Top Banner
1 North American Energy Standards Board North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010
27

1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Mar 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Katelyn Barr
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

1

North American Energy Standards BoardNorth American Energy Standards Board

Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations

for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09

NAESB Board Meeting

June 24, 2010

Page 2: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Topics Topics

Acknowledgement History and Background Where we are? Overview of PAP 03, 04, 09

Recommendations What is Next?

2

Page 3: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

AcknowledgementAcknowledgement

Since August 2009, many people have been involved in the development of NAESB Recommendations for NIST PAP 03, 04 & 09. The NAESB Smart Grid Task Force and NAESB Staff would like to thank everybody who has contributed to the this effort, and would welcome continued support and participation.

We would also like to thank ISO/RTO Council (IRC), UCAiug OpenSG OpenADR task force, EPRI, NIST, OASIS, FIX Protocol, CalConnect, and other organizations that provided support to NAESB on this effort.

3

Page 4: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

History & Background History & Background

August 2009, NAESB took on the responsibility of developing use cases and requirements for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09:

PAP03: Common Price Communication Model; PAP04: Common Scheduling Mechanism; PAP09: Standard DR and DER Signals

NAESB formed Smart Grid Task Force (SGTF) to start working on the three PAPs

A working paper – Framework for Integrated DR and DER Models - was first developed to help set the context for the requirements development thereafter;

The PAP09 effort was split into two recommendations, one for wholesale and one for retail;

Common terms & definitions as well as the entity relationship model were developed as a way to harmonize and ensure consistency across all three PAPs recommendations.

Recently, NAESB was also identified by NIST as the SDO to standardize the Energy Usage Information Model – PAP 10, and has formed a Working Group accordingly.

4

Page 5: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Where We Are?Where We Are?

5

Page 6: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Overview of the PAPs 03,04 & 09 Overview of the PAPs 03,04 & 09 RecommendationsRecommendations

Common Definitions Entity Relationship Model PAP03: Common Price Communication

Model; PAP04: Common Scheduling Mechanism; PAP09: Standard DR and DER Signals

Wholesale Recommendations Retail Recommendations

6

Page 7: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Common DefinitionsCommon Definitions

7

Term DefinitionBusiness Entity The wholesale or retail entity that interacts with other entities in its market.Communication Method The method by which an object communicates with another object to instruct, measure, report or control.

Control The role associated with the control of an End Device.Designated Dispatch Entity (DDE) A role which carries the responsibility of receiving and processing demand resource dispatch instructions or market information and

(optionally) providing response information. Distributed Energy Resources (DER) DERs are small, modular, energy generation and storage technologies that provide electric capacity or energy where it is needed. DERs

may be either connected to the local electric power grid (e.g., for voltage support) or isolated from the grid in stand-alone applications, such as part of a MicroGrid. Definition of DER provided by the Department of Energy, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/31570.pdf

End Device (ED) A physical end-use device that consumes or supplies electricity.Environmental Authority (EA) A regulatory authority responsible for the development, reporting and enforcement of environmental activities.

Federal Regulator (FR) A federal regulatory authority.Load Serving Entity (LSE) A role which carries the responsibility of serving end-users and selling electric energy to end-users.

Local Authority (LA) A regulatory authority responsible for the oversight and administration of utility service-related functions within its jurisdiction.

Market Enrollment The collection of enrollment or tariff data for a Resource Object to provide a specific market product or service.

Market Participant (MP) An organization registered with the System Operator that may take on roles such as SP, LSE, TDSP, DDE, SE, and/or MA in accordance with the SO’s market rules.

Measurement The role associated with the device or algorithm that measures the consumption or supply of an End Device.

Meter Authority (MA) A role which carries the responsibility of providing data necessary to determine the performance of a Resource.

P-Node The price location of the Premise in the transmission and/or distribution network.Participant The entity that represents resources to a market or distribution operator.Premise The location at which connection to the transmission or distribution system is made.Regulator A rule-making and enforcement entity.Response Method A measurable action taken in response to an instruction to change consumption.Response Method Aggregation (RMA)

A logical entity that has a reportable interval level consumption, e.g. an RMA may be a physical entity with its own meter, a neighborhood of homes that has a net meter, or an estimate of consumption of an aggregation of retail customers.

Resource A market-dependent group of Response Method Aggregations that represents a dispatchable entity.

Resource Object Physical and logical types of demand response resource objects.Scheduling Entity(SE) A role which carries the responsibility of submitting bids/offers and receives schedules and awards.

Service Provider (SP) A role which carries the responsibility of coordinating resources to deliver electricity products and services to a market or distribution operator.

State Regulator (SR) A regulatory authority responsible for the oversight and administration of electric utilities.Supporting Objects Objects that support the interaction of Business Entities and Resource Objects.Transmission/Distribution Service Provider (TDSP)

A role which carries the responsibility of operating a local electricity transmission and/or distribution system.

Utility Customer (UC) An end-use customer of the Utility Distribution Operator that takes on roles such as Premise or Resource.

Utility Distribution Operator (UDO) An entity which carries the responsibility of operating an electricity distribution system.Zone A physical or electrical region.

Page 8: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Entity Relationship ModelEntity Relationship Model

8

Supporting Objects4. Resource Objects1. Regulators 2. Business Entities 3. Participant Roles

1.1 Federal

1.2 Reliability

1.3 Environmental

1.4 State

2.1 System Operator

(SO)

2.3 Utility Distribution

Operator (UDO)

3.1 Service Provider (SP)

3.2 Load Serving Entity(LSE)

3.3 Scheduling Entity (SE)

3.4 Designated Dispatch Entity

(DDE)

3.5 Transmission/Distribution

Service Provider (TDSP)

3.6 Meter Authority (MA)

1.5 Municipal,

Cooperative, or other utility

Authority

4.3Premise

4.2Response Method

Aggregation

4.1Resource

5.4Zone

5.6P-Node

5.1Measurement

5.2Control

5.5 Communication

Method(CM)

5.3Enrollment

2.4 Utility Customer

(UC)

Takes on one or more Resource roles

WH

OLE

SALE

TER

MS

RETA

IL T

ERM

S

4.5End Device

4.4Response Method

Exactly One

One or More

Zero or One

Zero or More

2.2 Market Participant

(MP)

Takes on one or more Participant

roles

Page 9: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

PAP 03 RecommendationsPAP 03 Recommendations

The recommendation deals exclusively with the pricing related requirements at both the wholesale and retail levels. The requirements are captured in the form of UML models, where business requirements are captured in use case narrative format and data requirements are captured in tabular format. The main use cases that are affected by pricing are:

Demand Response Non-Price (Environmental) Response Load-follower Price-takers

Reliability based responses, both wholesale and retail, is addressed by PAP-09 on DR Signaling.

The purpose of the recommendation is to capture business and data requirements related to the definition of a common model for capturing the attributes of an electricity product offered at wholesale and/or retail level. Such attributes will mainly include but are not limited to the pricing information of the product being offered to the end consumers of electricity.

9

Page 10: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Pricing Related Use CasesPricing Related Use Cases

10

Publish Settled Price

Publish Wholesale Price

Bidding

Receive

Price-takers

Publish Retail Price

Consume and React to Price Information

Non-Price (Environmental)

Response

Load Follower

Demand Response

«invokes»

«precedes» «precedes»

«precedes»

Publish Settled Price

Publish Wholesale Price

Bidding

Receive

Price-takers

Publish Retail Price

Consume and React to Price Information

Non-Price (Environmental)

Response

Load Follower

Demand Response

«invokes»

«precedes» «precedes»

«precedes»

uc Pricing Use Case

Page 11: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Tariff Rate TypesTariff Rate Types

11

Tariff Rate Type Target Customers Descriptionblock rate C&I, residential An energy supply rate structure in which the per unit energy price

increases or decreases for each successive block of energy consumed.

critical peak price C&I, residential A pricing structure in which the customer receives notification identifying a time interval, (“critical hours”) during which special higher prices apply over and above whatever other rate they may be charged.   Critical hours generally represent a small percentage of the hours in the year.

demand rate Mainly for C&I customers, pilot for residential customers

A component of an energy supply rate structure based on the highest demand for electricity measured in a billing period.

day ahead market rate C&I, residential An energy supply rate structure, typically hourly, based on the day-ahead wholesale market price.

market clearing price for energy

C&I An energy rate structure that allows for price changes every interval (e.g. 5 minutes, 15 minutes, hourly, etc.) based on real-time wholesale market prices.

peak time rebate C&I, residential An incentive rate in which the utility pays a rebate to customers who reduced demand during peak periods on critical days

real time price rate C&I An energy supply rate structure in which prices can vary, typically on an hourly basis, based on forecast (day-ahead) or actual (real-time) market conditions.

time of use rate C&I, residential An energy supply rate structure where the per unit charge (kWh or kW) varies according to the time of day. Time of use rates may have daily and seasonal variations.

variable peak pricing C&I, residential An energy supply rate structure that combines features of time of use and real time price structures to include the flexibility of market price variation and the fixed time periods of a time of use rate.

Page 12: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Product IdentificationProduct Identification

12

Attribute Description Considerations Product Identifier Energy, although largely a non-storable

and transitory commodity, is nonetheless still a tradable and sellable entity. Any commodity benefits from having a unique identifier (external) that can unambiguously be used by consumers to identify what it is that they are purchasing.

Examples of product identification scheme used in the financial world is the ISIN and stock ticker symbols used by exchanges.

This not a transaction identifier – this would be an industry agreed upon identifier for a particular energy product offering.

Identifier Source Identification of the source of the Product Identifier.

In most systems there are competing or alternative product identification schemes. The Identifier Source references the product identification scheme for the Product Identifier.

Product Type A product type. Attempt to fit the product type within already in place ontologies or product classifications used within industry for trading energy.

Product Sub-Type The sub-type of product Products may be further divided into subtypes, for example reserve products may be 10-minute or 30-minute response.

Unit of Measure for Product

Unit of measure the product. The unit of measure such as MWh or kWh.

Page 13: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Pricing AttributesPricing Attributes

13

Attribute Description ConsiderationsTotal Price Total Price of the product at

point of deliveryPrice is expressed as currency per unit of measure, i.e. quantity is not required, e.g. $/MWh

The sum of all Price Components must equal the Total Price.Set of 1..n Price Components

Price Component A component of the price. Price may have one or more components. Price Component Type

The type of Price Component A standard set of price component types shall be enumerated, such as:

Wholesale electricity cost

Transmission costs

Distribution costsPrice Type Type of price A standard set of price types will need to be defined real time, 5 minute, day

ahead, as examples for price types Override Unit of Measure for the Product

Unit of measure which is used to determine the price

Alternative unit of measure used in calculating the price.

Currency Economic unit of exchange in which the total price and price components are stated (i.e. dollars, euros)

Currency is required to determine the units of measure of the Total Price and Price Components. The energy units of measure are defined by the Product Type.

Time and Interval Interval of energy delivery Timezone conventions and use need to be unambiguously defined.

Daily blocks, hourly markets, 5 minute markets.

A decision in how basic product information will reference and interact with the WS-Calendar initiative being completed as part of PAP-04.

Source Location Identifier Location of the source of the electric energy

Electric energy cost and value are greatly impacted by the distance between generation and consumption. Indicating the source of the generation is important in terms of pricing decisions on part of consumers and intermediaries.

The use of source location would mainly be used for bilateral transactions.Source Location Identifier Type

Type of location. The mechanism used to identify location can be defined in multiple sources based upon specific usage from control areas to GPS coordinates it is anticipated that there may need to be more than one method to identify a geographical location.

Where possible existing industry standards should be adopted to identify geographic locations.

Page 14: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

PAP 04 RecommendationsPAP 04 Recommendations

The recommendation contains a set of requirements relating to the use of date and time based data elements that are used in transactions for Demand Response programs. This information is being provided to NIST in order to aid in the development of a standard representation for date/time based data elements derived from an XML representation of iCalendar.

 Although there are many other areas where date/time based data elements are used in energy industry transactions this recommendation is limited in scope to only those date/time based data elements that are utilized in Demand Response programs.

 The purpose of this action is to define the requirements for standard communication of date, time, schedule, and interval by smart grid actors, with particular attention to DR.

14

Page 15: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Representative Data RequirementsRepresentative Data Requirements

15

Type of Representation Representative Instance Sample Data

Absolute date/time Effective start date

Effective start date and time

2009-11-01

2009-11-01T01:00:00-Z

Absolute Periods (range) Deployment Period 2009-11-01T01:00:00-Z/ 2009-11-02T24:00:00-Z

Relative date/time (time-point) Reduction Deadline 30 minutes from a specified point in time

Recurring date/time Market Closing Every day at 12:00 noon

Absolute Interval Meter Data RecordingInterval

System Frequency

Every 5 minutes

60 cycles per second

Absolute Duration Outage Duration

Minimum Run Time

2 days

4 hours

Page 16: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

PAP 09 Wholesale RecommendationsPAP 09 Wholesale Recommendations

The business process flows and use cases contained in this recommendation address the requirements for standardizing the information exchanged during interactions between the System Operator and various Market Participants for the administration and deployment of demand response resources in organized wholesale electric markets.

Common terminology from the NAESB Measurement and Verification Standards for Demand Response has been incorporated into the development of the business process flows and use cases. As a result of the development of this document, a standard set of actors and additional terminology will expand the existing NAESB documentation of associated terms and definitions for demand response.

16

Page 17: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Guiding PrinciplesGuiding Principles

Demand Response practices must be consistent with NERC and applicable regional reliability authority requirements.

All involved entities are registered through the applicable ISO/RTO market participant registration process, which may include credit checks. However, the specifics related to the business processes associated with registration are not documented in these requirements.

Settlement input parameters are defined as an output to the measurement and performance business process. However, specific business processes associated with settlements are not documented in these requirements.

Intra-system operator information exchanges and specific system operators market rules, calculations, algorithms, and Performance Evaluation models are excluded.

Planning functions are not documented in these requirements. This includes, but is not limited to, long-term load forecasting and transmission planning.

Capacity auctions, awards processes, and resource certification are not documented in these requirements.

References in these Recommendations to “Dispatch”, “Markets”, and “Reliability”, are made relative to Demand Response and apply to Demand Response resources only, not to Generation resources.

Compliance standards for Demand Response resources are determined by the market rules of the respective system operator and are specific to the product or service and the reliability need being addressed. 17

Page 18: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Actor RolesActor Roles

18

Term Actor ID

Designated Dispatch Entity 3.4

Load Serving Entity 3.2

Meter Authority 3.6

Scheduling Entity 3.3

Service Provider 3.1

System Operator 2.1

Transmission/Distribution Service Provider

3.5

Page 19: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Use Case Dimensions and Sample Use Case Dimensions and Sample ListList

19

Product  

Energy (Economic) E

Energy (Reliability) R

Capacity C

Reserve V

Regulation G

Deployment  

Bulk B

Resource R

Self SPerformance Evaluation

 

Baseline 1

MB/MA 2

MBL 3

MGO 4

UseCase

Product DeploymentPerformance

Evaluation

E-R-1 Energy (Economic) Resource BaselineE-R-2 Energy (Economic) Resource MB/MAE-R-3 Energy (Economic) Resource MBLE-R-4 Energy (Economic) Resource MGOE-S-1 Energy (Economic) Self BaselineE-S-2 Energy (Economic) Self MB/MAE-S-3 Energy (Economic) Self MBLE-S-4 Energy (Economic) Self MGO

Page 20: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Wholesale Demand Response Process Wholesale Demand Response Process FlowFlow

20

Measurement & Performance

Enrollment & Qualification

Scheduling & Award Notification

Settlements

Deployment & Real-time

Communications

Start

End

Market Participant Registration

Page 21: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Specific Use Case Example – Specific Use Case Example – Enrollment and QualificationEnrollment and Qualification

21

Demand Response - Enrollment & Qualification

Sch

edul

ing

Ent

ity (

SE

)S

ervi

ce P

rovi

der

(SP

)M

eter

Aut

horit

y (M

A)

Load

Ser

ving

E

ntity

(LS

E)

Tra

nsm

issi

on/

Dis

trib

utio

n S

ervi

ce

Pro

vide

r (T

DS

P)

Sys

tem

Ope

rato

r (S

O)

Approved Enrollment

End

Process EnrollmentRequest

Submit Facility and Resource Enrollment Request

Start

Approved Enrollment

Qualification Required

Finalize Enrollment

Approve Enrollment

Rejection Details

Approved Enrollment

Enrollment/Qualification Status Message

Qualified

Qualification Status

Qualification Rejection

Verify Enrollment

Verify Enrollment

Verify Enrollment

TDSP Enrollment Subset

LSE Enrollment Subset

MA Enrollment Subset

Evaluate Enrollment

MA Enrollment Verification

LSE Enrollment Verification

TDSP Enrollment Verification

(Approval Status)

Enrollment Request

End

End

End

Enrollment/Qualification Status Message to SE

Enrollment/Qualification Status Message to MA

Enrollment/Qualification Status Message to LSE

Enrollment/Qualification Status Message to TDSP

Coordinate, Perform, and

Evaluate Qualification

Activity Diagram ConventionsMessaging - The source of the message is depicted by the message text description swimlane location, the arrow depicts the message destination.

Process out of scope

Process in scope

Predefined Process in scope

Primary Data Flow (Message in Scope)

Optional Primary Data Flow (Message in Scope)

Secondary Data Flow (Message out of Scope)

Optional Secondary Data Flow (Message out of Scope)Decision

Iterative Process

Process Steps Specific Use Case

Verify Enrollment

SE Enrollment Subset

SE Enrollment Verification

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

End

Page 22: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

PAP 09 Retail RecommendationsPAP 09 Retail Recommendations

The purpose of the following is to capture business and data requirements for Retail Level DR signals between entities that controls and manages the DR programs and entities that provide demand response with DR resources and assets. The top level use cases for retail DR are:

Administrate DR Program Administrate Customer for DR Administrate DR Resource Execute DR Event Post DR Event Management

In the context of this report, Distributed Energy Resources (DER) are dispatchable energy generation and storage technologies, typically up to ten MWs in size, that are interconnected to the distribution grid to provide electric capacity and/or energy to a customer or a group of customers and potentially export the excess to the grid for economical purposes. DER is considered in this recommendation only within the context of Demand Response.

22

Page 23: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

DR/DER Framework Key FindingsDR/DER Framework Key Findings

DR signals standardization must support all four market types; i.e. regions with a) no open wholesale and retail competition, b) open wholesale market only, c) open retail market only, d) open wholesale and retail competition. It must also consider key differences that exist and will continue to exist in all four market types.

Wholesale market DR and pricing signals have different characteristics than retail market DR and pricing signals, although commonality in format is feasible.

Most Customers (with a few exception of Commercial and Industrial (C&I) Customers will not interact directly with wholesale market when it comes to DR and pricing signals.

Retail pricing models are complex, due to the numerous tariff rate structures that exist in both regulated and un-regulated markets. Attempts to standardize DR control and pricing signals must not hinder regulatory changes or market innovations when it comes to future tariff or pricing models.

New business entities (Energy Service Providers (ESP), Demand Response Providers (DRP), DR Aggregators, and Energy Information Service Providers (ESIP)) will play an increasing role in DR implementation.

DER will play an increasingly important role in DR, yet the development of tariff and/or pricing models that support DER’s role in DR is still in its infancy.

The Customer’s perspective and ability to react to DR control and pricing signals must be a key driver during the development of DR standards. 23

Page 24: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Retail DR Use Case OverviewRetail DR Use Case Overview

24

uc DR Use Cases Ov erv iew Diagram (simple)

(from 5.0 Post DR Event Management)

5.0 Post DR Ev ent Management

(from 4.0 Execute DR Event)

4.0 Execute DR Ev ent

(from 3.0 Administrate DR Resource)

3.0 Administrate DR Resource

(from 2.0 Administrate Customer for DR)

2.0 Administrate Customer for DR

(from 1.0 Administrate DR Program)

1.0 Administrate DR Program

«precedes»

«precedes»

«precedes»

«precedes»

Note: the details of UC 1.0 and 2.0 are outside the scope of this recommendation.

Page 25: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Use Case – Administrate DR ResourceUse Case – Administrate DR Resource

25

uc 3.0 Administrate DR Resource

3.0 Administrate DR Resource

3.2 Administrate Distribution DR Resource

3.2.1 Update DR Resource

3.2.2 Register DR Resource

3.2.3 Remov e DR Resource

3.2.5 Administrate DER for DR Purpose

3.3 DR Bidding3.2.4 Administrate DR Asset (Direct)

3.2.4.1 Register DR Asset

3.2.4.2 Update DR Asset

3.4.2.3 Remov e DR Asset

3.3.1 Retail DR Bid to Supply (Offers) 3.3.2 DR Bid to Buy

Serv ice Prov ider

(from Actors)

«include»«extend»

«include» «include» «include»

«extend» «extend»

«include»

«include»

«include»

Page 26: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

Use Case – Execute DR EventUse Case – Execute DR Event

26

uc Execute DR Ev ent

4.0 Execute DR Ev ent

4.2 Notify DR Ev ent (Retail)

4.6 Dispatch DR Instructions (Retail)

4.4 Broadcast DR Message (Price Plus

Information)

4.7 DR Direct Load Control (Retail)

Serv ice Prov ider

(from Actors)

Resource

(from Actors)

4.8 DR Ev ent Execution

4.9 Operational Coordinations «include»

«invokes»«invokes»

Page 27: 1 North American Energy Standards Board Overview of NAESB SGTF Recommendations for NIST PAPs 03, 04 & 09 NAESB Board Meeting June 24, 2010.

What is Next?What is Next?

NAESB SGTF Phase II Effort: Develop a consolidated and harmonized set of data

requirements across PAPs 03, 04 and 09 Wholesale and Retail. This is to provide further details behind the current

recommendations of three PAPs with the intent to make the whole set of recommendations more actionable by the regulatory and users community.

NAESB SGTF announced the formation of PAP10 WG. Formation of the WG and its leadership team with broad

participation; Developed a high level plan to get the Energy Usage Information

Model standard completed in six months.

Continued to look for opportunities to develop Smart Grid standards that are of great value to its members.

27