1 Global Development Initiative Higher Education and International Development April 10-11, 2008 Research Universities and Development: Views from Latin America Jorge Balan Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad Buenos Aires, Argentina [email protected]
23
Embed
1 Global Development Initiative Higher Education and International Development April 10-11, 2008 Research Universities and Development: Views from Latin.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Global Development InitiativeHigher Education and International Development
April 10-11, 2008
Research Universities and Development: Views from Latin America
investment)5. Focus on underfunded research for development
5
REDEFINING ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES
• A valuable resource for business and industry
• Contributors to regional economic revival and high-tech growth through R&D, spin-off firms, technology parks and business incubators, entrepreneurial training
• The “Third Mission” plus –feedback loops to research and teaching
6
BUT…• Universities and other HE institutions need to reform to increase
their academic capabilities to contribute to development• Academic capabilities are related to new/expanded functions (i.e.,
research, graduate training) but also to organizational reforms leading to greater efficiency and sustainability
• Higher education reforms –top down and bottom up- have a long history, but since the 1980s became more radical and heavily influenced by “new management” theories and practices, worldwide
• Higher education reforms –the new contract between governments and higher education
• Higher education reforms –institutional differentiation and the quest to build research universities in the South
• Higher education, development, and poverty alleviation: what role for the research university?
7
THIRD MISSION: OLD AND NEW
• From “extension” in the 50s and 60s –public university services to government and community, to
• “Third Mission” in the 2000s–broad range of market-driven activities performed by entrepreneurial units under the leadership of entrepreneurial faculty
8
EXTENSION VERSUS THIRD MISSION
“…extension meant the projection of a university’s knowledge resources onto the disadvantaged, the marginalized, and the disenfranchised, with aims of social development, community building, and the deepening of democracy, but now extension has become a business unit catering to the cultural, educational, and recreational demands of firms and individuals in the upper segments of society.”
9
MARKET, MISSION, AND THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY
• The public mission lies in final outcomes: leadership training, public nature of knowledge, innovation, growth
• The public mission lies in cross-subsidies: who pays for what?
• The public mission lies in inputs: equal opportunities and social mobility
• The public mission lies in the institutional “fit”: the university in (national/regional) development strategy
• Making the case for a public mission and making it sustainable
10
RESEARCH WITHIN ACADEMIA: NEW CONCEPTUAL UNDERPINNINGS
1. Research modes: Mode 1 vs Mode 2
2. The Triple Helix: government, industry, university.
11
MODE 1
• MODE 1: “Old paradigm of scientific discovery characterized by the hegemony of disciplinary science, with its strong sense of an internal hierarchy between the disciplines and driven by the autonomy of scientists and their host institutions, the universities, was being superseded –but not replaced—by a new paradigm of knowledge production”: Mode 2
12
MODE 2
• MODE 2: “socially distributed, application-oriented, transdisciplinary, and subject to multiple accountabilities.” “Knowledge is generated in the context of application, where a range of theoretical perspectives and practical methodologies to solve problems are mobilized.”
The Triple Helix
• The triangular relationship between state, university, and industry: old and new
• Higher education, research, and industrial development as policy realms
• Triple Helix: the uses of a Model
13
14
15
16
17
University entrepreneurship
1. Decline/change in public funding, new public management
2. Increased competition for resources
3. Differentiation of (public) mission
4. Organizational convergence: are university and business becoming alike?
18
R&D: GLOBAL TRENDS About 80% of all R&D expenditures takes place
among OECD countries –45% just in the US and Japan.
But in 2005 China was the third largest country in R&D ($115 billion) and India and Korea are within the largest 10, Brazil is next.
R&D intensity: wealthy economies spend up to 3% of GDP, developing countries 1%
R&D: (relative) decline in government funding, increase in performance by industry and academia.
R&D mobility: multinational corporations, from brain drain to (recent, selective) brain gain, international co-authorship
19
Building research university: Historical models
• The US model before and after WWII• Research and industry: the Japanese/Korean models.• Research by government institutes: the continental model, the
soviet and Chinese versions. • Research into academia: recent policy to build research within the
university• Government and steering of higher education: focus on research
universities and expanding access.• Incentives for university-industry collaboration.• Large scale international student outflow (US/UK), recently
reversed.• Growing public and private investment in Higher Ed
World-Class Worldwide
• The new competitive context: ratings and rankings
• Science policy and higher education policy: why competing internationally?
• The policy and politics of differentiation: Asian and Latin American cases contrasted
21
Latin American Case Studies
• The Latin American/European Paradox: good quality academic research, low intensity Mode 2 research
• Four areas, four countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico)
• Case studies of success (Mode 1 and Mode 2)
22
Selected results
• Diversified funding is key: virtue or necessity, public and private
• Favorable changes in policy environment, but…• Confrontation with university rules and regulations• Institutionally de-centered, even marginal• Strong academic leadership with entrepreneurial
skills• Team work & group identity• Academic values/career prevail –narrow academic
policies for promotion• Low emphasis/experience in IPR/patenting: is
patenting that important?
The new horizon
• Higher education and society: a new contract
• Building a new legitimacy for the research enterprise in developing countries
• Issues of public accountability
• Sustainability of the research enterprise in a global economy