1 Leading and Managing Leading and Managing Teacher Development Teacher Development through through In-house Training In-house Training Melanie Cooke and Henry J Peterson Melanie Cooke and Henry J Peterson Department of Education
Mar 28, 2015
1
Leading and Managing Leading and Managing Teacher Development Teacher Development
through through
In-house TrainingIn-house TrainingMelanie Cooke and Henry J PetersonMelanie Cooke and Henry J Peterson
Department of Education
Mentor and Coach Mentor and Coach Henry Petersen Henry Petersen
Advisor, Counsellor,
Guide, Guru.
Teacher, Trainer, Instructor, Tutor,
(Trains,& Instructs)
Change , Growth,
becoming successful
3
Teacher Training vs. Teacher Training vs. Teacher Development Teacher Development
1: 1: ObjectivesObjectives
4
2. 2. ObjectivesObjectives
5
3. 3. ObjectivesObjectives
6
4. Objectives4. Objectives
7
5. Objectives5. Objectives
8
9
In Service TrainingIn Service Training Trained over of period of 2 years 29
principles for 32 days. Training day = 6 hours
10
In Service Teacher In Service Teacher TrainingTraining
11
In Service Teacher In Service Teacher TrainingTraining
Lack of participation and activity.
Attendees loose attention
12
Formal DiscussionsFormal Discussions
R Reddy Springs Secondary
14
In Service TrainingIn Service Training Future Collaboration Sessions
(Teamwork)
15
In Service Teacher In Service Teacher TrainingTraining
Networked learning
16
In Service Teacher In Service Teacher TrainingTraining
17
Office of the Office of the Education Education Council in ThailandCouncil in Thailand
18
Pilot Project : The Office of Pilot Project : The Office of the Education Council in the Education Council in ThailandThailand ( Kalyanamitta Model ) ( Kalyanamitta Model ) Puntumasen (2004)
Master teachers receive a subsidy to create 10 teacher networks. At present 586 Master teachers who train 8,848 teacher networks.
Outstanding teachers receive a subsidy to conduct research. They also train and network 50 teachers over three years. Present 26 teachers have trained 1 500 teachers.
19
Pilot Project: The Office of Pilot Project: The Office of thethe Education Council in Education Council in ThailandThailand ( Kalyanamitta Model ) ( Kalyanamitta Model ) Puntumasen (2004)
School-Based Training project where selected teachers is provided with a subsidy to train 10 other teacher from the same school or nearby schools.
Similar training programmes in New York where teachers teaching load was reduced. They then opened their classrooms for professional development.
20
Factors for Successful Factors for Successful School Based Training School Based Training
Trust in collective credibility
21
Principles: School Based Principles: School Based Training Training
(SBT) (SBT) Pruet Siribanpitak & Aurapan Pornsima, 2003, as cited by Puntumasen (2004)
Training must : Be based on real situations. Enhance competence Take place at schools. Be voluntary Practical Done on a continuous base. Be enhanced by teachers or
groups of teachers, who are familiar with teaching and learning.
22
Key factors for Successful School Key factors for Successful School Based Training (SBT) Based Training (SBT) Puntumasen (2004)
Principals must provide support Training co-ordinators should take into
consideration needs of teachers in the formulation of the training objectives.
Trainers must be accepted. Trainees must be interested and
committed. Training must be long term and done
on a regular basis. Training schedules must be flexible. Budgetary provisioning. Teachers who train must receive a
subsidy. All training should be evaluated.
23
Model for School Based Model for School Based Training (SBT) Training (SBT)
In-house training offered to teachers in a particular school or cluster, where the training is planned and organised by the School Management Team/s.
24
The role of the School The role of the School Management Team in School Management Team in School Based, (In-House Training)Based, (In-House Training)..
Sauer and Holland (1981)
Data collector an analyst. Designer and Resource Planner. Scheduler and supervisor. Proposal writer and host. Evaluator.
R Reddy Springs Secondary
Processes: Processes: School Based, In-house School Based, In-house Training Programmes.Training Programmes.
25
1.Understanding the context of the School
2. Collecting and Analysing Data3.Setting of objectives 4.Principles in Training Design.5.Identifying Resources 6.Preparing the Training Schedule7.Invitation to the training 8. Evaluation of training R Reddy Springs
Secondary
26
Understanding the Context of the Understanding the Context of the SchoolSchool
Fundamental questions Sauer and Holland (1981)
Why does the training function exist?
Where does the training fit in? Is there a training policy? Who wants the training to happen
and for what? What resistance to training exists? How important is training? To
Whom? Why R Reddy Springs Secondary
27
1: Understanding the Context of the School1: Understanding the Context of the School
Management
Principal and School Governing Body,
Resources, Budget, People, Associates, Other Schools Training Policy, Copying, printing, Meeting Space, borrowed staff
School Development Plan
School Improvement Plan
In-House Training Plan and Budget Memo’s Correspondence
Evaluation reports
School Management Team and School Development Team
In-House Training
Formal Needs GDE
Informal Information
Needs and Wants of Teachers
Invitation to in-house –training
Feedback
Master Teachers and Teachers
Improved Performance in delivering of Teaching
Output: Learning
Results of Learners
28
2: 2: Collecting and Analysing Collecting and Analysing Data Data Training is informed by data. (PGP) Evaluation of communication
integration networks externally with other schools and teachers was not explored.
Categorizing of Data Data for planning a training event.
(PGP) Data useful for another training event Data that might be reported to
management Data that could be discarded.
29
3.3. Categories of Objectives Categories of Objectives for Training.for Training.
Objectives that results in
improved performance in teaching
Innovative objectives that improves performance to levels of excellence in teaching
IQMS IQMS The IQMS document outlines the following
roles for the Principal in the implementation of the Policy:
IQMS is implemented. Provided educators with a copy of the
IQMS documentation.Responsible for advocacy and training.Workshop educators on the IQMSEstablishment of the (Staff Development
Team) SDT.Ensures that all documentation is correct
and delivered in time. Internal moderation of evaluation results.
31
4. 4. Principles in Training Principles in Training DesignDesignPrinciples in training design: Sauer and Hollard, 1981:80
Harmony: By agreement
Contrast : Comparisons What? How?
Balance: Activities loosely planned. E.g. Workshops on Stress
Order: Training before Data Analysis
Unity: Disjunction between Vision/ Mission/
Objectives and Training Activities
32
4: Resources , 4: Resources , 5: Training Schedules 5: Training Schedules 6: Invitations6: Invitations
7: Evaluation of the 7: Evaluation of the Impact of Training on Impact of Training on Teaching and Learning Teaching and Learning ??
34
Values: Values: Puntumasen (2004) “ Puntumasen (2004) “ Kalyanamitta ModelKalyanamitta Model
•Appreciation and the need for teacher training .•Collaboration between trainer and trainees•Commitment•Open-mindedness resulting on self -improvement
constantly connected