1 Geography of Population 4 Feeding the hungry
1
Geography of Population 4
Feeding the hungry
2
Population and food
World population growthT.R. Malthus and the problem of the carrying capacityFood requirementsMore food, less people or new thinking?
3
World population growth
Year Millions + % per annum Years for doubling
1750 791
1800 978 0.43 161
1850 1,262 0.51 136
1900 1,650 0.54 128
1930 2,070 0.76 91
1950 2,916 0.98 69
1960 3,037 1.86 37
1970 3.693 2.04 34
1980 4,449 1.88 37
1990 5,321 1.82 38
2000 6,100 1.38 51
4
Consequences of growth
More space to live onMore space to create jobsMore space for transportation routesMore space to produce food... and what about the ecosystem?
5
The food problem
What is nutrition?Intake of substances every living being (plants, animals, humans) need for growth and survivalOrganic substances (proteins, carbon-hydrates, fats), fibres, water, salt, vitamins, tracer elements
furnish energy, replace old body substances, create new body substances
6
Equilibrium nutrition
Water, drinks
Cereal products, potatoes
Oil, fatSugar, sweets
Milk, milkproductsFish, meat, eggs, pulses
Fruit, vegetables
7
Key factors
Supply and demand
Lifestyle Living standard
8
Supply and demand
SupplyLand use (harvest rhythm, succession)DemandProduction areasTransportationStorage capacitiesNatural potential (soils, climate)Culture, attitudes
DemandSocial situation of con-sumers (age, habits)Economic situation of consumers (income, subsistence)Degree of urbanizationCulture, attitudesSupplyNumber of consumers
9
T.R. Malthus
1766-1834 1797 priest (Church of England)1806 Professor for history and political economy (East India Company Hailesbury College)1798 ‘An Essay on the Principle of Population as it affects the Future Improvement of Society, with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other Writers‘ Contemporary of Adam Smith, David Ricardo, J.H. von Thünen
10
Malthus‘ main thesis
Population increases faster than food production (geometric vs. arithmetic progression)This increase is due to an instinct-motivated reproduction of mankind rather than reproduction dictated by reason“Vice” (which included, for Malthus, contra-ception), “misery,” and “self-restraint” alone could check this excessive growth.
11
Background to Malthus
Discussion about poor laws and poor housesAccording to Malthus, the dole contained in the poor laws encouraged the poor to have many childrenDispute with William Godwin (1756-1836), social philosopher and anarchist
12
Critics of Malthus
The priest sees ‘bad morality’ as chief reason for the food problem very simple solution to the food problemThere are other problems than just foodElegant theoryPoor empirical basis
13
Merit of Malthus
Points to a fundamental problemNo calculation of an upper limit of world populationProposes a vicious cycle: more people more food demand more food production more people more ...
14
Carrying capacity: how many people on earth?
"Carrying capacity is the largest number of any given species that a habitat can support indefinitely." For human societies in a specific region, this has to be completed by the cultural and social particularities, the transportation possibilities, and the level of living
There is no simple answer to the question
15
Range of carrying capacity estimates
Ravenstein (1891): 5.995 billionBallod (1912): according to lifestyle:- Japanese lifestyle: 22.4 billion- US lifestyle: 2.3 billionPenck (1925): 7.7 billionRevell (1976): 40 billionWesting (1990): 2 billion
16
Influence of lifestyle
Estimates by Rees & Wackernagel (ca. 1995): Third World lifestyle: 4.5 billionEuropean lifestyle: 2.2 billionUS lifestyle: 1.1 billion
The World population obviously lives beyond its resources!
17
Results
In this domain, the globe cannot be regarded as uniformCarrying capacity varies according to space and timeThe economic basis has to be taken into accountLevels of living are diverse and influence demandThere are no reserve areas availableThe tropical rainforest cannot be used for large-scale food production
18
The tropical rainforest
A relatively closed ecosystemNo profound soil but only a superficial layerFalling leaves rot in the tropical climate immediately, and nutrients pass directly back into the plants (no accumulation in the soil)Felling the forests destroys this short-circuit cycle: agriculture is possible for a short time onlyAdapted agriculture: shifting cultivation
19
Growth of food production
Malthus‘ pessimistic forecasts were not correctAgricultural reforms since the 19th century have increased the output:- better rotation technique (clover instead of fallows)- improved fertilizers- new food plants- land reforms (consolidation of holdings)
20
Agricultural production in Valais (Swiss mountain canton)
18th century 1996
Wheat (tons per ha) c. 1.8 5.3
Milk (100 litres per cow) 800-1,200 4,500-6,000
Wine (100 litres per ha) 15-25 85
21
Agricultural production in China
1957 1995 + %Population (mio) 647 1,211 87.2Cereals (mio t) 191 465 143.5Cereals per head (kg) 295 384 18.0Oil seeds (mio t) 4.2 22.5 435.7Oil seeds per head (kg) 1.7 6.7 294.1Red meat (mio t) 4.0 42.0 950.0Red meat per head (kg) 6.2 34.7 459.7
22
Consequences
Increases in food production are possibleThere is enough food on earth in sufficient quantity for everyoneIt is just a problem of distribution
23
What do we need?
Human wants and needs are not always the sameBest known need: energy intake, measured in calories or joulesFurther intakes: vitamins, proteins, tracer elements, fibres, liquids (water)
24
Energy
Energy intake depends on sex and activity: men need more than women (natural body fat higher in women; activities higher with men)The estimated values vary, however:Basic value: c. 1 kcal per kg body weight of a man 1680 kcal for a man of 70 kgsBasal metabolic rate (at rest): c. 1.25 kcal per minute (man of 65 kgs) and 0.90 kcal per minute (woman of 55 kg) 1800 man, 1296 woman.
25
Energy requirements
Heavy work (mining, lumbering, steel works): 4000 kcal +Medium activities (light industries, carpenters, painters, etc.): 3000 kcal +Light activities (professors, students, drivers, etc.): 2500 kcalWhere are the housewives?Below 2100 kcal: undernourishment
26
The reality
Ethiopian farmers may have to cope with 1800 kcalMinimum in Asia is often at 1600-2000 kcalMountain farmers in 18th century valley of Uri (Switzerland) had around 2500 kcal
27
Global food situationDaily calorie
intake% vegetable
calories% of
requirementSub-Saharan Africa 2 250 93.4 93.7
Middle East 3018 90.6 119.7
South Asia 2215 92.9 98.7
Far East 2638 79.3 113.1
Latin America 2699 82.5 115.3
Europe & CIS 3422 69.169.1 132.6132.6
North America, Oceania 3586 69.169.1 136.2136.2
World 2697 84.3 112.7
28
Interpretation
Although the global situation seems satisfactory, there are substantial regional differencesThe lack of animal calories makes itself felt in Africa and South AsiaThe North is ‘overfed’: given the dominance of the sedentary work, we eat far too muchThe table does not take social differences into account: the rich in the South are not hungryThis points to a grave problem of distribution of food
29
Evolution of undernourishment in the World (FAO Technical report 2000)
1970 1990 1995 2015
Total undernourished (mill.) 960 830 790 430
% of world population 24 16 13 5
absolute change - 360 - 40 - 360
% change - 8 - 3 - 8
30
Really a solution?
Undernourisment cannot be completely eradicatedThe WHO certainly pays a lot of attention to the food problemHowever, there is also wishful thinking: is the same rate of decline possible 1995-2015 and 1970-90?
31
Proteins: varying opinions
What is the minimum quantity of daily protein intake (gram per kg weight)?- League of Nations, 1935 1 gr.- FAO/WHO, 1955 0.52 gr.- FAO/WHO, 1963 0.71 gr.- FAO/WHO, 1971 0.57 gr.- FAO/WHO/UNU, 1985 0.75 gr.
32
Interpretation
There is no consensus among scientists as to the basic requirement12-17 % of the calories can be taken in form of proteinsA deficit of 8 % (infants) and 5 % (adults) with protein intake means undernourish-ment
33
Recommended Nutrient Intakes Age Calcium
mg/dayVitamin A
μg/day Vitamin C
mg/day
0-6 months 300 375 25
7-9 years 700 500 35
Males 19-65 1,000 600 45
Females 19-50 1,000 500 45
Females 50-65 1,300 500 45
34
The potato in 3 shapesNutrient etc. Baked Boiled skin Boiled peeled
Water (%) 71.2 77.0 77.5
Energy (kJ) 456 365 361
Protein (g) 2.3 1.9 1.7
Iron (mg) 1.4 0.3 0.3
Calcium (mg) 10 5 8
Fat (g) 0.1 0.1 0.1
Potassium (mg) 418 379 328
Vitamin C (mg) 13 13 7
35
Efforts to increase food production
1950s – 1990s: Cereal yield per capita rose from 283 to 349 kg (+ 23 %)In the same time, the harvested surface declined from 0.235 to 0.127 ha per capita (- 46 %)Yields per hectare increased from 1205 to 2745 kgs (+ 128 %)
More is produced on less surface available – for how long?
36
Conclusions
Food production has increased worldwideThe absolute increase has been greater in the South than in the NorthThe per capita increase has been lower in the South than in the North thanks to the population growthIn Africa, the absolute production has declinedThe food issue is a problem of distribution
37
The future? Solutions?
The food problem is a social issueDistribution Access to foodFood pricing (for the poor)No speculative storing of foodNo wars (that destroy land and harvests)Environmentally friendly farmingLess fat people in the NorthChange of attitudes
38
A few options
Better use of energyCare for the landMarine resources
39
Better use of energy
1 vegetable calorie (e.g. wheat) is transferred into 1 bread calorieTo obtain 1 animal calorie, the following vegetable calories are needed:
- 12 for chicken meat- 4 for eggs- 3 for pork- 5 for milk
This under conditions of industrial agriculture (mass animal production).
40
Care for the land
Fight soil degradation (less fertilizers)Prevent soil erosion (stone walls, hedges, contour ploughing)Improve irrigation (combination with drainage)Avoid monocultures (unilateral use of nutrients)
41
Land in China: growth and decline
12
34
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
mio ha
Cultivated surfaceCropped surface
19791984
1993
1957
42
Fertilizer efficiency in China, 1969-93
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1969
kg g
rain
/kg
nutr
ient
Dünger-Effizienz in China, 1969-93
43
Marine resources
This is no longer the reserve we once thought (overfishing, stock depletion)Improved management of fisheries towards a sustainable useModerate aquaculture (labour intensive, not capital intensive, real needs, not luxury wants)Market orientation (according to the needs of the people)Promote local fishermen and low-intnesity fishing in order to maintain the stocks and secure jobs
44
Was Malthus right?
Current trends show that the world popula-tion is no longer growing as fast as 30 years agoFood production has increased, but so has population: we are as far as 1950!The decline in the growth of food produc-tion may be the result of excessive stress on the ecosystem
45
Population and cereal production growth, 1950-2000
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2 3 4 5 6
Cereal yield index Population index1950 2000
46
Stress on the ecosystem: Aral Sea
Aral Sea: a basin east of the CaspianThe two rivers of the Aral Sea (Amu Darya and Syr Darya) have been used for the irrigation of intensive cotton fields upstreamThe surface of the Sea has been shrinking since the 1950s (65,000 40,000 sqkm)
47
The ecological limits: irrigation and Lake Aral
48
The decline of Lake Aral
Desiccation of the Aral sea, 1995 to 1996: area decreased by 3885 km2, volume by 36 km3. Salinity: 46 g/l
49
Aral Sea: former beach
50
Genetically modified food – the solution?
Expectation 1: resistence to pests reduces lossesExpectation 2: better seeds give higher yieldsProblem 1: pests can adapt to new circumstances, cannot be eliminatedProblem 2: dependency from hi-tech industrial seed producersProblem 3: loss of genetic potential and biodiversity for the time after biotechnologyProblem 4: what happens in the long term?
51
Other solutions?
More technology into agriculture?Intensive production where conditions are optimal?Free world market for food?Radical antinatalist population policy?
52
A change in Northern attitude
Slimming of the people in the NorthRedefinition of ‘nutrition‘ in the NorthLess exploitation of the SouthMore respect for the food in the North
Food is precious, more than just a commodity to be used and thrown away.