Top Banner
1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University
71

1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

Dec 25, 2015

Download

Documents

Judith Lynch
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

1

On Non-CoherenceJohn Law

Centre for Science StudiesLancaster University

Page 2: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

2

Burnside Farm

• Discovered 19th February, 2001

• Spread through sheep into the market system

• 70 premises• National epidemic• 2030 infected premises

• £3bn cleanup costs

Page 3: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

3

FMD 31st March

Page 4: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

4

Introduction …

1. Messy: patchwork of practices

2. Difficult to narrate!

3. Political: stories perform realities/politics (innocence!?)

4. Question: what reality to make? … ontological politics

Page 5: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

5

Outline

1. Two smooth summary stories: – Globalisation– foot & mouth UK

2. Commentary on literary & political work being done here

3. Patch in other stories to disrupt smoothness (a pinboard)

4. Conclusion: about ontological politics, story-telling, mess!

Page 6: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

6

Story 1: Global Narrative

Page 7: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

7

FMD Clinical Symptoms

What is it?

Productivity

Page 8: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

8

‘The capacity of buffalo herds to work during rice planting is halved, and milk yields decrease by 80%. When endemic, infections often occur serially with some herds falling ill three times a year. The livelihoods of families that depend on animals for food and power can be severely affected.,

Bangladesh….

Page 9: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

9

FMD World Map 1996-2000

Page 10: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

10

FMD World Map 2003

Page 11: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

11

Why is this important?

Page 12: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

12

OIE Classification

1. disease free without (routine) vaccination;

2. disease free with vaccination3. disease endemic

• Potentially disastrous for exporting countries

• At the same time, it spreads

Page 13: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

13

Pan Asia O Serotype, 1990

Page 14: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

14

Pan Asia O Serotype, 1995

Page 15: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

15

Pan Asia O Serotype, 1998

Page 16: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

16

Pan Asia O Serotype, 2001

Page 17: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

17

Narratives & Performativity1. Stories order the world (not simply

descriptions)2. Our stories order the world

(performativity)3. Our stories aren’t politically innocent

(we are making a difference: no choice; strengthening/weakening realities)

4. What reality to help to make more real? (= ‘ontological politics’)

Page 18: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

18

Global FMD Narrative makes …

1. Geographical & geopolitical reality

2. Boundary between disease & disease-free countries

3. Boundary between productive/less productive agriculture

4. Powerful WTO rules

Page 19: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

19

My Global FMD Narrative makes smooth reality ….

1. Single global space

2. Single time

3. Single objects in time and space

4. Makes some events/actors important and others not

5. Describes a system of exclusions/ vulnerabilities within that time/spae

Page 20: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

20

Good, fine, true, but is this what we want to do?

Criticism? Does it re-perform the conditions that frame dominance?

Page 21: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

21

Story 2: UK National Narrative

Page 22: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

22

The strategy?

1. Stop the animal movements

2. Kill infected animals and kill them

3. Trace and kill animals in contact

4. Disinfect the premises

5. Take biosecurity measures close by

Page 23: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

23

Page 24: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

24

Page 25: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

25

FMD Disinfectant

Page 26: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

26

FMD Stonehenge

Page 27: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

27

Page 28: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

28

F&M Pyre

Page 29: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

29

Headline

Page 30: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

30

FMD: the Army

Page 31: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

31

FMD Great Orton

Page 32: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

32

Opening theCountryside

Page 33: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

33

National FMD Narrative

1. Discovery and Initial Strategy

2. Mounting Crisis

3. Fight back

4. Endgame

Page 34: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

34

National FMD NarrativeAssumptions

1. Space-time box, linear & progressive time (UK state apparatus)

2. Events/actors in box

3. Importance of actors

4. Discretionary agency for the state

Page 35: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

35

National FMD Narrative

1. Specific

2. Makes strategic, state-centred struggle

3. Makes disease fit for policy makers

Alternative narratives?

Is this what we should be doing?

Page 36: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

36

Smooth stories

1. Single worlds?

2. Or non-coherent worlds?

Practically: lots of things didn’t fit anyway

Which (do we want to enact?

Performativity!

Ontological politics!

Page 37: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

37

Metaphors/techniques to break up grand narrative: to perform something different?

Page 38: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

38

Possibilities …

• Museum collections

• Art exhibitions

• Elements in a landscape

• The rooms in a house

• Images streaming across a screen

• Multiple computer windows

Page 39: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

39

Possibilities …• Blogs• Web-pages• Meetings• Poetry, performance

• Think imaginatively about mess!

• On this occasion: a messy pinboard!

Page 40: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

40

FMD Pinboard

Page 41: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

41

Looking for other narratives …

… important in other locations

Page 42: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

42

Story 3: A trading narrative?

Page 43: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

43

The buzzhad gone

‘The buzz had gone … snuffed out like a candle – the mart’s car parks (were) empty of farmers and their vehicles … the rings (were) empty of auctioneers and their vendors and buyers together with the livestock they were trading, the offices (were) empty of clerks and their customers …’

Page 44: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

44

Livestock Market, Abergavenny

Page 45: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

45

Trading

FMD is social isolation, loss of income

Space: network of contacts

Time: a weekly cycle

Page 46: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

46

Story 4: A farming narrative?

Page 47: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

47

Families tended to become confined

‘… families tended to become confined. Children were sent to stay away or kept off school. Diversified off farm businesses were closed or kept in operation by the ‘away posting’ of one member of the family. Visits to family, friends or social venues virtually came to a standstill.’

Page 48: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

48

Farming

FMD: social isolation, fear

Space: network of social contacts

Time: cyclic, daily, weekly, monthly

Page 49: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

49

Story 5: Killing?

Page 50: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

50

But don’t get mewrong…

‘But don’t get me wrongI have now seen plenty of this plagueAnd it is no common cold.The animals suffer horribly, as the skin of their tongues peels offAnd their feet fall apart.We must try to kill them quick and clean,As soon as it appears in a herd or a flock.’

Page 51: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

51

Page 52: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

52

Killing

FMD: clinical attitude

Space/time: embodied skills, love, detachment, local care and killing

Page 53: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

53

Story 6: burning?

Page 54: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

54

Burning

‘The flames turned the night sky orange, the stench of burning flesh – no wonder the talk in the country is of apocalypse’‘It is, to be sure, a mediaeval image, those piles of animal corpses being put to the flame – the pictures in the papers looking more and more like tapestries than photographs.’ (Guardian)

Page 55: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

55

FMD Pyre

Page 56: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

56

FMD Pyre

Page 57: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

57

Burning

FMD: mediaeval sacrifice, pestilence

Space: collapses into the pyres at the end of the world

Time: ending, apocalypse, expression of fate, moment of judgement

Page 58: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

58

Story 7: farming silence?

Page 59: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

59

Mornings came and days went by

‘Mornings came and days went by without the need to think of animals being fed, or checked for lameness or looking poorly. We had a silence around us, a dog with no work. Hay silage and straw with nothing to feed or bed. ’

Page 60: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

60

Silence

Page 61: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

61

Silence

FMD: has killed the farm

Space/time: locally embodied, daily, inseparable from material context, mundane absences

Page 62: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

62

Story 8: A story of walking and spirituality

Page 63: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

63

Few … have looked

‘Few … (commentators) have looked at what I can only call the spiritual consequences. For hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, [walking] is an escape from regimentation. They have lost the right to roam. They are being told that the slaughter of … sheep will transform the open [hills] of the Lake District into a scrubland no one who has loved Wordsworth … will recognise …’

Page 64: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

64

Walking

Page 65: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

65

Walking

FMD: bodily and spiritual constraint

Space: openness, freedom,

Time: disappears, (timeless appreciation of nature, spiritual communion)

Page 66: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

66

Eight patches on the pinboard

• Globalisation• Government strategies and policies• The market• Isolation on the farm• Veterinary Care• Burning• Silence on the farm• Walking

Page 67: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

67

Eight kinds of space & time

Global international trading movements

State nation progressive

Market local networks cyclic

Farm social relations cyclic

Vet embodied momentary

Pyre end of space end of time

Walking no limits outside time

Page 68: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

68

Concluding… • Narratives tell differently

• Narratives also enact differently

• Do we want FMD singular? Or FMD multiple?

• FMD as a set of interferences between enactments

• FMD instability, fluidity, otherness (like ALD)

Page 69: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

69

….• Ontological politics (style and

choice of narrative): what kind of a world to make?

• Responsibility!

Page 70: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

70

Method?• Reality enacting as incredibly

difficult! (holding materials, audiences together, circulating, including)

• FMD smooth or FMD mess?

• Don’t we need a messy method to understand/enact mess?

Page 71: 1 On Non-Coherence John Law Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University.

71