeira-style mineralisation, the type locality of which is
Passagem, and thejacutinga-style mineralisation, where the
so-called ouro preto (blackgold) occurs (Galbiatti et al., 2009;
Hussak, 1904; von Eschwege,1832). Jacutinga is a local denomination
for AuPdPt-bearing veins ofabundant specular hematite, hosted in
itabiritic rocks (Cabral et al.,2009; Hussak, 1904). The only
robust UPb age for the jacutinga-stylemineralisation, based on
monazite recovered at Itabira (Fig. 1; Cabralet al., in press), is
496 2 Ma, which is the same age as determinedhere for xenotime at
Passagem. Therefore, the regional mineralisingevent responsible for
the gold-rush gold took place in the Late Cambri-an. Our xenotime
age is indistinguishable within error from the age ob-tained by
direct dating of gold, 515 55 Ma, from a quartzhematite-lode
deposit in Diamantina (Cabral et al., 2013a), in the
northernmostpart of the approximately 240-km-longbelt betweenOuro
Preto andDi-amantina (Fig. 1). The common age for quartzsulphide
lodes(Passagem) and quartzhematite lodes (Itabira) corroborates the
ideaof a common origin for uids that interacted with different
rocks at dif-ferent redox conditions (Boiron et al., 1999; Cabral
et al., 2013b).
6. Conclusion
For the rst time, the age of the Passagem gold-lode deposit,
aworld-class and historically important deposit of controversial
origin,is precisely determined at 496.3 2.0 Ma by UPb dating of
veinxenotime. In contrast, all zircon grains within the
hydrothermal veinare of detrital origin (N2.65 Ga), having only
been altered partially at~500 Ma. The abundance of detrital zircon,
with ages similar to thosefrom the Moeda metasediments, and the
lack of detrital material indi-cate hitherto unrecognised aspects
of the Passagem system: (1) hydro-thermal uids were capable of
obliterating detrital material (quartziteof the Moeda Formation
and/or phyllite of the Batatal Formation), leav-ing abundant
detrital zircon as residuum; (2) the zircon grains provideonly
limited information about the timing of the hydrothermal
over-print; (3) graphite precipitation during hydrothermal
alteration of zir-con attests to uidrock interaction with a
carbonaceous rock, likelyphyllite of the Batatal Formation; (4)
xenotime is useful to place a pre-cise age constraint on the timing
of the hydrothermal overprint.
Acknowledgements
ARC gratefully acknowledges the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft(DFG, project CA 737/1-1) for nancing his
stay at the TechnischeUniversitt Clausthal, Germany. Reviews by F.
Corfu and an anonymousreferee considerably improved the manuscript
and are greatly appreci-ated. The manuscript also beneted from
further reviewing by F. Corfu
and meticulous comments by A. J. R. White.
-
(cps) (ppm) (ppm) (%) (%)bd
(%) (%) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (%)U 238U 235U 206Pb 238U 235U 206Pb
k o eb r eo .a , u o s f n -
m 2 l /b r l
U P
R s n o r y
425A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427Babinski,
M., Chemale Jr., F., Van Schmus,W.R., 1995. The Pb/Pb age of
theMinas Supergroupcarbonate rocks, Quadriltero Ferrfero, Brazil.
Precambrian Research 72, 235245.
Bau, M., 1996. Controls on the fractionation of isovalent trace
elements in magmatic andaqueous systems: evidence from Y/Ho, Zr/Hf,
and lanthanide tetrad effect. Contribu-
of a 3,930-Ma-old granulite from Mount Sones, Enderby Land,
Antarctica. Contribu-tions to Mineralogy and Petrology 94,
427437.
Boiron, M.-C., Moissette, A., Cathelineau, M., Banks, D.,
Monnin, C., Dubessy, J., 1999.Detailed determination of palaeouid
chemistry: an integrated study of sulphatevolatile-rich brines and
aquo-carbonic uids in quartz veins from Ouro Finoeferencestions to
Mineralogy and Petrology 123, 323333.Black, L.P(Bra., Williamzil).
Chemi, I.S., Cocal Geompstology 15, W., 14, 179986. Fou192.r zircon
ages fr m one ock: the historf Degree of concordance = 206Pb/238
age/207 b/206Pb age 100e Rho is the 206Pb/238U/207P /235U-er
or-corre ation coefcient.
alised to GJ-1 (IDTIMS value/measured value); 207Pb/ 35U calcu
ated using 207Pb/206Pb/(238U 206Pb 1/137.88)
d Corrected for b ckground within-r n Pb/U fractionation (in
case of 206Pb/238U) and comm n Pb using the model Pb compo ition o
Stacey and Kramers (1975), subseque tly norc Percentage of c mmon
Pb on 206Pb b.d. = below detection limitb Uranium and P content and
Th/U atio wer calculated relative to GJ-1 reference zircon.a
Within-run bac ground-c rrected mean 207Pb signal in cps (counts
per s cond).2 (%) 1.66 5.53 5.79
2 (abs.) 0.00135 0.0353 0.00328 8 22 128
mean (n = 8) 0.08175 0.6380 0.05660 507 501 475
a125 6800 1682 2600 74.72 1.47 0.08121 1.4 0.6545 2.9 0.05845
2.5 0.49 503 7 511 12 547 56 92
a124 0.08167 0.6451 0.05729 506 505 503
a1236851 1680 2600 74.63 0.40
0.080941.4
0.63734.1
0.057113.9 0.33
5027
50117
49686 101a78
6885 1685 2600 75.73 0.360.08138
1.50.6484
4.80.05778
4.6 0.31 7 19 102 101a77 6789 1691 2600 74.19 0.54 0.08301 1.4
0.6556 5.0 0.05728 4.8 0.29 514 7 512 20 502 106 1026766 1832 2600
68.36 0.68 1.3 4.2 4.0 0.31 504 6 507 17 522 87 97a76 6925 1738
2600 73.30 0.58 0.08244 1.4 0.6240 5.2 0.05490 5.0 0.27 511 7 492
21 408 112 125
a38 6777 1736 2600 72.01 0.53 0.08152 1.4 0.6359 4.4 0.05657 4.2
0.31 505 7 500 18 475 93 106
a37 6899 1690 2700 76.07 0.86 0.08179 1.3 0.6028 5.6 0.05345 5.5
0.24 507 7 479 22 348 124 146
Reference monazite Moacir2 (%) 2.25 2.35 0.48
2 (abs.) 0.0158 0.68 0.0014 60 23 7
Mean (n = 7) 0.7040 29.08 0.2996 3436 3456 3468
a07 196,154 262 240 1.04 0.26 0.6854 1.6 28.01 1.7 0.2964 0.5
0.96 3365 43 3419 17 3451 7 97
a122 0.7077 29.29 0.3002 3450 3463 3471
a121180,498 992 970 1.31 0.14
0.69471.4
28.611.4
0.29870.4 0.97
340137
344014
34635 99a75
144,787 813 760 1.12 0.750.7079
1.329.29
1.40.3001
0.4 0.96 36 14 6 98a74 147,837 167 170 1.55 0.12 0.7079 1.4
29.13 1.6 0.2984 0.6 0.93 3451 39 3458 15 3462 9 100146,787 164 160
1.18 0.27 1.3 1.4 0.4 0.96 3451 35 3463 13 3471 6 99a36 95,645 110
97 0.72 0.19 0.6947 1.4 28.74 1.5 0.3000 0.5 0.94 3400 37 3445 15
3470 8 98
a35 104,671 121 110 0.67 0.23 0.6995 1.4 28.92 1.4 0.2998 0.4
0.96 3419 37 3451 14 3469 6 99
a06 106,789 122 110 0.65 0.01 0.7158 1.4 29.58 1.4 0.2997 0.3
0.97 3480 37 3473 14 3469 5 100
Reference zircon OG-12 (%) 0.84 1.04 0.52
2 (abs.) 0.00045 0.0041 0.0003 3 3 12
Mean (n = 8) 0.05385 0.3962 0.0534 338 339 344
a120 8802 3397 170 0.13 0.19 0.05350 1.4 0.3934 2.0 0.05333 1.4
0.73 336 5 337 6 343 31 98
a119 0.05378 0.3961 0.05342 338 339 347
a739056 3511 180 0.13 0.17
0.054001.5
0.39662.3
0.053271.8 0.65
3395
3397
34040 97a72
8480 711 36 0.12 0.200.05425
1.40.3989
2.10.05333
1.5 0.67 5 6 35 100a34 8888 722 37 0.13 0.13 0.05398 1.4 0.3993
2.2 0.05364 1.7 0.66 339 5 341 6 356 37 956802 522 27 0.13 0.21 1.6
4.3 4.0 0.37 341 5 341 13 343 91 99a33 8412 696 35 0.13 0.05
0.05372 1.5 0.3958 2.0 0.05343 1.3 0.76 337 5 339 6 347 29 97
a05 8991 742 38 0.13 0.07 0.05372 1.5 0.3943 2.1 0.05324 1.4
0.72 337 5 338 6 339 32 100
a04 8614 700 36 0.14 0.02 0.05385 1.5 0.3951 1.9 0.05321 1.2
0.76 338 5 338 6 338 28 100
Reference zircon Pleovice2 (%) 1.23 1.90 1.58
2 (abs.) 0.00121 0.0155 0.0009 7 9 34
Mean (n = 12) 0.09820 0.8139 0.0601 604 605 607
GJ3-12 7242 291 27 0.03 0.06 0.09881 1.6 0.8186 2.0 0.06009 1.3
0.78 607 9 607 9 607 27 100
GJ3-11 0.09743 0.8207 0.06109 599 608 642
GJ3-107318 283 26 0.03 0.06
0.097471.4
0.81001.9
0.060281.3 0.75
6008
6029
61427 93GJ3-9
7010 284 26 0.03 0.070.09873
1.40.8205
1.90.06027
1.3 0.75 8 9 28 98Reference zircon GJ-1GJ3-1 6839 283 26 0.03
0.10 0.09806 1.6 0.8010 2.1 0.05924 1.3 0.79 603 9 597 9 576 28
105GJ3-2 7143 286 26 0.03 0.36 0.09798 1.7 0.8023 4.3 0.05939 3.9
0.39 603 10 598 19 582 85 104GJ3-3 7377 305 28 0.03 0.10 0.09720
1.4 0.8071 1.9 0.06022 1.3 0.74 598 8 601 9 611 28 98GJ3-4 6648 273
25 0.03 0.07 0.09846 1.7 0.8138 2.2 0.05995 1.4 0.76 605 10 605 10
602 31 101GJ3-5 6548 266 24 0.03 0.06 0.09914 1.5 0.8255 2.2
0.06039 1.6 0.71 609 9 611 10 617 33 99GJ3-6 6534 263 24 0.03 0.08
0.09827 1.5 0.8139 2.1 0.06007 1.5 0.69 604 9 605 10 606 33
100GJ3-7 8185 267 25 0.03 1.51 0.09819 1.7 0.8123 2.9 0.05999 2.4
0.59 604 10 604 13 603 51 100GJ3-8 6794 276 25 0.03 0.07 0.09867
1.6 0.8208 2.1 0.06033 1.4 0.75 607 9 608 10 616 30 99
6845 283 26 0.03 0.09 1.5 2.0 1.4 0.73 607 8 608 9 613 29
99Appendix 1. Results of UPb dating of reference materials
Grain number 207Pba Ub Pbb Thb 206Pbcc 206Pbd 2 207P 2 207Pbd 2
rhoe 20Pb 2 207Pb 2 207Pb 2 conc.f
-
426 A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427Cabella,
R., Lucchetti, G., Marescotti, P., 2001. Authigenic monazite and
xenotime frompelitic metacherts in pumpellyite-actinolite-facies
conditions, Sestri-Voltaggio Zone,central Liguria, Italy. Canadian
Mineralogist 39, 717727.
Cabral, A.R., Koglin, N., 2012. Hydrothermal uid source
constrained by Co/Ni ratiosin coexisting arsenopyrite and
tourmaline: the auriferous lode of Passagem,Quadriltero Ferrfero of
Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mineralogy and Petrology 104,137145.
Cabral, A.R., Lehmann, B., Tupinamb, M., Schlosser, S.,
Kwitko-Ribeiro, R., de Abreu, F.R.,2009. The platiniferous AuPd
belt of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and genesis of itsbotryoidal PtPdHg
aggregates. Economic Geology 104, 12651276.
Cabral, A.R., Lehmann, B., Tupinamb, M., Wiedenbeck, M., Brauns,
M., 2011. Geology,mineral chemistry and tourmaline B isotopes of
the Crrego Bom Sucessoarea, southern Serra do Espinhao, Minas
Gerais, Brazil: implications forAuPdPt exploration in quartzitic
terrain. Journal of Geochemical Exploration110, 260277.
Cabral, A.R., Koglin, N., Seabra Gomes Jr., A.A., Lehmann, B.,
2012a. Xenotimehematiteaggregates on opaline laments: evidence for
biomineralization in weatheredsiliciclastic rocks, Capanema,
Quadriltero Ferrfero of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Interna-tional
Journal of Earth Sciences 101, 377383.
Cabral, A.R., Zeh, A., Koglin, N., Seabra Gomes Jr., A.A.,
Viana, D.J., Lehmann, B., 2012b.Dating the Itabira iron formation,
Quadriltero Ferrfero of Minas Gerais, Brazil, at2.65 Ga:
depositional UPb age of zircon from a metavolcanic layer.
PrecambrianResearch 204205, 4045.
Cabral, A.R., Eugster, O., Brauns, M., Lehmann, B., Rsel, D.,
Zack, T., de Abreu, F.R.,Pernicka, E., Barth, M., 2013a. Direct
dating of gold by radiogenic helium: testingthe method on gold from
Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Geology 41, 163166.
Cabral, A.R., Koglin, N., Strauss, H., Brtz, H., Kwitko-Ribeiro,
R., 2013b. Regional sulfatehematitesulde zoning in the auriferous
Mariana anticline, Quadriltero Ferrferoof Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Mineralium Deposita 48, 805816.
Cabral, A.R., Zeh, A., Galbiatti, H.F., Lehmann, B., in press.
Late-Cambrian AuPd minerali-zation and Fe enrichment in the Itabira
district, Minas Gerais, Brazil, at 496 Ma: con-straints from UPb
monazite dating of a jacutinga lode. Economic Geology.
Cavalcanti, J.A.D., Xavier, R.P., 2006. Origem dos turmalinitos
aurferos da regio sudestedo Quadriltero Ferrfero-MG: geologia,
petrograa, qumica mineral e istopos deNd. Revista Brasileira de
Geocincias 36, 646647.
Chauvet, A., Faure, M., Dossin, I., Charvet, J., 1994. A
three-stage structural evolution of theQuadriltero Ferrfero:
consequences for the Neoproterozoic age and the formationof gold
concentrations of the Ouro Preto area, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
PrecambrianResearch 68, 139167.
Chauvet, A., Piantone, P., Barbanson, L., Nehlig, P.,
Pedroletti, I., 2001. Gold deposit forma-tion during collapse
tectonics: structural, mineralogical, geochronological, and
uidinclusion constraints in the Ouro Preto goldmines, Quadriltero
Ferrfero, Brazil. Eco-nomic Geology 96, 2548.
Cherniak, D.J., 2006. Pb and rare earth element diffusion in
xenotime. Lithos 88, 114.Cherniak, D.J., Watson, B.E., 2001. Pb
diffusion in zircon. Chemical Geology 172, 524.Dempster, T.J., Hay,
D.C., Bluck, B.J., 2004. Zircon growth in slate. Geology 32,
221224.Derby, O.A., 1911. On the mineralization of the gold-bearing
lode of Passagem, Minas
Geraes, Brazil. American Journal of Science 32, 185190.Dorr,
J.V.N., 1969. Physiographic, stratigraphic and structural
development of the
Quadriltero Ferrfero, Minas Gerais, Brazil. U.S. Geological
Survey ProfessionalPaper 641-A.
Ferrand, P., 1894. L'Or a Minas Geraes (Brsil). Imprensa Ofcial
do Estado de MinasGeraes, Ouro Preto.
Fleischer, R., Routhier, P., 1973. The consanguineous origin of
a tourmaline-bearing golddeposit: Passagem de Mariana (Brazil).
Economic Geology 68, 1122.
Galbiatti, H.F., Cabral, A.R., Lehmann, B., Kwitko-Ribeiro, R.,
2009. Ouro preto found atTimbopeba iron-ore deposit, Minas Gerais,
Brazil. Neues Jahrbuch fr Geologie undPalontologie Abhandlungen
253, 1523.
Garda, G.M., Xavier, R.P., Cavalcanti, J.A.D., Trumbull, R.B.,
Wiedenbeck, M., 2010. Signi-cance of compositional and boron
isotope variations in tourmaline of Passagem deMariana gold mine,
Quadriltero Ferrfero, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Acta
Mineralogica-Petrograca Abstract Series 6, 483.
Gasquet, D., Bertrand, J.-M., Paquette, J.-L., Lehman, J.,
Ratzov, G., De Asceno-Guedes, R.,Tiepolo, M., Boullier, A.-M.,
Scaillet, S., Nomade, S., 2010. Miocene to Messinian defor-mation
and hydrothermal activity in a pre-Alpine basement massif of the
Frenchwestern Alps: new UThPb and argon ages from the Lauzire
massif. Bulletin dela Socit Gologique de France 181, 227241.
Geisler, T., Ulonska, M., Schleicher, H., Pidgeon, R.T., van
Bronswijk, W., 2001. Leachingand differential recrystallization of
metamict zircon under experimental hydrother-mal conditions.
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 141, 5365.
Geisler, T., Rashwan, A.A., Rahn, M., Poller, U., Zwingmann, H.,
Pidgeon, R.T., Schleicher, H.,Tomaschek, F., 2003a. Low-temperature
hydrothermal alteration of natural metamictzircons from the Eastern
Desert, Egypt. Mineralogical Magazine 67, 485508.
Geisler, T., Zhang, M., Salje, E.K.H., 2003b. Recrystallization
of almost fully amorphouszircon under hydrothermal conditions: an
infrared spectroscopic study. Journal ofNuclear Materials 320,
280291.
Geisler, T., Schaltegger, U., Tomaschek, F., 2007.
Re-equilibration of zircon in aqueousuids and melts. Elements 3,
4551.
Gerdes, A., Zeh, A., 2006. Combined UPb and Hf isotope
LA(MC)ICPMS analyses of de-trital zircons: comparison with SHRIMP
and new constraints for the provenance andage of an Armorican
metasediment in central Germany. Earth and Planetary ScienceLetters
249, 4761.
Gerdes, A., Zeh, A., 2009. Zircon formation versus zircon
alterationnew insights fromcombined UPb and LuHf in situ LAICPMS
analyses, and consequences for the in-terpretation of Archean
zircon from the Central Zone of the Limpopo Belt. ChemicalGeology
261, 230243.Guimares, D., 1970. Arqueognese do ouro na regio
central de Minas Gerais.Departamento Nacional da Produo Mineral,
Diviso de Fomento da ProduoMineral, Rio de Janeiro, Boletim
139.
Harder, E.C., Chamberlin, R.T., 1915. The geology of central
Minas Geraes, Brazil. Journal ofGeology 23, 341378, 385424.
Hartmann, L.A., Endo, I., Suita, M.T.F., Santos, J.O.S., Frantz,
J.C., Carneiro, M.A.,McNaughton, N.J., Barley, M.E., 2006.
Provenance and age delimitation ofQuadriltero Ferrfero sandstones
based on zircon UPb isotopes. Journal of SouthAmerican Earth
Sciences 20, 273285.
Hay, D.C., Dempster, T.J., 2009. Zircon behaviour during
low-temperature metamorphism.Journal of Petrology 50, 571589.
Heinrich, W., Andrehs, G., Franz, G., 1997. Monazitexenotime
miscibility gap thermom-etry. I. An empirical calibration. Journal
of Metamorphic Geology 15, 316.
Hoskin, P.W.O., 2005. Trace-element composition of hydrothermal
zircon and the alter-ation of Hadean zircon from the Jack Hills,
Australia. Geochimica et CosmochimicaActa 69, 637648.
Hoskin, P.W.O., Schaltegger, U., 2003. The composition of zircon
and igneous andmetamorphic petrogenesis. Reviews in Mineralogy and
Geochemistry 53, 2762.
Hussak, E., 1898. Der goldfhrende, kiesige Quarzlagergang von
Passagem in MinasGeraes, Brasilien. Zeitschrift fr praktische
Geologie 5, 345357.
Hussak, E., 1904. ber das Vorkommen von Palladium und Platin in
Brasilien.Sitzungsberichte der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen
Klasse der KaiserlichenAkademie der Wissenschaften 113, 379466.
Jackson, S.E., Pearson, N.J., Grifn, W.L., Belousova, E.A.,
2004. The application of laserablationinductively coupled
plasmamass spectrometry to in situ UPb zircon.Geochronology 211,
4769.
Koglin, N., Zeh, A., Cabral, A.R., Seabra Gomes Jr., A.A., Corra
Neto, A.V., Brunetto, W.J.,Galbiatti, H., 2014. Depositional age
and sediment source of the auriferous MoedaFormation, Quadriltero
Ferrfero of Minas Gerais, Brazil: new constraints from UPbHf
isotopes in zircon and xenotime. Precambrian Research 255,
96108.
Krogh, T.E., Davis, G.L., 1975. Alteration in zircons and
differential dissolution of alteredand metamict zircon. Carnegie
Institution of Washington, Year Book 74, 619623.
Ladeira, E.A., 1988. Metalogenia dos depsitos de ouro do
Quadriltero Ferrfero, MinasGerais. In: Schobbenhaus, C., Coelho,
C.E.S. (Eds.), Principais Depsitos Minerais doBrasil Volume III.
Departamento Nacional da Produo Mineral, Companhia, pp.301375.
Lee, J.K.W., Williams, I., Ellis, D.J., 1997. Pb, U and Th
diffusion in natural zircon. Nature390, 159163.
Liu, Z.C., Wu, F.Y., Guo, U.O., Zhao, Z.F., Yang, J.H., Sun,
J.F., 2011. In situ UPb datingof xenotime by laser ablation
(LA)ICPMS. Chinese Science Bulletin 56, 29482956.
Ludwig, K., 2001. Isoplot/Ex, rev. 2.49. A Geochronological
Toolkit for Microsoft Excel.Berkeley Geochronology Center, Special
Publications 1a.
Machado, N., Schrank, A., Noce, C.M., Gauthier, G., 1996. Ages
of detrital zircon fromArcheanPaleoproterozoic sequences:
implications for greenstone belt setting andevolution of a
Transamazonian foreland basin in Quadriltero Ferrfero,
southeastBrazil. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 141,
259276.
Marshak, S., Alkmim, F.F., Jordt-Evangelista, H., 1992.
Proterozoic crustal extension andthe generation of dome-and-keel
structure in an Archaean granitegreenstoneterrane. Nature 357,
491493.
McDonough, W.F., Sun, S.-s., 1995. The composition of the Earth.
Chemical Geology 120,223253.
McLennan, S.M., 1989. Rare earth elements in sedimentary rocks:
inuence of provenanceand sedimentary processes. Reviews in
Mineralogy 21, 169200.
Mezger, K., Krogstad, E.J., 1997. Interpretation of discordant
UPb zircon agesanevaluation. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 15,
127140.
Oberthr, T., Weiser, T.W., 2008. Goldbismuthtelluridesulphide
assemblages at theViceroy mine, HarareBinduraShamva greenstone
belt, Zimbabwe. MineralogicalMagazine 72, 953970.
Pidgeon, R.T., 1992. Recrystallisation of oscillatory zoned
zircon: some geochronological andpetrological implications.
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 110, 463473.
Pires, F.R.M., 1995. Textural and mineralogical variations
during metamorphism of theProterozoic Itabira Iron Formation in the
Quadriltero Ferrfero, Minas Gerais,Brazil. Anais da Academia
Brasileira de Cincias 67, 77105.
Pyle, J.M., Spear, F.S., Rudnick, R.L., McDonough, W.F., 2001.
Monazitexenotimegarnetequilibrium in metapelites and a new
monazitegarnet thermometer. Journal ofPetrology 42, 20832107.
Rasmussen, B., 2005. Zircon growth in very low grade
metasedimentary rocks: evidencefor zirconium mobility at 250 C.
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 150,146155.
Schrank, A., Machado, N., 1996. Idades UPb emmonazitas e zirces
das minas de MorroVelho e Passagem deMariana Quadriltero Ferrfero
(MG). 39. Congresso Brasileirode Geologia, Anais 6, pp. 470472.
Slma, J., Koler, J., Condon, D.J., Crowley, J.L., Gerdes, A.,
Hanchar, J.M., Horstwood, M.S.A.,Morris, G.A., Nasdala, L.,
Norberg, N., Schaltegger, U., Schoene, B., Tubrett,
M.N.,Whitehouse, M.J., 2008. Pleovice zircona new natural reference
material forUPb and Hf isotopic microanalysis. Chemical Geology
249, 135.
Spear, F.S., Pyle, J.M., 2002. Apatite, monazite, and xenotime
in metamorphic rocks.Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 48,
293335.
Spier, C.A., de Oliveira, S.M.B., Sial, A.N., Rios, F.J., 2007.
Geochemistry and genesis of thebanded iron formations of the Cau
Formation, Quadriltero Ferrfero, Minas Gerais,Brazil. Precambrian
Research 152, 170206.
Stacey, J., Kramers, J.D., 1975. Approximation of terrestrial
lead isotope evolution by atwo-stage model. Earth and Planetary
Science Letters 26, 207221.
Stern, R.A., Bodorkos, S., Kamo, S.L., Hickman, A.H., Corfu, F.,
2009. Measurement of SIMSinstrumental mass fractionation of Pb
isotopes during zircon dating. Geostandardsand Geoanalytical
Research 33, 145168.
-
Suzuki, K., Adachi, M., 1991. Precambrian provenance and
Silurian metamorphism of theTsubonosawa paragneiss in the south
Kitakami terrane, northeast Japan, revealed bythe chemical ThUtotal
Pb isochron ages of monazite, zircon and xenotime. Geo-chemical
Journal 25, 357376.
Vavra, G., Schmid, R., Gebauer, D., 1999. Internal morphology,
habit and UThPb micro-analysis of amphibolite-to-granulite facies
zircons: geochronology of the Ivrea Zone(Southern Alps).
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 134, 380404.
Vial, D.S., Duarte, B.P., Fuzikawa, K., Vieira, M.B.H., 2007. An
epigenetic origin for thePassagem de Mariana gold deposit,
Quadriltero Ferrfero, Minas Gerais, Brazil. OreGeology Reviews 32,
596613.
von Eschwege, W.L., 1822. Geognostisches Gemlde von Brasilien
und wahrscheinlichesMuttergestein der Diamanten.
Landes-Industrie-Comptoir, Weimar.
von Eschwege, W.L., 1832. Beitrge zur Gebirgskunde Brasiliens.
G. Reimer, Berlin.
Wilke, M., Schmidt, C., Dubrail, J., Appel, K., Borchert, M.,
Kvashnina, K., Manning, C.E., 2012.Zircon solubility and zirconium
complexation in H2O + Na2O + SiO2 Al2O3 uids athigh pressure and
temperature. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 349350, 1525.
Yeats, C.J., McNaughton, N.J., Groves, D.I., 1996. SHRIMP UPb
geochronological con-straints on Archean volcanic-hosted massive
sulde and lode gold mineralization atMount Gibson, Yilgarn Craton,
West Australia. Journal of Geology 96, 13541371.
Zeh, A., Gerdes, A., Will, T.M., Frimmel, H., 2010. Hafnium
isotope homogenization duringmetamorphic zircon growth in
amphibolite-facies rocks, examples from the Shackle-ton Range
(Antarctica). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 74, 47404758.
Zeh, A., Gerdes, A., 2014. HFSE-transport and U-Pb-Hf isotope
homogenization mediatedby Ca-bearing aqueous uids at 2.04 Ga:
constraints from zircon, monazite, and gar-net of the Venetia
Klippe, Limpopo Belt, South Africa. Geochimica et CosmochimicaActa
138, 81100.
427A.R. Cabral, A. Zeh / Lithos 212-215 (2015) 415427
Detrital zircon without detritus: a result of 496-Ma-old
fluidrock interaction during the gold-lode formation of Passag...1.
Introduction2. Geological setting and Passagem de Mariana3. Samples
and methods3.1. Samples3.2. Methods3.2.1. Petrography and
geochemistry3.2.2. In-situ analyses for UThPb isotopes
4. Results4.1. Petrography4.2. Whole-rock chemical analyses4.3.
UraniumPb ages
5. Discussion5.1. Timing of zircon and xenotime formation5.2.
Protolith nature and fluidrock interaction5.3. Gold rush to Minas
Gerais
6. ConclusionAcknowledgementsAppendix1. Results of UPb dating of
reference materialsReferences