1 Open Workshop on NGN, Brussels, June 22, 2005 © Copyright Ericsson AB 2005. All right reserved. 3G RAN Long Term Evolution alias Super 3G alias S3G NB!:

1 Open Workshop on NGN, Brussels, June 22, 2005© Copyright Ericsson AB 2005. All right reserved.

3G RANLong Term Evolution alias

”Super 3G” alias

”S3G”

NB!: 3G Long Term Evolution is still in the process of being standardized within 3GPP, and this presentation includes some Ericsson working assumptions which in the end might deviate from the final standard.

Dr. Håkan AnderssonDirector, S3G Program ManagerWCDMA Radio NetworkBusiness Unit AccessEricsson AB


Access development in NGN

Everything

Everything

Over

All applications(e.g. voice, data, video)

Common transport

MobileAccess

CupperAccess

CoaxAccess

Tel

eph

on

y

Dat

a

TV

Objective for 3G LTE:To develop the 3G accessto carry “everything”


Worldwide fixed & mobile active subscriptions Forecast (2003-2010)

(Year -end)

Fixed Broadband(Cable, xDSL,Ethernet)

Fixed (POTS/ISDN)

Mobile

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

No

of S

ubsc

riptio

ns (

Mill

ions

)

Source: Internal Ericsson


Telephony

WWW @

Office

TV

MobileHome

Mobile Triple Play- Telephony, Data and Video/TV delivered by 3G networks


WCDMA performance roadmap

Continuous improvement of data performance

Latency (ms)

Capacity DL (Mbps/5 MHz)

Peak DL (Mbps/5 MHz)

Capacity UL (Mbps/5 MHz)

Peak UL (Mbps/5 MHz)

• 100

• 2.5

• 4.3

• 1

• 0.384

• 75

• 2.5 (4-5)

• 14

• 1-2

• ~2

• 30-50

• 4-5

• 14

• ~2

• 4-6

• 10-15 10

• 4-5* 8-10

• 14* 25

• ~2 4-5

• 4-6 12.5

• HSDPA

• Enh UL• HSDPA Ph2• (GRAKE)

• MBMS• Enh UL Ph2

• 3G LTE

• 150

• 1

• 0.384

• 1

• 0.064

2004 2005

• R99

2006 2007-8 2009

WCDMA OFDM (Targets)

OFDM on 20 MHz gives 100 / 50 Mbps in DL / UL respectively. 2x2 ant. assumed for the DL

* With 2x2 MIMO in DL these numbers will be higher


HSDPA & Enhanced Uplink

for Mobile Broadband

HSDPA & Enhanced Uplink

for Mobile Broadband


25.7% Laptop PC sequential growth rate 2004E

PC Trends

Fast growth

Shifting from householdto personal device

Mobility is built-in

PC is a complement tothe mobile phone

attractive to enterprise and consumer market

Source: forecast by JPMorgan, August 2004

A mobile terminal is not always a mobile phoneThe Personal Computer goes mobile

Desktop, US

Laptop, US

Computer Sales’000

Source: IDC, 2003

Laptop, WE

Desktop, WE

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07


HSDPA and Enhanced UplinkFast and cost efficient Mobile Wireless Access anywhere

Global Standard High volumes, low cost

Reduced Latency Quick response time

Reduced Cost/GByte5 higher system capacity

Lower cost/GByte

High SpeedHigher bit rates:

up to 14 Mbps

Cost Efficient Roll-outSoftware upgrade in existing network


160 BB subs

25 kbit/s dimensioning per user – same as fixed offering

HSDPA

2 HSDPA carriers = 4Mbit/s sector capacity

160 BB subs

160 BB subs

Example

DS

LAM 2x E1

= 4Mbit capacity

160 ADSL subs.

25 kbit/s dimensioning per user* (typical Western Europe)

ADSLExa

mple

End-user Bandwidth Perception is similar between ADSL and HSDPA

Similar bandwidth experience for an ADSL subscriber (left) and a 3G HSDPA subscriber (right)

NB! With G-RAKE receivers the capacity will double to about 320 BB subs per sector


Mobile BroadbandIt’s already happening

Source: Web advertisements, H2 2004


MBMS for Mobile TV

MBMS for Mobile TV


MOBILE PHONES TO REPLACE TV AS PRIME AD MEDIUM

Mobile phones will replace TV as most important medium, says ad agency chiefBy Gary Silverman in London Published: April 7 2005 03:00 | Last updated: April 7 2005 03:00

Mobile telephones and other wireless communication devices will soon become the most important medium for advertisers to reach technology-savvy consumers, one of the world's leading advertising executives said yesterday.

The forecast by Andrew Robertson, chief executive of Omnicom's BBDO advertising agency, the world's third-biggest, underscores the uncertainties facing advertisers in developed markets as they shift from their traditional dependence on television.

Source: Financial Times


Core Network

Channel delivery today

SGSN

GGSN

SGSN


Core Network

Channel delivery via MBMS

SGSN

GGSN

SGSN


Service customization(service differentiation, personalization, etc)

Low (10 channels) High (10K Channels)

Sim

ulta

neo

usl

yre

ach

able

use

rsF

ew(1

50 k

)M

any

(200

M)

Technology options for interactive services

DVB-H or

”Cellular BC”

Unicast UMTS & GSM/GPRS

Schematic diagram

DVB-H ~330 kbps (13.3 Mbps / 40 channels)

DVB-H ~330 kbps (13.3 Mbps / 40 channels)

MBMS/UMTS: 64-256+ kbps

MBMS/GSM: 32-128 kbps

MBMS/UMTS: 64-256+ kbps

MBMS/GSM: 32-128 kbps

UMTS: 64 kb/s (CS), 128 kb/s (PS)GPRS: 30-40 kbps (PS)EDGE: ~ 100 kbps (PS)

UMTS: 64 kb/s (CS), 128 kb/s (PS)GPRS: 30-40 kbps (PS)EDGE: ~ 100 kbps (PS)

Long term 3G evolutionLong term 3G evolution


WCDMA performance roadmap

Continuous improvement of data performance

Latency (ms)

Capacity DL (Mbps/5 MHz)

Peak DL (Mbps/5 MHz)

Capacity UL (Mbps/5 MHz)

Peak UL (Mbps/5 MHz)

• 100

• 2.5

• 4.3

• 1

• 0.384

• 75

• 2.5 (4-5)

• 14

• 1-2

• ~2

• 30-50

• 4-5

• 14

• ~2

• 4-6

• 10-15 10

• 4-5* 8-10

• 14* 25

• ~2 4-5

• 4-6 12.5

• HSDPA

• Enh UL• HSDPA Ph2• (GRAKE)

• MBMS• Enh UL Ph2

•3G LTE

• 150

• 1

• 0.384

• 1

• 0.064

2004 2005

• R99

2006 2007-8 2009

WCDMA OFDM (Targets)

OFDM on 20 MHz gives 100 / 50 Mbps in DL / UL respectively. 2x2 ant. assumed for the DL

* With 2x2 MIMO in DL these numbers will be higher


What is 3G LTE

A step in performance and capabilities– Data rates up to 100 Mbps in local area

– Latency less than 10 ms

– Improved spectrum efficiency

– IP optimized

– Broadcasting

– Spectrum flexibility

Wider carrier bandwidthWider carrier bandwidth based on AML-OFDM based on AML-OFDM (up to 20 (up to 20 MHz, scalable downwards) MHz, scalable downwards)

HSDPA Enhanced UL

WCDMA evolvedWCDMA evolved 4G4G

2013

2006

3G3G ”Super 3G”

2009

New Spectrum2G / 3G Spectrum


3GPP Targets for Evolved UTRAN and UTRAfrom TSG-RAN meeting Athens Dec 2004: 1(2)

Increased data rates• Significantly increased peak data rate e.g. 100 Mbps (downlink) and 50 Mbps (uplink)

• Increase “cell edge bitrate” whilst maintaining same site locations as deployed today

Significantly improved spectrum efficiency ( e.g. 2-4 x Rel6)

Reduced latencies• Possibility for a Radio-access network latency (user-plane UE – RNC (or corresponding node

above Node B) - UE) below 10 ms

• Significantly reduced C-plane latency (e.g. including the possibility to exchange user-plane data starting from camped-state with a transition time of less than 100 ms (excluding downlink paging delay))

Designed for IP traffic• Efficient support of the various types of services, especially from the PS domain (e.g. Voice

over IP, Presence)

Support of further enhanced IMS and core network

Further enhanced MBMS


3GPP Targets for Evolved UTRAN and UTRAfrom TSG-RAN meeting Athens Dec 2004: 2(2)

Spectrum and deployment flexibility• Scaleable bandwidth

• 5, 10, 20 and possibly 15 MHz

• 1.25, 2.5 MHz: to allow flexibility in narrow spectral allocations where the system may be deployed

• Operation in paired and unpaired spectrum should not be precluded

• Possibility for simplified co-existence between operators in adjacent bands as well as cross-border co-existence

Cost effective introduction• Cost effective migration from Rel-6 UTRA radio interface and architecture

• Support for inter-working with existing 3G systems and non-3GPP specified systems

• Backwards compatibility is highly desirable, but the trade off versus performance and/or capability enhancements should be carefully considered.

• Reduced CAPEX and OPEX including backhaul

• Reasonable system and terminal complexity, cost, and power consumption.


Ericsson assumptions for S3G

• OFDM based radio

• S3G radio will support PS bearers only

• Common upper layer protocols between WCMDA PS-domain and S3G• Simplified S3G deployment• Seamless mobility between WCDMA PS-domain and S3G• Only one standard, common for WCDMA PS-domain and S3G, for

the 3GPP evolution

• S3G shall be possible to deploy as a stand-alone system

• Easy migration into all spectrum (e.g GSM) spectrum is essential


• The IP-optimized Layer2 and Layer3 protocols in Super 3G should be applicable also for HSDPA to enable:- Cost efficient roll-out of Super 3G starting in areas with need of high data rate - Efficient hand-off for service continuity between WCDMA/HSDPA and Super 3G- Cost efficient upgrades of existing WCDMA/HSDPA equipment to Super 3G

Cost efficient roll-out of Super 3G by sharing common IP-optimized protocols with WCDMA/HSDPA

WCDMA/HSDPA Coverage

Super 3G coverage

Super 3G coverage

Super 3G coverage

Efficient hand-off for coverage and service continuity


Super 3G is IP optimised for an All IP Network

PublicInternet

CorporateInteranetCorporateInteranet

ISP

HSS IMSBilling

MGw

MSCServer

PSTN

Firewall

Standard IPbased transport

Node B+

Node B+

Node B+

RNC Server

AEN

Other accesse.g. WLAN, ADSL, ...


Approved schedule for a ”3G evolution” SI & WI

20052004 2006 2007

#25

#28

#27

#26

#29

#32

#31

#30

#33

#36

#35

#34

#38

#37

Study Item (SI) period

Work Item (WI) period(Indicative Deadline)


RAN#31, 8-10 March, ChinaRevised work plan Working assumption on complete concept

Channel structure MIMO scheme to be used for

evaluation Signalling procedures Mobility details

RAN#31, 8-10 March, ChinaRevised work plan Working assumption on complete concept

Channel structure MIMO scheme to be used for

evaluation Signalling procedures Mobility details

RAN#30, 30 Nov-2 Dec, MaltaRevised work planRAN Architecture including RAN migration scenariosRadio Interface Protocol ArchitectureStates and state transitionsPhysical Layer Basics

Multiple access schemeMacro-diversity or notRF ScenariosMeasurements

RAN#30, 30 Nov-2 Dec, MaltaRevised work planRAN Architecture including RAN migration scenariosRadio Interface Protocol ArchitectureStates and state transitionsPhysical Layer Basics

Multiple access schemeMacro-diversity or notRF ScenariosMeasurements

RAN#32, 31 May- 2 June, TBDConcept TR for approval

TR having Stage 2 level of details in order for smooth transition to Work Item phase

WIs created and their time plan agreed

RAN#32, 31 May- 2 June, TBDConcept TR for approval

TR having Stage 2 level of details in order for smooth transition to Work Item phase

WIs created and their time plan agreed

RAN#29, 21-23 Sept, TallinRevised work planRAN-CN functional split agreed

RAN-CN migration scenarios included

RAN#29, 21-23 Sept, TallinRevised work planRAN-CN functional split agreed

RAN-CN migration scenarios included

RAN #27, 9-11 March, Tokyo•Work plan agreed•TR Structure agreed•1st list of requirements

RAN #27, 9-11 March, Tokyo•Work plan agreed•TR Structure agreed•1st list of requirements

RAN #28, 1-3 June, Quebec•Revised Work plan•Requirement TR approved

deployment scenarios includedrequirements on migration scenarios included

RAN #28, 1-3 June, Quebec•Revised Work plan•Requirement TR approved

deployment scenarios includedrequirements on migration scenarios included

Mar Apr May Jun MarJul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

2005 2006

JunApr May

RAN Study Item Milestones


Summary

• An important aspect of an NGN network is a multi-capable access

• Mobile systems are already evolving to have the capability to cater for Mobile Triple Play

• Voice already today• HSDPA and Enhanced UL for “ADSL” access to internet• HSDPA and MBMS for mobile TV

• 3G Long Term Evolution ensures the specification of a multi-capable access that is capable of carrying a wide range of different types of traffic also in the beyond 2010 time frame


1 Open Workshop on NGN, Brussels, June 22, 2005 © Copyright Ericsson AB 2005. All right reserved. 3G RAN Long Term Evolution alias Super 3G alias S3G NB!:

Documents

copyright ericsson ab

open workshop

mobile tv slide

mobile broadband slide

internal ericsson slide

mobile desktop

higher slide

mobile telephones