Top Banner
1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio
38

1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

Dec 23, 2015

Download

Documents

Briana Berry
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

1

ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING

Frankfurt FFFM

March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013

Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio

Page 2: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

2

ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING1. Learning Organization vs. Organizational Learning.

Definitions, Levels of Learning2. Single Loope Learning vs. Double Loop Learning3. Activities of Organizational Learning4. Learn to Learn5. Communities of practices6. Routines 7. Trust 8. Team Management

1. MBTI Indicator of Personality2. People interactios

9. Clusters – Open Innovation

Page 3: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

3

INTRODUCTION

Nonaka suggested that companies use metaphors to focus thinking, encourage dialogue and make tacit, instinctively understood ideas explicit.

Sound idyllic? AbsolutelyDesirable? Without question.But does it provide a framework for action?

Hardly

Page 4: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

4

INTRODUCTION

A LEARNING ORGANIZATION

IS AN ORGANIZATION SKILLED AT CREATING, ACQUIRING, AND TRANSFERRING KNOWLEDGE, ANT AT MODYFING ITS BEHAVIOUR TO REFLECT NEW KNOWLEDGE AND INSIGHTS.

(Garvin, 1993 “Building a Learning Organization”).

Page 5: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

5

LEARNING ORGANIZATION

It is a firm that purposefully constructs structures and strategies, to enhance and maximizes Orgnizational Learning.

The concept of a learning organization has become popular since organizations want to be more adaptable to change.

Page 6: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

6

ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING- LEARNING ORGANIZATION

The detection and correction of error (Argyris & Schön, 1978)

The process of improving actions through better knowledge and understanding (Fyol & Lyles, 1985)

The way firms build,supplement, and organize knowledge and routines around their and within their cultures and adapt and develop organizational efficiency by improving the use of the broad skills of their workforces. (Dodgson, 1993)

Learning occurs in an organization “if through its processing of information, the range of its (organization’s) potential behaviors is changed (Huber, 1991)

Page 7: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

7

Levels in the LEARNING ORGANIZATION

INDIVIDUAL LEARNING ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING (OL)

Since the individuals form the bulk of the organization, they must establish the necessary forms and processes to enable organizational learning in order to facilitate change.

OL is more than the sum of the parts of individual learning.

An organization does not lose out on its learning abilities when members leave the organization.

Page 8: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

8

LEARNING SYSTEMS

Organizational learning contributes to organizational memory.

Learning systems, not only influence immediate members, but also future members, due to the accumulation of histories, experiences, norms and stories.

Equally important is the creation of an unlearning organization which essentially means that the organization must forget some of its past.

Page 9: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

9

3 types of ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING

SINGLE-LOOP LEARNING DOUBLE-LOOP LEARNING DEUTERO-LEARNING

Page 10: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

10

SINGLE-LOOP LEARNING

This occurs when errors are detected and corrected.

Firms continue with their present policies and goals.

This is the “Lower-level Learning”, “Not-Strategic Learning”, “

This “Adaptive Learning”.

Page 11: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

11

DOUBLE-LOOP LEARNING

This occurs when, in additiion to detection and correction of errors, the organization questions and modifies its existing norms, procedures, policies and objectives.

It involves changing the organization’s knowledge-base or firm-specific competences or routines.

It is calles “Higher-Level Learning”, “Strategic Learning” :Learning to expand organization’s

capabilities The process by which and organization makes sense of its

environment in ways that broaden The range of objectives it can pursue or The range of resources and actions available to it for processing

these objectives.

Page 12: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

12

DEUTERO-LEARNING

This occurs when organizations learn HOW to CARRY OUT Single-loop learning and Double-loop Learning.

Being aware of ignorace motivates learning.

Identification of LEARNING STYLES and FACILITATING FACTORS required to promote learning.

Page 13: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

13

STRATEGIC LEARNING

WHY AND HOW to change the organization.

DOUBLE-LOOP LEARNING DEUTERO-LEARNING

(Single-loop learning is concerned with accepting change without questioning underlying assumptions and core beliefs)

Page 14: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

14

Three Ms in Learning Organizations

MEANING: Well-grounded definition, actionalbe and easy to

apply MANAGEMENT

Clear guidelines for practice,filled with operational advice rather than high aspirations.

MEASUREMENT Tools for assessig an organization’s rate and

level of learning to ensure that gains have in fact made.

Page 15: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

15

ACTIVITIES OF LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS

SYSTEMATIC PROBLEM SOLVING EXPERIMENTATION WITH NEW APPROACHES LEARNING FROM THEIR OWN EXPERIENCE AND

PAST HISTORY LEARNING FROM THE EXPERIENCES AND BEST

PRACTICES OF OTHERS TRANSFERRING KNOWLEDGE QUICKLY AND

EFFICIENTLY

Page 16: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

16

SYSTEMATIC PROBLEM SOLVING

Ideas of Quality Movement Plan, Do, Check, Act cycle Insisting on data rather than assumptions Using simple statistical tools

DOUBLE-LOOP LEARNING Insisting on assumptions

Page 17: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

17

EXPERIMENTATION

Systematic search for and testing of new knowledge.

It is usually motivated by opportunity and expanding horizons, not by current difficulties (as happens in Problem-solving)

Page 18: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

18

LEARNING FROM PAST EXPERIENCE

Companies must review their successes and failures, assess them systematically, and record the lessons in a form that employees find open and accesible.

A productive failure is one that leads to insight, understanding, and thus an addition to the commonly held wisdom of the organization.

Page 19: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

19

LEARNING FROM OTHERS

Not all learning cames from reflection and self-analysis.

Sometimes the most powerful insights come from looking outside one’s immediate environment to gain a new perspective.

BENCHMARKING is an ongoing investigation and learning experience that ensures that best industry practices are uncovered, analyzed, adopted and implemented. The greatest benefits came from stuying practices, the

way that work gets done, rather than results, and from involving line managers in the process.

Page 20: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

20

TRANSFERRING KNOWLEDGE

FOR SUCCESFULL LEARNING, KNOWLEDGE MUST SPREAD QUICKLY AND EFFICIENTLY THROUGHOUT THE ORGANIZATION.

Ideas carry maximum impact when they are shared broadly rather than held in a few hands.

Mechanisms: Written, oral and visual reports Site visits and tours Personnel rotation programs Education and training programs Standardization programs

Absorbing facts by reading them or seeing them demonstrated is one thing; experiencing them personally is quite another.

It is very difficult to become knowledgeable in a passive way

Page 21: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

21

FIRST STEPS IN LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS: MANAGERS

LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS CULTIVATE THE ART OF OPEN, ATTENTATIVE LISTENING.

MANAGERS MUST BE OPEN TO CRITICISM.

The first step is to foster and environment that is conductive to learning.

Only if top management explicitly frees up employees’ time for the purpose does learning occur with any frequency.

Page 22: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

22

LEARN TO LEARN: Manage the creative process

UNDERSTAND YOUR SELF: IDENTIFY HOW YOU THINK AND PROCESS INFORMATION

The MYERS-BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR

DESPERSONALIZE CONFLICT

Successful managers spend time getting members of diverse groups to acknowledge their differences

INNOVATION requires COLLABORATION AMONG VARIOUS PLAYERS WHO SEE THE WORLD IN INHERENTLY DIFFERENT WAYS.

UNDERSTAND ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES

Page 23: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE

Communities of practice are groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly. ( E. Wenger) Communities of practice enable practitioners to take collective responsibility for

managing the knowledge they need, recognizing that, given the proper structure, they are in the best position to do this.

Communities among practitioners create a direct link between learning and performance, because the same people participate in communities of practice and in teams and business units.

Practitioners can address the tacit and dynamic aspects of knowledge creation and sharing, as well as the more explicit aspects.

Communities are not limited by formal structures: they create connections among people across organizational and geographic boundaries.

http://www.ewenger.com/theory/23

Page 24: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

24

ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES

Learning is stored in routines Patterned sequences of learned behavior involving multiple

actors authority who are linked by relations of communication and/or

Routines are a structural feature of organizations It is a system that control action and interaction Experience constructs socially-approved conceptions of

efficient and legitimae practices that become encoded in routines or the rules of the game.

Routines include not only demands, concerns and skills, but also subjectivity, meaning and learning.

Organizations use LEARNING AS A BASIS FOR CHANGING ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES

Page 25: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

ROUTINES

25

ROUTINES INTERACTION Tangibles & Intangible Resources

(knowledge)

TEAM MANAGEMENT - Trust

DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES Evolution of Linkages- Interaction inside the firm and within CLUSTERS

Dynamic nature of intangible resources

INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL Measure & Management Intangible Resources

Page 26: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

26

ROUTINES STRUCTURAL CONTEXT

HARD MODEL: The actors are linked through AUTHORITY POWER, CONTROL, AUTONOMY

SOFT MODEL: The actors are linked through COMMUNICATION COLLECTIVE MIND, Leadership

MULTIPLE ACTORS GAIN, MAINTAIN AND NEGOTIATE POWER BY INTENTIONALLY HOLDIGN, SHARING AND MODIFYING INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE.

EXPERIENCE HAS TO BE INTERPRETED IN ORDER TO LEARN FORM IT, BUT THERE ARE THREATS TO VALID INFERENCE. Múltiple actors tend to interpret throug calling attentio to varios sources of ambiguity

that undermine organizatioonal judgments of success and failure.

By changing our INTERPRETIVE CONCEPTS NOW, WE MODIFY WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED EARLIER.

TRUST Diversity might be appropriate for learning, but mutual learning requires a context

where actors are linked through exchanging and open sharing of valid information in a setting where they have confidence and come to TRUST one another.

The voluntary transfer of experience is an act of trust that may reside in IDENTITY and in RECIPROCITY.

Page 27: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

27

TRUST

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE

Managing Emotion

Understanding Emotion

Using Emotion

Perceiving Emotion

COGNITIVE

AFFECTIVE

CALCULUS- BASEDTRUST

KNOWLEDGE- BASEDTRUST

IDENTIFICATION-BASEDTRUST

Levels of TRUST

InformationTechnology

Components of TRUST

Identity

Page 28: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

28

TEAMS

Teams can create more adaptative organizations that are able to respond with agility.

The practical knowledge about how to actually operate project teams is still in an embryonic stage.

Page 29: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

29

TEAM MANAGER & TRUST

Emotional Intelligence

TRUST

Project ManagerMatrix OrganizationTeam Work

AGILITY

Identity, Values

Agility and Project Managers: The Role of Emotional Intelligence and Trust

Page 30: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

30

Emotional Intelligence and Trust

Appraisal of “Management by Wondering around” http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_72.htmhttp://www.economist.com/node/12075015

this approach fostered high morale and personal satisfaction among the company’s workforce Ex. HP:The “Rules of the Garage” “The HP way” builds on the beliefs and core values inherent

in the HP Way: http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/business-brains/time-for-more-mbwa-management-by-walking-around/1040

         respect for the individual,          contribution to customers and the community,          uncompromising integrity,          teamwork          innovation.

Improve performance in matrix organizations by applying the four components of emotional intelligence, specifically, managing, understanding, using, and perceiving emotion, to each interpersonal challenge

It is easy for the Project Manager to get involved in social and organizational activities that promote the different levels of trust, even reaching the IBT (Identity Based Trust)

In order to increase trust and EI, people at HP find many types of socialization activities ICT contribute to develop better communication and transmission of information in real time

Page 31: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

TEAM MANAGEMENT

How people interact? People personality People interactions

31

Page 32: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

TEAM MANAGEMENT:MBTI INDICATOR OF PERSONALITY

2 dimensions: HOW PEOPLE PERCEIVE

How people become aware of things, people, happening or ideas Extraversion vs. Introversion

JUDGE The ways of coming to conclussions of what

have been perceived Intuition vs. Sensing

32

Page 33: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

MBTI, preferences of individuals

Favorite world: Do you prefer to focus on the outer world or on your own inner world? This is called Extraversion (E) or Introversion (I).

Information: Do you prefer to focus on the basic information you take in or do you prefer to interpret and add meaning? This is called Sensing (S) or Intuition (N).

Decisions: When making decisions, do you prefer to first look at logic and consistency or first look at the people and special circumstances? This is called Thinking (T) or Feeling (F).

Structure: In dealing with the outside world, do you prefer to get things decided or do you prefer to stay open to new information and options? This is called Judging (J) or Perceiving (P).

33

Page 34: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

ISTJ Quiet, serious, earn success by thoroughness and dependability. Practical, matter-of-fact, realistic, and responsible. Decide logically what should be done and work toward it steadily, regardless of distractions.

Take pleasure in making everything orderly and organized – their work, their home, their life. Value traditions and loyalty. ISFJ Quiet, friendly, responsible, and conscientious. Committed and steady in meeting their obligations. Thorough, painstaking, and accurate. Loyal, considerate, notice and remember specifics about people who are

important to them, concerned with how others feel. Strive to create an orderly and harmonious environment at work and at home. INFJ Seek meaning and connection in ideas, relationships, and material possessions. Want to understand what motivates people and are insightful about others. Conscientious and committed to their firm values.

Develop a clear vision about how best to serve the common good. Organized and decisive in implementing their vision. INTJ Have original minds and great drive for implementing their ideas and achieving their goals. Quickly see patterns in external events and develop long-range explanatory perspectives. When committed, organize a

job and carry it through. Skeptical and independent, have high standards of competence and performance – for themselves and others. ISTP Tolerant and flexible, quiet observers until a problem appears, then act quickly to find workable solutions. Analyze what makes things work and readily get through large amounts of data to isolate the core of

practical problems. Interested in cause and effect, organize facts using logical principles, value efficiency. ISFP Quiet, friendly, sensitive, and kind. Enjoy the present moment, what’s going on around them. Like to have their own space and to work within their own time frame. Loyal and committed to their values and to

people who are important to them. Dislike disagreements and conflicts, do not force their opinions or values on others. INFP Idealistic, loyal to their values and to people who are important to them. Want an external life that is congruent with their values. Curious, quick to see possibilities, can be catalysts for implementing ideas. Seek

to understand people and to help them fulfill their potential. Adaptable, flexible, and accepting unless a value is threatened. INTP Seek to develop logical explanations for everything that interests them. Theoretical and abstract, interested more in ideas than in social interaction. Quiet, contained, flexible, and adaptable. Have unusual ability

to focus in depth to solve problems in their area of interest. Skeptical, sometimes critical, always analytical. ESTP Flexible and tolerant, they take a pragmatic approach focused immediate results. Theories and conceptual explanations bore them – they want to act energetically to solve the problem. Focus o n the here-and-

now, spontaneous, enjoy each moment that they can be active with others. Enjoy material comforts and style. Learn best through doing. ESFP Outgoing, friendly, and accepting. Exuberant lovers of life, people, and material comforts. Enjoy working with others to make things happen. Bring common sense and a realistic approach to their work, and make

work fun. Flexible and spontaneous, adapt readily to new people and environments. Learn best by trying a new skill with other people. ENFP Warmly enthusiastic and imaginative. See life as full of possibilities. Make connections between events and information very quickly, and confidently proceed based on the patterns they see. Want a lot of

affirmation from others, and readily give appreciation and spanport. Spontaneous and flexible, often rely on their ability to improvise and their verbal fluency. ENTP Quick, ingenious, stimulating, alert, and outspoken. Resourceful in solving new and challenging problems. Adept at generating conceptual possibilities and then analyzing them strategically. Good at reading

other people. Bored by routine, will seldom do the same thing the same way, apt to turn to one new interest after another. ESTJ Practical, realistic, matter-of-fact. Decisive, quickly move to implement decisions. Organize projects and people to get things done, focus on getting results in the most efficient way possible. Take care of routine

details. Have a clear set of logical standards, systematically follow them and want others to also. Forceful in implementing their plans. ESFJ Warmhearted, conscientious, and cooperative. Want harmony in their environment, work with determination to establish it. Like to work with others to complete tasks accurately and on time. Loyal, follow through

even in small matters. Notice what others need in their day-by-day lives and try to provide it. Want to be appreciated for who they are and for what they contribute. ENFJ Warm, empathetic, responsive, and responsible. Highly attuned to the emotions, needs, and motivations of others. Find potential in everyone, want to help others fulfill their potential. May act as catalysts for

individual and group growth. Loyal, responsive to praise and criticism. Sociable, facilitate others in a group, and provide inspiring leadership. ENTJ 34

http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/the-16-mbti-types.aspMYERS-BRIGS INDICATOR, TYPES

Page 35: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

PEOPLE INTERACTIONS

Consider the personality the everyperson and study their interactions for analyzing:

Team building Leadership Communications Team dynamics

http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/teambuilding.html

http://www.coaching-for-new-women-managers.com/Myers-Briggs-Type-Indicator.html

35

Page 36: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

CLUSTERS – open innovation

FIRMS & LOCATION GEOGRAPHICALLY CONCENTRATED

NETWORKS WHERE NEW KNOWLEDGE IS CREATED AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING DEVELOPED

Ex: http://www.kompetenznetze.de/initiative INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINES Open innovation:

the use of purposive inflows and outflows of knowledge to accelerate internal innovation and to expand the markets for external use of innovation, respectively”. (Chesbrought 2003)

36

Page 37: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

St. Louis Biobelt Clusterhttp://www.divergence.com/images/downloads/biobelt.pdf

http://www.stlcommercemagazine.com/archives/april2006/cover.html

http://www.bioenterprise.com/images/company_assets/512F1C7F-0D64-4A5E-9D91-785DC064755F/bioregionstlouiseyesclevelandjuly2008_f5b2.PDF

Cluster - Example

37

Page 38: 1 ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Frankfurt FFFM March 2008 - Sept. 2009 – March 2013 Prof. Dr. Irene Martín-Rubio.

38

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION