1 Mid-America Earthquake Center Optimizing Temporary Housing Optimizing Temporary Housing Arrangements after Disasters Arrangements after Disasters Omar El-Anwar Doctoral Researcher Construction Management Civil and Env. Engineering Dept. University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 November 8, 2007
22
Embed
1 Mid-America Earthquake Center Optimizing Temporary Housing Arrangements after Disasters Omar El-Anwar Doctoral Researcher Construction Management Civil.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Mid-America Earthquake Center
Optimizing Temporary Housing Optimizing Temporary Housing Arrangements after DisastersArrangements after Disasters
Omar El-AnwarDoctoral Researcher Construction ManagementCivil and Env. Engineering Dept. University of IllinoisUrbana, IL 61801
November 8, 2007
2
Mid-America Earthquake Center
Outline
Introduction Interface with MAEVis Output Mock-ups
3
Mid-America Earthquake Center
Motivation
Housing is the single greatest component of all losses in terms of economic value and in terms of buildings damaged. (Comerio 1997a)
Hurricane KatrinaAssistance Provided
947,848 Housing Assistance
680,586 Rental Assistance
121,922 Trailers/Mobile Homes
Hurricane KatrinaAssistance Provided
947,848 Housing Assistance
680,586 Rental Assistance
121,922 Trailers/Mobile Homes
Destroyed or severely
damaged units
Total number of damaged
housing unitsDisaster
36,000112,000Hurricane Hugo (1989)
11,50043,000Loma Prieta (1989)
80,000135,000Hurricane Andrew (1992)
60,000500,000Northridge (1994)
Destroyed or severely
damaged units
Total number of damaged
housing unitsDisaster
36,000112,000Hurricane Hugo (1989)
11,50043,000Loma Prieta (1989)
80,000135,000Hurricane Andrew (1992)
60,000500,000Northridge (1994)
(Comerio 1997)
4
Mid-America Earthquake Center
Problem Statement
There is a need for a multi-objective optimization methodology
5
Mid-America Earthquake Center
Research Objectives
1. MinimizeSocioeconomic
Disruption
1.1 Displacement distance from preferred location
1.2 Housing quality
1.3 Delivery time
1.4 Location capacity
Healthcare support
Economical opportunities
Educational needs
Safety requirements
4. MinimizePublic
Expenditures
3. MinimizeEnvironmental
Impact
3.1 Geology and soils
3.2 Water quality
3.3 Air quality
Others …
2. MaximizePublicSafety
2.1 Hazardous geographic locations
2.2 Hazardous geographic areas
6
Mid-America Earthquake Center
Model Implementation
LP_SolveLinear Programming
Open Source Libraries
7
Mid-America Earthquake Center
Outline
Introduction Interface with MAEVis Output Mock-ups
8
Mid-America Earthquake Center
9
Mid-America Earthquake Center
Outline
Introduction Interface with MAEVis Output Mock-ups