1 Carbon Nanotube Antennas for Wireless Communications Jack Winters Jack Winters Communications, LLC [email protected]www.jackwinters.com NJ Coast Section Meeting ed by the ElectroMagnetic Compatibility/Vehicular Technology/Antennas & Propagation Cha March 18, 2010
35
Embed
1 Carbon Nanotube Antennas for Wireless Communications Jack Winters Jack Winters Communications, LLC [email protected] NJ Coast.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Carbon Nanotube Antennas for Wireless Communications
• Smart Antennas (keeping within standards):• Range increase• Interference suppression• Capacity increase• Data rate increase using multiple transmit/receive antennas (MIMO)
• Radio resource management techniques• Dynamic channel/packet assignment• Adaptive modulation/coding/platform (software defined radio)• Cognitive radio (wideband sensing)
7
Smart Antennas
Smart antenna is a multibeam or adaptive antenna array that tracks the wireless environment to significantly improve the performance of wireless systems.
Switched Multibeam versus Adaptive Array Antenna: Simple beam tracking, but limited interference suppression and diversity gain, particularly in multipath environments
Adaptive arrays are generally needed for devices and when used for MIMO
SIGNAL OUTPUT
SIGNAL
INTERFERENCE
INTERFERENCEBEAMFORMER
WEIGHTS
SIGNAL OUTPUT
BEAM SELECT
SIGNAL
BE
AM
FOR
ME
R
Adaptive Antenna ArraySwitched Multibeam Antenna
8
Key to Higher Data Rates:Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) Radio
• With M transmit and M receive antennas, can provide M independent channels, to increase data rate M-fold with no increase in total transmit power (with sufficient multipath) – only an increase in DSP. Peak link throughput increase:
– Indoors – up to 150-fold in theory
– Outdoors – 8-12-fold typical
9
MIMO
• LTE/WiMAX/802.11n: 2X2, 4X2, 4X4 MIMO
• 802.11ad (60 GHz):
– 10 to 100 antennas
– Phased array
– On chip
• 802.11ac (<6 GHz)
– 8X4 or 16X2 MIMO => multiple access point/terminal antennas
– 80-100 MHz bandwidth => cognitive radio (large networks)
10
RFID – Adaptive Arrays for Readers and Tags
• Active and passive tags• Read ranges with omni-directional antennas:
• Reader can use scanning beam to transmit, adaptive array to receive
• Tag can use adaptive array to receive, then use same weights to transmit
11
Issues
• Large arrays at access point/base station/terminal:
– Diversity (for MIMO) in small size
• 700 MHz
– Low cost/power signal processing
– 802.11n: up to 4 on card/computer, but only 1 or 2 at handset
– Multiplatform (MIMO) terminals, and the need for multi-band/conformal/embedded antennas, increase the problem
• Cognitive radio – cross-layer with
– MIMO
– Wide bandwidth
12
Adaptive Arrays for RFID Tags
• Tags can be very small devices (single chip), making multiple antenna placement an issue
• At 900 MHz, half-wavelength spacing is 6 inches.
13
Diversity Types
Spatial: Separation – only ¼ wavelength needed at terminal (but can’t do at 700 MHz)
Polarization: Dual polarization (doubles number of antennas in one location
Pattern: Allows even closer than ¼ wavelength
=> 16 or more on a handset
14
• Most systems consider only 2 antennas on devices (4 antennas in future) because of costly A/Ds and size of antennas.
Multiplatform Devices with Smart Antennas
Antenna Location
15
Signal Processing: Analog/Switching (RF) or Digital
Analog Advantages:• Digital requires M complete RF chains, including M A/D and
D/A's, versus 1 A/D and D/A for analog, plus substantial digital signal processing
• The cost is much lower than digital (see, e.g., R. Eickhoff, et al, “Developing Energy-Efficient MIMO Radios”, IEEE VT magazine, March 2009)
• Switched antennas have even lower cost
Digital Advantages:• Slightly higher gain in Rayleigh fading (as more accurate weights
can be generated)• Temporal processing can be added to each antenna branch much
easier than with analog, for higher gain with delay spread• Needed for spatial processing with MIMO
=> Use RF combining where possible, minimizing digital combining (limit to number of spatial streams)
16
Combination of Switching, RF, and Digital Combining (Hybrid)
“Capacity and Complexity Trade-offs in MIMO Analog–Digital Combining Systems,” Xin Zhou, Jack Winters, Patrick Eggers, and Persefoni Kyritsi, Wireless Personal Communications, July 24, 2009. RF combining in addition to digital combining provides added gain for higher data rates over larger area with reduced cost
17
Closely-Spaced Antennas - Solutions
1) Metamaterials:
- Closer spacing with low mutual coupling but good diversity (pattern) and smaller size with directivity (active antennas)
3) SuperconductivityCan “pull” transmitted power to receiver (requires
large currents)
21
4) Carbon Nanotube Antennas
Basic features
• Wave velocity is 1% of free space 1.7 mm (vs. 17 cm) half-wavelength spacing at 900 MHz 10,000 antennas in same area (106 antennas in same volume) as standard antenna=> Very low antenna efficiency – but have pattern diversity=> Much stronger than steel for given weight Can be integrated with graphene circuitry for adaptive arrays
• Current density > metal (3 orders of magnitude greater than copper)• Strength > Steel (2 orders of magnitude stronger by weight)• Thermal Conductivity > Diamond (1 order of magnitude greater than copper)
25
SWCNT Issues [1]
• Small diameter (usually no larger than 2 nm)• Short length (usually less than 100 microns)• 1/3 metallic and 2/3 semiconductor (without control of which kind)• Full scale, low cost production• Electrical contact to electronics (graphene electronics)
26
Structure of SWCNTs [1]
27
Implementation
SWCNT pillars – connect with array electronicshttp://www.ou.edu/engineering/nanotube/
28
Arrays
Antenna Weights
Graphene electronics: • 2 orders of magnitude higher electron mobility than silicon• >30 GHz transistors demonstrated
One MWCNT antenna – 24 nm outer, 10 nm inner diameter (transmission electron microscope image)
31
Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes – Threads [1]
32
MWCNT Thread in Radio [1]
33
Non-Aligned Carbon Nanotube Antennas
• Non-aligned CNT sheet [3]
• Sheet resistivity: ~ 20 /
High conductivity and flexibility([2] Zhou, Bayram, Volakis, APS2009)
• CNT length: ~200 μm
• CNT spacing distance: ~ 100 nm
• CNT tips are entangled (touching), giving rise to high conductivity
cross section view
top view
34
Polymer-CNT Patch Antenna Performance [2]
1.5 2 2.5 3-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Frequency (GHz)
dB
Measured CNTs patch
Simulated PEC patch
Simulated CNTs patch
Rea
lize
d ga
in (
dB)
1.5 2 2.5 3-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Frequency (GHz)
dB
Measured CNTs patch
Simulated PEC patch
Simulated CNTs patch
Measured CNTs patch
Simulated PEC patch
Simulated CNTs patch
Rea
lize
d ga
in (
dB)
1.5 2 2.5 3-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
dB
Frequency (GHz)
S11
(dB
)
1.5 2 2.5 3-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
dB
Frequency (GHz)
S11
(dB
)
31 mm
56 mm
8 mm
MCT-PDMS substrate, 5 mm
CNTs sheet
150 mm
Return loss Gain
• CNT patch: 0.9 Ohm/square
• Patch antenna: 5.6 dB gain (compared to 6.4 dB of PEC patch)
• Radiation efficiency: 83%
• CNT patch: 0.9 Ohm/square
• Patch antenna: 5.6 dB gain (compared to 6.4 dB of PEC patch)
• Radiation efficiency: 83%
35
Summary and Conclusions
• Communication systems increasingly need electrically small, active antennas – multiplatform devices with MIMO, small RFIDs• Carbon nanotube antennas have unique properties including strength, current density, wave velocity, and thermal conductivity.• They can be connected directly to graphene electronics (with high electron mobility) for dense adaptive arrays of SWCNT.• Many issues to be resolved, but substantial innovation opportunity (examples including MWCNT threads and non-aligned SWCNT sheets).