1 Lightwaves at the end of the telecom Lightwaves at the end of the telecom tunnel? tunnel? Yves Poppe Dir. IP Strategy Nordunet Annual Conference Reykjavik, August 24 th 2003
Dec 14, 2015
1
Lightwaves at the end of the telecom Lightwaves at the end of the telecom tunnel?tunnel?
Yves Poppe
Dir. IP Strategy
Nordunet Annual Conference
Reykjavik, August 24th 2003
2
AgendaAgenda
Evolution of Transoceanic Internet Capacity Demand and Supply
Aftermath of the Great Telecom Storm
The R&E World Sees More and More Light
Next (Light)wave of Opportunities
3
The pitfalls of predictions and forecastsThe pitfalls of predictions and forecasts
4
In October 1994 Teleglobe and its partners In October 1994 Teleglobe and its partners inaugurated Cantat-3 with two fiber pairs, inaugurated Cantat-3 with two fiber pairs,
capacity of 5 gigabit (2x2.5Gb) linking capacity of 5 gigabit (2x2.5Gb) linking Canada to the UK, Germany, Denmark, Canada to the UK, Germany, Denmark,
Iceland and the Faroe IslandsIceland and the Faroe Islands..
Doubled the capacity under the AtlanticDoubled the capacity under the Atlantic155mb was earmarked for data155mb was earmarked for data
Engineering estimated 17years to fill the cableEngineering estimated 17years to fill the cable
5
Cantat-3 and R&E 1995-1998Cantat-3 and R&E 1995-1998
Lake Cowichan
KDD/NTT ATM R&DNetwork(JAPAN)
Ibaraki, Japan
45 Mb/s (in trial)
TeleglobeATM TestNetwork
SIRIUSATM Network
(ITALY)
RENATERATM Network
(FRANCE)
DTATM Network
SWITCH(Switzerland)
SprintATM Network
(US)
STARTAP(Chicago)
Iceland PTTATM Network
Berkom
B-WIN(DFN)
SuperJANETATM Network
(UK)
155 Mb/s CT-3
JAMES
45Mb/s
155 Mb/s CT-3
45Mb/s
MCI vBNSNetwork
CANARIECA-Net-2Network
(CANADA)
45Mb/s
183
45Mb/s
34 Mb/s
34Mb/s
34Mb/s
34Mb/s
34Mb/s
34Mb/s
45Mb/s
45Mb/s
Vancouver.BC
Montreal
Pennant Point
6
How Reality Turned Out to Look LikeHow Reality Turned Out to Look Like
The internet tsunami took everybody by surprise. Cantat-3 was full in less than 3 years. The magic potion of DWDM : five years later cables of 1000 times
the capacity of Cantat-3 were being installed. Deregulation, easy access to capital, advances in laser and fiber
technology and spectacular internet growth created a new generation of global cable builders: Global Crossing, Level3, FLAG , 360networks and resulted in a cornucopia of transmission capacity.
R&E transatlantic connectivity : from kb/sec to meg/s to gig/sec in less than 10 years
After 3-4 years of spectacular growth, a peak in early 2000 and a long steep downhill in the telecom industry.
7
The Battle of the AtlanticThe Battle of the Atlantic
Design capacity and RFS Gbps* RFS– Level 3/GC (Project Yellow) 1,280 Sep00
– TAT-14 (Club) 640 Apr01
– Hibernia (360networks, Inc.) 1,920 Jun01
– FLAG Atlantic-1 (FLAG/GTS) 2,560 Sep01
– Atlantic Crossing -2 (Global Crossing) 2,560** 1Q01
– TyCo Global Network 2,560 Jun02
– Apollo (C&W) 3,200 Feb03
– Total 12,160Gbps!
* = Design capacity** = Cancelled, AC-2 joining Level 3
Lit capacity early 2003: 2,338Gb (source: Telegeography)
8
The Battle of the PacificThe Battle of the Pacific Design capacity and RFS Gbps* RFS
– TPC-5 (club) 20 Dec98
– Southern Cross 480 Nov00
– China-US (club) 80 Jan 01
– PC-1 (Global Crossing & Marubeni) 640 Apr01
– Japan-US (club) 640 Oct01
– Tyco Pacific 5,120** Jan03
– FP-1 FLAG Pacific 5,120*** 2Q02
– 360 Pacific 4,800*** 3Q02
– Total 6,980Gbps * = Design capacity** = april 01: Tycom joins FLAG aug 01: FLAG withdraws, Tycom continues alone; RFS postponed ***= project dropped
Lit capacity early 2003: 1,043 (Telegeography)
9
Transoceanic buildout frenzy completedTransoceanic buildout frenzy completed
With the activation of the C&W Apollo transatlantic and Tyco’s transpacific cable the current phase of intense build-out is coming to an end
With current fill rates low and about 3 years between start and completion of a project, this means new cables unlikely before 2007-2008
Weak point remains Europe-Asia capacity. Should improve with SEAMEWE4 scheduled RFS date Q1 2005 with 1.28Tb/s design capacity.
10
Could there be some oversupply?Could there be some oversupply?
Atlantic: 19% of total capacity lit (2,338Gb). Of lit capacity about 1,300Gb is sold.
Pacific: 16% lit (1,043Gb) Intra-Asia : 3.5% lit (15,810 Gb design capacity) US-Latin America: 6% lit ( 5,166 GB design) Europe-Asia: 30 gig lit ; 120 gig design capacity Europe-Africa-Asia: 10 gig lit ; 130 gig design
Numbers; Telegeography 2003 Int’l bandwidth report
11
Congratulations Iceland !Congratulations Iceland !
FARICE : 40 gig at RFS 640 gig design RFS jan 1st 2004
Ready to participate in lambdaswitching!
12
Predictions and forecasts revisitedPredictions and forecasts revisited• What will fill the capacity and how fast?
• Current (2003) transatlantic: voice: 9.3gig internet: 258.3gig other (IPL etc): 48.7gig
•TeleGeography predicts a slow growth scenario of 763.6gig and a fast growth of 1.48Tb for 2007
•Who would dare to predict it will take 17 years to fill the capacity?
•Could lambda switching have the same disruptive effect on predictions and forecasts as internet was about to have when planning capacity a decade ago?
13
Who still remembers Icecan and Scotice?Who still remembers Icecan and Scotice?
Laid in 1961-62, capacity: 24 telephone channels
Also in 1961, COTC as Teleglobe was known in those days together with BPO and C&W activated the first Cantat between New Foundland and Scotland with a capacity of 80 telephone channels. Cantat1 was retired in 1986
From the Bill Glover cable stamp collection
See: http://www.atlantic-cable.com/
14
Disruptive capacity growth? Disruptive capacity growth? It happened before It happened before
In the 1950s new technology put cables ahead of radio. Small vacuum tubes that could operate under water for 20 years or more meant that amplifiers could be buried at sea with the cable. This boosted the cable's information capacity to the point that it could even carry telephone signals.
Small vacuum tubes like this could be buried at sea with the cable for years. They helped to increase a cable's information-carrying capacity by more than a thousandfold.
Borrowed from : The Underwater web, Smithsonian Institute
http://www.sil.si.edu/Exhibitions/Underwater-Web/uw-credits.htm
15
AgendaAgenda
Evolution of Transoceanic Internet Capacity Demand and Supply
Aftermath of the Great Telecom Storm
The R&E World Sees More and More Light
Next (Light)wave of Opportunities
16
Aftermath of the perfect stormAftermath of the perfect storm
More than 100 billion in default Huge write-offs Market valuation telecom sector down 1 trillion $ 500,000+ jobs lost at service providers and manufacturers Carrier capex still very conservative First wave emerges from bankruptcy protection Bottom reached but slow recovery
17
How did we get into this predicament?How did we get into this predicament?
Deregulation + internet and wireless boom + abundance of equity capital --» wild spending by established telecom carriers and start-ups.
1996 US Telecom Act and European deregulation promised access to a US$300 billion market growing at 10% p.a.
Emulation of get rich quick model by 1996 purchase of MFS by Worldcom for US$14billion or 6 times the value of assets put in the ground
Spectacular advances in DWDM technology expected to accomodate an insatiable bandwidth demand.
18
How did we get into this predicament? (2)How did we get into this predicament? (2)
Unrealistic expectations of traffic growth Does internet traffic double every 90 days or every
year? depends on what scale you look at it. Rising multipolarity of the internet was largely ignored
in early models : end of the US centricity of information– Japan : 80% of accessed internet info is local.– Chile: 70% is local– USA: 10 to 30% of accessed information resides in the
region!
19
During the storm : progress continued During the storm : progress continued
20+ million Broadband internet accesses (DSL and cable) in NA by end of 2003
2 million personal Wi-Fi routers (Linksys, D-link etc)
The Wi-Fi hotspot phenomenon
Cellphones become multifunctional and start to replace fixed line
Stage set for the next wave : global reachability and mobility
20
AgendaAgenda
Evolution of Transoceanic Internet Capacity Demand and Supply
Aftermath of the Great Telecom Storm
The R&E World Sees More and More Light
Next (Light)wave of Opportunities
21
The R&E world savours the bandwidth glutThe R&E world savours the bandwidth glut
Happy days for the R&E world: – Europe: Geant goes 10 gig, some NREN’s also – North-America: lambda’s and dark fibre – Transatlantic: Finally enough to satisfy the bandwidth
gluttony of the high energy physics people. 10gig transatlantic links on the verge of becoming common place.
– Transpacific and intra-Asia: slower price decline, lambda’s still have to wait a while.
– Europe-Asia : remains a bottle-neck however.
22
North-American R&E lambda initiativesNorth-American R&E lambda initiatives Canada
– Ca*net4 : Canarie federal R&E network– RISQ : Quebec– ORANO : Ontario – BCnet ORAN: British Columbia
USA– NLR (National Lightrail): CENIC, Cisco, Level3– Fiberco : Internet2 with Level3– USAwave : SURA with AT&T – Teragrid– DoE ultrascale : initially ORNL – Sunnyvale - Chicago– Abilene 2nd gen
23
USA regional R&E initiativesUSA regional R&E initiatives California (CENIC Optical Networking Initiative) Connecticut (Connecticut Education Network) Florida (Florida LambdaRail) Indiana (I-LIGHT) Illinois (I-WIRE) Maryland, D.C. & northern Virginia (MAX) Michigan New York + New England states (NEREN) North Carolina (NCNI) Ohio (Third Frontier Network) Oregon SURA Crossroads (southeastern region) Texas (Star of Texas)
Source: Paul Love internet2 Jtech Lawrence,Ka august 4th
24
Transatlantic R&E lambda initiativesTransatlantic R&E lambda initiatives
Translight– Starlight : Eurolink -UIC– Netherlight : SURFnet– DataTAG/CERN– Canarie
10 gig triangle Chicago-Amsterdam-Geneva and Ca*net4 10 gig to NY and Seattle
25
The capacity divideThe capacity divide Uneven geographic distribution of capacity gluts contributes to a
capacity divide, sometimes further exacerbated by monopolies or oligopolies in certain regions
Clearly illustrated by the SLAC PingER project measuring regional disparities of internet packet loss.
Abrupt halt of the global build affected Mediterranean and Europe-Asia
Uneven capacity distribution is also visible on national and regional level: Everyone builds on same major routes and same major population centers.
26
AgendaAgenda
Evolution of Transoceanic Internet Capacity Demand and Supply
Aftermath of the Great Telecom Storm
The R&E World Sees More and More Light
Next (Light)wave of Opportunities
27
The optical future has already startedThe optical future has already started Will it lead to an all-optical future? Will Moore’s law and related laws for growth of fiber
transmission capacity and internet growth continue to apply? Probably
The laws of gravity still apply, even in the New Economy. Progress alternates between periods of exponential growth and plateaus were the progress is absorbed.
Technology ahead of demand?– 160 wavelengths at 40Gb ?– Soliton technology? – Optical crystals and hollow-core fibers with another 100fold
increase of capacity per fiberstrand capacity?
28
The Verizon optical betThe Verizon optical bet
Verizon plans fiber to every home and business in its 29 state territory : 10-15years and US$20 to 40 billion. US$12.5 capex in2003.
Why? Cable Companies are eating into phone lines (2.2 million end 2002, forecast 3.7 million in 2005 ) and are ahead in broadband internet (66% of the 18 million US BB internet users).
Is this model applicable outside the US in coming years?
– Not sure; phone companies DSL dominate in many countries. Competitive pressure from cablecos mostly not so severe.
As reported in Business Week, August 4th
29
What are the next telecom growth engines?What are the next telecom growth engines? The telecom ecosystem is famished. Hopes for reviving corporate
and end-user demand are largely pinned on– Integrated mobile internet access (E-mail,web, data), 3G– SMS, Voice over IP, location based services– Home/SME area networks– Local wireless: Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Ultra large Bandwidth– Further penetration of DSL and cable access, FTTH?– P2P applications : videoconferencing, gaming etc.– Secure VPN’s and end to end security and encryption.– Remote monitoring, tracking, sensing (healthcare, transportation etc.)– Audio/videostreaming– sensor networks, RFID
Widespread penetration of this end to end mobility and reachability on the internet implies the deployment of IPv6, prerequisite for permanent addresses, scaleability and sufficient address space.
30
Next: the era of ubiquitous everythingNext: the era of ubiquitous everything
Ubiquitous computing
Ubiquitous communication
Ubiquitous information access
Ubiquitous monitoring
Ubiquitous localisation and tracking
Ubiquitous neighbour discovery and sentient networks
31
Thank you for your attention