1 Complaint

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE UNDER THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT ETC. Page 2

government decision-making. Petitioner is suing on its own behalf and for its own benefit, and on

behalf of and for the benefit of its members, all persons similarly situated, all taxpayers within the

geographical jurisdiction of COUNTY.

2. Respondent COUNTY is a local agency under Section 54951 of the Government Code.

Respondent’s Board of Supervisors is a legislative body under Section 54952 of the Government Code,

and members of the Board of Supervisors are compensated for their service on the Board.

3. The true names and capacities of the Respondents identified as DOES 1 through 100 and

Real Parties in Interest identified as DOES 101 through 10,000 are unknown to Petitioner, who will

seek the Court’s permission to amend this pleading in order to allege the true names and capacities as

soon as they are ascertained. Each of the fictitiously named Respondents 1 through 100 has jurisdiction

by law over one or more aspects of the action that is being challenged in this proceeding and each of

the fictitiously named Real Parties in Interest 101 through 10,000 either is a party to the challenged

action or has some other cognizable interest in the action.

Background Information

4. In general, Petitioner opposes all discussions that took place and all actions taken by

Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors at its regular meeting on June 26, 2012, including but

not limited to action taken on budget deliberations for Respondent’s Fiscal Years 2012-13 and 2013-14

because of violations of the Ralph M. Brown Act (“Brown Act”), GOV’T CODE § 54950 et seq. The

specific actions being challenged in this proceeding are (i) Respondent COUNTY’s failure to post the

agenda for the regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors on June 26, 2012, on COUNTY’s website

for the entire 72-hour period prior to the meeting; and (ii) COUNTY’s refusal to allow members of the

public to address the Board of Supervisors concerning Item 23 on the agenda for the regular meeting

of the Board of Supervisors on June 26, 2012.

5. Rule 2 of Respondent COUNTY’s Board Of Supervisors Rules Of Procedure states in

part as follows: “Each agenda shall be posted at the South Entrance of the First Floor of the San Diego

County Administration Center and on the bulletin board located at the North Chamber (Room 310),

Third Floor, County Administration Center. Copies of the agenda, agenda back-up material, Board of

Supervisors Policies, Board of Supervisors Rules of Procedure, and Statements of Proceedings shall be

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


available in the Office of the Clerk and on the County’s Internet Web Site. The agenda shall be made

available to the Chairperson of each Planning Group, Sponsor Group, community newspaper and daily

newspaper. The Clerk of the Board is directed to use the most efficient and cost effective means to

make the agenda available. The primary means of distribution shall be through the County Internet Web

Site, followed by electronic mail, followed by facsimile (fax) transmission, and followed by United

States Postal Mail Service. * * *” Rule 2 was in effect from June 11-26, 2012. A true and correct copy

of the Board of Supervisors Rules of Procedure is attached to this pleading as Exhibit “A.”

6. A true and correct copy of the paper version of the agenda posted by Respondent

COUNTY at the County Administration Center for the June 26, 2012 regular meeting of the Board of

Supervisors (“Paper Agenda”) is attached to this pleading as Exhibit “B.”

7. A true and correct copy of the electronic version of the agenda posted by Respondent

COUNTY on its Internet website for the June 26, 2012 regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors

(“Internet Agenda”) is attached to this pleading as Exhibit “C.”

Jurisdiction

8. Government Code Section 54960.1(a) provides as follows: “The district attorney or any

interested person may commence an action by mandamus or injunction for the purpose of obtaining a

judicial determination that an action taken by a legislative body of a local agency in violation of Section

54953, 54954.2, 54954.5, 54954.6, 54956, or 54956.5 is null and void under this section. Nothing in

this chapter shall be construed to prevent a legislative body from curing or correcting an action

challenged pursuant to this section.”

9. Petitioner is an “interested person” within the meaning of Government Code Section

54960.1.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION:Violation of the Ralph M. Brown Act--Action on Items Not Appearing on Internet Agenda

(Against All Respondents and Real Parties in Interest)

10. Paragraphs 1 through 9 are fully incorporated into this paragraph.

11. Government Code Section 54954.2(a)(1) provides in part as follows: “At least 72 hours

before a regular meeting, the legislative body of the local agency, or its designee, shall post an agenda

containing a brief general description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


meeting, including items to be discussed in closed session. A brief general description of an item

generally need not exceed 20 words. The agenda shall specify the time and location of the regular

meeting and shall be posted in a location that is freely accessible to members of the public and on the

local agency’s Internet Web site, if the local agency has one.”

12. Government Code Section 54954.2(a)(2) provides in part as follows: “No action or

discussion shall be undertaken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except that members

of a legislative body or its staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons

exercising their public testimony rights under Section 54954.3.”

13. Respondent COUNTY has a dedicated Internet website for the agendas of its Board of

Supervisors. The website’s address is www.sdcounty.ca.gov/cob/bosa/index.html, and the page that

appears bears the title of “Board of Supervisors Agenda” (“Dedicated Website”).

14. The Internet Agenda was not accessible on the Dedicated Website at all times during the

72-hour period prior to the June 26, 2012 meeting to which it pertained. In addition:

A. On June 25, 2012, Petitioner caused an e-mail message to be sent to Supervisor

Horn. The message stated” “As you can see from the attachments, the agenda materials for the board’s

meeting on June 26, 2012, are not available on the county’s website.” The message was electronically

delivered to Supervisor Horn’s e-mail “inbox” on June 25, 2012. A true and correct copy of the e-mail

and the non-video attachments to it is attached to this pleading as Exhibit “D.”

B. Petitioner caused a letter alerting Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors

to, among other things, the inaccessibility of the agenda for the June 26, 2012 meeting on the “Board

of Supervisors Agenda” website to be sent to the members of the Board prior to commencement of the

meeting. The letter was received prior to commencement of the meeting. A true and correct copy of

the letter is attached to this pleading as Exhibit “E.”

15. Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors discussed and/or took action on each of

the items appearing on the Internet Agenda.

16. Respondent COUNTY violated the Brown Act on June 26, 2012, when its Board of

Supervisors discussed and/or took action on the items appearing on the Internet Agenda because the

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


Internet Agenda was not available to the public at all times during the 72-hour period prior to the

meeting at which the discussions and/or actions occurred.

17. On June 27, 2012, Petitioner caused a Request to Cure Multiple Violation of Ralph M.

Brown Act to be served on Respondents. A true and correct copy of the request is attached to this

pleading as Exhibit “F.”

18. Petitioner and other members of the public have been harmed as a result of Respondents’

violations of the Brown Act because they have been denied the benefits and protections provided by

compliance with the Act. By way of example and without limitation, Petitioner and other members of

the public were unaware of the items to be discussed or acted on by Respondent COUNTY’s Board of

Supervisors on June 26, 2012, and were therefore unaware of the items to be discussed and/or acted on

and unable to formulate and present comments on items of interest to them.

19. Petitioner has no plain, speedy, adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, since it

(and other members of the public) he will suffer irreparable harm as a result of Respondents’ violations

of the Brown Act and other laws. Respondents’ discussion and/or action on the items appearing on the

Internet Agenda rests on their failure to satisfy a clear, present, ministerial duty to act in accordance

with all applicable laws.

20. Petitioner has a beneficial right and interest in Respondents’ fulfillment of all their legal

duties, as alleged in this pleading.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION:Violation of the Ralph M. Brown Act--Refusal to Allow Public Comment

(Against All Respondents and Real Parties in Interest)

21. Paragraphs 1 through 20 are fully incorporated into this paragraph.

22. Government Code Section 54954.3(a) provides in part as follows: “Every agenda for

regular meetings shall provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the

legislative body on any item of interest to the public, before or during the legislative body’s

consideration of the item, that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body, provided

that no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise

authorized by subdivision (b) of Section 54954.2. However, the agenda need not provide an opportunity

for members of the public to address the legislative body on any item that has already been considered

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


by a committee, composed exclusively of members of the legislative body, at a public meeting wherein

all interested members of the public were afforded the opportunity to address the committee on the item,

before or during the committee’s consideration of the item, unless the item has been substantially

changed since the committee heard the item, as determined by the legislative body.”

23. A true and correct copy of Respondent COUNTY’s statement of proceedings (also

commonly known as “minutes”) for its Fiscal Year 2012-13 budget hearings is attached to this pleading

as Exhibit “G.” In addition:

A. From June 11-20, 2012, Respondent COUNTY purported to hold public hearings

with regard to its proposed Fiscal Year 2012-13 budget. The bodies who held the public hearings

consisted exclusively of the members of COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors.

B. The oral-testimony portion of the public hearings was closed at 2:05 p.m. on June

12, 2012. Members of the public were given permission to submit written testimony on the budget up

until 5:00 p.m. on June 20, 2012; members of the Board of Supervisors and others were authorized to

submit change letters concerning the proposed budget up until 5:00 p.m. on June 20, 2012.

24. On June 21, 2012, Respondent COUNTY’s chief administrative officer prepared for each

member of the Board of Supervisors a binder containing, among other things, the following documents

concerning the proposed Fiscal Year 2012-13 budget: a change letter from the chief administrative

officer (proposing $29.1 million in increased expenditures), a change letter from Supervisor Roberts,,

and each Supervisor’s proposed grant awards under the Community Enhancement Program. A true and

correct copy of the contents of the binder is attached to this pleading as Exhibit “H.” In addition:

A. The budgetary changes proposed by the chief administrative officer in his change

letter were not disclosed to the public or discussed at any public hearing on the proposed Fiscal Year

2012-13 budget prior to June 21, 2012.

B. The budgetary changes proposed by Supervisor Roberts in his change letter were

not disclosed to the public or discussed at any public hearing on the proposed Fiscal Year 2012-13

budget prior to June 21, 2012.

C. The budgetary changes proposed by Supervisors in their respective proposed

grant awards under the Community Enhancement Program were not disclosed to the public or discussed

at any public hearing on the proposed Fiscal Year 2012-13 budget prior to June 21, 2012.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


25. The subject of item 23 at the June 26, 2012 regular meeting of Respondent COUNTY’s

Board of Supervisors, as described in the Paper Agenda (Exhibit “B”), was as follows: “BUDGET

DELIBERATIONS: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER PROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLAN

FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14.” After stating the time at which item 23 would be

considered--namely, at 2:00 p.m.--the Paper Agenda stated as follows: “(Note: Public Hearings on the

Operational Plan took place beginning June 11, 2012 and closed at 5 p.m. on June 20, 2012. There will

be no public testimony for this item at 2 p.m.).”

26. The subject of item 23 at the June 26, 2012 regular meeting of Respondent COUNTY’s

Board of Supervisors, as described in the Internet Agenda (Exhibit “C”), was as follows: “BUDGET

DELIBERATIONS: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER PROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLAN

FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14 CHANGE LETTER (DISTRICTS: ALL).”

27. The Paper Agenda’s and the Internet Agenda’s respective descriptions of the subject of

item 23 at the June 26, 2012 regular meeting of Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors are not

identical.

28. Respondents refused to allow members of the public to comment on the subject of item

23 at the June 26, 2012 regular meeting of Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors. Those

members of the public attended the meeting and desired to address the Board of Supervisors on the

subject of item 23 were allowed to make their comments only during the meeting’s non-agenda

comment period.

29. The subject of item 23 had been substantially changed since the public’s last opportunity

to address the members of Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors concerning the subject on

June 11 and 12, 2012. In particular:

A. The budgetary changes proposed by the chief administrative officer in his change

letter, both in isolation and in conjunction with changes proposed by others, represented a substantial

change triggering the public’s right to address the Board of Supervisors in connection with item 23 at

its regular meeting on June 26, 2012.

B. The budgetary changes proposed by Supervisor Roberts in his change letter, both

in isolation and in conjunction with changes proposed by others, represented a substantial change

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


triggering the public’s right to address the Board of Supervisors in connection with item 23 at its regular

meeting on June 26, 2012.

C. The budgetary changes proposed by Supervisors in their respective proposed

grant awards under the Community Enhancement Program, both in isolation and in conjunction with

changes proposed by others, represented a substantial change triggering the public’s right to address the

Board of Supervisors in connection with item 23 at its regular meeting on June 26, 2012.

30. Respondents failed to make a determination that the subject of item 23 had not changed

substantially since the public’s last opportunity to address the members of Respondent COUNTY’s

Board of Supervisors concerning the subject on June 11 and 12, 2012. Additionally and alternatively,

Respondent’s made a determination that the subject of item 23 had not changed substantially, but the

determination was not supported by substantial evidence. In particular:

A. With regard to the budgetary changes proposed by the chief administrative officer

in his change letter, Respondents failed to make a determination that his changes were not substantial;

or, if the determination was made, it was not supported by substantial evidence.

B. With regard to the budgetary changes proposed by Supervisor Roberts in his

change letter, Respondents failed to make a determination that his changes were not substantial; or, if

the determination was made, it was not supported by substantial evidence.

C. With regard to the budgetary changes proposed by Supervisors in their respective

proposed grant awards under the Community Enhancement Program, Respondents failed to make a

determination that the Supervisors’ changes were not substantial; or, if the determination was made,

it was not supported by substantial evidence.

31. Respondents’ legislative body violated the Brown Act when it issued an agenda for the

June 26, 2012 regular meeting of Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors informing members

of the public that no public testimony would be allowed on item 23 and when it refused to allow

members of the public who attended the meeting to address the Board of Supervisors on item 23 (as

opposed to being allowed to make their comments only during the meeting’s non-agenda comment

period.)

32. Petitioner and other members of the public have been harmed as a result of Respondents’

violations of the Brown Act because they have been denied the benefits and protections provided by

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


compliance with the Act. By way of example and without limitation, Petitioner and other members of

the public were prevented from addressing Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors on June 26,

2012, during its consideration of item 23.

Prayer

FOR ALL THESE REASONS, Petitioner respectfully prays for the following relief against

Respondents and Real Parties in Interest (and any and all other parties who may oppose Petitioner in

this proceeding):

A. On the First Cause of Action:

1. A judgment determining or declaring that Respondents failed to comply fully

with the Brown Act as it relates to the posting of the Internet Agenda and that any and all discussions

and/or actions taken by Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors at its meeting on June 26, 2012,

violated the Act, thus rendering all such discussions and actions null and void;

2. A judgment determining or declaring that Respondents must comply fully with

the Brown Act before any discussion may occur or action may be taken on any of the items discussed

or acted on by Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors at its meeting on June 26, 2012;

3. Injunctive relief prohibiting Respondents from further discussing or taking any

further action (including but not limited to the expenditure of any public funds) in connection with any

of the items discussed or acted on by Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors at its meeting on

June 26, 2012, unless and until Respondents have fully complied with the Brown Act and all other

applicable laws;

4. Issuance of a writ of mandate requiring Respondents to rescind any and all action

taken by Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors at its meeting on June 26, 2012, unless and until

Respondents have fully complied with the Brown Act and all other applicable laws, as determined by

this Court; and

5. Any and all other relief that may be authorized by the Brown Act but is not

explicitly or specifically requested elsewhere in this Prayer.

B. On the Second Cause of Action:

1. A judgment determining or declaring that Respondents failed to comply fully

with the Brown Act with respect to the subject of item 23 at the June 26, 2012 regular meeting of

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors, thus rendering any and all actions on item 23 null and

void;

2. A judgment determining or declaring that Respondents must fully comply with

the Brown Act before any discussion may take place or any action may be taken in connection with the

subject of item 23 at the June 26, 2012 regular meeting of Respondent COUNTY’s Board of

Supervisors;

3. Injunctive relief prohibiting Respondents from discussing or taking any action

(including but not limited to the expenditure of any public funds) in connection with the subject of item

23 at the June 26, 2012 regular meeting of Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors unless and

until they have fully complied with the Brown Act and all other applicable laws;

4. Issuance of a writ of mandate requiring Respondents to rescind any and all action

taken by Respondent COUNTY’s Board of Supervisors in connection with the subject of item 23 at the

June 26, 2012 regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors unless and until Respondents have fully

complied with the Brown Act and all other applicable laws, as determined by this Court; and

5. Any and all other relief that may be authorized by the Brown Act but is not

explicitly or specifically requested elsewhere in this Prayer.

C. On All Causes of Action:

1. All attorney fees and other legal expenses incurred in connection with this

proceeding, including but not limited to reasonable attorney fees as authorized by the Code of Civil

Procedure and the Government Code; and

2. Any and all further relief that this Court may deem appropriate.

Date: July 3, 2012. Respectfully submitted,

BRIGGS LAW CORPORATION

By: ______________________________Cory J. Briggs

Attorneys for Petitioner San Diegans for OpenGovernment

VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE UNDERTHE RALPH M. BROWN ACT AND OTHER LAWS

Exhibit “A”

Your CountyGovernment

CommunityServices

HealthyKids & Families

BusinessResources

Environment Public Safety Jobs

Clerk of the Board ofSupervisors

Clerk of the Board

Meetings of the Board ofSupervisors

Air Pollution ControlHearing Board

Boards, Commissions andCommittees

Community EnhancementApplication

County AdministrationCenter

County Volunteer Program

Disclosure Activities

Notary Public

Official County Documents

Passports

Property Tax AssessmentAppeals

Subdivision Maps

Forms

Local Government Links

Printer Friendly

Rule 1. Time And Place Of Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 1Rule 2. Agenda For Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 2Rule 3. Order Of Business For Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 7Rule 4. Public Participation In Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 10Rule 5. Nomination And Selection Of Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, AndChairperson Pro Tem Of The Board Of Supervisors And State Of The CountyAddress - Page 12Rule 6. Motions During Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 12Rule 7. Retention Of Exhibits And Documentary Material Received In HearingsBefore The Board Of Supervisors - Page 15Rule 8. Conferences Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 16Rule 9. Overruling The Chairperson Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 17Rule 10. Ceremonial Functions And Proclamations - Page 17Rule 11. Suspension Of Rules Of Procedure - Page 17Rule 12. Amendment Of Rules Of Procedure - Page 17Rule 13. Policies To Implement Rules Of Procedure - Page 17Rule 14. Parliamentary Procedure - Page 17

Rule 1. Time And Place Of Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 1

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this Rule, a regular meeting of the Board shall be held onTuesday of each week commencing at the hour of 9:00 a.m. and Wednesday of each weekcommencing at the hour of 9:00 a.m. in the North Chamber (room 310) or Conference rooms(rooms 303 or 335-A), located at the San Diego County Administration Center, 1600 PacificHighway, San Diego, California. The Wednesday meeting is to be known as the Land Usemeeting. No meeting shall commence prior to the time specified in this subsection.

(b) When a Tuesday regular meeting day is a holiday, the Tuesday meeting shall be held onWednesday at the same place at 9:00 a.m. and the Land Use meeting shall be continued toThursday at the same place at 9:00 a.m. When the Land Use meeting day is a holiday, theLand Use meeting shall be held on Thursday at the same place at 9:00 a.m. All matters on theposted agenda for any meeting continued pursuant to this subsection shall be automaticallycontinued to the continued meeting.

(c) The Board may designate legislative activity weeks and Board recess periods during whichregular meetings of the Board will not be held. The Clerk of the Board shall maintain theofficial meeting calendar, and shall post same in the Security Office located at the South Endof the First Floor of the San Diego County Administration Center and on the bulletin boardlocated at the North Chamber (room 310), Third Floor, County Administration Center.

(d) Any meeting of the Board may be adjourned to any date and time when necessary for thetransaction of business. Any adjourned meeting of the Board is part of a regular meeting.

(e) Special meetings of the Board may be called pursuant to and in accordance with Section54956 of the Government Code. The Clerk shall prepare the notice and call of any specialmeeting. The notice shall specify the time and place of the special meeting and the businessto be transacted. No other business shall be considered at such special meeting. A copy of thenotice of a special meeting shall also be posted at the places designated in subsection (b) ofRule 2.

County of San Diego: Board Of Supervisors Rules Of Procedure http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/bos/boardrules.html

1 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

Back to top

Rule 2. Agenda For Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 2

(a) Items for the agenda for any regular meeting of the Board may be included on the agendaonly with the approval of the Chief Administrative Officer; provided, however, Board Membersmay file an item for the agenda for a regular meeting directly with the Clerk.

(b) The Clerk shall prepare and issue an agenda for each regular meeting of the Board. Itemsfiled with the Clerk for the agenda shall be complete. The Clerk shall not accept any additionalmaterial on an agenda item or any new agenda item except those approved by theChairperson and the County Counsel as noted below. All items to be included on the agendafor the regular Tuesday meeting of the Board must be filed in the Office of the Clerk no laterthan 12:00 Noon on the Monday, 8 days before the Tuesday meeting, except for the closedsession agenda which must be filed by County Counsel in the Office of the Clerk no later than8:30 a.m. on the Friday, 4 days before the Tuesday meeting. If Monday is a holiday, Tuesdayopen session items must be filed in the Office of the Clerk no later than 12:00 Noon on theFriday preceding the holiday. If Friday is a holiday, the closed session agenda for the Tuesdaymeeting must be filed in the Office of the Clerk no later than 8:30 a.m. on the last businessday preceding the holiday. All items to be included on the agenda for the Land Use meeting ofthe Board must be filed in the Office of the Clerk no later than 12:00 Noon on the Thursday,13 days prior to the Land Use meeting, except for the closed session agenda which must befiled by County Counsel in the Office of the Clerk no later than 8:30 a.m. on the Friday, 5 daysprior to the Land Use meeting. If Thursday is a holiday, Land Use open session items must befiled in the Office of the Clerk no later than 12:00 Noon on the Wednesday preceding theholiday. If Friday is a holiday, the closed session agenda for the Land Use meeting must befiled in the Office of the Clerk no later than 8:30 a.m. on the last business day preceding theholiday.

After the agenda for any regular meeting of the Board is issued by the Clerk, no additionalitem or additional back-up material will be added to the agenda unless the addition of theitem to the agenda has been approved by the Board at a previous meeting or is submitted byCounty Counsel for closed session; provided, however, that the Chief Administrative Officerand designees, with the consent of the Chairperson, and Board members may place items onthe agenda for open regular meetings where such late items require immediate action at thenext appropriate Board meeting and would have a substantial detrimental effect (such asfinancial) on the County or public, if not acted upon. All late items approved for inclusion onthe agenda must be filed in the Office of the Clerk no later than 8:30 a.m. on the Fridaypreceding the meeting date; or if Friday is a holiday, by 8:30 a.m. on the last business daypreceding the holiday.

Written disclosures required by Section 1000.1 of the San Diego County Charter filed with theClerk of the Board will automatically be processed by the Clerk in accordance with therequirements of the Charter. Supplemental disclosures filed at a meeting of the Board ofSupervisors will be announced by the Clerk of the Board.

The Chief Administrative Officer shall determine the placement of agenda items within subjectmatter designations, and shall identify policy matters with an asterisk to be placed alongsidethe agenda number. The agenda for the Tuesday and Land Use meetings shall be issued andposted by the Clerk no later than the preceding Thursday. The agenda also shall include noticeof items to be heard by the Board in its separate and distinct capacity as:

Air Pollution Control Board of the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District

Board of Directors of the San Diego County Flood Control District

Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of San Diego County

Board of Directors of the County of San Diego Industrial Development Agency

Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the County of San Diego

Boards of Directors of five Sanitation Districts

Each agenda shall be posted at the South Entrance of the First Floor of the San Diego CountyAdministration Center and on the bulletin board located at the North Chamber (Room 310),Third Floor, County Administration Center. Copies of the agenda, agenda back-up material,Board of Supervisors Policies, Board of Supervisors Rules of Procedure, and Statements ofProceedings shall be available in the Office of the Clerk and on the County?s Internet WebSite. The agenda shall be made available to the Chairperson of each Planning Group, SponsorGroup, community newspaper and daily newspaper. The Clerk of the Board is directed to usethe most efficient and cost effective means to make the agenda available. The primary meansof distribution shall be through the County Internet Web Site, followed by electronic mail,followed by facsimile (fax) transmission, and followed by United States Postal Mail Service.Mail subscriptions to the agendas and Statements of Proceedings may be procured through


2 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

the Department of General Services Document Services Unit.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this Rule, if the Board continues anagenda item scheduled for the Tuesday or the Land Use meeting for one or two weeks in orderto receive additional staff reports, the additional staff report must be filed in the Office of theClerk no later than 8:30 a.m. on the Friday preceding the meeting date; or if Friday is aholiday, by 8:30 a.m. on the last business day preceding the meeting date.

(d) As required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, items not on the posted agenda for a meetingshall not be considered by the Board except as follows:

(1) Upon determination by a majority vote of the Board that an emergency situation exists.The determination shall be made prior to Board consideration?of the emergency item. Anemergency situation is limited to:

(a)work stoppage or other activity which severely impairs public health, safety or both.

(b)crippling disaster which severely impairs public health, safety, or both.

(2) Upon determination by a two-thirds vote of the Board Members present, or a unanimousvote if less than two-thirds of the Members are present, that there is a need to take immediateaction and that the need for action came to the attention of local agency subsequent to theagenda being posted. The determination shall be made prior to Board consideration of theitem.

(3) The item was posted for a prior meeting occurring not more than five calendar days priorto the date action is taken on the item and at which prior meeting, the item was continued tothe meeting at which action is being taken.

Whenever an off-docket item is presented by a Board Member or the Chief AdministrativeOfficer, it shall be submitted with a separate cover sheet prepared by the Board Member orChief Administrative Officer and headed "Chairperson's Statement to Public to be Read on theRecord."? This cover sheet shall contain the subject title of the item, a short explanation of thematter and, if any, the recommendation.

(e) Any item on the posted agenda for a regular Tuesday or Land Use meeting which has notbeen considered or acted upon shall be deemed continued to the next regular Tuesday or LandUse meeting. Such item shall be relisted on the agenda pursuant to subsection (a) of this Ruleand all material relating to the item shall be redistributed with the agenda.

(f) A quorum of three members must be present in order for the Board to conduct business,including presentation of Proclamations and special awards. Three votes are required for theadoption of any motion that is in order, except where the law requires or permits otherwise.

(g) In the event a motion fails because of a tie vote, the Board may continue the item forconsideration at a future meeting. If for any reason the Board fails to continue such item, theClerk shall place the item on the agenda for the next regular meeting. The provisions of thissubsection shall not apply to items coming within subsections (h) or (i) of this Rule.

(h) Whenever the Board of Supervisors holds a hearing on a planning and zoning and land usematter subject to Article XXIa of the Administrative Code and thereafter takes no actionbecause a motion on the item failed to carry by the required affirmative vote, the Board mayat that meeting continue the matter for future consideration. If the Board does not do so, anymember of the Board may, within thirty days after the date on which the motion failed tocarry, docket with the Clerk of the Board a request that the Board reconsider the matter. If nosuch request is docketed within said 30-day period, or if the Board after reconsidering thematter again fails to take action because a motion thereon fails to carry by the requiredaffirmative vote, then the following shall occur:

(1) If the matter is an appeal from a decision of a lower decision-making body, the decisionfrom which the appeal was taken shall be deemed sustained.

(2) If the matter is one which by statute or ordinance is under the original jurisdiction of theBoard of Supervisors, so that no lower decision has been made, then the matter shall bedeemed disapproved.

(i) Whenever the Board directs that any item on the agenda be continued to a future date, theClerk shall list such item on the regular agenda of such future date.

(j) The following persons are authorized to place matters on the Regular, Land Use and ClosedSession agendas of meetings of the Board:

(1) Members of the Board of Supervisors;

(2) The Chief Administrative Officer and designees;

(3) The County Counsel with Chairperson's approval for closed sessions only; the Chairperson


3 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

shall coordinate scheduling and notification of Closed Session meetings with all Boardmembers and appropriate County staff.

All other elected officials of the County shall file items (using the prescribed format) for theagenda with the Chief Administrative Officer.

Requests for placement of items on the agenda by other persons or agencies must contain abrief summary of the subject matter of what is proposed to be orally presented to the Board;copies of any supporting documentary material, if appropriate; and the name(s) of theperson(s) who will make the presentation. The request(s) will be referred by the Clerk to theChief Administrative Officer, who shall make a recommendation to the Chairperson. With theconcurrence of the Chairperson, the Chief Administrative Officer may place the request as anitem on the agenda, with the recommendation of the Chief Administrative Officer, on the datedesignated by the Chairperson.

(k) If there is an item on the agenda which is reasonably expected to generate or involveconsiderable public participation, after consultation with and with the approval of theChairperson, the Clerk shall set the item so as to minimize inconvenience to the participatingpublic, such as setting the item at 10:00 a.m. or 2:00 p.m. The Chairperson shall limit thenumber of set matters to no more than two or three per meeting.

Back to top

Rule 3. Order Of Business For Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 7

(a) The schedule of business for the Tuesday meeting shall be:

9:00 a.m. - 12:00 Noon - Agenda Matters

12:00 Noon - 2:00 p.m. - Recess

2:00 p.m. - Until Adjournment into Closed Session Agenda Matters

Closed Session (if necessary) - Closed Session Agenda Matters

Reconvene into Open Session to report Closed Session actions (if necessary)

Whenever the Monday immediately preceding the Tuesday meeting day is a holiday, theTuesday meeting shall begin at 2:00 p.m.

(b) The order of business of the regular meeting held on Tuesday shall be:

- Roll Call

- Invocation

- Pledge of Allegiance

- Presentation of Proclamations

- Public Communication, pursuant to Rule 4 (f)

- Approval of Minutes

- Agenda review at call of the Chairperson to identify those items on agenda which a Memberof the Board or of the public requests the opportunity to discuss.

- Approval at the call of the Chairperson of those items for which there is no request fordiscussion. Approval for such items shall be the recommendation of the Chief AdministrativeOfficer, or, in the event the item has been filed by a Member of the Board, therecommendation of the Member of the Board.

- Discussion of items that the public has requested an opportunity to discuss shall be taken insequential order followed by discussion of all other items to be discussed taken in sequentialorder; provided, however, the Chairperson may take items out of sequential order for thepurpose of accommodating the public or expediting the conduct of the meeting.

- Closed Session and reporting of Closed Session Actions (if necessary).

The Chairperson may alter or deviate from this schedule.

(c) The agenda of Special Districts will generally be considered during the week of the monthindicated below:

Air Pollution Control Board of the SanDiego County Air Pollution Control District

Second Wednesday meeting of month at 9:00a.m. preceding Board of Supervisors discussion


4 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

items.

Redevelopment Agency of the County ofSan Diego First Tuesday meeting of month at 9:00 a.m.

County of San Diego IndustrialDevelopment Agency First Tuesday meeting of month at 9:00 a.m.

Housing Authority of the County of SanDiego First Wednesday meeting of month at 9:00 a.m.

preceding Board of Supervisors discussion items.

San Diego County Flood Control District Second Wednesday meeting of month at 9:00a.m.

Sanitation Districts Second Wednesday meeting of month at 9:00 a.m.

Reports/Issue Updates from other County elected officials, Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk,Treasurer-Tax Collector, Sheriff and District Attorney, will be scheduled by the Chairperson, asappropriate.

Whenever the Monday immediately preceding the Tuesday meeting day is a holiday, theTuesday meeting shall begin at 2:00 p.m.

Except as otherwise indicated in this subdivision, in the event any item on the agenda of oneof the above listed agencies is to be discussed, the Chairperson shall announce the time theitem will be discussed.

With usual notice to the public by posting and making copies available, agendas for SpecialDistricts may be considered on other Tuesdays or Wednesdays if there are urgent items oritems related to an other agenda to be considered by the Board in its other governing bodycapacities.

(d) The schedule of business for the Land Use agenda meeting shall be:

9:00 a.m. - 12:00 Noon Land Use Matters

12:00 Noon - 2:00 p.m. Recess

2:00 p.m. - Until Adjournment into Closed Session Land Use Matters

Closed Session (if necessary) Closed Session Agenda Matters

Reconvene into Open Session to report Closed Session actions (if necessary)

(e) The order of business of the regular Land Use meeting shall be:

- Roll Call

- Public Communication, pursuant to Rule 4(f)

- Approval of Minutes

- Agenda review at the call of Chairperson to identify those items on the agenda on which amember of the Board or of the public requests the opportunity to discuss.

- At the call of the Chairperson of those items for which there is no request for discussion,approval shall be in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief Administrative Officer,


5 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

Planning Commission, or Planning and Environmental Review Board. In the event the item hasbeen filed by a Member of the Board, approval shall be in accordance with therecommendations of the Member of the Board.

- Discussion of items shall be taken in sequential order; provided, however, the Chairpersonmay take items out of sequential order for the purpose of accommodating the public orexpediting the conduct of the meeting.

- Closed Session and reporting of Closed Session actions (if necessary).

The Chairperson may alter or deviate from this schedule.

(f) The Chairperson shall coordinate scheduling and notification for meetings with BoardMembers and appropriate County staff.

Back to top

Rule 4. Public Participation In Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 10

(a) The policy of the Board is to permit public participation in Board meetings No person shalladdress the Board without the permission of the Chairperson The Chairperson may limit thetime for presentation and the number of persons who may address the Board on any agendaitem The general policy of the Board regarding public participation is as follows: three minutesper person; the Chairperson may set a limit for organized group presentations of three or morepersons up to 15 minutes, and may set limits for each side when many persons request tospeak on an agenda item The Chairperson of a Planning or Sponsor Group is the sole officialspokesperson for the group unless this responsibility is delegated in writing or otherwiseestablished by majority vote of the group and communicated in writing to the Chairperson ofthe Board of Supervisors Five minutes may be allowed for such presentation unless there arecircumstances warranting additional time If there is a minority report from the Planning orSponsor Group, the Chairperson may allocate up to five minutes for such presentation TheChairperson shall have discretion in setting time limits.

(b) Any person wishing to make a presentation to the Board on an agenda item must file withthe Clerk a written Request to Speak form prior to the scheduled opening time of the meetingor prior to the time that the item is called for discussion if the item has not been adoptedwithout discussion No person may yield speaking time to another person. Any person whodoes not wish to speak to the Board but wishes to have the record reflect a position in favor orin opposition to an agenda item may do so by indicating the same on the Request to Speakform If an agenda item is set for a specific time, a written Request to Speak form must befiled at least five minutes prior to that specified time

(c) In the event that any meeting of the Board is willfully interrupted or disrupted by a personor by a group or groups of persons so as to render the orderly conduct of the meetingunfeasible, the Chairperson may recess the meeting or order the person, group or groups ofpersons willfully interrupting the meeting to leave the meeting or be removed from themeeting.

(d) Placards, banners, signs, flags, or other large objects designed to interrupt or disrupt theorderly conduct of the meeting are not permitted in the Chambers.

(e) In the event that any meeting is willfully interrupted or disrupted by a person or by agroup or groups of persons so as to render the orderly conduct of such meeting unfeasible andorder cannot be restored by the removal of the person or persons willfully interrupting ordisrupting the meeting, the Chairperson may recess the meeting or order the meeting roomcleared and continue in session Only matters appearing on the posted agenda may beconsidered in such a session Duly accredited representatives of the press or other news media,except those participating in the disturbance, shall be allowed to attend or remain in themeeting.

(f) At each regular meeting there will be a total of ten (10) minutes scheduled at thebeginning of the meeting for members of the public to address the Board, each speaker to beallowed no more than two minutes, on any subject matter within the jurisdiction of the Boardand which is not an item on the agenda for that meeting or litigation which is pending againstthe County of San Diego or its officers or employees Each speaker must file with the Clerk awritten Public Communication Request to Speak form at least 10 minutes prior to thescheduled opening time of the meeting In the event that more than five (5) individualsrequest to address the Board, the first five (5) will be heard at the beginning of the meetingThe remaining speakers will be heard at the conclusion of the meeting and granted two (2)minutes each Any person filing a Public Communication Request to Speak form after the timedeadline established by this subsection shall not be allowed to make a presentation to theBoard All issues raised by a speaker will be automatically referred to the Chief AdministrativeOfficer No other action may be taken by the Board at this time Members of the public shall notbe permitted to address the Board during the public communication period specified above for


6 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

the purpose of urging Board reconsideration of any Board action which has been taken in thepreceding one-year period; provided, however, that members of the public may request tohave their reconsideration recommendations placed on a Board agenda in accordance with theprocedures set forth in the last paragraph of subdivision (j) of Rule 2.

Back to top

Rule 5. Nomination And Selection Of Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, AndChairperson Pro Tem Of The Board Of Supervisors And State Of The CountyAddress - Page 12

(a) The officers of the Board are the Chairperson, the Vice Chairperson and the ChairpersonPro Tem. The nominations for and selection of Chairperson, Vice Chairperson and ChairpersonPro Tem for the ensuing year shall be accomplished by the Board within 30 days of the firstregularly scheduled meeting in January. No nominations or selections shall be accomplisheduntil after any newly elected Supervisors have taken office.

(b) The method of nomination and selection of Chairperson, Vice Chairperson and ChairpersonPro Tem will be at the discretion of the Board.

(c) The Chairperson, Vice Chairperson and Chairperson Pro Tem shall be selected for a periodof one year, or until such time as a successor has been selected by the Board pursuant tothese Rules. In the event of a vacancy, the Board shall fill the vacancy within 30 days from thedate of such vacancy.

(d) During the absence of the Chairperson, the Vice Chairperson shall preside. In the eventthat both the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson are absent, the Chairperson Pro Tem willpreside.

(e) In the event that the office of Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, or Chairperson Pro Tembecomes vacant, the Board, within 30 days from the date of such vacancy, will select one ofits Members to fill that office.

(f) The State of the County Address by the Chairperson shall be scheduled for a date, time,and place at the discretion of the Chairperson giving the address.

Back to top

Rule 6. Motions During Meetings Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 12

(a) Action of the Board shall be taken by motion. Any action of the Board may be proposed bythe motion of any Member. Such a motion, if seconded by any Member, shall be on the floorand must be considered. If a motion is not seconded, the motion fails for lack of a second, andshall be so declared by the Chairperson.

(b) A motion may be withdrawn by its maker at any time before adoption or rejection, withthe consent of the second. Absent the consent of the second, the motion shall remain on thefloor. The second to a motion may be withdrawn by the second at any time before adoption orrejection of the motion. Upon withdrawal of the second, the motion will be lost for lack of asecond and so declared by the Chairperson unless seconded by another Member.

(c) The Chairperson shall recognize Members of the Board who desire to obtain the floor tospeak in the order that their district number appears on the electronic Board Member requestto speak system. Once the Chairperson has recognized the right of a Member to speak, theChairperson shall protect the speaker from disturbance or interference. The Chairperson, whenthe interest of the Board requires, may permit a Member to be interrupted.

(d) When a question or "original motion" is under debate, no motion shall be received unless:

1. To adjourn

2. To lay on the table

3. To consider the previous question

4. To postpone to a certain date

5. To commit to committee

6. To amend

7. To postpone indefinitely

These motions shall have preference in the above order.


7 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

(e) A motion on the floor may be amended by motion at any time before adoption or rejection.If the motion to amend fails, the original motion will be voted upon. If the motion to amendpasses, the amendment is adopted and, thereafter, the original motion, as amended, will bevoted upon.

(f) After a motion has been seconded, any Member may discuss the subject of the motion.When no Member wishes to discuss the motion further, the Chairperson shall call for a vote onthe motion. At any time after a motion has been seconded, any Member who has the floor maycall for the question. The Chairperson may call for the vote if it appears that further discussionwill be repetitious or that a majority of the Members present concur in the call.

(g) At any time after a motion has been seconded, any Member may move to table themotion. If the motion to table is seconded, the Chairperson shall forthwith call for a vote onsuch motion. A motion to table shall include all amendments to the original motion. A motionto table an item is not debatable and no further discussion or debate shall be permitted oneither the original motion or the motion to table. If the motion to table does not pass,consideration of the original motion will continue. If the motion to table does pass, the originalmotion will remain on the floor but may not again be considered at that meeting unless amotion to remove the original motion from the table is passed. The original motion may thenbe considered and voted upon at the next regular meeting of the Board unless again tabled. Ifnot considered at such meeting, it will be deemed lost. For the purposes of this subsection, anadjourned meeting shall be considered a separate meeting.

(h) A motion to adjourn or a motion to fix time of adjournment shall be decided with debate.

(i) A motion to consider the previous question shall preclude all amendment from debate tothe main question and shall be put in the form "shall the main question be put to a vote."

(j) A Member called to order shall relinquish the floor unless permitted to explain, and theBoard, if appealed to, shall decide on the case, but without debate. If there is no appeal, thedecision of the Chairperson shall be final.

(k) A motion to reconsider the vote on an agenda item may be made at the meeting at whichthe item was acted upon, or any adjourned session of the same meeting. The motion may bemade only by a Member who voted on the prevailing side of the agenda item sought to bereconsidered. No question can be twice reconsidered unless it was amended after its firstreconsideration. The provisions of this subsection shall apply also to any motion/request toreconsider an item previously acted upon by the Board whereby law a motion/request toreconsider may be brought at a meeting or time other than the meeting, or adjourned sessionthereof, where the agenda item sought to be reconsidered was acted upon.

(l) A motion to commit to committee shall specify the purpose of the committee, the length oftime the committee shall serve, and the times and methods by which the committee shallreport to the Board.

Back to top

Rule 7. Retention Of Exhibits And Documentary Material Received In HearingsBefore The Board Of Supervisors - Page 15

(a) Hearings required by law - In hearings required by law (such as hearings on Planning andZoning matters on applications for variances, special use permits, reclassification of zones,and amendments to General Plan for which a hearing is required by statute or ordinance) thefollowing rules shall apply:

(1) Subject to the conditions stated below, in (3) and (4) of this subsection, all exhibits,including documentary materials such as photographs, drawings, maps, plats, letters,petitions and other physical evidence received by the Board at hearings shall be retained bythe Clerk as part of the record of the hearings. To the extent possible, the Clerk may furnishcopies of such material to persons requesting them upon payment of the fee prescribed by theSan Diego County Administrative Code for copies of public records.

(2) All exhibits received by the Board will be marked for purposes of identification. Exhibitsfiled with the Board by County staff personnel will be marked by numbers in the orderreceived: numbers 1, 2, 3, etc. Exhibits filed with the Board by persons other than Countystaff personnel will be marked by letters in the order received: A, B, C, etc. References toexhibits filed with the Board will be by the numbered or lettered designations assigned tothem.

(3) Exhibits filed with the Board may be released by the Clerk under the following conditions:

(a) At the conclusion of a hearing where the Board has authorized the release of exhibits tothe parties who submitted them.


8 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

(b) At the conclusion of a hearing or during a continuance of a hearing, if for good cause theBoard has authorized a person other than the Clerk to retain custody of the exhibits, suchperson shall assume responsibility for custody and preservation of the exhibits and shall keepand maintain the exhibits for further proceedings or until otherwise directed by the Board.

(4) The Clerk will not be required to retain permanent exhibits, such as aerial photographs,used by County departments in the conduct of their regular activities. Such exhibits will beidentified for the record and their specific use and purpose noted in the record by the Clerk.

(b) Hearings not required by law - In consideration of matters where hearings are not requiredor specifically provided for by law, such as discussion of routine Board agenda items, and inBoard conferences, the following rules shall apply:

(1) Documentary materials such as photographs, drawings, maps, plats, letters, petitions andother documentary or physical materials received by the Board from any person may bereturned by the Clerk to such person at the conclusion of the hearing unless (i) an objection israised by an interested person and the Board determines that the return of such evidencewould prejudice the rights of the objector, or (ii) the Clerk determines that the retention ofsuch materials is necessary for the preservation of the record of the meeting. To the extentpossible, the Clerk may furnish copies of materials retained by the Clerk to persons requestingthem upon payment of the fee prescribed by the San Diego County Administrative Code forcopies of public records.

Back to top

Rule 8. Conferences Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 16

(a) Conferences of the Board may be scheduled by the Chairperson to be held at any regularor special meeting. The agenda for any conference shall be approved by the Chairperson.

(b) Conferences shall be for the purpose of providing the Board information submitted byCounty staff or by those of the public invited by the Board or County staff to address theBoard at such conference.

Back to top

Rule 9. Overruling The Chairperson Of The Board Of Supervisors - Page 17

A decision of the Chairperson with respect to the interpretation, applicability or enforcement ofthese Rules may be overruled by a majority vote of the Members present.

Back to top

Rule 10. Ceremonial Functions And Proclamations - Page 17

The Chairperson is authorized to represent the County at ceremonial functions, proclamationceremonies, and other similar events when the Board has not otherwise designated one of itsMembers to represent the County. The Chairperson shall coordinate the representation of theCounty by other Members at such events.

Back to top

Rule 11. Suspension Of Rules Of Procedure - Page 17

Any rule of the Board may be suspended temporarily, upon approval of the majority of theBoard. The temporary suspension shall apply only to the matter under immediateconsideration and, in no case, shall it extend beyond an adjournment.

Back to top

Rule 12. Amendment Of Rules Of Procedure - Page 17

No rule of the Board shall be adopted or amended except by resolution adopted by the Board.

Back to top

Rule 13. Policies To Implement Rules Of Procedure - Page 17


9 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

The Board may adopt policies to implement provisions of these Rules.

Back to top

Rule 14. Parliamentary Procedure - Page 17

These Rules shall govern the proceedings of the Board. In all situations not covered by theseRules or any provision of law, the authority shall be Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised.The Clerk of the Board shall serve as Parliamentarian.

Rules of Procedure adopted by the Board of Supervisors October 27, 1970, No. 69.

Amended (Section 1) December 19, 1970, No. 84.

Amended (Section 10) October 26, 1971, No. 62.

Amended (Section 1) August 21, 1973, No. 70, effective September 20, 1973.

Amended by adopting Robert's Rules of Order, Revised, as supplement to Rules of Procedure,March 22, 1974, No. 11.

Amended (Sections 2, 10 and 11 and added Section 14) March 18, 1975, No. 3.

Amended (Added, deleted and/or reorganized or renumbered complete Rules ofProcedure)April 29, 1975, No. 72.

Amended (Section 2) July 15, 1975, No. 57, effective July 30, 1975.

Amended (Added Section 10.5) August 26, 1975, No. 7.

Amended (Section 2) September 2, 1975, No. 5.

Amended (Section 7 and eliminated Section 6) October 1, 1975, No. 15.


Amended (Section 1) November 4, 1975, No. 95.

Amended (Section 15) January 20, 1976, No. 52.

Amended (Section 15) February 10, 1976, No. 73.

Amended (Section 13) June 15, 1976, No. 18, effective November 25, 1976.


Amended (Section 2) October 19, 1976, No. 59, effective November 25, 1976.Repealed(Section 17) December 7, 1976, No. 10, effective January 7, 1977.

Added (Section 17) February 1, 1977, No. 26.

Amended (Sections 1, 2 and 12) May 3, 1977, No. 39.

Amended (Section 15) September 27, 1977, No. 45.

Amended (Sections 2 and 20) January 31, 1978, No. 59.

Amended (Section 15) March 21, 1978, No. 164.

Amended (Sections 2 and 17) April 25, 1978, No. 8.

Amended (Section 13) August 8, 1978, No. 3.

Amended (Sections 1, 2, 12 and 17) March 6, 1979, No. 6.

Amended (Sections 2 and 12) May 15, 1979, No. 10.

Amended (Section 15) August 21, 1979, No. 45.

Amended (Section 2) November 13, 1979, No. 14, effective January 7, 1980.

Amended (Section 15) March 11, 1980, No. 9.

Amended (Section 15) July 15, 1980, No. 10.

Amended (Section 2) March 15, 1983, No. 5, effective April 21, 1983.


10 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM

Amended (Section 1) July 3, 1984, No. 10.

Amended (Section 2) January 28, 1986, No. 88.

Amended (Added, deleted, reorganized, and renumbered complete Rules of Procedure) April22, 1986, No. 3.

Amended (Section 5(f)) September 17, 1986, effective October 24, 1986.

Amended (various rules) April 7, 1987, No. 25.

Amended (various rules) March 8, 1988, No. 7A.

Amended (Added, deleted, reorganized, and renumbered complete Rules of Procedure) March14, 1989, No. 40.

Amended (Rules 1 and 2) July 18, 1989, No. 73.

Amended (various rules) April 24, 1990, No. 20.

Amended (various rules) January 9, 1991, No. 22.

Amended (Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4) February 4, 1992, No. 30.

Amended (Rule 2 (h), deleted (i), renumbered (j), (k) and (l)), July 1, 1992, No. 7, effectiveJuly 31, 1992.

Amended (Rules 1, (c), 3 (a), (c) and 4 (a)), March 2, 1993, No. 26, effective March 2, 1993.

Amended (Rules 1 (c), 2 (b), 2 (d), 2 (j), 3 (a), (b), (d), and (e), 4 (h)), April 19, 1994, No.38, effective April 19, 1994.

Amended (Rules 2 (b), 2 (j), 2 (k), 3 (b), 3 (c), 3 (e), added 3 (f); 4 (a); deleted 4 (c),renumbered; and amended 4 (f) added 6 (d), (h), (i), (j), and (l) and renumbered; deleted 8(c) and (d); amended 11 and 14)), effective January 4, 1995 (2).

Amended (Rule 3 (c)), effective January 3, 1996 (2).

Amended (Rules 1 (a), 1 (b), 3 (a), 3 (b), 3 (d), 4 (f)), effective January 7, 1997 (1).

Amended (Rules 1 (a), 1 (b) 2 (d), 3 (a), 3 (b), 3 (d)), effective January 6, 1998 (3).

Amended (Rules 2 (b), 3 (c), effective September 22, 1999 (7)

Amended (Rules 2 (b), effective January, 23, 2001 (26)

Back to top

County Departments | Accessibility Policy | Web & Privacy Policies | Help | Visiting San Diego


11 of 11 6/26/2012 6:52 AM


Exhibit “B”

6/26/12 1

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING

TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2012, 9 A.M. Board of Supervisors North Chamber

1600 Pacific Highway, Room 310, San Diego, California

Order of Business

A. Roll Call

B. Invocation

C. Pledge of Allegiance

D. Presentation or Announcement of Proclamations and Awards

E. Approval of Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for Budget Hearings for the Board of Supervisors, Air Pollution Control Board, Flood Control District, In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority, Redevelopment Successor Agency, and the Sanitation District from June 11 - 20, 2012.

F. Public Communication Speakers

G. Formation of Consent Calendar

H. Discussion Items

I. Time Certain:

Time Item Subject 2:00 P.M. 23. BUDGET DELIBERATIONS: CHIEF

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER PROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14

TIME CERTAIN: 2:00 P.M. (Note: Public Hearings on the Operational Plan took place beginning June 11, 2012 and closed at 5 p.m. on June 20, 2012. There will be no public testimony for this item at 2 p.m.)

NOTICE: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY TAKE ANY ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THE ITEMS INCLUDED ON THIS AGENDA. RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY COUNTY STAFF DO NOT LIMIT ACTIONS THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY TAKE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC SHOULD NOT RELY UPON THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE BOARD LETTER AS DETERMINATIVE OF THE ACTION THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY TAKE ON A PARTICULAR MATTER.

REVISION 1

Category Agenda No. Subject

6/26/12 2

Public Safety 1. SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF CRIME ANALYSIS SOFTWARE SOLUTION [FUNDING SOURCE(S): SHERIFF'S ASSET FORFEITURE FUNDS]

2. SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF MEDICAL SERVICES FOR INMATES [FUNDING SOURCE(S): GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUE AND LOCAL COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ACCOUNT]

3. OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES – ACCEPTANCE OF HOME DEPOT FOUNDATION DONATIONS

4. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT 2011 – ADOPT AN ORDINANCE FOR THE HOME DETENTION PROGRAM

5. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF DIVISION 1, TITLE 3 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO EMERGENCY SERVICES AND RESOLUTION UPDATING THE COUNTY’S DESIGNATIONS OF AUTHORIZED AGENTS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES FUNDING

Health and Human Services

*6. 2011-2012 “LET’S MOVE! COUNTY” REPORT

7. GRANDPARENTS RAISING GRANDCHILDREN STATUS REPORT

8. REVIEW AND COMMENT ON THE REVISED FIRST 5 COMMISSION STRATEGIC PLAN

9. AGING & INDEPENDENCE SERVICES AREA PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-2016

*Presentation


6/26/12 3

10. FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 TUBERCULOSIS CONTROL REVENUES AND SERVICES [FUNDING SOURCE(S): CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH]

11. MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES – COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION FOR THERAPEUTIC BEHAVIORAL SERVICES [FUNDING SOURCE(S): MEDI-CAL FEDERAL FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION (FFP), MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT (MHSA), AND MENTAL HEALTH REALIGNMENT]

12. BOARD POLICY SUPPORTING SAN PASQUAL ACADEMY

13. CONTINUATION OF THE DEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING AND ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (DSEP) FOR YOUNG CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE [FUNDING SOURCE(S): FIRST 5 COMMISSION OF SAN DIEGO]

14. SENIOR SERVICES REVENUE AGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 [FUNDING SOURCE(S): STATE GENERAL FUND, TITLES III, V, AND VII OF THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT, FEDERAL AND STATE HICAP FUNDS, TITLE XIX MEDICAID, VETERANS ADMINISTRATION SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION, NATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, TITLE II CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC]

15. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS FROM KIWANIS CLUB OF ALPINE FOUNDATION


6/26/12 4

Community Services 16. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY - FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT FOR AGING AND INDEPENDENCE SERVICES, 1305 UNION PLAZA COURT, OCEANSIDE [FUNDING SOURCE(S): SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE REVENUE]

17. SET HEARING FOR 8/7/12: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY – 4.14 ACRES, SHERIDAN ROAD, CAMPO, COUNTY PARCEL NO. 2012-0045-A; ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 656-040-62 (6/26/12 - SURPLUS DECLARATION/RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO SELL; 8/7/12 - BID OPENING) (4 VOTES)

18. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - APPROVE NEW LEASE AT 5252/54/58 KEARNY VILLA WAY, SAN DIEGO [FUNDING SOURCE(S): DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROAD FUND] (4 VOTES)

Financial and General Government

*19. GREEN PROGRAMS ON MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON

20. NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT GRANTS & AMENDMENTS (DISTRICT: 5) [FUNDING SOURCE(S): NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT BUDGET]

21. NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE VILLAGE GROVE APARTMENTS IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $18,000,000

22. NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $13,500,000

*Presentation


6/26/12 5

23. BUDGET DELIBERATIONS: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER PROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14

TIME CERTAIN: 2:00 P.M. (Note: Public Hearings on the Operational Plan took place beginning June 11, 2012 and closed at 5 p.m. on June 20, 2012. There will be no public testimony for this item at 2 p.m.)

24. AMENDMENTS TO THE CIVIL SERVICE RULES

25. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE

Communications Received

26. COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED

Appointments 27. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: APPOINTMENTS

Financial and General Government

28. NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT PROGRAM AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: 1) (4 VOTES)

29. ALLOCATION AND AMENDMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT FUNDS (DISTRICT: 4) (4 VOTES)

Closed Session 30. CLOSED SESSION

NOTICE: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY TAKE ANY ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THE ITEMS INCLUDED ON THIS AGENDA. RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY COUNTY STAFF DO NOT LIMIT ACTIONS THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY TAKE. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC SHOULD NOT RELY UPON THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE BOARD LETTER AS DETERMINATIVE OF THE ACTION THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MAY TAKE ON A PARTICULAR MATTER. Supporting documentation and attachments for items listed on this agenda can be viewed online at www.sdcounty.ca.gov/cob/bosa/ or in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at the County Administration Center, 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 402, San Diego, CA 92101.

http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/cob/bosa/

6/26/12 1

1. SUBJECT: SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF CRIME ANALYSIS SOFTWARE SOLUTION (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: The Sheriff's Department is implementing a new model and management philosophy

called Intelligence Led Policing (ILP). A key component of ILP is to enhance the intelligence gathering and analysis capability, which will provide the Department's operational decision makers with near real-time information for more efficient law enforcement. The CrimeView Dashboard and Desktop ("CrimeView") is a proprietary software solution that will integrate with existing data management systems to create an easy-to-use electronic briefing book format, which includes crime intelligence, analysis and mapping. Additionally, CrimeView can instantaneously and efficiently update the information for use in law enforcement activities, such as calls for information regarding crime incidents, services, registered sex offenders, probationers, parolees and warrants. The Sheriff's Department believes CrimeView is an important tool in making ILP successful in San Diego County. This request is for the approval of a sole source procurement of CrimeView from the Omega Group. The software solution includes the integration of CrimeView with existing data management systems, software licenses, training of Sheriff staff, maintenance and support for up to one year through June 30, 2013, plus two one-year options for maintenance and support from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015, and an additional six months if needed.

FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2012-13 Chief Administrative

Office Proposed Operational Plan in the Sheriff’s Department. The funding source is the Sheriff's Asset Forfeiture Funds. If approved, this request will result in an estimated Fiscal Year 2012-13 costs and revenue of $200,764. There will be no change in net General Fund costs and no additional staff years.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: N/A

RECOMMENDATION: SHERIFF

In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to enter into negotiations with the Omega Group; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract for the CrimeView software solution for up to one year, plus two one-year options through June 30, 2015, and an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to the approval of the Sheriff. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87.

6/26/12 2

2. SUBJECT: SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF MEDICAL SERVICES FOR INMATES (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: The Sheriff's Department provides comprehensive healthcare services to inmates in

custody at its seven detention facilities throughout San Diego County, as required by Title 15 of the California Code of Regulations. The Sheriff staffs and maintains medical infirmaries in the San Diego Central Jail, Las Colinas, George Bailey (which includes East Mesa and Facility 8), South Bay, and Vista detention facilities. Under a contract expiring June 30, 2012, the University of California, San Diego Medical Center (UCSD-MC) provides as-needed specialized expertise and services for the Sheriff's detention facilities. The Vista Detention Facility contracts with another provider for its on-site specialty medical services. UCSD-MC provides comprehensive emergency and non-emergency inpatient and outpatient care onsite at detention facilities and at UCSD-MC. Services include primary care, specialty care, sick call, dialysis, surgery, hospital, and case management.

This is a request to grant an exemption from competitive procurement pursuant to Board Policy A-87 (2 C) and to extend the current contract with UCSD-MC for one year with four option years.

FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 CAO Proposed

Operational Plan for the Sheriff's Department. If approved, this request will result in an estimated annual cost of $13,500,000 in Fiscal Year 2012-13 and $14,175,000 in Fiscal Year 2013-14. The funding sources are General Purpose Revenue and $700,000 from the Local Community Corrections Account. If approved, there will be no change in net General fund cost and no additional staff years.


RECOMMENDATION: SHERIFF

In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting Department to enter into negotiations with UCSD-MC; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, extend its current contract for medical services at the Sheriff’s detention facilities for one year and up to four option years from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2017, and an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect non-material changes to services and funding, subject to approval of the Sheriff.

6/26/12 3

3. SUBJECT: OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES – ACCEPTANCE OF HOME DEPOT FOUNDATION DONATIONS (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: Administrative Code Section 66 and Board of Supervisors’ Policy A-112, Acceptance

of Gifts and Donations, permits the acceptance of gifts by the administrative head of each department in the County, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors. This request is to approve the acceptance of Home Depot gift cards valued at $10,000 from the Home Depot Foundation through CaliforniaVolunteers to be used for the purchase of disaster-related supplies in direct support of the Office of Emergency Services’ (OES) California Disaster Corps Program.

FISCAL IMPACT: There are no anticipated costs associated with acceptance of this donation. Funds for

this request are not included in the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Operational Plan for OES. If approved, this request will accept gift card donations valued at $10,000 from the Home Depot Foundation to OES. There will be no change in net General Fund costs and no additional staff years. These donations are much appreciated and will be used to support OES’ California Disaster Corps Program in accordance with the wishes of the donors.


RECOMMENDATION: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

1. In accordance with Administrative Code Section 66 and Board Policy A-112, approve the acceptance of a donation of gift cards valued at $10,000 from the Home Depot Foundation through CaliforniaVolunteers to the Office of Emergency Services to be used for the purchase of disaster-related supplies in direct support of the California Disaster Corps Program.

2. Authorize the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign a letter of appreciation on

behalf of the Board of Supervisors and the County of San Diego to the Home Depot Foundation.

4. SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT 2011 – ADOPT AN ORDINANCE FOR THE HOME DETENTION PROGRAM (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: On June 19, 2012 (1), your Board heard a presentation on Public Safety Realignment

2011 program implementation and approved the Sheriff Department’s Rules and

6/26/12 4

Regulations for the Home Detention Program. Also on June 19, 2012, your Board adopted an urgency ordinance to authorize certain fees related to the Home Detention Program and introduced an ordinance to amend the San Diego County Administrative Code to authorize certain fees related to the Home Detention Program.

Today’s action will adopt an ordinance to authorize certain fees related to the Home Detention Program.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the adoption of this ordinance. There

will no change in net General Fund costs and no additional staff years.



Adopt the Ordinance entitled:

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 953 OF ARTICLE LXIII OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, RELATING TO PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT OF 2011.

5. SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF DIVISION 1, TITLE 3 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO EMERGENCY SERVICES AND RESOLUTION UPDATING THE COUNTY’S DESIGNATIONS OF AUTHORIZED AGENTS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES FUNDING (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: On June 19, 2012 (2), the Board of Supervisors introduced the Ordinance for further

consideration and adoption on June 26, 2012. The actions recommended below update the County’s designations of emergency planning, response and funding personnel as required by state and federal law. First, the California Emergency Services Act (“Act”) provides for the coordination and provision of emergency services at the state and local level. Under the Act, the Board of Supervisors may establish emergency services organizations and response protocols. Because emergencies can arise at any time, the Act authorizes the proclamation of emergencies by local officials as may be designated by ordinance. The first of the actions recommended below would amend the County’s Emergency Services Organization ordinance to clarify the designation and appointment of, and

6/26/12 5

line of succession for the County Director of Emergency Services and make other technical amendments. Second, the County of San Diego receives Federal Emergency Management Assistance funds annually for required planning and operations, and may receive funds for disaster response and recovery under Public Law 93-288, as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Act of 1988. Funds may also be received under the California Natural Disaster Assistance Act for disaster response and recovery. The State, which disburses the federal funds, requires applications for disaster financial assistance to be signed by authorized agents. The second of the actions recommended below would update the County’s designation of its authorized agents for these purposes.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the recommendations.



Adopt the Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 “EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATION” OF DIVISION 1, TITLE 3, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES.

6. SUBJECT: 2011-2012 “LET’S MOVE! COUNTY” REPORT (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: Over the past three decades, childhood obesity rates in America have tripled with

nearly one in three children in our nation being overweight or obese. In response to this crisis, First Lady Michelle Obama launched a national campaign called Let’s Move! The First Lady called on elected officials across the country to join the effort which challenges municipal leaders to solve the problem of childhood obesity within a generation. The campaign emphasizes both the unique ability of communities to solve the challenge locally, and the critical leadership elected officials can provide to bring communities together and spur action.

The County of San Diego is guided by a vision of a healthy, safe and thriving community and is already a national leader in the fight against childhood obesity. Building on the success of the San Diego County Childhood Obesity Initiative, the County of San Diego Nutrition Security Plan and the Health Strategy Agenda: Building Better Health, our Board took action on November 9, 2010 (29) to support the coordination necessary for the County of San Diego to become the first designated Let’s Move! County.

6/26/12 6

Today, our Board will receive a report on the progress made during the first year of being a Let’s Move! County.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this recommendation.


RECOMMENDATION: CHAIRMAN ROBERTS AND SUPERVISOR SLATER-PRICE

Receive the 2011-2012 “Let’s Move! County” Report.

7. SUBJECT: GRANDPARENTS RAISING GRANDCHILDREN STATUS

REPORT (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: On October 25, 2011, Supervisor Greg Cox brought forward a board letter directing

the Chief Administrative Officer to obtain community input to identify needs, resources and solutions for grandparents raising grandchildren and to report back to the Board in 180 days with recommendations for actions to support grandparents responsible for raising their grandchildren. The Board of Supervisors unanimously supported this agenda item.

In the San Diego region, about 66,000 grandparents are living with their grandchildren and approximately 21,000 are primarily responsible for the welfare of their grandchildren. Many of these older adults are challenged by navigating the complex maze of health, education and social services programs, and the resources to assist them are fragmented and hard to access.

Building upon the leadership of Supervisor Greg Cox, a group of community members led by the Director of Aging & Independence Services, Health and Human Services Agency, joined together to identify needed resources and supports for this population. Their combined efforts resulted in the first ever “Grandparents Raising Grandchildren” symposium held at five locations throughout the county on April 21, 2012 and in the creation of the “Handbook for Grandparents and Other Relatives Raising Children.” In support of the County’s adopted Live Well, San Diego! initiative, today’s item provides information about the symposium and other actions taken to date.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.


6/26/12 7


Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to continue support for the “Grandparents Raising Grandchildren” initiative and community workgroup and provide ongoing updates to the Board of Supervisors.

8. SUBJECT: REVIEW AND COMMENT ON THE REVISED FIRST 5

COMMISSION STRATEGIC PLAN (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: The California Children and Families Act (Proposition 10) was passed by voters in

November 1998. The First 5 Commission of San Diego (Commission) uses revenue from voter-approved taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products to promote early childhood development for children 0 through 5.

In accordance with the requirements of the San Diego County Code of Administrative Ordinances, Article IIIp, First 5 Commission of San Diego, the Board of Supervisors is required to review and comment on the Strategic Plan of the Commission and any subsequent revisions.

In a public hearing on April 2, 2012 the Commission reviewed and adopted changes to the Strategic Plan for the period 2010 – 2015. In accordance with the ordinance establishing the Commission, the revised Strategic Plan is submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and comment.

This item supports the Live Well, San Diego! initiative by seeking to improve early childhood health in the San Diego region as well as the Commission’s long-term goal to ensure that “all children in San Diego County enter school ready to learn.”

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.



Review and comment on the revised First 5 Commission Strategic Plan for the period 2010 – 2015.

6/26/12 8

9. SUBJECT: AGING & INDEPENDENCE SERVICES AREA PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-2016 (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: The Health and Human Services Agency’s Aging & Independence Services (AIS)

division administers a wide variety of services for seniors and people with disabilities. The State of California requires the County of San Diego to submit a four-year Area Plan to the California Department of Aging (CDA) to receive Older Americans Act funds that support these programs and services. The current Area Plan 2009-2012 was approved by the Board on May 12, 2009 (5) and submitted to the State. This item requests Board approval and authorization to submit the Area Plan 2012-2016 to CDA and to authorize the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency or designee to sign subsequent Area Plan documents. This action supports the County’s adopted Live Well, San Diego! Initiative by ensuring that the County will continue to receive federal and State funding to administer needed programs and services for seniors and persons with disabilities.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with today’s action to submit the Area Plan

to the California Department of Aging. A separate board letter to approve the Revenue Agreement in the amount of $9,991,902 related to this Area Plan is on today’s agenda.



1. Approve the Aging & Independence Services Planning and Service Area Plan 2012-2016 and authorize the Chairman of the Board to sign the required documents to submit the plan to the California Department of Aging.

2. Authorize the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency or designee to sign and submit subsequent Area Plan documents as required by the California Department of Aging during the four-year plan period.

10. SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 TUBERCULOSIS CONTROL REVENUES AND SERVICES (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: The County of San Diego provides for the prevention and control of tuberculosis

through a combination of federal and State funding methods. Pursuant to authority provided by this Board on March 16, 1999 (3) authorizing the Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) Director to seek additional external funding to build capacity and enhance programs for early detection of threats to public health, HHSA

6/26/12 9

has been awarded grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the State of California Department of Public Health for countywide tuberculosis treatment and control services. Today’s action requests Board approval to accept revenues of $3,794,445 awarded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the State of California Department of Public Health for Fiscal Year 2012-13. Today’s action also requests continued authority to seek and apply for grant opportunities to build further capacity for early detection of threats. Tuberculosis treatment and control services help reduce the spread of disease in the San Diego region, which supports the County’s adopted Live Well, San Diego! initiative which promotes healthy, safe and thriving communities.


Operational Plan in the Health and Human Services Agency. If approved, this proposal will result in costs of $4,745,494 and revenues of $3,794,445. The funding sources are the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ($1,942,555) and State of California Department of Public Health ($1,851,890). Since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and State of California Department of Health Services revenues do not fully offset indirect costs and the public health benefits associated with TB treatment and control activities far outweigh the non-reimbursed costs, the variance of $951,049 is supported by Health Realignment funds. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years.



1. Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts - Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery.

2. Authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute, upon receipt, the Acceptance of an Award from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the amount of $1,942,555 for tuberculosis control and treatment services for the period July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013, and any additional or supplemental funding during the grant term.

6/26/12 10

3. Authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to execute, upon receipt, the Acceptance of an Award from the State of California Department of Public Health in the amount of $640,834 for tuberculosis control and treatment services for the period July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013, and $1,211,056, for the Refugee Health Assessment Program for the period October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013, for total funding from the State of $1,851,890 for these services and any additional or supplemental and other program funding during the grant terms.

4. Authorize the Director, Health and Human Services Agency, to seek and apply for grants, as necessary, to fund efforts that build capacity and enhance programs for early detection and prevention of threats to the public’s health.

11. SUBJECT: MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES – COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION FOR THERAPEUTIC BEHAVIORAL SERVICES (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: The County of San Diego’s Health and Human Services Agency provides a

continuum of comprehensive mental health services for children, adolescents and their families. On October 17, 2000 (1), the Board approved the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) plan, which expanded services available within the Children’s Mental Health System of Care.

EPSDT services include Therapeutic Behavioral Services (TBS), which focus on one-on-one behavioral management for high-risk youth. These mandated services are currently provided throughout the San Diego region, serving approximately 630 children and their families each year. The current TBS contracts were awarded on July 1, 2008 and July 1, 2009 respectively and both expire on June 30, 2013. Board authority is requested to issue a competitive solicitation to reprocure TBS services with an anticipated effective date of July 1, 2013.

Today’s item requests that the Board authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting to issue a competitive solicitation to provide TBS services for children in San Diego County. This action supports the County’s adopted Live Well, San Diego! initiative by providing children and adolescents with mental health needs access to necessary resources and services to lead healthy and productive lives.

6/26/12 11


Operational Plan in the Health and Human Services Agency. If approved, this request will result in Fiscal Year 2013-14 costs and revenue in the amount of $3,947,493. Funding sources are Medi-Cal Federal Financial Participation (FFP), Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), and Mental Health Realignment. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years.



In accordance with Section 401 et seq. of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting to issue a competitive solicitation for Therapeutic Behavioral Services (TBS), and upon successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award one or more contracts for an initial term of up to one year, with up to six option years, and up to an additional six months if needed, and amend the contracts as necessary to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to the availability of funds, and subject to approval of the Director, Health and Human Services Agency.

12. SUBJECT: BOARD POLICY SUPPORTING SAN PASQUAL ACADEMY (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: San Pasqual Academy, a unique residential education program, opened in October

2001 and currently has the capacity to serve up to 184 adolescent foster youth. The Academy offers adolescent foster youth, ages 12-18 years old, placement stability, high school completion, preparation for independent living, post secondary education and employment, a permanency connection, normalized adolescent activities and aftercare services. Through a public-private partnership, the Academy creates a comprehensive and supportive environment for the youth, allowing them to thrive and reach their academic, career and personal potential.

On March 13, 2012 (5), your Board approved Chairman Roberts and Vice Chairman Cox’s recommendations for the Chief Administrative Officer to draft a Board Policy outlining the purpose and program guidelines of San Pasqual Academy as a voluntary, long-term placement option for adolescent foster youth.

Today’s action requests that your Board adopt a new Board Policy E-15 to support efforts to sustain and bolster the successful service provisions offered by San Pasqual Academy, and preserve San Pasqual Academy as an alternative, long-term, voluntary placement option for adolescent foster youth.

6/26/12 12

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.



Adopt a new Board Policy, E-15, to support the efforts to sustain and bolster the successful service provisions offered by San Pasqual Academy, and preserve San Pasqual Academy as an alternative, long-term, voluntary placement option for adolescent foster youth; include Policy E-15 in the Board of Supervisors Policy Manual.

13. SUBJECT: CONTINUATION OF THE DEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING

AND ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (DSEP) FOR YOUNG CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: Throughout the years, your Board has demonstrated a strong commitment to

enhancing the well-being of young children in the foster care system, especially those children placed at the A.B. and Jessie Polinsky Children’s Center (PCC). PCC is a 24-hour facility and Assessment Center for the temporary emergency shelter of abused and neglected children, birth to 17 years that need to be removed from their home for their safety. PCC is licensed by the State Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing (CCL) and provides a variety of on-site specialty services to address the physical, emotional and mental health needs of children while they are placed at the center. On October 7, 2003(3), the Board authorized a competitive solicitation for the physical health services at Polinsky Children’s Center. The contract was awarded to Rady Children’s Hospital. The developmental health services component of this contract was expanded in December 2008, when the First 5 Commission of San Diego (Commission) approved funding to enhance the services provided to children at PCC, and to support expanded developmental and behavioral services for all children under the age of six in out-of-home care and their caregivers. On February 10, 2009(6) the Board authorized the Purchasing and Contracting Director to enter into negotiations with Rady Children’s Hospital to amend the health services contract to expand developmental services through June 30, 2012 and to establish appropriations in the Health and Human Services Agency based on the unanticipated revenue from the Commission. On June 4, 2012, the Commission approved three additional years of funding beginning July 1, 2012 for continued support of this critical developmental services program, now entitled the Developmental Screening and Enhancement Program (DSEP). Today’s action authorizes the Director of Purchasing and Contracting to

6/26/12 13

enter into negotiations with Rady Children’s Hospital, and subject to successful negotiations, amend the existing contract to continue DSEP services in support of the County’s adopted Live Well, San Diego! initiative.

FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this request is included in the FY 2012-14 CAO Proposed Operational

Plan in the Health and Human Services Agency. If approved, this request will result in current and subsequent year costs and revenue of $3.4 million annually. The funding source is the First 5 Commission of San Diego. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years.



Authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting to enter into negotiations to amend current contract number 502041 and subject to successful negotiations, extend DSEP services for two years, July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2014; to extend the contract up to an additional six months if needed; and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to the approval of the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency.

14. SUBJECT: SENIOR SERVICES REVENUE AGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: The Board of Supervisors has demonstrated a long-term commitment to enhancing

programs focused on the safety and welfare of seniors and persons with disabilities. The County’s Health and Human Services Agency, Aging & Independence Services (AIS), administers these programs. On June 14, 2011 (4), the Board approved Fiscal Year 2011-12 revenue agreements to fund various programs supporting seniors and those with disabilities. These services allow seniors and the disabled to remain safely in their homes and to access needed community resources. This item requests Board authorization to accept $13,888,701 of federal, State and local funds for Fiscal Year 2012-13 to support these programs and services. This action supports the County’s Live Well, San Diego! Initiative by ensuring that older adults and people with disabilities are provided with the necessary services to maintain their independence.


Operational Plan for the Health and Human Services Agency. If approved, this request will result in Fiscal Year 2012-13 costs of $14,600,903 and revenue of $13,888,701. There is a required match of $712,202 which will be funded by County General Purpose Revenue. The funding sources for the $13,888,701 are the State

6/26/12 14

General Fund, Titles III, V, and VII of the Older Americans Act, federal and State HICAP funds, Title XIX Medicaid, Veterans Administration San Diego Healthcare System, Partners in Care Foundation, National Council on Aging, California Department of Public Health, Title II Corporation for National & Community Service and San Diego Gas & Electric. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years.



1. Waive Board Policy B-29: Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts - Department Responsibility for Full Cost Recovery.

2. Authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, the following revenue agreements:

Description Agreement #

California Department of Aging Area Plan Grant AP-1213-23 Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program HI-1213-23 Title V Senior Employment Program TV-1213-23 Multipurpose Senior Services Program MS-1213-07 Veterans Administration San Diego Healthcare System Partners in Care Foundation National Council on Aging California Department of Public Health Corporation for National & Community Service San Diego Gas & Electric

3. Authorize the Clerk of the Board, subject to the approval of the Director of the

Health and Human Services Agency or designee, to execute subsequent amendments and renewals to the revenue agreements and grant awards in Recommendation 2 when those documents are received from the funding sources.

4. In accordance with Board Policy B-29: Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts - Department Responsibility for Full Cost Recovery, and Health and Human Services Policy B-05: Revenue Agreements and Grants; authorize the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency, to identify and apply for grants for the purpose of obtaining financial assistance for programs serving seniors and adults with disabilities.

6/26/12 15

5. Adopt the resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF AGING REVENUE AGREEMENTS.

15. SUBJECT: HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY ACCEPTANCE

OF DONATIONS FROM KIWANIS CLUB OF ALPINE FOUNDATION (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: Administrative Code Section 66 and Board of Supervisors Policy A-112, Acceptance

of Gifts and Donations, permits the acceptance of gifts by the administrative head of each department in the County with ratification of the Board of Supervisors. Today’s item requests Board approval to accept the donation of goods and supplies valued at $5,430 from the Kiwanis Club of Alpine Foundation. The donations provide immediate, placement-related supplies for abused or neglected children removed from their homes, and help keep them in a familiar environment. This action supports the County’s adopted “Live Well, San Diego!” initiative by furthering efforts to protect vulnerable children from abuse and neglect.

FISCAL IMPACT: The East Region Neighborhoods For Kids (N4K) initiative is funded using Child

Welfare Services funding. The funding is comprised of federal Title IV-E, Title XIX, and Title XX funds and matching local funds and is used to support the core staff and corresponding services for this initiative. Approval of these recommendations will add $5,430 in gifts and donations to the resources available to support the activities for Health and Human Services Agency East Region Neighborhoods for Kids initiative.



1. In accordance with Administrative Code Section 66 and Board Policy A-112, accept the donation of goods and supplies, valued at $5,430 from the Kiwanis Club of Alpine Foundation

2. Authorize the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign a letter of appreciation on behalf of the County of San Diego, to the Kiwanis Club of Alpine Foundation.

6/26/12 16

16. SUBJECT: HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY - FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT FOR AGING AND INDEPENDENCE SERVICES, 1305 UNION PLAZA COURT, OCEANSIDE (DISTRICT: 5)

OVERVIEW: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve a First Amendment to Lease

Agreement for space used by the Aging and Independence Services function of the County’s Health and Human Services Agency at 1305 Union Plaza Court, Oceanside. The current lease with Sunrise Capital LLC for 7,308 square feet of space expires on June 30, 2012. The full-service lease rate under the proposed lease amendment is $12,789 ($1.75/square foot with 3 percent annual rent increases), which is approximately $3,075 per month less than the current monthly rent.

FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this request are included in the Health and Human Services Agency’s

Fiscal Year 2012-13 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in current year costs and revenue of $153,468 for Fiscal Year 2012-13. The funding source is Social Services Administrative revenue. Under the negotiated lease amendment, the lease rate will decrease from $2.17 to $1.75 per square foot. The rent savings for Fiscal Year 2012-13 will be $36,900. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years are required.



1. Find, in accordance with Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, that approval of the lease amendment is categorically exempt from the provisions of the guidelines because it involves the continuation of an existing lease with no expansion of the existing use.

2. Approve and authorize the Director of the Department of General Services to execute the First Amendment to Lease Agreement.

6/26/12 17

17. SUBJECT: SET HEARING FOR 8/7/12: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY – 4.14 ACRES, SHERIDAN ROAD, CAMPO, COUNTY PARCEL NO. 2012-0045-A; ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 656-040-62 (6/26/12 - SURPLUS DECLARATION/RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO SELL; 8/7/12 - BID OPENING) (DISTRICT: 2)

OVERVIEW: The County of San Diego owns 4.14 acres on Sheridan Road in the Community of

Campo. The County acquired this property from the Mountain Empire School District in 1979. The property contains four old warehouses that were constructed by the military as part of Camp Lockett. The property was previously leased for storage and is now considered to be surplus to the County’s needs.

This action requires two steps. On June 26, 2012, the Board will consider declaring the subject property surplus to County needs, adopting a Resolution of Intention to Sell, directing the Clerk of the Board to advertise the County’s intent to sell, and setting a date for a bid-opening hearing. If, on June 26, 2012, the Board takes the action recommended, then on August 7, 2012, after making necessary environmental findings, the Board is requested to conduct a bid opening and approve the sale of the parcel to the highest bidder. The minimum bid is $25,000.

FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this request are not budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2012-13 CAO Proposed

Operational Plan for the Capital Outlay Fund. If approved, this request will result in one-time revenue of at least $25,000 (the minimum bid) for the all-cash sale of the property. Expenses and staff costs incurred by the Department of General Services (DGS) to process and manage the sale of land are estimated at $5,000. The estimated costs incurred by DGS will be offset against the proceeds from the sale of land to reimburse the Facilities Management Internal Service Fund. Pursuant to Board Policy B-37, all remaining funds will be deposited into the Capital Outlay Fund. No additional staff years are required.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: If this sale is consummated, the use of this property may generate minor business

activity in the community of Campo.


On June 26, 2012: 1. Find that the proposed action to set a hearing to consider approving the sale of

County Parcel 2012-0045-A is exempt from review pursuant to Section 15060 (c)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, as it is not a project as defined under Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

2. Declare County Parcel 2012-0045-A surplus to County needs.

6/26/12 18

3. Approve and adopt the Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO SELL REAL PROPERTY AND NOTICE INVITING BIDS. (4 VOTES)

4. Direct the Clerk of the Board to advertise the Notice of Intention to Sell County Parcel 2012-0045-A in accordance with Government Code Sections 25526 and 6063.

5. Set a hearing for August 7, 2012, at which time the Board of Supervisors may

conduct a bid opening and approve the sale of County Parcel 2012-0045-A to the highest bidder.

If, on June 26, 2012, the Board takes the actions recommended in Items 1-5 above, then on August 7, 2012:

1. Find, in accordance with Article 19, Section 15312 of the CEQA Guidelines, that the sale of County Parcel 2012-0045-A (APN 656-040-62 Portion) is categorically exempt from the provisions of the CEQA Guidelines as it is a sale of surplus government property.

2. Conduct the bid opening and approve the sale of County Parcel 2012-0045-A to the highest bidder.

3. Authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to perform all necessary actions to complete the sale, including the execution of the escrow instructions, and a Grant Deed.

18. SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - APPROVE NEW LEASE AT 5252/54/58 KEARNY VILLA WAY, SAN DIEGO (DISTRICT: 4)

OVERVIEW: The redevelopment of the County Operations Center will require the demolition of

Building 5 and Building 6 to permit construction of a new building for the Registrar of Voters and other County departments. The Materials Engineering Lab, Watershed Protection Program Science and Monitoring Lab, Street Light Maintenance, and the Flood Control sections of the Department of Public Works will need to be relocated as a result of the demolition and construction work. Staff has identified 9,207 square feet of office/industrial space for lease at 5252/54/58 Kearny Villa Way in Kearny Mesa that is a suitable relocation site for this use. The Board is requested to approve a new five-year lease agreement for this space with Hazard Capital Assets, LP. The occupancy cost for the proposed lease includes monthly rent of $9,575 ($1.04/square foot) and utility costs and custodial services paid by the County. The Facilities Management Division of the Department of General Services will provide tenant improvements required to make the space functional. Hazard Capital Assets, LP, as part of the lease agreement, will reimburse the County for $46,035 of these tenant improvements. The proposed rental rate is within the range of recent comparable transactions for space of this type in the Kearny Mesa market area.

6/26/12 19


Operational Plan for Department of Public Works and the Capital Outlay Fund. If approved, this request will result in lease costs and estimated utility and custodial costs of $117,267 for Fiscal Year 2012-13 and lease costs of $150,372 for Fiscal Year 2013-14. The funding source for the lease costs is the Department of Public Works Road Fund. The lease commences July 1, 2012. There are three months of rent abatement during Fiscal Year 2012-13. If approved, this request will also result in estimated costs of $300,000 to complete the tenant improvements at the leased space and pay for one-time moving costs. Funding for tenant improvements will be provided for by the owner of the leased space ($46,035) and Capital Project 1017221 HHSA PSG CSG Office Relocation ($253,965). No additional staff years are required.



1. Find, in accordance with Section 15301 (a) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, that this project is exempt from the provisions of the Act, because it involves the continuation of an existing use.

2. Establish appropriations of $46,035 in the Contributions to Capital Outlay Fund, Operating Transfer Out, to provide funds for the HHSA PSG CSG Office Relocation project, based on reimbursement for tenant improvements. (4 VOTES)

3. Establish appropriations of $46,035 in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project 1015131, HHSA PSG CSG Office Relocation based on unanticipated revenue received from Hazard Capital Assets, LP for the reimbursement of tenant improvements. (4 VOTES)

4. Approve and authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to execute the lease with Hazard Capital Assets, a California limited partnership, for 9,207 square feet located at 5252/54/58 Kearny Villa Way, San Diego.

5. Authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to exercise the option to extend the lease, prior to its expiration, and to amend the lease as needed to implement the extension terms.

6/26/12 20

19. SUBJECT: GREEN PROGRAMS ON MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: At military bases across the nation, the Department of Defense has mandated

reductions in energy consumption and participation in recycling programs. The largest military installation in San Diego County, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, has taken this directive seriously and has implemented green programs on many fronts.

According to published reports, the Department of Defense consumes 300,000 barrels of oil a day and is the largest single consumer of energy in the world. From base to battlefield, the military’s leadership understands that using less energy saves the environment and saves taxpayer dollars.

At Camp Pendleton, numerous construction projects have received awards for their environmental sensitivity. The base draws some of its electricity from solar panels installed atop an old landfill. An aggressive recycling program accepts everything from waste paper to spent brass shell casings.

Camp Pendleton is leading by example with its aggressive approach to resource management. Accordingly, we have invited representatives from the base to highlight their programs in a presentation to the Board of Supervisors.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A


RECOMMENDATION: SUPERVISOR SLATER-PRICE AND SUPERVISOR HORN

Receive presentation.

20. SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT GRANTS & AMENDMENTS (DISTRICT: 5)

OVERVIEW: Neighborhood Reinvestment Program funding assists non-profit organizations in

providing essential services to citizens of San Diego County. Reinvesting taxpayer money in worthwhile organizations is a benefit to the citizens and communities of North County.

6/26/12 21

FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of these recommendations is $160,801. The funding source is the

Neighborhood Reinvestment budget (15670). This action will result in the addition of no new staff years and no future costs.


RECOMMENDATION: SUPERVISOR HORN

1. Allocate $25,000 from Neighborhood Reinvestment budget (15670) to the Boys & Girls Club of Vista to help cover the costs of renovating the Club’s gym in Vista.

2. Allocate $5,775 from Neighborhood Reinvestment budget (15670) to the

Fallbrook Land Conservancy to make needed improvements to the historic Palomares House.

3. Allocate $50,000 from Neighborhood Reinvestment budget (15670) to the

American Heritage Education Foundation to aid in offsetting costs to renovate the Foundation’s educational facility.

4. Allocate $12,600 from Neighborhood Reinvestment budget (15670) to the Rancho

Santa Fe Seniors, Inc. for restoration of the senior center grounds and historic structure and an upgrade to the facility’s telephone system.

5. Allocate $50,000 from Neighborhood Reinvestment budget (15670) to the San

Diego North Economic Development Council to help cover the costs to complete a quality of life study in the North County region, including the development of a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy and performance of an Economic Impact Analysis. Waive Board Policy B-72 with respect to the purposes for which grants may be made.

6. Allocate $17,426 from Neighborhood Reinvestment budget (15670) to the Pauma

Valley Community Association to help replace the roof of the Pauma Valley Community Center.

7. Amend the purpose of the October 27, 2008 allocation of $100,000 to Veterans

Association of North County (VANC) to include renovations and repairs to begin to restore the interior of the VANC facility.

8. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute a grant agreement with the

organizations listed above, establishing terms for receipt of the funds described above and to make minor amendments to the agreement that are consistent with the general purpose of the grant but do not increase the grant.

9. Find that these grant awards have a public purpose.

6/26/12 22

10. Find that the allocations in recommendations 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301.

21. SUBJECT: NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE VILLAGE GROVE APARTMENTS IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $18,000,000 (DISTRICT: 3)

OVERVIEW: The County has received a request from the California Municipal Finance Authority

(“CMFA” or “Authority”) to conduct a public hearing as required by the Internal Revenue Code and to approve the Authority’s issuance of revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $18,000,000 (“Bonds”), for the benefit of Wasatch Advantage Group ("Borrower"), a California limited partnership. The Borrower will use the proceeds of the Bonds to pay for the acquisition and rehabilitation of a 161-unit multifamily housing rental facility currently known as Village Grove Apartments located at 660 North Quince Street, in the City of Escondido, County of San Diego, California 92025 (“Project”).

The Authority is authorized to assist in financing for nonprofit public benefit organizations, or other corporations with a public benefit, wishing to issue revenue obligations, including the Borrower. In order to initiate such a financing, a member jurisdiction in which the Project resides, i.e., the County of San Diego, must: (1) conduct a public hearing to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code; and (2) approve the Authority’s issuance of the Bonds. Although the Authority will be the issuer of the Bonds for the Borrower, the financing cannot proceed without the approval of the County of San Diego. Today’s recommendations will provide the Authority with the required authorization to pursue its determination to issue the Bonds on behalf of the Borrower for the Project

FISCAL IMPACT: If approved, the proposal will result in $1,000 of unanticipated revenue to be used to

reimburse the County for costs associated with this non-County financing. No additional staff years will be required.

The Borrower will be responsible for the payment of all present and future costs in connection with issuance of the financing. The County will incur no obligation of indebtedness as a result of these actions.


6/26/12 23


1. Pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, hold a public hearing regarding the financing of the Project.

2. Adopt a resolution entitled:

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING VILLAGE GROVE APARTMENTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO BE FORMED BY WASATCH ADVANTAGE GROUP IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $18,000,000 AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.

22. SUBJECT: NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $13,500,000 (DISTRICTS: 1 & 4)

OVERVIEW: The County has received a request from the California Municipal Finance Authority

(“CMFA” or “Authority”) to conduct a public hearing as required by the Internal Revenue Code and to approve the Authority’s issuance of revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $13,500,000 (“Bonds”), for the benefit of The San Diego Society of Natural History (“Borrower”), a nonprofit public benefit corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California. The Borrower anticipates using the proceeds of the Bonds to refinance certain of its outstanding obligations which were used to finance the acquisition and installation of certain improvements to the real property and improvements to the San Diego Natural History Museum located at 1788 El Prado, San Diego, California 92101 (“Museum”) and a warehouse facility located at 1339 Roosevelt Street, National City, California 91950 (“Warehouse”).

The Authority is authorized to assist in financing for nonprofit public benefit organizations, or other corporations with a public benefit, wishing to issue revenue obligations, including the Borrower. In order to initiate such a financing, a member jurisdiction in which the Project resides, i.e., the County of San Diego, must: (1) conduct a public hearing to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code; and (2) approve the Authority’s issuance of the Bonds. Although the Authority will be the issuer of the Bonds for the Borrower, the financing cannot proceed without the approval of the County of San Diego. Today’s

6/26/12 24

recommendations will provide the Authority with the required authorization to pursue its determination to issue the Bonds on behalf of the Project for the Project.0.

FISCAL IMPACT: If approved, the proposal will result in $1,000 of unanticipated revenue to be used to

reimburse the County for costs associated with this non-County financing. No additional staff years will be required.

The Borrower will be responsible for the payment of all present and future costs in connection with issuance of the financing. The County will incur no obligation of indebtedness as a result of these actions.



1. Pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, hold a public hearing regarding the financing of the Project.

2. Adopt a resolution entitled:

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT REVENUE OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY OR A SUCCESSOR ENTITY IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $13,500,000 AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.

23. SUBJECT: BUDGET DELIBERATIONS: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER PROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14 (DISTRICTS: ALL) (Note: Public Hearings on the Operational Plan took place beginning June 11, 2012 and closed at 5 p.m. on June 20, 2012. There will be no public testimony for this item at 2 p.m.)

OVERVIEW: On May 8, 2012 (14), the Board of Supervisors received the Chief Administrative

Officer Proposed Operational Plan Fiscal Years 2012-13 and 2013-14 (CAO Proposed Operational Plan) and set the dates and times for public hearings and deliberations. The proposed amendments to the CAO Proposed Operational Plan are based on updated expenditure and revenue information and recent Board actions. Today’s action requests the Board approve the CAO Proposed Operational Plan and

REVISION 1

6/26/12 25

the Change Letter requests at the conclusion of budget deliberations. Budget deliberations are scheduled to commence on June 26, 2012. A resolution of adoption is expected to be before the Board on August 7, 2012.

FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed changes to the CAO Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Years

2012-13 and 2013-14, include for Fiscal Year 2012-13 appropriation increases of $29.1 million and an increase of 52.25 staff years. Changes for Fiscal Year 2013-14 include appropriation increases of $33.9 million and an increase of 159.25 staff years. The total revised CAO Proposed Operational Plan is $4.80 billion for Fiscal Year 2012-13 and $4.65 billion for Fiscal Year 2013-14. The total revised staff years are 16,010.75 in Fiscal Year 2012-13 and 16,114.75 in Fiscal Year 2013-14. The Fiscal Year 2012-13 proposed increases in appropriations are supported by $4.0 million in fund balance and $25.1 million in program revenues. The Fiscal Year 2013-14 proposed increases in appropriations are supported by $0.7 million in fund balance and $33.2 million in program revenues.

BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: The changes to the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include the purchase of goods

and services from the private sector.


1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 29064, approve the Chief Administrative Officer Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2012-13 on or before June 30, 2012, for the purpose of having the authority to spend until the budget is adopted.

2. Accept the appropriation, funding and staffing changes to the Chief Administrative Officer Proposed Operational Plan Fiscal Years 2012-13 and 2013-14 as shown in the attached schedules for consideration during budget deliberations.

3. Following budget deliberations and approval of the Chief Administrative Officer Proposed Operational Plan Fiscal Years 2012-13 and 2013-14, authorize the Chief Financial Officer to make adjustments as necessary between object accounts with no increases in total departmental appropriations in order to clarify all budget items for the final Operational Plan and budget resolution.

24. SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO THE CIVIL SERVICE RULES

(DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: In an ongoing effort to streamline and modernize County hiring process and

practices, the Human Resources Department conducted an internal review of existing Civil Service Rules to identify provisions which were in need of modernization.

6/26/12 26

These provisions include changes to Rule II Applications, Rule III Examinations and Employment Lists, Rule IV Certification and Appointments, Rule XIV Layoff, Reinstatement, Resignation and Separation and Rule XVII Glossary. These changes will permit Human Resources and Department staff to better facilitate the processing of online employment applications and to produce more accurate and timely eligible lists to Departments. The proposed Rule changes have been distributed and reviewed by all employee organizations, and following the completion of the meet and confer process, were approved by the Civil Service Commission at the Commission’s June 6, 2012 meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. There will be no

change in net General Fund costs and no additional staff years.



Adopt the revised Civil Service Rules.

25. SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM:

SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: On June 19, 2012 (16), the Board of Supervisors introduced the Ordinance for further

consideration and adoption on June 26, 2012. The proposed amendments to the San Diego County Compensation Ordinance are part of the ongoing efforts to manage and maintain a skilled and competent workforce dedicated to sustaining operational excellence and serving the public. These amendments include: amending class characteristics for one (1) classification in the unclassified service; re-titling one (1) classification in the unclassified service; deleting five (5) obsolete classifications; and amending sections of the Compensation Ordinance pertaining to Compensation for Working on County Holidays; Charges for Maintenance, County Owned and Maintained Housing Facilities; Pandemic Advanced Credit Leave; and Voluntary Time Off.


Operational Plan for the respective departments. There will be no increase in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years.

6/26/12 27



Adopt the Ordinance entitled:

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION.

26. SUBJECT: COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: Board Policy A-72, Board of Supervisors Agenda and Related Process, authorizes the

Clerk of the Board to prepare a Communications Received for Board of Supervisors' Official Records. Routine informational reports, which need to be brought to the attention of the Board of Supervisors yet not requiring action, are listed on this document. Communications Received documents are on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A



Note and File.

27. SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: APPOINTMENTS (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: These appointments are in accordance with applicable Board Policy A-74, “Citizen

Participation in County Boards, Commissions and Committees.”

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A


RECOMMENDATION: SUPERVISOR JACOB

Re-appoint Barry Bardack to the GILLESPIE FIELD DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, Seat No. 1 for a term to expire June 25, 2016.

6/26/12 28

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER Confirm the appointment of Mark Muir as the primary representative from the City of Encinitas to the COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 17 – SAN DIEGUITO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Seat No. 1. In accordance with the Committee bylaws, “the term of office shall be at the discretion of the appointing organization.”

28. SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT PROGRAM AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: 1)

OVERVIEW: The County of San Diego is fortunate to have an opportunity to reinvest taxpayer

money into our communities for the benefit of the public. This action will assist the County in meeting the needs of the community.

FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of these 3 Neighborhood Reinvestment Program grants is

$121,558.87. These actions will result in the addition of no staff years and no future costs.


RECOMMENDATION: VICE CHAIRMAN GREG COX:

1. Establish appropriations of $158.03 in the Community Enhancement Program budget (org 12900) based on the return of the unused portion of the 6/29/2010(11) allocation of $10,000 to San Diego Filipino-American Humanitarian Foundation so the funds can be reallocated to other projects. (4 VOTES)

2. Establish appropriations of $20.00 in the Community Enhancement Program budget (org 12900) based on the return of the unused portion of the 6/24/08 (11) allocation of $3,000 to Butterworth Dance Company so the funds can be reallocated to other projects. (4 VOTES)

3. Establish appropriations of $3,500.00 in the Community Enhancement Program budget (org 12900) based on the return of the unused portion of the 6/29/2010 (11) allocation of $3,500 to House of Mexico so the funds can be reallocated to other projects. (4 VOTES)

4. Allocate $3,678.03 from the Community Enhancement Program (Org 12900) to the Bonita Historical Society to assist with costs for general museum expenses.

REVISION 1

6/26/12 29

5. Allocate $100,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program budget (Org 15650) to the City of San Diego for capital planning costs associated with the Chollas Creek Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail project, including preliminary engineering and environmental studies.

6. Allocate $5,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program budget (Org 15650) to the Unified Port of San Diego for capital planning costs associated with the Coronado flag pole project, including site planning, conceptual drawings, and administrative costs associated with managing the project.

7. Allocate $16,558.87 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program budget (Org 15650) to the San Diego Rescue Mission for the purchase of commercial washing machines to be installed at the organization’s facility at 120 Elm Street in San Diego.

8. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with these organizations establishing terms for receipt of the funds described above and to make minor amendments to the agreements that are consistent with the general purpose of the grant but do not increase the grant.

9. Find that the grant awards described above have a public purpose.

29. SUBJECT: ALLOCATION AND AMENDMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT FUNDS (DISTRICT: 4)

OVERVIEW: The County’s fiscal condition has enabled it to reinvest taxpayer money in our

communities for the benefit of the public. These recommended actions propose allocations to new projects from the County of San Diego’s Neighborhood Reinvestment Project Funds.

FISCAL IMPACT: The total combined cost of the proposed recommendations is $612,656.66

Appropriations are available in the Neighborhood Reinvestment Budget (15665). This action will result in the addition of no staff years and no future costs.


6/26/12 30

RECOMMENDATION: CHAIRMAN ROBERTS

1. Allocate $75,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to the Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater San Diego to assist with the cost of renovating its existing office buildings to provide administrative offices at the Claremont facility. The allocation will also assist in purchasing furnishings, fixtures and equipment for the newly renovated office space and the Resource and Training Center that is currently being built at the same location.

2. Allocate $28,970 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to ElderHelp Senior Services Center to assist with the cost of expanding and renovating its current office location at 4069 30th Street in North Park.

3. Allocate $7,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to FreePB.org to purchase dumpster-sized corrugated cardboard trash and recycle containers, posters promoting responsible beach and park use, and trash and recycling bags for beach cleanup efforts during Summer 2012.

4. Allocate $30,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Girl Scouts San Diego to assist with the cost to replace 1,351 linear feet of perimeter fence in 6-foot and 8-foot heights, construct a retaining wall, and site prep, which includes brush clearing and tree removal, at the Girl Scouts’ Balboa Park property and to purchase a tractor.

5. Allocate $20,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Holly Drive Leadership Academy to purchase computers, printers and auxiliary computer equipment for the Academy.

6. Allocate $3,879 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Council of Community Clinics to purchase software upgrades for emergency radios at 12 community clinics and health centers in San Diego County.

7. Allocate $20,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Make-A-Wish San Diego to cover the capital expenses of in-home improvements for children participating in the program well as a laser printer and desktop computers and auxiliary computer equipment for staff use.

8. Allocate $7,422 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Miracle Babies to purchase computers, printers, file cabinet and auxiliary computer equipment for the organization’s office and to assist with the cost of producing educational materials about core Miracle Babies programs.

6/26/12 31

9. Allocate $75,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Pro Kids Golf Academy to assist with the cost of constructing a multi-purpose athletic field and athletic conditioning center at the Academy.

10. Allocate $15,384 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Ronald McDonald House Charities for the purchase of a commercial grade washing machine for the Ronald McDonald House in San Diego.

11. Allocate $15,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to San Diego Asian Film Foundation to assist with costs of purchasing a van and equipment such as a generator, flood lights and a portable screen for the new “Drive Out Cinema” program, as well as 3 “DSLR” camera’s to expand the “Reel Voices” program.

12. Allocate $40,491 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to San Diego Center for Children to underwrite the cost of relocating the facility’s lobby to enhance the safety and security of the children who live at the Center.

13. Allocate $20,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to San Diego Hospice to update the San Diego Hospice and the Institute for Palliative Medicine with a wireless network to make every place within the facilities a working space.

14. Allocate $20,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to the Japanese Friendship Garden of San Diego to purchase educational garden furnishings, a decomposed granite path, plants and a security fence for its new children’s garden at Balboa Park.

15. Allocate $25,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation (EDC) to assist with the costs of purchasing computers, auxiliary computer equipment, a Sharp Interactive White Board and an exhibit booth with banner.

16. Allocate $25,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Stepping Stone of San Diego, INC. to assist with costs to upgrade technology systems and to furnish a women’s sober living facility in San Diego with beds, kitchen equipment, living room furniture and other furnishings.

17. Allocate $25,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Union of Pan Asian Communities to assist with the cost of repairs to the agency's main office at 1031 25th Street in Golden Hills to prevent future flooding in the office.

6/26/12 32

18. Allocate $25,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to USD Hahn School of Nursing to update and equip the school’s simulation and standardized patient nursing laboratory with 6 beds, 1 crib, 1 exam table and 1 medical dosing system.

19. Allocate $50,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to The George E. Barnes Family Junior Tennis Center: Youth Tennis San Diego to assist with the construction of the Booth Education building to augment the existing programs at the Barnes Tennis Center.

20. Allocate $50,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to the Zoological Society of San Diego to help construct a new koala exhibit and Queenslander-style care center at the San Diego Zoo.

21. Allocate $25,000 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Senior Community Centers to assist with the costs of needed repairs and improvements to their senior housing facility’s heating/air conditioning system, furniture, fixtures, appliances and painting.

22. Allocate $9,510.66 from the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program Budget (org 15665) to Tecolote Youth Baseball to assist in the cost to renovate and improve its baseball facility at 4675 Tecolote Road. These improvements include removing the current existing sod and replacing it with new turf, replacing fencing, constructing new shade structures and removing and reconstructing pitching machine area.

23. Establish appropriations of $1,200.00 in the Neighborhood Reinvestment Program budget (org 15665) based on the return of an unused portion of the 04/08/2008(12) allocation of $10,000 to Southern Sudanese Community Center of San Diego so the funds can be reallocated to other projects. (4 VOTES)

24. Find that all grant awards described above have a public purpose.

25. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to take all actions necessary to execute grant agreements with these organizations establishing terms for receipt of the funds described above, and to make minor amendments to the agreements that are consistent with the general purpose of the grant, but not to increase the amount of the grant.

26. Find that the allocations to the Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater San Diego, ElderHelp Senior Services Center, Girl Scouts San Diego, Pro Kids Golf Academy, San Diego Center for Children, Union of Pan Asian Communities, George E. Barnes Family Junior Tennis Center: Youth Tennis San Diego, Zoological Society of San Diego, Senior Community Centers and Tecolote Youth Baseball are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301.

6/26/12 33

30. SUBJECT: CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICTS: ALL)

OVERVIEW: A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS

(Government Code section 54957.6) Designated Representatives: Don Turko, Jeannine Seher Employee Organizations: All


Exhibit “C”

Your CountyGovernment

CommunityServices

HealthyKids & Families

BusinessResources

Environment Public Safety Jobs

Clerk of the Board ofSupervisors

Clerk of the Board

Meetings of the Board ofSupervisors

Air Pollution ControlHearing Board

Boards, Commissions andCommittees

Community EnhancementApplication

County AdministrationCenter

County Volunteer Program

Disclosure Activities

Notary Public

Official County Documents

Passports

Property Tax AssessmentAppeals

Subdivision Maps

Forms

Local Government Links

Board Meeting: RegularAgenda Index: Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Statement of Proceedings/MinutesDocument Search

Printer Friendly

Submit a comment online for upcoming items before the Board of Supervisors.

Notice: The Board of Supervisors may take any action with respect to the items included onthis agenda. Recommendations made by County staff do not limit actions that the Board ofSupervisors may take. Members of the public should not rely upon the recommendations in theBoard Letter as determinative of the action the Board of Supervisors may take on a particularmatter.

Item Subject Attachments/Supporting Documentation

1 SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT REQUESTFOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENTOF CRIME ANALYSIS SOFTWARESOLUTION (DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:SHF 062612 CRIMEVIEW BL.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_ApprovalLog6140800c727801754dd.htmSupport_cob_bl_document_ApprovalLog6140800c727801754e3.htm

Minute Order:06-26-2012_Regular_mo_1.docx

2 SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT REQUESTFOR THE PROCUREMENT OFMEDICAL SERVICES FOR INMATES(DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:SHF062612UCSD.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_ApprovalLog6140800c727801754de.htmSupport_cob_bl_document_ApprovalLog6140800c727801754e1.htm


3 OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES- ACCEPTANCE OF HOME DEPOTFOUNDATION DONATIONS(DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:OES Home Depot Donations Board Letter.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_OES Home DepotApproval Log.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_OES Home DepotThank You letter.doc


County of San Diego: Board of Supervisors Agenda http://bosagenda.sdcounty.ca.gov/agendadocs/materials.jsp

1 of 6 6/26/2012 10:07 PM

4 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT2011 - ADOPT AN ORDINANCE FORTHE HOME DETENTION PROGRAM

Board Letter:Public Safety Realignment2011_06262012.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_ApprovalLog6150800c727801752e8.htmSupport_cob_bl_document_Attachment AEast Mesa Ordinance Normal - clean.docSupport_cob_bl_document_Attachment BEast Mesa Ordinance Normal -informational.docSupport_cob_bl_document_Attachment CSummary of Proposed Ordinance.docSupport_cob_bl_document_Attachment DSheriffHmDetElectronicMonitoringRulesRegs.pdf


5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDINGCHAPTER 3 OF DIVISION 1, TITLE 3OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODERELATING TO EMERGENCYSERVICES AND RESOLUTIONUPDATING THE COUNTYSDESIGNATIONS OF AUTHORIZEDAGENTS FOR EMERGENCYSERVICES FUNDING (DISTRICT:ALL)

Board Letter:ESO Amendment BL 061912.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_ApprovalLog670800c727801743d0.htmSupport_cob_bl_document_ESO Attach A053112 CLEAN ESO AMENDED.docSupport_cob_bl_document_ESO Attach B053112 STRIKE OUT ESO Amendments.docSupport_cob_bl_document_ESO Attach CSUMMARY OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE.docSupport_cob_bl_document_ESO Attach D053112DesignationOfApplicantAgentResolution061912.doc

6 2011-2012 LETS MOVE! COUNTYREPORT (DISTRICT:ALL)(DISTRICTS: ALL)

Board Letter:062612 Lets Move BL.docx

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_062612Lets_Move attachment.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_062612 SignedLets move BL.pdf

7 GRANDPARENTS RAISINGGRANDCHILDREN STATUS REPORT(DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:Grandparents raising Grandchildren BoardLetter.FINAL.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_GrandparentsRaising Grandchildren Approval Log.htm

8 REVIEW AND COMMENT ON THEREVISED FIRST 5 COMMISSIONSTRATEGIC PLAN (DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:Strat Plan Review and Comment FY11-12.FINAL.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26 F5Strat Plan Review - Approval Log.htmSupport_cob_bl_document_Revised First 5Strategic Plan.pdf

9 AGING & INDEPENDENCESERVICES AREA PLAN FOR FISCALYEARS 2012-2016 (DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:AIS Area Plan - final - ts.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_AIS Area Plan


2 of 6 6/26/2012 10:07 PM

Approval Log.htmSupport_cob_bl_document_Area Plan2012-2016 - final 061812.pdf

10 FISCAL YEAR 2012-13TUBERCULOSIS CONTROLREVENUES AND SERVICES(DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:TB FY12-13 TB Revenues.FINAL.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_TB ApprovalLog.htm

11 MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES -COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION FORTHERAPEUTIC BEHAVIORALSERVICES (DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:TBS Board Letter 6-26-12 Final Draft.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_TBS ApprovalLog.htm

12 BOARD POLICY SUPPORTING SANPASQUAL ACADEMY (DISTRICT:ALL)

Board Letter:Board Policy Supporting San PasqualAcademy.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_Board PolicySupporting San Pasqual Academy_APPROVALLOG.htmSupport_cob_bl_document_San PasqualAcademy Board Policy E-15.doc

13 CONTINUATION OF THEDEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING ANDENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (DSEP)FOR YOUNG CHILDREN IN FOSTERCARE (DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:CCWS_DSEP-First Five BL-FINAL.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_DSEP ApprovalLog.htm

14 SENIOR SERVICES REVENUEAGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR2012-2013 (DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:FY 1213 AIS Revenue Agreements -final.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_1213CDA_Revenue Resolution - final.docSupport_cob_bl_document_AIS RevenueAgreements Approval Log.htm

15 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESAGENCY ACCEPTANCE OFDONATIONS FROM KIWANIS CLUBOF ALPINE FOUNDATION(DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:Kiwanis of Alpine BL FINAL.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_Kiwanis ApprovalLog.htm

16 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESAGENCY - FIRST AMENDMENT TOLEASE AGREEMENT FOR AGINGAND INDEPENDENCE SERVICES,1305 UNION PLAZA COURT,OCEANSIDE (DISTRICT: 5)

Board Letter:2012-06-26-DGS-HHSA-AIS_Oside_FirstAmendment_BL.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26-DGS_HHSA-AIS_Oside_First Amendment_to_Lease-ApprovalLog.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_2012-06-29-DGS-HHSA-AIS_Oside_FirstAmend_LEASECOMPS.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_2012-06-29-DGS_HHSA-AIS_Oside_First Amendment_to_Lease-HoldingCopy.pdf


3 of 6 6/26/2012 10:07 PM

17 SALE OF REAL PROPERTY - 4.14ACRES, SHERIDAN ROAD, CAMPO,COUNTY PARCEL NO. 2012-0045-A;ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER656-040-62 (6/26/12 - SurplusDeclaration/Resolution of Intent toSell; 8/7/12 - Bid Opening)(DISTRICT: 2)

Board Letter:2012-06-26and2012-08-07-DGS-SheridanRoad Campo-BL-fnl.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26and2012-08-07-DGS-Sheridan Road Campo-Notice of Intent.docSupport_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26and2012-08-07-DGS-Sheridan Road Campo-Resolution-fnl.docSupport_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26and2012-08-07-DGS-SheridanRoadCamp-Approval Log.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26and2012-08-07-DGS-SheridanRoadCamp-AttachA-SiteMap.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26and2012-08-07-DGS-SheridanRoadCamp-LegalAdRequest.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26and2012-08-07-DGS-SheridanRoadCamp-Resolution.pdf

18 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS -APPROVE NEW LEASE AT5252/54/58 KEARNY VILLA WAY,SAN DIEGO (DISTRICT: 4)

Board Letter:2012-06-29-DGS-DPW_KearnyMesaFacility-BL.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26-DGS-DPW-KearnyMesaLease-ApprovalLog.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26-DGS-DPW-KearnyMesaLease-HoldingCopy.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_2012-06-26-DGS-DPW-KearnyMesaLease-LEASE COMPS-AttachA.pdf

19 GREEN PROGRAMS ON MARINECORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON(DISTRICTS: ALL)

Board Letter:Green Programs BL.docx

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_062612 SignedGreen Programs BL.pdf

20 NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENTGRANTS & AMENDMENTS(DISTRICT 5)

Board Letter:062612 NRP BL D5.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_062612 SignedNPR BL D5.pdf

21 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BYTHE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPALFINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THEBENEFIT OF THE VILLAGE GROVEAPARTMENTS IN AN AGGREGATEAMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED$18,000,000 (DISTRICT: 3)

Board Letter:FGG Jun 26 TEFRA Hearing CMFA forWasatch.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_Approval Log-CMFA for Village Grove Apts.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_FGG Jun 26CMFA for Village Grove Apts Att 1. CountyResolution.docSupport_cob_bl_document_FGG Jun 26CMFA for Village Grove Apts Att 2. Notice ofHearing.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_FGG Jun 26CMFA for Village Grove Apts Att 3. CMFAApplication.doc.pdf


4 of 6 6/26/2012 10:07 PM

22 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BYTHE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPALFINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THEBENEFIT OF THE SAN DIEGOSOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY INAN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TOEXCEED $13,500,000 (DISTRICTS:1 & 4)

Board Letter:FGG June 26 TEFRA Hearing CMFA for NaturalHistory Museum.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_Approval LogCMFA for Nat History Museum.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_FGG Jun 26CMFA for Nat History Museum Att 1-CountyResolution.docSupport_cob_bl_document_FGG Jun 26CMFA for Nat History Museum Att 2. Notice ofPublic Hearing.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_FGG Jun 26CMFA for Nat History Museum Att 3. CMFAApplication.pdf

23 BUDGET DELIBERATIONS: CHIEFADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERPROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLANFISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND2013-14 CHANGE LETTER(DISTRICTS: ALL)

Board Letter:Budget Deliberations Board Letter.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_Approval Log.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_BudgetDeliberations Supplement.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_CAO ProposedOperational Plan Change Letter 2012-14.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_Change LetterRequest - District 4.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_CommunityEnhancement Allocations-All Districts.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_WrittenTestimony.pdf

24 AMENDMENTS TO THE CIVILSERVICE RULES (DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:06 26 12 BoardLetter_CSC RulesRevisions.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_Approval LogCSR Rules Revision.htmSupport_cob_bl_document_Civil ServiceRules Clean 06 26 12.docSupport_cob_bl_document_Civil ServiceRules Strikeout 06 26 12.docSupport_cob_bl_document_Table ofAdministrative Changes to the CSC Rules 0626 2012.doc

25 AMENDMENTS TO THECOMPENSATION ORDINANCE(DISTRICT: ALL)

Board Letter:BoardLetter_Regular_06 19 12.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_Comp Ord Brd Lt6_19_12Approval Log.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_Comp Ord CLEANVersion 06-19-2012.doc

26 COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED(DISTRICTS: ALL)

Board Letter:062612CRbl.doc

Attachments:Support__CRList.htmlSupport_cob_bl_document_062612CRApprovalLog.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_062612CRList.pdf

27 APPOINTMENTS (DISTRICTS: ALL) Board Letter:COB June 26 2012 Appointments.doc


5 of 6 6/26/2012 10:07 PM

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_ApprovalLogAppointments062612.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_COB 062612Appt Supporting docs.pdf

28 NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENTPROGRAM AND COMMUNITYENHANCEMENT PROGRAM(DISTRICT: 1)

Board Letter:062612NeigboorhoodReinvestDist1.docx

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_062612NeighborhoodReinvstmtD1.pdf

29 ALLOCATION AND AMENDMENT OFNEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENTFUNDS (DISTRICT: 4)

Board Letter:062612 NRP BL D4.docx

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_062612NRPD4.pdf

30 CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICTS:ALL)

Board Letter:062612 ClosedSession.doc

Attachments:Support_cob_bl_document_062612ClosedSession.pdfSupport_cob_bl_document_Closed SessionOff Docket Item 1.pdf

County Departments | Accessibility Policy | Web & Privacy Policies | Help | Contact Us | Visiting San Diego


6 of 6 6/26/2012 10:07 PM


Exhibit “D”

1

Cory Briggs

From: Cory BriggsSent: Monday, June 25, 2012 12:14 PMTo: '[email protected]'Subject: Agenda for June 26, 2012 MeetingAttachments: IMG_0330.MOV; BOS1.pdf; BOS2.pdf

Supervisor Horn: As you can see from the attachments, the agenda materials for the board's meeting on June 26, 2012, are not available on the county's website. Cory Briggs


Exhibit “E”

1

Cory Briggs

From: Cory BriggsSent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:32 AMTo: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';

'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'

Cc: '[email protected]'Subject: Request to Cure Brown Act Violations on June 26, 2012Attachments: 2012-06-26_Cure_Request.pdf

Importance: High

JournalPM: J

Dear Supervisors: The attached letter concerning today's meeting of the Board of Supervisors is urgent and should be reviewed before the meeting. As noted in the letter, proceeding with today's meeting could expose you to criminal prosection. Thank you. Cory Briggs Cory J. Briggs Briggs Law Corporation San Diego County: 814 Morena Boulevard, Suite 107, San Diego, CA 92110 Inland Empire: 99 East "C" Street, Suite 111, Upland, CA 91786 Telephone: 619-221-9280 (San Diego), 909-949-7115 (Inland Empire) Facsimile: 619-515-6410 (San Diego), 909-949-7121 (Inland Empire) E-mail: [email protected] Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail, and print double-sided whenever possible. Important Notice: This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is legally privileged. If you are not an addressee or the person responsible for delivering this message to the addressee(s), you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, or copying this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please immediately notify me by replying to this message and then delete the original message and your reply immediately thereafter. Thank you very much. Internal Revenue Service Circular 230 Disclosure: Nothing in this message is intended or written by Briggs Law Corporation (including its attorneys and staff) to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this message.

Be Good to the Earth: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle


San Diego Off ice:

814 M orena Boulevard, Suite 107

San Diego, CA 92110

Telephone: 619-497-0021

Facsim ile: 619-515-6410

Inland Em pire Of f ice:

99 East “ C” Street, Suite 111

Upland, CA 91786

Telephone: 909-949-7115

Facsim ile: 909-949-7121

P lease respond to: In land Em pire Off ice BLC File(s) : 1593.11

26 June 2012

Board of Supervisors Via E-Mail OnlyCounty of San Diegoc/o Board Clerk Thomas Pastuszka Via Facsimile Only to 619-531-60981600 Pacific HighwaySan Diego, CA 92101

Re: Request to Cure Violation of Ralph M. Brown Act

Dear Board of Supervisors:

On behalf of my client, San Diegans for Open Government, I am writing to request the cureof two separate violations of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.)being committed by you at your meeting on June 26, 2012.

First, the entire regular meeting violates Government Code Section 54954.2(a)(1) becausethe agenda was not posted on your Internet website for the entire 72-hour period preceding themeeting. In particular, numerous members of the public attempted to review your agenda onMonday, June 25, 2012--using the “Board of Supervisors Agenda” website--and were unable to findany agenda information for today’s meeting. The California Attorney General has construed theBrown Act’s 72-hour posting provision as requiring the agenda’s posting for the entire 72-hourperiod; and has approved an electronic kiosk providing agenda information as long as it is availableto the public 24 hours per day, seven days per week. The Legislature’s recent addition of Internetweb access to Section 54954.2(a)(1) will be held to the same standard because so many people thesedays rely on your website as their primary means of obtaining information about your regularmeetings. The statement in Rule 2 of the Board of Supervisors Rules of Procedure that “[t]heprimary means of distribution [of your agenda] shall be through the County Internet Web Site”serves to bolster my client’s position. Because of this Brown Act violation, you may not take anyaction at today’s meeting; and any action you do take must be immediately rescinded. (I e-mailedproof of the agenda’s unavailability to Supervisor Horn yesterday.)

Second, I have been informed by members of the public that you will not allow any publiccomment on item 23 on today’s agenda because public hearings have already taken place on theitem’s subject matter. Such curtailment of public comment might have been lawful had it not beenfor the submission of a last-minute Change Letter by Supervisor Roberts after you closed the publichearings for oral testimony on June 12, 2012. Government Code Section 54954.3(a) prohibits thecurtailment of public comment when “the item has been substantially changed” after its previousconsideration. The Change Letter represents a “substantial change” to the subject matter of thepublic hearings, and thus the public must be given an opportunity to comment on the subject matterof item 23. However, that opportunity may not lawfully be given today because members of the

Board of Supervisors June 26, 2012County of San Diego Page 2


public who were informed that they would not be allowed to comment may have been dissuadedfrom appearing today, believing that such efforts would be futile. The subject matter of item 23 musttherefore be brought back for your consideration at a future date, with an agenda that is accessibleto all for the full 72-hour period beforehand and that does not illegally curtail public comment.Again, because of this Brown Act violation, you may not take any action at today’s meeting; and anyaction you do take must be immediately rescinded.

Under the Brown Act, these violation must be cured not more than 30 days after receipt ofthis letter. Please notify me in writing as soon as possible to let me know whether the violation willbe cured and, if so, when the cure will take place. (Note, however, that my client may sue beforereceiving your response.)

Lastly, please note that each of you may be criminally prosecuted under Government CodeSection 54959 for your participation in today’s meeting if you intend to deprive the public ofinformation that you have reason to know the public is entitled to have. This letter provides you withample reason to know that proceeding with today’s meeting will deprive the public of informationto which it is entitled.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,


Cory J. Briggs

cc: District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis (via e-mail only)


Exhibit “F”

1

Cory Briggs

From: Cory BriggsSent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:20 PMTo: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';

'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'

Cc: '[email protected]'Subject: Second Request to Cure Brown Act Violations on June 26, 2012Attachments: 2012-06-26_Cure_Request_Additional_Grounds_2012-06-27.pdf; IMG_0330.mov; BOS1.pdf;

BOS2.pdf

JournalPM: J

Dear Supervisors: The attached letter concerning yesterday's meeting of the Board of Supervisors is urgent and should be reviewed immediately, especially given your potential criminal and civil liability. And for those of you who believe that yesterday's agenda was accessible on the "Board of Supervisors Agenda" website, please see the attached video and pictures showing that the agenda was not available. (These are the ones that Supervisor Horn ignored even though I sent them to him on Monday.) Thank you. Cory Briggs Cory J. Briggs Briggs Law Corporation San Diego County: 814 Morena Boulevard, Suite 107, San Diego, CA 92110 Inland Empire: 99 East "C" Street, Suite 111, Upland, CA 91786 Telephone: 619-221-9280 (San Diego), 909-949-7115 (Inland Empire) Facsimile: 619-515-6410 (San Diego), 909-949-7121 (Inland Empire) E-mail: [email protected] Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail, and print double-sided whenever possible. Important Notice: This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is legally privileged. If you are not an addressee or the person responsible for delivering this message to the addressee(s), you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, or copying this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please immediately notify me by replying to this message and then delete the original message and your reply immediately thereafter. Thank you very much. Internal Revenue Service Circular 230 Disclosure: Nothing in this message is intended or written by Briggs Law Corporation (including its attorneys and staff) to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this message.



San Diego Off ice:

814 M orena Boulevard, Suite 107

San Diego, CA 92110

Telephone: 619-497-0021

Facsim ile: 619-515-6410

Inland Em pire Of f ice:

99 East “ C” Street, Suite 111

Upland, CA 91786

Telephone: 909-949-7115

Facsim ile: 909-949-7121

P lease respond to: In land Em pire Off ice BLC File(s) : 1593.11

27 June 2012

Board of Supervisors Via E-Mail OnlyCounty of San Diegoc/o Board Clerk Thomas Pastuszka Via Facsimile Only to 619-531-60981600 Pacific HighwaySan Diego, CA 92101

Re: Request to Cure Multiple Violations of Ralph M. Brown Act

Dear Board of Supervisors:

On behalf of my client, San Diegans for Open Government, I am writing to request the cureof multiple violations of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.)committed by you at your meeting on June 26, 2012. Two of the violations--under GovernmentCode Sections 54954.2(a)(1) and 54954.3--were described in my letter to you yesterday, and myclient re-asserts them. The third violation concerns yesterday’s illegal closed session dealing withthe threat of potential litigation relating (at least partly) to item 23 on yesterday’s agenda; and withwhat was described as “item 30,” which was not on yesterday’s agenda.

Government Code Section 54953(a) provides that “[a]ll meetings of the legislative body shallbe open and public, and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting of the legislative bodyof a local agency, except as otherwise provided in [the Brown Act].” Section 54954.5 prescribes thedescription required on agendas when a closed session is contemplated. Section 54956.9(c) requiresevery legislative body, before going into closed session on any item, to state on its agenda or topublic announce the subdivision of Section 54956.9 that authorizes the closed session. Morepointedly, Section 54962 prohibits any closed session by any legislative body of a local agencyexcept as “expressly authorized” by the Brown Act.

You did not satisfy the exceptions authorizing a closed session yesterday. This morning Iobtained a copy of your agenda for yesterday’s meeting--I got it from another source, as it still is notaccessible on your “Board of Supervisors Agenda” website--and I watched the video archive ofyesterday’s meeting. There is no closed session identified for any matter on the agenda (which listsonly 27 items), and at no time during the meeting did anyone publicly announce the subdivision ofGovernment Code Section 54956.9 authorizing yesterday’s closed session. Consequently, youviolated Section 54953 by going into closed session.

As I informed you yesterday, these Brown Act violation must be cured not more than 30 daysafter receipt of this letter. Please notify me in writing as soon as possible to let me know whetherthe violation will be cured and, if so, when the cure will take place.

Board of Supervisors June 27, 2012County of San Diego Page 2


Unless you cure yesterday’s violations before June 30, 2012, my client will file suit on July2, 2012, to have the action you took yesterday on item 23--indeed, all action you took yesterday--declared null and void. The action you took on item 23 was necessary under Government CodeSection 29064 in order to preserve the County’s authority to spend public funds until the final budgetis adopted. Because that action is null and void, any public funds that the County spends prior toadopting a final budget will be illegal expenditures. Furthermore, each of you could be heldpersonally liable for the illegal expenditure of funds prior to adoption of a final budget if you do notcure yesterday’s violations in a timely manner. See Stanson v. Mott, 17 Cal. 3d 206 (1976); Minesv. Del Valle, 201 Cal. 273 (1927).

Please give this important matter the prompt attention it deserves.

Sincerely,


Cory J. Briggs

cc: District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis (via e-mail only)


Exhibit “G”

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORSSTATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS

FISCAL YEAR 2012 - 2013 BUDGET HEARINGSMEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

JUNE 11, 2012 - JUNE 20, 2012

JUNE 11, 2012: The Budget Hearings were called to order at 9:00 a.m.

Present: Supervisors Ron Roberts, Chairman; Greg Cox, Vice-Chairman; Dianne Jacob; Pam Slater-Price; Bill Horn; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.

The following documents are on file with the Clerk of the Board:

The Chief Administrative Officer’s Proposed Operational Plan – Fiscal Years 2012-2013 & 2013-2014

Community Enhancement Applications

Community Enhancement Binder prepared by the Office of Financial Planning

1BH.ACTION/REFERRALS:The Board received oral testimony requesting Community Enhancement funding from the following organizations on Monday, June 11, 2012:

A Reason to Survive, Inc.Accessible San DiegoActors Alliance of San DiegoAgua Hedionda Lagoon FoundationAguinaldo FoundationAlpine Chamber of CommerceAlpine Historical and Conservation Society Alpine Woman's Club America’s Finest City Dixieland Jazz SocietyAmerican Youth Hostels, Inc. San Diego Council (Hostelling International USA, San

Diego Council)Antique Gas & Steam Engine MuseumAnza Borrego Desert Natural History Association (Borrego Desert Nature Center) Anza Borrego Foundation

June 11 - June 20, 2012 1

Art of ElanAsian Story Theater Batiquitos Lagoon Foundation BID Foundation Bonita Business & Professional Association, IncBonita Historical Society (Bonita Museum & Cultural Center)Bonita Optimist Club (Bonitafest Melodrama Project)Bonsall Chamber of CommerceBoosters of Old Town San Diego State Historic Park (BOOT)Borrego Springs Chamber of CommerceBusiness Improvement District CouncilCalifornia Ballet Association, Inc. (California Ballet Company)California Center for the Arts Escondido California State Games Camarada, Inc.Capoeira InstituteCardiff Chamber of CommerceCarlsbad Musical FestivalCasa Familiar, IncCenter for Community SolutionsCentral Commercial District Revitalization CorporationChicano Federation of San DiegoChildren’s Museum of San DiegoCHIRP for Garden Wildlife, Inc.Christmas Circle Community ParkChula Vista Chamber of CommerceCity Ballet, Inc. Civic Youth OrchestraClassics for Kids, Inc. College Area Economic Development Corporation (College Area Business District)College of BorregoCommittee of One HundredCONNECT FoundationCoronado Community Theatre, Inc. (Coronado Playhouse)Coronado Historical Association (Coronado Museum of History and Art)Cortez Racing AssociationCygnet TheatreDel Mar Regional Chamber of Commerce (San Diego Coastal Chamber of Commerce)Del Mar Village AssociationDiversionary Theatre Productions, Inc. Downtown Business Association of Escondido

June 11 - June 20, 2012 2

Downtown Encinitas Main Street AssociationDowntown San Diego PartnershipEarth Discovery InstituteEast County Economic Development Council El Cajon Boulevard Business Improvement Associations, Inc. (El Cajon Business Improvement District)El Cajon Historical SocietyEl Cajon Valley Mother Goose Parade AssociationElite DVBE Network (Elite SDVOB)Encinitas Chamber of CommerceEncinitas Historical SocietyEscondido Arts Partnership (Escondido Municipal Gallery)Escondido Children’s Museum, Inc.Escondido History CenterEveoke Dance Theatre Fallbrook Art Association Fallbrook Center for the Arts, Inc.Fallbrook Food Pantry Fallbrook Land Conservancy FoundationFallbrook Music SocietyFinest City Performing Arts, IncFirefighters Advisory Council to the Burn Institute Flying Leatherneck Historical Foundation Food & Beverage Association of San Diego County Fourth District Seniors Resource Center (George Stevens Senior Center)Friends of San Diego Wildlife Refuges, Inc. (Tijuana Estuary Visitor Center)Friends of Scott FoundationFriends of the Rancho Buena Vista AdobeGaslamp Quarter Association, Inc.Gaslamp Quarter Historical FoundationGirl Scouts San Diego-Imperial Council, IncGreater San Diego Chamber (San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce)Heritage of the Americas Museum, Inc.Hillcrest Business Improvement Association (Hillcrest Association)Historic Highway 80 Corporation Historic Old Town Community Foundation

The Board recessed at 11:30 a.m., and reconvened at 2:00 p.m.


I Love A Clean San Diego

June 11 - June 20, 2012 3

Italian American Art and Cultural Association of San DiegoJapanese Friendship Garden Society of San Diego Julian 4th of July Parade, Inc.Julian Arts GuildJulian Chamber of Commerce Julian Historical Society Julian Merchants AssociationJulian Pioneer Museum Justice Overcoming Boundaries in San Diego CountyKalusugan Community Services Korean American Senior Association of San Diego CountyLa Jolla Chapter, SPEBSQSA, IncLa Jolla Music Society La Jolla Symphony & Chorus Association Lakeside Chamber of Commerce Lakeside Historical Society (Lakeside History Center)Lamb's Players Theatre Lemon Grove Historical Society (Parsonage Museum/H. Lee House Ctr)Leucadia-Encinitas Highway 101 Main Street AssociationLibrary Association of La Jolla (Athenaeum Music & Arts Library)Lincoln Prep Boys Basketball FoundationLinda Vista Multicultural Fair, Inc. Lux Art InstituteMaine Avenue Revitalization AssociationMainly Mozart, Inc. MCRD Museum Historical SocietyMedia Arts Center San Diego (San Diego Latino Film Festival)Mexicayotl Indio Cultural CenterMingei International, Inc. (Mingei International Museum)

Mission Hills Business Improvement District Mission Trails Regional Park Foundation, IncMojalet Dance CollectiveMo'olelo Performing Arts Company Motor Transport Museum Mountain Empire Historical Society (Gaskill Bros’' Stone Store Museum)Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego Museum of Photographic Arts North Coast Repertory TheaterNorth Park Historical Society

June 11 - June 20, 2012 4

North Park Organization of Businesses, Inc. (North Park Main Street)NTC Foundation Ocean Beach Community Development CorporationOcean Beach Community Foundation, Inc.Ocean Beach Historical SocietyOcean Beach Merchant's Association (Ocean Beach Mainstreet Association)Ocean Beach Town Council, IncOceanside CERTOceanside Chamber of Commerce (California Welcome Center Oceanside)Oceanside Museum of ArtOlaf Wieghorst Museum FoundationOld Globe TheatreOld Town San Diego Chamber of CommerceOnstage Playhouse Otay Mesa Chamber of Commerce Outside the LensPagasa-Tumainisha-Esperanza-Hope, IncParade Band Foundation IncPASACAT, Inc. (Philippine Performing Arts Company)Pauma Valley Community AssociationPeninsula Chamber of CommercePlaywrights Project Point Loma Nazarene UniversityPoint Loma Summer ConcertsPoway Center for the Performing Arts FoundationPoway Performing Arts Company (POWPAC, Poway's Community Theatre)Prime Motivation Project WildlifeQuail Botanical Gardens Foundation Quilt San Diego (Quilt Visions/Visions Art Quilt Gallery)Ramona Chamber of Commerce Ramona Pioneer Historical Society Rancho Santa Fe Historical SocietyRancho de los Penasquitos Town CouncilReuben H. Fleet Science CenterRiding Emphasizing Individual Needs & Strengths (REINS Therapeutic)Samahan Filipino American Performing Arts and Education Center, Inc. (Philippine Dance Company)San Diego Alliance For Asian Pacific Islander Americans, Inc.San Diego Archaeological CenterSan Diego Armed Services YMCA San Diego Asian Film FoundationSan Diego Audubon SocietySan Diego Automotive Museum San Diego Ballet San Diego Bowl Game Association (Pacific Life Holiday Bowl)

June 11 - June 20, 2012 5

San Diego Center for Jewish Culture

The Board recessed Budget Hearings at 4:30 p.m.

The Board reconvened at 9:00 a.m., June 12, 2012.


The Board received oral testimony requesting Community Enhancement funding from the following organizations on Tuesday, June 12, 2012:

San Diego Chamber Orchestra (Orchestra Nova San Diego)San Diego Children's Choir San Diego Civic Youth BalletSan Diego CoastkeeperSan Diego Convention & Visitors BureauSan Diego County Bicycle CoalitionSan Diego Dance Theater San Diego East Visitors BureauSan Diego Filipino-American Humanitarian Foundation, Inc.San Diego Film Commission San Diego Hall of Champions, Inc.San Diego Historical SocietySan Diego Junior Theatre San Diego Master Chorale San Diego Museum CouncilSan Diego Museum of Art San Diego Museum of ManSan Diego North Chamber of Commerce San Diego North Economic Development Council (North County Economic

Development Council)San Diego Opera Association San Diego Performing Arts League (SDPAL)San Diego Second Chance ProgramSan Diego Shakespeare Society, Inc. San Diego Society of Natural History (San Diego Natural History Museum)San Diego Sports Commission San Diego Symphony Orchestra Association San Diego Synergy Arts NetworkSan Diego Youth Symphony and Conservatory San Dieguito Heritage Museum, Inc.

June 11 - June 20, 2012 6

San Dieguito River Valley JPA (San Dieguito River Park)San Dieguito River Valley Land ConservancySan Elijo Lagoon ConservancySantee Historical Society Save Our Heritage OrganisationShelter Care Providers of San Diego, IncSherman Heights Community CenterSolana Beach Chamber of CommerceSouth County Economic Development Council Spreckles Organ SocietySpring Valley Chamber of Commerce Spring Valley Historical SocietySpringfest, IncSt. Madeleine Sophie’s Training Center Starlings Volleyball Clubs, USATheatre & Arts Foundation of San Diego County (La Jolla Playhouse)Third Avenue Village AssociationTierrasanta Community CouncilTravelers Aid Society of San Diego, Inc. United Italian American Association Unlimited Jazz Dance ProductionsValley Center Chamber of CommerceValley Center Community Recreation CenterValley Center Pageant Association (Miss Valley Center Pageant)Valley Center Parks and Recreation District (Valley Center Community Services

DistrictValley Center Womens ClubVisit Oceanside, Inc.Vista Historical Society, Inc.Vista Town Center Association, Inc. (Vista Village Business Association)Vista Townsite Community PartnershipVoices for Children, Inc.WalkSanDiegoWestwind Brass, IncWILDCOASTWords AliveWorld Trade Center San DiegoWrite Out LoudYoung Audiences of San Diego Zeta Sigma Lambda Foundation, Inc

The Board recessed Budget Hearings at 11:33 a.m., to reconvene at 2:00 p.m. for oral public testimony to address all other areas of the Budget.

June 11 - June 20, 2012 7

JUNE 12, 2012: AFTERNOON SESSION- The Budget Hearings were called to order at 2:02 p.m.Present: Supervisors Ron Roberts, Chairman; Greg Cox, Vice-Chairman; Dianne Jacob; Pam Slater-Price; Bill Horn; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.

2BHPUBLIC TESTIMONY/ACTION/REFERRALS:

The Board convened to receive oral public testimony on other areas of the Budget.

ACTION:

There being no requests for oral public testimony on the Budget, the Board recessed the Budget Hearings at 2:05 p.m. closing the oral public testimony portion of the Budget Hearings. From June 12, 2012 through the close of Budget Hearings at 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 20, 2012, members of the public may provide written testimony on the budget to the Clerk of the Board to be received no later than 5:00 p.m., June 20, 2012. Copies of submitted materials will be provided by the Clerk of the Board to the Board of Supervisors, Chief Administrative Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, upon receipt, and made a part of the record by the Clerk, when the hearings formally close at 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 20, 2012.

The Clerk of the Board received the following items prior to the close of Budget Hearings:

• Chief Administrative Officer Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter

• Community Enhancement Allocations for Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

• Change Letter Request from Chairman Ron Roberts, District 4

Written public testimony was received by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors from:

• Alcohol and Drug Services Advisory Board

• Sandy Smith regarding the Department of Planning and Land Use and the Department of Public Works

At 5:01 p.m., Wednesday, June 20, 2012, the Clerk of the Board officially closed the Budget Hearings.

THOMAS J. PASTUSZKAClerk of the Board of Supervisors

County of San Diego, State of California

June 11 - June 20, 2012 8

Notes by: Vizcarra

June 11 - June 20, 2012 9


Exhibit “H”

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AGENDA ITEM

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

GREG COX First District

DIANNE JACOB

Second District

PAM SLATER-PRICE Third District

RON ROBERTS Fourth District

BILL HORN Fifth District

Documentum Version 3.1

DATE: June 20, 2012 – to be heard by the Board of Supervisors

on June 26, 2012

TO: Board of Supervisors

SUBJECT: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER PROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14 CHANGE LETTER (DISTRICT: ALL)

SUMMARY: Overview On May 8, 2012 ( 14), the Board of Supervisors received the Chief Administrative

Officer Proposed Operational Plan Fiscal Years 2012-13 and 2013-14 (CAO Proposed Operational Plan) and set the dates and times for public hearings and deliberations. The proposed amendments to the CAO Proposed Operational Plan are based on updated expenditure and revenue information and recent Board actions. T oday’s action requests the Board approve the CAO Proposed Operational Plan and the Change Letter requests at the conclusion of budget deliberations. Budget deliberations are scheduled to commence on June 26, 2012. A resolution of adoption is expected to be before the Board on August 7, 2012.

Recommendation(s) CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 29064, a pprove the Chief Administrative Officer Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2012-13 on or before June 30, 2012, for the purpose of having the authority to spend until the budget is adopted.

2. Accept the appropriation, funding and staffing changes to the Chief Administrative

Officer Proposed Operational Plan Fiscal Years 2012-13 and 2013-14 as shown in the attached schedules for consideration during budget deliberations.

3. Following budget deliberations and approval of the Chief Administrative Officer

Proposed Operational Plan Fiscal Years 2012-13 and 2013-14, authorize the Chief Financial Officer to make adjustments as necessary between object accounts with no increases in total departmental appropriations in order to clarify all budget items for the final Operational Plan and budget resolution.

SUBJECT: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER PROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLAN

FISCAL YEARS 2012-13 AND 2013-14 CHANGE LETTER (DISTRICT: ALL)

- 2 -

Fiscal Impact The proposed changes to the CAO Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Years 2012-13

and 2013-14, include for Fiscal Year 2012-13 appropriation increases of $29.1 million and an increase of 52.25 staff years. C hanges for Fiscal Year 2013-14 include appropriation increases of $33.9 million and an increase of 159.25 staff years. The total revised CAO Proposed Operational Plan is $4.80 billion for Fiscal Year 2012-13 and $4.65 billion for Fiscal Year 2013-14. The total revised staff years are 16,010.75 in Fiscal Year 2012-13 and 16,114.75 in Fiscal Year 2013-14. The Fiscal Year 2012-13 proposed increases in appropriations are supported by $4.0 million in fund balance and $25.1 million in program revenues. The Fiscal Year 2013-14 proposed increases in appropriations are supported by $0.7 million in fund balance and $33.2 million in program revenues.

Business Impact Statement The changes to the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include the purchase of goods and

services from the private sector.

Advisory Board Statement Individual advisory boards will review and may comment separately on portions of the

CAO Proposed Operational Plan.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this Change Letter is to update the CAO Proposed Operational Plan based on information that became available after that document was presented to the Board on M ay 8, 2012. Pursuant to Government Code Section 29064, a proposed budget must be approved by the Board by June 30, 2012, for the purpose of having authority to spend until the budget is adopted. A resolution of adoption is expected to be before the Board on August 7, 2012. The recommended changes to the CAO Proposed Operational Plan are summarized by group below. PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP The recommended changes for the Public Safety Group (PSG) increase the CAO Proposed Operational Plan by $22.4 million and increase by 54.00 staff years in Fiscal Year 2012-13. The total revised CAO Proposed Operational Plan for PSG for Fiscal Year 2012-13 is $1.5 billion and 7,120.00 staff years. In Fiscal Year 2013-14, recommended changes increase appropriations by $33.5 million to $1.5 billion and increase staff years by 161.00 to 7,228.00 staff years. Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include: $16.2 million increase in the Probation Department as a result of adding staff years and treatment costs associated with the implementation of Assembly Bill (AB) 109, Public Safety Realignment (2011) (Public Safety Realignment); which includes $6.0 million in contracted



- 3 -

mental health and substance abuse treatment services to offenders provided by the Health and Human Services Agency; $3.7 million increase in the Sheriff’s Department as a result of adding staff years, equipment, services and supplies and fixed assets associated with the implementation of Public Safety Realignment; $1.3 million decrease in the Sheriff’s Department for Homeland Security Grants due to revised spending estimates received subsequent to the submission of the CAO Proposed Operational Plan; $0.7 million increase in the Sheriff’s Department for contract costs associated with the electronic monitoring of offenders supervised by the Sheriff’s County Parole and Alternate Custody Unit; and a $1.2 million increase in the Probation Department as a result of adding staff years and contracted services for the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act. In Fiscal Year 2013-14, proposed changes include a $33.5 m illion increase in the Sheriff’s Department ($16.3 million) and in the Probation Department ($17.2 million) primarily due to adding staff years, equipment, services and supplies and fixed assets associated with the implementation of Public Safety Realignment. Proposed staffing changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include: an increase of 20.00 staff years in the Sheriff’s Department for the East Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility due to the implementation of Public Safety Realignment; an increase of 2.00 staff years in the Sheriff’s Department for the North County Transit District; an increase of 2.00 s taff years in the Probation Department to support programs funded by the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act; a decrease of 2.00 staff years in the Probation Department for the Truancy Intervention Program due to a reduction in revenue; and an increase of 32.00 staff years in the Probation Department due to the implementation of Public Safety Realignment. In addition to the proposed increase of 54.00 staff years described above for Fiscal Year 2012-13, an increase of 107.00 staff years is proposed for Fiscal Year 2013-14 for a total of 161.00 staff years. The increase of 107.00 staff years in the Sheriff’s Department is for the East Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility due to the implementation of Public Safety Realignment. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY The recommended changes for the Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA) will result in a net zero change in the CAO Proposed Operational Plan in Fiscal Year 2012-13. Appropriations remain unchanged at $1.9 billion and staff years remain unchanged at 5,306.25. In Fiscal Year 2013-14, total net appropriations remain unchanged at $1.9 bi llion and total staff years remain unchanged at 5,306.25 staff years. Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include: an increase of $6.0 million in Behavioral Health Services as recommended by the Executive Committee of the Community Corrections Partnership to provide contracted mental health and substance abuse treatment services to offenders referred per Public Safety Realignment; offset by an increase of $6.0 million in Expenditure Transfer and Reimbursements for services under Public Safety Realignment through the Probation Department.



- 4 -

LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP The recommended changes for the Land Use and Environment Group (LUEG) increase the CAO Proposed Operational Plan in Fiscal Year 2012-13 by $3.4 million and staff years remain unchanged. The total revised CAO Proposed Operational Plan for LUEG for Fiscal Year 2012-13 is $391.3 million and 1,451.00 staff years. In Fiscal Year 2013-14, recommended changes increase appropriations by $0.2 million to $359.2 million and staff years remain unchanged at 1,451.00 staff years. Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include: an increase of $0.3 m illion in Agriculture, Weights and Measures for increased standardized inspections, labeling and packing requirements and increased coordination with other agencies including the Sheriff’s Department on a gricultural thefts; an increase of $0.54 million in Planning and Land Use for the Continuous Improvement Program to improve land development services and for a training program for the Community Planning Sponsor Groups as approved by the Board of Supervisors; an increase of $0.58 million in Public Works and Parks and Recreation departments due to the award of three grants from the Indian Gaming Local Benefit Committee Grant Dehesa Road and Wildcat Canyon Road Rubberized Asphalt Projects and for increased operational and maintenance costs at Louis Stelzer County Park; and an increase of $0.8 million in the Public Works Road Fund Detailed Work Program for the purchase of right-of- way for the San Vicente Road project. Significant proposed staffing changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include: an increase of 3.00 s taff years in the Agriculture, Weights and Measures department for increased standardization and quality control inspections and for coordination with various agencies including the Sheriff on agricultural theft this is offset by a decrease of 3.00 staff years – one in each department as follows, Environmental Health, Planning and Land Use and Public Works due to the downturn in the economy and reduced workloads. COMMUNITY SERVICES GROUP The recommended changes for the Community Services Group (CSG) increase the CAO Proposed Operational Plan in Fiscal Year 2012-13 by $2.9 million and include a decrease of 1.75 staff years. The total revised CAO Proposed Operational Plan for CSG for Fiscal Year 2012-13 is $305.5 million and 959.00 staff years. In Fiscal Year 2013-14, recommended changes increase appropriations by $0.2 million to $293.1 million and recommended changes include a decrease of 1.75 staff years for a total of 955.00 staff years. Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include: an increase of $2.0 million in appropriations and revenue in Housing and Community Development based on the newly awarded grants from the State Department of Housing and Community Development to assist first-time low-income homebuyers and to provide rental assistance to homeless persons.



- 5 -

Significant proposed staffing changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include the decrease of 1.75 staff years in the County Library. This is a technical adjustment to align prior years’ position deletions. FINANCE AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT GROUP There are no recommended appropriation changes for the Finance and General Government Group (FGG) in the CAO Proposed Operational Plan in Fiscal Year 2012-13 and staff years remain unchanged. The total CAO Proposed Operational Plan for FGG for Fiscal Year 2012-13 is $340.8 million and 1,174.50 staff years. In Fiscal Year 2013-14, total appropriations and staff years remain unchanged at $319.9 million and 1,174.50 respectively. CAPITAL PROGRAM The recommended changes for the Capital Program increase the CAO Proposed Operational Plan in Fiscal Year 2012-13 by $0.36 million. The total revised CAO Proposed Operational Plan for the Capital Program for Fiscal Year 2012-13 is $48.5 million and remains at $12.4 million for Fiscal Year 2013-14. Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include: an increase of $0.12 million for the existing Rainbow Park Improvements project, based on Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to fund improvements to the playground, including rubber safety surfacing, and additional shade trees for the picnic areas; an increase of $0.12 million for the new Mountain Empire (Campo) Community Center Playground Phase II project, based on CDBG Funds, to fund the installation of a picnic pavilion and picnic tables, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible walkways, exercise stations, and other improvements including park benches, barbecues, landscaping and irrigation, and trash receptacles; and an increase of $0.12 million for the new Spring Valley Park LED Lights and Landscaping project, based on C DBG funds, to fund LED lights and landscaping; these improvements will increase security and energy efficiency at the park. FINANCE OTHER The recommended changes for Finance Other increase the CAO Proposed Operational Plan in Fiscal Year 2012-13 by $0.07 million for a total revised CAO Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2012-13 of $313.5 m illion. I n Fiscal Year 2013-14, total appropriations remain unchanged at $273.8 million. Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan Include: an increase of $0.07 million for the San Dieguito River Valley Regional Open Space Park Joint Powers Authority contingent upon t he City of San Diego agreeing to meet participation requirements for Fiscal Year 2013-14. Linkage to the County of San Diego Strategic Plan The CAO Proposed Operational Plan details each Department’s strategic objectives for the next two years and the resources required to achieve them. The three Strategic Initiatives in the



- 7 -

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SHEET REQUIRES FOUR VOTES: [] Yes [X] No WRITTEN DISCLOSURE PER COUNTY CHARTER SECTION 1000.1 REQUIRED [] Yes [X] No

PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOARD ACTIONS: May 18, 2012 ( 14), Chief Administrative Officer Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Years 2012-13 & 2013-14

BOARD POLICIES APPLICABLE: N/A

BOARD POLICY STATEMENTS: N/A

MANDATORY COMPLIANCE: N/A

ORACLE AWARD NUMBER(S) AND CONTRACT AND/OR REQUISITION NUMBER(S): N/A

ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Chief Financial Officer OTHER CONCURRENCE(S): N/A CONTACT PERSON(S): Donald F. Steuer, Chief Financial Officer Ebony Shelton, Director, Office of Financial

Planning Name Name 619-531-5413 619-531-5175 Phone Phone 619-531-5219 619-531-6261 Fax Fax A-5 A-5 Mail Station Mail Station [email protected] [email protected] E-mail E-mail

TABLE OF CONTENTS

County of San Diego CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14 i

Summary of Changes Total Staff Years by Group/Agency .................................................1Total Appropriations by Group/Agency ...........................................1

Public Safety Group Changes Executive Office ...............................................................................6Contribution to the Trial Courts .......................................................6District Attorney ...............................................................................9Sheriff.............................................................................................11Child Support Services ..................................................................16Citizens Law Enforcement Review Board......................................18Office of Emergency Services........................................................20Medical Examiner ..........................................................................22Probation .......................................................................................24Public Defender ............................................................................27San Diego County Fire Authority ...................................................29

Health and Human Services AgencyChanges

Regional Operations ......................................................................33Strategic Planning and Operational Support .................................35Aging & Independence Services ....................................................37Behavioral Health Services ............................................................39Child Welfare Services...................................................................41Public Health Services ...................................................................43Public Administrator/Public Guardian............................................45Administrative Support ..................................................................47

Land Use and Environment GroupChanges

Executive Office .............................................................................50Agriculture, Weights & Measures...................................................53Air Pollution Control District...........................................................55Environmental Health.....................................................................57Farm & Home Advisor....................................................................59Parks and Recreation ....................................................................61Planning and Land Use..................................................................63Public Works .................................................................................65

Community Services Group Changes Executive Office .............................................................................70Animal Services .............................................................................73County Library ...............................................................................75General Services ............................................................................77Housing and Community Development .........................................79Purchasing and Contracting ..........................................................81County of San Diego Redevelopment Agency and SuccessorAgency ...........................................................................................83County Successor Agency.............................................................84Registrar of Voters .........................................................................85

Table of Contents

ii County of San DiegoCAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Finance and General GovernmentGroup Changes

Executive Office .............................................................................87Board of Supervisors .....................................................................91Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk ..................................................93Treasurer-Tax Collector .................................................................95Chief Administrative Office ............................................................97Auditor and Controller....................................................................99County Technology Office ...........................................................101Civil Service Commission ............................................................103Clerk of the Board of Supervisors................................................105County Counsel ...........................................................................107San Diego County Grand Jury .....................................................109Human Resources........................................................................110County Communications Office...................................................112

Capital Program Changes Capital Program Summary...........................................................115Capital Outlay Fund .....................................................................116Justice Facility Construction Fund...............................................117Multiple Species Conservation Program Fund ............................117Edgemoor Development Fund .....................................................117

Finance Other Changes Finance Other Summary.............................................................. 119Countywide General Expenses....................................................119

Appendix: Changes by Fund General Fund................................................................................121Road Fund ...................................................................................122County Library..............................................................................123Sheriff's Asset Forfeiture Program...............................................124Sheriff's Inmate Welfare...............................................................125PRD 1001 Capra Way ..................................................................125PRD 1007 Tumble Creek .............................................................126Capital Outlay Fund .....................................................................126Purchasing Internal Service Fund ................................................127

1Summary of Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Summary of Changes

Total Staff Years by Group/Agency

Staff years total 16,010.75 in the revised Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2012-13 and 16,114.75 for Fiscal Year2013-14. For Fiscal Year 2012-13, this is an increase of 52.25 staff years or 0.3% from the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO)Proposed Operational Plan for an increase of 323.50 staff years or 2.1% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Adopted OperationalPlan.

Total Appropriations by Group/Agency

Appropriations total $4.80 billion in the revised Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2012-13 and $4.65 billion forFiscal Year 2013-14. For Fiscal Year 2012-13, this is an increase of $29.1 million or 0.6% from the CAO ProposedOperational Plan for a decrease of $62.6 million or -1.3% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Adopted Budget.

Proposed changes are discussed in detail in the department sections following the Summary for each of the Groups - PublicSafety Group (PSG), Health and Human Services Agency (HHSA), Land Use and Environment Group (LUEG), CommunityServices Group (CSG), Finance and General Government Group (FGG) – as well as for the Capital Program and the FinanceOther program.

2

Summary of Changes

Summary of ChangesCAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Total Appropriations by Group/Agency

(In Millions)

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget

Fiscal Year 2012-13 Change

Fiscal Year 2012-13 Revised Budget

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Public Safety Group $ 1,446.1 $ 22.4 $ 1,468.5 $ 1,436.6 $ 33.5 $ 1,470.2

Health and Human Services Agency

1,928.9 0.0 1,928.9 1,921.4 0.0 1,921.4

Land Use and Environment Group

387.9 3.4 391.3 359.0 0.2 359.2

Community Services Group

302.7 2.9 305.5 293.0 0.2 293.1

Finance and General Government Group

340.8 0.0 340.8 319.9 0.0 319.9

Capital Program 48.1 0.4 48.5 12.4 0.0 12.4

Finance Other 313.4 0.1 313.5 273.8 0.0 273.8

Total $ 4,768.0 $ 29.1 $ 4,797.0 $ 4,616.1 $ 33.9 $ 4,650.0

Total Appropriations by Category of Expenditure

(In Millions)

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Salaries & Benefits $ 1,691.3 $ 6.0 $ 1,697.3 $ 1,745.6 $ 15.8 $ 1,761.4

Services & Supplies 1,855.6 22.9 1,878.5 1,741.8 23.1 1,764.8

Other Charges 734.1 2.4 736.4 726.0 0.4 726.4

Capital Assets/Land Acquisition

47.0 0.4 47.3 10.1 0.0 10.1

Capital Assets Equipment

21.6 3.1 24.8 17.0 0.0 17.0

Expenditure Transfer & Reimbursements

(23.6) (6.1) (29.7) (23.7) (6.1) (29.9)

Contingency Reserves 22.1 0.0 22.1 22.1 0.0 22.1

Fund Balance Component Increases

13.7 0.0 13.7 0.4 0.0 0.4

Operating Transfers Out

375.9 0.4 376.4 352.7 0.7 353.4

Management Reserves 30.3 0.0 30.3 24.3 0.0 24.3

Total $ 4,768.0 $ 29.1 $ 4,797.0 $ 4,616.1 $ 33.9 $ 4,650.0

Summary of Changes

3Summary of Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Total Staffing by Group/Agency (staff years)

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Public Safety Group 7,066.00 54.00 7,120.00 7,067.00 161.00 7,228.00

Health and Human Services Agency

5,306.25 0.00 5,306.25 5,306.25 0.00 5,306.25

Land Use and Environment Group

1,451.00 0.00 1,451.00 1,451.00 0.00 1,451.00

Community Services Group

960.75 (1.75) 959.00 956.75 (1.75) 955.00

Finance and General Government Group

1,174.50 0.00 1,174.50 1,174.50 0.00 1,174.50

Total 15,958.50 52.25 16,010.75 15,955.50 159.25 16,114.75

Total Funding by Source

(In Millions)

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



State Aid $ 1,341.2 $ 25.5 $ 1,366.7 $ 1,348.4 $ 34.4 $ 1,382.8

Federal & Other Governmental Aid

981.2 1.0 982.2 947.1 0.2 947.4

Use of Money & Property, Misc., & Other Revenues

440.9 0.7 441.6 399.5 0.8 400.2

Charges for Services, Fees & Fines

875.4 (2.2) 873.2 862.1 (2.3) 859.8

Property & Other Taxes

938.1 0.2 938.3 945.3 0.2 945.4

Fund Balance Component Decreases

0.5 0.0 0.5 14.2 0.0 14.2

Use of Fund Balance 190.5 4.0 194.5 99.5 0.7 100.2

Total $ 4,768.0 $ 29.1 $ 4,797.0 $ 4,616.1 $ 33.9 $ 4,650.0

5Public Safety Group Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Public Safety Group Changes

Public Safety Group Summary

Staffing by Department

The Public Safety Group staffing level in the revised Proposed Operational Plan is 7,120.00 staff years for Fiscal Year 2012-13 and 7,228.00 for Fiscal Year 2013-14. This is an increase of 54.00 staff years or 0.76% from the CAO ProposedOperational Plan and a proposed increase of 149.00 staff years or 2.10% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Adopted OperationalPlan.

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed staffing changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:The increase of 32.00 staff years in the Probation Department due to the implementation of Assembly Bill (AB) 109,Public Safety Realignment (2011); The increase of 20.00 staff years in the Sheriff’s Department for the East Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility dueto the implementation of Public Safety Realignment;The increase of 2.00 staff years in the Sheriff’s Department for the North County Transit District; The increase of 2.00 staff years in the Probation Department to support programs funded by the Juvenile JusticeCrime Prevention Act;The decrease of 2.00 staff years in the Probation Department for the Truancy Intervention Program due to a reductionin revenue.

Fiscal Year 2013-14 The increase of 127.00 staff years in the Sheriff’s Department for the East Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facilitydue to the implementation of Public Safety Realignment as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13;The increase of 32.00 staff years in the Probation Department due to the implementation of Public Safety Realignmentas described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13; The increase of 2.00 staff years in the Sheriff’s Department for the North County Transit District as described above inFiscal Year 2012-13;The increase of 2.00 staff years in the Probation Department to support programs funded by the Juvenile JusticeCrime Prevention Act as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13;The decrease of 2.00 staff years in the Probation Department for the Truancy Intervention Program due to a reductionin revenue as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

6


Public Safety Group ChangesCAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Expenditures by Department

The Public Safety Group appropriations in the revised Proposed Operational Plan are $1.5 billion for Fiscal Year 2012-13and $1.5 billion for Fiscal Year 2013-14. This is an increase of $22.4 million or 1.5% in Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAOProposed Operational Plan, for a proposed increase of $58.2 million or 4.4% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 AdoptedOperational Plan.

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:$16.2 million increase in the Probation Department as a result of adding staff years and treatment costs associatedwith the implementation of Public Safety Realignment.$3.7 million increase in the Sheriff’s Department as a result adding staff years, equipment, services and supplies andfixed assets associated with the implementation of Public Safety Realignment. $1.3 million decrease in the Sheriff’s Department for Homeland Security Grants due to revised spending estimatesreceived subsequent to the submission of the CAO Proposed Operational Plan. $1.2 million increase in the Probation Department as a result of adding staff years and contracted services for theJuvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act.$0.7 million increase in the Sheriff’s Department for contract costs associated with the electronic monitoring ofoffenders supervised by the Sheriff’s County Parole and Alternate Custody unit.$0.6 million in the Sheriff’s Department to rebudget funds for the Port Security Grant. $0.3 million in the Sheriff’s Department to rebudget funds for equipment to outfit the new Rancho San Diego station.

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2013-14 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:$16.2 million increase in the Probation Department as a result of adding staff years and treatment costs associatedwith the implementation of Public Safety Realignment as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.$13.5 million in the Sheriff’s Department as a result adding staff years, equipment, services and supplies and fixedassets associated with the implementation of Public Safety Realignment as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.$1.2 million increase in the Probation Department as a result of adding staff years and contracted services for theJuvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.$0.8 million in the Sheriff’s Department for the purchase of transportation equipment supporting the East Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility.$0.7 million increase in the Sheriff’s Department for contract costs associated with the electronic monitoring ofoffenders supervised by the Sheriff’s County Parole and Alternate Custody unit as described above in Fiscal Year2012-13.

Executive Office

No changes from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan.

Contribution to the Trial Courts





Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Public Safety Executive Office

11.00 0.00 11.00 11.00 0.00 11.00

District Attorney 978.00 0.00 978.00 978.00 0.00 978.00

Sheriff 3,874.00 22.00 3,896.00 3,875.00 129.00 4,004.00

Child Support Services 472.00 0.00 472.00 472.00 0.00 472.00

Citizens' Law Enforcement Review Board

4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00

Office of Emergency Services

17.00 0.00 17.00 17.00 0.00 17.00

Medical Examiner 52.00 0.00 52.00 52.00 0.00 52.00

Probation 1,299.00 32.00 1,331.00 1,299.00 32.00 1,331.00

Public Defender 346.00 0.00 346.00 346.00 0.00 346.00

San Diego County Fire Authority

13.00 0.00 13.00 13.00 0.00 13.00

Total 7,066.00 54.00 7,120.00 7,067.00 161.00 7,228.00


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 233,816,846 $ 0 $ 233,816,846 $ 234,840,368 $ 0 $ 234,840,368

District Attorney 154,680,088 0 154,680,088 154,713,053 0 154,713,053

Sheriff 629,056,142 5,200,412 634,256,554 625,304,879 16,327,248 641,632,127

Child Support Services 50,956,406 0 50,956,406 52,843,995 0 52,843,995

Citizens' Law Enforcement Review Board

588,111 0 588,111 601,799 0 601,799


9,180,674 0 9,180,674 5,392,696 0 5,392,696

Medical Examiner 8,951,213 0 8,951,213 9,199,329 0 9,199,329

Probation 189,893,163 17,216,426 207,109,589 191,569,603 17,216,426 208,786,029

Public Defender 72,757,375 0 72,757,375 73,342,537 0 73,342,537

Contribution for Trial Courts

71,538,673 0 71,538,673 71,538,673 0 71,538,673


24,664,211 0 24,664,211 17,274,250 0 17,274,250

Total $1,446,082,902 $ 22,416,838 $1,468,499,740 $1,436,621,182 $ 33,543,674 $1,470,164,856

8



Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




11.00 0.00 11.00 11.00 0.00 11.00

Total 11.00 0.00 11.00 11.00 0.00 11.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 6,930,453 $ 0 $ 6,930,453 $ 7,006,227 $ 0 $ 7,006,227

Public Safety Proposition 172

226,886,393 0 226,886,393 227,834,141 0 227,834,141

Total $ 233,816,846 $ 0 $ 233,816,846 $ 234,840,368 $ 0 $ 234,840,368

Budget by Categories of Expenditures

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Salaries & Benefits $ 1,775,119 $ 0 $ 1,775,119 $ 1,827,367 $ 0 $ 1,827,367

Services & Supplies 6,029,217 0 6,029,217 6,043,352 0 6,043,352

Other Charges 626,117 0 626,117 635,508 0 635,508


225,386,393 0 225,386,393 226,334,141 0 226,334,141

Total $ 233,816,846 $ 0 $ 233,816,846 $ 234,840,368 $ 0 $ 234,840,368

Budget by Categories of Revenues

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Revenue From Use of Money & Property

$ 1,876,914 $ 0 $ 1,876,914 $ 1,876,914 $ 0 $ 1,876,914

Intergovernmental Revenues

220,536,681 0 220,536,681 226,628,783 0 226,628,783

Charges For Current Services

708,000 0 708,000 708,000 0 708,000

Miscellaneous Revenues

24,554 0 24,554 24,554 0 24,554

Use of Fund Balance 7,084,873 0 7,084,873 1,531,764 0 1,531,764

General Revenue Allocation

3,585,824 0 3,585,824 4,070,353 0 4,070,353

Total $ 233,816,846 $ 0 $ 233,816,846 $ 234,840,368 $ 0 $ 234,840,368


District Attorney


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



General Criminal Prosecution

553.00 0.00 553.00 553.00 0.00 553.00

Specialized Criminal Prosecution

263.00 0.00 263.00 263.00 0.00 263.00

Juvenile Court 42.00 0.00 42.00 42.00 0.00 42.00

Public Assistance Fraud

69.00 0.00 69.00 69.00 0.00 69.00

District Attorney Administration

51.00 0.00 51.00 51.00 0.00 51.00

Total 978.00 0.00 978.00 978.00 0.00 978.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



General Criminal Prosecution

$ 94,953,886 $ 0 $ 94,953,886 $ 92,753,245 $ 0 $ 92,753,245

Specialized Criminal Prosecution

46,256,101 0 46,256,101 47,695,451 0 47,695,451

Juvenile Court 5,896,983 0 5,896,983 6,345,678 0 6,345,678

Public Assistance Fraud

(1,159,565) 0 (1,159,565) (907,621) 0 (907,621)

District Attorney Administration

8,117,683 0 8,117,683 8,211,300 0 8,211,300

District Attorney Asset Forfeiture Program

615,000 0 615,000 615,000 0 615,000

Total $ 154,680,088 $ 0 $ 154,680,088 $ 154,713,053 $ 0 $ 154,713,053

10




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 3,194,069 0 3,194,069 3,194,069 0 3,194,069


1,382,200 0 1,382,200 382,200 0 382,200


(9,176,168) 0 (9,176,168) (9,176,168) 0 (9,176,168)


100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 100,000

Management Reserves 3,500,000 0 3,500,000 0 0 0

Total $ 154,680,088 $ 0 $ 154,680,088 $ 154,713,053 $ 0 $ 154,713,053


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 19,171,158 $ 0 $ 19,171,158 $ 19,171,158 $ 0 $ 19,171,158


1,060,000 0 1,060,000 1,060,000 0 1,060,000


2,616,297 0 2,616,297 2,616,297 0 2,616,297

Other Financing Sources

45,944,485 0 45,944,485 45,762,905 0 45,762,905

Use of Fund Balance 5,242,927 0 5,242,927 615,000 0 615,000


80,645,221 0 80,645,221 85,487,693 0 85,487,693

Total $ 154,680,088 $ 0 $ 154,680,088 $ 154,713,053 $ 0 $ 154,713,053


Sheriff

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Detention Services Proposes an increase of 20.00 staff years and related revenue of $2.2 million for the East Mesa Re-Entry andRehabilitation Facility due to the implementation of Assembly Bill (AB) 109, Public Safety Realignment (2011). On May24, 2012, the Executive Committee of the Community Corrections Partnership recommended that these positions,equipment, services and supplies, fixed assets, and the revenue changes described below, be supported by theCounty Local Revenue Fund 2011, Local Community Corrections Account. Proposes an increase of $0.1 million in cost applied expenditure transfers (reimbursement) for food services providedto the Probation Department. Since this is a reimbursement, it has the effect of a $0.1 million decrease in expenditures.Proposes an increase of $0.7 million for contract costs and related revenue associated with the electronic monitoringof offenders supervised by the Sheriff’s County Parole and Alternate Custody unit offset by the County Local RevenueFund 2011, Local Community Corrections Account.Proposes a decrease of $2.2 million in Institutional Care State revenue offset by an increase of the same amount in theCounty Local Revenue Fund 2011, Local Community Corrections Account.

Law Enforcement ServicesProposes an increase of 2.00 staff years and related revenue of $0.2 million for the North County Transit District forcontracted law enforcement services. This is a planned agenda item for a July 2012 Board of Supervisors meeting.Proposes an increase of $66,000 for overtime costs based on revenue from the Sheriff's Asset Forfeiture Program.Proposes an increase of $35,000 for the North County Gang Task Force to purchase equipment funded by revenuefrom the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) program.Proposes an increase of $0.2 million for the Fiscal Year 2012-13 award of Indian Gaming Local Community BenefitCommittee Grant funds to purchase automated license plate readers, equipment and training. The Board ofSupervisors approved the County's participation in this annual grant program on January 12, 2005 (12). The grantaward notification was made on April 25, 2012, subsequent to the submission of the CAO Proposed Operational Plan.Proposes the following rebudgets:

$0.6 million for the Fiscal Year 2011 Port Security Grant approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 6, 2011(5). $0.2 million for the Fiscal Year 2011 DNA Backlog Reduction program grant approved by the Board of Supervisorson October 25, 2011 (1). $0.1 million for the Sobriety Checkpoints Mini-Grant Program approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 24,2012 (2). $20,000 for the 2010 Child Sexual Predator Program approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 7, 2010(1). $19,735 based on a donation from the Tarquinio Trust approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 27, 2009(1). The funds will be used for the benefit and welfare of the Fallbrook Senior Volunteer Patrol.

12



Proposes the following rebudgets of fund balance:$0.2 million for equipment in Criminal Intelligence Detail.$40,000 for the replacement of interview room equipment in Homicide.

Proposes a decrease of $1.3 million for Homeland Security Grants to include the 2010 State Homeland Security Grant,the 2011 State Homeland Security Grant, the 2010 Urban Area Safety Initiative Grant, the 2011 Urban Area SafetyInitiative Grant, Anti-Terrorism funds, the 2010 Operation Stonegarden Grant Program and the 2011 OperationStonegarden Grant Program due to revised spending estimates received subsequent to the submission of the CAOProposed Operational Plan. Proposes a decrease of $12,908 for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Edward Byrne JusticeAssistance Grant program passed through the City of Lemon Grove due to revised spending estimates receivedsubsequent to the submission of the CAO Proposed Operational Plan.Proposes a decrease of $0.1 million for the 2012 Drug Enforcement Administration Domestic Cannabis Eradication/Suppression Program due to modifications to program funding received subsequent to the submission of the CAOProposed Operational Plan.

Human Resource ServicesProposes the rebudget of $0.1 million for the replacement of safety equipment based on fund balance.Proposes an increase of $25,233 for safety equipment and services and supplies for new personnel supporting theEast Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility as described above.Proposes a decrease of $0.1 million for the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program approved by the Board ofSupervisors on November 8, 2011 (5) due to revised spending estimates received subsequent to the submission of theCAO Proposed Operational Plan.

Management Services Proposes an increase of $64,393 for the purchase of services and supplies due to the increase in cost appliedreimbursement for services provided to the Probation Department for food services received subsequent to thesubmission of the CAO Proposed Operational Plan. Proposes a decrease of $31,958 for the 2010 Child Sexual Predator Program approved by the Board of Supervisorson December 7, 2010 (1) due to revised spending estimates received subsequent to the submission of the CAOProposed Operational Plan.

Sheriff's Internal Service Funds (ISF) / IT Proposes an increase of $1.4 million and related revenue for the purchase of transportation equipment and modulartrailers supporting the East Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility as described above.Proposes the rebudget of $0.3 million for equipment to outfit the new Rancho San Diego station based on fundbalance. Proposes a decrease of $7,826 for the 2011 Operation Stonegarden Grant program due to revised spending estimatesreceived subsequent to the submission of the CAO Proposed Operational Plan.

Office of the SheriffProposes an increase of $5,000 in Sheriff's Special Fund for the North County Gang Task Force funded by revenuefrom the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) program.

Sheriff's Inmate Welfare FundProposes an increase of $0.1 million for an offsite legal research contract based on Inmate Welfare fund balance.Proposes an increase of $0.4 million in Operating Transfers Out due to a transfer from the Inmate Welfare in support ofexpenditures for the East Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility as described above.



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Detention ServicesProposes an increase of 126.00 staff years and related revenue of $13.5 million for the East Mesa Re-Entry andRehabilitation Facility due to the implementation of Public Safety Realignment. On May 24, 2012, the ExecutiveCommittee of the Community Corrections Partnership recommended that these costs be supported by the CountyLocal Revenue Fund 2011, Local Community Corrections Account.Proposes an increase of $0.1 million in cost applied expenditure transfers (reimbursement) for services provided to theProbation Department for food services as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13 - Detention Services.Proposes the decrease of $2.2 million in Institutional Care State revenue offset by an increase of County LocalRevenue Fund 2011, Local Community Corrections Account as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13 - DetentionServices.Proposes an increase of $0.7 million and related revenue for the electronic monitoring contract as described above inFiscal Year 2012-13 - Detention Services.

Law Enforcement ServicesProposes an increase of 2.00 staff years and related revenue of $0.2 million for the North County Transit District asdescribed above in Fiscal Year 2012-13 – Law Enforcement Services.Proposes a decrease of $14,112 based on a donation from the Tarquinio Trust approved by the Board of Supervisorson January 27, 2009 (1). The donation was spread over a five year period and the funds are anticipated to be spent byFiscal Year 2012-13.

Human Resource ServicesProposes an increase of $0.2 million for safety equipment supporting the East Mesa Re-Entry and RehabilitationFacility as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13 – Human Resource Services.Proposes an increase of $36,720 for the Detentions Academy supporting the East Mesa Re-Entry and RehabilitationFacility as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13 – Human Resource Services.

Management ServicesProposes an increase of 1.00 staff year and related revenue of $0.1 million for the East Mesa Re-Entry andRehabilitation Facility due to the implementation of Public Safety Realignment.Proposes an increase of $0.1 million for the purchase of services and supplies as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13 – Management Services.

Sheriff's Internal Service Funds (ISF) / IT Proposes an increase of $0.8 million and related revenue for the purchase of transportation equipment supporting theEast Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13 – Sheriff's Internal ServiceFunds (ISF) / IT.

Sheriff's Inmate Welfare FundProposes an increase of $0.1 million for the Grossmont Union High School District contracted educational servicesassociated with the increase in inmates at the East Mesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility.Proposes an increase of $0.1 million for an offsite legal research contract as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13 –Sheriff's Inmate Welfare Fund. Proposes an increase of $0.7 million in Operating Transfers Out due to a transfer from the Inmate Welfare for the EastMesa Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13 – Sheriff's Inmate Welfare Fund.

14



Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Detention Services 1,772.00 20.00 1,792.00 1,772.00 126.00 1,898.00

Law Enforcement Services

1,326.00 2.00 1,328.00 1,327.00 2.00 1,329.00

Sheriff's Court Services 373.00 0.00 373.00 373.00 0.00 373.00

Human Resource Services

129.00 0.00 129.00 129.00 0.00 129.00

Management Services 241.00 0.00 241.00 241.00 1.00 242.00

Sheriff's ISF / IT 12.00 0.00 12.00 12.00 0.00 12.00

Office of the Sheriff 21.00 0.00 21.00 21.00 0.00 21.00

Total 3,874.00 22.00 3,896.00 3,875.00 129.00 4,004.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Detention Services $ 222,969,664 $ 2,791,507 $ 225,761,171 $ 232,862,930 $ 14,097,839 $ 246,960,769

Law Enforcement Services

207,148,154 198,460 207,346,614 197,891,965 182,332 198,074,297

Sheriff's Court Services 48,510,270 0 48,510,270 50,750,717 0 50,750,717

Human Resource Services

22,053,674 1,198 22,054,872 22,438,419 263,404 22,701,823

Management Services 40,070,863 32,435 40,103,298 33,538,795 148,038 33,686,833

Sheriff's ISF / IT 70,223,431 1,741,424 71,964,855 70,027,258 788,371 70,815,629

Office of the Sheriff 4,299,570 5,000 4,304,570 4,014,279 0 4,014,279

Sheriff's Asset Forfeiture Program

1,100,000 0 1,100,000 1,100,000 0 1,100,000

Sheriff's Jail Stores ISF 6,815,423 0 6,815,423 6,815,423 0 6,815,423

Sheriff's Inmate Welfare Fund

4,991,236 430,388 5,421,624 4,991,236 847,264 5,838,500

Countywide 800 MHZ CSA's

873,857 0 873,857 873,857 0 873,857

Total $ 629,056,142 $ 5,200,412 $ 634,256,554 $ 625,304,879 $ 16,327,248 $ 641,632,127




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Salaries & Benefits $ 467,236,318 $ 2,483,715 $ 469,720,033 $ 487,734,181 $ 12,183,195 $ 499,917,376

Services & Supplies 142,270,005 (695,362) 141,574,643 119,846,438 3,139,857 122,986,295

Other Charges 19,289,166 0 19,289,166 19,289,166 437,325 19,726,491


3,223,350 3,103,064 6,326,414 1,397,791 0 1,397,791


(7,657,060) (134,393) (7,791,453) (7,657,060) (134,393) (7,791,453)


4,694,363 443,388 5,137,751 4,694,363 701,264 5,395,627

Total $ 629,056,142 $ 5,200,412 $ 634,256,554 $ 625,304,879 $ 16,327,248 $ 641,632,127


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Licenses Permits & Franchises

$ 463,000 $ 0 $ 463,000 $ 463,000 $ 0 $ 463,000

Fines, Forfeitures & Penalties

11,994,629 0 11,994,629 9,608,857 0 9,608,857


7,892,842 0 7,892,842 8,031,550 0 8,031,550


73,375,384 5,737,137 79,112,521 55,485,194 16,797,388 72,282,582


89,641,644 (2,014,636) 87,627,008 93,102,007 (2,004,556) 91,097,451


14,327,253 0 14,327,253 8,304,253 78,888 8,383,141


167,836,659 443,388 168,280,047 168,356,777 701,264 169,058,041

Use of Fund Balance 357,441 1,034,523 1,391,964 0 754,264 754,264


263,167,290 0 263,167,290 281,953,241 0 281,953,241

Total $ 629,056,142 $ 5,200,412 $ 634,256,554 $ 625,304,879 $ 16,327,248 $ 641,632,127

Public Safety Group Changes16 CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Child Support Services


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Production Operations 354.00 0.00 354.00 354.00 0.00 354.00

Staff Development Division

47.00 0.00 47.00 47.00 0.00 47.00

Quality Assurance 20.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 20.00

Administrative Services

46.00 0.00 46.00 46.00 0.00 46.00

Recurring Maintenance and Operations

5.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00

Total 472.00 0.00 472.00 472.00 0.00 472.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Community Outreach $ 316 $ 0 $ 316 $ 316 $ 0 $ 316

Production Operations 38,177,253 0 38,177,253 39,646,099 0 39,646,099

Staff Development Division

5,872,828 0 5,872,828 6,082,992 0 6,082,992

Quality Assurance 1,831,001 0 1,831,001 1,890,895 0 1,890,895

Administrative Services

4,326,182 0 4,326,182 4,446,958 0 4,446,958

Recurring Maintenance and Operations

748,532 0 748,532 776,441 0 776,441

Help Desk Support 294 0 294 294 0 294

Total $ 50,956,406 $ 0 $ 50,956,406 $ 52,843,995 $ 0 $ 52,843,995




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 50,956,406 $ 0 $ 50,956,406 $ 52,843,995 $ 0 $ 52,843,995


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 50,308,738 $ 0 $ 50,308,738 $ 51,537,245 $ 0 $ 51,537,245


46,500 0 46,500 46,500 0 46,500


4,000 0 4,000 4,000 0 4,000

Use of Fund Balance 597,168 0 597,168 1,256,250 0 1,256,250

Total $ 50,956,406 $ 0 $ 50,956,406 $ 52,843,995 $ 0 $ 52,843,995


Citizens Law Enforcement Review Board


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Law Enforcement Review Board

4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00

Total 4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Law Enforcement Review Board

$ 588,111 $ 0 $ 588,111 $ 601,799 $ 0 $ 601,799

Total $ 588,111 $ 0 $ 588,111 $ 601,799 $ 0 $ 601,799


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Salaries & Benefits $ 474,622 $ 0 $ 474,622 $ 488,310 $ 0 $ 488,310

Services & Supplies 113,489 0 113,489 113,489 0 113,489

Total $ 588,111 $ 0 $ 588,111 $ 601,799 $ 0 $ 601,799




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 588,111 $ 0 $ 588,111 $ 601,799 $ 0 $ 601,799

Total $ 588,111 $ 0 $ 588,111 $ 601,799 $ 0 $ 601,799




Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




17.00 0.00 17.00 17.00 0.00 17.00

Total 17.00 0.00 17.00 17.00 0.00 17.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 9,180,674 $ 0 $ 9,180,674 $ 5,392,696 $ 0 $ 5,392,696

Total $ 9,180,674 $ 0 $ 9,180,674 $ 5,392,696 $ 0 $ 5,392,696


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 5,158,201 0 5,158,201 1,718,595 0 1,718,595

Total $ 9,180,674 $ 0 $ 9,180,674 $ 5,392,696 $ 0 $ 5,392,696




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 7,771,004 $ 0 $ 7,771,004 $ 3,953,705 $ 0 $ 3,953,705

Use of Fund Balance 450,000 0 450,000 450,000 0 450,000


959,670 0 959,670 988,991 0 988,991

Total $ 9,180,674 $ 0 $ 9,180,674 $ 5,392,696 $ 0 $ 5,392,696


Medical Examiner


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Decedent Investigations

52.00 0.00 52.00 52.00 0.00 52.00

Total 52.00 0.00 52.00 52.00 0.00 52.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Decedent Investigations

$ 8,951,213 $ 0 $ 8,951,213 $ 9,199,329 $ 0 $ 9,199,329

Total $ 8,951,213 $ 0 $ 8,951,213 $ 9,199,329 $ 0 $ 9,199,329


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






50,000 0 50,000 0 0 0


(100,000) 0 (100,000) (100,000) 0 (100,000)

Total $ 8,951,213 $ 0 $ 8,951,213 $ 9,199,329 $ 0 $ 9,199,329




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 111,477 $ 0 $ 111,477


775,903 0 775,903 775,903 0 775,903


53,460 0 53,460 53,460 0 53,460

Use of Fund Balance 62,500 0 62,500 0 0 0


8,059,350 0 8,059,350 8,258,489 0 8,258,489

Total $ 8,951,213 $ 0 $ 8,951,213 $ 9,199,329 $ 0 $ 9,199,329


Probation

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Adult Field ServicesProposes an increase of 32.00 staff years and associated services and supplies and related revenue of $16.2 million forAssembly Bill (AB) 109, Public Safety Realignment (2011). These positions are required to supervise the estimatedpopulation of offenders in the community in Fiscal Year 2012-13 and will augment staffing previously approved by theBoard of Supervisors. Funds are also included to support services in the community for offenders, provided through theCommunity Transition Center, the Residential Reentry Center, as well as mental health treatment, substance abusetreatment, and vocational and behavioral services to assist offenders in their reintegration back to the communities. OnMay 24, 2012, the Executive Committee of the Community Corrections Partnership recommended that these positionsand services be supported by the County Local Revenue Fund 2011, Local Community Corrections Account.

Juvenile Field ServicesProposes an increase of 2.00 staff years and associated services and supplies and related revenue of $1.2 million forthe Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act funded by the State of California, Local Revenue Fund 2011 allocated to theCounty Local Revenue Fund 2011, Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Account. These positions and contractedservices will provide additional support and enhanced services to the Breaking Cycles Program, Juvenile DelinquencyDrug Court and Substance Abuse Program, Community Assessment Teams, Truancy Supervision Program, andForensic Assistance for Stabilization and Treatment of Juvenile Offenders Program.Proposes the reduction of 2.00 staff years and related revenue of $0.2 million for the Truancy Intervention Program asa result of a reduction in school district revenue. Truancy intervention services at the La Mesa / Spring Valley and SanDiego Unified School District will no longer be staffed with probation officers.

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Adult Field ServicesProposes an increase of 32.00 staff years and associated services and supplies and related revenue of $16.2 millionfrom the County Local Revenue Fund 2011, Local Community Corrections Account for Public Safety Realignment asdescribed above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Juvenile Field ServicesProposes an increase of 2.00 staff years and associated services and supplies and related revenue of $1.2 million forJuvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act funded by the State of California, Local Revenue Fund 2011 as described abovein Fiscal Year 2012-13.Proposes the reduction of 2.00 staff years and related revenue $0.2 million for the Truancy Intervention Program as aresult of a reduction in school district revenue as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.



Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Adult Field Services 389.00 32.00 421.00 389.00 32.00 421.00

Institutional Services 520.00 0.00 520.00 520.00 0.00 520.00

Juvenile Field Services 318.00 0.00 318.00 318.00 0.00 318.00

Department Administration

72.00 0.00 72.00 72.00 0.00 72.00

Total 1,299.00 32.00 1,331.00 1,299.00 32.00 1,331.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Adult Field Services $ 49,675,725 $ 16,215,000 $ 65,890,725 $ 49,755,686 $ 16,215,000 $ 65,970,686

Institutional Services 70,493,875 0 70,493,875 72,673,236 0 72,673,236

Juvenile Field Services 52,994,166 996,811 53,990,977 54,048,353 996,811 55,045,164

Department Administration

16,584,397 4,615 16,589,012 14,947,328 4,615 14,951,943

Probation Asset Forfeiture Program

50,000 0 50,000 50,000 0 50,000

Probation Inmate Welfare Fund

95,000 0 95,000 95,000 0 95,000

Total $ 189,893,163 $ 17,216,426 $ 207,109,589 $ 191,569,603 $ 17,216,426 $ 208,786,029


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Salaries & Benefits $ 132,683,884 $ 3,378,750 $ 136,062,634 $ 137,561,625 $ 3,503,532 $ 141,065,157

Services & Supplies 50,182,019 13,837,676 64,019,695 47,130,718 13,712,894 60,843,612

Other Charges 8,954,736 0 8,954,736 8,954,736 0 8,954,736


(1,927,476) 0 (1,927,476) (2,077,476) 0 (2,077,476)

Total $ 189,893,163 $ 17,216,426 $ 207,109,589 $ 191,569,603 $ 17,216,426 $ 208,786,029

26




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 1,068,500 $ 0 $ 1,068,500 $ 568,500 $ 0 $ 568,500


95,000 0 95,000 95,000 0 95,000


62,354,812 17,408,309 79,763,121 62,354,812 17,408,309 79,763,121


8,160,387 (191,883) 7,968,504 8,410,387 (191,883) 8,218,504


7,132 0 7,132 7,132 0 7,132


16,399,612 0 16,399,612 17,008,822 0 17,008,822



99,715,586 0 99,715,586 103,074,950 0 103,074,950

Total $ 189,893,163 $ 17,216,426 $ 207,109,589 $ 191,569,603 $ 17,216,426 $ 208,786,029


Public Defender


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Primary Public Defender

274.00 0.00 274.00 274.00 0.00 274.00

Office of Assigned Counsel

6.00 0.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00

Alternate Public Defender

44.00 0.00 44.00 44.00 0.00 44.00

Multiple Conflicts Office

8.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 8.00

Administration 14.00 0.00 14.00 14.00 0.00 14.00

Total 346.00 0.00 346.00 346.00 0.00 346.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Primary Public Defender

$ 44,551,819 $ 0 $ 44,551,819 $ 46,287,153 $ 0 $ 46,287,153

Office of Assigned Counsel

7,436,174 0 7,436,174 7,466,230 0 7,466,230

Alternate Public Defender

7,543,123 0 7,543,123 7,846,478 0 7,846,478

Multiple Conflicts Office

1,395,955 0 1,395,955 1,444,965 0 1,444,965

Administration 11,830,304 0 11,830,304 10,297,711 0 10,297,711

Total $ 72,757,375 $ 0 $ 72,757,375 $ 73,342,537 $ 0 $ 73,342,537

28




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 72,757,375 $ 0 $ 72,757,375 $ 73,342,537 $ 0 $ 73,342,537


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 51,347 $ 0 $ 51,347 $ 51,347 $ 0 $ 51,347


1,962,239 0 1,962,239 1,962,239 0 1,962,239


850,000 0 850,000 850,000 0 850,000


200,000 0 200,000 200,000 0 200,000



67,008,580 0 67,008,580 69,173,951 0 69,173,951

Total $ 72,757,375 $ 0 $ 72,757,375 $ 73,342,537 $ 0 $ 73,342,537




Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




13.00 0.00 13.00 13.00 0.00 13.00

Total 13.00 0.00 13.00 13.00 0.00 13.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 22,830,958 $ 0 $ 22,830,958 $ 15,746,453 $ 0 $ 15,746,453

County Service Areas - Fire Prevention

1,833,253 0 1,833,253 1,527,797 0 1,527,797

Total $ 24,664,211 $ 0 $ 24,664,211 $ 17,274,250 $ 0 $ 17,274,250


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






768,760 0 768,760 200,000 0 200,000


1,883,000 0 1,883,000 0 0 0


801,611 0 801,611 496,155 0 496,155

Total $ 24,664,211 $ 0 $ 24,664,211 $ 17,274,250 $ 0 $ 17,274,250

30




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Taxes Current Property $ 580,615 $ 0 $ 580,615 $ 580,615 $ 0 $ 580,615


43,710 0 43,710 43,710 0 43,710


4,139,652 0 4,139,652 0 0 0


543,472 0 543,472 543,472 0 543,472


665,456 0 665,456 360,000 0 360,000

Use of Fund Balance 2,997,868 0 2,997,868 0 0 0


15,693,438 0 15,693,438 15,746,453 0 15,746,453

Total $ 24,664,211 $ 0 $ 24,664,211 $ 17,274,250 $ 0 $ 17,274,250

31Health and Human Services Agency Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Health and Human Services Agency Changes

Health and Human Services Agency Summary


The Health and Human Services Agency staffing level in the revised Proposed Operational Plan is 5,306.25 staff years forFiscal Year 2012-13 and 5,306.25 for Fiscal Year 2013-14. This is unchanged from the staff years in the CAO ProposedOperational Plan, which proposed an increase of 176.00 staff years or 3.4% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Adopted Budget.


The Health and Human Services Agency appropriations in the revised Proposed Operational Plan are $1.9 billion for FiscalYear 2012-13 and $1.9 billion for Fiscal Year 2013-14. Total expenditure appropriations have a zero net change in Fiscal Year2012-13 from the appropriations included in the CAO Proposed Operational Plan, which proposed an increase of $9.0million or 0.4% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Adopted Budget.

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:Increase of $6.0 million for a total of $9.0 million in services and supplies, contracted services, in Behavioral HealthServices as recommended by the Executive Committee of the Community Corrections Partnership. This program willprovide contracted mental health and substance abuse treatment services to offenders referred per Assembly Bill (AB)109, Public Safety Realignment (2011).Increase of $6.0 million for a total of $9.0 million in Expenditure Transfer and Reimbursements for services under AB109 through the Probation Department. Since this is a reimbursement for services, it has the effect of decreasingexpenditures by $6.0 million. This results in a zero net change in total appropriations.

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2013-14 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:Increase of $6.0 million in services and supplies, contracted services, in Behavioral Health Services as describedabove in Fiscal Year 2012-13.Increase of $6.0 million in Expenditure Transfer and Reimbursements as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

32


Health and Human Services Agency ChangesCAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Regional Operations 2,432.00 0.00 2,432.00 2,432.00 0.00 2,432.00

Strategic Planning & Operational Support

211.00 0.00 211.00 211.00 0.00 211.00

Aging and Independence Services

291.50 0.00 291.50 291.50 0.00 291.50

Behavioral Health Services

829.50 0.00 829.50 829.50 0.00 829.50

Child Welfare Services 717.50 0.00 717.50 717.50 0.00 717.50

Public Health Services 483.75 0.00 483.75 483.75 0.00 483.75

Public Administrator / Public Guardian

34.00 0.00 34.00 34.00 0.00 34.00

Administrative Support

307.00 0.00 307.00 307.00 0.00 307.00

Total 5,306.25 0.00 5,306.25 5,306.25 0.00 5,306.25


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Regional Operations $ 467,713,267 $ 0 $ 467,713,267 $ 471,967,479 $ 0 $ 471,967,479

Strategic Planning & Operational Support

235,222,731 0 235,222,731 234,408,045 0 234,408,045

Aging and Independence Services

312,514,970 0 312,514,970 313,187,286 0 313,187,286


431,072,490 0 431,072,490 433,581,666 0 433,581,666

Child Welfare Services 248,498,925 0 248,498,925 252,210,994 0 252,210,994

Public Health Services 101,441,269 0 101,441,269 104,549,881 0 104,549,881

Public Administrator / Public Guardian

4,457,052 0 4,457,052 4,052,887 0 4,052,887


100,483,108 0 100,483,108 79,946,593 0 79,946,593

Tobacco Settlement Funds

27,500,000 0 27,500,000 27,500,000 0 27,500,000

Total $1,928,903,812 $ 0 $1,928,903,812 $1,921,404,831 $ 0 $1,921,404,831


Regional Operations


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Regional Self Suffic Elig

1,272.00 0.00 1,272.00 1,272.00 0.00 1,272.00

Regional Child Welfare Svcs

621.00 0.00 621.00 621.00 0.00 621.00

Central Region 147.00 0.00 147.00 147.00 0.00 147.00

East Region 94.50 0.00 94.50 94.50 0.00 94.50

North Central Region 94.00 0.00 94.00 94.00 0.00 94.00

North Coastal Region 61.00 0.00 61.00 61.00 0.00 61.00

North Inland Region 66.00 0.00 66.00 66.00 0.00 66.00

South Region 76.50 0.00 76.50 76.50 0.00 76.50

Total 2,432.00 0.00 2,432.00 2,432.00 0.00 2,432.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Regional Self Suffic Elig

$ 337,995,218 $ 0 $ 337,995,218 $ 341,028,992 $ 0 $ 341,028,992

Regional Child Welfare Svcs

56,948,047 0 56,948,047 58,501,682 0 58,501,682

Central Region 21,911,769 0 21,911,769 21,031,625 0 21,031,625

East Region 12,423,214 0 12,423,214 12,646,649 0 12,646,649

North Central Region 9,686,781 0 9,686,781 9,896,314 0 9,896,314

North Coastal Region 8,844,055 0 8,844,055 8,870,359 0 8,870,359

North Inland Region 8,714,183 0 8,714,183 8,639,269 0 8,639,269

South Region 11,190,000 0 11,190,000 11,352,589 0 11,352,589

Total $ 467,713,267 $ 0 $ 467,713,267 $ 471,967,479 $ 0 $ 471,967,479

34




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 244,521,147 0 244,521,147 244,521,147 0 244,521,147

Total $ 467,713,267 $ 0 $ 467,713,267 $ 471,967,479 $ 0 $ 471,967,479


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 50,000 $ 0 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 0 $ 50,000


442,765,258 0 442,765,258 442,172,021 0 442,172,021


1,901,051 0 1,901,051 1,901,051 0 1,901,051


771,235 0 771,235 771,235 0 771,235


0 0 0 5,675,935 0 5,675,935



19,854,566 0 19,854,566 21,397,237 0 21,397,237

Total $ 467,713,267 $ 0 $ 467,713,267 $ 471,967,479 $ 0 $ 471,967,479


Strategic Planning and Operational Support


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Administration 89.00 0.00 89.00 89.00 0.00 89.00

Health Care Administration

36.00 0.00 36.00 36.00 0.00 36.00

Self Sufficiency Services and Support

86.00 0.00 86.00 86.00 0.00 86.00

Total 211.00 0.00 211.00 211.00 0.00 211.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Administration $ 30,511,519 $ 0 $ 30,511,519 $ 30,732,277 $ 0 $ 30,732,277

Health Care Administration

162,175,130 0 162,175,130 162,025,832 0 162,025,832

Child Care Planning Council

725,326 0 725,326 725,326 0 725,326

Self Sufficiency Services and Support

41,810,756 0 41,810,756 40,924,610 0 40,924,610

Total $ 235,222,731 $ 0 $ 235,222,731 $ 234,408,045 $ 0 $ 234,408,045


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 235,222,731 $ 0 $ 235,222,731 $ 234,408,045 $ 0 $ 234,408,045

36




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 3,349,216 $ 0 $ 3,349,216 $ 3,349,216 $ 0 $ 3,349,216


1,019,083 0 1,019,083 1,019,083 0 1,019,083


187,993,662 0 187,993,662 186,319,421 0 186,319,421


11,201,118 0 11,201,118 11,209,014 0 11,209,014


5,000 0 5,000 5,000 0 5,000


20,600,000 0 20,600,000 20,600,000 0 20,600,000


0 0 0 906,311 0 906,311



11,000,000 0 11,000,000 11,000,000 0 11,000,000

Total $ 235,222,731 $ 0 $ 235,222,731 $ 234,408,045 $ 0 $ 234,408,045


Aging & Independence Services


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



In-Home Supportive Services

150.00 0.00 150.00 150.00 0.00 150.00

Veterans Services 8.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 8.00

Senior Health and Social Services

44.00 0.00 44.00 44.00 0.00 44.00

Protective Services 66.50 0.00 66.50 66.50 0.00 66.50

Administrative and Other Services

23.00 0.00 23.00 23.00 0.00 23.00

Total 291.50 0.00 291.50 291.50 0.00 291.50

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



In-Home Supportive Services

$ 284,713,146 $ 0 $ 284,713,146 $ 285,054,488 $ 0 $ 285,054,488

Veterans Services 947,256 0 947,256 946,734 0 946,734

Senior Health and Social Services

14,405,024 0 14,405,024 14,542,222 0 14,542,222

Protective Services 8,353,562 0 8,353,562 8,561,883 0 8,561,883

Administrative and Other Services

4,095,982 0 4,095,982 4,081,959 0 4,081,959

Total $ 312,514,970 $ 0 $ 312,514,970 $ 313,187,286 $ 0 $ 313,187,286

38




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 0 5,000


13,196,433 0 13,196,433 13,196,433 0 13,196,433

Total $ 312,514,970 $ 0 $ 312,514,970 $ 313,187,286 $ 0 $ 313,187,286


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 185,660 $ 0 $ 185,660 $ 185,660 $ 0 $ 185,660


303,535,138 0 303,535,138 303,303,688 0 303,303,688


111,333 0 111,333 86,333 0 86,333


100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 100,000


0 0 0 1,015,264 0 1,015,264



8,496,341 0 8,496,341 8,496,341 0 8,496,341

Total $ 312,514,970 $ 0 $ 312,514,970 $ 313,187,286 $ 0 $ 313,187,286



Fiscal Year 2012-13Proposes an increase of $6.0 million in services and supplies, contracted mental health and substance abuse services,for a total of $9.0 million committed for Assembly Bill (AB) 109, Public Safety Realignment (2011), as recommended onMay 24, 2012 by the Executive Committee of the Community Corrections Partnership. Proposes an increase of $6.0 million for a total of $9.0 million in Expenditure Transfer and Reimbursements forservices under AB 109 through the Probation Department. Since this is a reimbursement for services, it has the effectof decreasing expenditures by $6.0 million.

Fiscal Year 2013-14Proposes an increase of $6.0 million in services and supplies, contracted mental health and substance abuse services,for a total of $9.0 million committed for AB 109 as recommended by the Executive Committee of the CommunityCorrections Partnership.Proposes an increase of $6.0 million in Expenditure Transfer and Reimbursements for services under AB 109 asdescribed above. Since this is a reimbursement for services, it has the effect of decreasing expenditures by $6.0million.

Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Alcohol and Other Drug Services

25.00 0.00 25.00 25.00 0.00 25.00

Mental Health Services

284.25 0.00 284.25 284.25 0.00 284.25

Inpatient Health Services

459.25 0.00 459.25 459.25 0.00 459.25

Behavioral Health Svcs Administration

61.00 0.00 61.00 61.00 0.00 61.00

Total 829.50 0.00 829.50 829.50 0.00 829.50

40



Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Alcohol and Other Drug Services

$ 59,483,556 $ 0 $ 59,483,556 $ 59,569,476 $ 0 $ 59,569,476

Mental Health Services

299,301,560 0 299,301,560 300,939,189 0 300,939,189

Inpatient Health Services

63,488,189 0 63,488,189 64,061,916 0 64,061,916

Behavioral Health Svcs Administration

8,799,185 0 8,799,185 9,011,085 0 9,011,085

Total $ 431,072,490 $ 0 $ 431,072,490 $ 433,581,666 $ 0 $ 433,581,666


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




Services & Supplies 345,462,632 6,000,000 351,462,632 345,772,132 6,000,000 351,772,132

Other Charges 3,030,506 0 3,030,506 3,005,506 0 3,005,506


170,000 0 170,000 90,000 0 90,000


(3,043,424) (6,000,000) (9,043,424) (3,043,424) (6,000,000) (9,043,424)

Total $ 431,072,490 $ 0 $ 431,072,490 $ 433,581,666 $ 0 $ 433,581,666


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 383,194,071 $ 0 $ 383,194,071 $ 385,603,805 $ 0 $ 385,603,805


34,624,144 0 34,624,144 34,925,146 0 34,925,146


2,554,573 0 2,554,573 2,554,573 0 2,554,573


3,000,000 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 3,000,000



7,498,142 0 7,498,142 7,498,142 0 7,498,142

Total $ 431,072,490 $ 0 $ 431,072,490 $ 433,581,666 $ 0 $ 433,581,666


Child Welfare Services


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Child Welfare Services 485.50 0.00 485.50 485.50 0.00 485.50

Foster Care 94.00 0.00 94.00 94.00 0.00 94.00

Adoptions 138.00 0.00 138.00 138.00 0.00 138.00

Total 717.50 0.00 717.50 717.50 0.00 717.50

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Child Welfare Services $ 72,092,486 $ 0 $ 72,092,486 $ 73,198,804 $ 0 $ 73,198,804

Foster Care 161,814,273 0 161,814,273 164,086,468 0 164,086,468

Adoptions 14,592,166 0 14,592,166 14,925,722 0 14,925,722

Total $ 248,498,925 $ 0 $ 248,498,925 $ 252,210,994 $ 0 $ 252,210,994


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 154,631,346 0 154,631,346 156,726,414 0 156,726,414

Total $ 248,498,925 $ 0 $ 248,498,925 $ 252,210,994 $ 0 $ 252,210,994

42




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 654,000 $ 0 $ 654,000 $ 654,000 $ 0 $ 654,000


681,211 0 681,211 681,211 0 681,211


230,913,784 0 230,913,784 232,850,534 0 232,850,534


4,615,622 0 4,615,622 4,615,622 0 4,615,622


1,791,450 0 1,791,450 1,791,450 0 1,791,450


0 0 0 2,163,314 0 2,163,314



9,454,863 0 9,454,863 9,454,863 0 9,454,863

Total $ 248,498,925 $ 0 $ 248,498,925 $ 252,210,994 $ 0 $ 252,210,994


Public Health Services


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Administration and Other Services

27.00 0.00 27.00 27.00 0.00 27.00

Bioterrorism / EMS 48.00 0.00 48.00 48.00 0.00 48.00

Infectious Disease Control

108.25 0.00 108.25 108.25 0.00 108.25

Surveillance 84.00 0.00 84.00 84.00 0.00 84.00

Prevention Services 75.50 0.00 75.50 75.50 0.00 75.50

California Childrens Services

141.00 0.00 141.00 141.00 0.00 141.00

Total 483.75 0.00 483.75 483.75 0.00 483.75

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Administration and Other Services

$ 5,476,625 $ 0 $ 5,476,625 $ 5,569,773 $ 0 $ 5,569,773

Bioterrorism / EMS 11,822,371 0 11,822,371 11,647,852 0 11,647,852

Infectious Disease Control

28,943,895 0 28,943,895 29,821,742 0 29,821,742

Surveillance 11,415,770 0 11,415,770 12,005,482 0 12,005,482

Prevention Services 13,837,019 0 13,837,019 14,682,064 0 14,682,064

California Childrens Services

19,896,224 0 19,896,224 20,352,612 0 20,352,612

Ambulance CSA's - Health & Human Services

10,049,365 0 10,049,365 10,470,356 0 10,470,356

Total $ 101,441,269 $ 0 $ 101,441,269 $ 104,549,881 $ 0 $ 104,549,881

44




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 4,585,000 0 4,585,000 4,585,000 0 4,585,000


145,070 0 145,070 145,070 0 145,070


(195,300) 0 (195,300) (195,300) 0 (195,300)

Total $ 101,441,269 $ 0 $ 101,441,269 $ 104,549,881 $ 0 $ 104,549,881


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Taxes Current Property $ 1,602,726 $ 0 $ 1,602,726 $ 1,642,726 $ 0 $ 1,642,726

Taxes Other Than Current Secured

26,784 0 26,784 26,784 0 26,784


179,039 0 179,039 179,039 0 179,039


2,263,805 0 2,263,805 2,263,805 0 2,263,805


79,000 0 79,000 79,000 0 79,000


84,000,021 0 84,000,021 84,298,933 0 84,298,933


7,480,303 0 7,480,303 8,074,761 0 8,074,761


1,096,303 0 1,096,303 1,097,520 0 1,097,520


500,000 0 500,000 500,000 0 500,000


0 0 0 2,251,375 0 2,251,375



4,085,938 0 4,085,938 4,085,938 0 4,085,938

Total $ 101,441,269 $ 0 $ 101,441,269 $ 104,549,881 $ 0 $ 104,549,881


Public Administrator/Public Guardian


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Public Administrator/Guardian

34.00 0.00 34.00 34.00 0.00 34.00

Total 34.00 0.00 34.00 34.00 0.00 34.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Public Administrator/Guardian

$ 4,457,052 $ 0 $ 4,457,052 $ 4,052,887 $ 0 $ 4,052,887

Total $ 4,457,052 $ 0 $ 4,457,052 $ 4,052,887 $ 0 $ 4,052,887


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 250,000 0 250,000 250,000 0 250,000

Total $ 4,457,052 $ 0 $ 4,457,052 $ 4,052,887 $ 0 $ 4,052,887

46




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 46,000 $ 0 $ 46,000 $ 46,000 $ 0 $ 46,000


40,000 0 40,000 40,000 0 40,000


893,838 0 893,838 893,838 0 893,838


30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 30,000



3,043,049 0 3,043,049 3,043,049 0 3,043,049

Total $ 4,457,052 $ 0 $ 4,457,052 $ 4,052,887 $ 0 $ 4,052,887




Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Agency Executive Office

27.00 0.00 27.00 27.00 0.00 27.00

Agency Contract Support

18.00 0.00 18.00 18.00 0.00 18.00

Financial Services Division

155.00 0.00 155.00 155.00 0.00 155.00

Human Resources 76.00 0.00 76.00 76.00 0.00 76.00

Management Support 10.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 10.00

Proposition 10 21.00 0.00 21.00 21.00 0.00 21.00

Total 307.00 0.00 307.00 307.00 0.00 307.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Agency Executive Office

$ 45,881,394 $ 0 $ 45,881,394 $ 25,487,622 $ 0 $ 25,487,622

Agency Contract Support

3,729,099 0 3,729,099 3,795,385 0 3,795,385

Financial Services Division

27,833,283 0 27,833,283 28,277,851 0 28,277,851

Human Resources 8,851,359 0 8,851,359 9,075,829 0 9,075,829

Management Support 11,854,399 0 11,854,399 10,889,876 0 10,889,876

Proposition 10 2,333,574 0 2,333,574 2,420,030 0 2,420,030

Total $ 100,483,108 $ 0 $ 100,483,108 $ 79,946,593 $ 0 $ 79,946,593

48




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






78,400 0 78,400 78,400 0 78,400

Management Reserves 20,000,000 0 20,000,000 20,000,000 0 20,000,000

Total $ 100,483,108 $ 0 $ 100,483,108 $ 79,946,593 $ 0 $ 79,946,593


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 78,400 $ 0 $ 78,400 $ 78,400 $ 0 $ 78,400


59,079,725 0 59,079,725 56,031,376 0 56,031,376


2,690,353 0 2,690,353 2,779,278 0 2,779,278


26,000 0 26,000 26,000 0 26,000


0 0 0 953,139 0 953,139


Total $ 100,483,108 $ 0 $ 100,483,108 $ 79,946,593 $ 0 $ 79,946,593

49Land Use and Environment Group Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Land Use and Environment Group Changes

Land Use and Environment Group Summary


The Land Use and Environment Group’s staffing level in the revised Proposed Operational Plan is 1,451.00 staff years forboth Fiscal Years 2012-13 and 2013-14. Overall, this is a proposed decrease of 5.00 staff years or 0.3% from the Fiscal Year2011-12 Adopted Operational Plan.

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed staffing changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:An increase of 3.00 staff years in the Agriculture, Weights and Measures department for increased standardization andquality control inspections and for coordination with various agencies including the Sheriff on agricultural theft.A decrease of 3.00 staff years – one in each department as follows, Environmental Health, Planning and Land Use andPublic Works due to the downturn in the economy and reduced workloads.

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed staffing changes for Fiscal Year 2013-14 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:An increase of 3.00 staff years for the Agriculture, Weights and Measures department for the reason stated above inFiscal Year 2012-13.A decrease of 3.00 staff years – one in each department, Environmental Health, Planning and Land Use and PublicWorks, as stated above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.


The Land Use and Environment Group’s appropriations in the revised Proposed Operational Plan are $391.3 million forFiscal Year 2012-13 and $359.2 million for Fiscal Year 2013-114. This is an increase of $3.4 million or 0.9% in Fiscal Year2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan, for a proposed decrease of $27.6 million or 6.6% decrease from theFiscal Year 2011-12 Adopted Operational Plan.

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:Increase of $0.3 million in Agriculture, Weights and Measures for increased standardized inspections, labeling andpackaging requirements and increased coordination with other agencies including the Sheriff’s Department onagricultural thefts.

50


Land Use and Environment Group ChangesCAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Increase of $0.54 million in Planning and Land Use for the Continuous Improvement Program to improve landdevelopment services and for a training program for the Community Planning Sponsor Groups as approved by theBoard of Supervisors.Increase of $0.58 million in Public Works and Parks and Recreation departments due to the award of three grants fromthe Indian Gaming Local Benefit Committee for Dehesa Road and Wildcat Canyon Road Rubberized Asphalt Projectsand for increased operational and maintenance costs at Louis Stelzer County Park. Increase of $0.8 million in the Public Works Road Fund Detailed Work Program for the purchase of right-of-way for theSan Vicente Road project.Rebudget of $1.15 million in Planning and Land Use for the Business Case Management System in the LandDevelopment program.

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2013-14 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:Increase of $0.3 million in Agriculture, Weights and Measures, for the reason stated above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.Decrease of $0.1 million in Public Works as a result of the reduction in staffing as stated above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Executive Office





Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Land Use and Environment Executive Office

10.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 10.00

Agriculture, Weights and Measures

150.00 3.00 153.00 150.00 3.00 153.00

Air Pollution Control District

146.00 0.00 146.00 146.00 0.00 146.00

Environmental Health 282.00 (1.00) 281.00 282.00 (1.00) 281.00

Farm and Home Advisor

2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00

Parks and Recreation 175.00 0.00 175.00 175.00 0.00 175.00

Planning and Land Use

161.00 (1.00) 160.00 161.00 (1.00) 160.00

Public Works 525.00 (1.00) 524.00 525.00 (1.00) 524.00

Total 1,451.00 0.00 1,451.00 1,451.00 0.00 1,451.00


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 6,840,090 $ 0 $ 6,840,090 $ 4,641,447 $ 0 $ 4,641,447


18,694,994 325,000 19,019,994 18,375,640 325,000 18,700,640


44,274,271 0 44,274,271 45,179,512 0 45,179,512

Environmental Health 46,123,629 0 46,123,629 42,983,376 0 42,983,376


853,058 0 853,058 853,058 0 853,058

Parks and Recreation 33,741,353 9,597 33,750,950 32,545,326 0 32,545,326


26,166,365 1,724,000 27,890,365 22,570,525 0 22,570,525

Public Works 211,247,760 1,322,892 212,570,652 191,873,041 (121,155) 191,751,886

Total $ 387,941,520 $ 3,381,489 $ 391,323,009 $ 359,021,925 $ 203,845 $ 359,225,770

52



Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




10.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 10.00

Total 10.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 10.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 6,840,090 $ 0 $ 6,840,090 $ 4,641,447 $ 0 $ 4,641,447

Total $ 6,840,090 $ 0 $ 6,840,090 $ 4,641,447 $ 0 $ 4,641,447


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 6,840,090 $ 0 $ 6,840,090 $ 4,641,447 $ 0 $ 4,641,447


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 800,000 $ 0 $ 800,000 $ 600,000 $ 0 $ 600,000



3,685,090 0 3,685,090 4,041,447 0 4,041,447

Total $ 6,840,090 $ 0 $ 6,840,090 $ 4,641,447 $ 0 $ 4,641,447


Agriculture, Weights & Measures

Fiscal Year 2012-13Proposes an increase of 3.00 staff years for the Agriculture Standards program based on $0.325 million in revenuefrom Unclaimed Gas Tax ($0.1), Shipping Licenses and Permits for Phytosanitary certificate fees ($0.1 million), StateAid-Pesticide Enforcement ($0.05 million) and fines and forfeitures ($0.075 million).These positions will perform standardization inspections of produce with regard to quality, labeling and otherrequirements; work in conjunction with the Sheriff’s Department on agricultural theft issues; and work with the U.S.Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services and other agencies on various inspection management and enforcementissues.

Fiscal Year 2013-14 Proposes an increase of 3.00 staff years for the Agriculture Standards program as previously described in Fiscal Year2012-13.

Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




150.00 3.00 153.00 150.00 3.00 153.00

Total 150.00 3.00 153.00 150.00 3.00 153.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 18,676,994 $ 325,000 $ 19,001,994 $ 18,357,640 $ 325,000 $ 18,682,640

Fish and Wildlife Fund 18,000 0 18,000 18,000 0 18,000

Total $ 18,694,994 $ 325,000 $ 19,019,994 $ 18,375,640 $ 325,000 $ 18,700,640

54




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Salaries & Benefits $ 14,706,498 $ 325,000 $ 15,031,498 $ 15,222,676 $ 325,000 $ 15,547,676


Other Charges 22,000 0 22,000 22,000 0 22,000


10,825 0 10,825 825 0 825

Total $ 18,694,994 $ 325,000 $ 19,019,994 $ 18,375,640 $ 325,000 $ 18,700,640


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 3,587,000 $ 100,000 $ 3,687,000 $ 3,587,000 $ 100,000 $ 3,687,000


16,000 75,000 91,000 16,000 75,000 91,000


8,995,715 150,000 9,145,715 8,995,715 150,000 9,145,715


399,258 0 399,258 399,258 0 399,258


47,850 0 47,850 47,850 0 47,850



5,239,171 0 5,239,171 5,327,817 0 5,327,817

Total $ 18,694,994 $ 325,000 $ 19,019,994 $ 18,375,640 $ 325,000 $ 18,700,640




Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Air Pollution Control District Programs

146.00 0.00 146.00 146.00 0.00 146.00

Total 146.00 0.00 146.00 146.00 0.00 146.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Air Pollution Control District Programs

$ 44,274,271 $ 0 $ 44,274,271 $ 45,179,512 $ 0 $ 45,179,512

Total $ 44,274,271 $ 0 $ 44,274,271 $ 45,179,512 $ 0 $ 45,179,512


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 15,525,013 0 15,525,013 15,172,578 0 15,172,578


390,000 0 390,000 390,000 0 390,000


300,000 0 300,000 300,000 0 300,000


8,136,227 0 8,136,227 8,488,662 0 8,488,662

Total $ 44,274,271 $ 0 $ 44,274,271 $ 45,179,512 $ 0 $ 45,179,512

56




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 7,208,605 $ 0 $ 7,208,605 $ 7,753,723 $ 0 $ 7,753,723


980,000 0 980,000 980,000 0 980,000


30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 30,000


25,794,480 0 25,794,480 25,794,480 0 25,794,480


581,278 0 581,278 588,966 0 588,966


8,136,227 0 8,136,227 8,488,662 0 8,488,662


Total $ 44,274,271 $ 0 $ 44,274,271 $ 45,179,512 $ 0 $ 45,179,512


Environmental Health

Fiscal Year 2012-13Proposes a decrease of 1.00 staff year in the Land and Water Quality Program as a result of a reduction in Land Useproject submittals due to the downturn in economy. The negative salary adjustment for this position was included inthe CAO Proposed Operational Plan.

Fiscal Year 2013-14Proposes a decrease of 1.00 staff year in the Land and Water Quality Program as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Environmental Health 282.00 (1.00) 281.00 282.00 (1.00) 281.00

Total 282.00 (1.00) 281.00 282.00 (1.00) 281.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Environmental Health $ 46,123,629 $ 0 $ 46,123,629 $ 42,983,376 $ 0 $ 42,983,376

Total $ 46,123,629 $ 0 $ 46,123,629 $ 42,983,376 $ 0 $ 42,983,376

58




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






51,308 0 51,308 20,000 0 20,000

Total $ 46,123,629 $ 0 $ 46,123,629 $ 42,983,376 $ 0 $ 42,983,376


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 20,127,024 $ 0 $ 20,127,024 $ 20,131,117 $ 0 $ 20,131,117


318,094 0 318,094 318,094 0 318,094


4,177,535 0 4,177,535 3,828,356 0 3,828,356


17,405,164 0 17,405,164 17,661,208 0 17,661,208


2,709,946 0 2,709,946 1,044,601 0 1,044,601


544,380 0 544,380 0 0 0


Total $ 46,123,629 $ 0 $ 46,123,629 $ 42,983,376 $ 0 $ 42,983,376


Farm & Home Advisor

No changes from the CAO Operational Plan.

Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00

Total 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058 $ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058

Total $ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058 $ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058 $ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058

60




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058 $ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058

Total $ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058 $ 853,058 $ 0 $ 853,058


Parks and Recreation

Fiscal Year 2012-13Proposes an increase of $0.01 million as a result of a grant from the San Diego County Indian Gaming LocalCommunity Benefit Committee on April 20, 2012. Funding will be used to mitigate the increased park operational andmaintenance expenses at Louis Stelzer County Park.

Fiscal Year 2013-14


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Parks and Recreation 175.00 0.00 175.00 175.00 0.00 175.00

Total 175.00 0.00 175.00 175.00 0.00 175.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Parks and Recreation $ 29,489,776 $ 9,597 $ 29,499,373 $ 28,280,195 $ 0 $ 28,280,195

Park Land Dedication 714,728 0 714,728 713,728 0 713,728

Park Special Districts 3,536,849 0 3,536,849 3,551,403 0 3,551,403

Total $ 33,741,353 $ 9,597 $ 33,750,950 $ 32,545,326 $ 0 $ 32,545,326

62




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




Services & Supplies 13,402,811 9,597 13,412,408 11,612,319 0 11,612,319

Other Charges 80,000 0 80,000 80,000 0 80,000


145,000 0 145,000 145,000 0 145,000


1,915,245 0 1,915,245 1,959,261 0 1,959,261

Total $ 33,741,353 $ 9,597 $ 33,750,950 $ 32,545,326 $ 0 $ 32,545,326


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





10,479 0 10,479 10,479 0 10,479


657,978 0 657,978 657,978 0 657,978


930,217 0 930,217 930,217 0 930,217


592,791 9,597 602,388 554,499 0 554,499


5,110,890 0 5,110,890 5,168,510 0 5,168,510


139,000 0 139,000 120,000 0 120,000


1,915,245 0 1,915,245 1,959,261 0 1,959,261



20,430,868 0 20,430,868 21,233,999 0 21,233,999

Total $ 33,741,353 $ 9,597 $ 33,750,950 $ 32,545,326 $ 0 $ 32,545,326



Fiscal Year 2012-13Proposes a decrease of 1.00 staff year in Project Planning due to reduced workload based on current economicconditions. Proposes the rebudget of $1.15 million for the Business Case Management System (Accela) funding based on LandUse and Environment Group fund balance. This project will integrate permit activity, time keeping and financialmanagement for land development projects and will be implemented in Fiscal Year 2012-13. Proposes an increase of $0.5 million for the Continuous Improvement Program to improve land development servicesfunded by General Fund fund balance as approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 9, 2012 (2).Proposes an increase of $0.04 million for the creation and implementation of a training program for the CommunityPlanning and Sponsor Group members as approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 28, 2012 (5).

Fiscal Year 2013-14Proposes a decrease of 1.00 staff year in Project Planning as previously described in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Support Services 13.00 0.00 13.00 13.00 0.00 13.00

Advance Planning 11.00 0.00 11.00 11.00 0.00 11.00

Regulatory Planning 65.00 (1.00) 64.00 65.00 (1.00) 64.00

Building 40.00 0.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 40.00

Codes Enforcement 19.00 0.00 19.00 19.00 0.00 19.00

LUEG GIS Support 9.00 0.00 9.00 9.00 0.00 9.00

SanGIS 4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00

Total 161.00 (1.00) 160.00 161.00 (1.00) 160.00

64



Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Support Services $ 2,516,498 $ 1,684,000 $ 4,200,498 $ 2,595,280 $ 0 $ 2,595,280

Advance Planning 4,918,080 0 4,918,080 1,334,742 0 1,334,742

Regulatory Planning 8,200,259 40,000 8,240,259 8,474,039 0 8,474,039

Building 5,693,702 0 5,693,702 5,344,399 0 5,344,399

Codes Enforcement 2,602,202 0 2,602,202 2,509,465 0 2,509,465

LUEG GIS Support 1,406,307 0 1,406,307 1,466,908 0 1,466,908

SanGIS 829,317 0 829,317 845,692 0 845,692

Total $ 26,166,365 $ 1,724,000 $ 27,890,365 $ 22,570,525 $ 0 $ 22,570,525


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




Services & Supplies 8,861,390 1,724,000 10,585,390 5,084,417 0 5,084,417


(182,991) 0 (182,991) (156,514) 0 (156,514)

Total $ 26,166,365 $ 1,724,000 $ 27,890,365 $ 22,570,525 $ 0 $ 22,570,525


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 2,342,647 $ 0 $ 2,342,647 $ 4,077,473 $ 0 $ 4,077,473


570,000 0 570,000 500,000 0 500,000


1,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 1,000


542,767 0 542,767 559,142 0 559,142


8,623,091 0 8,623,091 9,612,742 0 9,612,742

Use of Fund Balance 6,779,887 1,724,000 8,503,887 179,887 0 179,887


7,306,973 0 7,306,973 7,640,281 0 7,640,281

Total $ 26,166,365 $ 1,724,000 $ 27,890,365 $ 22,570,525 $ 0 $ 22,570,525


Public Works

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Engineering Services Program - Road FundProposes a decrease of 1.00 staff year in the Road Fund Engineering Services Program and $0.1 million in revenuedue to a decrease in workload. Proposes a technical adjustment for an increase of $0.8 million in the Road Fund Detailed Work Program based onRoad Fund fund balance for the purchase of right-of-way for the San Vicente Road project in the community ofRamona. Proposes an increase of $0.4 million in the Road Fund Detailed Work Program for the Dehesa Road RubberizedAsphalt project based on grant funding from the San Diego County Indian Gaming Local Community BenefitCommittee. This project will enhance the bearing capacity of the road, reduce routine maintenance needs on the roadand reduce the roadway noise. This project benefits the patrons of the Sycuan Casino, the Sycuan Indian Reservationand the communities of Dehesa, Harbison Canyon and residents in this rural area. Approval of grant funding wasreceived late in Fiscal Year 2011-12 after the CAO Proposed was approved.Proposes an increase of $0.17 million in the Road Fund Detailed Work Program for the Wildcat Canyon RoadRubberized Asphalt project based on grant funding from the San Diego County Indian Gaming Local CommunityBenefit Committee. This project will enhance the bearing capacity of the road, reduce routine maintenance needs onthe road and reduce the roadway noise. This project benefits the Barona Indian Reservation, the communities ofRamona and Lakeside and the residents in this rural area. Approval of grant funding was received late in Fiscal Year2011-12 after the CAO Proposed was approved.

General Fund Activities ProgramProposes a rebudget of $0.007 million in the Residential Integrated Pest Management-National Pollutant DischargeElimination System project funds based on Land Use and Environment Group fund balance due to a delay in theaward of the grant by the State. The use of project funds is for a grant match to help support an education efforttargeted at reducing the public’s use of pesticides and sustain the “Healthy Garden, Healthy Home” Program byproviding funds to the University of California Cooperative Extension for community workshops and plant nursery stafftraining. Grant funds are pending from the State.Proposes a decrease of $0.006 million for the Business Case Management System (Accela) project due toexpenditures being incurred late in the current fiscal year rather than in the Fiscal Year 2012-13 as budgeted. Thisproject involves implementing new software and process solutions to upgrade permit and land developmentprocessing.

Permanent Road DivisionsProposes a technical adjustment for an increase of $656 in the Permanent Road Division 1001 Capra Way forcustomer refunds based on fund balance.Proposes a technical adjustment for an increase of $0.005 million in the Permanent Road Division 1007 Tumble Creekfor customer refunds based on fund balance.

66



Fiscal Year 2013-14Proposes a decrease of 1.00 staff year in the Road Fund Engineering Services Program and $0.1 million in revenue aspreviously described in Fiscal Year 2012-13 – Engineering Services Program – Road Fund.

Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Transportation Program

201.00 0.00 201.00 201.00 0.00 201.00

Land Development Program

83.00 0.00 83.00 83.00 0.00 83.00

Engineering Services Program

72.00 (1.00) 71.00 72.00 (1.00) 71.00

Solid Waste Management Program

17.00 0.00 17.00 17.00 0.00 17.00

Management Services Program

50.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 50.00

General Fund Activities Program

28.00 0.00 28.00 28.00 0.00 28.00

Airports Program 35.00 0.00 35.00 35.00 0.00 35.00

Wastewater Management Program

39.00 0.00 39.00 39.00 0.00 39.00

Total 525.00 (1.00) 524.00 525.00 (1.00) 524.00



Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Transportation Program

$ 37,250,443 $ 0 $ 37,250,443 $ 37,649,686 $ 0 $ 37,649,686

Land Development Program

14,564,165 0 14,564,165 14,781,945 0 14,781,945

Engineering Services Program

29,351,715 1,263,542 30,615,257 25,721,322 (121,155) 25,600,167

Solid Waste Management Program

6,321,657 0 6,321,657 6,376,448 0 6,376,448

Management Services Program

13,220,980 0 13,220,980 11,348,031 0 11,348,031

General Fund Activities Program

14,110,152 53,936 14,164,088 9,512,831 0 9,512,831

Airports Program 18,360,708 0 18,360,708 15,845,905 0 15,845,905

Wastewater Management Program

7,064,485 0 7,064,485 6,937,724 0 6,937,724

Sanitation Districts 40,219,977 0 40,219,977 31,152,810 0 31,152,810

Flood Control 7,470,592 0 7,470,592 9,233,453 0 9,233,453

County Service Areas 472,690 0 472,690 472,690 0 472,690

Street Lighting District 1,990,079 0 1,990,079 1,990,079 0 1,990,079

Permanent Road Divisions

7,825,608 5,414 7,831,022 7,825,608 0 7,825,608

Equipment ISF Program

13,024,509 0 13,024,509 13,024,509 0 13,024,509

Total $ 211,247,760 $ 1,322,892 $ 212,570,652 $ 191,873,041 $ (121,155) $ 191,751,886


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Salaries & Benefits $ 61,662,365 $ (117,915) $ 61,544,450 $ 63,509,084 $ (121,155) $ 63,387,929


Other Charges 11,173,499 810,000 11,983,499 11,456,595 0 11,456,595


6,717,800 0 6,717,800 7,590,000 0 7,590,000


4,704,000 0 4,704,000 4,408,000 0 4,408,000


11,465,898 0 11,465,898 0 0 0


2,989,862 0 2,989,862 697,258 0 697,258

Total $ 211,247,760 $ 1,322,892 $ 212,570,652 $ 191,873,041 $ (121,155) $ 191,751,886

68




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





4,294,088 0 4,294,088 4,294,463 0 4,294,463


207,388 0 207,388 203,388 0 203,388


20,408,289 0 20,408,289 20,416,379 0 20,416,379


69,571,915 571,457 70,143,372 68,197,821 0 68,197,821


55,284,421 (117,915) 55,166,506 56,747,682 (121,155) 56,626,527


2,130,098 0 2,130,098 1,629,098 0 1,629,098


2,989,862 0 2,989,862 697,258 0 697,258

Use of Fund Balance 45,044,552 869,350 45,913,902 28,178,330 0 28,178,330


6,088,699 0 6,088,699 6,280,174 0 6,280,174

Total $ 211,247,760 $ 1,322,892 $ 212,570,652 $ 191,873,041 $ (121,155) $ 191,751,886

69Community Services Group Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Community Services Group Changes

Community Services Group Summary


The Community Services Group staffing level in the revised Proposed Operational Plan is 959.00 staff years in Fiscal Year2012-13 and 955.00 in Fiscal Year 2013-14. This is a decrease of 1.75 staff years or -0.2% in each year from the CAOProposed Operational Plan and a proposed decrease of 4.50 staff years or -0.5% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 AdoptedBudget.

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Significant proposed staffing changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include a decreaseof 1.75 staff years ($0.1 million) in the County Library. This is a technical adjustment to align prior years’ position deletions.

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed staffing changes for Fiscal Year 2013-14 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include a decrease of 1.75staff years as described above for Fiscal Year 2012-13.


The Community Services Group expenditures in the revised Proposed Operational Plan are $305.5 million for Fiscal Year2012-13 and $293.1 million for Fiscal Year 2013-14. This is an increase of $2.8 million or 0.1% in Fiscal Year 2012-13 overthe CAO Proposed Operational Plan, for a total increase of $16.4 million or 5.7% over the Fiscal Year 2011-12 AdoptedBudget.

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:Increase of $2.0 million in appropriations and revenue in Housing and Community Development based on the newlyawarded grants from the State Department of Housing and Community Development to assist first-time low-incomehomebuyers and to provide rental assistance to homeless persons.Cancellation of $0.3 million in appropriations in Housing and Community Development due to duplicate budgeting inanother department.Increase of $0.4 million in the Department of Animal Services for the Interactive Voice Response telephonic system($0.3 million rebudgeted and $0.1 million in new funding).

70


Community Services Group Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Rebudget of funding for multi-year Information Technology projects in the Department of Purchasing and Contractingfor Web-based paperless contract publishing ($0.2 million) and upgrade to Buynet, the County’s online procurementsystem ($0.1 million).Rebudgets in Housing and Community Development to utilize program revenue that is not expected to be expendedduring Fiscal Year 2011-12, including $0.3 million in Community Development Block Grants and $0.2 million inHousing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS.

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Significant proposed changes for Fiscal Year 2013-14 from the CAO Proposed Operational Plan include:Increase of $0.5 million in Housing and Community Development based on newly awarded grants as described abovein Fiscal Year 2012-13.Cancellation of $0.3 million in appropriations as described above in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

Executive Office





Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Community Services Executive Office

8.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 8.00

Animal Services 123.00 0.00 123.00 123.00 0.00 123.00

County Library 271.75 (1.75) 270.00 267.75 (1.75) 266.00

General Services 336.00 0.00 336.00 336.00 0.00 336.00

Housing & Community Development

102.00 0.00 102.00 102.00 0.00 102.00

Purchasing and Contracting

56.00 0.00 56.00 56.00 0.00 56.00

Registrar of Voters 64.00 0.00 64.00 64.00 0.00 64.00

Total 960.75 (1.75) 959.00 956.75 (1.75) 955.00


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 6,725,231 $ 0 $ 6,725,231 $ 5,941,679 $ 0 $ 5,941,679

Animal Services 15,452,397 370,000 15,822,397 15,612,937 0 15,612,937

County Library 33,492,475 (76,527) 33,415,948 33,799,477 (78,501) 33,720,976

General Services 174,595,980 0 174,595,980 176,365,652 0 176,365,652


22,200,684 2,256,256 24,456,940 20,139,459 234,646 20,374,105


19,711,659 303,929 20,015,588 11,678,745 0 11,678,745

County Successor Agency

9,410,160 0 9,410,160 9,604,645 0 9,604,645

Registrar of Voters 21,094,756 0 21,094,756 19,826,771 0 19,826,771

Total $ 302,683,342 $ 2,853,658 $ 305,537,000 $ 292,969,365 $ 156,145 $ 293,125,510

72



Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




8.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 8.00

Total 8.00 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 8.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 6,725,231 $ 0 $ 6,725,231 $ 5,941,679 $ 0 $ 5,941,679

Total $ 6,725,231 $ 0 $ 6,725,231 $ 5,941,679 $ 0 $ 5,941,679


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






650,000 0 650,000 0 0 0


Total $ 6,725,231 $ 0 $ 6,725,231 $ 5,941,679 $ 0 $ 5,941,679


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 791,836 $ 0 $ 791,836 $ 791,836 $ 0 $ 791,836



1,883,395 0 1,883,395 1,899,843 0 1,899,843

Total $ 6,725,231 $ 0 $ 6,725,231 $ 5,941,679 $ 0 $ 5,941,679


Animal Services

Fiscal Year 2012-13Proposes the following increases using Community Services Group Fund Balance:

$0.3 million for replacement of the department’s Integrated Voice Recognition (IVR) telephonic system for use in thedepartment’s customer service phone center. This system allows customers to call the department and accessspecific information through a menu system when staff is not available to take calls.$0.1 million in additional funding for the IVR due to project cost escalation.

Fiscal Year 2013-14


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Animal Services 123.00 0.00 123.00 123.00 0.00 123.00

Total 123.00 0.00 123.00 123.00 0.00 123.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Animal Services $ 15,452,397 $ 370,000 $ 15,822,397 $ 15,612,937 $ 0 $ 15,612,937

Total $ 15,452,397 $ 370,000 $ 15,822,397 $ 15,612,937 $ 0 $ 15,612,937

74




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






170,000 0 170,000 0 0 0

Total $ 15,452,397 $ 370,000 $ 15,822,397 $ 15,612,937 $ 0 $ 15,612,937


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 2,170,204 $ 0 $ 2,170,204 $ 2,170,204 $ 0 $ 2,170,204


3,000 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000


66,061 0 66,061 66,061 0 66,061


10,164,661 0 10,164,661 10,407,672 0 10,407,672


46,000 0 46,000 46,000 0 46,000

Use of Fund Balance 232,471 370,000 602,471 0 0 0


2,770,000 0 2,770,000 2,920,000 0 2,920,000

Total $ 15,452,397 $ 370,000 $ 15,822,397 $ 15,612,937 $ 0 $ 15,612,937


County Library

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Library Branch OperationsProposes the reduction of 1.75 staff years and $0.1 million in Fund Balance to align total staffing levels for Fiscal Years2011-12 and 2012-13 in Library Branch Operations. This is a technical adjustment to correct prior year processing ofstaff year reductions.

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Library Branch OperationsProposes the reduction of 1.75 staff years and $0.1 million in Fund Balance for the reason stated above.

Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Library Operations and Administration

19.75 0.00 19.75 16.75 0.00 16.75

Library Professional & Technical Support Service

38.25 0.00 38.25 38.25 0.00 38.25

Library Branch Operations

213.75 (1.75) 212.00 212.75 (1.75) 211.00

Total 271.75 (1.75) 270.00 267.75 (1.75) 266.00

76



Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Library Operations and Administration

$ 5,115,919 $ 0 $ 5,115,919 $ 4,933,989 $ 0 $ 4,933,989

Library Professional & Technical Support Service

6,660,932 0 6,660,932 6,758,108 0 6,758,108

Library Branch Operations

21,715,624 (76,527) 21,639,097 22,107,380 (78,501) 22,028,879

Total $ 33,492,475 $ (76,527) $ 33,415,948 $ 33,799,477 $ (78,501) $ 33,720,976


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






45,000 0 45,000 0 0 0


Total $ 33,492,475 $ (76,527) $ 33,415,948 $ 33,799,477 $ (78,501) $ 33,720,976


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





375,000 0 375,000 375,000 0 375,000


105,000 0 105,000 105,000 0 105,000


1,212,569 0 1,212,569 1,212,569 0 1,212,569


1,288,112 0 1,288,112 1,288,112 0 1,288,112


553,821 0 553,821 553,821 0 553,821

Use of Fund Balance 2,047,976 (76,527) 1,971,449 2,354,978 (78,501) 2,276,477

Total $ 33,492,475 $ (76,527) $ 33,415,948 $ 33,799,477 $ (78,501) $ 33,720,976


General Services


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Facilities Management Internal Service Fund

278.00 0.00 278.00 278.00 0.00 278.00

Fleet Management Internal Service Fund

58.00 0.00 58.00 58.00 0.00 58.00

Total 336.00 0.00 336.00 336.00 0.00 336.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Facilities Management Internal Service Fund

$ 126,228,747 $ 0 $ 126,228,747 $ 128,149,171 $ 0 $ 128,149,171

Fleet Management Internal Service Fund

46,582,233 0 46,582,233 46,591,481 0 46,591,481

General Fund Contribution to GS ISF's

1,785,000 0 1,785,000 1,625,000 0 1,625,000

Total $ 174,595,980 $ 0 $ 174,595,980 $ 176,365,652 $ 0 $ 176,365,652

78




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 11,082,221 0 11,082,221 11,082,221 0 11,082,221


9,985,581 0 9,985,581 9,585,581 0 9,585,581

Contingency Reserves 103,000 0 103,000 103,000 0 103,000


10,008,187 0 10,008,187 10,286,638 0 10,286,638

Total $ 174,595,980 $ 0 $ 174,595,980 $ 176,365,652 $ 0 $ 176,365,652


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 2,785,757 $ 0 $ 2,785,757 $ 2,785,757 $ 0 $ 2,785,757


3,364,973 0 3,364,973 3,364,973 0 3,364,973


141,889,937 0 141,889,937 143,350,915 0 143,350,915


1,078,186 0 1,078,186 1,078,186 0 1,078,186


15,458,187 0 15,458,187 15,686,638 0 15,686,638



1,535,000 0 1,535,000 1,625,000 0 1,625,000

Total $ 174,595,980 $ 0 $ 174,595,980 $ 176,365,652 $ 0 $ 176,365,652


Housing and Community Development

Fiscal Year 2012-13

HCD – Multi-Year ProjectsProposes an increase of $2.0 million in appropriations and revenue based on newly awarded grants as follows:

From the State Department of Housing and Community Development, $1.5 million applied for in Fiscal Year 2011-12. CalHome grant revenue will be used as supplemental funding to augment the U.S. Department of Housing &Urban Development (HUD) HOME grant allocated for the Downpayment and Closing Cost Assistance program foreligible first-time low-income homebuyers.From the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department Shelter Plus Care grant revenue of $0.5 million toprovide sponsor-based rental assistance to homeless persons primarily who are seriously mentally ill; have chronicproblems with alcohol, drugs, or both; or have AIDS and related diseases.

Cancel appropriations of $0.3 million and the related Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) grantrevenue. The Fiscal Year 2012-13 grant funds allocated to the County Health & Human Services (HHSA) HIV/AIDS,STD and Hepatitis Program are already included in HHSA’s Fiscal Year 2012-13 CAO Proposed Budget. The HOPWAprogram is sponsored by HUD. The program provides local governments with the resources and incentives to deviselong-term comprehensive strategies for meeting the housing need of persons with HIV/AIDS and their families. TheIntensive Case Management Program is operated by the County of San Diego HIV, STD and Hepatitis Branch of PublicHealth Services.Proposes the rebudget of $0.5 million for the following:

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG - $0.3 million) – based on remaining available prior year CDBGentitlement grant funds allocated to Urban County Residential Rehabilitation Program. This program provides homerepair loans or grants to eligible low-income homeowners for critical health and safety improvements, accessibilityimprovements and other necessary housing rehabilitations.HOPWA ($0.2 million) – based on remaining Fiscal Year 2011-12 grant funds, to provide funding for a residential carefacility for the chronically ill who need 24-hour comprehensive care.

Fiscal Year 2013-14

HCD – Multi-Year ProjectsProposes the decrease of $0.3 million in appropriations and revenue related to the HOPWA project described above.Proposes the increase of $0.5 million in appropriations and revenue related to Shelter Plus Care Program describedabove.

80



Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




102.00 0.00 102.00 102.00 0.00 102.00

Total 102.00 0.00 102.00 102.00 0.00 102.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 11,718,925 $ 0 $ 11,718,925 $ 11,527,501 $ 0 $ 11,527,501

County Successor Agency - Housing

105,000 0 105,000 105,000 0 105,000

HCD - Multi-Year Projects

10,376,759 2,256,256 12,633,015 8,506,958 234,646 8,741,604

Total $ 22,200,684 $ 2,256,256 $ 24,456,940 $ 20,139,459 $ 234,646 $ 20,374,105


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




Services & Supplies 9,053,619 756,256 9,809,875 6,674,194 234,646 6,908,840

Other Charges 4,089,817 1,500,000 5,589,817 4,089,817 0 4,089,817


(83,000) 0 (83,000) (83,000) 0 (83,000)

Total $ 22,200,684 $ 2,256,256 $ 24,456,940 $ 20,139,459 $ 234,646 $ 20,374,105


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 21,549,063 $ 2,256,256 $ 23,805,319 $ 19,820,838 $ 234,646 $ 20,055,484


100 0 100 100 0 100


585,000 0 585,000 585,000 0 585,000



(371,479) 0 (371,479) (371,479) 0 (371,479)

Total $ 22,200,684 $ 2,256,256 $ 24,456,940 $ 20,139,459 $ 234,646 $ 20,374,105



Fiscal Year 2012-13

Purchasing ISFProposes the rebudget of $0.3 million for one-time projects:

$0.1 million for an upgrade to Buynet, the County’s procurement system, funded by Charges for Current Services.$0.2 million for Web-based paperless contract publishing, funded by Operating Transfer from the General Fund.

Fiscal Year 2013-14


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Content/Records Services

6.00 0.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00

Purchasing ISF 50.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 50.00

Total 56.00 0.00 56.00 56.00 0.00 56.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Content/Records Services

$ 6,238,755 $ 0 $ 6,238,755 $ 2,158,796 $ 0 $ 2,158,796

Purchasing ISF 7,477,904 303,929 7,781,833 7,454,949 0 7,454,949

General Fund Contribution

5,995,000 0 5,995,000 2,065,000 0 2,065,000

Total $ 19,711,659 $ 303,929 $ 20,015,588 $ 11,678,745 $ 0 $ 11,678,745

82




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 102,298 0 102,298 22,339 0 22,339


5,995,000 0 5,995,000 2,065,000 0 2,065,000

Total $ 19,711,659 $ 303,929 $ 20,015,588 $ 11,678,745 $ 0 $ 11,678,745


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 7,000 $ 0 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 0 $ 7,000


7,222,601 70,744 7,293,345 7,129,646 0 7,129,646


412,099 0 412,099 412,099 0 412,099


5,995,000 233,185 6,228,185 2,065,000 0 2,065,000



1,995,000 0 1,995,000 2,065,000 0 2,065,000

Total $ 19,711,659 $ 303,929 $ 20,015,588 $ 11,678,745 $ 0 $ 11,678,745


County of San Diego Redevelopment Agency and Successor Agency


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



County of San Diego Redevelopment Agency

Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

84



County Successor AgencyStaffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



County Successor Agency

$ 9,410,160 $ 0 $ 9,410,160 $ 9,604,645 $ 0 $ 9,604,645

Total $ 9,410,160 $ 0 $ 9,410,160 $ 9,604,645 $ 0 $ 9,604,645


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Services & Supplies $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 250,000

Other Charges 2,583,056 0 2,583,056 2,214,929 0 2,214,929


6,577,104 0 6,577,104 7,139,716 0 7,139,716

Total $ 9,410,160 $ 0 $ 9,410,160 $ 9,604,645 $ 0 $ 9,604,645


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 2,244,276 $ 0 $ 2,244,276 $ 2,344,929 $ 0 $ 2,344,929


588,780 0 588,780 120,000 0 120,000


6,577,104 0 6,577,104 7,139,716 0 7,139,716

Total $ 9,410,160 $ 0 $ 9,410,160 $ 9,604,645 $ 0 $ 9,604,645


Registrar of Voters


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Registrar of Voters 64.00 0.00 64.00 64.00 0.00 64.00

Total 64.00 0.00 64.00 64.00 0.00 64.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Registrar of Voters $ 21,094,756 $ 0 $ 21,094,756 $ 19,826,771 $ 0 $ 19,826,771

Total $ 21,094,756 $ 0 $ 21,094,756 $ 19,826,771 $ 0 $ 19,826,771


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






2,000,000 0 2,000,000 0 0 0

Total $ 21,094,756 $ 0 $ 21,094,756 $ 19,826,771 $ 0 $ 19,826,771

86




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 287,756 $ 0 $ 287,756 $ 3,030,000 $ 0 $ 3,030,000


5,005,000 0 5,005,000 1,480,000 0 1,480,000


80,000 0 80,000 70,000 0 70,000


0 0 0 1,260,319 0 1,260,319



11,522,000 0 11,522,000 11,697,000 0 11,697,000

Total $ 21,094,756 $ 0 $ 21,094,756 $ 19,826,771 $ 0 $ 19,826,771

87Finance and General Government Group Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Finance and General Government Group Changes

Finance and General Government Group Summary


The Finance and General Government Group staffing level in the revised Proposed Operational Plan is 1,174.50 staff yearsfor Fiscal Year 2012-13 and 1,174.50 for Fiscal Year 2013-14. This is unchanged from the staff years in the CAO ProposedOperational Plan, which proposed a net increase of 8.00 staff years or 0.7% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Adopted Budget.


The Finance and General Government Group appropriations in the revised Proposed Operational Plan are $340.8 million forFiscal Year 2012-13 and $319.9 million for Fiscal Year 2013-14. Total expenditure appropriations in Fiscal Year 2012-13 areunchanged from the appropriations included in the CAO Proposed Operational Plan, which proposed a net decrease of$22.4 million or -6.2% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Adopted Budget.

Executive Office


88


Finance and General Government Group ChangesCAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Finance & General Government Executive Office

7.00 0.00 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00

Board of Supervisors 56.00 0.00 56.00 56.00 0.00 56.00

Assessor / Recorder / County Clerk

410.50 0.00 410.50 410.50 0.00 410.50

Treasurer - Tax Collector

121.00 0.00 121.00 121.00 0.00 121.00

Chief Administrative Office

14.50 0.00 14.50 14.50 0.00 14.50

Auditor and Controller

246.50 0.00 246.50 246.50 0.00 246.50

County Technology Office

16.00 0.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 16.00

Civil Service Commission

4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

27.00 0.00 27.00 27.00 0.00 27.00

County Counsel 135.00 0.00 135.00 135.00 0.00 135.00

Grand Jury 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

Human Resources 114.00 0.00 114.00 114.00 0.00 114.00

County Communications Office

22.00 0.00 22.00 22.00 0.00 22.00

Total 1,174.50 0.00 1,174.50 1,174.50 0.00 1,174.50




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 10,174,656 $ 0 $ 10,174,656 $ 7,692,754 $ 0 $ 7,692,754

Board of Supervisors 7,811,230 0 7,811,230 7,816,168 0 7,816,168

Assessor / Recorder / County Clerk

56,359,869 0 56,359,869 56,039,243 0 56,039,243

Treasurer - Tax Collector

20,475,327 0 20,475,327 20,689,825 0 20,689,825


4,312,234 0 4,312,234 4,385,417 0 4,385,417


36,752,555 0 36,752,555 35,157,520 0 35,157,520


151,131,040 0 151,131,040 134,139,742 0 134,139,742


586,695 0 586,695 601,143 0 601,143


3,279,610 0 3,279,610 3,366,032 0 3,366,032

County Counsel 22,935,440 0 22,935,440 23,031,595 0 23,031,595

Grand Jury 588,080 0 588,080 591,003 0 591,003

Human Resources 23,323,953 0 23,323,953 23,241,768 0 23,241,768


3,060,557 0 3,060,557 3,116,675 0 3,116,675

Total $ 340,791,246 $ 0 $ 340,791,246 $ 319,868,885 $ 0 $ 319,868,885

90



Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




7.00 0.00 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00

Total 7.00 0.00 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 10,174,656 $ 0 $ 10,174,656 $ 7,692,754 $ 0 $ 7,692,754

Total $ 10,174,656 $ 0 $ 10,174,656 $ 7,692,754 $ 0 $ 7,692,754


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Management Reserves 2,500,000 0 2,500,000 0 0 0

Total $ 10,174,656 $ 0 $ 10,174,656 $ 7,692,754 $ 0 $ 7,692,754


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 20,000 $ 0 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 0 $ 20,000


19,156 0 19,156 19,156 0 19,156


537,622 0 537,622 537,622 0 537,622



6,374,188 0 6,374,188 6,411,600 0 6,411,600

Total $ 10,174,656 $ 0 $ 10,174,656 $ 7,692,754 $ 0 $ 7,692,754


Board of Supervisors


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Board of Supervisors District 1

9.00 0.00 9.00 9.00 0.00 9.00


11.00 0.00 11.00 11.00 0.00 11.00


11.00 0.00 11.00 11.00 0.00 11.00


10.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 0.00 10.00


13.00 0.00 13.00 13.00 0.00 13.00

Board of Supervisors General Offices

2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00

Total 56.00 0.00 56.00 56.00 0.00 56.00

92



Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 1,335,009 $ 0 $ 1,335,009 $ 1,335,009 $ 0 $ 1,335,009


1,338,378 0 1,338,378 1,338,378 0 1,338,378


1,311,100 0 1,311,100 1,311,100 0 1,311,100


1,308,868 0 1,308,868 1,308,868 0 1,308,868


1,436,783 0 1,436,783 1,436,783 0 1,436,783

Board of Supervisors General Offices

1,081,092 0 1,081,092 1,086,030 0 1,086,030

Total $ 7,811,230 $ 0 $ 7,811,230 $ 7,816,168 $ 0 $ 7,816,168


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 7,811,230 $ 0 $ 7,811,230 $ 7,816,168 $ 0 $ 7,816,168


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 7,811,230 $ 0 $ 7,811,230 $ 7,816,168 $ 0 $ 7,816,168

Total $ 7,811,230 $ 0 $ 7,811,230 $ 7,816,168 $ 0 $ 7,816,168


Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Property Valuation ID 272.00 0.00 272.00 272.00 0.00 272.00

Recorder / County Clerk

114.50 0.00 114.50 114.50 0.00 114.50

Management Support 24.00 0.00 24.00 24.00 0.00 24.00

Total 410.50 0.00 410.50 410.50 0.00 410.50

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Property Valuation ID $ 33,296,297 $ 0 $ 33,296,297 $ 34,676,895 $ 0 $ 34,676,895

Recorder / County Clerk

19,671,169 0 19,671,169 17,963,475 0 17,963,475

Management Support 3,392,403 0 3,392,403 3,398,873 0 3,398,873

Total $ 56,359,869 $ 0 $ 56,359,869 $ 56,039,243 $ 0 $ 56,039,243


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






207,763 0 207,763 40,000 0 40,000

Total $ 56,359,869 $ 0 $ 56,359,869 $ 56,039,243 $ 0 $ 56,039,243

94




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 900,000 $ 0 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 0 $ 900,000


30,000 0 30,000 30,000 0 30,000


33,711,529 0 33,711,529 31,644,965 0 31,644,965


701,000 0 701,000 701,000 0 701,000



20,667,340 0 20,667,340 21,963,278 0 21,963,278

Total $ 56,359,869 $ 0 $ 56,359,869 $ 56,039,243 $ 0 $ 56,039,243


Treasurer-Tax Collector


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Treasury 23.00 0.00 23.00 23.00 0.00 23.00

Deferred Compensation

3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00

Tax Collection 82.00 0.00 82.00 82.00 0.00 82.00

Administration - Treasurer / Tax Collector

13.00 0.00 13.00 13.00 0.00 13.00

Total 121.00 0.00 121.00 121.00 0.00 121.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Treasury $ 6,853,306 $ 0 $ 6,853,306 $ 6,958,201 $ 0 $ 6,958,201

Deferred Compensation

327,347 0 327,347 335,279 0 335,279

Tax Collection 10,214,869 0 10,214,869 10,255,845 0 10,255,845

Administration - Treasurer / Tax Collector

3,079,805 0 3,079,805 3,140,500 0 3,140,500

Total $ 20,475,327 $ 0 $ 20,475,327 $ 20,689,825 $ 0 $ 20,689,825

96




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 20,475,327 $ 0 $ 20,475,327 $ 20,689,825 $ 0 $ 20,689,825


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 1,035,450 $ 0 $ 1,035,450 $ 1,035,450 $ 0 $ 1,035,450


13,234,292 0 13,234,292 13,234,292 0 13,234,292


637,472 0 637,472 637,472 0 637,472


5,568,113 0 5,568,113 5,782,611 0 5,782,611

Total $ 20,475,327 $ 0 $ 20,475,327 $ 20,689,825 $ 0 $ 20,689,825




Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Executive Office 6.00 0.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00

Office of Intergovernmental Affairs

4.50 0.00 4.50 4.50 0.00 4.50

Internal Affairs 4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00

Total 14.50 0.00 14.50 14.50 0.00 14.50

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Executive Office $ 1,486,163 $ 0 $ 1,486,163 $ 1,522,650 $ 0 $ 1,522,650

Office of Intergovernmental Affairs

1,420,397 0 1,420,397 1,437,512 0 1,437,512

County Memberships and Audit

771,984 0 771,984 771,984 0 771,984

Internal Affairs 633,690 0 633,690 653,271 0 653,271

Total $ 4,312,234 $ 0 $ 4,312,234 $ 4,385,417 $ 0 $ 4,385,417


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 4,312,234 $ 0 $ 4,312,234 $ 4,385,417 $ 0 $ 4,385,417

98




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 106,812 $ 0 $ 106,812 $ 106,812 $ 0 $ 106,812


4,205,422 0 4,205,422 4,278,605 0 4,278,605

Total $ 4,312,234 $ 0 $ 4,312,234 $ 4,385,417 $ 0 $ 4,385,417




Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Audits 15.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 0.00 15.00

Office of Financial Planning

13.00 0.00 13.00 13.00 0.00 13.00

Controller Division 98.00 0.00 98.00 98.00 0.00 98.00

Revenue and Recovery 92.00 0.00 92.00 92.00 0.00 92.00

Administration 17.50 0.00 17.50 17.50 0.00 17.50

Information Technology Mgmt Services

11.00 0.00 11.00 11.00 0.00 11.00

Total 246.50 0.00 246.50 246.50 0.00 246.50

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Audits $ 2,498,477 $ 0 $ 2,498,477 $ 2,556,910 $ 0 $ 2,556,910

Office of Financial Planning

3,796,072 0 3,796,072 2,365,699 0 2,365,699

Controller Division 11,350,330 0 11,350,330 11,660,807 0 11,660,807

Revenue and Recovery 8,995,646 0 8,995,646 9,134,403 0 9,134,403

Administration 2,888,545 0 2,888,545 2,948,634 0 2,948,634

Information Technology Mgmt Services

7,223,485 0 7,223,485 6,491,067 0 6,491,067

Total $ 36,752,555 $ 0 $ 36,752,555 $ 35,157,520 $ 0 $ 35,157,520

100




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 1,000

Total $ 36,752,555 $ 0 $ 36,752,555 $ 35,157,520 $ 0 $ 35,157,520


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 70,970 $ 0 $ 70,970 $ 70,970 $ 0 $ 70,970


6,722,110 0 6,722,110 6,542,523 0 6,542,523


157,688 0 157,688 157,688 0 157,688



27,551,787 0 27,551,787 28,386,339 0 28,386,339

Total $ 36,752,555 $ 0 $ 36,752,555 $ 35,157,520 $ 0 $ 35,157,520




Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



CTO Office 16.00 0.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 16.00

Total 16.00 0.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 16.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



CTO Office $ 10,750,954 $ 0 $ 10,750,954 $ 10,113,400 $ 0 $ 10,113,400

Information Technology Internal Service Fund

140,380,086 0 140,380,086 124,026,342 0 124,026,342

Total $ 151,131,040 $ 0 $ 151,131,040 $ 134,139,742 $ 0 $ 134,139,742


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 151,131,040 $ 0 $ 151,131,040 $ 134,139,742 $ 0 $ 134,139,742

102




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 10,233 $ 0 $ 10,233 $ 10,233 $ 0 $ 10,233


136,653,629 0 136,653,629 120,114,935 0 120,114,935


100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 100,000


4,448,765 0 4,448,765 4,633,715 0 4,633,715



6,768,013 0 6,768,013 6,955,459 0 6,955,459

Total $ 151,131,040 $ 0 $ 151,131,040 $ 134,139,742 $ 0 $ 134,139,742




Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00

Total 4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 586,695 $ 0 $ 586,695 $ 601,143 $ 0 $ 601,143

Total $ 586,695 $ 0 $ 586,695 $ 601,143 $ 0 $ 601,143


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 586,695 $ 0 $ 586,695 $ 601,143 $ 0 $ 601,143

104




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 51,151 $ 0 $ 51,151 $ 51,151 $ 0 $ 51,151


535,544 0 535,544 549,992 0 549,992

Total $ 586,695 $ 0 $ 586,695 $ 601,143 $ 0 $ 601,143




Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Legislative Services 12.00 0.00 12.00 12.00 0.00 12.00

Public Services 12.00 0.00 12.00 12.00 0.00 12.00

Executive Office 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00

Total 27.00 0.00 27.00 27.00 0.00 27.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Legislative Services $ 1,290,193 $ 0 $ 1,290,193 $ 1,319,869 $ 0 $ 1,319,869

Public Services 1,153,991 0 1,153,991 1,196,020 0 1,196,020

Executive Office 835,426 0 835,426 850,143 0 850,143

Total $ 3,279,610 $ 0 $ 3,279,610 $ 3,366,032 $ 0 $ 3,366,032


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 3,279,610 $ 0 $ 3,279,610 $ 3,366,032 $ 0 $ 3,366,032

106




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 595,800 $ 0 $ 595,800 $ 595,800 $ 0 $ 595,800


5,085 0 5,085 5,085 0 5,085


2,678,725 0 2,678,725 2,765,147 0 2,765,147

Total $ 3,279,610 $ 0 $ 3,279,610 $ 3,366,032 $ 0 $ 3,366,032


County Counsel


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



County Counsel 135.00 0.00 135.00 135.00 0.00 135.00

Total 135.00 0.00 135.00 135.00 0.00 135.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



County Counsel $ 22,935,440 $ 0 $ 22,935,440 $ 23,031,595 $ 0 $ 23,031,595

Total $ 22,935,440 $ 0 $ 22,935,440 $ 23,031,595 $ 0 $ 23,031,595


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






(662,202) 0 (662,202) (681,406) 0 (681,406)

Total $ 22,935,440 $ 0 $ 22,935,440 $ 23,031,595 $ 0 $ 23,031,595

108




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 10,330,313 $ 0 $ 10,330,313 $ 10,583,882 $ 0 $ 10,583,882


8,500 0 8,500 23,500 0 23,500



12,091,704 0 12,091,704 12,424,213 0 12,424,213

Total $ 22,935,440 $ 0 $ 22,935,440 $ 23,031,595 $ 0 $ 23,031,595


San Diego County Grand Jury


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Grand Jury 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

Total 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Grand Jury $ 588,080 $ 0 $ 588,080 $ 591,003 $ 0 $ 591,003

Total $ 588,080 $ 0 $ 588,080 $ 591,003 $ 0 $ 591,003


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Total $ 588,080 $ 0 $ 588,080 $ 591,003 $ 0 $ 591,003


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 588,080 $ 0 $ 588,080 $ 591,003 $ 0 $ 591,003

Total $ 588,080 $ 0 $ 588,080 $ 591,003 $ 0 $ 591,003

Finance and General Government Group Changes110 CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Human Resources


Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Department of Human Resources

114.00 0.00 114.00 114.00 0.00 114.00

Total 114.00 0.00 114.00 114.00 0.00 114.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Department of Human Resources

$ 23,323,953 $ 0 $ 23,323,953 $ 23,241,768 $ 0 $ 23,241,768

Total $ 23,323,953 $ 0 $ 23,323,953 $ 23,241,768 $ 0 $ 23,241,768


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






(185,548) 0 (185,548) (185,548) 0 (185,548)

Total $ 23,323,953 $ 0 $ 23,323,953 $ 23,241,768 $ 0 $ 23,241,768




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 8,405 $ 0 $ 8,405 $ 8,405 $ 0 $ 8,405


1,632,228 0 1,632,228 1,632,228 0 1,632,228


7,303,271 0 7,303,271 7,372,961 0 7,372,961



13,955,049 0 13,955,049 14,228,174 0 14,228,174

Total $ 23,323,953 $ 0 $ 23,323,953 $ 23,241,768 $ 0 $ 23,241,768

Finance and General Government Group Changes112 CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14



Staffing by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




22.00 0.00 22.00 22.00 0.00 22.00

Total 22.00 0.00 22.00 22.00 0.00 22.00

Budget by Program

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 3,060,557 $ 0 $ 3,060,557 $ 3,116,675 $ 0 $ 3,116,675

Total $ 3,060,557 $ 0 $ 3,060,557 $ 3,116,675 $ 0 $ 3,116,675


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






200,000 0 200,000 200,000 0 200,000


(375,000) 0 (375,000) (375,000) 0 (375,000)

Total $ 3,060,557 $ 0 $ 3,060,557 $ 3,116,675 $ 0 $ 3,116,675




Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 350,000 $ 0 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 0 $ 350,000


2,710,557 0 2,710,557 2,766,675 0 2,766,675

Total $ 3,060,557 $ 0 $ 3,060,557 $ 3,116,675 $ 0 $ 3,116,675

115Capital Program Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Capital Program Changes

Capital Program SummaryCapital Program appropriations in the revised Proposed Operational Plan are $48.5 million for Fiscal Year 2012-13 and $12.4million for Fiscal Year 2013-14. This reflects an increase of $0.4 million or 0.7% in Fiscal Year 2012-13 from the CAOProposed Operational Plan, for a total proposed decrease of $78.7 million or -61.9% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 AdoptedOperational Plan.

Proposed changes in the Capital Program include appropriations for one existing and two new projects for the Departmentof Parks and Recreation.

Budget by Fund

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Capital Outlay Fund $ 28,240,000 $ 362,282 $ 28,602,282 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

County Health Complex Fund

0 0 0 0 0 0

Justice Facility Construction Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0

Library Projects Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0

Multiple Species Conservation Program Fund

10,000,000 0 10,000,000 2,500,000 0 2,500,000

Edgemoor Development Fund

9,886,883 0 9,886,883 9,888,933 0 9,888,933

Total $ 48,126,883 $ 362,282 $ 48,489,165 $ 12,388,933 $ 0 $ 12,388,933

116


Capital Program ChangesCAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Capital Outlay Fund

Fiscal Year 2012-13

The breakdown of the proposed increase of $0.36 million in the Capital Outlay Fund is as follows:$0.12 million for the existing Rainbow Park Improvements project, based on Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) funds. Rainbow County Park is a 4.5-acre park located in the community of Rainbow in North County SanDiego. Park facilities include multi-use sports fields, tennis and basketball courts, picnic areas, a playground andrestrooms. The proposed amount will fund improvements to the playground, including rubber safety surfacing, andadditional shade trees for the picnic areas.$0.12 million for the new Mountain Empire (Campo) Community Center Playground Phase II project, based on CDBGfunds. This project constructs various park improvements at the Mountain Empire Community Center, which isoperated by Mountain Health & Community Services, Inc., San Diego County’s primary rural health care provider. TheMountain Empire Community Center provides services including a senior nutrition program, exercise programs, anddance and Little League programs. The proposed project will install a picnic pavilion and picnic tables, Americans withDisabilities Act (ADA) accessible walkways, exercise stations, and other improvements including park benches,barbecues, landscaping and irrigation, and trash receptacles.$0.12 million for the new Spring Valley Park LED Lights and Landscaping project, based on CDBG funds. Spring ValleyCounty Park provides the community of Spring Valley with a public open space and recreational facilities including anexercise walkway, gazebo, tot lots, 26 picnic tables and four barbecues, a basketball court, and restroom. Thisproposed project will include LED lights and landscaping; these improvements will increase security and energyefficiency at the park.


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Services & Supplies $ 608,000 $ 0 $ 608,000 $ 608,000 $ 0 $ 608,000

Capital Assests/Land Acquisition

38,240,000 362,282 38,602,282 2,500,000 0 2,500,000

Operating Transfer Out

9,278,883 0 9,278,883 9,280,933 0 9,280,933

Total $ 48,126,883 $ 362,282 $ 48,489,165 $ 12,388,933 $ 0 $ 12,388,933


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 5,623,197 $ 0 $ 5,623,197 $ 5,624,304 $ 0 $ 5,624,304


11,263,686 362,282 11,625,968 4,264,629 0 4,264,629


31,240,000 0 31,240,000 2,500,000 0 2,500,000

Use of Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total $ 48,126,883 $ 362,282 $ 48,489,165 $ 12,388,933 $ 0 $ 12,388,933


117Capital Program Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Fiscal Year 2013-14


Justice Facility Construction Fund


Multiple Species Conservation Program Fund


Edgemoor Development Fund


Capital Outlay Fund Projects

Amount Funding SourceNew/Existing

Project

Rainbow Park Improvements (1014734) $ 125,000Community Development Block Grant Existing

Mountain Empire (Campo) Community Center Playground Phase II (1016992) 118,640

Community Development Block Grant New

Spring Valley Park LED Lights and Landscaping (1016993)

118,642Community Development Block Grant New

Total Capital Outlay Fund $ 362,282

119Finance Other Changes CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Finance Other Changes

Finance Other Summary Finance Other appropriations in the revised Proposed Operational Plan are $313.5 million for Fiscal Year 2012-13 and$273.8 million for Fiscal Year 2013-14. This is an increase of $0.1 million (0.02%) from CAO Proposed Operational Plan, anda proposed net decrease of $17.5 million or 5.3% from the Fiscal Year 2011-12 Adopted Budget.

Countywide General Expenses

Fiscal Year 2012-13The Chief Administrative Officer recommends a one-time conditional appropriation of $70,000 for the San DieguitoRiver Valley Regional Open Space Park Joint Powers Authority contingent upon the City of San Diego agreeing tomeet participation requirements for Fiscal Year 2013-14.

Fiscal Year 2013-14



Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Cash Borrowing $ 7,700,000 $ 0 $ 7,700,000 $ 7,700,000 $ 0 $ 7,700,000

Community Enhancement

2,500,000 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 2,500,000

Neighborhood Reinvestment Program

5,000,000 0 5,000,000 5,000,000 0 5,000,000

Contributions to County Library System

0 0 0 0 0 0

Contingency Reserve - General Fund

20,000,000 0 20,000,000 20,000,000 0 20,000,000

Contributions to Capital Program

12,000,000 0 12,000,000 2,500,000 0 2,500,000

Lease Payments - Capital Projects

43,259,601 0 43,259,601 37,032,414 0 37,032,414

120

Finance Other Changes

Finance Other ChangesCAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Countywide General Expenses

86,814,149 70,000 86,884,149 62,954,792 0 62,954,792

Countywide Shared Major Maintenance

2,000,000 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 2,000,000

Employee Benefits ISFWorkers’ Compensation Employee Benefits ISF

33,665,286 0 33,665,286 33,665,286 0 33,665,286

Unemployment Insurance Employee Benefits ISF

2,902,803 0 2,902,803 2,902,803 $ 0 2,902,803

Local Agency Formation Commission Administration

342,061 0 342,061 352,323 0 352,323

Public Liability ISF 15,776,890 0 15,776,890 15,776,890 0 15,776,890

Pension Obligation Bonds

81,467,380 0 81,467,380 81,460,697 0 81,460,697

Debt Service Local Boards

0 0 0 0 0 0

Total $ 313,428,170 $ 0 $ 313,498,170 $ 273,845,205 $ 0 $ 273,845,205


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



121Appendix: Changes by Fund CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Appendix: Changes by Fund

General Fund

Staffing

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Staff Years 14,651.75 55.00 14,706.75 14,652.75 162.00 14,814.75


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Salaries & Benefits $1,555,178,991 $ 6,187,465 $1,561,366,456 $1,605,110,832 $ 16,011,727 $1,621,122,559

Services & Supplies 1,436,034,874 22,069,103 1,458,103,977 1,345,299,864 22,941,397 1,368,241,261

Other Charges 577,836,565 1,570,000 579,406,565 570,259,493 437,325 570,696,818


2,000,000 0 2,000,000 0 0 0


6,484,276 3,103,064 9,587,340 2,580,886 0 2,580,886


(23,588,169) (6,134,393) (29,722,562) (23,730,896) (6,134,393) (29,865,289)

Contingency Reserves 20,000,000 0 20,000,000 20,000,000 0 20,000,000


1,961,400 0 1,961,400 78,400 0 78,400


84,454,353 0 84,454,353 61,491,614 0 61,491,614


Total $3,689,612,290 $ 26,795,239 $3,716,407,529 $3,604,340,193 $ 33,256,056 $3,637,596,249

122


Appendix: Changes by FundCAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter FYs 2012-13 & 2013-14

Road Fund


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





383,622,066 150,000 383,772,066 387,184,860 150,000 387,334,860


41,612,552 (50,000) 41,562,552 43,405,607 (50,000) 43,355,607


51,930,089 75,000 52,005,089 48,842,609 75,000 48,917,609


13,903,196 0 13,903,196 14,037,630 0 14,037,630


1,989,600,231 25,561,299 2,015,161,530 1,964,264,665 34,590,343 1,998,855,008


292,148,122 (2,206,519) 289,941,603 292,407,510 (2,196,439) 290,211,071


31,556,491 0 31,556,491 23,404,390 (14,112) 23,390,278


264,114,584 443,388 264,557,972 264,858,342 701,264 265,559,606


544,380 0 544,380 14,225,657 0 14,225,657

Use of Fund Balance 110,090,068 2,822,071 112,912,139 37,815,171 0 37,815,171

Total $3,689,612,290 $ 26,795,239 $3,716,407,529 $3,604,340,193 $ 33,256,056 $3,637,596,249

Staffing

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Staff Years 406.00 (1.00) 405.00 406.00 (1.00) 405.00


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 2,416,514 810,000 3,226,514 2,416,514 0 2,416,514


2,160,000 0 2,160,000 0 0 0

Total $ 94,187,303 $ 1,263,542 $ 95,450,845 $ 89,300,984 $ (121,155) $ 89,179,829



County Library


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 4,217,650 $ 0 $ 4,217,650 $ 4,218,025 $ 0 $ 4,218,025


59,388 0 59,388 55,388 0 55,388


499,000 0 499,000 499,000 0 499,000


65,218,195 571,457 65,789,652 65,218,393 0 65,218,393


18,275,495 (117,915) 18,157,580 18,852,053 (121,155) 18,730,898


459,125 0 459,125 458,125 0 458,125

Use of Fund Balance 5,458,450 810,000 6,268,450 0 0 0

Total $ 94,187,303 $ 1,263,542 $ 95,450,845 $ 89,300,984 $ (121,155) $ 89,179,829

Staffing

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Staff Years 271.75 (1.75) 270.00 267.75 (1.75) 266.00


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget






45,000 0 45,000 0 0 0


Total $ 33,492,475 $ (76,527) $ 33,415,948 $ 33,799,477 $ (78,501) $ 33,720,976

124



Sheriff's Asset Forfeiture Program


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





375,000 0 375,000 375,000 0 375,000


105,000 0 105,000 105,000 0 105,000


1,212,569 0 1,212,569 1,212,569 0 1,212,569


1,288,112 0 1,288,112 1,288,112 0 1,288,112


553,821 0 553,821 553,821 0 553,821

Use of Fund Balance 2,047,976 (76,527) 1,971,449 2,354,978 (78,501) 2,276,477

Total $ 33,492,475 $ (76,527) $ 33,415,948 $ 33,799,477 $ (78,501) $ 33,720,976


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Services & Supplies $ 1,070,000 $ (66,000) $ 1,004,000 $ 1,070,000 $ 0 $ 1,070,000


30,000 66,000 96,000 30,000 0 30,000

Total $ 1,100,000 $ 0 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 0 $ 1,100,000


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 1,000,000 $ 0 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 0 $ 1,000,000


100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 100,000

Total $ 1,100,000 $ 0 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 0 $ 1,100,000



Sheriff's Inmate Welfare

PRD 1001 Capra Way


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Services & Supplies $ 2,798,846 $ 53,000 $ 2,851,846 $ 2,798,846 $ 146,000 $ 2,944,846


2,192,390 377,388 2,569,778 2,192,390 701,264 2,893,654

Total $ 4,991,236 $ 430,388 $ 5,421,624 $ 4,991,236 $ 847,264 $ 5,838,500


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 3,055,000 $ 0 $ 3,055,000 $ 3,055,000 $ 0 $ 3,055,000


236,236 0 236,236 236,236 93,000 329,236


1,700,000 0 1,700,000 1,700,000 0 1,700,000

Use of Fund Balance 0 430,388 430,388 0 754,264 754,264

Total $ 4,991,236 $ 430,388 $ 5,421,624 $ 4,991,236 $ 847,264 $ 5,838,500


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Services & Supplies $ 374 $ 656 $ 1,030 $ 374 $ 0 $ 374

Total $ 374 $ 656 $ 1,030 $ 374 $ 0 $ 374


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Use of Fund Balance $ 374 $ 656 $ 1,030 $ 374 $ 0 $ 374

Total $ 374 $ 656 $ 1,030 $ 374 $ 0 $ 374

126



PRD 1007 Tumble Creek

Capital Outlay Fund


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Services & Supplies $ 218 $ 4,758 $ 4,976 $ 218 $ 0 $ 218

Total $ 218 $ 4,758 $ 4,976 $ 218 $ 0 $ 218


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget



Use of Fund Balance $ 218 $ 4,758 $ 4,976 $ 218 $ 0 $ 218

Total $ 218 $ 4,758 $ 4,976 $ 218 $ 0 $ 218


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 28,240,000 $ 362,282 $ 28,602,282 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

Total $ 28,240,000 $ 362,282 $ 28,602,282 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 7,000,000 $ 362,282 $ 7,362,282 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0


21,240,000 0 21,240,000 0 0 0

Total $ 28,240,000 $ 362,282 $ 28,602,282 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0



Purchasing Internal Service Fund


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget





Other Charges 102,298 0 102,298 22,339 0 22,339

Total $ 13,716,659 $ 303,929 $ 14,020,588 $ 9,613,745 $ 0 $ 9,613,745


Fiscal Year 2012-13

Proposed Budget



Fiscal Year 2013-14

Proposed Budget




$ 7,000 $ 0 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 0 $ 7,000


7,222,601 70,744 7,293,345 7,129,646 0 7,129,646


412,099 0 412,099 412,099 0 412,099


5,995,000 233,185 6,228,185 2,065,000 0 2,065,000


Total $ 13,716,659 $ 303,929 $ 14,020,588 $ 9,613,745 $ 0 $ 9,613,745

Board Member Proposed Changes

Board Member Proposed Changes

District 4, Chairman Roberts:

Land Use and Environment Group - Department of Planning and Land Use

$1,560,000 General Plan Workplan

Referrals to Budget Status

The following Referrals to Budget were submitted.

Referrals currently in the CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter include $0.6 million for the Land Use and Environment Group in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

The referral for the Public Safety Group, totaling $28.5 million, and the referrals for the Community Services Group, totaling $18.1 million, both for Fiscal Year 2012-13, are not included in the current budget total presented in the CAO Proposed Operational Plan Change Letter.

There are no Referrals to Budget for Fiscal Year 2013-14.

X

FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 & 2013-14 OPERATIONAL PLAN 2012-13 REFERRALS TO BUDGET STATUS Group: LUEG

Department: Planning and Land Use

SUBJECT: Initiative to Improve Land Development Services HEARING DATE: May 9, 2012 MINUTE ORDER: 2 DESCRIPTION OF REFERRAL: The Board directed the funding of the Continuous Improvement Program recommendation to budget based on General Fund fund balance. STATUS: A. Has this item been included in the CAO’s Proposed Operational Plan or

Change Letter? Yes No as modified (explain in REMARKS) If yes, Op Plan Change Letter B. Expenditure Category: X One-time ______ Ongoing Expense C. Fiscal impact of this item if approved: Fiscal Year

2011-12 Fiscal Year

2012-13 Fiscal Year

2013-14 Direct Cost $0 $534,000 $0 Revenue/Funding Source $0 $534,000 $0 Net Cost $0 $0 $0 Staff Years N/A N/A N/A D. Funding source(s):

General Fund Fund Balance.

X

X

FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 & 2013-14 OPERATIONAL PLAN 2012-13 REFERRAL TO BUDGET STATUS Group: LUEG

Department: Planning and Land Use

SUBJECT: Community Planning and Sponsor Group Recommendations HEARING DATE: March 28, 2012 MINUTE ORDER: 5 DESCRIPTION OF REFERRAL: The Board directed the funding of recommendations for the development of online trainings for Community Planning and Sponsor Group members to budget based on General Fund fund balance. STATUS: A. Has this item been included in the CAO’s Proposed Operational Plan or

Change Letter? Yes No as modified (explain in REMARKS) If yes, Op Plan Change Letter B. Expenditure Category: X One-time ___ Ongoing Expense C. Fiscal impact of this item if approved: Fiscal Year

2011-12 Fiscal Year

2012-13 Fiscal Year

2013-14 Direct Cost $0 $40,000 $0 Revenue/Funding Source $0 $40,000 $0 Net Cost $0 $0 $0 Staff Years N/A N/A N/A D. Funding source(s):

General Fund Fund Balance.

X

FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 & 2013-14 OPERATIONAL PLAN 2012-13 REFERRALS TO BUDGET STATUS Group: PSG

Department: Public Safety Group Executive Office

SUBJECT: East Mesa Detention Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility HEARING DATE: June 19, 2012 MINUTE ORDER: 1 DESCRIPTION OF REFERRAL: The Board referred to budget deliberations the

transfer of appropriations of $27,600,000 from the Countywide General Expenses, Operating Transfer Out, to the Contributions to Capital Outlay Fund, Operating Transfer Out, the establishment of appropriations of $27,600,000 in the Justice Facility Construction Fund and the establishment of appropriations of $936,000 in the Sheriff’s Department for Capital Project 1016416, East Mesa Detention Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility. Funds will be used toward the costs of construction ($27,600,000) and furniture, fixtures and equipment ($936,000).

STATUS: A. Has this item been included in the CAO’s Proposed Operational Plan or

Change Letter? Yes No as modified (explain in REMARKS) If yes, Op Plan Change Letter B. Expenditure Category: X One-time ____ Ongoing Expense C. Fiscal impact of this item if approved: Fiscal Year

2011-12 Fiscal Year

2012-13 Fiscal Year

2013-14 Direct Cost $0 $28,536,000 $0 Revenue/Funding Source $0 $28,536,000 $0 Net Cost $0 $0 $0 Staff Years N/A N/A N/A D. Funding source(s): The total project cost for Capital Project 1016416, East Mesa Detention Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility is $39,000,000. Of this amount, a total of $38,064,000 will fund the preliminary planning and analysis, environmental review, design-build solicitation and construction costs and $936,000 will be used toward the purchase of furniture, fixtures and equipment. The funding source is the State of California, Local Revenue Fund 2011 allocated to the County Local Revenue Fund 2011, Local Community Corrections Account, which requires an advancement of funds of $27,600,000 from the General Fund to the Justice Facility Construction Fund on behalf of the Local Community Corrections Fund.

.

X

REMARKS:

On May 24, 2012, the Executive Committee of the Community Corrections Partnership approved the allocation from the County Local Revenue Fund 2011, Local Community Corrections Account to construct the East Mesa Detention Re-Entry and Rehabilitation Facility.

FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 & 2013-14 OPERATIONAL PLAN 2012-13 REFERRAL TO BUDGET STATUS Group: Community Services Group

Department: General Services SUBJECT: County Operations Center Development - Site Improvements Funding Approval (District: 4) HEARING DATE: June 19, 2012 MINUTE ORDER: 9 DESCRIPTION OF REFERRAL: The Board referred two items: 1) Refer to budget deliberations the transfer of appropriations of $8,000,000 in the Countywide General Expenses, Operating Transfer Out, to provide funding for the Capital Project 1015131, HHSA PSG CSG Office Relocation and 2) Refer to budget deliberations the establishment of appropriations of $8,000,000 in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project 1015131, HHSA PSG CSG Office Relocation, to fund additional project costs due to an increased project scope. STATUS: A. Has this item been included in the CAO’s Proposed Operational Plan or Change

Letter? Yes No as modified (explain in REMARKS) If yes, Op Plan Change Letter B. Expenditure Category: ___X___ One-time ______ Ongoing Expense C. Fiscal impact of this item if approved:

Fiscal Year 2011-12

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Fiscal Year 2013-14

Direct Cost $0 $8,000,000 $0 Revenue/Funding Source $0 $8,000,000 $0 Total $0 $0 $0 Staff Years N/A N/A N/A

D. Funding source(s):

The $8,000,000 to fund the additional project scope will be provided by the General Fund in Fiscal Year 2012-13.

REMARKS:

The enhancements funded by the County General Fund will include: demo and grading of 9255 Chesapeake building; demo existing COC Buildings 5, 6 and 16; grade, pave and construct a parking lot in the northeast area of the campus; extend Pedestrian Plaza; upgrade COC Building 7; pressure gas lines relocation; and additional grading, site work, Chesapeake frontage improvements, parking lot improvements, additional building area and tenant improvements, and administrative costs.

X

FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 & 2013-14 OPERATIONAL PLAN 2012-13 REFERRAL TO BUDGET STATUS Group: Community Services Group

Department: General Services SUBJECT: Negotiation and Award of a contract for parking management services for County Administration Center Waterfront Park Development and Cedar Kettner Park Development Projects. HEARING DATE: June 19, 2012 MINUTE ORDER: 8 DESCRIPTION OF REFERRAL: The Board referred two items: 1) Refer to budget deliberations the establishment of appropriations of $900,000 in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project 1015204, CAC Waterfront Park Development project and 2) Refer to budget deliberations the establishment of appropriations of $600,000 in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project 1015093, Cedar and Kettner Development project, based on unanticipated revenue from the non-business hour on-site public paid-parking.

STATUS: A. Has this item been included in the CAO’s Proposed Operational Plan or

Change Letter? Yes No as modified (explain in REMARKS) If yes, Op Plan Change Letter B. Expenditure Category: ___X___ One-time ______ Ongoing Expense C. Fiscal impact of this item if approved:

Fiscal Year 2011-12

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Fiscal Year 2013-14



The funding source is unanticipated revenue generated from off-hour public parking and General Fund.

REMARKS:

Today’s request will authorize the negotiation and award of a two-year parking management services contract with an option to extend the contract for an additional 18 months. The contract will also include a revenue sharing agreement in which the County of San Diego will receive an estimated total of $1,500,000 in revenue from the net proceeds generated by the parking fees for off-hours parking at the three parking facilities. This revenue will be deposited in the Capital Outlay Fund to offset parking management costs associated with the projects.

X

FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 & 2013-14 OPERATIONAL PLAN 2012-13 REFERRALS TO BUDGET STATUS Group: Community Services Group

Department: General Services SUBJECT: Cedar and Kettner Development Project Parking Structure HEARING DATE: June 19, 2012 MINUTE ORDER: 7 DESCRIPTION OF REFERRAL: The Board referred to budget deliberations the addition of $8,600,000 in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project 1015093, Cedar and Kettner Development Project Parking Structure, to fund additional projects costs due to increased project scope. STATUS: A. Has this item been included in the CAO’s Proposed Operational Plan or Change

Letter? Yes No as modified (explain in REMARKS) If yes, Op Plan Change Letter B. Expenditure Category: ___X___ One-time ______ Ongoing Expense C. Fiscal impact of this item if approved:

Fiscal Year 2011-12

Fiscal Year 2012-13

Fiscal Year 2013-14



The total project cost for the Cedar and Kettner Development project is estimated at $35,500,000. The funding sources for the entire project are General Fund ($660,000), San Diego County Capital Asset Leasing Corporation (SANCAL) Bond Proceeds ($27,840,000) and revenue from tax sharing agreement ($7,000,000). The additional appropriations of $8,600,000 needed to complete the project will be funded by the SANCAL bond proceeds.

REMARKS:

According to the CAO Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2012-13, a cost estimate of $26,900,000 was given for the Cedar and Kettner Development project. Since then, additional scope has been identified costing the County approximately $8,600,000 in added cost. The additional scope includes soil and groundwater mitigation, offsite utilities improvements, providing managed parking, and public right-of-way improvements associated with the light and heavy rail corridor.

X

Advisory Board Statements

Alcohol and Drug Services Advisory Board

Public Communications

During the time period allocated for Public Hearings on the 2012-13 and 2013-14 Chief Administrative Officer Proposed Operational Plan, the County of San Diego received no oral public testimony.

Written public testimony was received by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors regarding Community Plans for Valley Center.

Community Enhancement Allocations

District 1, Vice-Chairman Cox ..................................................................$500,000

District 2, Supervisor Jacob......................................................................$500,000

District 3, Supervisor Slater-Price.............................................................$500,000

District 4, Chairman Roberts ....................................................................$500,000

District 5, Supervisor Horn........................................................................$500,000

All Districts Combined ...........................................................................$2,500,000

2012-13 Community Enhancement Program District AwardsSummarized by Organization *

Page 1 of 11

Organization Name District 1

District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5

Total District Awards

A Reason To Survive, Inc. 5,000 5,000Accessible San Diego 3,000 2,000 5,000Agua Hedionda Lagoon Foundation 10,000 10,000Aguinaldo Foundation 2,000 3,500 2,000 7,500Alpine Chamber of Commerce 40,000 40,000Alpine Historical and Conservation Society 5,000 5,000Alpine Woman's Club 5,000 5,000American Youth Hostels, Inc. San Diego Council 4,000 4,000America's Finest City Dixieland Jazz Society 2,500 2,500Antique Gas & Steam Engine Museum 12,820 12,820Anza Borrego Desert Natural History Association 2,500 2,500Anza Borrego Foundation 2,500 2,500Art of Elan 1,000 1,000 2,000ArtSplash 2,000 2,000Asian Story Theater 4,800 4,800Basic Assistance to Students In The Community 4,000 4,000Batiquitos Lagoon Foundation 3,000 3,000Bon Temps Social Club of San Diego 3,500 3,500Bonita Business & Professional Association, Inc. 8,500 8,500Bonita Historical Society 16,000 16,000Bonita Optimist Club 3,500 3,500Bonsall Chamber of Commerce 8,000 8,000Booster of Old Town San Diego State Historic Park 2,000 2,000


Page 2 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


Borrego Springs Chamber of Commerce 55,000 55,000Borrego Springs Performing Arts Center 2,500 2,500Business Improvement District Council 4,000 4,000Cabrillo Festival, Inc. 5,000 5,000California Ballet Association, Inc. 10,000 3,000 13,000California Center for the Arts Escondido 10,000 10,000California State Games 2,000 1,500 3,500California Surf Museum 10,000 4,000 14,000Camarada, Inc. 1,000 1,000Camp Pendleton Historical Society, Inc. 3,000 3,000Cardiff Chamber of Commerce 14,000 14,000Carlsbad Music Festival 3,000 7,000 10,000Casa Familiar, Inc. 9,000 9,000Center for Community Solutions 2,000 2,000Central Commercial District Revitalization Corp 2,000 2,000Chicano Federation of San Diego 9,000 2,500 11,500Children's Museum of San Diego 5,000 2,000 7,000CHIRP for Garden Wildlife, Inc. 4,000 4,000Christmas Circle Community Park 35,000 35,000Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce 20,000 20,000City Ballet, Inc. 10,000 10,000Classics for Kids, Inc. 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,000College Area Economic Development Corporation 3,000 3,000


Page 3 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


College of Borrego 5,000 5,000Committee of One Hundred 6,000 4,000 10,000CONNECT Foundation 4,000 4,000Coronado Community Theatre, Inc. 3,000 3,000Coronado Historical Association 3,000 3,000Cortez Racing Association 1,700 1,700Cygnet Theatre 10,000 10,000Del Mar Regional Chamber of Commerce 5,000 5,000Del Mar Village Association 10,000 10,000Diversionary Theatre Productions, Inc. 1,000 1,000Downtown Encinitas Mainstreet Association 6,000 6,000Downtown San Diego Partnership 5,000 4,000 9,000East County Economic Development Council 40,000 40,000El Cajon Boulevard Business Improvement Associations, Inc. 3,500 3,500El Cajon Historical Society 3,000 3,000El Cajon Valley Mother Goose Parade Association 5,000 5,000Elite DVBE Network 2,000 2,000 4,000Escondido Arts Partnership 3,000 3,000Escondido History Center 5,000 5,000Eveoke Dance Theatre 4,000 4,000Fallbrook Art Association 10,000 10,000Fallbrook Center for the Arts, Inc. 19,280 19,280Fallbrook Chamber of Commerce 60,000 60,000


Page 4 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


Fallbrook Food Pantry 4,000 4,000Fallbrook Gem and Mineral Society, Inc. 3,000 3,000Fallbrook Land Conservancy Foundation 8,000 8,000Fallbrook Music Society 8,000 8,000Finest City Performing Arts, Inc. 2,500 2,500Firefighters Advisory Council to the Burn Institute 2,000 5,000 2,000 9,000Flying Leatherneck Historical Foundation 4,000 4,000Food & Beverage Association of San Diego County 5,000 2,000 7,000Fourth District Seniors Resource Center 10,000 10,000Friends of San Diego Wildlife Refuges, Inc. 3,500 3,500Friends of Scott Foundation 2,000 2,000Friends of the Rancho Buena Vista Adobe 2,000 2,000Gaslamp Quarter Association, Inc. 3,000 3,000Greater San Diego Chamber of Commerce 30,000 20,000 50,000Heritage of the Americas Museum, Inc. 15,000 15,000Hillcrest Business Improvement Association 5,000 5,000Historic Highway 80 Corporation 5,000 5,000Historic Old Town Community Foundation 2,000 2,000I Love A Clean San Diego 15,000 15,000Imperial Beach Chamber of Commerce, Inc. 4,000 4,000Japan Society of San Diego and Tijuana 2,000 2,000Japanese Friendship Garden Society of San Diego 5,000 4,000 9,000Julian 4th of July Parade, Inc. 4,000 4,000


Page 5 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


Julian Arts Guild 2,000 2,000Julian Chamber of Commerce 80,000 80,000Julian Historical Society 10,000 10,000Julian Merchants Association 12,500 12,500Julian Pioneer Museum 10,000 10,000Justice Overcoming Boundaries in San Diego County 4,000 4,000Kalusugan Community Services 3,000 1,500 4,500Korean American Senior Association of San Diego County 2,000 2,000La Jolla Chapter, SPEBQSA, Inc. 2,000 2,000La Jolla Music Society 25,000 4,000 29,000La Jolla Symphony & Chorus Association 13,000 4,000 17,000La Maestra Family Clinic 3,000 3,000Lakeside Chamber of Commerce 40,000 40,000Lakeside Historical Society 3,500 3,500Lamb's Players Theatre 6,000 6,000Lemon Grove Historical Society, Inc. 2,000 2,000Leucadia-Encinitas Hwy 101 Mainstreet Association 10,000 10,000Library Association of La Jolla 18,000 2,000 20,000Lincoln Prep Boys Basketball Foundation 2,000 2,000 4,000Linda Vista Multicultural Fair, Inc. 10,000 10,000Live Oak Questers #1166 2,500 2,500Lux Art Institute 15,000 15,000Maine Avenue Revitalization Association 6,000 6,000


Page 6 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


Mainly Mozart, Inc. 4,000 31,000 5,000 30,000 70,000Mainstreet Coronado Ltd. 2,000 2,000Maritime Museum Association of San Diego 25,000 2,000 27,000MCRD Museum Historical Society 1,000 1,000Media Arts Center San Diego 5,000 2,000 7,000Mingei International, Inc. 5,000 5,000Mission Trails Regional Park Foundation, Inc. 2,500 2,500Mojalet Dance Collective 5,000 5,000Mountain Empire Historical Society 7,900 7,900Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego 5,000 15,000 20,000Museum of Photographic Arts 5,000 5,000National City Chamber of Commerce 12,500 12,500New Village Arts, Inc. 5,000 5,000North Coast Repertory Theater 25,000 25,000North Park Historical Society 1,500 1,500North Park Organization of Businesses, Inc. 4,000 4,000NTC Foundation 2,500 2,500Ocean Beach Community Foundation, Inc. 2,000 2,000Ocean Beach Merchant's Association 8,000 8,000Ocean Beach Town Council, Inc. 2,000 2,000Oceanside CERT 3,700 3,700Oceanside Chamber of Commerce 28,000 28,000Olaf Wieghorst Museum Foundation 7,000 7,000


Page 7 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


Old Globe Theatre 15,000 10,000 25,000Old Town San Diego Chamber of Commerce 2,000 2,000Onstage Playhouse 4,500 4,500Otay Mesa Chamber of Commerce 10,000 10,000Pagasa-Tumainisha-Esperanza-Hope, Inc. 2,500 2,000 4,500Parade Band Foundation, Inc. 5,500 5,500PASACAT, Inc. 3,500 3,500Pauma Valley Community Association 3,000 3,000Peninsula Chamber of Commerce 6,000 2,500 8,500Point Loma Nazarene University 3,000 3,000Point Loma Summer Concerts 5,000 2,000 7,000Poway Center for the Performing Arts Foundation 2,400 2,400Poway Performing Arts Company 1,000 1,000Prime Motivation 2,500 2,500Ramona Chamber of Commerce 42,000 42,000Ramona Pioneer Historical Society 15,000 15,000Rancho Santa Fe Historical Society 3,700 3,700Reuben H. Fleet Science Center 10,000 15,000 25,000Riding Emphasizing Individual Needs & Strengths 6,000 6,000SAMAHAN Filipino American Performing Arts & Education Center (f l SAMAHAN Phili i D C )

2,000 4,000 6,000San Diego Air & Space Museum 12,000 4,000 16,000San Diego Alliance For Asian Pacific Islander Americans, Inc. 2,000 2,000San Diego Archaeological Center 4,000 4,000


Page 8 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


San Diego Armed Services YMCA 7,000 2,500 9,500San Diego Asian Film Foundation 5,000 5,000 10,000 20,000San Diego Automotive Museum 5,000 4,000 9,000San Diego Ballet 2,000 2,000 4,000San Diego Bowl Game Association 8,000 20,000 28,000San Diego Center for Jewish Culture 3,000 3,000San Diego Chamber Orchestra 1,500 1,500San Diego Children's Choir 1,500 1,500San Diego Chinese Historical Society & Museum 2,000 8,000 10,000San Diego Civic Youth Ballet 2,000 2,000San Diego Coastkeeper 5,000 5,000 10,000San Diego Convention & Visitors Bureau 40,000 32,000 72,000San Diego County Bicycle Coalition 3,000 2,000 5,000San Diego Dance Theater 2,000 10,000 12,000San Diego East Visitor’s Bureau 80,000 80,000San Diego Filipino-American Humanitarian Foundation, Inc. 2,500 6,000 8,500San Diego Film Commission 3,000 3,000San Diego Hall of Champions, Inc. 15,000 15,000San Diego Historical Society 4,000 6,000 10,000San Diego Junior Theatre 2,000 2,500 4,500San Diego Master Chorale 4,000 4,000San Diego Model Railroad Museum 3,000 3,000 6,000San Diego Museum Council 2,000 2,000


Page 9 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


San Diego Museum of Art 15,000 15,000San Diego Museum of Man 13,000 12,000 25,000San Diego North Chamber of Commerce 15,000 15,000San Diego North Economic Development Council 60,000 60,000San Diego Opera Association 60,000 15,000 75,000San Diego Performing Arts League 3,000 2,000 5,000San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation 5,000 5,000San Diego Repertory Theatre 1,500 1,500San Diego Second Chance Program 2,000 2,000San Diego Shakespeare Society, Inc. 4,500 4,500San Diego Society of Natural History 20,000 15,000 35,000San Diego Sportfishing Council 6,000 6,000San Diego Sports Commission 2,500 7,500 10,000San Diego Symphony Orchestra Association 5,000 30,000 15,000 50,000San Diego Young Artists Symphony Orchestra 1,500 1,500San Diego Youth Symphony and Conservatory 3,500 12,000 2,000 17,500San Dieguito Heritage Museum, Inc. 5,000 5,000San Dieguito River Valley JPA 12,000 12,000San Elijo Lagoon Conservancy 20,000 20,000San Ysidro Chamber of Commerce 7,000 7,000Santee Historical Society 2,200 2,200Serving Youth Through Education and Support 3,000 3,000Shelter Care Providers of San Diego, Inc. 4,000 4,000


Page 10 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


Sherman Heights Community Center 5,000 5,000Solana Beach Chamber of Commerce 2,500 2,500South County Economic Development Council 30,000 30,000Spreckels Organ Society 2,000 2,000Spring Valley Chamber of Commerce 40,000 40,000Spring Valley Historical Society 3,000 3,000Springfest Inc. 2,000 2,000Starlings Volleyball Clubs, USA 1,500 1,500Theatre & Arts Foundation of San Diego County 20,000 20,000Third Avenue Village Association 5,000 5,000Tierrasanta Community Council 3,500 3,500Travelers Aid Society of San Diego, Inc. 7,000 3,000 10,000University Heights Community Development Corporation 3,000 3,000Valley Center Pageant Association 5,000 5,000Visit Oceanside, Inc. 10,000 10,000Vista Chamber of Commerce 15,000 15,000Vista Historical Society, Inc. 3,000 3,000Vista Town Center Association, Inc. 2,500 2,500Vista Townsite Community Partnership 2,000 2,000Voices for Children, Inc. 7,000 7,000WalkSanDiego 5,000 2,000 7,000Warner Springs Community Resource Board 3,000 3,000Westwind Brass, Inc. 2,000 2,000 4,000


Page 11 of 11


District 2

District 3

District 4

District 5


WiLDCOAST 7,000 7,000World Trade Center San Diego 12,000 20,000 32,000Young Audiences of San Diego 3,500 6,000 9,500Zeta Sigma Lambda Foundation, Inc. 2,000 6,000 8,000TOTAL CEP Funds Allocated 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000

* See individual Board Member recommendations for specific activities to be funded for each organization.

VERIFICATIONSTATf, Or CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Sd Dicso

I hav€ r€ad the foregoingOTHER LAWS

E cHECK APPLICABLE PA.RAGRAPHU I am a pety to lhis action. Thc matters sLtcd in thc foEaoitrg dcuhot e Eu. ofmy owr knowledS. cxccpl a! to

- thos. matrers which are slated on infornarion and belief, and as to those mnen I believe them to t€ true.

El I am E an ofric€r tr . part €r tr a of san Dicsans for open

PF-, IITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE UNDER THE RALPH M, BROWN ACI AN'Dond know its conlents.

a p6tty to this action, alrd am auhorizid to makc rhis vsificatior for and on its behalf, and I matc lhis v€rification for thatreason. E Iam informed md bclieve md on that ground allege ihat ihe matters slal€d in the foreSoing docutned arE

true. E The matters stated in th€ foreSoirg docuEdt are tru€ of my own knowl€dge except as to those matlers which

- are sial.d on infomation md h.licf. and E to thos€ matlers I believe them io be true.

Ll I am om ot$e anomeys fora party ro this action. Such party b abst fi,om the county of aforesaid whcre such adomqs have ft€n offices, and I makethis vcrification for and on b€half of that party for thal re.son. I am informcd ed beli€vc and on lhal gound allcge thal lhematocrs strt€d in thc for.going documcnt e huc.Executcdm Juty 3 ,20 L,at &aP!9L_, califomia.I d€clarc oder p€nalty ofpe,jury under rhe laws of lhe Stale of Catifomia lhat lhe forcgoing is lruc and correcl.

SigruiurEPR(X)T'OF SERVICE

T)?€ or Pri,t Namc

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OTI am €mployed in rhe clmty of

I am ov€r ihc a8c of lE ud noi ! parq to lhc wiitin aclim; my buincis sddt6s is,, st8re ofcalifomia

On _,20 _, I sewcd lh€ foregoing document describ6d as

-=-

in lhis a.tio,l-J by placins fie r.u€ copies thercol .ffiose-d in scaled envelopes sdalressed as stated on the atlachcd mailing list:

Ll by placing tr tbe orisinal tr a tru€ copy $ermfenctosed in sellen envelop€s addressed as follo*s:

! av y4,tr-L l . I deposired such envelope in lhe mailarTheenvelopewa! mail€d with poslrge lherlon tully prepaid.

L l a" rotlo*" I M "nadily farniliaf wilh the fim's pnctic€ ofcoll€cliotr and processitrs conespodenc€ for mailing.Undcrlhal practice itwouldbe dcpositedwilh U.S. podtal scrvice on thrl same day wilh poslage thereon ftlly prEFidat

, Califomia.

Califomia in the ordinary coursc ofbusincss. I am aware lhat on motion ofthepos6l csnc€Ualion dale or poslage meler d!!e is morc than on€ day aner date ofpafy sew€d, service is presm€d invalid if

deposit for maili's in lffidavit.

tr ..(By pE-RSoNEi SERVICE) I delivered such.nvelop. by hand lo lhe offices ofthe ad&€ssee.,20 _, al

trtr

, Califomia.

. Califomia.

(State)

-'2o

-' at

I declare undel perulty ofperjury under the laws of the Statc of Califomia that the obove is Eue and co.rect I(Fedenl) declar€ lhat I m enPloyed itr th€ ofiice ofa mchberoflhe bff ofthis court al whosc dircctiotr the s€rvice was

Sisrfire. (By E 96urnE {g E Of Fr

iE ws B€ 1ur of E*eR)

1 Complaint

Documents

ou lev ard

52525458 kearny

village grove

bonita historical

chief administrative

chief financial

increased

firefighters