Page 1
ABSTRAC:
Concrete is the most commonly used construction material
worldwide. Concrete is a brittle, composite material that is
strong in compression and weak in tension. Cracking occurs
when the tensile stress produced from the externally applied
loads, temperature changes, or shrinkage in a member reaches
the tensile strength of the material. The fiber reinforced
concrete (FRC) contains randomly distributed short discrete
fibers which act as internal reinforcement so as to enhance the
properties of the concrete. In this paper compare and analyses
of steer & polypropylene fibers reinforced concrete with plain
concrete. Finally conclusion from result is presented.
Key words: Fiber, FRC, toughness, steel, compression,
tensile strength.
INTRODUCTION
Fiber reinforced concrete can be defined as composite
material consisting of cement mortar or concrete and
discontinuous, discrete, uniformly dispersed fibers. The
continuous meshes, woven fabrics and long wires or rods are
considered to be discrete fibers.
The inclusion of fibers in concrete and shotcrete generally
improves material properties including ductility, toughness,
flexural strength, impact resistance, fatigue resistance, and to
a small degree, compressive strength. The type and amount of
improvement is dependent upon the fiber type, size, strength
and configuration and of fiber
.
REINFORCEMENT MECHANISAM IN FRC
In the hardened state, when fibers are properly bonded,
they interact with the matrix at the level of micro-cracks and
effectively bridge these cracks thereby providing stress
transfer media that delays their coalescence and unstable
growth. If the fiber volume fraction is sufficiently high, this
may result in an increase in the tensile strength of the matrix.
Indeed, for some high volume fraction fiber composite, a
notable increase in the tensile/flexural strength over and
above the plain matrix has been reported. Once the tensile
capacity of the composite is reached, and coalescence and
conversion of micro-cracks to macro-cracks has occurred,
fibers, depending on their length and bonding characteristics
continue to restrain crack opening and crack growth by
effectively bridging across macro-cracks. This post peak
macro-crack bridging is the primary reinforcement
mechanisms in majority of commercial fiber reinforced
concrete composites.
Figure 1
THE CONCEPT OF THE TOUGHNES:
Toughness is defined as the area under a load-deflection (or
stress-strain) curve. As can be seen from Figure, adding fibres to
concrete greatly increases the toughness of the material.
That is, fiber-reinforced concrete is able to sustain load at
deflections or strains much greater than those at which cracking first
appears in the matrix.
Figure 2
METHODOLOGY:
1. Mix Design of concrete as per IRC 44: 2008.
2. Mix Design of SFRC as per IRC SP: 46-1997.
3. Check out compressive strength of mixes with
compression test carried out on cubes.
4. Check out Flexural Strength of beams with flexural
testing machine.
5. Check out Modulus of Elasticity of Cubes with
modulus of elasticity testing machine
SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE:
Conduct experimental and analytical investigation to
characterize principal mechanical properties of FRC and to
study the effect of volume fraction and length of fibers on the
mechanical properties.
For the measurement of workability of the FRC, following
tests are used.
1. Slump test- subsidence in mm
2. Inverted slump test-time in seconds
3. Compacting factor test-degree of compaction
Effect of addition of fiber in concrete Ajay Vitthal Shinde
1, Dr.Sunil Rangari.
2
1P.G.Student. Saraswati College of engineering, Kharghar, Maharashtra, India.
[email protected] 2Dr. Sunil Rangari, college of engineering, Kharghar, Maharashtra, India.
[email protected]
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 12, December-2015 ISSN 2229-5518 253
IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org
IJSER
Page 2
4. VB test-time in seconds
For the mechanical properties, the following tests are
conducted to study the effect of amount of fibers and the
length of fibers on the compressive, tensile and flexure
strength and the associated straining capacity.
1) Compressive Strength of concrete Cubes (IS 516-1959).
2) Split Tensile Strength of concrete Cubes (IS 5816-1999)
3) Flexure Strength of concrete beams under two point
loading (IS 516-1959)
MATERIAL:
Cement:
Ordinary Portland cement of grade 53 by the manufacturer
ultratech was used.
Aggregate:
Course aggregate of maximum size 10 mm is used I.e. only
M1 is used as per IRC: SP: 46-1997. Fine aggregate
comprised of crushed sand only.
Admixture:
Super plasticizer was use to increase the workability of
fresh prepared concrete.
Water:
Water is an important ingredient of concrete and it initiates
chemical reaction with cement. Ordinary potable water is
used.
CLASSIFICATION OF FIBERS:
FIBER DIA
MM
DENSITY
KG/M3
YOUNGS
MODULUS
OF
ELASTICIT
Y
MPA
TENSILE
STRENGTH
MPA
Asbestos 0.02 – 20 2.55–3.37 164 – 196 3100 – 3500
Carbon 3 1.9 230 – 380 1800– 2800
Polypropyle
ne
20 – 200 0.9 5000 500
Nylon Over 4 1.14 4000 900
Kevlar 10-12 1.44 69-133 2900
Glass 9 – 15 2.6 80,000 2000-4000
Steel 5 – 500 7.8 200,000 1000-3000
STRENGTH:
The strength of the fiber reinforced concrete can be
measured in terms of its maximum resistance when subjected
to compressive, tensile, and flexural and shear loads. In field
conditions, usually some combination of these loads is
imposed; however for evaluation purposes, the behavior is
characterized under one type of loading without the
interaction of other loads. The strength under each individual
type of loading is a useful indicator of the FRC material's
performance characteristic for design consideration.
COMPRESSION:
The compressive properties of fiber-reinforced concrete
(FRC) are relatively less affected by the presence of fibers as
compared to the properties under tension and bending.
Figure 3
FLEXURAL:
There are a number of factors that influence the behavior
and strength of FRC in flexure. These include: type of fiber,
fiber length (L), aspect ratio (L/df) where df is the diameter of
the fiber, the volume fraction of the fiber (Vf), fiber
orientation and fiber shape, fiber bond characteristics (fiber
deformation). Also, factors that influence the workability of
FRC such as W/C ratio, density, air content and the like could
also influence its strength. The ultimate strength in flexure
could vary considerably depending upon the volume fraction
of fibers, length and bond characteristics of the fibers and the
ultimate strength of the fibers.
Figure 3
TENSILE & SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH:
Most investigations in the field of FRC derive tensile
properties of the composite indirectly on the basis of
observations from flexural tests or split cylinder tests. This is
because there are difficulties associated with the
interpretation of results obtained from direct tension tests.
The difficulties are due to differences in specimen sizes,
specimen shapes, instrumentation and methods of
measurement. The stress-strain or load-elongation response
of fiber composites in tension depends mainly on the volume
fraction of fibers. In general, the response can be divided into
two or three stages, respectively, depending on whether the
composite is FRC (fiber volume less than about 3%) or Slurry
Infiltrated (SIFCON) where the volume of fibers normally
varies between 5% and 25%.
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 12, December-2015 ISSN 2229-5518 254
IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org
IJSER
Page 3
Figure 4
TEST APPARATUS:
Test apparatus are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 are
compression testing machine & flexural strength testing machine.
MIXING PROCEDURE:
Following procedure was followed while preparation of FRC
1. Dry mix of coarse aggregate, fine aggregate and cement in
mixture for 2 min.
2. Fiber is added after it and mixing continued for 2 min.
3. Calculated water is added to the mixer to achieve uniform
mixing and mix for 2 min.
4. Total mixing time shall be around 5 - 7 min.
RESULT:
Compression test:
No Mix Compressive
strength
(7 days)
N/mm2
Compressive
strength
(28 days)
N/mm2
1 Steel fiber
(80/60)
43.13 53.5
2 Steel fiber
(50/35 & 30)
36.8 53.3
3 Polypropelene 35.7 52.8
4 Plain concrete 35 49.1
Flexural strength of beam:
No Mix Flexural
strength
(7 days)
N/mm2
Flexural
strength
(28 days)
N/mm2
1 Steel fiber
(80/60)
8.6 10.2
2 Steel fiber
(50/35 & 30)
6.4 7.6
3 Polypropelene 5.2 6.6
4 Plain concrete 6.2 6
Split tensile strength of concrete cube:
No Mix Split tensile strength
(28 days) N/mm2
1 Steel fiber
(80/60)
6.77
2 Steel fiber
(50/35 & 30)
6.01
3 Polypropelene 5.1
4 Plain concrete 3.15
Load deflection curve for beam:
Figure 5
Load deflection curve for plain concrete:
Figure 6
CONCLUSION:
1. Fiber reinforced concrete give more tensile strength
than plain concrete.
2. FRC controls cracking and deformation under impact
load much better than plain concrete and increased
the impact strength 25 times.
3. Fiber addition improves ductility of concrete and its
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 12, December-2015 ISSN 2229-5518 255
IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org
IJSER
Page 4
post-cracking load-carrying capacity.
4. Use of fiber produces more closely spaced cracks and
reduces crack width. Fibers bridge cracks to resist
deformation.
REFERENCES
[1] Nataraja M. C., Dhang N and Gupta, “Fiber Reinforced
Concrete”, Indian Concrete Journal , Vol. 75, No. 4,
April 2,001, A. P (1998), ‘Steel Fiber Reinforced
Concrete under Compression’, The Indian Concrete
Journal , Vol. 72, No. 7, July 1998, pp.
[2] Nataraja M. C., Dhang N. and Gupta, A. P ., “A Study on
the Behaviour of Steel Fiber Reinforced Subjected to
Splitting Test”, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering ,
Teheran, Iran, Vol. 1, No. 1, Jan. 2000, pp. 1-11.C. Y. Lin,
M. Wu, J. A. Bloom, I. J. Cox, and M. Miller, “Rotation,
scale, and translation resilient public watermarking for
images,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 10, no. 5, pp.
767-782, May 2001.
[3] Nataraja, M. C., Dhang, N and Gupta, A. P (1999).
‘Stress-strain Curves for Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete
in Compression’, Cement and Concrete Composites. [4] Bakis C. E., Bank L. C., ASCE F., Brown V. L., ASCE
M., Cosenza E., Davalos J. F., ASCE A. M., Lesko J. J.,
Machida A., “Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites for
Construction” American society of civil engineer Vol.
6,No. 2, May 1, 2002. ©ASCE, ISSN
1090-0268/2002/2-73–87
[5] Properties and Applications of Fiber Reinforced
Concrete JKAU: Eng. Sci., Vol. 2, pp. 49-6~ (1410
A.H./19lJlI A.D.)
[6] Ravindra V. Solanki, Prof. Mishra C. B., Dr. Umrigar F.
S., Prof. Sinha D. A. USE OF STEEL FIBER IN
CONCRETE PAVEMENT: A REVIEW National
Conference on Recent Trends in Engineering &
Technology 13-14 May 2011
[7] Sravana1 P., Srinivasa Rao P., Chandramouli K.,
Seshadri T., Sekhar and Sarika P., SOME STUDIES ON
FLEXURAL BEHAVIOUR OF GLASS FIBRE
REINFORCED CONCRETE MEMBERS 36th
Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures
Singapore, August 14-16, 2011
[8] Some Studies on Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete
International Journal of Emerging Technology and
Advanced Engineering (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO
9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1, January
2013) Amit Rana1.
[9] Flexural Design of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete by Chote
Soranakom and Barzin Mobasher ACI MATERIALS
JOURNAL TECHNICAL PAPER September-October
2009
[10] Colin D. Johnston, “Fiber reinforced cements and
concretes” Advances in concrete technology volume 3 –
Gordon and Breach Science publishes – 2001.
[11] IS 10262-2009: Mix Design of concrete.
[12] .IRC SP: 46-1997: Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete for
Pavements.
[13] Testing of SFRC - ACI 544.
[14] ACI Committee 544. 1988. Design Considerations for
Steel Fiber Reinforced.
[15] ACI Committee 544. 1990. State-of-the-Art Report on
Fiber Reinforced Concrete.
[16] ACI Committee 544. 1993. Guide for Specifying,
Proportioning, Mixing, Placing, and Finishing Steel
Fiber Reinforced Concrete .
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 12, December-2015 ISSN 2229-5518 256
IJSER © 2015 http://www.ijser.org
IJSER