1 Effect of Letter Order on Word Recognition Matt Moore and Sarah Pollom Hanover College.

1

Effect of Letter Order on Word Recognition

Matt Moore and Sarah Pollom

Hanover College

2

Original Cambridge Study

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr

the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit

porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the

wrod as a wlohe.

3

What is known…

• If first and last letter are in correct order it does not affect our comprehension of a word – We do not read every letter of a word – Exterior letters serving as visual cues

• Masking and Swapping

– (McCusker, Gough, & Bias, 1981; Rawlinson, 1976)

• Jumbled words – i.e. hatospil, inmcoes, pintaet – (Oliver, Healy, & Mross, 2005)

4

Research Objective

• First, we are testing whether or not both the first and lest letter play a role in word recognition.

• Second, we are testing whether the first or last letter plays a more significant role in word recognition.

5

Design

• 2 x 4 repeated-measures design – Two independent variables

• Congruency • Letter Order

6

Hypotheses

• Congruency

– Faster reaction times for congruent versus incongruent conditions

• Letter order – Normal and first and last letter in correct order

will produce the fastest reaction times – First letter only and last letter only in correct

order will produce the slower reaction times

7

Method

• Participants

– 23 undergraduate students

– 65% female, 35% male

– 100% Caucasian

– Range in age from 18-22 years old

– All claimed to be color normal

8

Materials

• Gateway computers w/ 14-inch LCD monitors – Operated by Windows XP

• Java 2 program – Accessed through Internet Explorer – Entitled the Stroop Experiment– http://psych.hanover.edu/classes/Cognition/ps

y333.html

9

Stimuli

• 8 different stimuli – Congruent or Incongruent – Correct letter order, first and last in correct

order, first letter only in correct order, last letter only in correct order

– Black background– Central word orientation – 16-point font size– Using yellow, orange, purple as the colors

10

Stimulus One

Congruent and correct letter order

11

Stimulus Two

Incongruent and correct letter order

12

Stimulus Three

Congruent and first and last letter in correct order

13

Stimulus Four

Incongruent and first and last letter in correct order

14

Stimulus Five

Congruent and first letter in correct order

15

Stimulus Six

Incongruent and first letter in correct order

16

Stimulus Seven

Congruent and last letter in correct order

17

Stimulus Eight

Incongruent and last letter in correct order

18

Procedure

• Participants completed all eight conditions (in any order) – Using the following settings:

• 25 Trials• Responding to the color by pressing the

relevant buttons at the bottom of the screen or by pressing the following keys: y for yellow, p for purple, and o for orange. (rework)

19

Results

0

500

1000

1500

Letter Order

Mean

Reacti

on

Tim

e (

ms)

Congruent

Incongruent

Congruency F (1,22) = 40.381, p = 0.0

No main effect of letter order

Interaction F (3,66) = 3.722, p = 0.016

20

Discussion

• Our hypothesis supported the original Cambridge study.

• Our hypothesis did not support the (Oliver et al, 2005) study.– First letter only or last letter only did not

have slower reaction times • Letters not really jumbled/lack of sensitivity • Can’t really make another word out of the

colors (Andrews, 1996)

21

Limitations

• Effect of Practice– Completed 8 conditions (knew to only

look at color)

– Some participants had more familiarity with Stroop Effect

• Faulty Reaction Times

22

References• Andrew, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection

processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(6), 775-800.

• McCusker, L., Gough, P., & Bias, R. (1981). Word recognition inside out and outside in. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(3), 538-551.

• Oliver, W., Healy, A., & Mross, E. (2005). Trade-offs in detecting letters and comprehending text.

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(3), 159-167.

• Rawlinson, G.E. (1976). The significance of letter position in word recognition. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Psychology Department, University of Nottingham, Nottingham UK.