Top Banner

Click here to load reader

of 22

1 PFADS Design Project Team Whitey Ryan Sellman Jason Marks Toby Taylor University of the Pacific 3601 Pacific Ave. Stockton, CA 95211.

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Slide 1
  • 1 PFADS Design Project Team Whitey Ryan Sellman Jason Marks Toby Taylor University of the Pacific 3601 Pacific Ave. Stockton, CA 95211
  • Slide 2
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey2 Overview 4 Introduction 4 Objectives 4 Approach 4 Results 4 Conclusions 4 Recommendations
  • Slide 3
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey3 Introduction e Create P.F.A.D.S. e Compete against other P.F.A.D.S. e Must follow given constraints
  • Slide 4
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey4 Constraints 4 18x 18x 18 4 No more than 10 pounds 4 Less than $20
  • Slide 5
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey5 Criteria 4 Minimize weight 4 Maximize accuracy 4 Minimize volume 4 Rolls/slides straight
  • Slide 6
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey6 Objectives 4 Practice the design process 4 Learn about projectile motion 4 Work as a team
  • Slide 7
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey7 Preliminary Ideas 4 Rubber Band 4 Flexible Steel 4 Mousetrap
  • Slide 8
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey8 Rubber Band
  • Slide 9
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey9 Flexible Steel
  • Slide 10
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey10 Mousetrap
  • Slide 11
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey11 Refinement 4 Flexible steel not accurate 4 Rubber band not powerful 4 Mousetrap idea best fit 4 Spring loaded catapult
  • Slide 12
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey12 Spring Design
  • Slide 13
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey13 Implementation 4 Decided on mousetrap 4 Mousetrap failed, changed to springs for more power.
  • Slide 14
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey14 Final Design
  • Slide 15
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey15 Construction 4 Listed parts needed and bought them. 4 Used Tool from Tobys Room 4 Made working design
  • Slide 16
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey16 Testing 4 Mousetrap idea was too weak 4 Went back to decision process 4 Decided on a stronger spring design
  • Slide 17
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey17 Final Mechanism 4 Slides on boards 4 Spring powered 4 Pulley triggered 4 Weight
  • Slide 18
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey18 Picture Of Final Design
  • Slide 19
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey19 Results 4 Trigger Mechanism did not work in competition. 4 Resulted in embarrassment and no score. 4 Advantages 4 Disadvantages
  • Slide 20
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey20 Recommendations 4 Mousetrap is not powerful enough 4 Wood and metal 4 Add better mechanism for rolling straight.
  • Slide 21
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey21 Conclusions 4 Need a better design 4 Needed more testing before competition. 4 Needed more reliable materials.
  • Slide 22
  • Dec. 12Team Whitey22 Acknowledgement 4 John (Home Depot Employee) 4 Henry (engineer student) 4 Brandon Stevens (roommate)