1 [insert briefing type here] [insert program name here] for [insert name and organization of person(s) to be briefed here] [insert “month day, year” of brief here] Briefed by: [insert briefer’s name here] [insert briefer’s organization code here] [insert briefer’s phone number here] [Insert briefer’s e-mail address here] Insert program logo in this area Distribution Statement
38
Embed
1 [insert briefing type here] [insert program name here] for [insert name and organization of person(s) to be briefed here] [insert “month day, year” of.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
[insert briefing type here][insert program name here]
for[insert name and organization of
person(s) to be briefed here]
[insert “month day, year” of brief here]
Briefed by:[insert briefer’s name here]
[insert briefer’s organization code here]
[insert briefer’s phone number here]
[Insert briefer’s e-mail address here]Insert program
logo in this area
Distribution Statement
2
Programlogohere
Key Stakeholders
Name Organization
APM
MDA
DT Coordinator
COMOPTEVFOR (OTD)
COMOPTEVFOR (OTC)
CNO (N912)
CNO (N-sponsor)
JITC
DOT&E (if required)
Others (as required)
-PMW, SYSCOMS, Service
3
ProgramlogoherePurpose of Briefing
4
ProgramlogohereBriefing Outline
5
Programlogohere
Program Overview
• ACAT
• Program Phase
• Milestone or Decision that this phase of test will support
• Mission
• Inventory Objective (quantities)
6
Programlogohere
ADM Exit Criteria andAction Item Status
R Required at this time, but not completed
G Completed
Y In progress & on schedule
Program Information StatusApproved
DateComments
ADM Exit Criteria
ADM Exit Criteria 1
ADM Exit Criteria 2
ADM Exit Criteria N
Action Items
Action Items 1
Action Items 2
Action Items N
7
ProgramlogohereConcept/Requirement
8
Programlogohere
System OverviewComponent/System Description
9
Programlogohere
System OverviewCapability Enabler
10
Programlogohere
Deployed/MobileUnits
BASE
IMAFISC
PierConnections
CLINIC
TRNG CENHQ
TELEPORT/STEPLong Haul (DISN & Commercial)
TRAININGCENTER
USN/USMCLOGISTIC BASE
NAVALAMPHIBIOUS
BASE
NOC
BASE
MC AIRSTATION
End-to-End Connectivity
NMCI atthe Pier
Development StrategyEnd-to-End Capability
11
Programlogohere
Program OverviewAccomplishments/History
12
Programlogohere
Program OverviewPrevious Guidance
(if Required)
13
Programlogohere
Acquisition Coordination Team (ACT)• The following (Program Name) ACT members have been briefed on the program status and concur with the fielding of (Program Name).
Program Manager VariesAcquisition PM VariesProject Engineer VariesResource Sponsor VariesRequirements Sponsor VariesContracts Mr. David Ryan SPAWAR 02 (858) 537-0314Contracts Mr. Mark Lopez SPAWAR 02 (619) 524-7168Contracts Ms. Marcia Rutledge SPAWAR 02 (619) 524-7201Legal Mr. David Beale SPAWAR 00C-1 (619) 524-7049Operational Test Director VariesAcquisition Management Ed Butrovich PEO C4I-AM (619) 524-7652Technical Director (Comms & Networks)
Env., Safety and Health Jerry Olen SPAWAR/ NFESC (858) 537-0255
System Security/Information Assurance
Ed Burr PEO C4I (619) 524-7519
Spectrum Management Dave Southworth SPAWAR (619) 553-3248Interoperability Certification / Information Support Plans
Greg Settelmayer/ Charlie Suggs
PEO C4I-TD (619) 524-7182/ (619) 524-7237
Manpower Analysis Janet Garrington SPAWAR 04H (858) 537-8950Security Pat Varney SPAWAR 08 (858) 537 8898Human Systems Integration Carol Robinson SPAWAR 05-5 (858) 537-8907C4I Technical Authority Dennis Pinkard SPAWAR 05 (858) 537-0673
14
Programlogohere
Program Information and Documentation Status
R Required at this time, but does not exist B Requires development or updating w/in 12 months
O Required at this time and under development/update G Current, with all required approvals
Y In approval cycle. Expected Date in Comments NR Not required. Rationale in Comments
Program Information StatusApproved
DatePlanned
DateComments
ACAT Designation LetterAcquisition Decision MemorandumAcquisition Program BaselineAcquisition StrategyAffordability AssessmentAnalysis of AlternativesCAIV Objectives CDD/CPDClinger-Cohen ComplianceEnv. Safety & Health EvaluationEVMIA StrategyInformation Support Plan (ISP)InfoSec Certification and AccreditationInitial Capabilities DocumentJITC Interoperability CertificationLCCE/Economic Analysis/ICEIndependent Logistics AssessmentLow Rate Initial Prod (LRIP) DecisionNavy Training System Plan (NTSP)OP Test PlanPost-Deployment Performance ReviewProgram Protection PlanRisk Assessment Safe for Test CertificationTechnology Development Strategy (TDS)Test & Evaluation Master PlanTest Results (DT&E/OT&E/FOT&E)
1. FY05 includes 11 LRIP systems and 27 Increment II Upgrade Kits which are on CODE B hold pending FRP
2. Target Inventory Objective of 110 systems
* Current procurement and install schedule includes 96 ships and 4 shore sites
* Remaining 10 systems planned for FY09 not shown in table, Program direction expects INC III installation to begin and INC II to end in FY09
17
ProgramlogohereSPAWAR 01-6 Cost Risk
Rating RISK
1.0-2.0 LOW
>2.0-3.0 MODERATE
>3.0-4.0 HIGH
>4.0-5.0 VERY HIGH
Cost-Weighted RatingRating Methods Rating Data
1 The basic method used to perform this analysis is exceptionally well documented and time tested; one or more other techniques have been used to verify the estimate provided.
1 Very complete, well-authenticated, highly relevant data, such as recent contractor actual costs, official catalog prices, etc. have been used.
2 The basic method used to perform this analysis is well documented, but no double-check or authentication has been possible.
2 The data used generally are relevant and from a reputable source; however, they are incomplete, preliminary, or not completely current.
3 The basic method used to perform this analysis has been documented, but has not been widely used or approved.
3 The data used have been obtained from official or standard sources; however, notable inconsistencies, lack of currency, or gaps in data reduce the confidence in the estimate.
4 A highly arbitrary method of analysis has been used.
4 The data used to make the estimate are highly suspect, or doubtful relevance, very sparse in quantity, and characterized by major inconsistencies.
5 The analysis is almost pure guesswork, and little or no confidence can be placed in it.
5 An almost total lack of current, reliable, relevant data makes the cost estimate completely uncertain.
Source: FAA Life Cycle Cost Handbook, 3 June 2002
Two Digit Confidence Index
Two Digit Confidence Index *METHOD. DATA METHOD. DATA
SCORE 1.64 1.48 1.54 1.33
TOTAL LCC PROGRAM COSTS ONLY
* Confidence Index based on weighted averages
18
Programlogohere
Cost as an Independent Variable(CAIV)
19
ProgramlogohereAnalysis of Alternatives
KPP ALT 1 ALT 2 ALT 3 ALT 4
KPP 1
KPP 2
KPP 3
KPP 4
LCC ($TYM)Then Year Millions
$ $ $ $
20
Programlogohere
• Source Documents:– Typical source documents that effect strategy are ICD/CDD/CPD,
AoA, etc.
• Approach: Single Step or Evolutionary – Each increment requires a MS C and if development a MS B.
These could be supported by one CDD containing all capabilities and multiple CPDs supporting each increment of useable capability. Each increment could use the same CDD (revalidated each time) for the MS B and would have a separate CPD for the MS C. This method supports Evolutionary acquisition, the preferred approach. See CJCSI 3170 for other Evolutionary approached
Acquisition Strategy (Requirements and Approach)
21
Programlogohere
Acquisition Strategy (Program Structure)
Concept Decision
Milestone A
RFP Development
Milestone B
Contract Award
Development Test/OA
Milestone C/LRIP Decision
Operational Test
IOC
FRP Decision
FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
22
Programlogohere
Acquisition Strategy (Business Approach)
Current ContractsProgram Product or Service Total Contract ValueCompeted Contract Type Period of Performance Approved AP
Y or N FFP 10/1/03 - 9/30/04 Y or N
New Procurement Actions• Proposed [name of effort] Contract
– Competitive or Sole Source (if sole source provide justification– Contract Type:– Estimated contract value: – Period of Performance:– Acquisition Objectives:– Estimated Contract Award:– Status of Acquisition Plan:
23
Programlogohere
Contractor Name, Contract Number, Contract Type, Short Contract Title
Contract EV Metrics and Performance Projections
YSolvency (Provide
comments in notes page)
PEO and Program Manager/PMS-XXX, Program Acronym, ACAT XX, Date Reported