1 Flexible Querying of XML Documents Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan and Trivikram Immaneni Department of Computer Science and Engineering Wright State University.

1

Flexible Querying of XML Documents

Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan and Trivikram Immaneni

Department of Computer Science and EngineeringWright State UniversityDayton, OH-45435, USA

2

Talk Outline

Goal (What?)

Background and Motivation (Why?)

Query Language and Examples (What?)

Implementation Details (How?)

Evaluation and Applications (Why?)

Conclusions

3

Goal

4

Develop a keyword-based XML Query Language and its Semantics that is flexible and sufficiently expressive easy to use (for query formulation)

Implement, reusing mature software components, for efficient indexing and search

5

Background and Motivation

6

XML vs Text Documents

DATA: Exploit metadata/markup and aggregation structure implicit in XML documents For expressiveness and precision

QUERY: Obtain progressively improved extractions using convenient keyword-based queries in contrast with accurate extractions using complex XML-based queries

7

Relationship to Other Work

Extends XSEarch (Cohen et al) Expressive power: Incorporates

attributes and their values Equivalence (E.g., RDF) :

<T A="s"/> vs <T> <A> s </A> </T>

8

Invariance under Refinement <T> <A> word_1 and word_2 </A> </T>vs <T> <A> <B> word_1 </B> and <C> word_2 </C> </A> </T>

9

Coherence

Interconnectedness : Infer related pieces of information using aggregation implicit in XML Cohen et al : Name equivalence

XSEarch

Li et al: Structural equivalence Scheme-free XML

Guo et al : Completeness XRANK

10

Information Retrieval Explore robust relevance ranking

strategy to deal with high recall Variation on TFIDF Naïve implementation computationally

prohibitive Extension beyond “type-delimited-

document” unclear

11

Query Language and Examples (What?)

12

Query Syntax

Entity-Attribute-KeywordSearch Terms e:a:k e:a:, :a:k, e::k e::, a::, ::k

Signed/optional Search Terms + e:a:k vs e:a:k

13

Single Search Term Satisfaction

e:a:k

The search term e:a:k is satisfied by a tree containing a subtree with the top element e that is associated with the attribute a with value containing k, or a subelement a with descendant text node containing k.

14

Example (Mondial)

<country id="f0_149" name="Austria" capital="f0_1467" population="8023244"

datacode="AU" total_area="83850" population_growth="0.41"

infant_mortality="6.2" ... government="federal republic" ...> ...

</country>

:name:Vienna is satisfied by

<province id="f0_17447" name="Vienna" ...>

<city id="f0_1467" country="f0_149" province="f0_17447" ...>

<name>Vienna</name> <population year="94">1583000</population> </city>

</province> ...

name::Vienna is satisfied by a part of it

<name>Vienna</name>.

15

Example (Heterogeneity)

<author><name>Adam Dingle</name></author>

<author name="A. Dingle" ></author> <article id="3"> @inproceedings{IMN97, author="Adam Dingle and Ed

MacNair and Thao Nguyen", … </article>

author:name:Dingle misses the last one.

16

Query Answer Candidate

Query Answer Candidate for the query Q(t_1,t_2,...,t_m), is a Most preferred satisfying collection of

trees (P_1,P_2,...,P_m) Precise : smallest enclosing

Adequate : optional search terms satisfied as much as possible

17

Query Answer

Query Answer for the query Q(t_1,t_2,...,t_m), is a Query Answer Candidate

(P_1,P_2,...,P_m) in which Trees P_i’s are Interconnected

Specifies trees related to the same “real-world” entity

18

Interconnectedness (Cohen et al)

Two subtrees T_a and T_b are said to be interconnected if the path from their roots to the lowest common ancestor does not contain two distinct nodes with the same element, or the only distinct nodes with the same element are these roots.

19

Interconnectedness (Li et al)

Two subtrees T_a and T_b are said to be interconnected, if the path from T_a's root to their lowest common ancestor in the tree does not contain another node that is the lowest common ancestor of T_a and a distinct subtree T_b‘ , where T_b' has the same root element label as T_b.

20

Interconnectedness (Two Approaches)

21

Implementation Details (How?)

22

Tools Used

Apache Lucene 2.0 APIs in Java A high-performance, text search

engine library with smart indexing strategies.

Further tuned for memory-centric operation in contrast with disk-centric defaults

SAXParser APIs

23

Mapping to Lucene

XML documents to Lucene documents for indexingXML keyword-based queries to Lucene queries for searchingENCODING XML fragment of an XML document is

referred to internally using the filename and the XPath (of the XML fragment's root from the XML document root)

24

Evaluation and Application (Why?)

25

ExperimentsDATASETs: Sigmod, Mondial, and DBLP.

PLATFORMS: For Sigmod and Mondial datasets: HP xw9300

Workstation with 2 GHz AMD Opteron dual-core processor (270), 4 GB of main memory, and 250 GB 7200 rpm hard drive, running 32-bit Windows XP.

(java -Xms750M -Xmx1500M). For DBLP dataset: SUN Ultra-40 Workstation with 2.4

GHz dual AMD Opteron dual-core processor (280), 8GB of main memory, and 250GB 7500 rpm hard drive, running 64-bit Solaris 10.

(java -Xms1000M -Xmx3600M).

26

Dataset Sizes

DATASET SIZE

Sigmod 468 KB

Mondial 1743 KB

DBLP 337 MB

27

Dataset Indexing via Lucene

DATASET INDEXING TIME

INDEX SIZE

Sigmod 32 sec 6 MB

Mondial 180 sec 16 MB

DBLP 36 hrs 4 GB

28

Query Answer: Computation Time vs Display Time

DATASET SIMPLE QUERY

COMPLEXQUERY

Sigmod 35 ms / 1 sec

400 ms / 3 min

Mondial 25 ms / 350 ms

1 sec / 2 min

DBLP 335 ms / 1 sec

---

29

More Subtle Example

In Extended Paper: A Coherent Keyword-Based

XML Query Language

30

Pubs.xml

<publications>- <book>  <title>Modern Information Retrieval</title>   <author>Ricardo Baeza-Yates</author>   <author>Berthier Ribeiro-Neto</author> - <chapter>  <title>Digital Libraries</title>   <author>Edward A. Fox</author>   <author>Ohm Sornil</author>   </chapter>  </book>- <article>  <title>The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine</title>   <author>Sergey Brin</author>   <author>Lawrence Page</author>   </article>- <article>  <title>An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping</title>   <author>M.F.Porter</author>   </article>- <article> <title>Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis</title>   </article>  </publications>

31

Characteristics of Pubs.xml

Total number of authors = 7Total number of titles = 5

Title Distribution = 1 book (with 1 chapter) + [3 articles] Author Distribution =

2 ( 2 ) + [ 2 + 1 + 0 ]

32

Queries to Pubs.xml (Answer counts)

Arbitrary mix and match of authors and titles = 7 * 5 = 35

author::, title:: (8 hits)+author::, +title:: (7 hits)+author::, +title::, +author:: (4 hits)

33

Completeness ( ::pWord, ::qWord) (Guo et al)

34

Conclusions

35

Developed declarative semantics for keyword-based XML Query language with an effective query answering algorithmDeveloped a notion of interconnectedness that provides coherent answersImplemented using Lucene 2.0 APIs Indexing: Time and Space Intensive

But Query Answering: Quick

36

THANK YOU!