1 © EURIDICE Consortium 2008 Kick Off Meeting Island of San Servolo - Venice, Italy 11th to 13th February 2008 Euridice Project Overview Paolo Paganelli Insiel
Dec 21, 2015
1© EURIDICE Consortium 2008
Kick Off Meeting
Island of San Servolo - Venice, Italy11th to 13th February 2008
Euridice Project Overview
Paolo PaganelliInsiel
2© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Agenda● Vision● Objectives● Approach● Workplan overview
3© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Some words about the acronym● It has not been chosen for its mythological meaning or appeal
● or lack of appeal. At the proposal beginning a potential partner said: “it has a nice sound, but a sinister meaning for a transport project”.
● ..they stayed potential.● It as been chosen because of I.D. and the I.C.
● Inter-Disciplinary research● on Intelligent Cargo
● We started from two basic considerations:● There are technology developments out there that could bring about
a paradigm reversal in logistics: making the cargo itself an active part of the information flow.
● To bring about this change, different disciplines must be involved: various branches of ICT, logistics, economics and business modelling.
4© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
The Intelligent Cargo vision“In five years time, most of the goods flowing through European freight corridors will be ‘intelligent’, i.e.: self-aware, context-aware and connected through a global telecommunication network to support a wide range of information services for logistic operators, industrial users and public authorities.”
● Self-awareness means the ability of cargo to interact with the surrounding environment to actively notify its presence, identity and requirements. An intelligent cargo item will be an active provider of information services, notifying to the interested users and systems its details, position and related events as they occur.
● Context-awareness means intelligent ad hoc combination of information from all the involved stakeholders (shippers, logistic services providers, infrastructures and authorities), based on the current cargo position and status. An intelligent cargo item will “understand” its context in terms of interacting entities (vehicle, user, infrastructure), related information services and available combinations of services to solve specific user needs.
● Connectivity of moving goods means their constant availability as service consumers or providers by exploiting at need the mobile and fixed network infrastructures available along the route. Integration of intelligent cargo into service oriented architectures including mobile user and vehicle devices will make freight control virtually ubiquitous.
5© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
How it should work
RFID
Car
rier
Ser
vice
s
Site services
Vehicl
e
Servic
es
Mobile U
ser
services
Positioning
Services
GPS,Galileo
Car
rier
Ser
vice
s
Shipper servi
ces Infrastructure
Services
Producer services
Public Authorities services
Example: Check/Inspectionat land terminal
RFID
Car
rier
Ser
vice
s
Site services
Vehicl
e
Servic
es
Mobile U
ser
services
Positioning
Services
GPS,Galileo
Car
rier
Ser
vice
s
Shipper servi
ces Infrastructure
Services
Producer services
Public Authorities services
Certify originand transit rights
Identify shipment
Qualify content
Verify customs authorisationsCargo-centric Information
Services InfrastructureUser and context
specific interaction
ServicesCombination
on the fly
6© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
How it is done● Cargo Connectivity is realized by adapting and integrating state-of-the-art identification, communication
and networking technology into an Intelligent Cargo Integration Framework (ICIF), including:● Identification through RFID tags readers/writers or barcode readers.● Positioning through GNSS (GPS or Galileo) devices, as well as GPRS-based localization. ● Mobile devices embedded into a network infrastructure that host local services for identification, data observation and
manipulation.● Middleware architecture including proxy functionality for information system backbone and data interchange.● Security infrastructure.● Flexible mobile radio transceiver by means of software defined radio technologies.
● Cargo Intelligence (CI) services and technologies for gathering, storing, analyzing, and providing access to cargo data to help users make better decisions. CI applications support the activities of centralized and distributed decision support based on:
● Semantic web and domain ontologies, for automated knowledge discovery and identification of services associated to any specific cargo item, context and user request.
● Advanced context technologies, for combination of item, vehicle and user IDs with automatically-detected conditions like, e.g., position and status of cargo.
● Distributed intelligent agents, for optimisation, anomaly and threats detection (alerting) and distributed real-time decisions support.
● Analysis of collected cargo data based on deep and shallow reasoning methods, query and reporting, online analytical processing (OLAP), statistical analysis, data, text and web mining, time series analysis for forecasting and trend detection, complex visualisation and reporting.
● Cargo Services Infrastructure is realized by adapting current SOA standards to the specific needs of moving goods and cargo communities, including:
● Mobile and fixed services support, allowing hybrid setup of mobile (field user) and fixed (back-office, 3rd party) use cases,
● Infrastructure services, supporting scalability, for infrastructure setups of different shapes and sizes, and wireless connectivity, for virtual omnipresence of cargo identification, context information and the related information services.
● Orchestration, supporting the combination of services for specific cargo management scenarios.
7© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Architecture starting point
MobileDevice
CargoItem
Vehicle
Fie
ld U
sers
Bac
k-of
fice
Use
rs
Stakeholders Systems
Industry(ERP, SCM,SCE, WMS)
LogistcOperators
(Transportation Planning,Monitoring, Track & Trace)
Authorities& Infrastructures
(Control, AuthorizationTerminal Management)
Mob
ile A
pplic
atio
ns
Cargo Connectivity
Cargo Intelligence
Services Platform
RFID Rx / Tx GNSS Rx GPRS Rx/Tx WLAN Rx/Tx
short range (ZigBee, WiBree)
Software-definedRadio Technologies
Context Determination Knowledge Discovery
Authentication& Authorisation
Security
OrchestrationInfrastructure servicesFixed servicesMobile services
Car
goA
gent
s
Distributed data analysis ..
..
8© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Euridice Impact Objectives● Enhanced and widespread capability to monitor, trace and
safely handle moving goods at the required level of detail, from full shipments to individual packages or items.
● Increased efficiency of transportation networks, by improving synchronization between logistic users, operators and control authorities.
● Improved sustainability of logistic systems, by reducing their impact on local communities in terms of traffic congestion and pollution.
9© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Euridice Scientific and Technological Objectives● Obj 1.1: To provide a pan-European ICT infrastructure for intelligent
cargo items and mobile users to be identified, localized and connected through local and distributed communication facilities.
● Obj 1.2: To provide a fixed and mobile web services infrastructure for public and private stakeholders to access and use the information they need on a cargo item at any point along its route across European corridors, connecting the cargo with back-office and field staff.
● Obj 1.3: To provide for “on the fly” combination of services to address specific user/cargo/context interactions based on the concept of service oriented architectures.
● Obj 1.4: To provide for intelligent cargo solutions based on distributed and centralized data gathering, detection, analysis and prediction tools.
● Obj 1.5: To provide for an interoperability platform allowing the main actors on the field to expose and use intelligent cargo information services by linking these to their information systems.
10© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Euridice Business and Societal Objectives● Obj 2.1: To realize more flexible and efficient supply chains
through the integration of intelligent cargo concepts into leading logistic operators and industrial organizations.
● Obj 2.2: To increase the efficiency, transparency and cost-effectiveness of intermodal transport.
● Obj 3.1: To provide the necessary business models for an intelligent cargo infrastructure to be established, sustained and fed with appropriate information.
● Obj 3.2: To realize more secure and environment friendly transport chains through the adoption of intelligent cargo to support modal shift and door-to-door intermodal services.
11© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Project Structure
Dissemina-tion and
Outreach(WP33)
Framework Architecture
(WP11)
P1 Intelligent Cargo Integration Framework
Domain Knowledge
(WP12)
Services Authoring, Orchestra-tion (WP14)
P3 Impact Creation
P0 Program Management, Coordination, Performance Monitoring
P2 Pilot Applications
Industry/Distribution applications (WP23)
Business Modelling
(WP31)
Training(WP32)
Exploitation(WP34)
Cargo Intelligence
(WP13)
Obj 1.1 Network infrastructure for intelligent cargo
Obj 1.2 Fixed and mobile web services infrastructure
Obj 1.3 "On the fly" combination of services for cargo/context interaction
Bu
sin
ess
and
So
cie
tal
Ob
jec
tiv
es
Pilo
ts A
sses
smen
t (W
P22
)
Obj 2.1 More flexible and efficient supply chains
Obj 2.2 More efficient, transparent and cost-effective intermodal transport
Obj 3.1 Public-private partnership models for intelligent cargo infrastructure
Intermodal transport (WP24)
Logistic Operators (WP25)
Authorities and Infrastructures (WP26)Obj 3.2 More secure and environment friendly transport chains
Pla
tform
Inte
gra
tion
(WP
21)
Obj 1.5 Interoperability platform for intelligent cargo users
Obj 1.4 Distributed and centralized analysis, prediction and detection
S/T
Ob
jec
tiv
es
12© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Concurrent development approach between P1 and P2
General EURIDICE
requirements
Intelligent Cargo
Integration Framework
Pilots in operation
(start without EURIDICE)
Existing technology solutions
WP11High-level
Architecture
WP11Conceptual Integration
WP11Architecture
Decomposition
WP12Technology
DevelopmentsWP13Technology
DevelopmentsWP14Technology
Developments
WP11
Evaluation and
Guidance
P1 P2
WP21Platform
Integration
WP26Authorities Infrastruct.WP25
Logistic operatorWP24
Intermodal transportWP23
Industrial applications
WP22pilot cross case
analysis
Concept &Technology Domain
Competitiveness & Innovation Impact
Result (with EURIDICE)
WP
22 F
eedb
ack
/ inf
orm
atio
n
man
agem
ent
WP22Pilots preparation
& assessment
Pro
gre
ss
/ T
ime
Pro
gre
ss
/ T
ime
13© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Milestones and results (months 1 to 18)Mile-stoneNo.
Milestone NameWorkpa-ckage(s)Involved
Lead benefi-ciary
Delivery date
Means of verification
M6 Project foundations WP11, WP12, WP22, WP23,
WP24, WP25, WP26Insiel
Month 6
Availability and evaluation of:-High level architecture overview.-Knowledge sources in the transportation and connected logistics domains.-Plan of pilot experimentation and assessment-Pilot Scenarios descriptions.
M12Technical and business context characterization
WP12, WP13, WP14, WP22, WP31
SingularLogic Month 12
Availability and evaluation of:-Data sources definition.-Wireless Connectivity Characterisation.-EURIDICE Context Model.-Pilots assessment methodology.-Analysis of pilot business models.
M18Architectural and methodological framework.
WP11, WP12, WP13, WP14, WP21, WP22, WP23, WP24, WP25, WP26
LogicaCMG
Month 18
Availability and evaluation of:-detailed architecture and platform integration guidelines.-Data gathering, cleaning, fusion and pre-processing prototypes.-Mobile, Fixed, System and Communication Services Definition.-EURIDICE Methodological Framework.-Formalised Domain Knowledge.-Pilots assessment and final requirements.
14© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Milestones and results (months 19 to 36)Mile-stoneNo.
Milestone NameWorkpa-ckage(s)Involved
Lead benefi-ciary
Delivery date
Means of verification
M24 Frameworkcomponents release
WP11, WP12,WP13, WP14,WP21, WP23, WP24, WP25, WP26, WP31,
WP32
Insiel Month 24
Availability and evaluation of:-Intelligent Cargo conceptual framework and interoperability platform.-Data-mining, web-mining, text-mining and offline anomalies detection prototypes.-Technologies for Wireless Connectivity, Services and Orchestration.-Basic user applications and integrated platform first release.-EURIDICE Data Models.-Pilot applications design.-Reference business models.-Training modules and internal training workshops.
M30 Demonstrators
WP13, WP21, WP23, WP24,WP25, WP26,WP32, WP34
Insiel Month 30
Availability and evaluation of:-Advanced user applications and integrated platform final release.-Pilot demonstrator systems.-Public training workshops.-EURIDICE Exploitation Workshops.
M36Validated results and way forward
WP22, WP23, WP24, WP25, WP26, WP31, WP32, WP33,
WP34
CeTIM Month 36
Availability and evaluation of:-Pilots final assessment and validated methodologies and subsystems.-Pilot feedback and evaluation.-Business models validation results.-Training evaluation.-EURIDICE closing event at international conference.-Joint and Single Exploitation Plans.
15© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Project GANTT (1/2)
16© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Project GANTT (2/2)
17© EURIDICE Consortium 2008 P. Paganelli, Insiel -11/2/2008
Conclusions● Strengths
● Strong competencies in the consortium, including technology leaders.● Multi-disciplinary approach.
● Weaknesses● Complex workplan.● Challenging objectives.
● Opportunities● Key technology progresses in areas related to EURIDICE.● Attention paid by important business and government players.
● Threats● Mismatch between different visions of the project: our success depends on both user
value and technology innovation.
“Value without innovation works on an incremental scale .. not sufficient to make you stand out in the marketplace.Innovation without value tends to be technology-driven .. often shooting beyond what buyers are ready to accept and pay for.” Kim, W. Chan, Mauborgne, R., « Blue Ocean Strategy », Harward Business School Press, 2005