1 IACS Common Structural Rules INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Rio de Janeiro, 25 April 2006
Dec 13, 2015
2
Aim
To develop a set of unified Rules and Procedures for the determination of the structural requirements for oil tankers and bulk carriers
3
Objective
To eliminate competition between class societies with regard to structural requirements and standards
To ensure that a vessel meeting these new standards will be recognised by industry as being at least as safe and robust as would have been required by any of the existing Rules
To fully embrace the intentions of the anticipated IMO requirements for goal based new construction standards
4
Why new rules?
Today’s ships are satisfactory, however, ship structural Rules need improvement
The ship rules do not have a clear and rational link between requirements for newbuildings and operation
The ship rules are not in line with state-of-the-art in safety regulations for other segments, e.g., offshore, nuclear, aviation
The ship rules have not kept up with design development in terms of use of technology
5
Aspects associated with “robustness” and “durability” deal with items that change over the life of the vessel, such as:
Corrosion – ensuring that corrosion is addressed using clear corrosion margins that are linked to the original strength assessment
Fatigue – ensuring that fatigue is assessed using a harsh environment and sufficient design life (25 years in the North Atlantic)
Review of structural components for relevant assessment criteria (or failure modes), such as:
Material yielding, compressive buckling, member tripping, etc.
Addressing “robustness”
6
IACS Common Structural Rules
CSR for Bulk Carriers BV, CCS, GL, KR, NK, RINA & RS
Complete set of Structural Rules for SSS and DSS Bulk Carriers
Length greater than or equal to 90m
CSR for Tankers LRS, ABS & DNV
Complete Set of Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers
Length greater than or equal to 150m
7
Features of the new Common Structural Rules
Rules are to result in common scantling requirements
Net scantling approach includes a clear link between newbuilding strength checks and in-service gauging review standards
Include coating standard criteria
Fatigue standard enhanced to include exposure to North Atlantic environment with minimum life of 25 years
Includes the results from industry input and feedback
8
CSR Features - Net Scantling Approach
Predicted corrosion
in 2.5 years (0.5 mm)
RequiredNet
Thickness
CorrosionAddition
Design
RequiredRenewalThickness
WastageAllowance
In Service
Annual ThicknessMeasurements
includes link between newbuilding and in-service standards
9
As-built and renewal thicknesses to be indicated in the vessel drawings
Renewal values given in millimeters (not percentage of as-built)
Renewals cover general corrosion as well as local pitting, grooving and edge corrosion
CSR Features – Renewal Criteria
10
Noted work being undertaken by the IMO to amend SOLAS Regulation II-1/3-2
Introduced a “Performance Standard for Protective Coatings for Ballast Tanks and Void Spaces” into the CSRs
CSRs tied to the IMO process Will be mandatory for ships contracted for construction
on or after the date of the IMO adoption of the amended SOLAS Regulation II- 1/3-2
This requirement will effectively advance the date of implementation for tankers and bulk carriers (adoption is not expected before December 2006 at the earliest)
CSR Features – Coating Performance Standard
11
IMO Coating Performance Standards (CPS)Earliest Implementation Schedule for SOLAS and IACS CSR
RevisedSOLAS II-1/3-2 entry into force mandating CPSfor shipswith keel laidon/after 01 Jul 08
Draft CPS(DE 49)
SOLAS XII/6.3 enters into force recommending CPS for Bulk Carriers
Approval of CPS and SOLAS II-1/3-2(MSC 81)
Adoption of CPS and Revised SOLAS II-1/3-2 (MSC 82)
IACS CSR requires CPS for shipscontracted for construction on/after the adoption date of the Revised SOLAS II-1/3-2
2007(Jan)
2006(Jan)
2008(Jan)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 3 4 5 6 7
14
Where to get more information
ABS Support for CSR:
www.eagle.org
CSR Tanker:
www.jtprules.com
CSR Bulk Carrier:
www.jbprules.com
15
Maintenance Plan IACS Hull Panel
• Inquiry replies, Rule amendments, interpretations• Consistent implementation
Tanker and Bulk Carrier Teams• Technical expertise
Harmonization Plan One year feedback period before long term harmonization Three years of harmonization work One year for implementation Full harmonization in five years from implementation
CSR Maintenance and Harmonization
17
CSR/Tanker - Table of Contents
Section Topic1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Introduction
Underlying Principles
Rules Applications
Basic Information
Structural Arrangement
Material and Welding
Loads
Scantling Requirements
Section Topic
9
10
11
12
A
B
C
D
Design Verification
Buckling and Ultimate- Strength
General Requirements
Renewal Criteria (SiO)
Hull Girder Ultimate Strength
Structural Strength Assessment
Fatigue Strength Assessment
Buckling Strength Assessment
19
Summary Approx. steelweight changes
As-built cargo block steelweight in
Tonnes
JTP compliant cargo block steelweight in
Tonnes
Tonnes increase
Percentage increase
VLCC 1 28403 29203 800 +3%
VLCC 2 26306 27335 1029 +4%(1)
SUEZMAX 12609 13445 836 +7% (1)
AFRAMAX 2 9919 10399 480 +5%
PANAMAX 1 7454 7697 243 +3%
PRODUCT 1 5467 5599 132 +3%
PRODUCT 2 4347 4606 259 +6%
(1) plating has not been optimised